Improvements for DMM in SDN and Virtualization-Based Mobile Network Architecture

International Journal of Mobile Network Communications & Telematics ( IJMNCT), Vol.8, No.1/2/3/4, August 2018
DOI : 10.5121/ijmnct.2018.8401 1
IMPROVEMENTS FOR DMM IN SDN AND
VIRTUALIZATION-BASED MOBILE NETWORK
ARCHITECTURE
Muhammad Dawood 1,2
, Woldemar Fuhrmann 1,2
, and Bogdan V Ghita1
1
Centre for Security, Communications and Network Research, Plymouth University UK
2
Faculty of Computer Science, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt, Germany
ABSTRACT
The (r)evolution of wireless access infrastructure can be described as the convergence of the available
radio communication systems towards a harmonized, more flexible and reconfigurable access system to
match the current and upcoming demands. In recent years Softwarization and Virtualization technologies
have moved from server and network domains to wireless domain and provides new perspectives of
managing mobile networks functionalities. This paper provides evolution of the mobile network
architecture in Software Defined Networking (SDN) and virtualization context and realizes it through the
use of distribution of gateway function approach. Key improvements with proposed approach are to
support efficient mobility management in heterogeneous access environments, remove the chains of IP
preservation and optimal data path management according to application needs. A functional setup
validates and assays the proposed evolution in terms of inter-system handover preparation, interruption
and completion time relative to control plane delay requirements of the 5G networks.
KEYWORDS
Software Defined Mobile Network; Network Functions Virtualization; Inter-System Inter-networking; SDN
based DMM; IP mobility management
1. INTRODUCTION
The rapid growth of mobile data traffic has been widely recognized and reported and the mobile
communications industry is preparing to cope with a 1000x increase of traffic by 2020 over 2010
[1]. More and more people see their handheld devices as an annex of their workspace while on
move and the continuous improvement to the mobile network architecture is becoming
increasingly important to support the performance requirements for the ubiquitous wireless
connections. Specifically to support different levels of Mobile Unit (MU) mobility, future
wireless access infrastructure is required to a) Support integration of heterogeneous Radio Access
Technologies (RATs), the 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) [2] and trusted/untrusted non-3GPP
access types (for example Wireless LAN) efficiently combining multiple simultaneous
connections of MU via multiple access nodes with unified mobility management b) provide
seamless IP mobility for session as well as service continuity as per application needs. c)
maintaining optimal service level quality for services that have different latency requirements
between the MU and the Packet Data Network (PDN); and d) Support optimized mechanisms to
control signaling overhead i.e. Minimize the number of messages required to enable the traffic
exchange between the MU and the PDN.
Current and upcoming wireless communication systems exploit many techniques to meet these
requirements. Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) provide high data rates at low cost within
a limited area. Cellular systems serve wide coverage areas, full mobility and roaming, combining
multiple radio resources and deploying a mix of different radio access networks (RANs),
frequencies, cell sizes with new ways of acquiring, deploying, operating and managing multiple

