“MID FACE FRACTURES”
PRESENTED BY :
DR. SAVAN CHOVATIA (MDS PART2 OMFS)
AHMEDABAD DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
GUIDED BY :
DR NEHA VYAS(HOD & PROFESSOR, MDS)
DR NITU SHAH(PROFESSOR,MDS)
DR SACHIN DALAL(PROFESSOR,MDS)
INDEX
 INTRODUCTION
 BONES OF MIDFACE
 ANATOMIC CONSIDIRATION
 HISTORY
 ETIOLOGY
 CLASSIFICATION
 CLINICAL FEATURES:
 RADIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION
 MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION
 Face is intimately related to self image.
 Facial features depend upon underlying bony frame work.
• The maxillofacial region has special importance because of its proximity
to the all important brain-case as well as respiratory passages.
 The maxilla represents the bridge between the cranial base superiorly
and the dentition inferiorly.
 Its intimate association with the oral cavity, nasal cavity, and orbits
and the important structures adjacent to it make the maxilla a functionally
and cosmetically important structure.
 It is a region responsible for senses like vision, smell, hearing and
taste and resonance of voice.
 Fracture of these bones is potentially life-threatening as well as
disfiguring.
 Hence we being maxillofacial surgeons need to do systematic and
timely repair of these fractures to correct deformity and prevent
unfavorable sequalae.
 To reconstruct the face following trauma is highly demanding
and requires uncompromising care.
WHAT IS MID FACE??
 Area between a superior plane drawn
through the zygomaticofrontal sutures
tangential to the base of the skull and
an inferior plane at the level of the
maxillary dental occlusal surfaces.
 These planes do not parallel each other
but converge posteriorly at a level
approximating that of the foramen
magnum
 Triangular region with its widest
dimension facing anteriorly.
BONES OF MIDFACE :
Paired Bones Unpaired Bones
Maxilla Vomer
Zygomatic bone Ethmoid
Zygomatic process of
temporal bone
Sphenoid (Pterygoid
plates)
Palatine bone
Nasal bone
Lacrimal bone
Inferior conchae
(17 BONES)
Anatomical specimen showing the disarticulated bones of the skull exploded
and mounted to demonstrate their complex interrelationship.
 These facial bones in isolation are comparatively fragile but gain
strength and support as they articulate with each other.
 It is this strength gained from each other that has been described
as the facial buttress by Manson.
• Area of strength
• Vertical and horizontal pillars
• Muscular attachment
• Area of weakness
• Sutures
• Lining tissues and air-filled cavities
MECHANISM OF MIDFACE FRACTURE :
Vertical buttress:
 nasomaxillary
 zygomaticomaxillary
 pterygomaxillary
Horizontal buttress:
 frontal bar(supra orbital
rims)
 infra orbital rims
 maxillary palate
Midface fractures
Vertical and horizontal pillars:
Midface is admirably equipped to withstand
forces in inferior superior directions.
Poorly constructed to withstand lateral and
frontal forces.
11
ANATOMICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
∏ This structure is analogous to a matchbox sitting below and anterior to hard
shell containing brain
∏ Act as cushion for trauma directed towards cranium from anterior or antero-
lateral direction
MAXILLA
 The maxilla consists of a central body and four processes
namely the frontal, zygomatic, alveolar and palatine process.
The body is hollowed out and contains the maxillary sinus.
 It is pyramidal shaped with the base being the medial surface
facing the nasal cavity and the apex being elongated into the
zygomatic process. It has an orbital or superior surface which
forms the floor and rim of the orbit, a malar or anterolateral
surface which forms part of the cheek and a posterolateral or
infratemporal surface which contributes to the infratemporal
fossa. The base is rimmed inferiorly by the alveolar process.
 The alveolar process houses the dental arch with the
sockets varying in size according to the teeth. The
palatine process is a horizontal process and medially
articulates with the palatine process of the opposite
maxilla which posteriorly it articulates with the
horizontal plate of the palatine bone.
 The zygomatic process is an extension of the
anterolateral surface of the body which contributes to
the zygomaticomaxillary suture.
 The frontal process projects upward to articulate with
the maxillary process of the frontal bone as well as the
nasal bone anteriorly and the lacrimal bone posteriorly.
 It encloses a cavity maxillary sinus.
ZYGOMA
 The name zygoma is derived from the word meaning a yoke (i.e. a
structure that connects various parts together).
 It is often described as a diamond or pyramidal shaped bone
 The posterior surface contributes to the temporal fossa.
 Projecting superiorly is the frontal process which articulates with the
zygomatic process of the frontal bone in front and greater wing of
sphenoid behind to form the lateral wall and rim of the orbit.
 Posterolaterally the temporal process articulates with the zygomatic
process of the temporal bone to form the zygomatic arch.
 Inferiorly and it broadly articulates with the maxilla to form the
inferior orbital rim and contributes to the orbital floor as well as the
zygomaticomaxillary buttress
NASAL BONES
The paired quadrilateral bones form the
upper part of the bridge of the nose
and articulate with the frontal process
of the maxilla laterally and with each
other in the midline. Superiorly they
articulate with the frontal bone.
LACRIMAL BONES
 Each lacrimal bone is irregularly rectangular
forming part of the medial wall of the orbit.
 They articulate posteriorly with the paper thin
(lamina papyracea) part of the ethmoid,
superiorly with the frontal bone and inferiorly
with the body of the maxilla.
 The sharp orbital vertical lacrimal crest
continues inferiorly to form the lacrimal
hamulus, with its concave portion housing the
lacrimal sac.
 The first clinical examination of a maxillary fracture was recorded in 2500 BC.
 In 1822 Charles Fredrick William Reiche provided the first detailed description of
maxillary fractures.
 In 1823 Carl Ferdinand van Graefe described the use of a head frame for treating a
maxillary fracture.
HISTORY :
 In 1901 , Rene Le Fort published his landmark work, a three-part experiment using
32 cadavers.
 The heads of the cadavers were subjected to low velocity forces; the soft tissue were
then removed and the bones were examined.
HISTORY:
 Le Fort noted that generally face was fractured and the skull was not. He then stated
that fractures occurred through three weak lines in the facial bony structure. From
these three lines the Le Fort classification system was developed.
HISTORY
External Fixation
Craniomaxillary fixation- Wassmund’s(1927) maxillary splint
with side bars attached to a head cap
ETIOLOGY:
∏ Assault
∏ RTA
∏ Alcohol and Drug abuse
∏ Gunshot wounds
∏ Sports
∏ Falls
∏ Industrial accidents
Classification
1. ALPHONSO GUERIN(1886)
2. RENE LE FORT FRACTURE CLASSIFICATION (1901)
3. ROWE AND WILLIAM CLASSIFICATION (1985)
4. MODIFIED LE FORT CLASSIFICATION (MARCIANI,1993)
5. ERICH’S CLASSIFICATION (1942)
 •Le Fort I
 •Le Fort II
 •Le Fort III
Le Fort classification:
1) Rene Le Fort classification (1901):
3. Rowe & william’s classification :
 A – FRACTURES NOT INVOLVING DENTOALVEOLAR
COMPONENTS
1. Central region
a- fracture of nasal bone &/or nasal septum
- lateral nasal injuries
- anterior nasal injuries
b- fractures of frontal process of maxilla
c- fractures of type a & b which extend into ethmoid
bone
d- fractures of type a ,b ,c which extends into frontal
bone
2.Lateral region-
Fractures involving zygomatic bone,arch & maxilla excluding
dentoalveolar component
 B –FRACTURES INVOLVING DENTOALVEOLAR COMPONENT
1.Central region
a-dentoalveolar fractures
b-lefort I (subzygomatic fractures)
2.Combined central & lateral region
a-high level
b-LeFort III with midline split
c-LeFort III with midline split + fracture
of roof of orbit or frontal bone
Limitations of the lefort classification
• The LeFort classification has proven to be less satisfactory
to describe more complex fracture patterns, comminuted,
incomplete, combination maxillary fractures or to describe
fractures of the part bearing the occlusal segment.
