SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Please Text Your Responses/Insight
Send To: 37607
Message: Type in 697378 (add your message…)

#edtonomy
January 6, 2014
Educator Autonomy
Work Session

Focus:
Curriculum and Instruction:
Identifying Barriers
(perceived and/or real)
to Autonomy

#edtonomy

The purpose of the Educator Autonomy Project is to support Rhode
Island’s efforts to create a world-class education system by working with
all stakeholders to design recommendations to the Governor to improve
student achievement through increased local autonomy.
#edtonomy

2
Educator Autonomy Project
Reminder:

Guiding Principles

• Student learning and success is paramount.
• Educators (teachers, school and district
administrators) want what is best for students.
• Decisions should be made as close to the
student as is practical and effective.

3
Educator Autonomy Project
Reminder: Key Questions

Key questions:
– What barriers to effective/innovative teaching and
learning exist in Rhode Island?
– How could these barriers be removed or mitigated?
– What improvements in governance, school
leadership structure and decision-making would
allow for more innovative teaching and learning?
– How can we strengthen autonomy and ensure
consistent quality and effectiveness?
4
Educator Autonomy Project: Phases of Work
Our work begins with gaining an understanding of autonomy as it relates to curriculum and instructions.
Phase 1:
Planning Phase
Sept. – Nov.

Build Common
Understanding of
Issue (Dec – Feb)

Phase 2: Determine
Areas of
Recommendations

Phase 3: Test and
Develop Specific
Recommendations

Feb. - May

May - July

Key Questions:
What information do WG
members need to have
productive sessions and develop
a robust set of actionable
recommendations?
What process(es) would ensure
full and open discussion leading
to consensus?

What barriers to
effective/innovative
teaching and learning
exist in RI?
How have others
resolved these
barriers?

What changes in governance
would allow for more
effective/innovative teaching
and learning?
How could barriers to
effective teaching and
learning be removed or
mitigated?

How could proposed
recommendations be
implemented?
How can we strengthen
autonomy and ensure quality
and effectiveness?

Process:
Work with Co-Chairs to provide
appropriate pre-reading materials
and to meet with WG members
to ensure questions are
answered and expectations are
clear

Conduct surveys of
stakeholders and
review existing
research and bodies
of work

Identify areas of greatest
opportunity

Dig deep to determine best
path for implementation
working closely with
stakeholders

Work with Co-Chairs to design
process(es)

Build consensus
around key questions
and issue

Develop recommendations

Prioritize recommendations
5
Educator Autonomy Project
Budgeting

Curriculum
and
instruction

Staffing and
Professional
Development

Prioritize
recommendations
and design any
associated
measurement/

Additional
areas
determined by
working group

accountability
recommendations

6
Federal
Authority

Federal Laws*

Autonomy in Education
State
Authority

BEP**
CCSS***
NGSS ****

District
Authority
District
Policy and
Practice

School
Authority

School Policy
and Practice

Educator
Authority

* Federal Laws include No Child Left Behind, Elementary and Secondary Education Act
** Basic Education Program
*** Common Core State Standards
****Next Generation Science Standards
7
Educator Autonomy Project

Prioritize
recommendations and
design any associated
measurement/
accountability
recommendations

8
Curriculum and Instruction:
Potential Barriers and Causes
• Engage in multi-step process in smaller groups
• Brainstorm driving and restraining forces for
increased curriculum and instructional
autonomy
• Identify causes of restraining forces

9
Driving
Forces

Sample Force-Field Analysis
Desired State: Place technology in the hands of every student

Restraining
Forces

Students need to be equipped to
engage in 21st century world

Budget

Access to relevant, real-time
data and content

Safety/Security

Move students beyond
technology as a social
media and gaming tool

Need for additional IT support

Lack of teacher/student preparation

10
Fish Bone Diagram
PRACTICES
Restraining force
examined:
Safety and
Security

Student
infractions
inappropriate
use of
technology

No formal
teacher/student
training legal
implications

Existing
policies are
outdated
POLICIES
Instructions:
Identify the “restraining force” your group will examine
Identify causes: ‘Why does this happen?’
Group potential causes and record them on the bones of the diagram