International Journal of Mobile Network Communications & Telematics ( IJMNCT) Vol.8, No.1/2/3/4, August 2018
2
(RATs). However, the current mobile network architecture is highly hierarchical and centralized,
several limitations have been identified when compared to the always-on network access service
requirements of seamless mobility. With centralized network architecture, since the MU uses the
single address anchored at central IP anchor, user traffic will always need to go first to the home
network and then to the correspondent service node even it is not connected via home access
network, leading to paths that are in general longer than the direct one between the MU and its
correspondent service node. This poses excessive traffic concentration on a single gateway
element and possibly un-optimized routing adding in turn unnecessary delay and wasting
resources. Centralized solutions are probable to have reliability problem, as the central entity is
potentially a single point of failure. Central IP mobility anchor have to deal with higher user
traffic simultaneously, thus need to have enough processing and routing capabilities implies
several scalability and network design problems [3]. To cope with the problems of centralized
mobility management: in a previous work [4] we followed the concept of distributed mobility
management (DMM) in contrast to centralized approach in a hierarchical model. The basic
concept of DMM is the distribution of mobility and IP anchors and select and re-locate when
necessary gateways that are topologically/geographically close to the MU. DMM architecture
solves some of the problems of centralized mobility management, however when a MU moves to
a new set of anchors, due to IP relocation, either tunneling need to be used between initial router
and new router or the active flows have to maintained until the flow is finished. Consequently, it
may lead to a complex process and a high signaling cost.
Further more. due to the growing demand of wireless communications for a wide range of
purposes, wireless network infrastructure requires more flexibly and to make them adaptive to
match the actual demands. In this context during the recent years Software Defined Networking
(SDN) and Virtualization of network functionalities have gained a lot of attention from the
research community and standardization organizations [5-6]. SDN provides flexible ways to
monitor and manage network efficiently with separation of data plane and control plane.
Virtualization allows the hardware infrastructure to be provided as a service by abstraction and
sharing of physical resources. Both technologies have related mechanisms and therefore
complement one another.
In line with these trends we set out to take up the current mobile network architecture what we
refer as Software defined plus virtualization featured Mobile Network (S+ MN), combined with
programmable software instances capable of running on general purpose servers via virtualization
technologies to solve many of issues described above. To limit the potentially huge design space
and the envisioned research towards distribution of gateway functions we focus mainly on
seamless mobility in considered scenario, which include maintaining QoS, smooth handover,
session continuity and sharing across multiple wireless technologies. Although there have been
several proposals in this field as surveyed in [7-10] but these studies have only proposed that
SDN and virtualization of network functions can provide much-needed benefits but have not
shown the details for the evolved architecture. This paper not only proposed the S+ MN
Architecture but also provide realization of core network functions with details of procedure
commonly occur in current mobile networks elaborated with the separation of data and control
plane. To summarize, the main contributions of this paper can be stated as follows:
• Improvements for Software defined Plus virtualization featured Mobile Network (S+
MN) architecture with details of functional elements.
• Description of the procedures of current mobile networks to SDN and wireless
virtualization context using the proposed S Plus controllers; Initial attachment, service
setup and QoS flow marking, inter-system handover and the data plane management in a
distributed manner, etc.

3
• By analysing current research of IP mobility management; the proposed architecture
implied Multipath TCP (MPTCP) functions to remove the chains of IP address
preservation for session continuity during IP anchor relocation without the use of bi-
directional tunnels between the initial and new router and avoiding a large number of
signalling messages.
• Development of a functional validation setup to show the working of S+ MN
architecture, application oriented forwarding of IP traffic through the use of distributed
Data Plane Entities (DPEs) and select the right one for use in the following cases. i) The
MU acts as a server and requires a static IP address for incoming IP flows. Static
anchoring at the initial router will be required. ii) No fixed IP address, i.e. the MU acts as
client, but IP session continuity: No static anchoring at the initial router will be required.
iii) No fixed IP address and no IP session continuity: no static anchoring at the Initial
router will be required.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. The paper first gives an overview of related
concepts and initiatives within Open Networking Foundation (ONF) [11] and 3GPP [12] that are
complement to S+ MN. Then introduces the S+ MN architecture, key features, interpretation of
the internal functions with evolution of procedures of current mobile networks elaborated in SDN
based mobile networks, analysis of current research towards IP mobility management and
proposed improvements. In the next section it provides the functional validation and evaluation of
proposed S+ MN architecture relative to a traditional architecture. The last section concludes the
paper and discuss research directions.
2. RELATED WORK
This section provides an overview of concepts and initiatives with in ONF and 3GPP and that are
relevant, extended or applied for S+ MN Architecture. This (.doc) document may be used as a
template for papers prepared using Microsoft Word.
2.1 SDN AND NETWORK VIRTUALIZATION
SDN features various ways of using software to manage and manipulate network devices in
which the control of gateway functions are lifted up to a logically centralized entity called SDN
controller. The key concept of SDN is the separation of the control and data plane. It provides
flexibility, high rate of innovation, and network programmability that speeds the deployment of
new services. Figure 1 depicts a typical architecture of SDN. The data plane comprises a set of
forwarding devices, (e.g., virtual switches or physical switches). The control plane consists of
SDN controllers such as a Floodlight controller [13] or OpenDaylight controller [14]. The
application plane consists of one or more applications, such as routing, and monitoring
applications. The SDN applications communicate their network requirements towards the
controllers via northbound interfaces such as REST API [15] or Java API [16]. The controllers
communicate with each other using east/westbound interfaces. An open protocol is used to
configure, monitor and manage forwarding devices through southbound interfaces. OpenFlow
[17] protocol is the most extended SDN interface maintained by the Open Networking
Foundation (ONF). The ONF has established the Wireless and Mobile Working Group to explore
how the OpenFlow can adapt for use in mobile networks. In a solution brief [11] they illustrate
the benefits of SDN/OpenFlow with use cases of inter-cell interference management, Mobile
traffic management and envisioned that the SDN/OpenFlow benefits can also be realized
throughout the mobile networks from access to backhaul and to the EPC.