2) Marciani modification of Le Fort:
 LE FORT I: LOW MAXILLARY FRACTURE
 Le Fort I (a)Le fort I -multiple
segment
 LE FORT II:PYRAMIDAL FRACTURE
 Le Fort II (a) : le fort II + nasal
 Le Fort II (b) : le fort II (a) + ethmoid
 LE FORT III: CRANIOFACIAL DYSJUNSTION
 Le Fort III (a) : Le Fort III + nasal fracture
 Le Fort III (b) : Le Fort III (a) + ethmoid
 LE FORT IV: LE FORT II OR LE FORT III WITH
CRANIAL BASE
 Le Fort IV (a) : Le Fort IV with supraorbital
rim
 Le Fort IV (b) : Le Fort IV + anterior cranial
base
 Le Fort IV (c) : Le Fort IV (b) + le fort IV(a)
PREVALENCE OF MID-FACE
FRACTURES
Fracture Type Prevalence
Zygomaticomaxillary complex (tripod fracture) 40 %
LeFort
I 15 %
II 10 %
III 10 %
Zygomatic arch 10 %
Alveolar process of maxilla 5 %
Smash fractures 5 %
Other 5 %
 Erich’s classification (1942)
 Horizontal, pyramidal, transverse
 Classification based on relationship of fracture line to zygomatic bone
 Subzygomatic, suprazygomatic
 Classification based on level of fracture line
 Low, mid, high level fractures
PALATAL FRACTURE:
 Handrickson M, Clark n,
Manson P,Palatal fracture
classification, patterns and
Treatment with rigid internal
fixation:. Plast recostr surg
101(2):319-332,1998
TYPE 1:
Anterior alveolus
Type 2:
posterolateral
Type 3:
sagittal
Type 4:
parasagittal
Type 5:
ParaAlveolar
Type 6:
Complex/comminuted
Type 7: transverse
LEFORT I
A violent force applied over a more extensive are, above the
level of the teeth will result in a Le Fort I Fracture.
Which is not confined to smaller section of the alveolar bone
Low-level fracture, a subzygomatic Fracture.
Guerin’s fracture
Horizontal fracture
Floating fracture
Midface fractures
LEFORT 1 : Fracture line:
 I st line : starts from the lateral border of the pyriform
aperture passes above the nasal floor, then it goes
posteriorly above the canine fossa going backward
below the zygomatic butress coming on the posterior
wall of the maxilla, where it rises abruptly crossing the
pterygo-maxillary fissure & breaks the pterygoid plates
in lower1/3 & upper 2/3 parts.
 2nd line : starts from same starting point and also
passes along the lateral wall of nose and subsequently
joins the lateral line of # behind the tuberosity.
 3rd line : detaches the nasal septum from anterior
nasal spine upto vomer bone.
 A typical Lefort-I fracture is always bilateral with the fracture of lower third of
nasal septum.
 It can also occur as unilateral fracture.
 Lefort-I may occur as a single entity or in association with Lefort-II & III #.
LEFORT II
LEFORT II
 Pyramidal fracture or
subzygomatic fracture
 Violent force, usually from an
anterior direction, sustained by the
central region of the middle third
of the facial skeleton over an area
extending from the glabella to the
alveolar margin results in a fracture
of a pyramid shape.
 The force may be delivered at the
level of the nasal bones.
FRACTURE LINE
 it starts just below the
frontonasal suture bilaterally
 Runs from the thin middle area
of the nasal bones down either
side.
 Crossing the frontal processes
of the maxillae into the medial
wall of each orbit.
 Within each orbit, the fracture
line crosses the lacrimal bone
behind the lacrimal sac.
 Before turning forwards to cross the infra-
orbital margin slightly medial to or through
the infra-orbital foramen.
 The fracture now extends downwards and
backwards across the lateral wall of the
antrum below the zygomatic-maxillary
suture.
 Divides the pterygoid lamina about
halfway up.
LE FORT 2: Fracture Line
LEFORT III
LEFORT III
 Suprazygomatic or transverse
fracture or high level fracture.
 The line of fracture extends above
the zygomatic bones on the both
sides as a result of trauma being
inflicted over a wider area, at the
orbital level.
Mechanism of LF3 #:
 Initial impact is taken by the
zygomatic bone resulting in
depressed fracture.
 Then because of the severe degree
of the impact, the entire middle
third will then hinge about the
fragile ethmoid bone.
 The impact will then be transmitted
on the contralateral side resulting
laterally displaced zygomatic
fracture of the opposite side.
THE FRACTURE LINE
 Runs from near the frontonasal suture transversely backwards, parallel
with the base of the skull and involves the full depth of the ethmoid bone,
including the cribriform plate.
 Within the orbit, the fracture passes below the optic foramen into the
posterior limit of the inferior orbital fissure.
 From the base of the inferior orbital fissure the fracture line extends in two
directions:
 Backwards across the pterygo-maxillary fissure to fracture the roots of the
pterygoid laminae.
 Laterally across the lateral wall of the orbit separating the zygomatic bone from
the frontal bone by fronto-zygomatic suture.
 The entire mid-facial skeleton becomes detached from the cranial base.
FZ SUTUTE #
Zygomatic arch#
CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF
MIDFACE FRACTURES
 Extra-oral & Intra-oral examination.
 Inspection.
 Palpation.
Extra-oral examination
Inspection of midface-
 Swelling & Facial Asymmetry.
 Bruising of upper lip and lower half of mid-face.
 Circum-orbital Ecchymosis ( bilateral = Racoon’s
eye).
 Subconjunctival Hemorrhage.
 Periorbital Oedema.
 Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea
 Lengthening of Midface
 Depressed midface (dish face)
 Saddle shaped depression of nose
 Enophthalmos
 Proptosis
 Diplopia
 Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhoea
-Watery nasal or postnasal salty discharge.
CSF content assessment- most reliable
ß2 Transferrin isoenzyme- most diagnostic (pathognomonic of
CSF)
“HALO” sign
Palpation -
1. Subcutaneous Emphysema – Crepitus
2. Tenderness
3. Step Deformity
4. Abnormal Mobility of bone
5. Impairment of sensation
Palpation of facial skeleton
Intra-oral examination
Inspection
1. Disturbed occlusion (posterior occlusal gagging , open bite)
2. Haematoma intraorally over root of zygoma
3. Haematoma in palate (Guiren’s sign)
4. Fractured cusps of teeth
5. Midline diastema
Clinical features:
 Inspection :
 Slight swelling and edema of the lower part of the
face along with the upper lip swelling
 Ecchymosis in the labial and buccal vestibule, as
well as contusion of the skin of the upper lip may be
seen
 Bilateral nasal epistaxis may be observed
 The patient may develop open bite if the
fractured segment is mobile , due to
posterior gagging of occlusion.
 Sometimes fracture of the palate can also
be associated with
Le Fort I fracture.
 Occlusion may be disturbed, difficult
mastication
 Pain while speaking and moving the
jaw
• GUERIN sign: ecchymosis of palate ,
bilateral greater palatine foramen.
PALPATION :
 In Le Fort I, the teeth and maxilla are mobile
(floating maxilla), but the nose and upper
face is fixed.
 Sometimes there will be upward
displacement of the entire fragment,
locking it against the superior intact
structures, such a fracture is called
as impacted or telescopic fracture.
 Percussion of the maxillary teeth results in
distinctive 'cracked-pot sound',
 No tenderness and mobility of the zygomatic
arch and bones.
 Gross edema of soft
tissue
 Bilateral circumorbital
ecchymosis
 Bilateral subconjunctival
hemorrahge
 Obvious deformity of the
nose
 Nasal bleeding and
obstruction
 CSF leak rhinorrhea
 Dish-face deformity
 Limitation of ocular
movement
 Possible diplopia and
enophthalmous
 Retropostioning of the
maxilla with anterior open
bite
 Lengthening of the face
 Difficulty in mouth opening
 Mobility of the upper jaw
 Occasional hematoma of
the palate
 Cracked-pot sound on
percussion
Common features of LF2&3:
SPECIFIC FEATURE OF LF2#:
 Step deformity at infra-orbiatal margin
 Anasthesia of midface
 Nasal bone moves with mid-face as a whole
SPECIFIC FEATURE OF LF3#:
 Tenderness and sepration at FZ suture
 Tenderness and deformity of zygomatic arch
 Depression of occular level and pseudoptosis
Clinical features:
Clinical features -
 The resulting gross edema of the
middle third gives an appearance
of "moon face" to the patient.
