Kresge Summer Research
Internship – Final Presentation
Keerthana Velappan
Mentor: Dr. David Kohrman
August 6th, 2015
Introduction to Grxcr1 and Grxcr2
• Cochlear-specific genes required for
stereocilia development and maintenance
• Grxcr1 spontaneous mutant: pirouette (pi)
• Grxcr2 targeted mutant
Grxcr1/Grxcr2 Domain Structure
Preliminary Correction
• Actions of Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 affect
development and maintenance of stereocilia,
likely through effects on actin filament
architecture (structure and rigidity)
How does Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 work?
Putative PP1 Binding Sites
Grxcr1 interacts with/inhibits PP1 phosphatase
Hendricks, A., et al. (2009). Chemistry and
Biology, 16:365-371.
RKVRF
Hypothesis/Experimental Test
• Hypothesis
– Grxcr1 (and/or Grxcr2) exerts effects on
stereocilia by control of phosphorylation via
interaction with/inhibition of PP1
• Experimental Test
– Delete 5 a.a. (15bp) predicted PP1 interaction site
from Grxcr1 and Grxcr2
• Express wild type and mutant proteins from peGFP-N1
hybrid plasmid vector
Experimental Test
Grxcr1 GFP
GFPGrxcr2
Predictions for Hypothesis
• If hypothesis is correct…
– Cells expressing mutant proteins (relative to wild
type) expected to exhibit alterations in PP1
localization and/or phosphorylation activity
– Mutant proteins expected to lack ability to
‘correct’ stereocilia defects in explant cultures
(wild type expected to correct those defects)
Initial Work
• Generation of Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 mutant
plasmids (without 5 a.a./15bp PP1 site)
• Methods for Grxcr2
– Site-directed mutagenesis
– Bacterial transformation
• Methods for Grxcr1
– Overlap PCR
Grxcr2: Site-Directed Mutagenesis
Site-Directed Mutagenesis (cont’d)
• Add WT plasmid/mutant oligos
– Complementary genes (oligos)
• Denature both components
• DNA polymerase extends oligos during
temperature cycling, incorporates mutation
– Stem-loop structure (15 nucleotide deletion)
– High-fidelity low error rate polymerase (Pfu)
– Extend 3’ end of oligos
– Product treated with DpnI/nicked DNA is transformed
• WT template is methylated=> DpnI-sensitive fragments
(cuts/circle)
• Mutated molecule unmethylated=> DpnI-resistant
Grxcr2: Results
• Confirmed overall structure of mutant
plasmid: BamH1-EcoRI restriction enzyme
digest
Grxcr2: Results (cont’d)
• Confirmed deletion is only in one place =>
sequencing (used SeqMan to align sequences)
Grxcr1: Overlap PCR
056 170
171 172
227bp
923bp
1.1kb
056
172
056/171 and 170/172 (1 ng, 200 pg, 40 pg)
PRIMARY PCR
REACTIONS
SECONDARY
PCR
REACTIONS
Grxcr1: Results
• Grxd1 #4 replaced faulty wild type
Grxcr1/C023 clone
• Considerable attempts to improve the
specificity/yield of the products:
– Altered annealing temperatures and cycling
conditions during PCR
– Different amounts of templates
– Purification of initial smaller products
Grxcr1: Results (most recent)
• Third PCR amplification with DK177/178: initial
gel with this indicated likely expressed product
– Used PrimerSelect to order new primers that fit
certain conditions
177
178
~1.0kb
Grxcr1: Results (repeatability!)
• New starting point
from 227 and 923
insert sizes (1:20)
–Standard dilutions
(initial product
above from
1:10000 dilution)
–Ran under 60°
annealing
temp/35x cycles 1:1000 generated the
right size product!
Mutant Expression in Eukaryotic Cells
• COS7: fibroblasts from African Green monkeys
– Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 know to localize to actin
filament-rich filopodia
• CL4: epithelial cells derived from pig kidneys
– Fibroblasts to epithelial cells (tight junctions)
– Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 know to localize to actin
filament-rich microvilli on top
Mutant Expression: Methods
• Plate cells on glass coverslips
• Transfection of plasmid DNA with LTX reagent
• Fix/permeabilize transfected cells
– Incubate with anti-GFP primary antibody (mouse)
and anti-PP1 primary antibody (rabbit)
– Identify location of protein-antibody complexes
with secondary antibodies:
• Anti-mouse IgG-Alex488 (green for GFP complexes)
• Anti-rabbit IgG-Alex594 (red for PP1 complexes)
Mutant Expression: Results
• Expected:
– Localization of wild type Grxcr2-GFP (and Grxcr1-
GFP) to microvilli of CL4/filopodia of Cos7 cells
• Experimental Questions:
– Localization of mutant proteins?
– Altered localization of PP1 in mutant expressing
cells?
Results: Mutant less microvilli enrichment
CL4 C024 (wild type)
CL4 C026 (mutant)
eGFP parent plasmid
Results: PP1 similar in WT/mutant
C024 GFP C026 GFP eGFP GFP
C026 PP1C024 PP1 eGFP PP1
In Conclusion/Future Work
• Grxcr2 mutant sequence confirmed
• Grxcr1 mutant clone yet to be generated
• Continue to experiment with Grxcr1 mutant to
replicate initial overlap
• Continue to follow up on transfected cells (i.e.
laser scope microscope for fine sections)
– Top of cell vs. inside of cell
– (Small region of N-terminus needed for localization)
Acknowledgments
• Dr. Kohrman
• Cathy, Catherine, Jessica
• Kresge Hearing Research Institute (KHRI)
• National Institute on Deafness and Other
Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

