Impact of Normalization in Future

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)
Volume 3 Issue 5, August 2019 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD25128 | Volume – 3 | Issue – 5 | July - August 2019 Page 153
Impact of Normalization in Future
D. Gokila, S. BalaSubramani
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science,
Sri Krishna Adithya College of Arts and Science, Kovai Pudur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
How to cite this paper: D. Gokila | S.
BalaSubramani "Impact of Normalization
in Future" Published
in International
Journal of Trend in
Scientific Research
and Development
(ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-
6470, Volume-3 |
Issue-5, August
2019, pp.153-156,
https://doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd25128
Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and
International Journalof Trendin Scientific
Research and Development Journal. This
is an Open Access article distributed
under the terms of
the Creative
Commons Attribution
License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by
/4.0)
ABSTRACT
Data and functionality are two primary aspects of systems. Unfortunately,
there is a mental gap between these two aspects. Therefore, nowadays many
are looking for the corresponding research and development fields as quite
distinct with different terminology, tools, problems, processes,methods and
best practices.
Normalization is a process of organizing the data in database to keep away
from data redundancy, insertion anomaly, update abnormality &
removingabnormality or it is the process of minimizing redundancy from a
relation or set of relations.Redundancyin relation maycauseinsertion,deletion
and updation of anomalies. So, it helps to minimize the redundancy in
relations. Normal forms are used to remove or reduce redundancyindatabase
tables.
It was first proposed by Edgar F. Codd (1970) as an integral part of
his relational model.Codd defined the 2NF and 3NF in 1971.
This entails to organize the columns (attributes) and tables (relations) of a
database to make sure that their dependencies are suitably imposed by
database integrity constraints. It is proficient by applying some formal rules
either by a process of synthesis (creating a new database design)
or decomposition (improving an existing database design). Normalization has
four basic thrusts today:
The first is for consciousness-raising. Normalization will
help us dislodge some of the prejudices and biases that both
we and the general society at large hold against people who
are different. Unless we surface these massive, deeply held,
often unconscious beliefs about differentness, as they are
directed towards those labeled retarded in our society, we
will make very slow headway in transforming social
institutions
Normalization usuallyinvolves isolatinga database intotwo
or more tables and defining relationships between the
tables. The objective is to isolate data so that adding,
deleting, and modifying a field can be made in just one table
and then propagated through the rest of the databasevia the
defined relationships.
Here are the most commonly used normal forms:
 First normal form(1NF)
 Second normal form(2NF)
 Third normal form(3NF)
 Boyce & Codd normal form (BCNF)
First normal form (1NF)
As per the rule of first normal form, an attribute (column) of
a table cannot hold many values. It should hold only atomic
values, it violates first normal form or a relation is in first
normal form if it does not contain any composite or multi-
valued attribute. A relation is in first normal form if and if
only every attribute in that relation is singled valued
attribute.
Example: Company wants to store the names and contact
details of employees.
emp_id emp_name emp_address emp_mobile
101 Herschel New Delhi 8912312390
102 Jon Kanpur 8812121212
9900012222
103 Ron Chennai 7778881212
104 Lester Bangalore 9990000123
8123450987
Two employees (Jon & Lester) are having two mobile
numbers so the company stored them in the same field as
you can see in the table above.
This table is not in 1NF as the rule says “each attribute of a
table must have atomic (single) values”, the emp_mobile
values for employees Jon & Lester violates that rule.
To make the table to complies with 1NF:
emp_id emp_name emp_address emp_mobile
101 Herschel New Delhi 8912312390
102 Jon Kanpur 8812121212
102 Jon Kanpur 9900012222
103 Ron Chennai 7778881212
Second normal form (2NF)
In 2NF the following conditions hold:
 Table is in 1NF (First normal form)
 No non-prime attribute is reliant on thepropersubset of
any candidate key of table.
IJTSRD25128