• Depressed nasal bridge,
• Dish shape deformity.
 CSF rhinorrhoea is possible and should be
looked for.
 Bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis giving an
appearance of 'raccoon eyes' is invariably seen
in the fractures of both Le Fort II and Le Fort
III.
 Subconjunctival hemorrhage develops rapidly
in the area adjacent to the site of injury.(mostly
in medial half )
 Diplopia may be seen in cases of orbital
floor injury.
 Pupils are at level unless there is gross
unilateral enophthalmos.
 Anaesthesia or paraesthesia of the
cheek as a result of injury to the
infraorbital nerve due to the fracture of
the inferior orbital rim.
 On intraoral examination, retropositioning of the whole maxilla
and gagging of the occlusion are seen.
 Hematoma formation is seen in the buccal sulcus opposite to the
maxillary first and second molar teeth as a result of fracture of the
zygomatic buttress.
 Step deformity at the infraorbital rims or
frontonasal junction is noticed.
 Orbital wall fractures can cause
entrapment with limitation of ocular
movement.
Extraoral palpation of LFII:
 When maxillary teeth are
grasped, the mid-facial
skeleton moves as a pyramid
and the movement can be
detected at the infraorbital
margin and the nasal bridge.
Clinical features:
LE FORT III FRACTURE
Clinical features -
 Gross oedema of the face.
 Bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis with subconjunctival hemorrhage.
 Characteristic 'dish face' appearance with lengthening of the face.
 'Hooding of eyes' may be seen due to separation of the
frontozygomatic suture.
 Deformity of the zygomatic arches.
 Difficulty in opening the mouth, inability to move lower
jaw.
 CSF rhinorrhoea.
 Depression of ocular levels.
 ‘Battle’s Sign’
 Tenderness and often separation of the
bones at the frontozygomatic suture.
 Mobility of the whole of facial skeleton
as a single unit.
 When lateral displacement has taken
place tilting of the occlusal plane and
gagging of one side is seen.
Radiographic Examination :
1. plain Radiograph
 Min 2 radiograph
 90* to eachother
2. CT SCAN
 Coronal and axial view
 3d reconstruction
 Opg
 Lateral view
 15/30 degrees occipitomental view
 Submentovertex view
 Cranial postero anterior view.
 PA view (Water’s View)
30 DEGREE SUBMENTO
VERTEX (NORMAL)
LATERAL VIEW
WATER,S VIEW NORMAL
Coronal CT demonstrating a right Le Fort I
fracture and a left Le Fort II fracture.
CT - SCAN
radiographic features:
LEFORT I – Waters view
Midface fractures
Pterygoid Plate Fractures in lefort I
CT findings - axial section
3D - CT
radiographic features:
Midface fractures
CT findings - coronal section
The blue arrows show bilateral fracture of the pterygoid
processes, which is a common association in all three
types of Le Fort fractures.
CT findings - axial section
Middle age man in motor vehicle accident.
Fracture lines are demonstrated in red
arrows.
Three-dimensional reconstruction of a
patient with right Le Fort I fracture and
a left Le Fort II fracture
3D - CT
radiographic features:
Midface fractures
32-year-old man, driver in a motor vehicle
accident.
.
3D - CT
MANAGEMENT
1. Emergency care & Stabilization -
( First aid and resuscitation )
2. Initial Assessment and Early care-
3. Definitive Treatment-
4. Rehabilitation -
STAGE I - Emergency care & Stabilization
1. Maintenance of airway.
2. Control of hemorrhage.
3. Prevent or control shock.
4. C-Spine stabilization.
5. Control of life-threatening injuries.
Head injuries, chest injuries, compound limb fractures,
intra abdominal bleeding.
Midface fractures
Emergency Care
A) Airway Maintainance -
Existence & identification of obstruction.
Manually clear fractured teeth, blood clots,
dentures.
Endotracheal intubation if needed.
NOTE:
 Altered level of consciousness is the most
common cause of upper airway obstruction.
B) Breathing and ventilation
 Airway patency alone does not ensure adequate
ventilation
 Adequate gas exchange is required to maximize
oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination
 Ventilation requires adequate function of the lungs,
chest wall, and diaphragm
C) Circulation & hemorrhage control
 Hemorrhage is most common cause of
shock after injury.
 Multiple injury patients have
hypovolemia.
 Monitor vital signs closely.
 Goal is to restore organ perfusion.
Treatment of Blood Loss & Shock
 External bleeding controlled by direct pressure
over bleeding site.
 Gain prompt access to vascular system with IV
catheters.
 Fluid replacement:
Ringer’s Lactate
Normal saline
Transfusion.
D) DISABILITY (NEUROLOGICEVALUATION)
 A rapid neurologic evaluation is performed at the end
of the primary survey
 The Glassgow Comma Scale (GCS) is a quick, simple
method for determining the level of consciousness
PATIENT SCORE DETERMINES
CATEGORY OF NEUROLOGIC
IMPAIR
SCORE
>15 = NORMAL
13-14= MILD INJURY
9-12 = MODERATE INJURY
3-8 = SEVERE INJURY
E) EXPOSURE ANDENVIRONMENTAL
CONTROL
 The patient should be completely undressed
 usually by cutting off his or her garments to
facilitate a thorough examination and
assessment
The patient’s body temperature is more important than
the comfort of the healthcare providers.
Stabilization of associated injuries
 C-spine injury is primary concern with all
maxillofacial trauma victims.
Signs/symptoms of C-Spine injury
Neurologic deficit.
Neck pain.
Stabilization of associated injuries
 C-spine injury suspected:
Avoid any movement of
neck
Establish & maintain
proper immobilization
until vertebral fractures or
spinal cord injuries ruled
out
Lateral C-spine
radiographs
CT of C-spine
Neurologic exam
STAGE II. Initial Assessment and Early care
 Emergency care has stabilized patient.
 Initial stabilization of fractures.
 Debridement & dressing of soft tissues.
 Physical exam & history.
 Laboratory tests.
 Clinical & Radiographic Assessment of Patient.
Diagnosis of maxillofacial injuries.
 Pre-operative planning.
STAGE II. Initial Assessment
 Pre-operative planning
1. Need for Tracheostomy
2. Surgical Approaches to Midface
3. Whether ‘Open’ or ‘Closed’ methods of reduction are to be
employed.
4. Necessity for & type of Maxillary fracture Fixation.
STAGE II. Initial Assessment
 Pre-operative planning
 Surgical Approaches to Midface
Pre-operative planning
 Principle of treatment for Mid face #:
 CONSERVATIVE
 OPERATIVE/SURGICAL: REDUCTION and FIXATION
 Indications for Closed Reduction:
 Non displaced fracture,
 Grossly comminuted fractures,
 Fractures exposed by significant loss of overlying soft tissues,
 Edentulous maxillary fractures,
 In children with developing dentition.
 Indications for open reduction:
 Displaced fractures,
 Multiple fractures of the facial bones,
 Fractures of the edentulous maxilla with severe displacement,
 Delay of treatment and interposition of soft tissues between non-contacting
displaced fracture segments, Specific systemic conditions contraindicating IMF.
1. Supraorbital eyebrow incision (Lefort III)
2. Subciliary incision (LeFort II & III)
3. Median lower lid (LeFort II & III)
4. Infraorbital incision (LeFort II & III)
5. Transconjunctival (LeFort II )
6. Zygomatic arch
7. Transverse nasal (LeFort II & III)
8. Vertical nasal incision (LeFort II & III)
9. Medial orbital incision.
10. Intra-oral vestibular incision. (LeFort I)
Incisions for exposure of LeFort
fractures
Classification of methods of Maxillary Fracture Fixation
A ) Internal Fixation-
1. Suspension Wires
2. Direct Osteosynthesis
B) External Fixation-
1. Craniomandibular
2. Craniomaxillary
Internal Fixation
Suspension Wires – non-rigid osteosynthesis -
i. Frontal-central or laterally placed
ii. Circumzygomatic
iii. Zygomatic
iv. Circumpalatal/palatal screw
v. Infraorbital
vi. Piriform Aperture
vii. Peralveolar
Internal Fixation
Suspension Wires- Circumzygomatic wiring by Obwegeser.
