![both of which have limits, and it suffers three major weaknesses
you need to be aware of and avoid:
· Overreliance on hindsight. Common sense works best in well-
known or stable situations with predictable outcomes—what
worked before should work again. But modern business
situations are complex and uncertain and require adapting to
change. Common sense is especially weak in responding to the
unknown or unexpected. And because it focuses on the past,
common sense lacks vision for the future.
· Lack of rigor. People comfortable with common-sense
responses may not apply the effort required to appropriately
analyze and solve problems. If you lack rigor, then you are
unlikely to define the problem accurately, identify the true
causes, or recommend the right courses of action.
· Lack of objectivity. Common sense can be overly subjective
and lack a basis in science. In such cases we are not always able
to explain or justify our reasoning to others, which is a sign that
common sense lacks objectivity.
In BusinessNewsDaily, Microsoft researcher Duncan Watts says
we love common sense because we prefer narrative: “You have
a story that sounds right and there’s nothing toPage 8 contradict
it.” Watts contrasts a more effective, scientific approach in his
book Everything Is Obvious Once You Know the Answer: How
Common Sense Fails Us. “The difference [in a scientific
approach] is we test the stories and modify them when they
don’t work,” he says. “Storytelling is a useful starting point.
The real question is what we do next.”10
OB is a scientific means for overcoming the limits and
weaknesses of common sense. The contingency approach in OB
means you don’t settle for options based simply on experience
or common practice if another solution may be more effective.
Thus the goal of OB is to give you more than common sense and
thus enhance your understanding of situations at work and guide
your behaviors. This in turn will make you more attractive to
potential employers and more effective once hired. Let’s
explore this idea in more detail, beginning with the importance](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/makingobworkformewhatisobandwhyisitimportantth-221028224517-8ce4aa63/85/MAKING-OB-WORK-FOR-MEWhat-Is-OB-and-Why-Is-It-ImportantTH-docx-3-320.jpg)
MAKING OB WORK FOR MEWhat Is OB and Why Is It ImportantTH.docx
- 1. MAKING OB WORK FOR ME What Is OB and Why Is It Important? THE VALUE OF OB TO MY JOB AND CAREER The termorganizational behavior (OB)describes an interdisciplinary field dedicated to understanding and managing people at work. To achieve this goal, OB draws on research and practice from many disciplines, including: · Anthropology · Economics · Ethics · Management · Organizational theory · Political science · Psychology · Sociology · Statistics · Vocational counseling How OB Fits into My Curriculum and Influences My SuccessA Contingency Perspective—The Contemporary Foundation of OB Acontingency approachcalls for using the OB concepts and tools that best suit the situation, instead of trying to rely on “one best way.” This means there is no single best way to manage people, teams, or organizations. A particular management practice that worked today may not work tomorrow. What worked with one employee may not work with another. The best or most effective course of action instead depends on the situation. Thus, to be effective you need to do what is appropriate given the situation, rather than adhering to hard-and-fast rules or defaulting to personal preferences or organizational
- 2. norms. Organizational behavior specialists, and many effective managers, embrace the contingency approach because it helps them consider the many factors that influence the behavior and performance of individuals, groups, and organizations. Taking a broader, contingent perspective like this is a fundamental key to your success in the short and the long term.How Self-Awareness Can Help You Build a Fulfilling Career The Stanford Graduate School of Business asked the members of its Advisory Council which skills are most important for their MBA students to learn. The most frequent answer was self-awareness.6 The implication is that to have a successful career you need to know who you are, what you want, and how others perceive you. Larry Bossidy (former CEO of Honeywell) and Ram Charan (world-renowned management expert) said it best in their book Execution: “When you know yourself, you are comfortable with your strengths and not crippled by your shortcomings. … Self-awareness gives you the capacity to learnPage 6 from your mistakes as well as your successes. It enables you to keep growing.”9 They also argue that you need to know yourself in order to be authentic—real and not fake, the same on the outside as the inside. Authenticity is essential to influencing others, which we discuss in detail in Chapter 12. People don’t trust fakes, and it is difficult to influence or manage others if they don’t trust you. As professors, consultants, and authors, we couldn’t agree more! To help you increase your self-awareness we include multiple Self-Assessments in every chapter. These are an excellent way to learn about yourself and see how OB can be applied at school, at work, and in your personal life. Go to Connect, complete the assessments, and then answer the questions included in each of the Self-Assessment boxes.Uncommon Sense Let’s return to common sense. At first glance the contingency perspective may look like simple common sense. But it’s different. Common sense is often based on experience or logic,
