SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Implementing and Evaluating the Hospital Guide to
Reducing Medicaid Readmissions
Angel Bourgoin, PhD, James Maxwell, PhD,Amy
Boutwell, MD, MPP, Katie DeAngelis, MPH,
Sarah Genetti, BA,Alyssa Thomas, BA
Background
Methods
Initial Results
Significance
Reducing readmissions is a growing priority in the pursuit of the
Triple Aim.While much attention has been paid to Medicare
readmissions, evidence demonstrates that Medicaid adults have the
highest readmission rates of any payer. Some Medicaid agencies are
increasingly implementing payment penalties for readmissions, and the
recent expansion of Medicaid eligibility under the Affordable Care Act
has provided millions of adults with new health coverage. Hospitals
serving large numbers of Medicaid patients have a mounting interest in
adopting strategies to reduce readmissions that address the distinct
needs of this population.
The Guide
In 2014, the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ) published the Hospital
Guide to Reducing Medicaid
Readmissions. This Guide, along
with 13 tools, walks hospitals
through the process of analyzing
their readmissions data, taking an
inventory of their readmissions
efforts, and developing a portfolio
of strategies that includes
hospital-based transitional care
strategies, cross-continuum team
partnerships, and enhanced
services for high-risk patients.
The Project
AHRQ has contracted with JSI to disseminate, implement, and evaluate the
Hospital Guide to Reducing Medicaid Readmissions. JSI is currently working with
six hospitals in Illinois and Maryland to identify how the Guide can be improved
and supported in future implementation, and evaluate its effectiveness in
reducing readmissions.
Evaluation Design
The evaluation uses a mixed methods approach, with quantitative data
on outcome measures, as well as qualitative data to offer additional context
and detail. JSI will document the hospital implementation progress,
experiences in implementing the Guide, and outcomes of implementation
through three surveys (pre-implementation, post-implementation, and post-
sustainment) and through ongoing calls with hospitals throughout the
project. Participating hospitals will provide monthly Medicaid readmissions
data for the project period, as well as 12 months prior for comparison.
The Intervention
The timeline below shows the duration and sequence of activities that
hospitals will participate in during this project.The intervention is
composed of a 7 month implementation period and 6 month sustainment
period.The implementation phase includes 1) participation in a learning
collaborative hosted by participants’ respective hospital associations that
introduces them to the Guide, and 2) biweekly one-on-one calls between
the project team and hospitals for mentored implementation, culminating
in an in-person learning session. Hospitals are not expected to implement
every strategy mentioned in the Guide, but to select those strategies that
will be germane to the findings from their data analyses and current efforts
and resources. Hospitals will continue implementing their readmission
reduction strategies independently during the sustainment period.
Research Questions
In order to understand the utility of the Guide and improve upon it,
the evaluation is guided by three research questions:
• RQ1. Feedback. – How feasible and useful are the Guide’s tools and
strategies to hospitals? What areas of improvement for the Guide
do hospitals and other stakeholder audiences identify?
• RQ2.Adoption – To what extent did the implementation hospitals
adopt tools and strategies from the Guide over the implementation
period? What factors affect their adoption of tools and strategies?
• RQ3. Impact – What is the impact of the adoption of the Guide’s
strategies and tools on Medicaid readmissions and related
outcomes? What factors influence their effectiveness?
At this point in the project, there are some promising findings with
regard to feedback and adoption of readmission reduction strategies:
• Feedback. Hospitals have responded very positively to the Guide
and tools, describing them as useful for spurring and guiding
improvements to their readmission reduction efforts. Some
recommendations for improvement were to offer increased
guidance for specific staff roles in using the Guide, more cohesion
between the Guide and tools, and content/format changes that
would allow greater ease of use.
• Adoption. Hospitals have varied widely in terms of the strategies
they have pursued, ranging from a focus on hospital-based care
transitions for all patients to developing emergency department-
based care plans for high-utilizers. The portfolio development tool
was especially useful in planning which strategies were of highest
priority, which could then be communicated to senior leadership.
Each hospital has made progress on their selected strategies during
the mentored implementation period, and are anticipated to make
continued progress during the sustainment period.
A final report, presentation, and revised Guide are expected
Summer-Fall 2016.‘
This project is funded by AHRQ (Contract No. HHSA290201000034I).
The driver diagram below, taken from the Guide, illustrates how the six
sections of the Guide work towards the objective of reducing
readmissions among Medicaid patients.

