Accounting for Property, Plant and Equipment

Accounting for Property, Plant and
Equipment (Acquisition, Depreciation
and Revaluation)

Readings (BEFORE the lecture!)
 Additional resources (available on iLearn):
 AASB 116, AASB 123
Please note:
The lectures will not strictly follow these slides. It is expected and required
that you know the contents of the readings BEFORE the lecture. Consider
these slides as a summary and guideline for the lectures (and later for your
revision) where we will have more examples and discussions around the
topics.
Also, this week’s slides have blanks within certain examples. It is a good
exercise to try to fill the blanks BEFORE the lecture and compare your
attempts with the solutions discussed in the lecture.

Learning objectives
1.
2.
3.
4.
Understand the nature of property, plant and equipment (PPE);
understand the criteria for initial recognition of PPE;
understand how to measure PPE on initial recognition;
explain the alternative ways, in which PPE can be measured
subsequent to initial recognition;
understand the nature and calculation of depreciation;
explain the cost model of measurement;
explain the revaluation model of measurement;
understand the factors to consider when choosing which
measurement model to apply;
account for derecognition;
implement the disclosure requirements of AASB 116.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

 Conceptual framework: general principles about



definition,
recognition and
measurement
of assets and liabilities.
Now we look at specific accounting standards in
particular type of assets:
 relation to a
 property, plant and equipment (PPE) (AASB 116).
Including tax implications (AASB 112).

Overview AASB 116:
Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE)



Definition
Initial recognition of an asset
Subsequent measurement:
 Depreciation:
- allocating the depreciable amount of a non-current asset over the
asset’s expected useful life;
factors that must be considered in determining the useful life of a
depreciable asset;
various approaches (straight-line, sum-of-digits, declining balance,
production basis) for this allocation;
-
-


Cost Model
Revaluation Model


Derecognition
Disclosure requirements

The nature of PPE
 AASB 116 defines PPE as:



tangible items;
with a specific use within the entity;
that are expected to be used during
are non-current in nature).
more than one period (ie. they
 AASB 116 specifically excludes: also special rules
for investment
property –
AASB 140



assets held for sale – AASB 5
biological assets – AASB 141
mineral rights/reserves – AASB 6
 For some purposes, PPE is divided into classes, e.g.
 land, buildings, machinery, ships, aircraft, motor vehicles, furniture
and fixtures, office equipment.

Initial recognition of PPE
 Cost recognised as an asset if:
 it is probable that economic benefits
and
 the cost can be reliably measured.
will flow to the entity,
 Where future economic benefits are not expected to flow to the
entity, costs incurred should be expensed.
Component parts (with different useful lives) are required to be
separately accounted for:
 for example, an aircraft:
- the engine, frame and fittings of an aircraft are likely to have
different useful lives.


Initial measurement of PPE
 PPE is initially measured at cost, which includes:
 purchase price (at fair value);
 directly attributable costs required to bring the asset
location and condition necessary for it to operate;
to the
 borrowing costs (AASB 123);
 Initial estimate of costs of dismantling, removing the item or
restoring the site.
for example, an offshore oil platform
interest paid to finance acquisition, construction or production until ready for use,
if for a substantial period of time
more details on next slide
includes duties and taxes but excludes rebates and discounts

Directly attributable costs
 „Directly attributable costs‟
include
a) costs of employee benefits arising from
acquisition of the item of property, plant
costs of site preparation;
initial delivery and handling costs;
installation and assembly costs;
the construction or
and equipment;
b)
c)
d)
e) costs of testing whether asset is functioning properly, after
deducting the net proceeds from selling any items
produced while bringing the asset to that location and
condition (e.g. samples);
professional fees.f)

Measurement subsequent to initial
recognition
 AASB 116 allows a choice of two possible measurement models:
 cost model;
 revaluation model.
 Accounting policy choice of this decision based primarily on relevance
of information.
The policy that is chosen must be applied to a whole class of assets.
 May change policy, but only if it results in reliable and more relevant
information.
Under both models, PPE with a limited useful life need to be
depreciated.

Refer to section 7.6 of text for examples of what constitutes a class of assets
Each model will be discussed in detail
later

Depreciation – fundamentals
AASB 116 includes the following definitions:
 Depreciation:
 the systematic allocation of the depreciable amount
asset over its useful life.
Depreciable amount:
 the cost of an asset less its residual value (or other
of an

appropriate amounts substituted for cost – eg. fair value).
Residual value:
 the estimated value of the asset at the end of its useful life to
the entity.
Useful life:
 the period over which an asset is expected to be used by an
entity/the number of production (or similar) units expected to
be obtained by the entity.