11
Small Group Report Out
• Three (3) highlights from force-field analysis
• One (1) restraining force examined in detail

12
Yanaiza Gallant (Rm 505)

Pat Page (Rm 502)

Jessica Waters (Rm 501)

Carolyn

Alan

Deborah

Julian

Bob

Rick

Karen

Christina

Rob

Patrick (Buzz)

Pierre

Sue

Ron

Val

Tim

13
Educator Autonomy Working Group
Post-Session Work

• Review RIDE website for further
information
– Basic Education Program
– Common Core State Standards
– Next Generation Science Standards

• To prepare for next meeting on
budgeting, please think about:
How do fiscal decisions affect the interactions
educators have with students?
14

More Related Content

PPTX
RI Educator Autonomy Kickoff presentation
PDF
Analysis of Massachusetts Innovation School Model
PDF
Los Angeles Autonomy Framework
PDF
Fulton County GA Autonomy Framework
PPTX
Massachusetts Early College Designation
PDF
Revised Program Approval for Public Institutions and Timeline
PPTX
Massachusetts Early College Initiative Launch
RI Educator Autonomy Kickoff presentation
Analysis of Massachusetts Innovation School Model
Los Angeles Autonomy Framework
Fulton County GA Autonomy Framework
Massachusetts Early College Designation
Revised Program Approval for Public Institutions and Timeline
Massachusetts Early College Initiative Launch

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Commissioner's Year-End Report
PPTX
A School Leader’s Guide to Effective Stakeholder Engagement
PPTX
Education Governance and Teacher Motivation
PPTX
Massachusetts Early College Initiative
PPT
NCASCD - District Improvement 2/09
PPTX
School Effectiveness, Accountability and Improvement
PPTX
Performance Measurement: Ensuring Accuracy, Transparency and Relevance
PDF
Attachment.aspx 2
PDF
Overcoming challenging school environments
PDF
Cohort 2 Schools Orientation to Next Steps NH
PPSX
Turning Around the Nation's Lowest Performing Schools
PPTX
Lily Busher iau policy brief presentation
PPTX
AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative: Building a STEM Reform Network
PPTX
Learning and Reading around the Globe (Shane Armstrong, Scholastic Internatio...
PPTX
Dr Cathy Stone - Presentation on online learning for Regional Study Hubs Conf...
PDF
TN Academic Specialists Case Study
PDF
Attachment.aspx 5
PPTX
NCSEHE - Regional Study Hubs Network Conference One (Geraldton Universities C...
PPTX
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for T...
Commissioner's Year-End Report
A School Leader’s Guide to Effective Stakeholder Engagement
Education Governance and Teacher Motivation
Massachusetts Early College Initiative
NCASCD - District Improvement 2/09
School Effectiveness, Accountability and Improvement
Performance Measurement: Ensuring Accuracy, Transparency and Relevance
Attachment.aspx 2
Overcoming challenging school environments
Cohort 2 Schools Orientation to Next Steps NH
Turning Around the Nation's Lowest Performing Schools
Lily Busher iau policy brief presentation
AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative: Building a STEM Reform Network
Learning and Reading around the Globe (Shane Armstrong, Scholastic Internatio...
Dr Cathy Stone - Presentation on online learning for Regional Study Hubs Conf...
TN Academic Specialists Case Study
Attachment.aspx 5
NCSEHE - Regional Study Hubs Network Conference One (Geraldton Universities C...
Bringing Equity and Quality Learning Together: Institutional Priorities for T...
Ad

Similar to RI Educator Autonomy Workgroup: Jan 6 2014 (20)

