Introduction to Philosophy 101 HomeworkSection 3 Deductive Argum.pdf
- 1. Introduction to Philosophy 101: Homework Section 3: Deductive Arguments and Standard Form/Short Answer Directions: Put the following deductive arguments into standard form and determine whether the arguments are of the form modus ponens, modus tollens, disjunctive syllogism, or hypothetical syllogism. 1. If it is true that everyone lies to serve their own interest, then no one can be trusted. But, obviously I know many people who can be trusted. Therefore, it cannot be true that everyone lies to serve their own interest. 1. 2. ___________________________________________________ 3. Form: 2. If large cattle farms are more harmful to the environment than driving automobiles, then eating beef is morally wrong. Large cattle farms are more harmful than driving automobiles. Thus, this must mean that eating beef is morally wrong. 1. 2. _____________________________________________________ 3. Form: 3. If determinism is true then no human being can ever be responsible for any of their actions. If human beings cannot be responsible for their actions, then there is no such thing as universal ethics. Therefore, if determinism is true, then there is no such thing as universal ethics. 1. 2. ________________________________________________________ 3. Form: 4. Explain Sophistic rhetoric. What is its purpose? 5. Why does Socrates claim that he is the wisest in all of Athens? 6. Explain Socrates’ idea of truth. Does truth exist? 7. Explain Dqescartes’ method of doubt and the rational truth he discovers. 8. According to Berkeley, “if a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound?” Explain this in
- 2. terms of his philosophy. 9. When referring to the theory of Dualism, what is the problem of interaction? 10. Briefly define Physicalism. Solution 2. If large cattle farms are more harmful to the environment than driving automobiles, then eating beef is morally wrong. Large cattle farms are more harmful than driving automobiles. Thus, this must mean that eating beef is morally wrong. Form: modus ponens P: Large cattle farms are more harmful than driving automobiles Q: that eating beef is morally wrong. If P Q and P are true, then Q is true, by modus ponens. 3. If determinism is true then no human being can ever be responsible for any of their actions. If human beings cannot be responsible for their actions, then there is no such thing as universal ethics. Therefore, if determinism is true, then there is no such thing as universal ethics. Form:disjunctive syllogism. 1. If it is true that everyone lies to serve their own interest, then no one can be trusted. But, obviously I know many people who can be trusted. Therefore, it cannot be true that everyone lies to serve their own interest. Form: modus tollens 4. Explain Sophistic rhetoric. What is its purpose? The Sophists were orators, public speakers, mouths for hire in an oral culture. They were gifted with speech. They were skilled in what becomes known as Rhetoric. They were respected, feared and hated. They had a gift and used it in a manner that aroused the ire of many. They challenged, questioned and did not care to arrive at the very best answers. They cared about winning public speaking contests, debates, and lawsuits and in charging fees to teach others how to do as they did. To be able to speak well meant a great deal at that time. As there was no real paper available, there were no written contracts or deeds and disputes that would be settled today with a set of documents as evidence back then they would need to be settled through a contest of words: one person's words against another's. Whoever presented the best oral case would often prevail. To speak well was very important. The Sophists were very good speakers. Indeed, they had reputations for being able to convince a crowd that up was down, that day was night, that the wrong answer could be the right answer, that good was bad and bad is good, even that injustice is justice and justice would be made to appear as injustice! To support one's position in any matter, nothing better could be offered than a quotation from
- 3. one of the works, which told of the gods and their actions. If an action of the gods could be found that was similar top that being taken by a party to a debate then that was evidence of the correctness of that action. Therefore, those who were the fastest and most accurate at being able to locate quotations and take them and apply them to a given situation would often win the debate, the contest, the lawsuit or discussion. The Sophists were very well versed in the epic tales and poems. They were able to find the most appropriate quotation to support any position. They regularly entered contests and those who won were given prizes, but no prize was greater than being the victor and able to charge the highest rates of tuition to instruct the sons of the wealthy in how to speak in public. This skill was needed to defend oneself against lawsuits even against the most frivolous of lawsuits brought by one who thought himself to be the better speaker. The Sophists taught courses that might have been labeled with such current phrasings as: · How to win no matter how bad your case is. · How to win friends and influence people · How to succeed in business without really trying · How to fall into a pigsty and come out smelling like a rose. · How to succeed in life. · How to play to win