4
Figure 1. Typical Open SDN Architecture
Virtualization on the other hand is a useful technology that allows multiple users to share the
same physical infrastructure by abstracting and decoupling the computing functionalities from
underlying hardware [6]. During recent years virtualization technologies have moved from server
and network domains to virtualization of mobile network functionalities. New applications of
network virtualization can enable a more flexible management of network interconnections and
can potentially enable different resources to coexist on the same virtualized infrastructure. There
are different scopes and perspectives of mobile networks virtualization that are suitable for
different applications and services and can be combined with configurable SDN technologies to
address the challenges identified above in the current mobile network architecture. Both SDN and
virtualization have related mechanisms and therefore could complement one another. Control and
management for computing resources based on virtualization and software defined technologies
has been extensively studied and for cloud computing application is being tested in major field
trials. Using similar logic, recently, many research works have tried to evolve the traditional
mobile network architecture using two of these concepts to deal with the challenges faced by
mobile operators, such as the rapid growth of mobile traffic and new services. As the mobile
medium is an ever-changing environment, there is a need for the virtualization techniques used in
host virtualization to be modified or adapted when applied to mobile network technologies.
2.2 INTER-SYSTEM INTER-NETWORKING
Based on the actual 3GPP specifications [18], the 3GPP’s CN exposes generic, IP-based
interfaces towards the different non-3GPP access networks. With implied pre-registration to
3GPP over non-3GPP access, heterogeneous traffic is enabled to route through the common core
network and subsequently, the EPC services are available to the users. There are several
challenges associated with integration of different RATs such as the provision of a common
authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) scheme, an end-to-end quality of service
(QoS) and seamless handover etc. The QoS provided by the source and target access systems
should be nearly identical to sustain the same communication experience and handover latency

5
should be no more than a few milliseconds etc. 3GPP Technical Specification [19], a study on
architecture for next generation networks with separation of control and data plane, specified in
this context the architectural requirements, key issues and their solutions with functions
descriptions. In this paper the inter-system handover of a MU from a 3GPP access network
towards a non 3GPP access network when adopting SDN and virtualization in mobile networks
and possible improvements for IP mobility management are considered.
2.3 MULTIPATH TCP (MPTCP)
MPTCP is an ongoing effort within Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to support multipath
operation, a set of extensions to enables a regular TCP connection to use multiple different IP
addresses and interfaces [20]. In the mobility context, when MU moves from one point of
attachment (in 3GPP/EPS terminology PGW) to another i.e., it receives or configures a new IP
address through new network attachment. MPTCP enable multiple IP addresses by adding
subflows. Each subflow behaves as a separate regular TCP connection inside the network.
Subflows can be added and removed at any point of time, in any MPTCP ongoing
communication, with the help of ADD_ADDR option and REMOVE_ADDR option for any
interface [20]. To maintain the ongoing communication MPTCP support “make before break”
method and uses MP-PRIO option to specify any subflow as backup mode. In Figure 2, in the
mobility scenario, With the MU have multiple IP addresses so in this case MPTCP can create
multiple subflows and the MU is connected to Packet Data Network (PDN) service. Defined by
MPPRIO option MPTCP support different flow modes, in the single-path mode only one TCP
subflow is used at any time or using all subflows simultaneously between two communication
nodes or uses only a subset of subflows for transmission of data packets. this paper explore the
implied key role of transport layer protocols for IP mobility management by simultaneous
exchange of IP traffic flows through the use of multiple distributed IP anchors.
Figure 2. Multipath TCP multipath operations
3. S+ MOBILE NETWORK ARCHITECTURE
Using the concepts of separation of control data plane, abstraction and sharing of resources we
design an evolution of current mobile network architecture what we refer as Software defined
plus virtualization featured Mobile Network (S+ MN). Figure 3 shows the conceptual view of S+
MN architecture, data plane enables the user traffic to be forwarded through the Access Network

