IRJET- Finite Element Investigation on Buckling Behaviour of Corrugated Web Beams-Ansys Workbench

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 05 | May 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 6599
Finite Element Investigation on Buckling Behaviour of Corrugated Web
Beams-Ansys Workbench
Sruthi v v1, Athira B Krishnan2Sruthi Das3
1PG student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, SNGCET Payyanur, Kerala, India
2Assistant professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, SNGCET Payyanur, Kerala, India
3Assistant professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, SNGCET Payyanur, Kerala, India
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Beams with corrugated webs (CWB) have been
extensively used in structural applications such as buildings
and bridges. It usually compriseofwidethickplateflangesand
a thin corrugated web. Under shear action three different
modes of shear buckling can be realized in the web they are
local, global or interactive. Webs of either trapezoidal,
rectangular, triangular or sinusoidal shape are often used. In
general, corrugated web beams can be more economical than
conventional plate web. A study was conducted to investigate
the strength behaviour of trapezoidal curved corrugated
beams with different radius of curvature, web thickness&
flange thickness. The objective was to compare the buckling
strength of plate girders without corrugation and
trapezoidally curved corrugated girders. Themainadvantage
of corrugated web beams is the increased buckling resistance
without the need to weld stiffeners to the web. This resultsin a
decrease in the beam weight without compromise in strength,
with reduction in costs of up to 30% being possible. In bridge
construction the requirement for intermediate diaphragms
which are used for transverse load transfer can be reduced by
using corrugated webs. As a result hybrid bridges of different
cross-sections can be constructed.
Key Words: CWB, corrugated web, local, global,
interactive
1. INTRODUCTION
The structural purpose of steel in construction industry are
becoming more popular and having higher importance due
to their better durability, strength, uniform shapes and
simplicity in construction. In steel structure, main issues
raised are how to reduce the weight and cost of the
component parts such as girder and beams. The inspection
of web is usually considered for such requirements by
comparing the thickness and the shape. Web in the beam
carries most of the compressive stress and transmits shear.
Major external loads are supported by flanges. It can
decrease the cost and materials without reducing the load-
carrying capacity of the beam. For the design of girders and
beams thin web is efficient and economical. However, the
sections have to be slender to carry the moments, and these
slender section will cause the web buckling. Hence to avoid
this buckling, corrugations to the web are used. The main
purpose of using corrugated web is that no stiffening is
needed because it permits the use of thinner plates. Hence it
considerably reduces the cost of beam fabrication with
improved weight saving. The corrugated profile in the web
provides a kind of uniformly distributed stiffening in the
transverse direction of a girder, whichincreasestheultimate
strength and out-of-plane stiffness. This can be explained in
detail. The I section beams are commonly used in structural
steel works. Ordinary shapes of these beams are produced
from two parallel flanges and a web where about 30–40% of
the entire weight of a medium flange width or narrowflange
type of beam is contributed by the web .In construction
application, the web usually bears most of the compressive
stress and transmits shear in the beam while the flanges
support the major external loads.Thus,byusingthinnerweb
and greater part of the material for the flanges, materials
saving could be achieved without weakening the load
carrying capacity of the beam.
1.1 Corrugated web Beam
A corrugated web beam is a built-up beam consists of thin
walled corrugated web. The profiling of the web avoids the
failure of the beam due to loss of stability before the plastic
limit loading of the web is arrived. The use of corrugated
webs is a method to achieve adequate out-of plane stiffness
and shear bulking resistance without using stiffeners.
Corrugated web beams are fabricated by using two steel
plates which acts as flanges and a corrugated steel sheet as
web are welded to form a beam. An idea of using corrugated
metal sheet for webs of plate girders emerged as early as in
the 1930s. It was observed that sheet folds perpendicular to
flanges produced web stiffening, which significantly
increased critical stress, thus allowing the use of slender
walls. Starting from the 1960s, the fabrication of plate
girders with web folds located parallel to beam axes was
considered. Such an orientation of the web folds, however,
made it necessary to for transverse stiffeners to be welded
into each site a concentrated load occurred. This
disadvantage was not found in plate girders with webs, the
folds of which were perpendicular to the flanges. As
appropriate welding technologies were not available then,
girders of that type did not become widely used. Fabrication
automation in the late 1980s early 1990s made large-scale
use of such girders possible. Currently, corrugated web I-
girders are most commonly employed in the load carrying

