LAND USE EFFECTS ON LITTER
                                                                                                                                     DECOMPOSITION IN TROPICAL
                                                                                                                                         ECOSYSTEMS IN MEXICO
                                                                                                                    Moreno–Miranda, Dulce María, Lizbeth Guzmán–Moreno,
                                                                                                                     Guadalupe Barajas–Guzmán1, Javier Álvarez–Sánchez*
                                                                                                               Depto. de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias,
                                                                                                                  Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MÉXICO
    Facultad de Ciencias                                                                                 *javier.alvarez@ciencias.unam.mx, 1guadalub@miranda.ecologia.unam.mx
  Primary productivity and decomposition are the main processes in the ecosystem. Decomposition is a very important part of the nutrient cycling,
 give resources to plant nutrition, and there is an important pathway of energy flux. The analysis of this ecosystem process is necessary to identify
                                    the ecosystem services and to improve the ecosystem management programs.

                                                                                                                                                     Mexico: Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve
                                                                                                                                         It is located in the state of Veracruz in the coastal plains of the Gulf of Mexico.
                                                                                                                           The region of Los Tuxtlas is a volcanic massif dating back to the Tertiary period, lava flows,
                                                                                                                                                        volcanic ash, and other pyroclastics cover almost the entire area.
                                                                                                                             The altitudinal range is from sea level to 1,780 meters with the San Martin Tuxtla volcano
                                                                                                                                                                                                   as the highest elevation.
                                                                                                                              The climate of the region is hot and sub humid on the coastal plains, and temperate and
                                                                                                                                                                                                    humid in the highlands.
                                                                                                                                      The Los Tuxtlas reserve is one of the most threatened protected areas in Mexico
                                                                                                                                                           because the land use changes for crops and livestock farming.
                                                                                                                                This has led to continuous and rapid disappearance of habitat and natural vegetation.
                                                                                                                           Three sites (windows) were selected in the benchmark site in order to study soil organisms
                                                                                                                                for their diversity and functional attributes, selected according to disturbance gradient,
                                                                                                                                       associated with three communities or “ejidos”: Adolfo Lopez Mateos, Venustiano
                                                                                                                                                                                   Carranza and San Fernando (Figure 1).
                                          Figure 1. Sites (windows) in Los Tuxtlas Region (Modificado de Garcia, 2005).




   Objective and Methods
The aim of this study was to determine the litter decomposition differences in four land uses (Figure 2). López
 Mateos and Venustiano Carranza windows have the higher and lowest vegetation cover, respectively. Using
  the leaf litter, a six month experiment was carried out. Using the litter bag method, litter decomposition was
estimated with the remaining weight proportion (RWP) in a monthly survey. Carbon, Nitrogen and the C:N ratio
                      contents were quantified, at the beginning and the end of the experiment.



                                                                                                             Labels of aluminium
                                                                                                             for every bag of
                                                                                                             mesh for his
                                                                                                             identification




                                                                                                                                                                                                             Figure 2. Land uses.

                                                                                                                                            Stock exchanges placed in the use of corresponding soil
       Litter of every type of land use                                                                              Litter bags