6
(AN) to core network gateways which terminate the traffic to external network. Software defined
Plus virtualization featured Radio access network Controller (S+ AC) and Software defined Plus
virtualization featured core Network Controller (S+ NC) are proposed, the S+ controllers (S+ AC
and S+ NC) can control the physical or virtual resources through programmable interfaces and
have the ability to interact both access as well as forwarding nodes by consolidating redundant
Access Stratum (AS) and Non-Access Stratum (NAS) signaling and management functions. The
interpretation of the functions of the proposed architecture that is used to describe as follows:
The AN comprises the heterogeneous access environment that includes multiple different RATs
links such as LTE (3GPP RAN), Wi-Fi (non 3GPP trusted RAN) and any new AN. The physical
RAN resources can be abstracted and sliced into virtual RAN resources. In such case the new
communication entity S+ Access Node can be presented that includes the collection of logical
components of multiple different RATs nodes. The evolved access nodes directly interact with the
physical radio resources and should enabled by the attributes of SDN (simple OpenFlow switch
shall be added to these devices in order to support Open SDN protocols). The S+ AC shall act as
a network administrator, coordination, policing and configuration of the infrastructure. The
network control information is delivered from S+ AC to access nodes through the standardized
southbound interface, i.e. OpenFlow. S+ AC shall apply access network-wide functions such
admission control, radio resource scheduling, backhaul links management and QoS etc. In
considered context to provide mobility support with Inter-system inter-networking be applied the
MUs can obtain connectivity either from 3GPP or non-3GPP access node and move between
them. Being the research focused on provision of IP session continuity during GW relocation and
due to the paper length limitations, we cannot delve into details of S+ AN and mainly describe the
realization of S+ core network.
Figure 3. Conceptual view of S+ Mobile Network Architecture

7
The Core network of S+ MN is composed of simple network gateways in contrast to legacy EPC,
explicitly separate the data plane from control plane. Furthermore, it applied the distribution of
gateway function. S+ NC manage the forwarding paths, calculates, installs rules into the user
forwarding elements, path management, tunnel management, etc. In the following we provide
details of S+ MN core network with evolution of procedure of current mobile networks
elaborated with the separation of data and control plane.
4. REALIZATION OF S+ MN CORE NETWORK
The realization of S+ MN core network architecture is depicted in Figure 4, the S+ NC is the
brain of the operations. All CN control functions are realized as set of control plane applications
(using 5G terminologies Access and Mobility Management Functions (AMF), Session
Management Function (SMF) and Policy Control Function (PCF) running on top of the S+ NC.
The application uses the northbound interface to access the substrate from the S+ NC. Depending
on the implementation of control plane and requirements of supported services these applications
can have different functionalities. The AMF control function, can interact with subscription and
content server named S+ DS to create a local copy for user authentication and authorization. For
mobility management AMF tracks and updates the user’s location information as well as their
requirements. It delegates various event to S+ access node such as initial context setup request
and response for user attachment. AMF sends paging message to each access node belonging to
the Tracking Area (TA) where the MU is registered and can also interact with SMF directly and
PCF indirectly to support user session setup.
Figure 4. Conceptual view of S+ Mobile Network Architecture