- 3. both of which have limits, and it suffers three major weaknesses you need to be aware of and avoid: · Overreliance on hindsight. Common sense works best in well- known or stable situations with predictable outcomes—what worked before should work again. But modern business situations are complex and uncertain and require adapting to change. Common sense is especially weak in responding to the unknown or unexpected. And because it focuses on the past, common sense lacks vision for the future. · Lack of rigor. People comfortable with common-sense responses may not apply the effort required to appropriately analyze and solve problems. If you lack rigor, then you are unlikely to define the problem accurately, identify the true causes, or recommend the right courses of action. · Lack of objectivity. Common sense can be overly subjective and lack a basis in science. In such cases we are not always able to explain or justify our reasoning to others, which is a sign that common sense lacks objectivity. In BusinessNewsDaily, Microsoft researcher Duncan Watts says we love common sense because we prefer narrative: “You have a story that sounds right and there’s nothing toPage 8 contradict it.” Watts contrasts a more effective, scientific approach in his book Everything Is Obvious Once You Know the Answer: How Common Sense Fails Us. “The difference [in a scientific approach] is we test the stories and modify them when they don’t work,” he says. “Storytelling is a useful starting point. The real question is what we do next.”10 OB is a scientific means for overcoming the limits and weaknesses of common sense. The contingency approach in OB means you don’t settle for options based simply on experience or common practice if another solution may be more effective. Thus the goal of OB is to give you more than common sense and thus enhance your understanding of situations at work and guide your behaviors. This in turn will make you more attractive to potential employers and more effective once hired. Let’s explore this idea in more detail, beginning with the importance
- 4. of possessing and developing both hard and soft skills. Employers Want Both Hard and Soft Skills · Hard skillsare the technical expertise and knowledge required to do a particular task or job function, such as financial analysis, accounting, or operations. · Soft skillsrelate to human interactions and include both interpersonal skills and personal attributes. How OB Fits into My Career What It Takes to Get Hired What It Takes to Get Promoted Performance Gives Me Credibility Performance matters because it gives you credibility with your peers and those you may manage. Just be aware that early in your career your bosses will be looking for more. They will evaluate your management potential, and their opinion will affect your opportunities. So even in a line (nonmanagement) position, you need to know how to: · Apply different motivational tools (Chapter 5). · Provide constructive feedback (Chapter 6). · Develop and lead productive teams (Chapters 8 and 13). · Understand and manage organizational culture and change (Chapters 14 and 16). RIGHT VS. WRONG—ETHICS AND MY PERFORMANCE Ethicsguides behavior by identifying right, wrong, and the many shades of gray in between. Ethics also gets priority because many OB topics have a direct and substantial influence on the conduct of individuals and organizations. Notably, reward systems (Chapter 6), decision making (Chapter 11), leader behavior (Chapter 13), and
- 5. organizational culture (Chapter 14) all can powerfully call upon our ethical standards at work. Cheating The news now routinely reports about cheating in sports, such as alleged match-fixing by a number of professional tennis players and scores of instances of the use of performance- enhancing drugs: the Russian Olympic team’s systematic use and cover-up, cyclist Lance Armstrong’s public confession of drug use during each of his Tour de France victories (legal charges were ultimately filed), and Major League Baseball’s lifetime ban of pitcher Jenrry Mejia for three separate steroid violations. But cheating occurs in every other area of our lives too. In early 2016, tennis star Maria Sharapova (left photo) tested positive for a performance-enhancing drug. She quickly admitted to the finding and apologized. Sepp Blatter (right photo), former president of soccer's international governing body FIFA, was at the heart of a scandal that rocked the organization, cost Blatter and others their jobs, and led to formal investigations across the globe. Investigators uncovered a well-entrenched and long-lasting pattern of bribes and other financial misconduct. (Left) © Damian Dovarganes/AP Photo; (right) © Valeriano Di Domenico/AFP/Getty Images What about cheating at school? Anonymous surveys by the Josephson Institute of more than 23,000 students at private and public high schools across the United States found 59 percent admitted cheating on a test in the past academic year, and 32 percent reported plagiarizing material found on the Internet.22 Fifty-seven percent of participating high school students agreed with the statement “In the real world, successful people do what they have to do to win, even if others consider it cheating.”23