    Results
       For San Fernando window
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Table 1. Results of the laboratory analysis of nutriments
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Table 1
(intermediate disturbance regime) and
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Community          Lopez Mateos              San Fernando       Venustiano Carranza
   Venustiano Carranza, pasture had
                                                                                                                                                                                                         Land use       Time Initial      Final      Initial   Final      Initial   Final
  higher decomposition rates, and the                                                                                                                                                                                    C      46.53    25.44* *   46.29       46.85     48.73     45.48
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Agroforestry
    dry weight loss was 59.63% and                                                                                                                                                                                       N       1.95     1.27*      1.72       2.18*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    *      1.53      1.68
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        C:N     23.87     19.97     26.83      21.52*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    *     31.91     27.08
     68.74%, respectively. At López                                                                                                                                                                                      C      44.47    26.09*     44.81      29.49*     46.41     26.55**
                                                                                                                                                                                                       Maize crop
  Mateos, higher decomposition rates                                                                                                                                                                                     N       2.53       2.1      0.38       0.61*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    *      1.87     1.28**
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        C:N     17.58     12.42     118.86     48.23*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    *     24.87     20.75
     (54.37%) were observed in the                                                                                                                                                                                       C       42.6    18.54*     43.49       43.23      45.1     39.1**
                                                                                                                                                                                                         Pasture         N       0.77      1.08      0.84       1.22*       0.8     1.22**
           tropical rain forest.                                                                                                                                                                                        C:N     55.44    17.11*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              *      51.68     35.38*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    *     56.7      32.03*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         *
 C:N were significant different in most                                                                                                                                                                                  C      46.01    32.96*      46.25      43.9      46.15     45.28
  of the windows and land use (Table                                                                                                                                                                      Forest         N       2.22     1.97        1.85     2.21**      1.29     1.65*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        *
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        C:N     20.75    16.72*      25.02     19.83*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    *     35.79     27.48*
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         *
                    1).                                                                                                                                                                               * Differences significant p<0.05
                                                                                                                                                                                                      * Differences significant p<0.05


       Conclusion
   In general the slowest decomposition is given in the land use of maize and the most rapid in the pastures, while
     in the site with major coverage (Lopez Mateos) the slowest rate of decomposition was registered. Though it is
    true that the quality of the fraction to foliate turned out to be important, it is necessary to correlate these results
     with the information of microclimate and fauna of the soil for every window and use of soil. Land use and litter
         quality (C and N) determines differences in decomposition rates, but it is not clear that vegetation cover                                                                                                                                 Acknowledgements
                                          differences affect this ecosystem process.                                                                                                                                              Irene Sánchez Gallén
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Sá        Gallé
                                                                                                                                                                                                         Tropical Biology Station Los Tuxtlas, UNAM
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Tuxtlas,
                                                                                                                                                                                            Laboratory of Fertility of Soils, Colegio de Posgraduados
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Soils,
                                                                                                                                                                                                            Mariel Ramírez and Alejandra Escamilla
                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Ramí
                                                                                                                                                                             Dra. Isabelle Barois, Martín de los Santos and Dr. José Antonio García
                                                                                                                                                                                           Barois, Martí                            José          Garcí

More Related Content

PDF
Rethinking the Zoological Park: The 21st Century Zoo as a Sustainable Fixture
PDF
Report of guanica and yunque 1
DOCX
Tree species composition and above ground tree biomass estimation
PDF
A comparative study of the physical and chemical properties of soils under di...
PDF
PK06:Distribution of Soil Organisms in Diverse Tropical Ecosystems: The Impac...
PDF
Peat swamp forest degradation: A comparison between Indonesia and Peru
DOCX
Karlov_GIS_Mapping_Final (2)
PDF
JesseMiller_MalcolmNichols_FireAndLULCResearchPaper.docx
Rethinking the Zoological Park: The 21st Century Zoo as a Sustainable Fixture
Report of guanica and yunque 1
Tree species composition and above ground tree biomass estimation
A comparative study of the physical and chemical properties of soils under di...
PK06:Distribution of Soil Organisms in Diverse Tropical Ecosystems: The Impac...
Peat swamp forest degradation: A comparison between Indonesia and Peru
Karlov_GIS_Mapping_Final (2)
JesseMiller_MalcolmNichols_FireAndLULCResearchPaper.docx

Similar to Land use effects on litter decomposition in tropical ecosystems in mexico (20)

