Lab for plate boundaries

Lab 11:
Discovering Plate Boundaries
(modified from a lab developed by Dale Sawyer, Rice University)
In the early 1960s, the emergence of the theory of plate tectonics started a revolution in the earth
sciences. Subsequent verification and refinement of the theory has led scientists to recognize that,
directly or indirectly, plate tectonics influences nearly all geologic processes.
The theory of plate tectonics states that the Earth’s outermost layer is fragmented
into a dozen or more thin, shell-like plates that are moving relative to one another
as they ride atop a hotter underlying layer.
In this lab, we will infer the locations and types of plate boundaries around the globe by using
several types of scientific data. In fact, the data types are the same ones used by scientists in the
late 1950s and 1960s to develop the theory of plate tectonics.
______________________________________________________________________________
Please do NOT consult a textbook, wall map, or any other outside source during this lab.
______________________________________________________________________________
Step A: Assemble in Scientific Specialty groups as directed by your instructor.
Your instructor will assign you to one of the following Scientific Specialties; circle the specialty
to which you’ve been assigned.
Seismology — the study of earthquakes
Volcanology — the study of volcanoes
Geography — the study of topography (on land) and bathymetry (on the seafloor)
Geochronology — the study of the ages of rock formation
SJSU Geol 4L Planet Earth Lab
Lab 11 p. 1 of 10

Step B: Look at your group’s map and talk about what you see.
For the point data (seismology, volcanology), look at distribution patterns.
For surface data (geography, geochronology), look for variations in values, especially at the high
and low ends of the range.
Some terms to consider (this isn’t a checklist; some won’t apply to your map):

present? absent?
narrow? wide? straight? curved?

symmetric? asymmetric? variable? constant? deep? shallow?
Be especially aware of patterns, variations, etc. that suggest a major boundary is present. These
will be candidates for possible plate boundaries.
Work as a group. Let everyone talk about what they see.
Step C: Use your observations to infer the possible locations of major boundaries.
1. Based on your group’s observations in Step B, use a regular lead pencil to show the locations
of possible major boundaries on the map on p. 6.
2. List the speciﬁc criteria you used to infer the locations of plate boundaries. Include a sketch if
it helps, but be sure your reasoning is clear from the text you write.
Lab 11 p. 2 of 10

3. Now try to divide your boundaries into “types” that share similar characteristics as expressed
in your data set. Each specialty should be able to propose at least two types, and some groups
should be able to propose up to four types. Try not to apply what you knew before coming to
class. Just use your observations as the basis for this classification attempt.
Briefly list the key characteristics of each boundary type below (minimum 2, up to 4 maximum).
Type 1
Type 2
Type 3
Type 4
4. On your map on p. 6, label the possible boundaries that you identified in C1 with the possible
types you proposed in C3.
That’s it for the map on p. 6. Leave it as is; no modifications later! You won’t be graded on
whether it’s “right” or not, but instead on wheter your proposed boundaries are reasonable
based on the data in your particular Scientific Specialty.
Step D: Reorganize into groups of 4, with one person from each Scientific Specialty per group.
Lab 11 p. 3 of 10

Step E: Share your observations and interpretations.
Briefly explain to one another the following:
* how you interpret the patterns and variations in the data of your Scientific Specialty
* where you inferred major boundaries on the world map
* the boundary types you proposed in C4, and your reasons for your classification
Step F. Develop a second map of inferred plate boundaries.
Compare the locations and types of plate boundaries that each of you inferred from your particu-
lar scientific specialty. Your interpretations probably differ (which is fine).
1. Reconcile the differences and propose a consensus group map of boundaries; show these
boundaries on the world map on p. 7.
2. Develop a revised set of boundary types (up to 4) and describe them below.
Type 1
Type 2
Type 3
Type 4
Step G. Inform your instructor after you have completed Step F.
Your instructor will distribute a world map showing the positions of plate boundaries as currently
understood by geoscientists. Compare your group’s map to the “professional” one. If they differ
in some ways, remember that the scientists have access to much more, and much more detailed,
data sets than the ones we used in this lab.
Lab 11 p. 4 of 10

Step H. Obtain key facts about plate boundaries.
Your instructor will give a brief presentation about the types of plate boundaries that geoscien-
tists currently recognize, and will distribute a double-sided “fact sheet.”
Step I. Formally classify global plate boundaries.
1. Use the information from the presentation and fact sheet to classify the boundaries on the map
of the plates. Use colored pencils to distinguish the boundary types, and make sure that you add
to your map a legend explaining what each color means.
2. List the formally recognized boundary types below, and specify which criteria are most diag-
nostic of each. In other words, if you were investigating another Earth-like planet on which plate
tectonics operated, which features/patterns/variations/etc. would you use to infer each boundary
type? The criteria may be from any Scientiﬁc Specialty, and two or more may be diagnostic of a
particular boundary type.
Lab 11 p. 5 of 10

Lab 11 p. 6 of 10

Lab 11 p. 7 of 10

Lab 11 p. 8 of 10

Web Assignment 11. Earthquakes & Plate Boundaries
As you learned this week in lab, most (but not all) earthquakes happen at plate boundaries. In
this Web activity, you’ll use online resources to investigate some major historical earthquakes,
from the U.S. and around the world.
Earthquake PB? PB type Which plates?
Anchorage, Alaska 1964
Charleston, S. Carolina 1886
Chile 1960
Indian Ocean (Indonesia) 2004
Izmit, Turkey 1999
New Madrid, Missouri 1811-12
northern India 1950
San Francisco 1906
Tokyo, Japan 1923
Washington-Oregon coast 1700
For each earthquake in the preceding list, answer question A below. If you answer yes to A (hint:
you should for most of them!), then answer B and C also.
A. Did this earthquake happen at a modern plate boundary?
B. What type of plate boundary produced the earthquake?
C. Which two plates are present at the boundary?
For this activity, we will consider plate boundaries to be one of four types:
Subduction zone: oceanic lithosphere sinks under another plate (ocean or continent)
Collision zone: continental lithosphere collides with continental lithosphere
Divergent: oceanic lithosphere forms, splits, and separates
Transform: two plates move horizontally past one another
Most plate boundaries are narrow, so assume that an earthquake did NOT happen on a plate
boundary if its epicenter is hundreds of kilometers away from a boundary drawn on a map.
Lab 11 p. 9 of 10

You can proceed however you like, but here are some recommended steps:
* Use Google. For each earthquake, enter “epicenter earthquake year” (e.g., epicenter Chile
1960) and look for a map that shows the epicenter (i.e., the point on Earth’s surface above where
the earthquake happened).
* Use either the source from Google or a map of the world’s tectonic plates
(http://geology.er.usgs.gov/eastern/plates.html) to determine the answer to question A.
* If the answer to A is yes, determine the answers to B and C. You might ﬁnd what you need in
your links from Google, or you may ﬁnd this map of plate boundaries useful:
http://volcano.und.nodak.edu/vwdocs/Submarine/plates/
* If you need to review the types of plate boundaries, or need other reference material on plate
tectonics, try this USGS Web site (an on-line text, so you may need to click around a bit):
http://pubs.usgs.gov/publications/text/dynamic.html
Answer the following questions when you’re done with the earthquake list.
11. Although the list is very short, it’s pretty representative of major earthquakes over the past
200 years. Which type of plate boundary seems to have the fewest damaging earthquakes?
12. Why do you think this is the case? [Hint: Consider what makes an earthquake “damaging.”]
Lab 11 p. 10 of 10

Lab for plate boundaries

More Related Content

Similar to Lab for plate boundaries (20)

More from Lori Welsh (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Lab for plate boundaries