- 6. Page 13The story doesn’t get any better in college. Turnitin.com, the plagiarism-checking service, reported finding 156 million matches between college student papers and previously published Internet material. The two top sources? Wikipedia and Yahoo Answers. As an example, 125 of 279 members of a particular government class at Harvard University were suspected of cheating on a take-home final.24 These are just a few examples and statistics of a very long list. What percentage of students at your school do you think cheat on homework assignments? Exams? Take-home finals? Ethical Lapses—Legality, Frequency, Causes, and Solution s The vast majority of managers mean to run ethical organizations, yet corporate corruption is widespread.27 Some of the executives whose unethical behavior bankrupted the organizations they led, destroyed the lives of many employees, and caused enormous losses for employees, investors, and customers in the last few decades are Michael Milken (Drexel Burnham Lambert, 1990), Kenneth Lay and Jeff Skilling (Enron, 2001), Bernie Ebbers (WorldCom, 2002), Bernie Madoff (Madoff Investment Securities LLC, 2009), Hisao Tanaka (Toshiba, 2015), and Sepp Blatter (FIFA, 2015). None of these leaders acted alone.
- 7. Unethical Does Not Mean Illegal While extreme examples of unethical and illegal conduct make headlines, they are the exception. The truth is that very few unethical acts are also illegal, most are not punished in any way, and even if illegal, few are prosecuted. This means you should not rely on the legal system to manage or assure ethical conduct at work. For instance, FoxConn, Apple Computer’s top supplier in China, was in the spotlight for its highly publicized ill-treatment of 1.2 million Chinese employees, who suffered 14-hour workdays, six- to seven-day workweeks, low wages, and retaliation for protesting.28 American Airlines pilots provided another example in 2012 when they created widespread slowdowns in flights to pressure the company in negotiations with their union. American’s on- time performance dropped from 80 percent to 48 percent, versus 77 percent for Southwest and 69 percent for Delta. The slowdowns resulted in enormous costs and inconveniences for thousands of customers.29 None of the conduct in these examples was illegal. The following OB in Action box provides another notable instance of how widespread unethical behavior has resulted in virtually no legal consequences Why Ethics Matters to Me and My Employer Criminal or not, unethical behavior negatively affects not only the offending employee but also his or her coworkers and
- 8. employer. Unethical behavior by your coworkers, including company executives, can make you look bad and tarnish your career. Thankfully, research provides us with clear ways to avoid such problems: … sustainable businesses are led by CEOs who take a people- centered, inclusive approach rather than a controlling, target- driven one. They are people who listen, who foster cultures in which employees are not scared to point out problems and in which staff feel they have a personal responsibility to enact corporate values, be they health and safety concerns or putting the client’s interests first.35Ethical Dilemmas Ethical dilemmas are situations with two choices, neither of which resolves the situation in an ethically acceptable manner. Such situations surround us at work and school. They highlight the fact that choosing among available options is not always a choice between right and wrong. Because such dilemmas are so frequent and potentially consequential, we include an Ethical/Legal Challenge feature at the end of each chapter that asks you to consider what you might do if confronted with difficult ethical choices at work. What Causes Unethical Behavior? What about Unethical Behavior in College and When Applying