Internal Fixation
Suspension Wires-
Circumzygomatic wiring by Obwegeser
Internal Fixation
Suspension Wires- Orbital rim wiring
Suspension Wires-
Piriform aperture wiring
Type of Suspension Wire Type of Le Fort Fracture
1. Frontal
a. Central Le Fort III & II
b. Lateral Le Fort III & II
2.
Circumzygomatic
Le Fort I & II
3. Zygomatic Le Fort I
4. Infraorbital Le Fort I
5. Piriform Aperture Le Fort I
Summary of Suspension wiring according to fracture site
Disadvantages of Suspension Wiring
 Incomplete fixation of fractured fragments
 Insufficient visualization of fractures by closed
reduction
 Compression against the cranial base
 No 3-dimensional stability
 Patients dislike intra-oral splints as it hinders
oral hygiene maintainence.
Internal Fixation
Direct Osteosynthesis -
1. Interosseous Wires.
2. Plates and Screws.
Direct osteosynthesis
Intraosseous Wires-
1. Maxillary (Lefort –I )
2. Zygomaticomaxillary (Lefort –II)
3. Frontonasal (LeFort –II &III)
4. Zygomaticofrontal (Lefort III)
5. Zygomatic bone (comminuted)
Disadvantages -
 Non rigid type of osteosynthesis
 No 3 dimensional stability, it provides only
monoplane traction.
 IMF is always needed
 Interfragmentary pressure can not be controlled.
 Under functional stress, wire loses rigidity, direction
control and surface contact.
 Delayed healing because of micromovement at
fracture site.
Direct osteosynthesis-
2. Plates & Screws for midface fractures -
 Stainless steel mini-plating system
 Titanium mini-plating system
 Vitallium, Cobalt chromium, molybdenum alloy plates
 Bioresorbable plating system.
Miniplates and screws
These are monocortical, semi-rigid fixation
device which provide 3D stability.
Designs: X, H, L, T, Y
Thickness:0.6-1 mm
Type of metals: Stainless steel, Titanium,
Vitallium
Advantages:Easily adaptable,
Monocortical, Functional stability,
Reduced surgical access
Micro plates
Harle & duker(1975;Luhr(1979)
0.3 – 0.6 mm
Used for : FN region ,Frontal bone,Frontal process of
maxilla
Sites of application:Linear/T/Y plate at FN
region,Long curve plate for frontal process of maxilla
or frontal bone
Mesh fixation Used for retention and alignment of
small fragments or bone grafts.
Sites of application: Anterior and lateral wall of
maxilla and Anterior table of frontal bone
Bone plate osteosynthesis
Advantages –
1. Simple & less intraoperative time
2. Intraoral approach is sufficient
3. Postoperative IMF is not needed or
period of IMF is reduced.
4. Three dimensional stability and early
return of function.
 STAGE III. DEFINITIVE TREATMENT
 LEFORT I FRACTURE
 LEFORT II FRACTURE
 LEFORT III FRACTURE
 STAGE III. DEFINITIVE TREATMENT
LEFORT I FRACTURE
SURGICAL APPROACH- MAXILLARY VESTIBULAR
1.
2.
3.
4.
REDUCTION- ROWE OR HAYTON WILLIAMS FORCEP
FIXATION- 4-point fixation with MINIPLATE.
IMMOBILISATION- MAXILLOMANDIBULAR FIXATION(MMF)
LEFORT II FRACTURE
 SURGICAL APPROACH-
A – Subciliary incision
B – Sub tarsal incision
C - Infraorbital incision
D - Extension of
Subciliary incision
Existing Laceration
Maxillary vestibular
approach can also be
taken for LeFort II
fracture
CORONAL APPROACH
GLABELLA
APPROACH
 FIXATION- 3-POINT fixation
 IMMOBILISATION- MAXILLOMANDIBULAR FIXATION
 STAGE III. DEFINITIVE TREATMENT
LEFORT III FRACTURE-
 SURGICAL APPROACH-
Existing Laceration
A . Lateral eyebrow approach
B. Upper-eyelid approach
GLABELLA
APPROACH
Coronal approach -
PREAURICULAR APPROACH
REDUCTION- ROWE OR HAYTON WILLIAMS FORCEP
Zygoma hook
 FIXATION- 3-point fixation
 IMMOBILISATION- MAXILLOMANDIBULAR FIXATION if
required
Principles of Maxillary Reconstruction
 Miniplates can bridge gaps of up to approximately 0.5cms
 Gaps >0.5cms – bone grafts
 Bone grafts bridging the gap should be wedged underneath
the plate & held in place with screws fixed from plate
directly into the graft.
Immediate Bone Grafting
Buttress reinforcement retained by plates or screws can
assist in restoring maxillary height & preventing
Contour deficiencies.
 Rib graft
 Iliac crest
 Calvaria
 Mandibular bone graft
 Alloplastic bone graft
CONCLUSION:
Le fort fractures are common in the trauma patient. They
require accurate radiologic diagnosis and surgical
management to prevent severe functional debilities and
cosmetic deformity.
A thorough understanding of the anatomy, craniofacial
buttresses and treatment options will give the maxillofacial
surgeon the optimal tools for achieving a successful result.
THANK YOU
REFERENCES:
1. Rowe NL, Williams JL. Maxillofacial Injuries.
Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone,1985.
2. Oral and maxillofacial trauma : Fonseca vol. 2.
3. Marciani RD. Management of Midface
Fractures: fifty years later. J Oral Maxillofac
Surg 1993;51:962
4. www2.aofoundation.org

More Related Content

PPTX
Mid facial fractures and their management
PPTX
Midface fracture.pptx
PPTX
Mid face fractures 1 8
PPTX
Zygomatic Complex Fracture- ZMC
PPT
Diseases of salivary glands
PPTX
Odontogenic tumors ppt
PPTX
Mandibular orthognathic surgeries
Mid facial fractures and their management
Midface fracture.pptx
Mid face fractures 1 8
Zygomatic Complex Fracture- ZMC
Diseases of salivary glands
Odontogenic tumors ppt
Mandibular orthognathic surgeries

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Mandibular fracture
PPT
Mandibular Fracture.ppt
PPTX
Lefort 1 fracture
PPTX
Mandibular fractures
PDF
Le Fort Fractures
PPTX
Le fort fracture(2)
PPTX
Management of Mandibular Fractures
PPT
Genioplasty
PPTX
ZMC Fracture.pptx
PPTX
Submandibular and retromandibular approach
PPTX
Classification, clinical features of pan facial trauma
PDF
Osteomyelitis in maxillofacial region
PPTX
Oroantral Communication and Fistula
PPT
Condylar fractures
PPT
Fascial space & infections
PPTX
Management of condylar fractures
PPTX
Condylar fractures
PPTX
Kaban protocol tmj ankylosis treatment new 2009
PPTX
Maxillary Osteotomies & Associated Surgical complications
PPTX
mandibular molar Impactions
Mandibular fracture
Mandibular Fracture.ppt
Lefort 1 fracture
Mandibular fractures
Le Fort Fractures
Le fort fracture(2)
Management of Mandibular Fractures
Genioplasty
ZMC Fracture.pptx
Submandibular and retromandibular approach
Classification, clinical features of pan facial trauma
Osteomyelitis in maxillofacial region
Oroantral Communication and Fistula
Condylar fractures
Fascial space & infections
Management of condylar fractures
Condylar fractures
Kaban protocol tmj ankylosis treatment new 2009
Maxillary Osteotomies & Associated Surgical complications
mandibular molar Impactions
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Le fort fracture by Dr. Amit Suryawanshi .Dentist in Kolhapur (MDS). Oral &...
PPT
Fractures of the Midface / Orbit
PPT
Le fort fractures
PPTX
Classification of Mandible, Midface, ZMC and NOE Fractures
PPT
Middle face fracture
PPT
Maxillofacial fractures
PPT
Mid face fractures /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental acad...
PPTX
Radiographic evaluation of midface fracture
PPT
Lefort fractures /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy
PPT
Mid face fractures / /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental ac...