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
An attribute that is nota part of any candidate key is known
as non-prime attribute...
Partial Dependency – If proper subset of candidate key
whichdetermine non-prime attribute, it is called partial
dependency.
 Example 1 – In relation STUDENT_COURSE given in
Table 3,
 FD set: {COURSE_NO->COURSE_NAME}
 Candidate Key: {STUD_NO, COURSE_NO}
In FD COURSE_NO->COURSE_NAME, COURSE_NO (proper
subset of candidate key) is determining COURSE_NAME
(non-prime attribute). Hence, it is partial dependency and
relation is not in second normal form.
To convert it to second normal form, we will decompose the
relation STUDENT_COURSE (STUD_NO, COURSE_NO,
COURSE_NAME) as:
STUDENT_COURSE (STUD_NO, COURSE_NO)
COURSE (COURSE_NO, COURSE_NAME)
Note – This decomposition will be lossless join
decomposition as well as dependency preserving.
 Example 2 – Considerfollowingfunctionaldependencies
in relation R (A, B , C, D )
 AB -> C [A and B together determine C]
BC ->D [B and C together determine D]
In the above relation, AB is the only candidate key and there
is no partial dependency, i.e., any proper subset of AB
doesn’t determine any non-prime attribute.
Example 3:A school wants to store the data of teachers and
the subjects that they teach. Since a teacher can teach more
than a subject, the table can have multiplerows forateacher.
teacher_id Subject teacher_age
111 Maths 38
111 Physics 38
222 Biology 38
333 Physics 40
333 Chemistry 40
Candidate Keys: {teacher_id, subject}
Non prime attribute: teacher_age
The table is in 1 NF because each attributehas atomicvalues.
However, it is not in 2NF because non prime attribute
teacher_age is reliant on teacher_id alone which is a proper
subset of candidate key. This violates the rule for 2NF as the
rule says “no non-prime attribute is dependent on the
proper subset of any candidate key of the table”.
To make the table complies with 2NF we can break it in two
tables like this:
teacher_details table:
teacher_id teacher_age
111 38
222 38
333 40
Teacher_subject table:
teacher_id subject
111 Maths
111 Physics
222 Biology
333 Physics
333 Chemistry
Now the tables comply with Second normal form (2NF).
Third Normal form (3NF)
In 3NF the following conditions holds:
 Table should be in 2NF
 Transitivefunctionaldependencyof non-primeattribute
is on any super key should be removed.
An attribute which is not part of any candidate key is known
as non-prime attribute.
In other words 3NF can be explained as: A table is in 3NF ifit
is in 2NF and for each functional dependency X-> Y have at
least one of the following conditions:
 X is a super key of table
 Y is a prime attribute of table
An attribute which is a part of one of the candidate keys is
known as prime attribute.
Transitive dependency – If A->B and B->C are two FDs then
A->C is called transitive dependency.
 Example 1 – In relation STUDENT given in Table 4,
FD set: {STUD_NO -> STUD_NAME, STUD_NO ->
STUD_STATE, STUD_STATE->STUD_COUNTRY, STUD_NO->
STUD_AGE, and STUD_STATE -> STUD_COUNTRY}
Candidate Key: {STUD_NO}
For this relation in table 4, STUD_NO -> STUD_STATE and
STUD_STATE -> STUD_COUNTRY are true. So
STUD_COUNTRY is transitively dependent on STUD_NO. It
violates third normal form. To convert it in third normal
form, we will decompose the relation
STUDENT (STUD_NO, STUD_NAME, STUD_PHONE,
STUD_STATE, STUD_COUNTRY_STUD_AGE) as:
STUDENT (STUD_NO, STUD_NAME, STUD_PHONE,
STUD_STATE, STUD_AGE)
STATE_COUNTRY (STATE, COUNTRY)
 Example 2 – Consider relation R(A, B, C, D, E)
A -> BC,
CD -> E,
B -> D,
E -> A
All possible candidate keys in above relation are {A, E, CD,
BC} All attribute are on right sides of all functional
dependencies are prime.
Example 3: If a company wants to store the complete address of each and every employee.
emp_id emp_name empzip emp_state emp_city emp_district
1001 John 282005 UP Agra Dayal Bagh
1002 Ajeet 222008 TN Chennai M-City
1006 Lora 282007 TN Chennai Sowkarpet
1101 Lilly 292008 UK Pauri Bhagwan
1201 Steve 222999 MP Gwalior Ratan