- 9. for Jobs? A study of graduate students in the United States and Canada, including MBAs, found that peer behavior was by far the strongest predictor of student cheating, followed by severity of penalties and certainty of being reported.43 Students are more likely to cheat if their classmates cheat, and/or they think the probability of being caught is small, and if caught that the penalties will not be severe. However, don’t be too quick to blame this bad behavior on your lying, cheating classmates. The same researchers acknowledge that there are many other potential reasons for cheating, such as perceived unfairness in grading. It also is possible that students see different degrees of cheating—for instance, in homework assignments versus on exams. As for job hunting, an analysis of 2.6 million job applicant background checks by ADP Screening and Selection Services revealed that “44 percent of applicants lied about their work histories, 41 percent lied about their education, and 23 percent falsified credentials or licenses.”44Figure 1.2 highlights some of the most common and most outrageous lies told on résumés. Can you imagine being a recruiter? If you believe these numbers, half the people you interview could be lying to you about something! Many Page 19potential reasons for unethical behavior at work exist, beyond those listed in Table 1.2, such as:
- 10. 1. Personal motivation to perform (“I must be No. 1”). 2. Pressure from a supervisor to reach unrealistic performance goals along with threats for underperforming. 3. Reward systems that honor unethical behavior. 4. Employees’ perception of little or no consequences for crossing the line.45 What Can I Do about It? Like most others, you have or likely will witness questionable or even blatantly unethical conduct at work. You might be tempted to think, This is common practice, the incident is minor, it’s not my responsibility to confront such issues, and loyal workers don’t confront each other. While such rationalizations for not confronting unethical conduct are common, they have consequences for individuals, groups, and organizations. What can you do instead? Here are a few suggestions: 1. Recognize that it’s business and treat it that way. Ethical issues are business issues, just like costs, revenues, and employee development. Collect data and present a convincing case against the unethical conduct just as you would to develop a new product or strategy. 2. Accept that confronting ethical concerns is part of your job. Whether it is explicit in your job description or not, ethics is everybody’s job. If you think something is
- 11. questionable, take action. 3. Challenge the rationale. Many lapses occur despite policies against them. If this is the case, ask, “If what you did is common practice or OK, then why do we have a policy forbidding it?” Alternatively, and no matter the rationale, you can ask, “Would you be willing to explain what you did and why in a meeting with our superiors or customers, or during an interview on the evening news?” 4. Page 20Use your lack of seniority or status as an asset. While many employees rely on their junior status to avoid confronting ethical issues, being junior can instead be an advantage. It enables you to raise issues by saying, “Because I’m new, I may have misunderstood something, but it seems to me that what you’ve done is out of bounds or could cause problems.” 5. Consider and explain long-term consequences. Many ethical issues are driven by temptations and benefits that play out in the short term. Frame and explain your views in terms of long- term consequences. 6. Suggest solutions—not just complaints. When confronting an issue, you will likely be perceived as more helpful and be taken more seriously if you provide an alternate course or solution. Doing so will also make it more difficult for the offender to disregard your complaint.46 What Role Do Business Schools Play? The researchers asked this question and found that the gender
- 12. and academic background of deans, along with whether the school was public or private, predicted the likelihood that ethics courses were required. Female deans with a background in management were most likely to require ethics courses, while men with economics and finance backgrounds were least likely. Private and religiously affiliated schools were more likely than public schools to require classes in ethics.48 What is the case at your school? Does it align with these findings? APPLYING OB TO SOLVING PROBLEMS We all encounter problems in our lives. Aproblemis a difference or gap between an actual and a desired state or outcome. Problems arise when our goals (desired outcomes) are not being met (actual situation). So it is important to carefully consider what your goal or desired outcome is in order to define the problem appropriately. In turn, problem solvingis a systematic process for closing these gaps. A 3-Step ApproachBasics of the 3-Step Approach Here are the three steps in our applied approach to problem solving. 1. Step 1: Define the problem. Most people identify problems reactively—after they happen—which causes them to make snap judgments or assumptions, often plagued by common sense, that incorrectly define the problem and its causes and solutions. All
