2. Realize the need for decision-making from many perspectives and
will be able to factor in control discussion with each decision.
The participant will be able to :
Terminal Objectives
3. Apply the steps in the decision-making process.
Acknowledge barriers that may prevent people to define problems correctly.
Determine the 4 styles of Decision Making
Identify why people can not reach agreement through “Abilene Paradox” movie
and how to overcome it.
Use some techniques for making managerial decisions like Six thinking hats
Use at least 2 methods of decision making in groups
The participant will be able to :
Specific Objectives
11. To Make a Decision you
Need to know:
• The nature of the problem.
• The time available.
• The cost of individual strategies.
12. Decision making process
• Experience .
• Watching .
• Trial & Errors.
• The scientific method of decision making.
Methods of Decision Making
14. 1 2 3 4 5
Recognize
and analyze
the problem
Gather
Data
Choose a
solution
and Take
Action
Determining
Workable
Solutions
Evaluate
Solutions
6
Follow
Up
Problem Solving process
15. Problem Solving process
Recognize and analyze the problem
Step 1
Working on the right problem .
Analyze the cause and symptoms for
the problem .
16. Blocks to problem definition
1) Previous Learning
2) Ambiguity
3) Defining the problem by solution.
4) Identifying symptoms as problems.
5) Artificial boundaries
6) Perceptual problems
7) Solving the wrong problem
Problem Solving process
17. Previous learning
• Learning influences what we see and hear .
• “ We have always done it that way” is one of the
biggest blocks to effective analysis.
• The unwillingness or inability to let go of old habits
can be a major stumbling block to seeing problems.
Blocks to problem definition
Problem Solving process
19. Ambiguity
• Looking at the same information, two people can see different things.
• Not just enough to get data, they must describe the problem
meaningfully.
Problem Solving process
Blocks to problem definition
27. Decision making process
Gather Data
Step 3
There are data for all the stages .
Obtain data by asking, observing, &
studying .
Be specific about who , what, when &
how .
28. Evaluate Solutions
Step 4
The alternatives-outcomes relationship is based on three possible
conditions:
Certainty
Risks
Uncertainty
Problem Solving process
32. Reasons for poor Decision Making
• Why people fail sometimes to take a good
decision?
1. No enough time to gather all the information
2. It is easier to stay in the same course
• Less time consuming
• Fewer risk
• Requires no changes
3. They are insecure
4. Afraid of change – change involves risk
33. 5. They lack the courage
6. Poor self concept
7. Over reliance on logic and ignoring the common
sense or gut feeling
8. lack of experience
9. Other personality issues:
• Hostility
• Negativism
• Prejudgment
• Arrogance
• Poor motivation
Reasons for poor Decision Making
34. •10. Poor habits
• Delay
• Digging into details
• Lack of delegation
•11. Other personal factors:
• Individuals value system
• Individuals’ role perception
• What is the individual thinks others
expecting of them
Reasons for poor Decision Making
36. Methods of Group Decision Making
Decision by Authority
without Discussion
Expert Member
Decision by Authority
with Discussion
Consensus
Majority Control
Minority Control
38. • Useful for simple routine
decision.
• When group members expect
the designated leader to make
decision.
• Used when team members lack
skills and information
Advantages
Methods of Group Decision Making
Decision by authority WITHOUT discussion
1
• One person is not a good
resources for every decision.
• Advantages of group interaction
are lost.
• Resources of other members are
not used.
Disadvantages
39. Decision by authority AFTER discussion
2
Methods of Group Decision Making
Decision by authority WITH discussion
2
40. • Uses the resources of group
members.
• Gain benefits of group discussion.
Advantages
Methods of Group Decision Making
• Does not resolve the controversies
and conflicts among group
members.
• Create a kind of nepotism.
Disadvantages
Decision by authority WITH discussion
2
42. • Useful when the expertise of one
person so far superior to that of
all other group members.
