Implementation of double-layer loaded on octagon microstrip yagi antenna

Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
Vol. 10, No. 6, December 2021, pp. 3289~3296
ISSN: 2302-9285, DOI: 10.11591/eei.v10i6.3193 3289
Journal homepage: http://beei.org
Implementation of double-layer loaded on octagon microstrip
yagi antenna
Kamelia Quzwain1
, Alyani Ismail2
, Yudiansyah3
, Nadia Media Rizka4
,
Aisyah Novfitri5
, Lia Hafiza6
1,3,4,5,6
Department of Telecommunication Engineering, Institut Teknologi Telkom Jakarta, Indonesia
2
Department of Computer and Communication Systems Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
Article Info ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received Jul 31, 2021
Revised Sep 23, 2021
Accepted Oct 29, 2021
A double-layer loaded on the octagon microstrip yagi antenna (OMYA) at 5.8
GHz industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) Band is investigated in this
paper. The double-layer consist of two double positive (DPS) substrates. The
OMYA is overlaid with a double-layer configuration were simulated,
fabricated and measured. A good agreement was observed between the
computed and measured results of the gain for this antenna. According to
comparison results, it shows that 2.5 dB improvement of the OMYA gain can
be obtained by applying the double-layer on the top of the OMYA.
Meanwhile, the bandwidth of the measured OMYA with the double-layer is
14.6%. It indicates that the double-layer can be used to increase the OMYA
performance in term of gain and bandwidth.
Keywords:
ISM band
Microstrip antenna
Multilayer
Photonic crystal
Yagi antenna This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA license.
Corresponding Author:
Kamelia Quzwain
Department of Telecommunication Engineering
Institut Teknologi Telkom Jakarta
Daan Mogot KM.11, Cengkareng, West Jakarta 11710, Indonesia
Email: kamelia@ittelkom-jkt.ac.id
1. INTRODUCTION
Frequency of 5.8 GHz is one of unlicensed frequencies which is used in low rate applications, for
instance, sensor and radar [1]-[3]. Antennas play a vital role in wireless communication system. Microstrip
patch antennas (MPAs) have some attractive advantages, such as easy fabrication, simplicity in design and
lightweight. However, MPAs are associated with low gain [4]-[7]. Multilayer structure concept can be used
to increase the gain of MPAs [8]-[11]. In addition, Yagi-Uda concept can be employed to tackle this
limitation [12]. Several MPA-based Yagi-Uda concept have been introduced in [13]-[15].
In 2007, Dejean et al [13] reported a high gain microstrip Yagi antenna in order to improve the
performance of the first microstrip Yagi antenna. The gain of their antenna is 10.7 dB with a size of 112 x
112 mm2
. Octagon microstip yagi antenna (OMYA) was introduced by Quzwain et al in [14]. Four octagon
patches were successfully applied as driven elements to increase the performance in terms of bandwidth and
gain without increasing the size of the antenna. This antenna is able to produce a gain of 11 dB with the
surface size of 70 mm x 75 mm. As reported in literature [15], microstrip Yagi-Uda antenna can be
constructed in a stacked-multilayer in order to minimize the size of the antenna. A gain of about 11 dB can be
achieved through this design.
On the other side, numerous researchers in [16]-[18] were attracted to increase the gain of MPA by
placing double positive (DPS) substrate above the MPA as a superstrate layer. An extra gain can be achieved
by choosing the thicknesses of the DPS substrate and the superstrate layers properly. An interesting method