- 13. of us would likely benefit from Albert Einstein’s comment, “If I were given one hour to save the planet, I would spend 59 minutes defining the problem and one minute resolving it.” Let’s take Professor Einstein’s advice. The following tip will serve you well when defining problems throughout this course and your professional life. · Define problems in terms of desired outcomes. Then test each one by asking, “Why is this a problem?” Define problems in terms of desired outcomes or end states—compare what you want to what you have. Resist the urge to assume or infer you “know” what the problem and underlying causes are. Instead, start with available facts or details. Then ask yourself, “Why is this gap a problem?” For example, suppose you are disengaged from your work. How do you know this? What is the evidence? Perhaps you no longer go out of your way to help your coworkers and you stop responding to e-mails after work hours. You’ve defined your problem using evidence (or data). Now ask, “Why is this a problem?” Because when you are engaged, your coworkers benefit from you sharing your knowledge and experience. Coworkers and customers benefit from your responsiveness and willingness to respond to e-mails on their time line, even when it isn’t necessarily convenient for you (after hours). 2. Step 2: Identify potential causes using OB concepts and theories. Essential to effective problem solving, regardless of
- 14. your approach, is identifying the appropriate causes. So far you have OB concepts like the contingency perspective and ethics— and many more are coming—to use as potential causes. The more options you have to choose from, the more likely you will identify the appropriate cause(s) and recommendation(s). To improve your ability to accurately identify potential causes, we provide the following tip for Step 2. · Test your causes by asking, “Why or how does this cause the problem?” Once you have confidently defined the problem in Step 1—disengagement—you need to identify potential causes (Step 2). Ask, “Why am I disengaged?” One common reason, backed by science, is that you perceive you were evaluated unfairly in your recent performance review. “Why or how did this cause disengagement?” Because if you feel unappreciated for what you’ve done, you are not motivated to go the extra mile to help your coworkers or customers. Asking “why” multiple times and following the line of reasoning will lead you to define and identify problems and causes more accurately. 3. Step 3:Make recommendations and (if appropriate) take action. In some workplace situations you will make recommendations, and in others you will also implement the recommendations. Here is a simple suggestion to improve the quality of your recommendations and overall problem solving. How This Problem-Solving Approach Develops Throughout the Book
- 15. Tools to Reinforce My Problem-Solving Skills STRUCTURE AND RIGOR IN SOLVING PROBLEMS The Person–Situation Distinction Person factorsare the infinite characteristics that give individuals their unique identities. These characteristics combine to influence every aspect of your life. In your job and career, they affect your goals and aspirations, the plans you make to achieve them, the way you execute such plans, and your ultimate level of achievement. Part One of this book is devoted to person factors. Situation factorsare all the elements outside ourselves that influence what we do, the way we do it, and the ultimate results of our actions. A potentially infinite number of situation factors can either help or hinder you when you are trying to accomplish something (see the following Problem-Solving Application box). This is why situation factors are critically important to OB and your performance. Parts Two and Three of this book are devoted to situation factors.Which Influences Behavior and Performance More—Person or Situation Factors? People and Situations Are Dynamic People change, situations change, and the two change each other. To illustrate: · People bring their abilities, goals, and experiences to each and
- 16. every situation, which often changes the situation. · Conversely, because situations have unique characteristics, such as opportunities and rewards, they change people. What you value in a job will likely differ between now and the time you are trying to make a move to senior management. · It also is true that the current job market and employer expectations differ from those at the height of the technology bubble in the late 1990s or in the depths of the Great Recession in 2007–2009. In the first scenario employees changed, and in the second the situation or environment changed. · Finally, your manager—a situation factor—can change what you do, the way you do it, and your effectiveness. You can exert the same influence on your manager. The bottom-line implication for OB and your work life is that knowledge of one type of factor without the other is insufficient. You need to understand the interplay between both person and situation factors to be an effective employee and manager.How Does the Person–Situation Distinction Help Me Apply OB Knowledge? Many companies restructure indiscriminately and cut large percentages from their employee ranks. Assume you and five coworkers, who all do the same job, are downsized. You all experience the same event, but your reactions will vary. For instance, you might not feel too bad if you didn’t like the job