More Related Content

PDF
ganzyme PDF.pdf
PDF
emm201548a
DOCX
Summer Scholarship 2014 Outcomes
PDF
Glyco special hart
PPT
FMRP RGG box methylation
PDF
Molecular Biology Lab Poster
PPTX
ReedWoyda_Introducing Green Fluorescence Into Homo sapiens And Escherichia Co...
ganzyme PDF.pdf
emm201548a
Summer Scholarship 2014 Outcomes
Glyco special hart
FMRP RGG box methylation
Molecular Biology Lab Poster
ReedWoyda_Introducing Green Fluorescence Into Homo sapiens And Escherichia Co...

What's hot (19)

PDF
Tiggrin
PDF
GAPDH, a well-known glycolytic enzyme, mediates
PPT
PPT
RNase A and RNase L localization
PPTX
2015 DevSem NIH
PPTX
Talk at Developmental Workshop NIH
PDF
PNAS_CCR5_drug_binding
PDF
John Donlan Proposal FD
PPT
Imaginal discs1
PDF
Reprint Microbiology-UK Aug 2014
PDF
Ectopic Expression of Hawthorn SND1 Gene in Tobacco
PPTX
Work presentation
PPTX
PPTX
Lab Meeting 2nd Semester- Investigating genes involved in root growth respons...
PPT
ROSSI.Francesca_Farmacia_Colloqui
DOCX
Honours Report Draft COMPLETE
PPTX
B-box proteins in plants bbx family of plant transcription factors
PPTX
Nrd Ra Treatment[2] Ppt $2$ $1$
Tiggrin
GAPDH, a well-known glycolytic enzyme, mediates
RNase A and RNase L localization
2015 DevSem NIH
Talk at Developmental Workshop NIH
PNAS_CCR5_drug_binding
John Donlan Proposal FD
Imaginal discs1
Reprint Microbiology-UK Aug 2014
Ectopic Expression of Hawthorn SND1 Gene in Tobacco
Work presentation
Lab Meeting 2nd Semester- Investigating genes involved in root growth respons...
ROSSI.Francesca_Farmacia_Colloqui
Honours Report Draft COMPLETE
B-box proteins in plants bbx family of plant transcription factors
Nrd Ra Treatment[2] Ppt $2$ $1$
Ad

Viewers also liked (14)

