![Use Cases
U.S. Naval Air Systems Command
"[Open technologies] reduce the cost of software development and they
reduce the time in which innovations in software can be incorporated in
systems. 'If the project is of a sufficient scale, you cannot get there without an
open-source approach,' said Dewey Houck, a senior engineer at Boeing, who
spoke at a conference last month about DOD's use of open source."
(Government Computer News, Jan. 2008)"
Key Challenges
• Analyzing flight data to reduce operational risk and improve training (human
error is a causal factor in 70% of aviation mishaps)
Results
• Ability to leverage recorded electronic sensor data to reduce risk and improve
crew performance
Why Pentaho
• Breadth of capabilities
• Proven success and large-scale referenceable deployments
• Successful proof-of-concept
• Dramatically lower costs
Page 46 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/informaticapentahoetltoolscomparison1-12631519641123-phpapp01/85/Informatica-Pentaho-Etl-Tools-Comparison-46-320.jpg)
Informatica Pentaho Etl Tools Comparison
- 1. ETL Tools Comparison Written by: Jonathan Levin March 20, 2008 http://mysqlbarbeque.blogspot.com
- 2. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 2 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 3. Table of Contents • Introduction • What do ETL tools do? • Why use an ETL tool? • ETL tools • Comparison • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 3 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 4. What do ETLs tool do? An ETL tool is a tool that: • Extracts data from various data sources (usually legacy) • Transforms data • from -> being optimized for transaction to -> being optimized for reporting and analysis • synchronizes the data coming from different databases • data cleanses to remove errors • Loads data into a data warehouse Page 4 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 5. Table of Contents • Introduction • What do ETL tools do? • Why use an ETL tool? • ETL tools • Comparison • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 5 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 6. Why use an ETL tool? ETL tools save time and money when developing a data warehouse by removing the need for “hand-coding”. “Hand Coding” is still the most common way of integrating data today. It requires hours and hours of development and expertise to create a Business-Intelligence-System. It is very difficult for data base administrators to connect between different brands of databases without using an external tool. In the event that databases are altered or new databases need to be integrated, a lot of “hand-coded” work needs to be completely redone. Page 6 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 7. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Pentaho Kettle • Talend • Informatica PowerCenter • Inaplex Inaport • Comparison • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 7 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 8. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Pentaho Kettle • Talend • Informatica PowerCenter • Inaplex Inaport • Comparison • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 8 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 9. ETL Tools Pentaho Kettle • Pentaho is a commercial open-source BI suite that has a product called Kettle for data integration. • It uses an innovative meta-driven approach and has a strong and very easy-to-use GUI • The company started around 2001 • It has a strong community of 13,500 registered users • It uses a stand-alone java engine that process the tasks for moving data between many different databases and files Page 9 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 10. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Pentaho Kettle • Talend • Informatica PowerCenter • Inaplex Inaport • Comparison • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 10 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 11. ETL Tools Talend • Talend is an open-source data integration tool • It uses a code-generating approach and uses a GUI (implemented in Eclipse RC) • It started around October 2006 • It has a much smaller community then Pentaho, but is supported by 2 finance companies • It generates Java code or Perl code which can later be run on a server Page 11 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 12. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Pentaho Kettle • Talend • Informatica PowerCenter • Inaplex Inaport • Comparison • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 12 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 13. ETL Tools Informatica PowerCenter • Informatica has a very good commercial data integration suite • It was founded in 1993 • It is the market share leader in data integration (Gartner Dataquest) • It has 2600 customers. Of those, there are fortune 100 companies, companies listed on the Dow Jones and government organization • The company's sole focus is data integration • It has quite a big package for enterprises to integrate their systems, cleanse their data and can connect to a vast number of current and legacy systems Page 13 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 14. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Pentaho Kettle • Talend • Informatica PowerCenter • Inaplex Inaport • Comparison • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 14 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 15. ETL Tools Inaplex Inaport • Inaplex is a small UK company • InaPlex is a producer of Customer Data Integration products for mid-market CRM solutions • Inaplex mainly focuses on providing simple solutions for it’s customers to integrate their data into CRM and accounting software like Sage and Goldmine Page 15 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 16. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 16 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 17. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 17 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 18. Comparison ETL Tool Comparison Chart Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Talend Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Cost Risk Ease of Use Support Deployment Speed Data Quality Monitoring Connectivity Page 18 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 19. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 19 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 20. Comparison Total Cost of Ownership Total Cost of Ownership means the over all cost for a certain product. This can mean initial ordering, licensing servicing, support, training, consulting, and any other additional payments that need to be made before the product is in full use. Commercial Open Source products are typically free to use, but the support, training and consulting are what companies need to pay for. Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Talend Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Page 20 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 21. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 21 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 22. Comparison Risk There are always risks with projects, especially big projects. The risks for projects failing are: • Going over budget • Going over schedule • Not completing the requirements or expectations of the customers Open Source products have much lower risk then Commercial ones since they do not restrict the use of their products by pricey licenses. Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Talend Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Page 22 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 23. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 23 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 24. Comparison Ease of Use All of the ETL tools, apart from Inaport, have GUI to simplify the development process. Having a good GUI also reduces the time to train and use the tools. Talend – Does have a GUI but is an add-on inside Eclipse RC. Pentaho Kettle – Has the most easy to use GUI out of all the tools. Training can also be found online or within the community. Informatica PowerCenter – Has an easy to use GUI, but requires some training to make full use of it. Inaplex Inaport – Does not have a “drag and drop” GUI. Talend Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Page 24 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 25. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 25 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 26. Comparison Support Nowadays, all software products have support and all of the ETL tool providers offer support. Talend – Offers support, but mainly resides in the US. Pentaho Kettle – Offers support from US, UK and has a partner consultant in Hong Kong. Informatica PowerCenter – Offers world-wide support. Inaplex Inaport – Offers support, but mainly resides in the UK. Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Talend Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Page 26 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 27. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 27 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 28. Comparison Deployment Talend – Creates a java file or perl file that can be run with an external scheduler on any machine with very little resource. Recommended one 1Ghz CPU and 512mbs ram Pentaho Kettle – Is a stand-alone java engine that can run on any machine that can run java. Needs an external scheduler to run automatically. It can be deployed on many different machines and used as “slave servers” to help with transformation processing. Recommended one 1Ghz CPU and 512mbs ram Informatica PowerCenter – Requires a server with platforms: Windows, Solaris, HP-UX, IBM-UX, Redhat, SUSE linux. Recommended to use two CPUs with 1Gb ram for Standard Edition Server Inaplex Inaport – Can run on any windows platform that has .NET 2.0 installed Recommended one CPU with 50mbs ram. Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Talend Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Page 28 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 29. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 29 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 30. Comparison Speed The speed of ETL tools depends largely on the data that needs to be transferred over the network and the processing power involved in transforming the data. Talend – Is slower then Pentaho. It requires manual tweaking and prior knowledge of the specific data source to reduce network traffic and processing. Pentaho Kettle – Is faster then Talend, but the Java-connector slows it down somewhat. Also requires manual tweaking like Talend. Can be clustered by placed on many machines to reduce network traffic. Informatica PowerCenter – Is the fastest tool. It has an advanced “PushDown” option that localizes transformation tasks depending on how busy the machine is. Inaplex Inaport – does not use any special techniques to improve speed. Talend Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Page 30 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 31. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 31 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 32. Comparison Data Quality Data Quality is fast becoming the most important feature in any data integration tool. Talend – has DQ features in its GUI, allows for customized SQL statements and by using Java. Pentaho – has DQ features in its GUI, allows for customized SQL statements, by using JavaScript and Regular Expressions. It also has some additional modules after subscribing. Informatica PowerCenter – does not have that many DQ features, but there is another product called Informatica Data Quality which has many DQ features. Inaplex Inaport – does have DQ features. Because of the very specific data that Inaport can integrate, it is relatively easy to clean that data. Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Talend Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Page 32 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 33. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 33 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 34. Comparison Monitoring Monitoring allows to find problems and debug them during and after the development stage. Talend – has practical monitoring tools and logging. Pentaho Kettle – has practical monitoring tools and logging. Informatica PowerCenter – has extensive monitoring tools and logging. Inaplex Inaport - has practical monitoring tools and logging. Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Talend Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Page 34 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 35. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • ETL Tools Comparison Chart • Total Cost of Ownership • Risk • Ease of Use • Support • Deployment • Speed • Data Quality • Monitoring • Connectivity • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 35 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 36. Comparison Connectivity In most cases, ETL tools transfer data from legacy systems. Their connectivity is very important to the usefulness of the ETL tools. Talend – Can connect to all the current databases, flat files, xml files, excel files and web services, but is reliant on Java drivers to connect to those data sources. Pentaho Kettle – Can connect to a very wide variety of databases, flat files, xml files, excel files and web services. Informatica PowerCenter – Can connect to a huge number of databases, mainframes, flat files, excel files and web services. It can also export as a web service. Inaplex Inaport – Can connect to any ODBC (windows) connection. It usually gets its data from current databases, outlook, ACT and excel files. Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Talend Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Page 36 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 37. Comparison ETL Tool Comparison Chart Pentaho Informatica Inaplex Talend Kettle PowerCenter Inaport Cost Risk Ease of Use Support Deployment Speed Data Quality Monitoring Connectivity Page 37 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 38. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • Use Cases • MySQL • Loma Linda University Health Care • BNSF Logistics • U.S. Naval Air Systems Command • Conclusion Page 38 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 39. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • Use Cases • MySQL • Loma Linda University Health Care • BNSF Logistics • U.S. Naval Air Systems Command • Conclusion Page 39 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 40. Use Cases MySQL "We selected Pentaho for its ease-of-use. Pentaho addressed many of our requirements -- from reporting and analysis to dashboards, OLAP and ETL, and offered our business users the Excel-based access that they wanted." Key Challenges • Reporting and analysis of operational expenses by department and cost center • Multiple data sources including Microsoft Excel (for cost-center rollups) Results • Centralized view of spending by department • Easy access to information from Excel Why Pentaho • Ease of use • Breadth of solution • Cost of ownership Page 40 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 41. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • Use Cases • MySQL • Loma Linda University Health Care • BNSF Logistics • U.S. Naval Air Systems Command • Conclusion Page 41 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 42. Use Cases Loma Linda University Health Care "Pentaho Customer Support has been exceptional. This is a strategic application at LLUHC, and working with Pentaho has accelerated our deployment and improved our overall application delivery." Key Challenges • Providing analytics for billing and operations supporting 500,000 patients and 600 doctors Results • Comprehensive analysis of time periods, services provided, billing groups, physicians • Centralized, secured, consistent information delivery (versus prior Excel- based system) • Ability to drill and analyze down to the individual patient level Why Pentaho • Open standards support and ease of integration • Cost of ownership Page 42 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 43. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • Use Cases • MySQL • Loma Linda University Health Care • BNSF Logistics • U.S. Naval Air Systems Command • Conclusion Page 43 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 44. Use Cases BNSF Logistics "Using Pentaho for our business intelligence platform, along with the expert support and knowledge provided by OpenBI, BNSF Logistics was able to implement our initial data warehouse with web-based reporting and analytics in just six weeks. Not only did we deliver a powerful business intelligence tool set for our organization in short order, but were able to do so at a fraction of the cost of proprietary alternatives." Key Challenges • Cumbersome, manual process for creation and distribution of reports • Inconsistent data accuracy because of semi-automated preparation processes Results • Initial data warehouse with web-based reporting and analytics in 6 weeks • 75% lower acquisition costs, 50% lower ongoing ownership costs compared to proprietary BI • Ability to monitor operational business health Why Pentaho • Faster, better decisions in sales processes Open standards support and ease of integration Page 44 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison Cost of ownership
- 45. Table of Contents • Introduction • ETL tools • Comparison • Use Cases • MySQL • Loma Linda University Health Care • BNSF Logistics • U.S. Naval Air Systems Command • Conclusion Page 45 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 46. Use Cases U.S. Naval Air Systems Command "[Open technologies] reduce the cost of software development and they reduce the time in which innovations in software can be incorporated in systems. 'If the project is of a sufficient scale, you cannot get there without an open-source approach,' said Dewey Houck, a senior engineer at Boeing, who spoke at a conference last month about DOD's use of open source." (Government Computer News, Jan. 2008)" Key Challenges • Analyzing flight data to reduce operational risk and improve training (human error is a causal factor in 70% of aviation mishaps) Results • Ability to leverage recorded electronic sensor data to reduce risk and improve crew performance Why Pentaho • Breadth of capabilities • Proven success and large-scale referenceable deployments • Successful proof-of-concept • Dramatically lower costs Page 46 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 47. Table of Contents • Introduction • What do ETL tools do? • Why use an ETL tools? • ETL tools • Comparison • Use Cases • Conclusion Page 47 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison
- 48. Conclusion • Informatica and Pentaho have very good products. • Informatica has a far more extensive range of products, but compared to Pentaho is very expensive. • Pentaho has proved that it can handle small to large scale systems. • Pentaho is gaining fast momentum with businesses that would not have considered using open source products before. Page 48 | 20 March 2008 | ETL Tools Comparison