structures of single- or two-bay buildings. Figure 1 shows
corrugated web beam used in single storey. The girders
available on the market have webs that are 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0
mm in thickness and vary from 333 to 1500 mm in height.
The mill-guaranteedyieldstrengthofcorrugated websteel is
fy = 215N/mm2.
Fig – 1 Corrugated Web Beam
1.2 Corrugation Profiles
The web of the girders can be corrugated usingdifferent
profiles like rectangular corrugated web, trapezoidally
corrugated web, sinusoidal corrugated web, etc. The
aesthetics of the different configurations is completely
different, but also the fabrication, the mechanical behaviour
and the price of the different types have to be taken in
account when making a choice for one of them. The thinner
trapezoidally corrugated web beam section provides a
higher resistance against bending and higher load carrying
capacity besides more cost economical whencompared with
other types. Among these types trapezoidal corrugated
profile has the maximum load carrying capacity
1.3 Objective of the Work
To conduct nonlinear static analysis of trapezoidally
curved corrugated web beams with different parameters
using ANSYS WORK BENCH 16.1 To compare the buckling
strength of plate girders without corrugation and
trapezoidally curved corrugated girders To compare
buckling strength, stiffness and weight of corrugated web
beams in straight and curved profilesandstraightbeamwith
flat web.
2 .VALIDATION
Based on the experimental investigation done by B Kovesdi,
L. Dunai[12]“Determination of the patch loading resistance
of girders with corrugated webs using nonlinear finite
element analysis” validation is performed. The aim of
previous study is to determine the patch loading resistance
by different geometrical arrangements, loading lengths and
loading positions by experimental and FEA.
Table -1: Properties of beam for validation
hw 500 mm
tw 6 mm
bf 225 mm
tf 20 mm
Fyw 379N/mm2
fyb 373N/mm2
Young’s modulus(E) 2x105N/mm2
Poisson’s ratio 0.3
Length of the beam 1500 mm
Loading length 90 mm
Chart -1: Load Deflection Curve of Validated Beam
Table -2: Comparison of validation result
Patch loading Resistance
(KN)
Previous Experimental
Study
754.2
Validated result from
ANSYS WORKBENCH 16.1
702
% Variation = 6.89
The result which is obtained from ANSYSWORKBENCH16.1
is approximately same as the results which is obtained from
experimental investigation in previous study. Thus the
ANSYS model is validated.
3. MODELLING OF TRAPEZOIDAL CORRUGATED
CURVED BEAMS
The material propertiesofbeamandgeometryoftrapezoidal
section is same as that in the validated corrugated web
beam. But the span is taken as 4.5m.
i. Variation in radius of curvature
ii. Variation in web thickness
iii. Variation in flange thickness

iv. Straight beam with corrugation
v. Straight beam without corrugation
3.1 Variation in Radius of Curvature
According to the material properties,trapezoidal curved
corrugated web beams are modelled. Radius of curvature is
chosen like 8000mm, 10000mm& 12000mm respectively.
Geometry of the beam model and total deformationisshown
in figure 2&figure 3respectively.
Fig -2: Geometry of TCC8
Fig-3: Total Deformation Sof TCC8
Chart-2: Combined Load Deflection curve
From the above chart 2 it can be understand that TCC10 has
the maximum load carrying capacity and maximumstiffness
compared with others.so this radiusofcurvatureisprovided
for modelling of all other beams.
3.2 Variation in web thickness
According to the material properties,trapezoidal curved
corrugated web beams are modelled. Web thickness is
chosen like 4mm, 6mm, 8mm, 10mm, and 12mm
respectively.
From the above chart 3, it can be understand that, at the
starting point beam with 4mm web thickness has maximum
stiffness. But the beam fails at a smaller load.as the web
thickness increases up to 12mm and it can be notice that
load carrying capacity and stiffness increases. It can be
conclude that as the web thickness increases load carrying
capacity also increases.
3.3 Variation in flange thickness
According to the material properties, trapezoidal curved
corrugated web beams are modelled. Web thickness is
chosen like 4mm, 6mm, 8mm, 10mm, and 12mm
respectively.