PDF
Gjesm150171451593800
PPTX
Landscape ecology (2013bpln010)
PDF
Diversity of Soil Fauna and Ecosystem Function
PDF
Reforestation in the Cerro Candelaria Reserve
PDF
monte desertfrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...
PDF
Do fine-scale factors shape the use of riparian galleries by carnivores in a ...
PDF
WOODY PLANT RICHNESS AND NDVI RESPONSE TO DROUGHT EVENTS IN CATALONIAN (NORT...
PPT
Water2010
PDF
MAMMALS, EDGE EFFECTS, AND THE LOSS OF TROPICAL FOREST DIVERSITY Asquith & Me...
PDF
Pardini et al. 2015
PDF
Termite footprints in restored versus degraded agrosystems in southwestern Ni...
PDF
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
PPTX
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY A2 REVISION - TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTS: TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS
PDF
3. UNIT 3 Environmental studies note.pdf
PDF
Effects of Vegetation Change and Land Use/ Land Cover Change on Land Surface ...
PDF
El futuro de los bosques y de los descortezadores?
PDF
Vegetation dynamics in the western himalayas, diversity indices and climate c...
PDF
Restoration, Reconciliation, and Reconnecting with Nature Nearby
PDF
Poster65: Landscape management and the provision of soil ecosystem services i...
PPTX
Ecology ecological succession
Gjesm150171451593800
Landscape ecology (2013bpln010)
Diversity of Soil Fauna and Ecosystem Function
Reforestation in the Cerro Candelaria Reserve
monte desertfrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...
Do fine-scale factors shape the use of riparian galleries by carnivores in a ...
WOODY PLANT RICHNESS AND NDVI RESPONSE TO DROUGHT EVENTS IN CATALONIAN (NORT...
Water2010
MAMMALS, EDGE EFFECTS, AND THE LOSS OF TROPICAL FOREST DIVERSITY Asquith & Me...
Pardini et al. 2015
Termite footprints in restored versus degraded agrosystems in southwestern Ni...
Diversity and ecology of macrofauna in land use mosaics embu and taita distri...
CAMBRIDGE GEOGRAPHY A2 REVISION - TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTS: TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS
3. UNIT 3 Environmental studies note.pdf
Effects of Vegetation Change and Land Use/ Land Cover Change on Land Surface ...
El futuro de los bosques y de los descortezadores?
Vegetation dynamics in the western himalayas, diversity indices and climate c...
Restoration, Reconciliation, and Reconnecting with Nature Nearby
Poster65: Landscape management and the provision of soil ecosystem services i...
Ecology ecological succession
Ad

More from CSM _BGBD biodiversity (20)

PDF
The solution to global warming could be in the soil
PDF
Land use and community composition of arbusscular mycorrhizal fungi mabira fo...
PDF
Changes in the diversity of assemblages of ground foraging ants in response t...
PDF
PDF
PDF
PDF
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
PDF
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
PDF
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
PDF
Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using ...
PDF
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
PDF
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
PDF
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
PDF
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
PDF
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
PDF
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
PDF
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
PDF
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
PDF
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
PDF
OP27: Contrasting Benchmark Sites on Bio-physical and Socio-economic Charact...
The solution to global warming could be in the soil
Land use and community composition of arbusscular mycorrhizal fungi mabira fo...
Changes in the diversity of assemblages of ground foraging ants in response t...
Nematode community structure as influenced by land use and intensity of culti...
Diversity of ant species across a gradient of land use types in western ghats...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
Studies on microbial inoculation in the preparation of phospho compost using ...
Farming practices and soil health arbsucular mcorrhizal fungi (amf) in maize ...
Soil fauna and nutrient management for improving agricultural production thro...
Diversity of termites along a gradient of land use type in a tropical forest ...
Termites diversity along a gradient of land use in a tropical forest margin, ...
Assemblages of soil nematodes and land use systems in the benchmark site of a...
Land use changes the structure of soil bacterial communities in the western a...
OP25:Soliciting for prominence of belowground biodiversity conservation and m...
OP29:PROPOSALS FROM THE NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
OP26:Socio-Economic Characteristics, Impact Assessment and Policy Analysis of...
OP27: Contrasting Benchmark Sites on Bio-physical and Socio-economic Charact...
Ad