Depreciation – fundamentals (cont‟d)
 Depreciation is an allocation process designed to reflect the
decline in the value of the asset in a pattern consistent with the
consumption of economic benefits by the entity.
AASB 116 does not specify how this allocation process should
be undertaken.
Various depreciation methods are used in practice. Common
methods are discussed on the following slides.


 Please note that depreciation applies to both the
revaluation model!
cost and the
In all cases, depreciation expense is
recognised with the following journal:
DR Depreciation expense
CR Accumulated depreciation

Depreciation – common methods
 Straight-line method:


assumption: asset used evenly throughout its life;
this method is appropriate when benefits to be derived from
the asset are expected to be evenly received throughout
asset’s useful life;
annual depreciation amount:
the

cost (or revalued amount)-residual (salvage) value
useful life


(cont‟d)
 Diminishing balance method:
 assumption: more benefits received in earlier years
life of asset;
of the
 depreciation expense is calculated on the asset’s opening
written-down value x depreciation rate;
written-down value:
- cost (or revalued amount) less accumulated depreciation;
depreciation rate:


residual value
1  useful life
cost or revalued amount

(cont‟d)
 Units of production method:
 based on expected use or output of asset;
 depreciation expense for the period is calculated as:
units produced in current period
 cost valueor revalued amt- residual
total expected production


(cont‟d)
 Sum-of-digits method:
 this method is appropriate where useful life might be related
more to production output than time and when economic
benefits expected to be derived are greater in the early
years than later years
depreciation expense:
- (cost - residual value) is multiplied by successively smaller
fractions to calculate depreciation expense;
numerator in fraction - changes each year, and is the years
remaining of the asset’s useful life at the beginning of the
period;
-
2nd- example for the year if useful life = 5 years:
(cost or revalued amtresidual value) 
4
15 (=1+ 2 + 3 + 4 + 5)

Depreciation – useful life
 Management should consider the following
estimating the useful life of an asset:
factors when




expected use;
physical wear and tear;
technical or commercial obsolescence;
legal or similar limits.


Useful life is subject to periodic review.
Land is not subject to depreciation as it does not
useful life.
have a limited

The cost model
 AASB 116 requires that
accumulated:
 depreciation;
 impairment losses.
assets are carried at cost less any
 Repair and maintenance costs are expensed
capitalised.
as incurred, not
 Capitalisation requires (at time of expenditure) increased
probable future economic benefit:
 for example, replacement of car engine.
discussed in week 6

The revaluation model - fundamentals
 As an alternative to the cost model AASB 116 allows the
revaluation model to be used for classes of assets.
 Revaluation: adjustment of PPE’s carrying amount so that
reflects its current fair value.
Measurement basis is fair value (FV).
Frequency of revaluations is not specified, but must be
performed with sufficient regularity such that the carrying
amount of assets is not materially different from their FV.
Revaluation performed on a class basis.
Accounting performed on an asset-by-asset basis.
it





The revaluation model – accounting on
an asset-by-asset basis
 A Ltd has decided to change from the cost model to
revaluation model to account for plant.
the
class of
assets
 At 30 June 2013 A Ltd owned the following plants:
ecrement)
 A revaluation increment will be recorded for Plant A
revaluation decrement will be recorded for Plant B.
and a
Cost
Accumulate
d
depreciation
Carrying
value
Fair value
Increment/(d
PlantA 200,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 50,000
Plant B 140,000 40,000 100,000 80,000 (20,000)
TOTAL 340,000 140,000 200,000 230,000 30,000

The revaluation model:
revaluation increments
 Increments are
 credited to equity: “asset revaluation
account;
through other comprehensive income
not part of profit/loss (P&L) for the year.
surplus” (ARS)


(OCI);
 The revaluation of plant A
Dr Accum. depreciation
would be recorded as follows:
100,000 *
Cr
Cr
Plant
Gain on revaluation
50,000 **
50,000 ***(OCI)
*** Amount of increment
** Cost - FV
(200,000 – 150,000) = 50,000
* Removal of existing
accumulated depreciation

revaluation increments (cont‟d)
 AASB 116 requires the tax effects of the revaluation to be considered
and the ARS account to be recognised net of the resulting tax effect.
This is achieved by debiting a special type of income tax expense as
part of other comprehensive income (OCI) and crediting a deferred tax
liability (DTL).
An upwards revaluation of an asset creates a taxable temporary
difference (TTD) leading to a deferred tax liability (DTL).
For plant A this would be calculated as:



CA – TB = TTD x 30% = DTL
150,000 – 100,000 = 50,000 x 30% = 15,000
Based on new FV of asset
Assumes that tax
and acct. depn. rates
are the same

revaluation increments (cont‟d)
 The tax effect for plant A would be recorded as follows:
15,000Dr Income Tax Expense (OCI)
Cr Deferred tax liability 15,000
 Combined entry:
Dr
Dr
Accum. depreciation
Income tax expense (OCI)
100,000
15,000
Cr
Cr
Cr
At year end
Plant
Deferred tax liability
Gain on revaluation (OCI)
the OCI accounts are closed
50,000
15,000
50,000
against the ARS:
50,000
15,000

Dr Gain on revaluation (OCI)
Cr
Cr
Asset revaluation surplus (ARS) 35,000

revaluation decrements
 The accounting treatment of a revaluation
follows:
 immediate recognition of an expense;
decrement is as
 no extra tax-effect entries beyond the tax-effect worksheet.
 The revaluation of Plant B would be recorded as follows:
Dr
Dr
Accum. depreciation 40,000
20,000
*
**
60,000***
Loss on revaluation (P&L)
Cr Plant
Please note: The loss on revaluation (P&L) leads to a temporary difference and deferred taxes
as well. However, since it is part of the accounting profit (P&L) we deal with it together with
all other differences between accounting profit and taxable income (see week 3 topic).
***Cost - FV
(140,000 – 80,000) = 60,000
**Amount of decrement*Removal of existing
accumulated depreciation

reversing previous increments
 A decrement reversing a previous increment
eliminates any ARS before recognising an expense.
 In relation
increment
to
of
plant B, assume that a gross revaluation
$10,000 had been made in 2011.

reversing previous increments (cont‟d)
 The revaluation of plant
follows:
B would be recorded as
Dr
Dr
Dr
Dr
Accum. depreciation
Loss on revaluation (OCI)
40,000
3,000
10,000
10,000
Cr
Cr
Income
Plant
tax expense (OCI) 3,000
60,000
Please note: Here again, the loss on revaluation (P&L) leads also to a temporary difference
and deferred taxes. We would deal with it together with all other differences
between accounting profit and taxable income. What would the journal entry
for this effect be?
Workings for journal
Gross decrement 20,000
Reversal of prev. increment (10,000) – tax effect 3,000
DR to P&L 10,000

reversing previous increments (cont‟d)
 At year end the OCI accounts are
ARS:
closed against
Dr
Dr
Asset revaluation surplus (ARS)
3,000
7,000
Cr Loss on revaluation (OCI) 10,000

reversing previous decrements
 An increment reversing a previous decrement is
recognised through profit/loss (P&L).
Any excess is recorded as other comprehensive
income (OCI) and increases ARS (net of related
effects).
In relation to plant A, assume that a revaluation
decrement of $15,000 had been made in 2011.

tax


The revaluation model: reversing
previous decrements (cont‟d)
 The revaluation of plant A would
follows:
be recorded as
Dr
Dr
Accum. depreciation
100,000
10,500
Cr
Cr
Cr
Cr
Plant
Gain on revaluation (P&L)
50,000
15,000
35,000
10,500
Please note: The P&L part of the gain on
revaluation is a reversal of a previous loss on
revaluation (P&L). It reverses also the
associated temporary difference and deferred
taxes when we account for differences between
accounting profit and taxable income.
Working for journal
Gross increment 50,000
Reversal prev. decrement (15,000) (P&L)
Gain on revaluation (OCI) 35,000
Less: tax effect (30%) (10,500)
CR to ARS 24,500

The revaluation model: reversing
previous decrements (cont‟d)
 At year end the OCI accounts are
ARS:
closed against
Dr Gain on revaluation (OCI) 35,000
Cr
Cr
Income tax expense (OCI) 10,500
24,500Asset revaluation surplus (ARS)

depreciation of revalued assets
 When an asset is revalued, the depreciation charge
to be recorded over the remaining useful life of the
asset is recalculated by reference to the fair value of
the asset.

comprehensive example
 On 30 June 2011 the statement of financial position of A LTD showed
the following non-current assets after charging depreciation:
Description $
Building 300,000
Accumulated depreciation - Building (100,000)
Plant 120,000
Accumulated depreciation - Plant (40,000)

comprehensive example (cont‟d)
 The company has adopted the revaluation model for the measurement
of all property, plant and equipment. This has resulted in the
recognition in previous periods of an asset revaluation surplus for the
building of $ 14,000. The plant consists of a machine purchased on the
1 July, 2010. On 30 June 2011, an independent valuer assessed the
fair value of the building to be $160,000 and the plant to be $ 90,000.
The income tax rate is 30%.
Required:
1. Prepare the journal entries to revalue the building and the plant as at
30 June 2011.
2. Assume that the building and plant had remaining useful lives of 5 years
and 4 years respectively, with zero residual value. Prepare the journal
entries to record depreciation expense for the year ended 30 June 2012
using the straight line method.