More Related Content

PPTX
Shared Care Plan Trials - Progress to Date
PPSX
Training medical policy program final version 3
PPT
Educationg Physicians in Training about Resource Utilization and their Own Ou...
PDF
PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean," Part I
PPTX
Initial Medical Policy and Model Coverage Guidelines
PPT
Eduating Physicians in Training About Resource Utiliztion and Their Own Outco...
PPT
Improving the Quality of Care in General Practice
PDF
weems-Texas Medicaid Health Home Pilot Project Evaluation Methods
Shared Care Plan Trials - Progress to Date
Training medical policy program final version 3
Educationg Physicians in Training about Resource Utilization and their Own Ou...
PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean," Part I
Initial Medical Policy and Model Coverage Guidelines
Eduating Physicians in Training About Resource Utiliztion and Their Own Outco...
Improving the Quality of Care in General Practice
weems-Texas Medicaid Health Home Pilot Project Evaluation Methods

What's hot (20)

PDF
Leveraging Patient Support Programs in Biologic-Biosimilar Competitive Landscape
PDF
Improving Study Start Up and Recruitment for a Drug-Device Clinical Trial Cas...
PPT
Ian Graham Regenstrief Conference Slides October 4 2007
PPT
Letourneau Maine Learning the ABCs of APCs
PPTX
Patient Centered Care | Unit 9b Lecture
PPT
ASSET Connected Care
PPTX
Dan Wellings' HARC presentation
PDF
Centers of Excellence in Monitoring and Evaluation: An Approach to Improving ...
PDF
The Open Data era in health and social care, pop up uni, 12.00, 3 september 2015
PPTX
A care coordination handout
PPT
Marshall Chin Regenstrief Qi Disparities Slides
PPT
David Haggstrom Regenstrief Conference Slides
PPTX
Assessing Adherence to Treatment: A Partnership
PPT
Deborah Schaler - EHPR 2014 - Patient Feedback Research
PPT
Neale Chumbler Regenstrief 2007 Presentation
PPT
Continuing Medical Education in Emerging Market
PPTX
Cadth symposium 2015 d3 pro presentation apr 2015 - for deb
PDF
Precepting a whole new world poster 2015 final
PPTX
Readiness to Train Assessment Tool™ - National Launch
PDF
Improve Adherence and Enhance Patient Engagement (Preview)
Leveraging Patient Support Programs in Biologic-Biosimilar Competitive Landscape
Improving Study Start Up and Recruitment for a Drug-Device Clinical Trial Cas...
Ian Graham Regenstrief Conference Slides October 4 2007
Letourneau Maine Learning the ABCs of APCs
Patient Centered Care | Unit 9b Lecture
ASSET Connected Care
Dan Wellings' HARC presentation
Centers of Excellence in Monitoring and Evaluation: An Approach to Improving ...
The Open Data era in health and social care, pop up uni, 12.00, 3 september 2015
A care coordination handout
Marshall Chin Regenstrief Qi Disparities Slides
David Haggstrom Regenstrief Conference Slides
Assessing Adherence to Treatment: A Partnership
Deborah Schaler - EHPR 2014 - Patient Feedback Research
Neale Chumbler Regenstrief 2007 Presentation
Continuing Medical Education in Emerging Market
Cadth symposium 2015 d3 pro presentation apr 2015 - for deb
Precepting a whole new world poster 2015 final
Readiness to Train Assessment Tool™ - National Launch
Improve Adherence and Enhance Patient Engagement (Preview)
Ad

Viewers also liked (19)

PPT
Research Method
PDF
Gerald-Maxwell
PPTX
Detroit party buses
PPTX
Presentación1 estefania
PDF
Aprende a crear una cuenta en Tumblr
PPT
revolucio francesa
PDF
Desafios de las empresas en Colombia
PDF
Edexcel Level 2_Diploma
PPSX
El Reegae 3ºC
PPTX
HP : Couteau suisse ..devenez caméléon
PPT
ve algo nuevo
PDF
Brochure virtual Proyetech Colombia
PDF
Relleno y compactacion para hoyos de postes y retenidas rev 0
PDF
Gentri heights subd house and lot for sale in Cavite, affordable housing in c...
PPT
Formal and informal finance systems
PPT
Ancient river civilisations
PDF
Prehistory in the iberian peninsula
PDF
BQC Aug 2012
KEY
Siosi
Research Method
Gerald-Maxwell
Detroit party buses
Presentación1 estefania
Aprende a crear una cuenta en Tumblr
revolucio francesa
Desafios de las empresas en Colombia
Edexcel Level 2_Diploma
El Reegae 3ºC
HP : Couteau suisse ..devenez caméléon
ve algo nuevo
Brochure virtual Proyetech Colombia
Relleno y compactacion para hoyos de postes y retenidas rev 0
Gentri heights subd house and lot for sale in Cavite, affordable housing in c...
Formal and informal finance systems
Ancient river civilisations
Prehistory in the iberian peninsula
BQC Aug 2012
Siosi
Ad