PDF
maghale tahfighe Khore Gharbi
PPT
ניהול השקעות וחסכון
PPS
africa | www.mototol.ro |
PDF
SOLAR BOTTLE
PPTX
El verbo 3°
PDF
J309561442777400
DOC
2012 [Www.Mototol.Ro]
DOC
Mahindra Electric Announcement - Press Release
PPTX
Мой любимый браузер
PPS
Anomalii pe marte [Www.Mototol.Ro]
PPTX
COLD ROOM WITH SOLAR SUPPRT
PPTX
Do zobaczenia na Snapie!- czyli o komunikacji młodego pokolenia
PDF
What Happens After You Get A New Lead?
maghale tahfighe Khore Gharbi
ניהול השקעות וחסכון
africa | www.mototol.ro |
SOLAR BOTTLE
El verbo 3°
J309561442777400
2012 [Www.Mototol.Ro]
Mahindra Electric Announcement - Press Release
Мой любимый браузер
Anomalii pe marte [Www.Mototol.Ro]
COLD ROOM WITH SOLAR SUPPRT
Do zobaczenia na Snapie!- czyli o komunikacji młodego pokolenia
What Happens After You Get A New Lead?
Ad

KHRI Final Presentation_FINAL

  • 1. Kresge Summer Research Internship – Final Presentation Keerthana Velappan Mentor: Dr. David Kohrman August 6th, 2015
  • 2. Introduction to Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 • Cochlear-specific genes required for stereocilia development and maintenance • Grxcr1 spontaneous mutant: pirouette (pi) • Grxcr2 targeted mutant
  • 4. Preliminary Correction • Actions of Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 affect development and maintenance of stereocilia, likely through effects on actin filament architecture (structure and rigidity)
  • 5. How does Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 work?
  • 6. Putative PP1 Binding Sites Grxcr1 interacts with/inhibits PP1 phosphatase Hendricks, A., et al. (2009). Chemistry and Biology, 16:365-371. RKVRF
  • 7. Hypothesis/Experimental Test • Hypothesis – Grxcr1 (and/or Grxcr2) exerts effects on stereocilia by control of phosphorylation via interaction with/inhibition of PP1 • Experimental Test – Delete 5 a.a. (15bp) predicted PP1 interaction site from Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 • Express wild type and mutant proteins from peGFP-N1 hybrid plasmid vector
  • 9. Predictions for Hypothesis • If hypothesis is correct… – Cells expressing mutant proteins (relative to wild type) expected to exhibit alterations in PP1 localization and/or phosphorylation activity – Mutant proteins expected to lack ability to ‘correct’ stereocilia defects in explant cultures (wild type expected to correct those defects)
  • 10. Initial Work • Generation of Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 mutant plasmids (without 5 a.a./15bp PP1 site) • Methods for Grxcr2 – Site-directed mutagenesis – Bacterial transformation • Methods for Grxcr1 – Overlap PCR
  • 12. Site-Directed Mutagenesis (cont’d) • Add WT plasmid/mutant oligos – Complementary genes (oligos) • Denature both components • DNA polymerase extends oligos during temperature cycling, incorporates mutation – Stem-loop structure (15 nucleotide deletion) – High-fidelity low error rate polymerase (Pfu) – Extend 3’ end of oligos – Product treated with DpnI/nicked DNA is transformed • WT template is methylated=> DpnI-sensitive fragments (cuts/circle) • Mutated molecule unmethylated=> DpnI-resistant