comprehensive example (cont‟d
)
1. 30/06/2011
Dr
Dr
Dr
Dr
Accumulated depreciation
Loss on revaluation (OCI)
– building 100 000
20 000
6 000
20 000
Cr
Cr
Building
6 000
140 000
Dr
Dr
6 000
14 000– building
Cr Loss on revaluation (OCI) 20 000
Please note: If we did the journal entry for the tax effect of the loss on revaluation
(P&L) right away it would look like
Dr DTA 6,000
Cr Income Tax expense 6,000

comprehensive example (cont‟d
)
1. 30/06/2011 (cont‟d)
Dr
Dr
Accumulated depreciation – plant
40 000
3 000
Cr
Cr
Cr
Plant
30 000
10 000
3 000
Dr Gain on revaluation (OCI) 10 000
Cr
Cr
3
7
000
000– plant

comprehensive example (cont‟d)
2. 30/06/2012
Dr Depreciation expense – building 32 000
Cr Accumulated depreciation
($160 000/5)
– building 32 000
Dr Depreciation expense – plant 22 500
Cr Accumulated depreciation – plant 22 500
($90 000/ 4)

transfers from ARS
 Transfers may be made from the ARS in the following
circumstances:
 When a revalued asset is derecognised (ie scrapped or
sold) → the balance in the ARS may be transferred to
retained earnings.
 When a revalued asset is being depreciated → the ARS
may be progressively transferred to retained earnings over
the useful life of the asset.
Bonus share issues may be made from the ARS
DR ARS
CR Share capital
DR ARS
CR Retained earnings

Choosing between the models
 There is a cost disincentive to adopt the revaluation
model (Australian experience).
Cost model harmonises with U.S. GAAP.
 Revaluation
reliability.
model provides increased relevance &

Accounting for gains/losses from
derecognition
 Note: Assets classified ‘held for sale’ are treated according to AASB 5
→ the following applies only to PPE which has not been classified as
‘held for sale’.
Gain or loss from derecognition of an item of property, plant and
equipment is to be calculated as the difference between (AASB 116):
 net disposal proceeds (if any); and
 the asset’s carrying amount.
Derecognition
 the point in time when an asset is removed from the statement of financial
position (balance sheet):


-
-
when an asset is sold; or
when no future economic benefits are expected from an asset’s use or
disposal.

derecognition (cont‟d)
 Example:



A Ltd acquired a machine on 1 July 2007 for $50,000;
Useful life = 4 years; residual value = $10,000;
On 1 July 2009 the machine was sold for $45,000.
 The journal entries to account for the sale are:
Dr Cash
Cr
45,000
45,000Proceeds on sale
Dr
Dr
Carrying amount of asset
Accumulated depreciation
Cr Machine
30,000
20,000
50,000
It is common to
show this gain on
sale net in the
income statement
$45,000 - $30,000 = $15,000The gain on sale is

derecognition (cont‟d)
 When an revalued asset is sold, any resulting
balance in the revaluation surplus (AASB 116)


may be transferred directly to retained earnings;
cannot be transferred to profit/loss (i.e. the so-called
‘recycling’ is not allowed);
hence, for non-current assets under the revaluation
model any gain on sale shown in profit/loss will be less
than for assets under the cost model.


Disclosure requirements
 For each class of property, plant and equipment the
following must be disclosed (AASB 116):




measurement basis used for gross carrying amount;
depreciation methods used;
useful lives or depreciation rates used;
gross carrying amount and accumulated depreciation
at beginning and end of period;
reconciliation of carrying amount at beginning and end
of period.


Disclosure requirements (cont‟d)
 The required disclosures regarding asset revaluations
(AASB 116) are:




effective date of revaluation;
whether an independent valuer was involved;
methods and assumptions applied;
extent to which fair values were determined, with reference to
observable prices in active markets or recent market transactions;
for each revalued class, the carrying amount if the cost model was
used;
the revaluation surplus, indicating the change for the period and
any restrictions on distribution of the balance to shareholders.



For more details on Assignment Help/ Homework Help/ Online Tuitions
visit our website at
http://www.helpwithassignment.com
Thank You

Accounting for Property, Plant and Equipment

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (14)

Similar to Accounting for Property, Plant and Equipment (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Accounting for Property, Plant and Equipment