PDF
RI Educator Autonomy recommendation revisions from 5/14 meeting
DOCX
January 6, 2014 Educator Autonomy Workgroup Agenda
PDF
Educator Autonomy Agenda March 4, 2014
PDF
Educator autonomy work group may.5.14 agenda final
PDF
RI Educator Autonomy Draft Report v.6
PDF
February 11, 2014 agenda
PDF
Educator autonomy work group agenda 6.2.14
PDF
RI Educator Autonomy: Draft new recommendations for consideration 6.2.14
PDF
Attachment #2 new items for june 2 2014
PDF
RI Educator Autonomy New Draft Recommendations 6.2.14
PDF
Educator Autonomy Project Report August 2014 (1)
DOCX
Educator autonomy work group kick off agenda12 3 13 final (2)
PDF
Educator autonomy working group straw recommendations_5 5 14
DOCX
Educator autonomy work group july7 agenda_final
DOCX
RI Educator Autonomy Agenda April 7, 2014
PPT
Leadership Presentation
PPT
Instructional Barrier Busters
PPTX
DIScovering Abilities, Uncovering New Possibilities!
PDF
RI Educator Autonomy Project: Fact sheet and FAQs
RI Educator Autonomy recommendation revisions from 5/14 meeting
January 6, 2014 Educator Autonomy Workgroup Agenda
Educator Autonomy Agenda March 4, 2014
Educator autonomy work group may.5.14 agenda final
RI Educator Autonomy Draft Report v.6
February 11, 2014 agenda
Educator autonomy work group agenda 6.2.14
RI Educator Autonomy: Draft new recommendations for consideration 6.2.14
Attachment #2 new items for june 2 2014
RI Educator Autonomy New Draft Recommendations 6.2.14
Educator Autonomy Project Report August 2014 (1)
Educator autonomy work group kick off agenda12 3 13 final (2)
Educator autonomy working group straw recommendations_5 5 14
Educator autonomy work group july7 agenda_final
RI Educator Autonomy Agenda April 7, 2014
Leadership Presentation
Instructional Barrier Busters
DIScovering Abilities, Uncovering New Possibilities!
RI Educator Autonomy Project: Fact sheet and FAQs
Ad

More from ppageegd (18)

PDF
Findings from Finland
PPTX
Findings from finland
PPTX
CommonCoreWebinar
PPTX
ASCD presentation
PDF
BPS Autonomy Report
DOCX
Educator autonomy working group final report review
DOC
Educator autonomy advisory 5 5-14
PDF
Educator autonomy recommendationworksheet_5 5 14
PDF
Summary of themes emerging from autonomy meetings
PDF
Educator autonomy working group conditions for autonomy
PDF
External interview summary for may meeting draftv3
DOCX
Educator autonomy work group 4.7.14 feedback (1)
DOC
Educator autonomy work group 4.7.14 notes
DOC
Advisory April 4, 2014
DOCX
RI Educator Autonomy Panel Tracking Sheet
PDF
Educator Autonomy: Common Themes and Barriers
PDF
Fulton Georgia Autonomy Model
PDF
Los Angeles School District
Findings from Finland
Findings from finland
CommonCoreWebinar
ASCD presentation
BPS Autonomy Report
Educator autonomy working group final report review
Educator autonomy advisory 5 5-14
Educator autonomy recommendationworksheet_5 5 14
Summary of themes emerging from autonomy meetings
Educator autonomy working group conditions for autonomy
External interview summary for may meeting draftv3
Educator autonomy work group 4.7.14 feedback (1)
Educator autonomy work group 4.7.14 notes
Advisory April 4, 2014
RI Educator Autonomy Panel Tracking Sheet
Educator Autonomy: Common Themes and Barriers
Fulton Georgia Autonomy Model
Los Angeles School District

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PPTX
Introduction to Building Materials
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
PPTX
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PDF
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
Introduction to Building Materials
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011