  • 13. Grxcr2: Results • Confirmed overall structure of mutant plasmid: BamH1-EcoRI restriction enzyme digest
  • 14. Grxcr2: Results (cont’d) • Confirmed deletion is only in one place => sequencing (used SeqMan to align sequences)
  • 15. Grxcr1: Overlap PCR 056 170 171 172 227bp 923bp 1.1kb 056 172
  • 16. 056/171 and 170/172 (1 ng, 200 pg, 40 pg) PRIMARY PCR REACTIONS
  • 18. Grxcr1: Results • Grxd1 #4 replaced faulty wild type Grxcr1/C023 clone • Considerable attempts to improve the specificity/yield of the products: – Altered annealing temperatures and cycling conditions during PCR – Different amounts of templates – Purification of initial smaller products
  • 19. Grxcr1: Results (most recent) • Third PCR amplification with DK177/178: initial gel with this indicated likely expressed product – Used PrimerSelect to order new primers that fit certain conditions 177 178 ~1.0kb
  • 20. Grxcr1: Results (repeatability!) • New starting point from 227 and 923 insert sizes (1:20) –Standard dilutions (initial product above from 1:10000 dilution) –Ran under 60° annealing temp/35x cycles 1:1000 generated the right size product!
  • 21. Mutant Expression in Eukaryotic Cells • COS7: fibroblasts from African Green monkeys – Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 know to localize to actin filament-rich filopodia • CL4: epithelial cells derived from pig kidneys – Fibroblasts to epithelial cells (tight junctions) – Grxcr1 and Grxcr2 know to localize to actin filament-rich microvilli on top
  • 22. Mutant Expression: Methods • Plate cells on glass coverslips • Transfection of plasmid DNA with LTX reagent • Fix/permeabilize transfected cells – Incubate with anti-GFP primary antibody (mouse) and anti-PP1 primary antibody (rabbit) – Identify location of protein-antibody complexes with secondary antibodies: • Anti-mouse IgG-Alex488 (green for GFP complexes) • Anti-rabbit IgG-Alex594 (red for PP1 complexes)
  • 23. Mutant Expression: Results • Expected: – Localization of wild type Grxcr2-GFP (and Grxcr1- GFP) to microvilli of CL4/filopodia of Cos7 cells • Experimental Questions: – Localization of mutant proteins? – Altered localization of PP1 in mutant expressing cells?
  • 24. Results: Mutant less microvilli enrichment CL4 C024 (wild type) CL4 C026 (mutant) eGFP parent plasmid
  • 25. Results: PP1 similar in WT/mutant C024 GFP C026 GFP eGFP GFP C026 PP1C024 PP1 eGFP PP1
  • 26. In Conclusion/Future Work • Grxcr2 mutant sequence confirmed • Grxcr1 mutant clone yet to be generated • Continue to experiment with Grxcr1 mutant to replicate initial overlap • Continue to follow up on transfected cells (i.e. laser scope microscope for fine sections) – Top of cell vs. inside of cell – (Small region of N-terminus needed for localization)
  • 27. Acknowledgments • Dr. Kohrman • Cathy, Catherine, Jessica • Kresge Hearing Research Institute (KHRI) • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