From the above chart 4 it can be understand that, beamwith
10mm flange thickness has increased stiffness.Butthebeam
fails at a smaller load.as the flange thickness increases up to
25mm, it can be notice that load carrying capacity and
stiffness increases compared with beam with 15mm &
20mm flange thickness.
3.4 Straight Beam with Corrugation (SBC)
For making comparison with curved corrugated beams,
straight beam with corrugation and straight beam without
corrugation are modelled and analysed. Figure 4 shows the
modelling details
Fig-4: Geometry, Meshed Model, Maximum Deformation
&Buckling Load of SBC
Beam fails at a load of 722.96KN and the corresponding
deformation is 18.03mm.
3.4 Straight Beam Without Corrugation (SBWC)
Figure 5 shows the modelling details of straight beam
without corrugation.
Fig-4: Geometry, Meshed Model, Maximum Deformation &
Buckling Load of SBWC
Here buckling load is obtained as 564.38KN and the
corresponding deformation is 10.37mm. Curved corrugated
web beam having 6mm web thickness and 20mm flange
thickness is used for comparing straight beam with
corrugation and straight beam without corrugation.
Chart-4: Comparison of Load Carrying Capacity
Load carrying capacity of straight beam with flat web,
straight beam with corrugation & curved beam with
corrugation are compared. Corrugated curved beam has the
maximum load carrying capacity compared with the other
two beam. Straight beam without corrugationhasthelowest
load carrying capacity. Introduction of curvature further
enhanced the load carrying capacity.
Table -3: Results
No. Models Buckling
Load
(KN)
Deformation
(Mm)
Weight
(N)
1 TCC8 897.69 25.012 3598.46
2 TCC10 1128.4 18.69 4490.06
3 TCC12 1087.1 19.48 4800.34
4 TCC10-W4 813.82 12.39 4160.8
5 TCC10-W6 1128.4 18.69 4494.64
6 TCC10-W8 1144.2 18.556 4828.4
7 TCC10-W10 1153.4 18.546 5162.41
8 TCC10-W12 1160.5 18.441 5496.2
9 TCC10-F5 244.96 16.39 2147.8
10 TCC10-F10 541.91 12.376 2930.14

11 TCC10-F15 854.84 19.811 3712.39
12 TCC10-F20 1126.9 20.639 3800.34
13 TCC10-F25 1235.1 14.309 5276.89
14 SBC 722.96 18.03 3520.71
15 SBWC 564.38 10.37 2980.41
From table 3, Curved corrugated beam has the maximum
weight compared with others. But curved corrugated girder
doesn’t require stiffners.so this weight will notbea problem.
More stiffeners are required incaseofstraightbeamwithout
corrugation. The main purpose of using corrugated web is
that it permits the use of thinner plates which require no
stiffening; hence it considerably reduces the cost of beam
fabrication with significant weight saving.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Validation is performed and the models are validated and
6.89%variation is found. Curved trapezoidal corrugated
beam of radius of curvature 8000mm, 10000mm,12000mm
are modelled and analysed.10000mm radius of curvature
have maximum load carrying capacity. Curved trapezoidal
corrugated beam of radius of curvature 10000mm having
4mm, 6mm, 8mm, 10mm &12mm web thickness are
modelled and analysed. Beam with 12mm web thickness
have maximum load carrying capacity compared with other
beams. As the web thickness increases total weight also
increases, so optimum web thicknessistakenfor economical
construction. Curved trapezoidal corrugated beam of radius
of curvature 10000mmhaving5mm,10mm,15mm,20mm&
25mm flange thickness are modelled and analysed. Beam
with 25mm web thickness have maximum load carrying
capacity compared with other beams. For economical
construction optimum flange thickness can be used. Load
carrying capacity of straight beam with flat web, straight
beam with corrugation & curved beam with corrugation are
compared. Load carrying capacity of straight beam
corrugated is 21.93% greater than straight beam with flat
web. Load carrying capacity of curved beam corrugated is
49.91% significantlyhigherthanstraightbeamwithflatweb.
Load carrying capacity of curvedbeamcorrugatedis35.84%
greater than straight beam corrugated. So it can be conclude
that curved corrugated web beams has enhanced load
carrying capacity in comparison with straight beam with
corrugation and straight beam without corrugation.
REFERENCES
[1] Karnik Aggarwal, Sam Wu, John Papangelis “Finite
element analysis of local shear buckling in corrugated
web beams”engineering structures 162 (2018) 37-50
[2] Gaya K Vinod, Manju P M “Buckling Analysis of Plate
Girders with RectangularCorrugatedWeb”IOSRJournal
of Mechanical andCivil Engineering(IOSR-JMCE)e-ISSN:
2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, PP 47-53
[3] Raiza Ashrawi M.A, Sunitha Rani C.M, Smitha K.K “Load
Carrying Capacity Of Corrugated Web Beam” e-ISSN:
2395 -0056 Volume: 03 Issue: 09Sep -2016 p-ISSN:
2395-0072
[4] Witold Basinski “Shear Buckling of Plate Girders with
Corrugated Web Restrained by End Stiffeners” Online
First (2018) paper 11554
[5] R. Divahar, P. S. Joanna “The Effect of Web Corrugation
in Cold-Formed Steel Beam with Trapezoidally
Corrugated Web” American Journal of Engineering
Research (AJER) e-ISSN :2320-0847p-ISSN :2320-0936
Volume-03, Issue-06, pp-137-142
[6] Reshma. C, Ajisha. R “Buckling Analysis of Corrugated
Plate Girders” Volume 4 Issue IX, September 2016 IC
Value: 13.98ISSN: 2321-9653
[7] Prof.Dr:S.A.Tohamy,Ass.Prof.Dr:A.B.Saddek,Eng:Asmaa.Y
.Hamed“Interactive Shear Buckling Of Plate Girder with
Corrugated Web (Analytical Solution) e-ISSN: 2320-
0847 p-ISSN : 2320-0936 Volume-5, Issue-7, pp-40-46
[8] Sedky Abdullah Tohamy, Osama Mohamed Abu El Ela,
Amr Bakr Saddek, Ahmed Ibrahim Mohamed “Efficiency
of plate girder with corrugated web versus plate girder
with flat web” Minia Journal of Engineering and
Technology, (MJET) Vol. 32, No 1, January 2013
[9] Limaye A. A, Alandkar P. M “Strength Of Welded Plate
Girder With Corrugated Web Plate” Int. Journal of
Engineering Research and Applications ISSN : 2248-
9622, Vol. 3, Issue 5, Sep-Oct 2013, pp.1925-1930
[10] Jian-Guo Nie, Li ZhuMu-Xuan ,TaoLiang Tang “Shear
strength of trapezoidal corrugatedsteel webs"journal of
constructional steel research 85 (2013) 105-115
[11] Tong Guo, Richard Sause “Analysis of local elastic shear
buckling of trapezoidal corrugatedsteel webs”journal of
constructional steel research 102(2014) 59-71
[12] B. Kovesdi, L. Dunai “Determination of the patchloading
resistance of girders with corrugated webs using
nonlinear finite element analysis”computers and
structures 89 (2011) 2010-2019
[13] Mr. Sujit P. Naikwadi, Mr. S.B.Kandekar,Dr. R.S Talikoti
“Numerical Analysis of Buckling Strength of Welded
Plate Girder with Corrugated Web Plate Girder” IJSRD -
International Journal for Scientific Research &
Development| Vol. 3, Issue 01, 2015 | ISSN (online):
2321-0613
[14] Sachin K.G, Mrs.Sowjanya G.V “Buckling Strength And
Bending Performance OfPlateGirder WithFlatWebAnd
Corrugated Web” International Journal Of Civil And
Structural Engineering Research ISSN 2348-7607
(Online) Vol. 2, Issue 2, Pp: (1-11), Month: October2014
- March 2015