PPT
Lefort 2 Fracture
PPT
Lefort 1 Fracture
PPTX
Radigraphic Imaging in Maxillofacial Trauma
PPTX
Maxillofacial Trauma
PPTX
conventional radiography in maxillofacial trauma
PPT
Traumatic injuries of teeth
PPT
Maxillofacial trauma
PPTX
Zygomatic fractures
PDF
Maxillary sinus & its dental implication
PDF
BMA-2015-webb
Le fort fracture by Dr. Amit Suryawanshi .Dentist in Kolhapur (MDS). Oral &...
Fractures of the Midface / Orbit
Le fort fractures
Classification of Mandible, Midface, ZMC and NOE Fractures
Middle face fracture
Maxillofacial fractures
Mid face fractures /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental acad...
Radiographic evaluation of midface fracture
Lefort fractures /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy
Mid face fractures / /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental ac...
Lefort 2 Fracture
Lefort 1 Fracture
Radigraphic Imaging in Maxillofacial Trauma
Maxillofacial Trauma
conventional radiography in maxillofacial trauma
Traumatic injuries of teeth
Maxillofacial trauma
Zygomatic fractures
Maxillary sinus & its dental implication
BMA-2015-webb
Ad

Similar to Midface fractures (20)

PPTX
MIDDLE FACE FRACTURE. ETIOLOGY TREATMENT
DOCX
Mid facial fracture
PPTX
Midface fractures
PPTX
Lecture 2 maxillofacial trauma
PPTX
Facial bone fractures an overview
PPTX
FRACTURES OF MAXILLA AND NASO-ETHMOID COMPLEX.pptx
PPTX
Le fort fracture by Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi, Oral Surgeon, Pune
PPT
Mandibular fractures
PPTX
Naso orbito ethmoidal fracture
PPT
Orbital fractures ih
PPTX
Fractures of the Middle-third of the Facial Skeleton (1).pptx
PPTX
TMJ ANKYLOSIS of the Jaw and its clinical significancies
DOC
Orthognathic surgery-Mid face procedures
PPTX
MAXILLOFACIAL TRUMA. MANAGMENT OF MIDFACE FRACTURE
PPTX
Osteology of head & neck ii
PPTX
seminar on rhinoplasty.pptx
PPTX
seminar on rhinoplasty.pptx
PPTX
nitheesha maxillary sinus oresented.pptx
PPTX
Naso-orbito-ethmoidal fracture
PPTX
Surgical Anatomy For Orbital Procedures .pptx
MIDDLE FACE FRACTURE. ETIOLOGY TREATMENT
Mid facial fracture
Midface fractures
Lecture 2 maxillofacial trauma
Facial bone fractures an overview
FRACTURES OF MAXILLA AND NASO-ETHMOID COMPLEX.pptx
Le fort fracture by Dr. Amit T. Suryawanshi, Oral Surgeon, Pune
Mandibular fractures
Naso orbito ethmoidal fracture
Orbital fractures ih
Fractures of the Middle-third of the Facial Skeleton (1).pptx
TMJ ANKYLOSIS of the Jaw and its clinical significancies
Orthognathic surgery-Mid face procedures
MAXILLOFACIAL TRUMA. MANAGMENT OF MIDFACE FRACTURE
Osteology of head & neck ii
seminar on rhinoplasty.pptx
seminar on rhinoplasty.pptx
nitheesha maxillary sinus oresented.pptx
Naso-orbito-ethmoidal fracture
Surgical Anatomy For Orbital Procedures .pptx

Recently uploaded (20)

PPT
nephrology MRCP - Member of Royal College of Physicians ppt
PDF
Lecture on Anesthesia for ENT surgery 2025pptx.pdf
PPT
Dermatology for member of royalcollege.ppt
PPTX
09. Diabetes in Pregnancy/ gestational.pptx
PDF
OSCE SERIES ( Questions & Answers ) - Set 5.pdf
PPTX
y4d nutrition and diet in pregnancy and postpartum
PPTX
NRP and care of Newborn.pptx- APPT presentation about neonatal resuscitation ...
PDF
OSCE Series ( Questions & Answers ) - Set 6.pdf
PDF
The_EHRA_Book_of_Interventional Electrophysiology.pdf
PPT
neurology Member of Royal College of Physicians (MRCP).ppt
PDF
OSCE SERIES ( Questions & Answers ) - Set 3.pdf
PPT
Rheumatology Member of Royal College of Physicians.ppt
PPTX
HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS - Pathophysiology Notes for Second Year Pharm D St...
PDF
MNEMONICS MNEMONICS MNEMONICS MNEMONICS s
PPTX
Post Op complications in general surgery
PPTX
CARDIOVASCULAR AND RENAL DRUGS.pptx for health study
PPTX
Neoplasia III.pptxjhghgjhfj fjfhgfgdfdfsrbvhv
PPTX
Human Reproduction: Anatomy, Physiology & Clinical Insights.pptx
PDF
B C German Homoeopathy Medicineby Dr Brij Mohan Prasad
PPTX
NUCLEAR-MEDICINE-Copy.pptxbabaabahahahaahha
nephrology MRCP - Member of Royal College of Physicians ppt
Lecture on Anesthesia for ENT surgery 2025pptx.pdf
Dermatology for member of royalcollege.ppt
09. Diabetes in Pregnancy/ gestational.pptx
OSCE SERIES ( Questions & Answers ) - Set 5.pdf
y4d nutrition and diet in pregnancy and postpartum
NRP and care of Newborn.pptx- APPT presentation about neonatal resuscitation ...
OSCE Series ( Questions & Answers ) - Set 6.pdf
The_EHRA_Book_of_Interventional Electrophysiology.pdf
neurology Member of Royal College of Physicians (MRCP).ppt
OSCE SERIES ( Questions & Answers ) - Set 3.pdf
Rheumatology Member of Royal College of Physicians.ppt
HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS - Pathophysiology Notes for Second Year Pharm D St...
MNEMONICS MNEMONICS MNEMONICS MNEMONICS s
Post Op complications in general surgery
CARDIOVASCULAR AND RENAL DRUGS.pptx for health study
Neoplasia III.pptxjhghgjhfj fjfhgfgdfdfsrbvhv
Human Reproduction: Anatomy, Physiology & Clinical Insights.pptx
B C German Homoeopathy Medicineby Dr Brij Mohan Prasad
NUCLEAR-MEDICINE-Copy.pptxbabaabahahahaahha

Midface fractures

  • 1. “MID FACE FRACTURES” PRESENTED BY : DR. SAVAN CHOVATIA (MDS PART2 OMFS) AHMEDABAD DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL GUIDED BY : DR NEHA VYAS(HOD & PROFESSOR, MDS) DR NITU SHAH(PROFESSOR,MDS) DR SACHIN DALAL(PROFESSOR,MDS)
  • 2. INDEX  INTRODUCTION  BONES OF MIDFACE  ANATOMIC CONSIDIRATION  HISTORY  ETIOLOGY  CLASSIFICATION  CLINICAL FEATURES:  RADIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION  MANAGEMENT
  • 3. INTRODUCTION  Face is intimately related to self image.  Facial features depend upon underlying bony frame work. • The maxillofacial region has special importance because of its proximity to the all important brain-case as well as respiratory passages.  The maxilla represents the bridge between the cranial base superiorly and the dentition inferiorly.  Its intimate association with the oral cavity, nasal cavity, and orbits and the important structures adjacent to it make the maxilla a functionally and cosmetically important structure.  It is a region responsible for senses like vision, smell, hearing and taste and resonance of voice.
  • 4.  Fracture of these bones is potentially life-threatening as well as disfiguring.  Hence we being maxillofacial surgeons need to do systematic and timely repair of these fractures to correct deformity and prevent unfavorable sequalae.  To reconstruct the face following trauma is highly demanding and requires uncompromising care.
  • 5. WHAT IS MID FACE??  Area between a superior plane drawn through the zygomaticofrontal sutures tangential to the base of the skull and an inferior plane at the level of the maxillary dental occlusal surfaces.  These planes do not parallel each other but converge posteriorly at a level approximating that of the foramen magnum  Triangular region with its widest dimension facing anteriorly.
