SlideShare a Scribd company logo
INTRODUCTION TO
EUROPEAN POLITICS
Dr Simona Guerra
simona.guerra@nottingham.ac.uk
EU INSTITUTIONS
 WHAT
(The Council of Minister, The European Parliament, The
European Commission; and The Economic and Social Committee,
The Committee of the Regions and Local Authorities, The European
Court of Justice, The Court of Auditors)
 WHY
(Although EU MSs hold most of the decision making power,
the EU institutions can be compared with their governing
bodies, and we can study the EU ‘executive’, ‘legislative’ and
‘judicial’ functions)
 HOW
(Treaties & Theories; Unanimity/QMV; Consultation/Co-
operation/Co-Decision)
 WHEN
(Standstills and developments; Where next)
THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS
 Key decision making branch;
coordination of key EU policies
 Meeting place of national interests?
– compromise, bargaining and diplomacy
 Representatives of the EU MSs, COREPER, presidency for a six-month
period rotating on a fixed rota
 European Council: meeting of the HoSs of the MSs (relaunching of
Europe, The Hague, 1969)
(McCormick 2008: 69-93; Bache and George 2006: 229-259 and 276-293)
Meeting of European Union Ministers.
© Gryffindor and released into the public domain
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EU_Gymnich-
meeting_Bremen_March_2007_003.jpg
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
 Junior (and most
democratic) EU
institution?
(single chamber, 785 MEPs,
President in office for half of the legislature,
two-and-a-half year – renewable, role of the committees)
 ‘Unlike conventional legislatures’ ‘it cannot
introduce laws or raise revenues’ (EC)
(but ‘budgetary authority’, supervisory powers over the EU
institutions, vote on the college of Commissioners)
Hans-Gert Poettering.
© Image by ‫א‬ (Aleph)
http://commons.wikimedia.org
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hans-
Gert_Poettering_(2007).jpg
Licensed under
Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
• ‘Shares the power of amendment
and decision with the Council of
Minister’
(increasing powers from consultation procedure –
Rome, to cooperation procedure – SEA, and
codecision procedure – Maastricht)
• Is there a
democratic
deficit? (wk11)
http://www.europarl.europa.eu
41 European United Left
– Nordic Green Left
Social Group 215
Greens/European
Free Aliance 43
Independence/
Demoncracy 44
Alliance of Liberals and
Democrats for Europe 101
European People’s Party
(Christian Demoncrats) and
European Democrats
Union for Europe
of the Nations 44
Non-attached Members and
temporarily empty seats 29
Situation in March 2008
Political Groups in the European Parliament
(McCormick 2008: 69-93; Bache and George 2006: 229-259 and 294-315)
© Glentamara
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:European_P
arliament_political_groups_2_March_2008.svg
Released into public domain
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
 Executive- bureaucratic arm (27 members,
five-year term,
cabinets)
 Overseeing the execution
of laws and policies
(harmonisation of laws, regulation and standards; ‘big, expensive and
powerful’?; regulations, directives, decisions, recommendations and
opinions)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
 Core of EU integration, but reduced
autonomy (EP)?
http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm#
http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/index_en.htm
(McCormick 2008: 69-93; Bache and George 2006: 229-259 and 261-275)
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
 The ECJ meets in Luxembourg.
 The ECJ comprises 27 judges and 8 Advocates General.
 ‘The Judges and Advocates General are appointed by
common accord by the governments of the MSs for a
renewable term of 6 years’.
Courtroom at the European Court of Justice
© Stefan64
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sitzungssaal_EuGH.jpg
Released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
Unported Licence
THE EUROPEAN
COURT OF JUSTICE
 They ‘are chosen from among lawyers whose
independence is beyond doubt and who
possess the qualifications required for
appointment, in their respective countries, to the
highest judicial offices, …’.