Advantages
Methods of Group Decision Making
• It is difficult to determine who the
expert is.
• Advantages of group interaction
are lost.
• Resources of other members are
not used.
Disadvantages
Decision by Expert Members
3
44. • Can be used when sufficient time
is lacking for decision by
consensus.
• When complete member
commitment is not necessary of
implementing decision .
Advantages
Methods of Group Decision Making
• Usually leaves an alienated
minority which damages future
group effectiveness.
• Advantages of group interaction
are lost.
Disadvantages
Decision by Majority Control
4
46. • When everyone cannot meet to
make a decision.
• When the group is under time
pressure.
• When complete member
commitment is not necessary.
Advantages
Methods of Group Decision Making
• Does not utilize the resources of
many group members.
• Unresolved conflict may damage
future group effectiveness.
Disadvantages
Decision by Minority
5
48. • Produces an innovative, creative,
and high-quality decision.
• Elicits commitment by all
members to implement decision .
• Uses resources of all members
Advantages
Methods of Group Decision Making
• Takes a great deal of time and
energy.
• Not useful in emergency situation.
Disadvantages
Decision by Consensus
6
52. Decision Making Styles
Way of Thinking
High
Low
Rational Intuitive
Tolerance
for
Ambiguity
Analytical Conceptual
Directive Behavioral
53. Directive Style
Analytical Style
Conceptual Style
Behavioral Style
People who prefer simple, clear-cut solutions to problems
Make decisions quickly
May consider only one or two alternatives
Efficient and rational
Prefer rules or procedures
Decision Making Styles
54. Directive Style
Analytical Style
Conceptual Style
Behavioral Style
Complex solutions based on as much data as they can
gather
Carefully consider alternatives
Base decision on objective, rational data
Search for best possible decision based on information
available
Decision Making Styles
55. Directive Style
Analytical Style
Conceptual Style
Behavioral Style
More socially oriented
Consider others about the problem and possible solutions
Consider many broad alternatives and information
Rely on information from people and systems
Solve problems creatively
Decision Making Styles
56. Directive Style
Analytical Style
Conceptual Style
Behavioral Style
Deep concern for others
Talk to people one-on-one
Understand individual feelings about the problem and
possible effects.
Concerned with the personal development of others
Decisions to help others achieve their goals
Decision Making Styles
60. 1- Simple “Pros & Cons” method
• This method can be used to evaluate a decision to be taken
or not. “Pros” means the advantages, while “Cons” means
the disadvantages.
• Giving a score from 1 to 5 to weight each Pro & Con
• Then add the scores for Pros & scores for Cons
• Compare which one will be greater
• If the “Pros” score, then take the decision…otherwise don’t
Your scores are just estimation from your point of view and
depend on your personal preferences
61. 1- Simple “Pros & Cons” method
Example: I want to buy a new car instead of the old one
Pros Score Cons Score
Better Comfort 3 Cost outlay will mean making sacrifice 5
Lower Fuel Cost 3 Higher Insurance 3
Lower Servicing Cost 4 Disposal of old car 2
Better reliability 3 Time & hassle 2
Better for family use 5 Big Decision scare me 4
Load off my mind 2
Total 20 Total 16
72. • Helps you look at important decisions from several different
perspectives.
• Reduce the resistance to change and prepared by essential
contingency plans.
• It helps you understand the full complexity of a decision.
• It spots issues and opportunities which you might not
notice.
The Advantages
73. Suggestion for good decision making
1. Have your goals clearly in mind or in written form before you
proceed to formulate your options.
2. Establish your priorities so that every decision contributes
toward goal achievement
3. Be more creative as possible .Look for group of ideas.
4. Decision-making is simply a mental exercise which must be
transferred into action.
5. Each decision has the potential of causing a chain of reactions.
6. Don’t be quick to reopen decisions already made.
7. Use a simulation exercise or a trial run to determine
correctness.