  • 6. BONES OF MIDFACE : Paired Bones Unpaired Bones Maxilla Vomer Zygomatic bone Ethmoid Zygomatic process of temporal bone Sphenoid (Pterygoid plates) Palatine bone Nasal bone Lacrimal bone Inferior conchae (17 BONES)
  • 7. Anatomical specimen showing the disarticulated bones of the skull exploded and mounted to demonstrate their complex interrelationship.
  • 8.  These facial bones in isolation are comparatively fragile but gain strength and support as they articulate with each other.  It is this strength gained from each other that has been described as the facial buttress by Manson. • Area of strength • Vertical and horizontal pillars • Muscular attachment • Area of weakness • Sutures • Lining tissues and air-filled cavities MECHANISM OF MIDFACE FRACTURE :
  • 9. Vertical buttress:  nasomaxillary  zygomaticomaxillary  pterygomaxillary Horizontal buttress:  frontal bar(supra orbital rims)  infra orbital rims  maxillary palate
  • 11. Vertical and horizontal pillars: Midface is admirably equipped to withstand forces in inferior superior directions. Poorly constructed to withstand lateral and frontal forces. 11
  • 12. ANATOMICAL CONSIDERATIONS: ∏ This structure is analogous to a matchbox sitting below and anterior to hard shell containing brain ∏ Act as cushion for trauma directed towards cranium from anterior or antero- lateral direction
  • 13. MAXILLA  The maxilla consists of a central body and four processes namely the frontal, zygomatic, alveolar and palatine process. The body is hollowed out and contains the maxillary sinus.  It is pyramidal shaped with the base being the medial surface facing the nasal cavity and the apex being elongated into the zygomatic process. It has an orbital or superior surface which forms the floor and rim of the orbit, a malar or anterolateral surface which forms part of the cheek and a posterolateral or infratemporal surface which contributes to the infratemporal fossa. The base is rimmed inferiorly by the alveolar process.
  • 14.  The alveolar process houses the dental arch with the sockets varying in size according to the teeth. The palatine process is a horizontal process and medially articulates with the palatine process of the opposite maxilla which posteriorly it articulates with the horizontal plate of the palatine bone.  The zygomatic process is an extension of the anterolateral surface of the body which contributes to the zygomaticomaxillary suture.  The frontal process projects upward to articulate with the maxillary process of the frontal bone as well as the nasal bone anteriorly and the lacrimal bone posteriorly.  It encloses a cavity maxillary sinus.
  • 15. ZYGOMA  The name zygoma is derived from the word meaning a yoke (i.e. a structure that connects various parts together).  It is often described as a diamond or pyramidal shaped bone  The posterior surface contributes to the temporal fossa.  Projecting superiorly is the frontal process which articulates with the zygomatic process of the frontal bone in front and greater wing of sphenoid behind to form the lateral wall and rim of the orbit.  Posterolaterally the temporal process articulates with the zygomatic process of the temporal bone to form the zygomatic arch.  Inferiorly and it broadly articulates with the maxilla to form the inferior orbital rim and contributes to the orbital floor as well as the zygomaticomaxillary buttress
  • 16. NASAL BONES The paired quadrilateral bones form the upper part of the bridge of the nose and articulate with the frontal process of the maxilla laterally and with each other in the midline. Superiorly they articulate with the frontal bone.
  • 17. LACRIMAL BONES  Each lacrimal bone is irregularly rectangular forming part of the medial wall of the orbit.  They articulate posteriorly with the paper thin (lamina papyracea) part of the ethmoid, superiorly with the frontal bone and inferiorly with the body of the maxilla.  The sharp orbital vertical lacrimal crest continues inferiorly to form the lacrimal hamulus, with its concave portion housing the lacrimal sac.
  • 18.  The first clinical examination of a maxillary fracture was recorded in 2500 BC.  In 1822 Charles Fredrick William Reiche provided the first detailed description of maxillary fractures.  In 1823 Carl Ferdinand van Graefe described the use of a head frame for treating a maxillary fracture. HISTORY :
  • 19.  In 1901 , Rene Le Fort published his landmark work, a three-part experiment using 32 cadavers.  The heads of the cadavers were subjected to low velocity forces; the soft tissue were then removed and the bones were examined. HISTORY:
  • 20.  Le Fort noted that generally face was fractured and the skull was not. He then stated that fractures occurred through three weak lines in the facial bony structure. From these three lines the Le Fort classification system was developed. HISTORY
  • 21. External Fixation Craniomaxillary fixation- Wassmund’s(1927) maxillary splint with side bars attached to a head cap
  • 22. ETIOLOGY: ∏ Assault ∏ RTA ∏ Alcohol and Drug abuse ∏ Gunshot wounds ∏ Sports ∏ Falls ∏ Industrial accidents
  • 23. Classification 1. ALPHONSO GUERIN(1886) 2. RENE LE FORT FRACTURE CLASSIFICATION (1901) 3. ROWE AND WILLIAM CLASSIFICATION (1985) 4. MODIFIED LE FORT CLASSIFICATION (MARCIANI,1993) 5. ERICH’S CLASSIFICATION (1942)
  • 24.  •Le Fort I  •Le Fort II  •Le Fort III Le Fort classification: 1) Rene Le Fort classification (1901):
  • 25. 3. Rowe & william’s classification :  A – FRACTURES NOT INVOLVING DENTOALVEOLAR COMPONENTS 1. Central region a- fracture of nasal bone &/or nasal septum - lateral nasal injuries - anterior nasal injuries b- fractures of frontal process of maxilla c- fractures of type a & b which extend into ethmoid bone d- fractures of type a ,b ,c which extends into frontal bone 2.Lateral region- Fractures involving zygomatic bone,arch & maxilla excluding dentoalveolar component
  • 26.  B –FRACTURES INVOLVING DENTOALVEOLAR COMPONENT 1.Central region a-dentoalveolar fractures b-lefort I (subzygomatic fractures) 2.Combined central & lateral region a-high level b-LeFort III with midline split c-LeFort III with midline split + fracture of roof of orbit or frontal bone
  • 27. Limitations of the lefort classification • The LeFort classification has proven to be less satisfactory to describe more complex fracture patterns, comminuted, incomplete, combination maxillary fractures or to describe fractures of the part bearing the occlusal segment.
  • 28. 2) Marciani modification of Le Fort:  LE FORT I: LOW MAXILLARY FRACTURE  Le Fort I (a)Le fort I -multiple segment  LE FORT II:PYRAMIDAL FRACTURE  Le Fort II (a) : le fort II + nasal  Le Fort II (b) : le fort II (a) + ethmoid  LE FORT III: CRANIOFACIAL DYSJUNSTION  Le Fort III (a) : Le Fort III + nasal fracture  Le Fort III (b) : Le Fort III (a) + ethmoid  LE FORT IV: LE FORT II OR LE FORT III WITH CRANIAL BASE  Le Fort IV (a) : Le Fort IV with supraorbital rim  Le Fort IV (b) : Le Fort IV + anterior cranial base  Le Fort IV (c) : Le Fort IV (b) + le fort IV(a)
  • 29. PREVALENCE OF MID-FACE FRACTURES Fracture Type Prevalence Zygomaticomaxillary complex (tripod fracture) 40 % LeFort I 15 % II 10 % III 10 % Zygomatic arch 10 % Alveolar process of maxilla 5 % Smash fractures 5 % Other 5 %
  • 30.  Erich’s classification (1942)  Horizontal, pyramidal, transverse  Classification based on relationship of fracture line to zygomatic bone  Subzygomatic, suprazygomatic  Classification based on level of fracture line  Low, mid, high level fractures
  • 32.  Handrickson M, Clark n, Manson P,Palatal fracture classification, patterns and Treatment with rigid internal fixation:. Plast recostr surg 101(2):319-332,1998 TYPE 1: Anterior alveolus Type 2: posterolateral Type 3: sagittal Type 4: parasagittal Type 5: ParaAlveolar Type 6: Complex/comminuted Type 7: transverse
  • 34. A violent force applied over a more extensive are, above the level of the teeth will result in a Le Fort I Fracture. Which is not confined to smaller section of the alveolar bone Low-level fracture, a subzygomatic Fracture. Guerin’s fracture Horizontal fracture Floating fracture
  • 36. LEFORT 1 : Fracture line:  I st line : starts from the lateral border of the pyriform aperture passes above the nasal floor, then it goes posteriorly above the canine fossa going backward below the zygomatic butress coming on the posterior wall of the maxilla, where it rises abruptly crossing the pterygo-maxillary fissure & breaks the pterygoid plates in lower1/3 & upper 2/3 parts.  2nd line : starts from same starting point and also passes along the lateral wall of nose and subsequently joins the lateral line of # behind the tuberosity.  3rd line : detaches the nasal septum from anterior nasal spine upto vomer bone.