Super keys: {emp_id}, {emp_id, emp_name}, {emp_id, emp_name, emp_zip}…so on
Candidate Keys: {emp_id}
Non-prime attributes: all attributes except emp_id are non-prime as they are not part of any candidate keys.
Here, emp_state, emp_city& emp_district dependent on emp_zip. And, emp_zip is dependent on emp_id thatmakes non-prime
attributes (emp_state, emp_city & emp_district) transitively dependent on super key (emp_id). This violates the rule of 3NF.
To make this table complies with 3NF we have to break the table into two tables to remove the transitive dependency:
Employee table:
emp_id emp_name emp_zip
1001 John 282005
1002 Ajeet 222008
1006 Lora 282007
1101 Lilly 292008
1201 Steve 222999
Employee_zip table:
emp_zip emp_state emp_city emp_district
282005 UP Agra Dayal Bagh
222008 TN ChennaiM-City
282007 TN ChennaiSowkarpet
292008 UK Pauri Bhagwan
222999 MP Gwalior Ratan
Boyce Codd normal form (BCNF)
It is aprogressadaptation of 3NF that’s why it is also termed as 3.5NF. BCNF is stricter than 3NF. A table which complies with
BCNF if it is in 3NF and for every functional dependency X->Y, X should be termed as super key of the table.
 Example 1 –For example consider relation R(A, B, C)
A -> BC,
B ->
A and B both are super keys so above relation is in BCNF.
Key Points –
1. BCNF is free of redundancy.
2. If a relation is in BCNF, then 3NF is also satisfy.
3. If all attributes of relation are the prime attribute, then the relation is alwaysconsider as 3NF.
4. A relation in a Relational Database is always bave at least in 1NF form.
5. Every Binary Relation (a Relation with only 2 attributes) always in BCNF.
6. If a Relation has only single candidate key, then the Relation is always in 2NF (because no Partial functional dependency
possible).
7. Sometimes going for BCNF form may not maintain functionaldependency.Insuch casemoveforBCNFonlyif thelost FD(s)
is not required, else normalize till 3NF.
8. There are many more Normal forms that exist after BCNF, like 4NF andmore. But in realworld databasesystemsgenerally
not required to go further than BCNF.
Example 2: There is a company wherein employees work in more than a department.
emp_id emp_nationality emp_dept dept_type dept_no_of_emp
1001 Austrian Production and planning D001 200
1001 Austrian Stores D001 250
1002 American design and technical support D134 100
1002 American Purchasing department D134 600
Functional dependencies in the table above:
emp_id -> emp_nationality
emp_dept -> {dept_type, dept_no_of_emp}
Candidate key: {emp_id, emp_dept}
The table is not in BCNF as neither emp_id nor emp_dept alone are keys.
To make the table comply with BCNF we can break the table in three tables like this:
emp_nationality table:
emp_id emp_nationality
1001 Austrian
1002 American

Emp_dept table:
emp_dept dept_type dept_no_of_emp
Production and planning D001 200
stores D001 250
design and technical suppo D134 100
Purchasing department D134 600
Emp_dept_mapping table:
emp_id emp_dept
1001 Production and planning
1001 Stores
1002 Design and technical support
1002 Purchasing department
Functional dependencies:
emp_id -> emp_nationality
emp_dept -> {dept_type, dept_no_of_emp}
Candidate keys:
For first table: emp_id
for second table: emp_dept
for third table: {emp_id, emp_dept}
This is now in BCNF as in both the functional dependencies
left side part is a key.
Should I Normalize?
While database normalization is a good idea, it's not an
absolute requirement. In fact, there are many cases where
purposely violating the rules of normalization is a good
practice.
If you'd like to make sure your database is normalized, start
with learning how to put your database into First Normal
Form.
CONCLUSION:
Normalization is a fundamental tool to initially indoctrinate
and train all potential human service workers . . . physicians,
nurses, therapists, teachers, administrators, anybody in the
human services embarking on their educational course.
Technology must derive from the normalization concerns,
and not vice versa. Sadly, technology today, as we know it, is
so entrenched in attitudes and practices which dehumanize
and devalue people served that normalization, taught apart
from the core curriculum, becomes rhetoric to cloak
business as usual. 4. Finally, normalization, or the socio-
developmental model of growth, provides one of the most
coherent and systematic ideologies to light the road for all
human services: a guide, a direction in an era of turmoil,
arbitrary scientific innovation, grass roots
disenfranchisement and moralbankruptcyof so manyof our
professions.
Hence we have seen how normalization can decrease
duplications, increase efficiencies by implementing the four
levels of normalization forms.
The first three NF’s are generallyenough for most small to
medium size applications. Thus table structureis always in a
certain normal form.
REFERENCES:
[1] CJ DATE” An Introdution to Database Systems”
[2] S. K. Singh ”Database Systems”
[3] Henry K. Forth “Database Systems and Concepts”
REFERENCE LINKS:
1. http://www.bbc.com/future/story
2. https://mn.gov/mnddc/parallels2/
3. https://www.guru99.com/database-normalization.html
4. https://www.studytonight.com/dbms/database-
normalization.php

Impact of Normalization in Future

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Impact of Normalization in Future (20)

More from ijtsrd (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Impact of Normalization in Future