8
The SMF inherits the control functions performed by the PGW such as IP assignments,
configuration of data plane path, selection and control of appropriate data plane entity, data plane
management in a distributed manner, re-selection of DPEs, and QoS provisions etc. The SMF
needs to interact with the PCF to get the corresponding policies in the case where the session
requires a specific QoS policies. The AMF and SMF function will use a northbound interface
(e.g., REST API) with the S+ NC which translates northbound messages into OpenFlow
messages. When the flow rules are associated for subsequent packets that belong to the same
section and installs them for the data plane. Furthermore, in order to support fully flexible IP flow
mobility during DPE relocation AMF and SMF applications can have additional functionalities.
Such as, provide distinct ID address for each flow. The default flow, if required, is anchored in
the core at initial DPE with a fixed IP address of the user so that the user is always reachable for
incoming requests. Other IP flows may be anchored with temporary IP addresses at local DPEs
supporting session continuity when needed and decided upon by the user. For application oriented
forwarding setup, change the forwarding rules of the data plane switches for a specific flows or
for all flows of the handled MU.
Distribution of gateway function approach has been followed to avoid unnecessary longer data
path and evolved with SDN technology. Using 3GPP terminology each DPE implements Data
Plane Serving Gateway (D-SGW) or Data plane PDN Gateway (D-PGW) functions and
communicates with an S+ NC through OpenFlow protocol that implements the southbound
interface. DPEs use the flow rules received from the S+ NC and have standard mobile network
tunnel processing capabilities with a GTP-U extension (e.g., encapsulation/decapsulation
facilities) and forward packets to the transport network. Data plane may also include the key
functionality of a wireless access node, such as interfacing to manage mapping between QoS
flows and Data radio bearers (DRBs). During an inter system handover or DPE relocation, the S+
NC needs to send OpenFlow Packet Out messages to the source as well as target DPE in order to
modify their flow tables at the same time.
5. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
We discuss a scenario used to explain the behavior is the inter-system handover of a MU from a
3GPP access network towards a non 3GPP access network and describe the important call control
flows being exchanged across the various network elements of the proposed architecture to show
how it can be systematically exploited to gain benefits:
5.1 INITIAL ATTACHMENT PROCEDURE
Figure 5 shows the signalling diagram of initial attachment, illustrating an expression of proposed
architecture. The 3GPP/LTE compliant evolved access node S+ eNB receives an attachment
request message (1) from MU. This message is embedded in an OpenFlow Initial User message
(2) and is sent to the S+ NC, where the proposed AMF application initiates MU authentication
and fetches users’ subscription profile from S+ DS. After the successful authentication and
authorization, the OpenFlow Initial Context Setup Request message (3) is sent from the S+ NC to
the S+ eNB. The S+ eNB reconfigures the radio connection, and forward the attach accept
message to the MU. The acknowledgment of attach complete from MU is included by S+ eNB as
context setup response message (4) to the controller. The state of MU transitions from
deregistered to registered and transmits the first session packet to the S+ eNB over the radio
connection. Since, there is no matching flow entry in the flow table of the S+ eNB. The S+ eNB
triggers an OpenFlow packet-in message (5) to the S+ NC. This message includes some
information that is necessary to establish the data plane. The S+ NC analyse the packet header to
obtain the session information such as the source and destination nodes IP addresses and collects
the transport marking information. S+ NC assign the DPE by interacting with the SMF
applications. In turn the MU obtain an IP address from SMF, this also includes as conferred in