 ISSN: 2302-9285
Bulletin of Electr Eng & Inf, Vol. 10, No. 6, December 2021 : 3289 – 3296
3290
to obtain more gain was introduced in [19] where the octagon fractal microstrip yagi antenna (OFMYA) is
overlaid with a combined double negative (DNG) and DPS substrates as superstrate layer. To date, no
previous experimental study has provided information on OMYA using double-layer. This paper introduces
the OMYA using a doble-layer in order to improve the OMYA performance. Data for this investigations
were collected based on simulation and experimental results. The paper is structured as; section 2 begins by
giving an explanation of the proposed antenna design, the third section is concerned with the imulation and
measurement results of the proposed antenna, the final section summarises the main findings of this research.
2. ANTENNA DESIGN CONFIGURATION
This Section explains the configuration of the proposed antenna design. The proposed antenna here
is formed by one OMYA and two covers which are placed above the OMYA. The first stage is to consider
the specifications of the proposed antenna based on its application as tabulated in Table 1.
Table 1. Antenna design parameters
Antenna Parameters Values
Frequency Range 5.725 GHz–5.875 GHz
Centre Frequency 5.8 GHz
Bandwidth (BW) 150 MHz
VSWR ≤ 2.0
Radiation Pattern Broadside Directional
The proposed antenna in this paper comprises two double positive (DPS) substrates in which acts as
superstrate layer. Figure 1 shows the OMYA structure which was first demonstrated experimentally by
Quzwain et al [14]. The antenna was designed by using the same design rules as used in the conventional
microstrip Yagi Uda antenna which is composed of a reflector element, a driven element and some director
elements. Detailed explanations of the OMYA design can be found in [14]. The OMYA was fabricated on
rogers 5880 with thickness of 1.575 mm. The antenna consists of two reflector elements (Rt & Rb), one driven
element (DR), two bottom director elements (D1b & D2b) and two top director elements (D1t & D2t).
Side View
X
Z
Y
Ground Plane
Substrate (εr)
Front View
X
Y
Z
D1b
D1t D2t
D2b
Rt
Substrate (εr)
S
g
Mt
Mt
Wd
h
Rb
Rb
D1b D2b
DR
DR
Wd
WR
Wf
y0
Lf
LP
Wd
WP SD
Figure 1. The OMYA geometry in [14]
A periodic structure of two or more DPS materials can be used to increase the gain. This
arrangement is also called one-dimensional photonic crystal (1-D PCs) [20], [21]. It is the simplest structure
among the three types of photonic crystal (PCs) in which comprises more than one DPS Material which is
separated by air gap (h3) in periodic arrangement of z-axis as illustrated in Figure 2. This concept involves
the addition of two high dielectric permittivity substrates on the top of the MPA [22], [23]. As shown in
Figure 2, two additional substrates with dielectric permittivity of εr2 and thickness of t are placed above the

Bulletin of Electr Eng & Inf ISSN: 2302-9285 
Implementation of double-layer loaded on octagon microstrip yagi antenna (Kamelia Quzwain)
3291
antenna at height of h2. The separation distance between two superstrate layers is h3. Multiple superstrates
method can be used to produce a narrow-beam radiation pattern when [24]:
𝑛0ℎ2
𝜆0
√1 =
𝑠𝑖𝑛2𝜃𝑝
(𝑛0)2 = 0.05 (1)
and
𝑛1𝑡
𝜆0
√1 =
𝑠𝑖𝑛2𝜃𝑝
(𝑛1)2 = 0.25 (2)
Where θP is beam angle and the refraction of air (n0) equals to one and the refraction of superstrate (n1) can
be determined as.
𝑛1 = √ε1μ1 (3)
Two Arlon AD1000 materials with εr of 10.2 and thickness of 2.5 mm were used as DPS layer. A
number of optimizations was done through CST Microwave Studio software in order to achieve the best
result for gain based on h2 and h3 variation. The simulated gain results was observed in order to explore the
relationship between the gain and the air gaps (h2 and h3).
Figure 2. The designed OMYA with double DPS layer geometry
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In order to achieve a high gain and wide bandwidth, the OMYA was calculated and optimized by
Quzwain et al in [14]. They explained that the side length of octagon-shaped (Wd) and gap between parasitic
elements (g) give influence on gain and bandwidth of the OMYA. The first observation is the influence of
placing single layer above the OMYA in order to examine the effect of the first air gap thickness (h2) and
superstrate thickness (hss) on gain. In this stage, the single-superstrate was moved vertically to the top with
different superstrate thickness. The variation of the gain with respect to the first air gap thickness (h2) for
different superstrate thickness (hss) is shown in Figure 3. In this simulation result, it shows that a maximum
gain of 12.42 dB can be obtained through this design where the optimum hss for the maximum gain is 2.54
mm at h2 of 31 mm.
It is also clearly seen that the gain moves downward as the hss value decreases. The graph also
shows that the gain rise slightly between h2 of 25 mm and h2 of 31 mm and then decreases slightly. From this
simulation result, it can be summarized that the gain of the OMYA can be enhanced up to 1.22 dB by adding
single-layer configuration above the OMYA. Additionally, it proves that a thick superstrate is capable of