Similar to Implementing and Evaluating the Hospital Guide to Reducing Medicaid Readmissions (20)

DOCX
Clinical Assignment Quality Improvement Final Project Goal
PDF
Implementing Clinical Pathways: 7 Steps, Importance & Challenges | Visionary ...
DOCX
4508 Final Quality Project Part 2 Clinical Quality Measur.docx
DOCX
4508 Final Quality Project Part 2 Clinical Quality Measur
PPTX
Evaluation of health services
PPTX
at-mod-3-info.pptx
PDF
A review of the total knee replacement pathway: Integrated care is quality care
DOCX
Marita Schifalacqua, RN, MSN, NEA-BC, FAAN,Chris Costello, M.docx
PDF
Improving Your Practice1
PDF
NCQA_Future Vision for Medicare Value-Based Payments Final
PDF
Behavioral Health Specialist Meeting: Keeping You in the Loop
PDF
Health IT Summit Houston 2014 - Case Study "EHR Optimization for Organization...
DOCX
You will collaborate with two of your classmates to share ideas and
PPTX
Healthcare transition in GCC: Current Painful Realities & Proposed Strategic ...
PDF
WhitePaper_VBP_FINAL
PPTX
6052 Wk 10 Assignment.pptx on EBP Changes
DOCX
On April 18, 2016, The United States Supreme Court denied a petiti.docx
PDF
NHS FPX 5004 Assessment 3 Leadership Strategies to Drive Organizational Chang...
PPT
Maureen Charlebois, Chief Nursing Director and Group Director, Canada Health ...
PDF
Microsoft%2520 Word%2520 %2520 Background%2520 Information%2520on%2520 Collab...
Clinical Assignment Quality Improvement Final Project Goal
Implementing Clinical Pathways: 7 Steps, Importance & Challenges | Visionary ...
4508 Final Quality Project Part 2 Clinical Quality Measur.docx
4508 Final Quality Project Part 2 Clinical Quality Measur
Evaluation of health services
at-mod-3-info.pptx
A review of the total knee replacement pathway: Integrated care is quality care
Marita Schifalacqua, RN, MSN, NEA-BC, FAAN,Chris Costello, M.docx
Improving Your Practice1
NCQA_Future Vision for Medicare Value-Based Payments Final
Behavioral Health Specialist Meeting: Keeping You in the Loop
Health IT Summit Houston 2014 - Case Study "EHR Optimization for Organization...
You will collaborate with two of your classmates to share ideas and
Healthcare transition in GCC: Current Painful Realities & Proposed Strategic ...
WhitePaper_VBP_FINAL
6052 Wk 10 Assignment.pptx on EBP Changes
On April 18, 2016, The United States Supreme Court denied a petiti.docx
NHS FPX 5004 Assessment 3 Leadership Strategies to Drive Organizational Chang...
Maureen Charlebois, Chief Nursing Director and Group Director, Canada Health ...
Microsoft%2520 Word%2520 %2520 Background%2520 Information%2520on%2520 Collab...

More from JSI (20)