9
[21] creating Binding Cache Entry (BCE) to keep track the MU’s location as well as the related
information. Then, the S+ NC creates flow rules for subsequent packets that belong to the same
section and send them as OpenFlow packet-out message (6) to installs them for the S+ eNB and
DPE. In the case where the session requires a specific QoS policy, the S+ NC needs to interact
with the PCF to get the corresponding policies before downloading the flow rules to the data
plane. When the flow rules are associated with a QoS parameter, the S+ NC will install them at
the DPE. Furthermore, considering the expected handover with MU mobility, The AMF in
cooperation with the SMF notify the needed support for DPE relocation and keep the established
PDN-Connection context. At the end of this procedure, the MU state is transitioned from Idle to
Connected and a data forwarding path is established from the MU to the correspondent PDN
service.
Figure 5. Initial attachment operation
5.2 INTER-SYSTEM HANDOVER
As shown in Figure 6, the MU is initially connected to 3GPP access network, when the MU
moves away from source S+ eNB and determine the presence of appropriate access node (in this
case a non-3gPP AP), S+ eNB sends a Handover required message packaged in an OpenFlow
message to the S+ NC (1). The AMF function in turn trigger the handover by sending a Handover
Request message (2) to the target non-3GPP compliment access node (S+ AP). If targeted S+ AP
response with handover ACK message (3) to the S+ NC, the handover command (4) is send
toward the MU by S+ NC and then MU trigger the attachment procedure (Access technology
specific procedure for the interworking of the 3GPP and non-3GPP access networks) [18]. After

10
attachment S+ NC receives packet-in message (5) from S+ AP and it must connect a set of
appropriate DPE that is close to the MU. Together with this procedure MU gets a new IP address
to be used in the new flow. S+ NC allocates new IP address to MU and have to establish a data
forwarding path according to application needs.
Figure 6. S+ MN based inter-system handover
5.3 INTER-SYSTEM HANDOVER
There have been several approaches for IP mobility management in SDN based mobile networks,
as surveyed in [21, 22], In, [21] the author applied the SDN concept to DMM architecture for
routing optimization with a DMM service within SDN controller. In proposed architecture, when
a user attach initiate router, the SDN controller stored user information in Binding cache entry
(BCE). If the user moves to the new router, the controller which receives packet-in message will
check BCE. Mobility management is supported to user by binding update with DMM service. The
new data path is set by SDN controller and it sends Flow Modify message to previous and new
router. On receiving flow modify messages, the routers will update their flow tables. That is, user
can be supported optimized path by flow table, without tunneling. But It is noted that after
handover, first, the packets have to follow the route from the previous to the new router. The
packets are then redirected between the new router and fInally to the user. Consequently, it may
lead to a complex process and a high signaling cost.
In [22], the author considered two schemes for mobility management in DMM scenario called
Tunneling mode and Optimal mode DMM, in first scheme different prefixes are allocated to user
at old and each new attachment nodes. For the ongoing flows which require mobility support, the
list of old and new prefixes are included in packet-out message named router advertisement
message. The controller updates the forwarding rules at both old and new OpenFlow switches
(OFSs). Using tunneling mechanism the flows are being redirected between distributed OFSs. In

11
second scheme, the controller calculates the new route for the on-going flows and populates the
new forwarding rules to all the intermediate OFSs along the new route between the new OFS and
the Correspondent Node (CN). In other words, an explicit path between the user node and CN is
defined and established by the controller. In this way, tunneling mechanism can be avoided.
However, it may lead to a complex task giving the large number of switches/flows to handle.
Besides, the simplicity of the first scheme can come at the cost of tunneling overhead and sub-
optimal routing. the authors indicated that the optimal mode is likely more suitable for latency
sensitive services while the tunnel mode seems to be better for the packet loss-and interruption-
sensitive services.
To fully appreciate these particular challenges associated with IP mobility, the proposed
architecture implied MPTCP at transport layer. Since MPTCP does not change the socket API, it
can be used transparently by any PDN service and change of IP address of a MU does not force
the connection to be restarted. A combination of SDN capabilities and MPTCP options could be
used to remove the chains of IP preservation of current mobility management solutions and
disburden the process of flow forwarding during DPE relocation. With implied MPTCP
connection of MPTCP capable MU and PDN-Service and will be able to synchronize the MU
traffic using different IP addresses. As shown in figure 7, the S+ NC can manage different cases
of IP flows, the data packets from service requiring static IP anchoring are directed to initial flow,
so the MU is enabled to keep the initially assigned IP address despite its location changes and
where no static anchoring is required, the MU uses the new flow for active communication, while
maintaining the reachability for the IP address that is still in use. In this way the need for the
maintaining a tunnel between source and target anchors and flow redirection is not required to
link different flows, leading in turn to seamlessly session continuity during DPEs relocation
avoiding a large number of signalling messages. The S+ NC monitor the MU activity, as no
traffic is carried in the initial subflow (during the timer interval) it starts the releases procedure for
the removal of initial IP address from the PDN-S1 IP list. The release cause tag along the session
management and perform the DPE binding information update.
Figure 7. S Flow setup to application needs