  • 37.  A typical Lefort-I fracture is always bilateral with the fracture of lower third of nasal septum.  It can also occur as unilateral fracture.  Lefort-I may occur as a single entity or in association with Lefort-II & III #.
  • 39. LEFORT II  Pyramidal fracture or subzygomatic fracture  Violent force, usually from an anterior direction, sustained by the central region of the middle third of the facial skeleton over an area extending from the glabella to the alveolar margin results in a fracture of a pyramid shape.  The force may be delivered at the level of the nasal bones.
  • 40. FRACTURE LINE  it starts just below the frontonasal suture bilaterally  Runs from the thin middle area of the nasal bones down either side.  Crossing the frontal processes of the maxillae into the medial wall of each orbit.  Within each orbit, the fracture line crosses the lacrimal bone behind the lacrimal sac.
  • 41.  Before turning forwards to cross the infra- orbital margin slightly medial to or through the infra-orbital foramen.  The fracture now extends downwards and backwards across the lateral wall of the antrum below the zygomatic-maxillary suture.  Divides the pterygoid lamina about halfway up.
  • 42. LE FORT 2: Fracture Line
  • 44. LEFORT III  Suprazygomatic or transverse fracture or high level fracture.  The line of fracture extends above the zygomatic bones on the both sides as a result of trauma being inflicted over a wider area, at the orbital level.
  • 45. Mechanism of LF3 #:  Initial impact is taken by the zygomatic bone resulting in depressed fracture.  Then because of the severe degree of the impact, the entire middle third will then hinge about the fragile ethmoid bone.  The impact will then be transmitted on the contralateral side resulting laterally displaced zygomatic fracture of the opposite side.
  • 46. THE FRACTURE LINE  Runs from near the frontonasal suture transversely backwards, parallel with the base of the skull and involves the full depth of the ethmoid bone, including the cribriform plate.  Within the orbit, the fracture passes below the optic foramen into the posterior limit of the inferior orbital fissure.
  • 47.  From the base of the inferior orbital fissure the fracture line extends in two directions:  Backwards across the pterygo-maxillary fissure to fracture the roots of the pterygoid laminae.  Laterally across the lateral wall of the orbit separating the zygomatic bone from the frontal bone by fronto-zygomatic suture.  The entire mid-facial skeleton becomes detached from the cranial base. FZ SUTUTE # Zygomatic arch#
  • 48. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF MIDFACE FRACTURES  Extra-oral & Intra-oral examination.  Inspection.  Palpation.
  • 49. Extra-oral examination Inspection of midface-  Swelling & Facial Asymmetry.  Bruising of upper lip and lower half of mid-face.  Circum-orbital Ecchymosis ( bilateral = Racoon’s eye).  Subconjunctival Hemorrhage.  Periorbital Oedema.
  • 50.  Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea  Lengthening of Midface  Depressed midface (dish face)  Saddle shaped depression of nose  Enophthalmos  Proptosis  Diplopia
  • 51.  Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhoea -Watery nasal or postnasal salty discharge. CSF content assessment- most reliable ß2 Transferrin isoenzyme- most diagnostic (pathognomonic of CSF) “HALO” sign
  • 52. Palpation - 1. Subcutaneous Emphysema – Crepitus 2. Tenderness 3. Step Deformity 4. Abnormal Mobility of bone 5. Impairment of sensation
  • 54. Intra-oral examination Inspection 1. Disturbed occlusion (posterior occlusal gagging , open bite) 2. Haematoma intraorally over root of zygoma 3. Haematoma in palate (Guiren’s sign) 4. Fractured cusps of teeth 5. Midline diastema
  • 56.  Inspection :  Slight swelling and edema of the lower part of the face along with the upper lip swelling  Ecchymosis in the labial and buccal vestibule, as well as contusion of the skin of the upper lip may be seen  Bilateral nasal epistaxis may be observed
  • 57.  The patient may develop open bite if the fractured segment is mobile , due to posterior gagging of occlusion.  Sometimes fracture of the palate can also be associated with Le Fort I fracture.
  • 58.  Occlusion may be disturbed, difficult mastication  Pain while speaking and moving the jaw • GUERIN sign: ecchymosis of palate , bilateral greater palatine foramen.
  • 59. PALPATION :  In Le Fort I, the teeth and maxilla are mobile (floating maxilla), but the nose and upper face is fixed.  Sometimes there will be upward displacement of the entire fragment, locking it against the superior intact structures, such a fracture is called as impacted or telescopic fracture.  Percussion of the maxillary teeth results in distinctive 'cracked-pot sound',  No tenderness and mobility of the zygomatic arch and bones.
  • 60.  Gross edema of soft tissue  Bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis  Bilateral subconjunctival hemorrahge  Obvious deformity of the nose  Nasal bleeding and obstruction  CSF leak rhinorrhea  Dish-face deformity  Limitation of ocular movement  Possible diplopia and enophthalmous  Retropostioning of the maxilla with anterior open bite  Lengthening of the face  Difficulty in mouth opening  Mobility of the upper jaw  Occasional hematoma of the palate  Cracked-pot sound on percussion Common features of LF2&3:
  • 61. SPECIFIC FEATURE OF LF2#:  Step deformity at infra-orbiatal margin  Anasthesia of midface  Nasal bone moves with mid-face as a whole SPECIFIC FEATURE OF LF3#:  Tenderness and sepration at FZ suture  Tenderness and deformity of zygomatic arch  Depression of occular level and pseudoptosis
  • 63. Clinical features -  The resulting gross edema of the middle third gives an appearance of "moon face" to the patient. • Depressed nasal bridge, • Dish shape deformity.
  • 64.  CSF rhinorrhoea is possible and should be looked for.  Bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis giving an appearance of 'raccoon eyes' is invariably seen in the fractures of both Le Fort II and Le Fort III.  Subconjunctival hemorrhage develops rapidly in the area adjacent to the site of injury.(mostly in medial half )
  • 65.  Diplopia may be seen in cases of orbital floor injury.  Pupils are at level unless there is gross unilateral enophthalmos.  Anaesthesia or paraesthesia of the cheek as a result of injury to the infraorbital nerve due to the fracture of the inferior orbital rim.
  • 66.  On intraoral examination, retropositioning of the whole maxilla and gagging of the occlusion are seen.  Hematoma formation is seen in the buccal sulcus opposite to the maxillary first and second molar teeth as a result of fracture of the zygomatic buttress.
  • 67.  Step deformity at the infraorbital rims or frontonasal junction is noticed.  Orbital wall fractures can cause entrapment with limitation of ocular movement. Extraoral palpation of LFII:
  • 68.  When maxillary teeth are grasped, the mid-facial skeleton moves as a pyramid and the movement can be detected at the infraorbital margin and the nasal bridge.
  • 70. LE FORT III FRACTURE Clinical features -  Gross oedema of the face.  Bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis with subconjunctival hemorrhage.  Characteristic 'dish face' appearance with lengthening of the face.
  • 71.  'Hooding of eyes' may be seen due to separation of the frontozygomatic suture.  Deformity of the zygomatic arches.  Difficulty in opening the mouth, inability to move lower jaw.  CSF rhinorrhoea.  Depression of ocular levels.  ‘Battle’s Sign’
  • 72.  Tenderness and often separation of the bones at the frontozygomatic suture.  Mobility of the whole of facial skeleton as a single unit.  When lateral displacement has taken place tilting of the occlusal plane and gagging of one side is seen.