RI Educator Autonomy Workgroup: Jan 6 2014

  • 1. Please Text Your Responses/Insight Send To: 37607 Message: Type in 697378 (add your message…) #edtonomy
  • 2. January 6, 2014 Educator Autonomy Work Session Focus: Curriculum and Instruction: Identifying Barriers (perceived and/or real) to Autonomy #edtonomy The purpose of the Educator Autonomy Project is to support Rhode Island’s efforts to create a world-class education system by working with all stakeholders to design recommendations to the Governor to improve student achievement through increased local autonomy. #edtonomy 2
  • 3. Educator Autonomy Project Reminder: Guiding Principles • Student learning and success is paramount. • Educators (teachers, school and district administrators) want what is best for students. • Decisions should be made as close to the student as is practical and effective. 3
  • 4. Educator Autonomy Project Reminder: Key Questions Key questions: – What barriers to effective/innovative teaching and learning exist in Rhode Island? – How could these barriers be removed or mitigated? – What improvements in governance, school leadership structure and decision-making would allow for more innovative teaching and learning? – How can we strengthen autonomy and ensure consistent quality and effectiveness? 4
  • 5. Educator Autonomy Project: Phases of Work Our work begins with gaining an understanding of autonomy as it relates to curriculum and instructions. Phase 1: Planning Phase Sept. – Nov. Build Common Understanding of Issue (Dec – Feb) Phase 2: Determine Areas of Recommendations Phase 3: Test and Develop Specific Recommendations Feb. - May May - July Key Questions: What information do WG members need to have productive sessions and develop a robust set of actionable recommendations? What process(es) would ensure full and open discussion leading to consensus? What barriers to effective/innovative teaching and learning exist in RI? How have others resolved these barriers? What changes in governance would allow for more effective/innovative teaching and learning? How could barriers to effective teaching and learning be removed or mitigated? How could proposed recommendations be implemented? How can we strengthen autonomy and ensure quality and effectiveness? Process: Work with Co-Chairs to provide appropriate pre-reading materials and to meet with WG members to ensure questions are answered and expectations are clear Conduct surveys of stakeholders and review existing research and bodies of work Identify areas of greatest opportunity Dig deep to determine best path for implementation working closely with stakeholders Work with Co-Chairs to design process(es) Build consensus around key questions and issue Develop recommendations Prioritize recommendations 5
  • 6. Educator Autonomy Project Budgeting Curriculum and instruction Staffing and Professional Development Prioritize recommendations and design any associated measurement/ Additional areas determined by working group accountability recommendations 6
  • 7. Federal Authority Federal Laws* Autonomy in Education State Authority BEP** CCSS*** NGSS **** District Authority District Policy and Practice School Authority School Policy and Practice Educator Authority * Federal Laws include No Child Left Behind, Elementary and Secondary Education Act ** Basic Education Program *** Common Core State Standards ****Next Generation Science Standards 7
  • 8. Educator Autonomy Project Prioritize recommendations and design any associated measurement/ accountability recommendations 8
  • 9. Curriculum and Instruction: Potential Barriers and Causes • Engage in multi-step process in smaller groups • Brainstorm driving and restraining forces for increased curriculum and instructional autonomy • Identify causes of restraining forces 9
  • 10. Driving Forces Sample Force-Field Analysis Desired State: Place technology in the hands of every student Restraining Forces Students need to be equipped to engage in 21st century world Budget Access to relevant, real-time data and content Safety/Security Move students beyond technology as a social media and gaming tool Need for additional IT support Lack of teacher/student preparation 10
  • 11. Fish Bone Diagram PRACTICES Restraining force examined: Safety and Security Student infractions inappropriate use of technology No formal teacher/student training legal implications Existing policies are outdated POLICIES Instructions: Identify the “restraining force” your group will examine Identify causes: ‘Why does this happen?’ Group potential causes and record them on the bones of the diagram 11
  • 12. Small Group Report Out • Three (3) highlights from force-field analysis • One (1) restraining force examined in detail 12
  • 13. Yanaiza Gallant (Rm 505) Pat Page (Rm 502) Jessica Waters (Rm 501) Carolyn Alan Deborah Julian Bob Rick Karen Christina Rob Patrick (Buzz) Pierre Sue Ron Val Tim 13
  • 14. Educator Autonomy Working Group Post-Session Work • Review RIDE website for further information – Basic Education Program – Common Core State Standards – Next Generation Science Standards • To prepare for next meeting on budgeting, please think about: How do fiscal decisions affect the interactions educators have with students? 14

