M learning in construction2
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes204 views
This implementation plan outlines strategies to improve attendance, retention, collaboration, and the relevance of course material for a construction program. It proposes increasing site observations linked to theory, using mobile learning technologies, developing ePortfolios, and ensuring activities meet unit standards and remain relevant to students' future work environments to engage students and address typical challenges in the field.
M learning in construction2
- 1. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN BY TINA BOOTH 2013
- 3. in all other courses
- 4. in all other courses DIFFICULTIES
- 7. Collaboration - Peer support
- 8. Site observation linked to theory
Editor's Notes
- #3: Construction has been described using the following terms. –Not all great (click)Like to change this to..(click)
- #4: Construction is a core subjectWide reaching implications(Click)Wide reaching benefits when organised well(click)
- #5: Construction is a core subjectWide reaching implications(Click)Wide reaching benefits when organised well(click)
- #6: 3 objectives1st motivating/engaging students..help with rentention(click)2ndfosting collaboration/peer support. Construction is not easy, collaboration may assist here(click)3rd students are required to visit a site/watch construction as well as learn theoryCurrently limited links between theory/site(Click)
- #7: 3 objectives1st motivating/engaging students..help with rentention(click)2ndfosting collaboration/peer support. Construction is not easy, collaboration may assist here(click)3rd students are required to visit a site/watch construction as well as learn theoryCurrently limited links between theory/site(Click)
- #8: 3 objectives1st motivating/engaging students..help with rentention(click)2ndfosting collaboration/peer support. Construction is not easy, collaboration may assist here(click)3rd students are required to visit a site/watch construction as well as learn theoryCurrently limited links between theory/site(Click)
- #9: 3 objectives1st motivating/engaging students..help with rentention(click)2ndfosting collaboration/peer support. Construction is not easy, collaboration may assist here(click)3rd students are required to visit a site/watch construction as well as learn theoryCurrently limited links between theory/site(Click)
- #10: Or data, or access to internet, or video, Some tasks will be group based to minimise issues(Click)
- #11: RecapSocial media, for fun, and connection, collaboration etc(click)Photos/video for linking site to theory and analysis(click)QR codes for enquiry, context(click) Geo-Location for community, sharing, interestProblem is without something holding all this together (click)–they could all be seen as gimicks. (click)
- #12: Therefore examining weaknesses start with a byod device. Variety of devices/capabilities etc among users(click)Unit standards (pass/incomplete) result, difficult to manage participation- cant “require” it, So we need some other kind of (Click) Motivator, strong one(click) that has relevance to the tasks (click) which brings us back to the byod, but it must have relevance or it’s just relying on (Click) the cool factor and we will loose credibility and motivation.(click) Relevance I struggled with, I needed something to tie it all together,(click) e-portfolio (summative assessment task) where all the apps are used in completion of the e-portfolio then we have a valid and motivating relevance.
- #13: Conclusion:The objectives were to use mLearning to improve:Retention, collaboration and relevanceAll in an effort to improve the course as a whole and have an indirect impact across the diploma.But I found without embedding their purpose within something bigger and more importantIt was possible the use would not be credible (no point/ why bother) especially within unit standard frameworkEmbedding tasks into e-portfolio (summative assessment) mlearning tasks now have purpose and interest.