PDF
VCSP October 2022 Posters.pdf
PPTX
Oral PrEP Webinar Session II - Lesotho
PPTX
Oral PrEP Webinar Session I - Lesotho
PPTX
PrEP E-learning Discussion II
PPTX
Oral PrEP E-learning: Discussion Session 1
PPTX
PrEP Learning Discussion II
PPTX
Oral PrEP E-learning: Discussion Session
PPTX
PrEP E-Learning Discussion 2
PPTX
PrEP E-Learning Discussion I
PPTX
Ghana Single Slide Stories
PPTX
Supporting Survivors in Sierra Leone
PPTX
Implementing ETP and SS: The Liberia Experience
PPTX
Ebola Transmission Prevention and Survivor Services Program, Guinea
PPT
Index Testing & Key Populations in Ghana
PPTX
HIV Index Testing: The USAID DISCOVER-Health Project Experience in Zambia
PDF
Root Cause Analysis: A Community Engagement Process for Identifying Social De...
PDF
Setting Them up for Failure: Why Parents Struggle to Adhere to Infant Safe Sl...
PDF
Binge-Free 603: What's Your Reason? Preventing Binge Drinking in Young Adults...
PDF
USAID Community Capacity for Health Program (Mahefa Miaraka)
PDF
USAID Community Capacity for Health Program (Mahefa Miaraka): Re-engaging Pop...
VCSP October 2022 Posters.pdf
Oral PrEP Webinar Session II - Lesotho
Oral PrEP Webinar Session I - Lesotho
PrEP E-learning Discussion II
Oral PrEP E-learning: Discussion Session 1
PrEP Learning Discussion II
Oral PrEP E-learning: Discussion Session
PrEP E-Learning Discussion 2
PrEP E-Learning Discussion I
Ghana Single Slide Stories
Supporting Survivors in Sierra Leone
Implementing ETP and SS: The Liberia Experience
Ebola Transmission Prevention and Survivor Services Program, Guinea
Index Testing & Key Populations in Ghana
HIV Index Testing: The USAID DISCOVER-Health Project Experience in Zambia
Root Cause Analysis: A Community Engagement Process for Identifying Social De...
Setting Them up for Failure: Why Parents Struggle to Adhere to Infant Safe Sl...
Binge-Free 603: What's Your Reason? Preventing Binge Drinking in Young Adults...
USAID Community Capacity for Health Program (Mahefa Miaraka)
USAID Community Capacity for Health Program (Mahefa Miaraka): Re-engaging Pop...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
BHARATIYA NAGARIKA SURAKSHA SAHMITA^J2023 (1).pptx
PPTX
Portland FPDR Oregon Legislature 2025.pptx
PPTX
DFARS Part 253 - Forms - Defense Contracting Regulations
PDF
PPT Item # 9 - FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget.pdf
PDF
2024-Need-Assessment-Report-March-2025.pdf
PPTX
ANALYSIS OF THE PROCLAMATION OF THE PHILIPPHINE INDEPENDENCE.pptx
PPTX
20231018_SRP Tanzania_IRC2023 FAO side event.pptx
PDF
Building Bridges (of Hope) over Our Troubled Waters_PART 1
PDF
Item # 5 - 5307 Broadway St final review
PDF
Redefining Diplomacy: Françoise Joly on Navigating a Multipolar Order
PPTX
True Fruits_ reportcccccccccccccccc.pptx
PPTX
Parliamentary procedure in meeting that can be use
PPTX
Core Humanitarian Standard Presentation by Abraham Lebeza
PDF
The GDP double bind- Anders Wijkman Honorary President Club of Rome
PPTX
LUNG CANCER PREDICTION MODELING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK.pptx
PPTX
Part I CSO Conference and AVP Overview.pptx
PPTX
Developing_An_Advocacy_Agenda_by_Kevin_Karuga.pptx
PDF
ESG Alignment in Action - The Abhay Bhutada Foundation
PDF
CXPA Finland Webinar - Modern Components of Service Quality - Alec Dalton - ...
PPTX
Workshop-Session-1-LGU-WFP-Formulation.pptx
BHARATIYA NAGARIKA SURAKSHA SAHMITA^J2023 (1).pptx
Portland FPDR Oregon Legislature 2025.pptx
DFARS Part 253 - Forms - Defense Contracting Regulations
PPT Item # 9 - FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget.pdf
2024-Need-Assessment-Report-March-2025.pdf
ANALYSIS OF THE PROCLAMATION OF THE PHILIPPHINE INDEPENDENCE.pptx
20231018_SRP Tanzania_IRC2023 FAO side event.pptx
Building Bridges (of Hope) over Our Troubled Waters_PART 1
Item # 5 - 5307 Broadway St final review
Redefining Diplomacy: Françoise Joly on Navigating a Multipolar Order
True Fruits_ reportcccccccccccccccc.pptx
Parliamentary procedure in meeting that can be use
Core Humanitarian Standard Presentation by Abraham Lebeza
The GDP double bind- Anders Wijkman Honorary President Club of Rome
LUNG CANCER PREDICTION MODELING USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK.pptx
Part I CSO Conference and AVP Overview.pptx
Developing_An_Advocacy_Agenda_by_Kevin_Karuga.pptx
ESG Alignment in Action - The Abhay Bhutada Foundation
CXPA Finland Webinar - Modern Components of Service Quality - Alec Dalton - ...
Workshop-Session-1-LGU-WFP-Formulation.pptx