 The ECJ ensures that ‘the law is observed in the
interpretation of the Treaties … and the
provisions …’
 Driver of integration? (Neofunct. vs. IG)
http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo1_6308/curia
(Bache and George 2006: 317-332)
HOW
(2002/358/EC: Council Decision of 25 April 2002 concerning the approval
… of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change …)
 ‘The Commission is formally the sole
institution with the right to propose legislation’
 Increasing democratic legitimacy of the EP
(and TEU IG pillars)
 Council (unanimously) can amend the
proposal
(Bache and George 2006: 229-259)
HOW
 Consultation (Commission to the Council; EP’s
opinion; still agr.; policy sectors such as asylum,
immigration, visas)
 Co-operation (SEA, EP’s second reading, proposing
amendments – QMV, ‘common position’)
 Co-Decision (Treaty of Amsterdam)
(Bache and George 2006: 229-259)
HOW
 Co-Decision - First stages as in the Co-operation procedure,
up to the ‘common position’
If the EP rejects the ‘common
position’/Council does not approve the EP’s
amendments: a Conciliation Committee (reps of the
Council and EP, EC as facilitator) is set up – ‘mutually
acceptable compromise text’ (6 wks, QMV for the Council
and simple majority voting for the EP)
If agreed – EP and Council have 6 wks to
adopt it (Council by qualified majority, EP absolute
majority)
If ‘either institution fails to adopt the text’
– the proposal ‘is dead’
(Bache and George 2006: 229-259; Hix 2005: 99-110)
HOW AND WHEN: TREATIES &
 Founding Treaties (Paris and Rome) - EC,
Council and EP, and consultative committees: ESC
 Single European Act (SEA) (1986, 1987) - Council –
legal recognition, extended QMV (internal market), EP (co-operation,
assent procedure) / Internal market; new policy ares to the EEC Treaty,
EPC – legal recognition)
 Treaty of the European Union (TEU) (Maastricht)
(1992, 1993) - Three pillars (EC pillar + 2 UG pillars) (consultative
committes: + CoR) EP (co-decision) / EMU – timetable, pillars two and
three – CFSP and JHA, new policy areas to the EEC Treaty)
HOW AND WHEN: TREATIES &
 Treaty of Amsterdam (1997, 1999) - Council -
Extended legal base of QMV, EP (extended co-decision), created
enhanced cooperation procedure / CFPS strengthened, much of
JHA to EC pillar, new policy areas to EC pillar
 Treaty of Nice (2001, 2003) - Change of nat. reps in
the institutions+Council: QMV system, extended legal base of
QMV, EP: small extension of co-decision, easier application of
cooperation procedure / marginal (JHA, EC)
(Bache and George 2006: 229-259; Nugent 2006: 129-146)
HOW AND WHEN: & THEORIES
 Neofunctionalism: concept of spillover
 Political spillover: European Commission as ‘the motor role’ mid-
1980s, extended QMC in the Council, ECJ
 Also, the EU as ‘a series of different regimes’ (transnational actors)
 Intergovernmentalism: IR realist tradition
 Council: national gov’ts are channelled by the Council, but simply
‘forum of hard bargaining’
 The European Commission (and other transnational actors) simply
respond to an agenda set by the govt’s (LIG, Moravcsik 1995)
Debate on the nature of the EU (supranational or intergovernmental)
and role of the European Commission (‘Servant’ or ‘Autonomous Actor’)
and Council?
(Bache and George 2006: 229-313, Nugent 2006: 558-567)
WHERE NEXT
EU 27 and The Treaty of Lisbon (wk 11)
 Rules on the QMV; Presidency (Council)
 Size of the European Commission (2/3 MSs)
and its appointment (majority vote of the Council, formally
appointed by the EP)
 Extended enhanced co-operation (QMV – 55% MSs,
65% pop., and 35% pop. as block min.)
 Extended co-decision (EP) – (enhanced coop. requires EP’s
approval)
 National Parliaments
 Police and Judicial Co-operation Pillar (ceased to be
an IG pillar)
(Bache and George 2006: 229-313
NEXT WEEK
From the history and theories, institutions
and policy-making to:
 Policy-making process:
Internal policies (CAP and Regional
Policy, EMU and Social Policy)
External policies (CFSP and Commercial
policy, Enlargement)

More Related Content

PDF
European union lecture 101
PPTX
02 the present eu institutional framework
PPTX
Hurrelmann-EU-History-and-Institutions-Nov.-2017.pptx
PPT
European institutions and bodies in force
PPTX
EU-History-and-Institution.pptx
PPT
basic eu lobbying - Corvinus University
PPTX
02 the present eu institutional framework
PPT
Basic EU lobbying
European union lecture 101
02 the present eu institutional framework
Hurrelmann-EU-History-and-Institutions-Nov.-2017.pptx
European institutions and bodies in force
EU-History-and-Institution.pptx
basic eu lobbying - Corvinus University
02 the present eu institutional framework
Basic EU lobbying

Similar to Lecture on EU Institutions including.ppt (20)

PPTX
Council of the european union
PPTX
EU Institutional Interplay 28/11/2014
PPTX
EUROPEAN UNION.pptx
PPTX
Posters Session EU: institutions and Budget 2014 15
PPTX
Eu for revision day (lessons 1 2)
PPTX
EU History, institutions and budget-Poster session
PPTX
Eu institutions
PPTX
European citizenship (handout)
DOCX
Instructions Your initial post should be at least 500 words T.docx
PPTX
The European Parliament
PPTX
The Lisbon treaty
PDF
GDPR EU Institutions and bodies.pdf
PPTX
European Union: Events from Treaty of Nice
PPT
European parliament
PPTX
01 european union law and politics
PPT
EU Insitutions Part II
PPTX
European law for AS
PPTX
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
PPT
EU institutions
PPT
Intoduction to EU lobbying
Council of the european union
EU Institutional Interplay 28/11/2014
EUROPEAN UNION.pptx
Posters Session EU: institutions and Budget 2014 15
Eu for revision day (lessons 1 2)
EU History, institutions and budget-Poster session
Eu institutions
European citizenship (handout)
Instructions Your initial post should be at least 500 words T.docx
The European Parliament
The Lisbon treaty
GDPR EU Institutions and bodies.pdf
European Union: Events from Treaty of Nice
European parliament
01 european union law and politics
EU Insitutions Part II
European law for AS
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
EU institutions
Intoduction to EU lobbying
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
PPT- ENG7_QUARTER1_LESSON1_WEEK1. IMAGERY -DESCRIPTIONS pptx.pptx
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PDF
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PPTX
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
PDF
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
PPTX
Introduction to Child Health Nursing – Unit I | Child Health Nursing I | B.Sc...