Editor's Notes

  • #2: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?><poll url="http://www.polleverywhere.com/free_text_polls/pSlZ8rBJGXctP6Y"> <!-- This snippet was inserted via the PollEv Presenter app --> <!-- The presence of this snippet is used to indicate that a poll will be shown during the slideshow --> <!-- TIP: You can draw a solid, filled rectangle on your slide and the PollEv Presenter will automatically display your poll in that area. --> <!-- The PollEv Presenter app must also be running and logged in for this to work. --> <!-- To remove this, simply delete it from the notes yourself or use the PollEv Presenter to remove it for you. --> <title>What three things would you change about RI schools?</title></poll>
  • #4: As a reminder – our three guiding principals are…
  • #5: Just as a reminder – this project is important right now – RI has made many positive changes that have improved student outcomes, however, there is much work yet to be done to create a world-class education system – we are taking on this work now to…(the bullet point)
  • #6: Right now we are in Phase 1 of our work – building a common understanding of the issue. Today we will be taking the highest priority area based on feedback from you – curriculum and instruction –and piloting a process to gain a better understanding of where decision-making authority currently resides and what barriers exist to allowing for more autonomy at a classroom level. We will then use that information as a basis for forming some preliminary recommendations focused on curriculum and instruction.
  • #7: Today, our focus will be on Curriculum and Instruction…Given you a broad overview of Federal State and Local frameworksNow we’re going to start with our group phase
  • #8: Autonomy or decision-making authority starts with the Federal government. Federal laws such as NCLB and ESEA (give short summary of what they require) define the authority that is given to each state. Each state has laws or policy that define what decision-making authority rests with the state and what decision-making authority rests within each district. In RI, that policy is the Basic Education Plan which we will go over in just a minute. But to further understand how decision-making authority is determined, each district takes the requirements of the Basic Education Plan and determines what authority the district retains and what authority is delegated to the schools and in turn, each school determines…..BEPOutlines which decisions are made at a state-level and which decisions have been delegated to the districts. General theme is that the “what” is defined by the Basic Education Plan and the “how” is delegated to the districtCCSS?NGSS?
  • #9: Before we can begin to design recommendations with each of the identified target areas, we need to identify what’s holding us back from achieving our objective of autonomy….as it relates to Curriculum and InstructionIf this process helps us achieve our objective, we will use a similar process going forward and ultimately design recommendations for each relevant area, combine and prioritize the recommendations and ensure to add any additional recommendations to ensure adequate accountability.
  • #11: Conduct a quick walk through of the model we will be using, with which some of you may be familiarUsing a Force Field analysis assess the efficacy of placing technology in the hands of every studentRestraining forces: Status QuoDriving Forces: Promote ChangeDoesn’t necessary need to be one-for-one offsetInstructions:Brainstorm driving and restraining forces for curriculum and instruction autonomy in the classroomKeep in mind our guiding questions:What barriers to effective/innovative teaching and learning exist in Rhode Island?What are the causes of these barriers…………………………………………………………Future workshop:How could these barriers be removed or mitigated? What improvements in governance, school leadership structure and decision-making would allow for more innovative teaching and learning?How can we strengthen autonomy and ensure consistent quality and effectiveness?
  • #12: Analyze one of the restraining forcesWhat are the causes that give rise to this potential barrier?Typically causes fall under the categories of People, Equipment,Policies, Procedures/Practices. Most cases people and equipment can be wrapped into Our focus for today’s process will be limited to practices and policiesFuture session:Brainstorm changes that would remove or mitigate these causes
  • #15: Budgeting isnext topic