- 17. and were considering going to graduate school anyway. Two of your coworkers, however, may be devastated and depressed. Nevertheless, because the downsizing event was the same for all of you (the situation factors were identical), we can assume that the differences in everyone’s reactions were due to things about you as individuals (person factors), such as other job opportunities, how much each of you likes the job you just lost, your ratio of savings to debt, and whether you have kids, mortgages, or a working spouse. The person–situation distinction, therefore, provides a means for classifying OB concepts and theories into causes of behavior and problems. Page 27 Levels—Individual, Group/Team, and Organization We saw above that OB distinguishes among three levels at work: individual, group/team, and organizational. To illustrate how considering levels helps in solving real-world problems, think about the many reasons people quit their jobs. · Some people quit because their job doesn’t fulfill what they value, such as challenging and stimulating work (an individual- level input). · Others quit because of conflicts with their boss or because they have nothing in common with their coworkers (a group/team-level process). · A common reason people quit is a faulty reward system that
- 18. unfairly distributes raises, bonuses, and recognition (an organizational-level process). Understanding and considering levels increases your problem- solving effectiveness and performance. This is highlighted in the problem-solving example in Section 1.6. Applying OB Concepts to Identify the Right Problem Nothing causes more harm than solving the wrong problem. To illustrate, assume that many people in your department at work are quitting. What could be the reason? The person–situation distinction allows you to consider unique individual factors as well as situation factors that might be the source of the problem. And considering the levels of individual, group, and organization will allow you to look at each for possible causes. For example: · Person factors. Do your departing coworkers have something in common? Is there anything about their personalities that makes work difficult for them, such as a preference to work collaboratively rather than independently? What about their ages? Gender? Skills? · Situation factors. Have there been changes in the job market, such as a sudden increase in employment opportunities at better wages? Have working conditions such as promotion opportunities become less attractive in your organization? · Individual level. Has the job itself become boring and less
- 19. meaningful or rewarding to the employees who quit? · Group/team level. Have there been any changes to the work group, including the manager, that might make work less satisfying? How does turnover in your department compare to that in other departments in the organization? Why? · Organizational level. Has the organization changed ownership, or rewritten company policies, or restructured such that the most desirable positions are now at the headquarters in another state? By following this approach and asking these questions, you widen your focus and review a larger number of possible causes, increasing the likelihood you will identify the right problem. If you don’t quite follow this example, then have no fear. We analyze a turnover scenario in the last section of this chapter and provide a more detailed application. Stay tuned! THE ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING AND APPLYING OB A Basic Version of the Organizing Framework The foundation of the Organizing Framework is a systems model wherein inputs influence outcomes through processes. The person and situation factors are inputs. We’ve organized processes and outcomes into the three levels of OB—individual,
- 20. group/team, and organizational. This framework implies that person and situation factors are the initial drivers of all outcomes that managers want to achieve. This is the case because inputs affect processes, and processes affect outcomes. And because events are dynamic and ongoing, many outcomes will in turn affect inputs and processes. See Figure 1.3. The relationships Page 29between outcomes at one point in time and inputs and processes at another are shown as feedback loops in the Organizing Framework (the black arrows at the bottom of the figure). Using the Organizing Framework for Problem Solving You can use the Organizing Framework at all three steps of the problem-solving process to add rigor, intelligently apply your OB knowledge, and in turn improve your performance. 1. Step 1: Define the problem. Problems can be defined in terms of outcomes in the Organizing Framework, and these outcomes occur at three levels. 2. Step 2: Identify causes. Causes are often best thought of in terms of inputs (person or situation) or processes at various levels (individual, group/team, organizational). 3. Step 3: Make recommendations. Consider the most appropriate solutions using your OB knowledge and tools. Then
- 21. map these onto the causes (inputs or processes). Selecting a