Editor's Notes

  • #3: Grxcr1: left picture is wild type (normal stereocilia) and right picture is mutant (affected stereocilia) MUTATION ARISES NATURALLY (not from mutagens) Grxcr2: top row is wild type and bottom row is mutant (MUTATION ELIMINATES GENE FUNCTION => KNOCKOUTS)
  • #4: N-terminus: start of amino acid chain (specific to structures rich in actin, such as stereocilia and microvilli) De-glutathionylation: modifies protein by removing glutathione molecule (via breakage of disulfide linkage) Cysteine: sulfur-containing amino acid Dimerization: forming dimers (two identical molecules) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Glutaredoxin distantly related, don’t have activity Cysteine-rich (groups of 4) primitive eukaryotes, binding DNA or other proteins (dimers of 2 identical proteins or 2 Grxcr1/cr2 heterodimers)
  • #5: PROVIDE STRUCTURE AND RIGIDITY TO STEREOCILIA VERY LITTLE ACTIN IN MUTANT EXCEPT THOSE EXPRESSED IN WT THROUGH TRANSFECTION (mutant cannot correct this deficit) GFP HYBRID GREEN RED ACTIN FILAMENT (PP1)
  • #7: PP1 phosphatase: removes phosphates from Ser (serine) and Thr (threonine) residues Protein phosphorylation controls some aspects of actin filament dynamics (previous slide) Red line (RKVRF) is PP1 binding site/motif (5 amino acids => 15 nucleotides/base pairs) N-terminus 1.5 lines Glutaredoxin 2.5 lines Cysteine-rich last line
  • #8: Phosphorylation: addition of phosphate group eGFP: enhanced green fluorescent protein
  • #9: Grxcr1: 950 base pairs (insert size) Grxcr2: 789 base pairs (little smaller) GFP attached to C-terminus (end of amino acid chain)
  • #10: Follow up from earlier (stereocilia correction)
  • #11: Site-directed mutagenesis: site-specific/targeted mutation Bacterial transformation: bacterial cells take up DNA molecules Overlap PCR: overlap extension PCR cloning is a simple and reliable way to create recombinant plasmids (clone an insert into a plasmid)
  • #12: In-vitro reaction Denaturation (DNA template), annealing (melting) primers with mutations, extension (of primers with DNA polymerase) DpnI digestion of template Transform mutated molecule into competent cells for nick repair
  • #13: Oligo(nucleotide) => short sequence that matches mutation region High-fidelity low error rate: high match with minimum mistakes (in extension process) Extend 3’ ends => Goal is complete circle (circular map) with break in it Nicked vector DNA incorporating desired mutations transformed into ultracompetent cells Dpn-I will distinguish mutant from WT because will cut WT and not mutant (resistance)
  • #14: 100bp ladder M1, M2, M4, M5 1kb ladder Cut circular DNA twice => 2 fragments (expected fragment sizes) B-E plasmid (Grxcr2 insert) ~800 Vector plasmid ~
  • #15: TOP SEQ IS WT Cr2 mutant sequence alignment- without 5 amino acids (PP1 binding site/motif) (reverse primer DK172) (forward primer DK056)
  • #16: Primary PCRs (2 separate reactions) to generate 2 overlapping DNA fragments/products, then a secondary PCR to produce the single larger product (anneal together) Overlap PCR involves denaturation, annealing (melting), and extension: (vector and insert are mixed, denatured, and annealed) => extension (DNA polymerase uses vector as a template until polymerase reaches 5’ end of the insert) After several PCR cycles, new plasmid with two nicks (one on each strand) gets accumulated as a product New plasmid can be transformed into E. coli after parental plasmid is destroyed by DpnI digest
  • #17: Primary PCR reactions- 2 sets of primers and 3 dilutions each
  • #18: Secondary PCR reaction (056172)- combined 20 microliters of 40pg from initial reactions and ran dilutions (1:100, 1:1000, 1:10000); background/artifacts in 1:1000 Purified 1:1000 and ran dilutions (1:100, 1:1000, 1:10000)- overlap product visible/evident/present
  • #19: Annealing temps (65 vs. 60) and cycling conditions (3-step vs. 2-step-no annealing and 30x repetitions vs. 35x) Dilutions of templates (10^-2 to 10^-6)- 1:100, 1:1000, 1:10000, 1:100000, 1:1000000 PCR column purification (cleaning up product via mini centrifuge) vs. gel purification (cut out gel product to be purified and similar to PCR purification, except melt the gel first)
  • #21: 20-folds dilution of 227 because more product Standard dilutions => 1:100, 1:1000, 1:10000 SHOW RECENT IMAGE BUT NOT REPEATABLE REPEATABILITY IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE NEED TO GENERATE ENOUGH PRODUCT TO EFFICIENTLY ISOLATE AND TRANSFECT INTO CLONE
  • #22: -DMEM vs. (alpha)MEM -Fibroblasts to epithelial cells over few days -Microvilli serves as proxy model for stereocilia
  • #23: Anti-GFP primary antibody in mouse and then anti-mouse secondary antibody (green for GFP) Anti-PP1 primary antibody in rabbit and then anti-rabbit secondary antibody (red for PP1)
  • #25: Strong microvilli expression in wild type (along edges) Stability unaffected (medium/low/high levels) -> rule out trivial explanation (I.e. protein misfolding) Mutant weaker expression than WT and eGFP similar to mutant MUTANT LESS MICROVILLI ENRICHMENT WT STRONG MICROVILLI ENRICHMENT EXPECTED MUTANT AND WT TO BE SAME ALTERED LOCALIZATION OF MUTANT MUTANT PROTEIN NOT ENRICHED IN MICROVILLI
  • #26: GFP and PP1 in WT/mutant/eGFP parent plasmid Mutants would be different without PP1 interaction (increased PP1 enrichment– filopodia and microvilli – in wild type) Can’t separate localization from PP1 => difficult to extract relevance of PP1 itself (difficult to distinguish defect itself) Structure-function analysis > small region necessary for localization (unclear whether or not it affects PP1 activity) PP1 SIMILAR IN WT AND MUTANT SMALL REGION IN N-TERMINUS (5 A.A.) NECESSARY FOR LOCALIZATION
  • #27: SHOW PICTURES OF WT AND MUTANT TO SHOW THAT LASER MICROSCOPE WOULD ALLOW FOR HIGHER RESOLUTION (LOOKING AT TOP OF CELL VS. INSIDE OF CELL)