 ISSN: 2302-9285
3292
increasing the gain. Placing double-layer above the OMYA is the final stage in antenna design. In this stage,
two crucial factors influencing the gain frequency characteristics; h2 and h3. In order to further investigate the
effect of h2 and h3 air gaps on the gain, this stage explores the gain variations with changing the h2 value for
different the h3 value and keeping dielectric permittivity of the second superstrate (εr-2SS) equals to the
dielectric permittivity of the first one (εr-1SS). Usually the superstrate is placed half-wavelength (λ0/2) above
the antenna [25] to enhance the gain. Therefore, the starting point of h2 and hSS from the radiating patch of the
OMYA is around 25 mm. Then, the first air gap height of h2 was optimized by varying the value of h2 in
order to achieve the maximum gain. On the other side, the thickness of second air gap (h3) was also
optimized by moving the position of the second superstrate in y-axis which is started at h3 of 1 mm.
Figure 3. Gain variation versus the first air gap thickness (h2) for different superstrate thickness (hss)
Figure 4 depicts the simulated results for this experiment. From this figure, it can be observed that
the gain values for h3 of 3 mm which are shown in black solid line are higher than other lines. A maximum
gain of 13.7 dB can be obtained at h2 of 27 mm, hence there is an extra gain of 1.28 dB after placing another
superstrate above the first superstrate which is separated by air gap. It indicates that the OMYA with double-
layer is able to enhance the gain up to 2.5 dB compared to the OMYA without double-layer. It means that
double superstrate concept can be used to enhance the gain of the OMYA due to the ability to focus the
radiated electromagnetic energy and increase the gain of the OMYA.
Figure 4. Gain variation with changing the first air gap height (h2) for different the second air gap height
(h3)
It can be noted that there is a limit on the values of h2 and h3. The gain will be suppressed if the h2
and h3 values become too large. As a result, the h2 and h3 values for the antenna in this research are 27 mm
and 3 mm, respectively. The simulated S11 of the OMYA with double DPS layer having h2 of 27 mm and h3
of 3 mm is plotted in Figure 5. This plot shows that the antenna works in a frequency band from 5.48 GHz to

3293
6.32 GHz with a center frequency of 5.8 GHz and a wide bandwidth of 840 MHz or 14.5% in fractional
bandwidth.
Figure 6 portrays the simulated radiation patterns 3-Dimensional of the optimized OMYA with
double-layer at 5.8 GHz. Through observing this figure, the OMYA with double-layer has capability to
achieve a maximum gain up to 13.7 dB with the main lobe direction occurs in in E-Plane of 16°. It is
interesting to note that the gain of the OMYA with double-layer is 2.5 dB higher compared to the OMYA
without double-layer in [14], thus it gives evidence that double-layer can be used to enhance the gain. Table 2
summarize the optimized parameters of the OMYA with double-layer.
Table 2. The optimized parameters
Antenna Parameters Dimension (mm)
Air gap (h2) 27
Air gap (h3) 3
Superstrate Thickness (hss) 2.5
Substrate Thickness (h) 1.575
Total height of the proposed antenna (Ht) 39
Total width of the proposed antenna (Wt) 70
Figure 5. The simulated S11 of the OMYA with double-layer Figure 6. The simulated radiation patterns of
OMYA with double-layer
The antenna prototype is shown in Figure 7. It can be seen that two high dielectric permittivity
substrates are placed on the top of the OMYA and fixed using 4 plastic spacers at its 4 corners with plastic
nuts. The two fabricated antennas was measured in order to validate the simulation models. An anechoic
chamber at UTHM EMC Center – Batu Pahat was used to conduct the radiation pattern and gain
measurements. Meanwhile, Anritsu 37347D vector network analyzer (VNA) was used to measure S11.
Figure 7. The prototype of the OMYA with double DPS layer

