Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
Download as PPT, PDF21 likes18,268 views
This document discusses job evaluation, which is a systematic process for determining the value or worth of jobs within an organization. It describes the main steps in job evaluation, which include deciding which jobs to evaluate, analyzing each job and preparing descriptions, rating jobs based on selected evaluation factors, and comparing jobs to determine appropriate compensation. The key factors used in evaluating jobs are knowledge, problem-solving abilities, and accountability. Several common methods for conducting job evaluations are also outlined, including ranking, classification, point, and factor comparison methods, along with their advantages and disadvantages.
Job evaluation its methods and advantages & dis-advatages
- 2. Job Evaluation Job evaluaton is a systematic way of determining the value/worth of a job in an organisation.
- 3. Process of Job evaluation Decide which jobs are to be evaluated Job Analysis and preparing job description. systematically rate each job based on the job evaluation factors selected. The points assigned for each of the factors are totalled for each job. A Job is evaluated in the following three categories
- 4. 1. Know-how Know-how is the sum total of every kind of knowledge and skill however acquired, e.g. experience, education, etc. needed for accept-able job performance. Know-how includes three elements: A. Specialized, technical or practical know-how: the basic job knowledge needed. B. Managerial know-how: The degree with which the job deals with planning and organizing the employee’s activities and coordinating with others. C. Human relations skills: The persuasion and communication skills for motivating, training, and developing others.
- 5. 2. Problem Solving Problem solving is the amount of original self-starting thinking required by the job for analyzing, evaluating, creating, reasoning, arriving at and coming to conclusions. Problem-solving has two elements: A. Thinking environment – defines the degree to which the incumbent is free to develop answers to problems, ranging from the day-to-day decisions based on simple memory to those which require creative thinking or long-range strategies. B. Thinking challenge – defines the complexity and uniqueness of problems and may range from
- 6. Accountability is the answerability for action and for the consequences of that action. Accountability has three elements: a) Freedom to act is the degree to which the position can take action without consulting a higher authority. b) Impact on end results- advisory or decision c) Magnitude is the size of the area in which the job functions, i.e, whole organization, single department, etc.
- 7. Compare and see how much value does this job have in the industry . Decide the amount of compensation to be given
- 8. Process of Job evaluation Selecting the method of evaluation. Classifying jobs. Installing the programme. Reviewing periodically.
- 9. Features of Job Evaluation It tries to assess jobs, not people. The standards of job evaluation are relative, not absolute. The basic information on which job evaluations are made is obtained from job analysis.
- 10. Features of Job Evaluation Job evaluations are carried out by groups, not by individuals. Some degree of subjectivity is always present in job evaluation. Job evaluation does not fix pay scales, but merely provides a basis for evaluating a rational wage structure.
- 11. Benefits of job evaluation It tries to link pay with the requirements of the job. It offers a systematic procedure for determining the relative worth of jobs. An equitable wage structure is a natural outcome of job evaluation An unbiased job evaluation tends to eliminate salary inequalities by placing jobs having similar requirements in the same salary range.
- 12. Benefits of job evaluation Employees as well as unions participate as members of job evaluation committee. Job evaluation, when conducted properly and with care, helps in the evaluation of new jobs. It points out possibilities of more appropriate use of the plant’s labour force by indicating jobs that need more or less skilled workers than those who are manning these jobs currently.
- 13. 1- RANKING METHOD 2-CLASSIFICATION METHOD 3-POINT METHOD 4-FACTOR COMPARISON METHOD
- 14. RANKING METHOD It is the simplest method of job evaluation. In this method, jobs are arranged from highest to lowest, in order of their value or merit to the organisation. Jobs can also be arranged according to the relative difficulty in performing them. Jobs are usually ranked in each department and then the department rankings are combined to develop an organisational ranking.
- 15. JOB CLASSIFICATION According to this method, a predetermined number of job groups or job classes are established and jobs are assigned to these classifications. This method places groups of jobs into job classes or job grades. Separate classes may include office, clerical, managerial, personnel, etc.
- 16. JOB CLASSIFICATION Following is a brief description of classification in an office: Class 1- Executives: Office manager, deputy office manager, department supervisor, etc. Class 2- Skilled workers: Purchasing assistant, cashier, receipts clerk, etc. Class 3- Semiskilled workers: Stenotypists, machine operators, switchboard operator, etc. Class 4- Semiskilled workers: file clerks, office boys, etc.
- 17. POINT METHOD This method is widely used currently. In this method jobs are expressed in terms of key factors. Points are assigned to each factor after priortising each factor in order of importance. The points are summed up to determine the wage rate for the job. Jobs with similar point totals are placed in similar pay grades
- 18. Factor Comparison Method It is more systematic and scientific method of job evaluation. Though it is the most complex method of all, it is consistent and appreciable. Under this method, instead of ranking complete jobs, each job is ranked according to a series of factors.
- 19. These factors include: >mental effort. >physical effort. >skills needed. >responsibility. >working conditions. >know-how. >problem solving abilities. >accountibility, etc. Wages are assigned to the job in comparison to its ranking on each job factor.
- 20. Comparison of Job Evaluation Methods Advantage Disadvantage RankingRanking Fast, simple, easy toFast, simple, easy to explain, suitable forexplain, suitable for small org, not expensive.small org, not expensive. Not very accurate , notNot very accurate , not useful for large org.,leastuseful for large org.,least used methodused method ClassificationClassification Can group a wide rangeCan group a wide range of work together in oneof work together in one system, simple, moresystem, simple, more accurate than rakingaccurate than raking method.method. Not useful for large org,Not useful for large org, time consuming, nottime consuming, not involved detailed jobinvolved detailed job analysis.analysis. PointPoint Compensable factors callCompensable factors call out basis forout basis for comparisons.comparisons. Compensable factorsCompensable factors communicate what iscommunicate what is valued.valued. Can becomeCan become bureaucratic and rule-bureaucratic and rule- bound.bound.
- 21. Comparison of Job Evaluation Methods Advantage Disadvantage Factor comparisonFactor comparison methodmethod Finds wages for a job,Finds wages for a job, wages can be calculatedwages can be calculated speedily, greaterspeedily, greater consistency in theconsistency in the judgment, size of jobsjudgment, size of jobs can be measured.can be measured. Expensive, timeExpensive, time consuming,consuming,
Editor's Notes
- #2: MAGNETIC CONTACTORS