Editor's Notes
#9:المشكلات programed:-
هى تكون متكررة و تخضع الى لامكانية برمجتها او الحلول النمطية ( اللوائح و التعليمات ) انقطاع الموظف عن العمل & تاخير توريد كوابل .
المشكلات non programmed :-
هى المشكلات الجديدة والاستثنائية والتى تحتاج الى ابتكار وابداع للتوصل الى حلول مناسبة لمواجهتها مثل انخفاض الاداء الروح المعنوية للموظف & منتج جديد .
#10:It is a tool because it can help you solve an immediate problem or to achieve a goal.
It is a skill because once you have learnt it you can use it repeatedly, like the ability to ride a bicycle, add numbers or speak a language.
It is also a process because it involves taking a number of steps.
#11: ينبغى ان يراعى القرار فى جميع الاحوال النقاط الاتية :-
1- طبيعة المشكلة
2- الوقت المتاح
3- التكلفة الموجودة لكل استراتيجية هتبعها
4- القدرات الفكرية لمتخذى القرار
#12: هناك اربعة اساليب يتم اتباعها فى اتخاذ القرارات :-
1- الخبرة :- استخدام الخبرات السابقة على اساس ان المشكلات الحاليه تتشابه مع المشكلات السابقة
2- المشاهدة :- التقليد واتطبيق الحلول التى اتبعها مديرون اخرون فى حل مشاكل شبيهه
3- التجربة والخطأ :- التى قد تصيب وقد لا تصيب
4- الاسلوب العلمى لاتخذا القرارات :-
#15: تحديد وتحليل المشكلة :-
من المهم تحديد المشكلة قبل الشروع فى خطوات اتخاذ القرار فاى خطأ فى هذه المرحلة او الخطوة يؤدى بنا الى معالجة المشكلة الخطأ .
تحديد المشكلة يحدد لنا الهذف بصورة واضحة وفى هذه المرحلة نحتاج الى جمع المعلومات للتعرف على مظاهر المشكلة واعراضها واسبابها
وهنا يجب ان نضع ايدينا على اجابات للاسئلة الاتية :-
1- هل يحتاج الامر لفريق عمل لتحليل المشكلة ؟
2- من لديه سلطة القرار ؟ هل نحتاج لخبرات خاصة ؟
3- من سوف يتأثر بالقرار ؟
4- مدى الوقت الكافى لاتخاذ القرار ؟
#16: لعل من اهم الخطوات للتعامل مع المشكلة هو تحديدها جيدا .... الا ان هذه الخطوة تتعثر كثيرا بسبب معوقات مزمنة ينبغى ان نتخلص منها وهى :-
1 - المعرفة المسبقة
2 – اللبس او الغموض
3 - تعريف المشكلة بالحل
4 – تعريف الاعراض على انها مشكلة
#17:المعرفة المسبقة :-
- ممكن ان ندرك ذلك من المقولة الشائعة ( نحن نعالج الموقف بالاسلوب كذا .......... )
- اى اننا نصبح اسرى افكارنا القديمة التى قد لا تتناسب مع الموقف والمستجدات الأخرى
- كما انه يعوق انطلاق الفكر الابتكارى والابداع
مثال النحل او الدبابير
#18:المعرفة المسبقة :-
- ممكن ان ندرك ذلك من المقولة الشائعة ( نحن نعالج الموقف بالاسلوب كذا .......... )
- اى اننا نصبح اسرى افكارنا القديمة التى قد لا تتناسب مع الموقف والمستجدات الأخرى
- كما انه يعوق انطلاق الفكر الابتكارى والابداع
مثال النحل و الذباب الـ previous learning للنحل منعه من ان يشوف ويحدد المشكله
- ﺩﻳﺴﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :
ﻟﻦ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻭﺟﺪﻫﺎ ،
ﻭﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ، ﻟﺬﺍ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻨﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺤﺎﻭﻝ
ﻃﺮﻕ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﺗﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻟﻢ ﻳﺄﻟﻔﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ، ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺤﺮﺭﻩ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻄﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺗﻴﻦ .
