SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Induction
Tyler Murphy
March 17, 2014
Induction is my favorite style of proof. For new students, they hate it. But stop for
a few minutes, take some deep breaths and think about what’s going on. Most induction
proofs (especially those in this class) are very direct and only involve some algebra.
First, let’s look at the basic method of giving a proof by induction.
1. State the problem
2. State how you plan to proceed with the proof.
3. State your base case (n = 1) and show that it is true.
4. State your Inductive Hypothesis. (Assume true for k)
5. Prove that the k+1 case works.
6. State what you proved
Let me give an example of how induction works.
example
Prove that for all n ∈ N,
n
i=1
i =
n(n + 1)
2
Realize first what this is. n
i=1 i = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + n.
So we want to prove
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + n =
n(n + 1)
2
.
1
Proof. By Induction. Base Case: n = 1.
1
?
=
1(1 + 1)
2
=
1(2)
2
=
2
2
= 1.
Since 1=1, our base case holds.
Note that I used
?
= instead of = because I was trying to show that the statements on
the left and right were equal. Using the = sign right away assumes that they are, which is
assuming what you want to prove.
Inductive Hypothesis (I.H.): Assume that 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + k =
k(k + 1)
2
, for k ∈ N.
WTS: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + k + (k + 1) =
(k + 1)(k + 1 + 1)
2
.
Now we have set up the proof. It is time to begin.
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + k + (k + 1)
=
k(k + 1)
2
+ (k + 1)(by I.H.)
=
k(k + 1)
2
+
2(k + 1)
2
=
k(k + 1) + 2(k + 1)
2
=
(k + 1)(k + 2)
2
=
(k + 1)(k + 1 + 1)
2
So we have that
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + k + (k + 1) =
(k + 1)(k + 1 + 1)
2
,
Which is what we wanted to prove. So, we are done.
2

More Related Content

DOCX
Mca1030 foundation of mathematics
PPT
Linear algebra notes 2
PPTX
Historia y evolucion del computador
PDF
Historia y evolución de la computadora
PPT
MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION.ppt
PPTX
Lecture 3_Methods of Proofs (1) Ghana Communication Technology
PDF
A proof induction has two standard parts. The first establishing tha.pdf
Mca1030 foundation of mathematics
Linear algebra notes 2
Historia y evolucion del computador
Historia y evolución de la computadora
MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION.ppt
Lecture 3_Methods of Proofs (1) Ghana Communication Technology
A proof induction has two standard parts. The first establishing tha.pdf

Similar to Induction Notes (20)

DOCX
PROOF TECHNIQUES
PPT
Introduction to Mathematical Induction!!
PPTX
11-Induction CIIT.pptx
PDF
Factorials as sums
PPTX
Induction.pptx
PPTX
Mathematical Induction & Functions_055448.pptx
PPTX
Mathematical Induction & Functions_055448.pptx
PPTX
Proof by contradiction
PDF
Induction.pdf
PPTX
Week 4 Mathematical Induction Mathematical Induction
PDF
Lect 18
PPTX
5.4 mathematical induction t
PDF
Math induction
DOC
Chapter 4 dis 2011
PDF
CHAPTER final.pdf
PPTX
Mathematical induction
PPT
Fskik 1 nota
KEY
1112 ch 11 day 12
PPTX
Slide subtopic 5
PDF
Exam 3 Math 189
PROOF TECHNIQUES
Introduction to Mathematical Induction!!
11-Induction CIIT.pptx
Factorials as sums
Induction.pptx
Mathematical Induction & Functions_055448.pptx
Mathematical Induction & Functions_055448.pptx
Proof by contradiction
Induction.pdf
Week 4 Mathematical Induction Mathematical Induction
Lect 18
5.4 mathematical induction t
Math induction
Chapter 4 dis 2011
CHAPTER final.pdf
Mathematical induction
Fskik 1 nota
1112 ch 11 day 12
Slide subtopic 5
Exam 3 Math 189
Ad

More from Tyler Murphy (20)

PDF
Job application 2020
PDF
The Table Method for Derivatives
PDF
Math 170 notation
PDF
intro to Implicit differentiation
PDF
Tower of hanoi problem
PDF
Intro to derivatives
PDF
One sided limits
PDF
Limits as x approaches infinity
PDF
Computing limits
PDF
Introduction to limits
PDF
Solving a trig equation
PDF
solving a trig problem and sketching a graph example problems
PDF
Finding a polyomial from data
PDF
functions review
PDF
Jason format preferences m170
PDF
Final exam review
PDF
Inclusion exclusion principle
PDF
Oral exam structure M189
DOCX
Class mods
DOCX
Drop trow game rules
Job application 2020
The Table Method for Derivatives
Math 170 notation
intro to Implicit differentiation
Tower of hanoi problem
Intro to derivatives
One sided limits
Limits as x approaches infinity
Computing limits
Introduction to limits
Solving a trig equation
solving a trig problem and sketching a graph example problems
Finding a polyomial from data
functions review
Jason format preferences m170
Final exam review
Inclusion exclusion principle
Oral exam structure M189
Class mods
Drop trow game rules
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PPTX
Orientation - ARALprogram of Deped to the Parents.pptx
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
Yogi Goddess Pres Conference Studio Updates
PPTX
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
PDF
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
PPTX
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
Orientation - ARALprogram of Deped to the Parents.pptx
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Yogi Goddess Pres Conference Studio Updates
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
master seminar digital applications in india
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx

Induction Notes

  • 1. Induction Tyler Murphy March 17, 2014 Induction is my favorite style of proof. For new students, they hate it. But stop for a few minutes, take some deep breaths and think about what’s going on. Most induction proofs (especially those in this class) are very direct and only involve some algebra. First, let’s look at the basic method of giving a proof by induction. 1. State the problem 2. State how you plan to proceed with the proof. 3. State your base case (n = 1) and show that it is true. 4. State your Inductive Hypothesis. (Assume true for k) 5. Prove that the k+1 case works. 6. State what you proved Let me give an example of how induction works. example Prove that for all n ∈ N, n i=1 i = n(n + 1) 2 Realize first what this is. n i=1 i = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + n. So we want to prove 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + n = n(n + 1) 2 . 1
  • 2. Proof. By Induction. Base Case: n = 1. 1 ? = 1(1 + 1) 2 = 1(2) 2 = 2 2 = 1. Since 1=1, our base case holds. Note that I used ? = instead of = because I was trying to show that the statements on the left and right were equal. Using the = sign right away assumes that they are, which is assuming what you want to prove. Inductive Hypothesis (I.H.): Assume that 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + k = k(k + 1) 2 , for k ∈ N. WTS: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + k + (k + 1) = (k + 1)(k + 1 + 1) 2 . Now we have set up the proof. It is time to begin. 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + k + (k + 1) = k(k + 1) 2 + (k + 1)(by I.H.) = k(k + 1) 2 + 2(k + 1) 2 = k(k + 1) + 2(k + 1) 2 = (k + 1)(k + 2) 2 = (k + 1)(k + 1 + 1) 2 So we have that 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + · · · + k + (k + 1) = (k + 1)(k + 1 + 1) 2 , Which is what we wanted to prove. So, we are done. 2