Implementing and Evaluating the Hospital Guide to Reducing Medicaid Readmissions

  • 1. Implementing and Evaluating the Hospital Guide to Reducing Medicaid Readmissions Angel Bourgoin, PhD, James Maxwell, PhD,Amy Boutwell, MD, MPP, Katie DeAngelis, MPH, Sarah Genetti, BA,Alyssa Thomas, BA Background Methods Initial Results Significance Reducing readmissions is a growing priority in the pursuit of the Triple Aim.While much attention has been paid to Medicare readmissions, evidence demonstrates that Medicaid adults have the highest readmission rates of any payer. Some Medicaid agencies are increasingly implementing payment penalties for readmissions, and the recent expansion of Medicaid eligibility under the Affordable Care Act has provided millions of adults with new health coverage. Hospitals serving large numbers of Medicaid patients have a mounting interest in adopting strategies to reduce readmissions that address the distinct needs of this population. The Guide In 2014, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) published the Hospital Guide to Reducing Medicaid Readmissions. This Guide, along with 13 tools, walks hospitals through the process of analyzing their readmissions data, taking an inventory of their readmissions efforts, and developing a portfolio of strategies that includes hospital-based transitional care strategies, cross-continuum team partnerships, and enhanced services for high-risk patients. The Project AHRQ has contracted with JSI to disseminate, implement, and evaluate the Hospital Guide to Reducing Medicaid Readmissions. JSI is currently working with six hospitals in Illinois and Maryland to identify how the Guide can be improved and supported in future implementation, and evaluate its effectiveness in reducing readmissions. Evaluation Design The evaluation uses a mixed methods approach, with quantitative data on outcome measures, as well as qualitative data to offer additional context and detail. JSI will document the hospital implementation progress, experiences in implementing the Guide, and outcomes of implementation through three surveys (pre-implementation, post-implementation, and post- sustainment) and through ongoing calls with hospitals throughout the project. Participating hospitals will provide monthly Medicaid readmissions data for the project period, as well as 12 months prior for comparison. The Intervention The timeline below shows the duration and sequence of activities that hospitals will participate in during this project.The intervention is composed of a 7 month implementation period and 6 month sustainment period.The implementation phase includes 1) participation in a learning collaborative hosted by participants’ respective hospital associations that introduces them to the Guide, and 2) biweekly one-on-one calls between the project team and hospitals for mentored implementation, culminating in an in-person learning session. Hospitals are not expected to implement every strategy mentioned in the Guide, but to select those strategies that will be germane to the findings from their data analyses and current efforts and resources. Hospitals will continue implementing their readmission reduction strategies independently during the sustainment period. Research Questions In order to understand the utility of the Guide and improve upon it, the evaluation is guided by three research questions: • RQ1. Feedback. – How feasible and useful are the Guide’s tools and strategies to hospitals? What areas of improvement for the Guide do hospitals and other stakeholder audiences identify? • RQ2.Adoption – To what extent did the implementation hospitals adopt tools and strategies from the Guide over the implementation period? What factors affect their adoption of tools and strategies? • RQ3. Impact – What is the impact of the adoption of the Guide’s strategies and tools on Medicaid readmissions and related outcomes? What factors influence their effectiveness? At this point in the project, there are some promising findings with regard to feedback and adoption of readmission reduction strategies: • Feedback. Hospitals have responded very positively to the Guide and tools, describing them as useful for spurring and guiding improvements to their readmission reduction efforts. Some recommendations for improvement were to offer increased guidance for specific staff roles in using the Guide, more cohesion between the Guide and tools, and content/format changes that would allow greater ease of use. • Adoption. Hospitals have varied widely in terms of the strategies they have pursued, ranging from a focus on hospital-based care transitions for all patients to developing emergency department- based care plans for high-utilizers. The portfolio development tool was especially useful in planning which strategies were of highest priority, which could then be communicated to senior leadership. Each hospital has made progress on their selected strategies during the mentored implementation period, and are anticipated to make continued progress during the sustainment period. A final report, presentation, and revised Guide are expected Summer-Fall 2016.‘ This project is funded by AHRQ (Contract No. HHSA290201000034I). The driver diagram below, taken from the Guide, illustrates how the six sections of the Guide work towards the objective of reducing readmissions among Medicaid patients.