PDF
Abdominal Access Techniques with Prof. Dr. R K Mishra
PDF
Basic Mud Logging Guide for educational purpose
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
PPTX
Institutional Correction lecture only . . .
PDF
102 student loan defaulters named and shamed – Is someone you know on the list?
PDF
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
PPTX
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
PDF
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
PDF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
PDF
Pre independence Education in Inndia.pdf
PPT- ENG7_QUARTER1_LESSON1_WEEK1. IMAGERY -DESCRIPTIONS pptx.pptx
master seminar digital applications in india
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
Introduction to Child Health Nursing – Unit I | Child Health Nursing I | B.Sc...
Abdominal Access Techniques with Prof. Dr. R K Mishra
Basic Mud Logging Guide for educational purpose
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
Institutional Correction lecture only . . .
102 student loan defaulters named and shamed – Is someone you know on the list?
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
Pre independence Education in Inndia.pdf
Ad

Lecture on EU Institutions including.ppt

  • 1. INTRODUCTION TO EUROPEAN POLITICS Dr Simona Guerra simona.guerra@nottingham.ac.uk
  • 2. EU INSTITUTIONS  WHAT (The Council of Minister, The European Parliament, The European Commission; and The Economic and Social Committee, The Committee of the Regions and Local Authorities, The European Court of Justice, The Court of Auditors)  WHY (Although EU MSs hold most of the decision making power, the EU institutions can be compared with their governing bodies, and we can study the EU ‘executive’, ‘legislative’ and ‘judicial’ functions)  HOW (Treaties & Theories; Unanimity/QMV; Consultation/Co- operation/Co-Decision)  WHEN (Standstills and developments; Where next)
  • 3. THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS  Key decision making branch; coordination of key EU policies  Meeting place of national interests? – compromise, bargaining and diplomacy  Representatives of the EU MSs, COREPER, presidency for a six-month period rotating on a fixed rota  European Council: meeting of the HoSs of the MSs (relaunching of Europe, The Hague, 1969) (McCormick 2008: 69-93; Bache and George 2006: 229-259 and 276-293) Meeting of European Union Ministers. © Gryffindor and released into the public domain http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EU_Gymnich- meeting_Bremen_March_2007_003.jpg
  • 4. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT  Junior (and most democratic) EU institution? (single chamber, 785 MEPs, President in office for half of the legislature, two-and-a-half year – renewable, role of the committees)  ‘Unlike conventional legislatures’ ‘it cannot introduce laws or raise revenues’ (EC) (but ‘budgetary authority’, supervisory powers over the EU institutions, vote on the college of Commissioners) Hans-Gert Poettering. © Image by ‫א‬ (Aleph) http://commons.wikimedia.org http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hans- Gert_Poettering_(2007).jpg Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5
  • 5. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT • ‘Shares the power of amendment and decision with the Council of Minister’ (increasing powers from consultation procedure – Rome, to cooperation procedure – SEA, and codecision procedure – Maastricht) • Is there a democratic deficit? (wk11) http://www.europarl.europa.eu 41 European United Left – Nordic Green Left Social Group 215 Greens/European Free Aliance 43 Independence/ Demoncracy 44 Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe 101 European People’s Party (Christian Demoncrats) and European Democrats Union for Europe of the Nations 44 Non-attached Members and temporarily empty seats 29 Situation in March 2008 Political Groups in the European Parliament (McCormick 2008: 69-93; Bache and George 2006: 229-259 and 294-315) © Glentamara http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:European_P arliament_political_groups_2_March_2008.svg Released into public domain
  • 6. THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION  Executive- bureaucratic arm (27 members, five-year term, cabinets)  Overseeing the execution of laws and policies (harmonisation of laws, regulation and standards; ‘big, expensive and powerful’?; regulations, directives, decisions, recommendations and opinions)
  • 7. THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION  Core of EU integration, but reduced autonomy (EP)? http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm# http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/index_en.htm (McCormick 2008: 69-93; Bache and George 2006: 229-259 and 261-275)