[15] Jiho Moon, Jong-Won Yi, Byung H, Choi, Hak-Eun Lee,
“Lateral– torsional buckling of I-girder with corrugated
webs under uniform bending Thin-WalledStructures47
(2009) 21–30
[16] Prof. Nimbalkar Amol N.,Prof.NutiKirankumarM“Finite
Element Analysis Of Trapezoidal Corrugated WebBeam
To Determine Strength” Issn (Print):2393-8374,
(Online): 2394-0697, Volume-5, Issue-2, 2018
[17] Dan Dubina, Viorel Ungureanu, Lucian Gilia
“Experimental investigationsofcold-formedsteel beams
of corrugated web and built-up section for flanges “thin
walled structures 90 (2015) 159-170
[18] QiCao,HaiboJiang,HaohanWang “Shear Behavior of
Corrugated Steel Webs in H Shape Bridge Girders”
Volume 2015, Article ID 796786
[19] Amr B. Saddek “Theoretical Investigation of Shear
Buckling for Hybrid Steel Plate Girder with Corrugated
Webs” World Applied Sciences Journal 33 (2): 284-302,
2015 ISSN 1818-4952 IDOSI Publications, 2015
[20] Zhiquan Wen, Wenlong Wei “Nonlinear Shear Buckling
Parametric Finite-Element Analysis of Corrugated Steel
Webs” Modern Applied Science; Vol. 8, No. 4; 2014 ISSN
1913-1844 E-ISSN 1913-1852
[21] Hartmut Pasternak, Gabriel Kubieniec “Plate Girders
with Corrugated Webs” Journal of Civil Engineering and
Management 2010 16(2): 166–171

IRJET- Finite Element Investigation on Buckling Behaviour of Corrugated Web Beams-Ansys Workbench

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to IRJET- Finite Element Investigation on Buckling Behaviour of Corrugated Web Beams-Ansys Workbench (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

IRJET- Finite Element Investigation on Buckling Behaviour of Corrugated Web Beams-Ansys Workbench