 ISSN: 2302-9285
3294
Figure 8 plots the computed S11 of the proposed antenna in comparison with the measured S11 result
over frequency range from 4 GHz to 7 GHz. Black solid line corresponds to the measured S11 has value
below -10 dB in a frequency band from 5.45 GHz to 6.6 GHz, thus it has a fractional bandwidth of around
19.8% which is equal to a bandwidth of 1148 MHz. It is obviously seen that there is a discrepancy between
the simulated and measured S11 at upper frequency (fu) which the measured fu is shifted to 6.6 GHz. Hence, a
deviation of 980 MHz occurs at the upper frequency. It may be due to the amount of solder, the
environmental factors such as noise and temperature of the room during measurement. Overall, the measured
bandwidth of the fabricated antenna is wider than its simulated result by 35%.
Figure 8. The simulated and measured S11
The experimental results for the radiation patterns are plotted in Figure 9. Black solid and dotted
lines denote the measured and simulated radiation patterns, respectively. Figure 9 provides far field
directivity of the antenna. With respect to Figure 9 (a), it shows the E-Plane of the antenna prototype has
maximum radiation at an angle of about 10° from broadside direction. On the other side, Figure 9 (b) shows
the H-Plane of the proposed antenna. It can be observed that there is a small shift between the computed and
the experimental results which is caused by fabrication imperfections, for instance, inaccuracy in placing the
superstrate, etching process and connector soldering.
According to the measurement results, it was found that the antenna has a gain of 13 dB. It indicates
that a good agreement was achieved between the computed and measured results of the gain for this antenna,
although the measured gain is about 0.7 dB lower than the simulated gain. It can be well observed from the
results that the directive gain of the antenna can be enhanced by using double-layer with a proper choice of
air gap thicknesses of h2 and h3 due to double-layer concept is able to concentrate the radiated waves in a
small angle. However, it is obviously seen that there is a discrepancy between the simulated and measured
S11 and radiation patterns as shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. It may be caused by fabrication
imperfections and the environmental factors such as noise and temperature of the room during measurement.
All the simulation and experimental results are summarized in Table 3.
(a) (b)
Figure 9. Far field directivity (a) E-field and (b) H-field

3295
Table 3. Comparison results of S11, BW, and gain
Antenna Parameters
Centre Freq.
(GHz)
BW
(MHz)
BW
(%)
S11
(dB)
Gain
(dB)
Simulated OMYA
without double-layer (OMYA)
5.8
812 14 -23 11.2
Simulated OMYA
with double-layer
850 14.6 -20.62 13.7
Fabricated OMYA
with double-layer
1148 19.8 -20 13
4. CONCLUSION
The OMYA is overlaid with double-layer was simulated, fabricated and measured in order to
explore the influence of the double-layer on the OMYA performance. According to the simulation and
measurement results, it shows that the double-layer is able to enhance the OMYA performance in term of
gain and BW. The simulation result shows that the maximum fractional bandwidth of the OMYA without
double-layer increased by 0.6% compared to the OMYA is overlaid with double-layer. One interesting
finding is the bandwidth of the measured OMYA prototype is considerably larger than the simulated design.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the bandwidth and gain of the OMYA can be increased by placing
double-layer above the OMYA.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to express their heartfelt gratitude to Ministry of Higher Education and
Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) for financing this research.
REFERENCES
[1] S. M. Shah et al., “A Compact dual-band semi-flexible antenna at 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz for wearable
applications,” Bulettin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1739-1746, 2021, doi:
10.11591/eei.v10i3.226.
[2] H. Lehpame, “Microwave transmission networks - planning, design and deployment,” New York: McGraw-Hill.
2004.
[3] M. Athavale, “Performance Analysis and Effect of Multiuser Interference for Ultra-Wideband Communications,”
M.S. thesis, Departmen Electrical Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, 2008.
[4] A. A. Abdulbari et al., “Design compact microstrip patch antenna with T-Shaped 5G application,” Bulettin of
Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2072-2078, 2021, doi: 10.11591/eei.v10i4.2935.
[5] K. Carver and J. Mink, “Microstrip antenna technology,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol.
29, no. 1, pp. 2-24, January 1981, doi: 10.1109/TAP.1981.1142523.
[6] R. Garg, P. Bhartia, I. Bahl, and A. Ittipiboon, “Microstrip antenna design handbook,” United State of America:
Arthech House, 2000.
[7] V. F. Fusco, “Foundation of antenna theory and techniques,” London: Person Education Limited, 2005.
[8] O. M. Haraz, A. Elboushi, S. A. Alshebeili and A. Sebak, “Dense Dielectric Patch Array Antenna With Improved
Radiation Characteristics Using EBG Ground Structure and Dielectric Superstrate for Future 5G Cellular
Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 2, pp. 909-913, 2014, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2352679.
[9] N. Ghassemi and Sh. Mohanna, “Wideband Microstrip Array Antenna using Aperture Coupled Elements,”
Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium Proceedings, pp. 1177-1179, 2009.
[10] N. Ramli, M. T. Ali, M. T. Islam, A. L. Yusof and S. Muhamud-Kayat, “Aperture-Coupled Frequency and Patterns
Reconfigurable Microstrip Stacked Array Antenna,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, no.
3, pp. 1067-1074, March 2015, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2015.2388781.
[11] N. Bahari, M. F. Jamlos, and M. M. Isa, “Gain Enhancement of Microstrip Patch Antenna using Artificial Magentic
Conductot,” Bulettin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 166-171, 2019, doi:
10.11591/eei.v8i1.1409.
[12] J. Huang and A. C. Densmore, “Microstrip Yagi array antenna for mobile satellite vehicle application,” IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1024-1030, 1991, doi: 10.1109/8.86924.
[13] G. R. DeJean and M. M. Tentzeris, “A New High-Gain Microstrip Yagi Array Antenna With a High Front-to-Back
(F/B) Ratio for WLAN and Millimeter-Wave Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol.
55, no. 2, pp. 298-304, 2007, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2006.889818.
[14] K. Quzwain, A. Ismail, and A. Sali, “Compact High Gain and Wideband Octagon Microstrip Yagi Antenna,”
Electromagnetics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 524-533, 2016, doi: 10.1080/02726343.2016.1236060.
[15] O. Kramer, T. Djerafi and K. Wu, “Vertically Multilayer-Stacked Yagi Antenna With Single and Dual
Polarizations,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1022-1030, 2010, doi:
10.1109/TAP.2010.2041155.