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺤﺠﺮﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻞ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻤﺄﺯﻕ ، ﻭﻳﺤﺎﻭﻝ ﺑﺸﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺨﺮﺝ ﺑﺎﺗﺠﺎﻩ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﺄﻟﻮﻑ ، ﻭﻻ
ﻳﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻃﺮﻕ ﺑﺪﻳﻠﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺔ .
ﻓﺤﺮﺭ ﻋﻘﻠﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻭﺗﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻬﻮﺩ ، ﻭﺍﺟﻌﻞ ﺃﻓﻘﻚ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﺎً ،
ﻭﺍﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻓﺪ ﻭﻭﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﺪﺩﺓ ، ﻭﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺗﺠﺎﻩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﻓﻠﻌﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺤﻞ .
#21: مثال البطاريه والعربيه لو العربيه مش بتدور فتقول نغير البطاريه وممكن المشكلة فى حاجه تانية .
المهندس الحسينى - كل حريقه تحصل فى السنترالات يقولوا ماس كهربائى او اى سنترال يخرج ممن الخدمة يقولك باور
#22: تعريف الاعراض على انها المشكلة :-
مثال ( المشكلة ان هناك 32 % انخفاض فى عدد اوامر الشغل ) وقد يكون صحيحا لكن ده احد اعراض المشكلة وليست المشكلة نفسها
مثال حى كلنا بنمر به ( الصداع والحرارة المرتفعة يقوللك خد برشامة صداع او خافض للحرارة هلى انت كده عالجت المرض لا العرض لان ممكن تكون المشكلة صداع نصفى – ارتفاع ضغط العين – اللوز فى الحرارة )
#24: المشاكل الافتراضية :-
فى بعض الاحيان بنضع افتراضات غير واقعية و غير دقيقة وهذا يجعلنا لا ندرك المشكلة فالناس لايضعون المشكلة فى سياقها الطبيعى فاما
يهون المشكلة under estimate
او يهول المشكلة over estimate مثال الاوبرا
لايعرف السبب من النتيجه مش عارف الroot cause ال cause and effect وال 5 whys
#29: الهدف من اختيار احد البدائل هو تحقيق هدف محدد مسبقا
لا يوجد قرار مثالى على متخذ القرار ان ياخذ ويختار افضل البدائل التى تتوافق مع الاهداف المحددة مسبقا
#30: نتيجة لتقييم كل بديل و لكى نحصل على الحل الافضل ينبغى ان ناخذ فى الاعتبارات الاتية :-
1- الاحتمالات المؤكدة : اى النتائج التى تؤكد المعلومات لدى متخذ القرار او لدى معلومات كافية تبدى ان هذا البديل نتائجه 100% هتحقق الحل .
2- المخاطر : وهى الاحتمالات الواردة ونسبتها وهناك وسيلتين لتحديد نسبة المخاطر:
احتمالات موضوعية objective Probability اى مبنية على بيانات سابقة او سجل تاريخى
التقدير الشخصى subjective probability لمتخذ القرار على ضوء عدم كفاية البيانات وفى هذه الحالة يجب ان يكون الشخص على خبره كافية وواقعية ودراية بكافة المتغيرات الواردة
3- الاحتمالات الغير مؤكده :- وفى هذه الحالة التى يصعب تماما على متخذ القرار ان يتوقع الاحتمالات الواردة وذلك لغياب المعلومات وفى هذه الحالة يرجع التقدير الى شخصية متخذ القرار ويعتمد على التوقع prediction والخبره Experience
#59:كة ريبوك كان عندها مشكلة فى اهمال الموظفين وتكاسلهم عن العمل وتضييع الوقت فقام مدير الشركة باتخاذ قرار حاسم وهو تبنى سياسة جديدة واطلق عليها مايسمى ب
defense right in here