Land use effects on litter decomposition in tropical ecosystems in mexico

  • 1. LAND USE EFFECTS ON LITTER DECOMPOSITION IN TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS IN MEXICO Moreno–Miranda, Dulce María, Lizbeth Guzmán–Moreno, Guadalupe Barajas–Guzmán1, Javier Álvarez–Sánchez* Depto. de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MÉXICO Facultad de Ciencias *javier.alvarez@ciencias.unam.mx, 1guadalub@miranda.ecologia.unam.mx Primary productivity and decomposition are the main processes in the ecosystem. Decomposition is a very important part of the nutrient cycling, give resources to plant nutrition, and there is an important pathway of energy flux. The analysis of this ecosystem process is necessary to identify the ecosystem services and to improve the ecosystem management programs. Mexico: Los Tuxtlas Biosphere Reserve It is located in the state of Veracruz in the coastal plains of the Gulf of Mexico. The region of Los Tuxtlas is a volcanic massif dating back to the Tertiary period, lava flows, volcanic ash, and other pyroclastics cover almost the entire area. The altitudinal range is from sea level to 1,780 meters with the San Martin Tuxtla volcano as the highest elevation. The climate of the region is hot and sub humid on the coastal plains, and temperate and humid in the highlands. The Los Tuxtlas reserve is one of the most threatened protected areas in Mexico because the land use changes for crops and livestock farming. This has led to continuous and rapid disappearance of habitat and natural vegetation. Three sites (windows) were selected in the benchmark site in order to study soil organisms for their diversity and functional attributes, selected according to disturbance gradient, associated with three communities or “ejidos”: Adolfo Lopez Mateos, Venustiano Carranza and San Fernando (Figure 1). Figure 1. Sites (windows) in Los Tuxtlas Region (Modificado de Garcia, 2005). Objective and Methods The aim of this study was to determine the litter decomposition differences in four land uses (Figure 2). López Mateos and Venustiano Carranza windows have the higher and lowest vegetation cover, respectively. Using the leaf litter, a six month experiment was carried out. Using the litter bag method, litter decomposition was estimated with the remaining weight proportion (RWP) in a monthly survey. Carbon, Nitrogen and the C:N ratio contents were quantified, at the beginning and the end of the experiment. Labels of aluminium for every bag of mesh for his identification Figure 2. Land uses. Stock exchanges placed in the use of corresponding soil Litter of every type of land use Litter bags Results For San Fernando window Table 1. Results of the laboratory analysis of nutriments Table 1 (intermediate disturbance regime) and Community Lopez Mateos San Fernando Venustiano Carranza Venustiano Carranza, pasture had Land use Time Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final higher decomposition rates, and the C 46.53 25.44* * 46.29 46.85 48.73 45.48 Agroforestry dry weight loss was 59.63% and N 1.95 1.27* 1.72 2.18* * 1.53 1.68 C:N 23.87 19.97 26.83 21.52* * 31.91 27.08 68.74%, respectively. At López C 44.47 26.09* 44.81 29.49* 46.41 26.55** Maize crop Mateos, higher decomposition rates N 2.53 2.1 0.38 0.61* * 1.87 1.28** C:N 17.58 12.42 118.86 48.23* * 24.87 20.75 (54.37%) were observed in the C 42.6 18.54* 43.49 43.23 45.1 39.1** Pasture N 0.77 1.08 0.84 1.22* 0.8 1.22** tropical rain forest. C:N 55.44 17.11* * 51.68 35.38* * 56.7 32.03* * C:N were significant different in most C 46.01 32.96* 46.25 43.9 46.15 45.28 of the windows and land use (Table Forest N 2.22 1.97 1.85 2.21** 1.29 1.65* * C:N 20.75 16.72* 25.02 19.83* * 35.79 27.48* * 1). * Differences significant p<0.05 * Differences significant p<0.05 Conclusion In general the slowest decomposition is given in the land use of maize and the most rapid in the pastures, while in the site with major coverage (Lopez Mateos) the slowest rate of decomposition was registered. Though it is true that the quality of the fraction to foliate turned out to be important, it is necessary to correlate these results with the information of microclimate and fauna of the soil for every window and use of soil. Land use and litter quality (C and N) determines differences in decomposition rates, but it is not clear that vegetation cover Acknowledgements differences affect this ecosystem process. Irene Sánchez Gallén Sá Gallé Tropical Biology Station Los Tuxtlas, UNAM Tuxtlas, Laboratory of Fertility of Soils, Colegio de Posgraduados Soils, Mariel Ramírez and Alejandra Escamilla Ramí Dra. Isabelle Barois, Martín de los Santos and Dr. José Antonio García Barois, Martí José Garcí