12
6. FUNCTIONAL VALIDATION
To evaluate the working and key benefits of the proposed S+ Mobile Network architecture, we
developed an ns–3-based system level simulation test setup, which primarily consists of point to
point helper, network, applications, mobility and core modules. Besides this, OFSwitch13 module
[23] has been implemented in ns-3 simulator that enable support for OpenFlow protocol version
1.3. we extended the NS3 environment to implement instantiation of multiple DPEs and modified
the currently deployed X2-based handover procedure of the NS3 to support relocation of DPE
during the MUs handover. It implements the messages exchange between the different network
functions for inter-system handover and DPE relocation enforcing the policies and the behaviour
described in section 5.1 and 5.2. The source code of implemented modules is available via [24].
The logical network topology of the evaluation scenario is shown in Figure 4. The simulation
starts with a MU initially attached to the PDN service 1 via 3GPP compliant access network.
Moving out of S+ eNB coverage area the MU discovers and switches to non- 3GPP compliant
access connection. We set the parameters for simulation in which data packets are set to 1000
units and simulation interval is 10ms. For each handover case, we measured the preparation,
interruption and completion time. Figures 8a and 8b depicts the measured handover execution
time, whose estimated latency values were around 5.7 ms and 7.47 ms, respectively. These results
fulfil the control plane delay requirements of the 5G networks.
Figure 8a. Inter-system handover execution time
Figure 8b. Inter-system handover measurements

13
7. CONCLUSIONS
This paper presented evolution of the mobile network architecture in SDN and virtualization
context and provided improvements for DMM to enable seamless handover while roaming across
heterogeneous access networks, novel perspective to maintain session continuity during the
movement of MU that tag along with DPE relocation. The MPTCP protocol is implied to remove
the chains of IP preservation of current mobility management solutions, leading in turn to
seamlessly change the IP address during a connection without breaking and re-establishing the
connection. A functional validation setup has been devolved to show the working of proposed
improvements. The pictorial call control flows thus created has managed different cases of IP
flows and shown a significant decrease in signalling and delay compared to tunnel and routing
based approaches of IP mobility management. The simulation results show that the proposed
evolutions efficiently fulfill the functionality and performance requirements (e.g., seamless
mobility management, setting up traffic redirection path and maximum allowed delay) during
inter-system handover. In future work we intend to perform more detailed experiment with
MPTCP to illustrate further system realization of the architecture presented.
REFERENCES
[1] Index, C., Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2016–2021.
2017.
[2] 3GPP, TS 36.300, Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal
Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN). 2018.
[3] H. Chan, D.L., P. Seite, H. Yokota, J. Korhonen, , IETF RFC 7333 "Requirements for DMM 2014.
[4] Dawood, M., F. Woldemar, and B. Ghita, Assay of Multipath TCP for Session Continuity in
Distributed Mobility Management., in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Network Conference
(INC 2016) Frankfurt am Main Germany. 2016.
[5] Nguyen, V.-G., T.-X. Do, and Y. Kim, SDN and Virtualization-Based LTE Mobile Network
Architectures: A Comprehensive Survey. Wireless Personal Communications, 2016. 86(3): p. 1401-
1438.
[6] Barona López, L.I.; Valdivieso Caraguay, Á.L.; Sotelo Monge, M.A.; García Villalba, L.J. Key
Technologies in the Context of Future Networks: Operational and Management Requirements. Future
Internet 2017, 9, 1
[7] Karimzadeh, M., L. Valtulina, and G. Karagiannis, Applying sdn/openflow in virtualized lte to
support distributed mobility management (dmm), in The 4th international conference on cloud
computing and services science (CLOSER) 2014. p. 1–6.
[8] Sama, M.R., et al. Enabling network programmability in LTE/EPC architecture using OpenFlow. in
Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), 2014 12th
International Symposium on. 2014.
[9] Yaz, V., U.C. Kozat, and M.O. Sunay, A new control plane for 5G network architecture with a case
study on unified handoff, mobility, and routing management. IEEE Comm. Magazine, 2014. 52(11):
p. 76-85.
[10] Sama, M.R., et al., Software-defined control of the virtualized mobile packet core. IEEE
Communications Magazine, 2015. 53(2): p. 107-115.
[11] ONF, OpenFlow Enabled Mobile and Wireless Networks, ONF Solution Brief. 2013.
[12] 3GPP Scope and Objectives. 2017; Available from: http://www.3gpp.org/
[13] Project Floodligt: an Open SDN Controller. Available from:
http://www.projectfloodlight.org/floodlight/
[14] OpenDaylight: Open Source SDN Platform. Available from: https://www.opendaylight.org/