 ISSN: 2302-9285
3296
[16] P. S. Bhatnagar et al., “Experimental study on stacked triangular microstrip antennas,” Electronics Letters, vol. 22,
no. 16, pp. 864-865, Jul. 1986, doi: 10.1049/el:19860591.
[17] D. Jackson and N. Alexopoulos, “Gain enhancement methods for printed circuit antennas,” IEEE Transactions on
Antennas and Propagation, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 976-987, 1985, doi: 10.1109/TAP.1985.1143709.
[18] X. H. Shen, G. A. E. Vandenbosch and A. V. Capelle, “Study of gain enhancement method for microstrip antennas
using moment method,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 227-231, March
1995, doi: 10.1109/8.371990.
[19] K. Quzwain, A. Ismail, and A. Sali, “Octagon fractal microstrip Yagi antenna with a combined DNG and DPS layer
structure,” Microwave and Optical Letters, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1988-1993, 2017, doi: 10.1002/mop.30666.
[20] J. Joannopoulos, S. G. Johnson, J. N. Winn, and R. D. Meade, “Photonic Crystals: Molding The Flow of Light,”
New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
[21] M. Thevenot, C. Cheype, A. Reineix and B. Jecko, “Directive photonic-bandgap antennas,” IEEE Transactions on
Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2115-2122, 1999, doi: 10.1109/22.798007.
[22] E. Yablonovitch, “Inhibited spontaneous emission in solid-state physics and electronics,” Physical Review
Letters, vol. 58, no. 20, pp. 2059-2062, 1987.
[23] B. R. Franciscatto, A. C. Souza, C. Defay, T. T. Trang and T. P. Vuong, “High gain microstrip patch antenna array
using multiple superstrate layers for DSRC applications,” IEEE-APS Topical Conference on Antennas and
Propagation in Wireless Communications APWC, 2012, pp. 736-739, doi: 10.1109/APWC.2012.6324937.
[24] H. Yang and N. Alexopoulos, “Gain enhancement methods for printed circuit antennas through multiple
superstrates,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 860-863, 1987, doi:
10.1109/TAP.1987.1144186.
[25] Hung-Hsuan Lin, Chun-Yih Wu and Shih-Huang Yeh, “Metamaterial enhanced high gain antenna for WiMAX
application,” TENCON 2007 - 2007 IEEE Region 10 Conference, 2007, pp. 1-3, doi:
10.1109/TENCON.2007.4428876.

Implementation of double-layer loaded on octagon microstrip yagi antenna

More Related Content

What's hot (14)

Similar to Implementation of double-layer loaded on octagon microstrip yagi antenna (20)

More from journalBEEI (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Implementation of double-layer loaded on octagon microstrip yagi antenna