  • 8. THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE  The ECJ meets in Luxembourg.  The ECJ comprises 27 judges and 8 Advocates General.  ‘The Judges and Advocates General are appointed by common accord by the governments of the MSs for a renewable term of 6 years’. Courtroom at the European Court of Justice © Stefan64 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sitzungssaal_EuGH.jpg Released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported Licence
  • 9. THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE  They ‘are chosen from among lawyers whose independence is beyond doubt and who possess the qualifications required for appointment, in their respective countries, to the highest judicial offices, …’.  The ECJ ensures that ‘the law is observed in the interpretation of the Treaties … and the provisions …’  Driver of integration? (Neofunct. vs. IG) http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo1_6308/curia (Bache and George 2006: 317-332)
  • 10. HOW (2002/358/EC: Council Decision of 25 April 2002 concerning the approval … of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change …)  ‘The Commission is formally the sole institution with the right to propose legislation’  Increasing democratic legitimacy of the EP (and TEU IG pillars)  Council (unanimously) can amend the proposal (Bache and George 2006: 229-259)
  • 11. HOW  Consultation (Commission to the Council; EP’s opinion; still agr.; policy sectors such as asylum, immigration, visas)  Co-operation (SEA, EP’s second reading, proposing amendments – QMV, ‘common position’)  Co-Decision (Treaty of Amsterdam) (Bache and George 2006: 229-259)
  • 12. HOW  Co-Decision - First stages as in the Co-operation procedure, up to the ‘common position’ If the EP rejects the ‘common position’/Council does not approve the EP’s amendments: a Conciliation Committee (reps of the Council and EP, EC as facilitator) is set up – ‘mutually acceptable compromise text’ (6 wks, QMV for the Council and simple majority voting for the EP) If agreed – EP and Council have 6 wks to adopt it (Council by qualified majority, EP absolute majority) If ‘either institution fails to adopt the text’ – the proposal ‘is dead’ (Bache and George 2006: 229-259; Hix 2005: 99-110)
  • 13. HOW AND WHEN: TREATIES &  Founding Treaties (Paris and Rome) - EC, Council and EP, and consultative committees: ESC  Single European Act (SEA) (1986, 1987) - Council – legal recognition, extended QMV (internal market), EP (co-operation, assent procedure) / Internal market; new policy ares to the EEC Treaty, EPC – legal recognition)  Treaty of the European Union (TEU) (Maastricht) (1992, 1993) - Three pillars (EC pillar + 2 UG pillars) (consultative committes: + CoR) EP (co-decision) / EMU – timetable, pillars two and three – CFSP and JHA, new policy areas to the EEC Treaty)
  • 14. HOW AND WHEN: TREATIES &  Treaty of Amsterdam (1997, 1999) - Council - Extended legal base of QMV, EP (extended co-decision), created enhanced cooperation procedure / CFPS strengthened, much of JHA to EC pillar, new policy areas to EC pillar  Treaty of Nice (2001, 2003) - Change of nat. reps in the institutions+Council: QMV system, extended legal base of QMV, EP: small extension of co-decision, easier application of cooperation procedure / marginal (JHA, EC) (Bache and George 2006: 229-259; Nugent 2006: 129-146)
  • 15. HOW AND WHEN: & THEORIES  Neofunctionalism: concept of spillover  Political spillover: European Commission as ‘the motor role’ mid- 1980s, extended QMC in the Council, ECJ  Also, the EU as ‘a series of different regimes’ (transnational actors)  Intergovernmentalism: IR realist tradition  Council: national gov’ts are channelled by the Council, but simply ‘forum of hard bargaining’  The European Commission (and other transnational actors) simply respond to an agenda set by the govt’s (LIG, Moravcsik 1995) Debate on the nature of the EU (supranational or intergovernmental) and role of the European Commission (‘Servant’ or ‘Autonomous Actor’) and Council? (Bache and George 2006: 229-313, Nugent 2006: 558-567)
  • 16. WHERE NEXT EU 27 and The Treaty of Lisbon (wk 11)  Rules on the QMV; Presidency (Council)  Size of the European Commission (2/3 MSs) and its appointment (majority vote of the Council, formally appointed by the EP)  Extended enhanced co-operation (QMV – 55% MSs, 65% pop., and 35% pop. as block min.)  Extended co-decision (EP) – (enhanced coop. requires EP’s approval)  National Parliaments  Police and Judicial Co-operation Pillar (ceased to be an IG pillar) (Bache and George 2006: 229-313
  • 17. NEXT WEEK From the history and theories, institutions and policy-making to:  Policy-making process: Internal policies (CAP and Regional Policy, EMU and Social Policy) External policies (CFSP and Commercial policy, Enlargement)