14
[15] Richardson, L., M. Amundsen, and S. Ruby, RESTful Web APIs. 2013: O'Reilly Media, Inc. 408.
[16] Java API Specifications. Available from: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/api-141528.html
[17] ONF, TS-020: OpenFlow switch specification version 1.5.1.
[18] 3GPP, TS 23.402 Architecture enhancements for non-3GPP accesses. 2016.
[19] 3GPP, TS 23 799; Study on Architecture for Next Generation System. 2016.
[20] Ford, A., et al., TCP Extensions for multipath operation with multiple addresses, in RFC 6824, IETF.
2013.
[21] Hyunsik Yang , K.S., Younghan Kim, IETF RFC: Routing Optimization with SDN.
[22] Nguyen, T.T., C. Bonnet, and J. Harri. SDN-based distributed mobility management for 5G networks.
in 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. 2016.
[23] OpenFlow 1.3 module for Ns-3. Available from; http://www.lrc.ic.unicamp.br/ofswitch13/
[24] Dawood, M. and M.S. Shafi. S plus mobile network archtecture implementation. 2018; Available
from: https://github.com/mshary/S-plus-Mobilhe-Network.
AUTHORS
Muhammad Dawood (muhammad.dawood@plymouth.ac.uk) received his master’s
degree in information technology from university of applied sciences Fulda, Germany.
Since 2013 he is researcher at Centre for Security, Communications and Network
Research, University of Plymouth, UK where he is PhD student in future mobile
systems architecture. His current research focus on software defined plus
Virtualization featured Mobile Network architecture for vehicular communications.
Woldemar Fuhrmann (w.fuhrmann@fbi.h-da.de) is Professor in computer sciences
and telecommunications at university of applied sciences Darmstadt, Germany. He is
also director of studies for advance research in telecommunication systems at Centre
for Security, Communications and Network Research
(http://cscan.org/?page=staffprofile&id=13), University of Plymouth, UK. His major
areas of research include mobile communication systems, machine type
communications, and the internet of things.
Bogdan V Ghita (bogdan.ghita@plymouth.ac.uk) is an Associate Professor (Senior
Lecturer) in Computer Networks at the University of Plymouth, UK. From the same
university he received his Ph.D. (2004) degrees in Performance characterisation of IP
Networks. His major areas of research include QoS measurement and provisioning,
user and application profiling and fairness.

Improvements for DMM in SDN and Virtualization-Based Mobile Network Architecture

More Related Content

What's hot (15)

Similar to Improvements for DMM in SDN and Virtualization-Based Mobile Network Architecture (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Improvements for DMM in SDN and Virtualization-Based Mobile Network Architecture