1. A (Very) Brief History of
Learning Theory
Matthew D. Laliberte
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
NERCOMP SIG 01.19.05
2. Learning as a Black Box
INPUTS OUTCOMES
INPUTS OUTCOMES
Learning
So what’s happening inside the box?
3. A Superficial Review
Behaviorism
Cognitivism
Social Learning Theory
Social Constructivism
Multiple Intelligences
Brain-Based Learning
4. Behaviorism
Learning is defined by the outward
expression of new behaviors
Focuses solely on observable behaviors
A biological basis for learning
Learning is context-independent
Classical & Operant Conditioning
Reflexes (Pavlov’s Dogs)
Feedback/Reinforcement (Skinner’s Pigeon Box)
5. Behaviorism in the Classroom
Rewards and
punishments
Responsibility for
student learning
rests squarely
with the teacher
Lecture-based,
highly structured
6. Critiques of Behaviorism
Does not account for processes taking
place in the mind that cannot be observed
Advocates for passive student learning in a
teacher-centric environment
One size fits all
Knowledge itself is given and absolute
Programmed instruction & teacher-proofing
7. Cognitivism
Grew in response to Behaviorism
Knowledge is stored cognitively as symbols
Learning is the process of connecting
symbols in a meaningful & memorable way
Studies focused on the mental processes
that facilitate symbol connection
8. Cognitivism cont.
Jean Piaget
Genetic Epistemology
Assimilation and Accommodation
Jerome Bruner
Discovery Learning
Learner as independent problem-solver
9. Cognitivism in the Classroom
Inquiry-oriented
projects
Opportunities for the
testing of hypotheses
Curiosity encouraged
Staged scaffolding
10. Critiques of Cognitivism
Like Behaviorism, knowledge itself is given
and absolute
Input – Process – Output model is
mechanistic and deterministic
Does not account enough for individuality
Little emphasis on affective characteristics
11. Social Learning Theory (SLT)
Grew out of Cognitivism
A. Bandura (1973)
Learning takes place through observation
and sensorial experiences
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery
SLT is the basis of the movement against
violence in media & video games
Bobo Doll Experiment
12. SLT in the Classroom
Collaborative
learning and group
work
Modeling responses
and expectations
Opportunities to
observe experts in
action
13. Critiques of Social Learning Theory
Does not take into account individuality,
context, and experience as mediating
factors
Suggests students learn best as passive
receivers of sensory stimuli, as opposed to
being active learners
Emotions and motivation not considered
important or connected to learning
14. Social Constructivism
Grew out of and in response to Cognitivism,
framed around metacognition
Knowledge is actively constructed
Learning is…
A search for meaning by the learner
Contextualized
An inherently social activity
Dialogic and recursive
The responsibility of the learner
Lev Vygotsky
Social Learning
Zone of Proximal Development
15. Social Constructivism in the Classroom
Journaling
Experiential
activities
Personal focus
Collaborative &
cooperative learning
16. Critiques of Social Constructivism
Suggests that knowledge is neither given
nor absolute
Often seen as less rigorous than
traditional approaches to instruction
Does not fit well with traditional age
grouping and rigid terms/semesters
17. Multiple Intelligences (MI)
Grew out of Constructivism, framed around metacognition
H. Gardner (1983 to present)
All people are born with eight intelligences:
Enables students to leverage their strengths and purposefully target and develop their weaknesses
1. Verbal-Linguistic 5. Musical
2. Visual-Spatial 6. Naturalist
3. Logical-Mathematical 7. Interpersonal
4. Kinesthetic 8. Intrapersonal
18. MI in the Classroom
Delivery of
instruction via
multiple mediums
Student-centered
classroom
Authentic
Assessment
Self-directed
learning
19. Critiques of MI
Lack of quantifiable evidence that MI exist
Lack of evidence that use of MI as a
curricular and methodological approach
has any discernable impact on learning
Development process is a time-sink
Suggestive of a departure from core
curricula and standards
20. Brain-Based Learning (BBL)
Grew out of Neuroscience & Constructivism
D. Souza, N. Caine & G. Caine, E. Jensen
(1980’s to present)
12 governing principles
1. Brain is a parallel processor 7. Focused attention & peripheral perception
2. Whole body learning 8. Conscious & unconscious processes
3. A search for meaning 9. Several types of memory
4. Patterning 10. Embedded learning sticks
5. Emotions are critical 11. Challenge & threat
6. Processing of parts and wholes 12. Every brain is unique
21. BBL in the Classroom
Opportunities for group
learning
Regular environmental
changes
A multi-sensory
environment
Opportunities for self-
expression and making
personal connections to
content
Community-based
learning
22. Critiques of BBL
Research conducted by neuroscientists, not
teachers & educational researchers
Lack of understanding of the brain itself
makes “brain-based” learning questionable
Individual principles have been scientifically
questioned
23. Other Learning Theories of Note
Andragogy (M. Knowles)
Flow (M. Czikszentmihalyi)
Situated Learning (J. Lave)
Subsumption Theory (D. Ausubel)
Conditions of Learning (R. Gagne)
24. Learning as a Not-So-Black Box
Learner
INPUTS
INPUTS
INPUTS
INPUTS
INPUTS
Environment
OUTCOMES
OUTCOMES
OUTCOMES
Lost
Editor's Notes
#4:Biological basis for learning – you have it or you don’t…it’s a thing you inherit
#7:Grew in response to Behaviorism in an effort to better understand the mental processes behind learning
#8:Assimilation: The integration of new information into an existing symbol system
Accommodation: The adjustment of internal symbol systems to make space for new information that challenges the structure
#9:Staged scaffolding: not based on ability or experience…based on developmental stage (age most predominantly)
#10:Does not account enough for individuality and differences in staged development
Little emphasis on affective characteristics, especially motivation
#11:Imitation: Individuals adopt the modeled behavior more readily and completely if the person they are observing is admired by the observer
We more readily model behavior if it results in outcomes we value or approve of
#13:Think of a laboratory environment, for instance. What’s more effective in your estimation…watching the faculty member conduct the lab, or you doing it yourself?
#14:Knowledge is actively constructed by individuals in light of and in relation to our past experiences, the context of learning, personal motivation, and our beliefs/attitudes/prior knowledge
Think of the lab…instead of just watching it being done, the student acts as the active agent conducting the lab, with expert support leading them to the edge of their knowledge and beyond.
Dialogic: central focus is on written & spoken dialogue
Recursive: new learning is built upon prior learning…scaffolding
#16:Suggests that knowledge is neither given nor absolute, but is rather an individual construct
Does not fit well with traditional age grouping and rigid terms/semesters that do not provide a flexible timeframe for learning
#17:Metacognition – simply put is learning about learning, but more realistically, it’s about kn owing who you are as a learner, and developing the capacity to leverage your strengths to your advantage while purposefully addressing your weaknesses
#22:Individual principles have been scientifically questioned (left/right brain laterality)