  • 73. Radiographic Examination : 1. plain Radiograph  Min 2 radiograph  90* to eachother 2. CT SCAN  Coronal and axial view  3d reconstruction
  • 74.  Opg  Lateral view  15/30 degrees occipitomental view  Submentovertex view  Cranial postero anterior view.  PA view (Water’s View)
  • 75. 30 DEGREE SUBMENTO VERTEX (NORMAL) LATERAL VIEW
  • 77. Coronal CT demonstrating a right Le Fort I fracture and a left Le Fort II fracture. CT - SCAN
  • 79. LEFORT I – Waters view
  • 81. Pterygoid Plate Fractures in lefort I CT findings - axial section
  • 85. CT findings - coronal section
  • 86. The blue arrows show bilateral fracture of the pterygoid processes, which is a common association in all three types of Le Fort fractures. CT findings - axial section
  • 87. Middle age man in motor vehicle accident. Fracture lines are demonstrated in red arrows.
  • 88. Three-dimensional reconstruction of a patient with right Le Fort I fracture and a left Le Fort II fracture 3D - CT
  • 91. 32-year-old man, driver in a motor vehicle accident. .
  • 94. 1. Emergency care & Stabilization - ( First aid and resuscitation ) 2. Initial Assessment and Early care- 3. Definitive Treatment- 4. Rehabilitation -
  • 95. STAGE I - Emergency care & Stabilization 1. Maintenance of airway. 2. Control of hemorrhage. 3. Prevent or control shock. 4. C-Spine stabilization. 5. Control of life-threatening injuries. Head injuries, chest injuries, compound limb fractures, intra abdominal bleeding.
  • 97. Emergency Care A) Airway Maintainance - Existence & identification of obstruction. Manually clear fractured teeth, blood clots, dentures. Endotracheal intubation if needed. NOTE:  Altered level of consciousness is the most common cause of upper airway obstruction.
  • 98. B) Breathing and ventilation  Airway patency alone does not ensure adequate ventilation  Adequate gas exchange is required to maximize oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination  Ventilation requires adequate function of the lungs, chest wall, and diaphragm
  • 99. C) Circulation & hemorrhage control  Hemorrhage is most common cause of shock after injury.  Multiple injury patients have hypovolemia.  Monitor vital signs closely.  Goal is to restore organ perfusion.
  • 100. Treatment of Blood Loss & Shock  External bleeding controlled by direct pressure over bleeding site.  Gain prompt access to vascular system with IV catheters.  Fluid replacement: Ringer’s Lactate Normal saline Transfusion.
  • 101. D) DISABILITY (NEUROLOGICEVALUATION)  A rapid neurologic evaluation is performed at the end of the primary survey  The Glassgow Comma Scale (GCS) is a quick, simple method for determining the level of consciousness
  • 102. PATIENT SCORE DETERMINES CATEGORY OF NEUROLOGIC IMPAIR SCORE >15 = NORMAL 13-14= MILD INJURY 9-12 = MODERATE INJURY 3-8 = SEVERE INJURY
  • 103. E) EXPOSURE ANDENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL  The patient should be completely undressed  usually by cutting off his or her garments to facilitate a thorough examination and assessment The patient’s body temperature is more important than the comfort of the healthcare providers.
  • 104. Stabilization of associated injuries  C-spine injury is primary concern with all maxillofacial trauma victims. Signs/symptoms of C-Spine injury Neurologic deficit. Neck pain.
  • 105. Stabilization of associated injuries  C-spine injury suspected: Avoid any movement of neck Establish & maintain proper immobilization until vertebral fractures or spinal cord injuries ruled out Lateral C-spine radiographs CT of C-spine Neurologic exam
  • 106. STAGE II. Initial Assessment and Early care  Emergency care has stabilized patient.  Initial stabilization of fractures.  Debridement & dressing of soft tissues.  Physical exam & history.  Laboratory tests.  Clinical & Radiographic Assessment of Patient. Diagnosis of maxillofacial injuries.  Pre-operative planning.
  • 107. STAGE II. Initial Assessment  Pre-operative planning 1. Need for Tracheostomy 2. Surgical Approaches to Midface 3. Whether ‘Open’ or ‘Closed’ methods of reduction are to be employed. 4. Necessity for & type of Maxillary fracture Fixation.
  • 108. STAGE II. Initial Assessment  Pre-operative planning  Surgical Approaches to Midface
  • 109. Pre-operative planning  Principle of treatment for Mid face #:  CONSERVATIVE  OPERATIVE/SURGICAL: REDUCTION and FIXATION
  • 110.  Indications for Closed Reduction:  Non displaced fracture,  Grossly comminuted fractures,  Fractures exposed by significant loss of overlying soft tissues,  Edentulous maxillary fractures,  In children with developing dentition.  Indications for open reduction:  Displaced fractures,  Multiple fractures of the facial bones,  Fractures of the edentulous maxilla with severe displacement,  Delay of treatment and interposition of soft tissues between non-contacting displaced fracture segments, Specific systemic conditions contraindicating IMF.
  • 111. 1. Supraorbital eyebrow incision (Lefort III) 2. Subciliary incision (LeFort II & III) 3. Median lower lid (LeFort II & III) 4. Infraorbital incision (LeFort II & III) 5. Transconjunctival (LeFort II ) 6. Zygomatic arch 7. Transverse nasal (LeFort II & III) 8. Vertical nasal incision (LeFort II & III) 9. Medial orbital incision. 10. Intra-oral vestibular incision. (LeFort I) Incisions for exposure of LeFort fractures
  • 112. Classification of methods of Maxillary Fracture Fixation A ) Internal Fixation- 1. Suspension Wires 2. Direct Osteosynthesis B) External Fixation- 1. Craniomandibular 2. Craniomaxillary
  • 113. Internal Fixation Suspension Wires – non-rigid osteosynthesis - i. Frontal-central or laterally placed ii. Circumzygomatic iii. Zygomatic iv. Circumpalatal/palatal screw v. Infraorbital vi. Piriform Aperture vii. Peralveolar
  • 114. Internal Fixation Suspension Wires- Circumzygomatic wiring by Obwegeser.
  • 116. Internal Fixation Suspension Wires- Orbital rim wiring
  • 118. Type of Suspension Wire Type of Le Fort Fracture 1. Frontal a. Central Le Fort III & II b. Lateral Le Fort III & II 2. Circumzygomatic Le Fort I & II 3. Zygomatic Le Fort I 4. Infraorbital Le Fort I 5. Piriform Aperture Le Fort I Summary of Suspension wiring according to fracture site
  • 119. Disadvantages of Suspension Wiring  Incomplete fixation of fractured fragments  Insufficient visualization of fractures by closed reduction  Compression against the cranial base  No 3-dimensional stability  Patients dislike intra-oral splints as it hinders oral hygiene maintainence.
  • 120. Internal Fixation Direct Osteosynthesis - 1. Interosseous Wires. 2. Plates and Screws.
  • 121. Direct osteosynthesis Intraosseous Wires- 1. Maxillary (Lefort –I ) 2. Zygomaticomaxillary (Lefort –II) 3. Frontonasal (LeFort –II &III) 4. Zygomaticofrontal (Lefort III) 5. Zygomatic bone (comminuted)
  • 122. Disadvantages -  Non rigid type of osteosynthesis  No 3 dimensional stability, it provides only monoplane traction.  IMF is always needed  Interfragmentary pressure can not be controlled.  Under functional stress, wire loses rigidity, direction control and surface contact.  Delayed healing because of micromovement at fracture site.
  • 123. Direct osteosynthesis- 2. Plates & Screws for midface fractures -  Stainless steel mini-plating system  Titanium mini-plating system  Vitallium, Cobalt chromium, molybdenum alloy plates  Bioresorbable plating system.
  • 124. Miniplates and screws These are monocortical, semi-rigid fixation device which provide 3D stability. Designs: X, H, L, T, Y Thickness:0.6-1 mm Type of metals: Stainless steel, Titanium, Vitallium Advantages:Easily adaptable, Monocortical, Functional stability, Reduced surgical access
  • 125. Micro plates Harle & duker(1975;Luhr(1979) 0.3 – 0.6 mm Used for : FN region ,Frontal bone,Frontal process of maxilla Sites of application:Linear/T/Y plate at FN region,Long curve plate for frontal process of maxilla or frontal bone Mesh fixation Used for retention and alignment of small fragments or bone grafts. Sites of application: Anterior and lateral wall of maxilla and Anterior table of frontal bone
  • 126. Bone plate osteosynthesis Advantages – 1. Simple & less intraoperative time 2. Intraoral approach is sufficient 3. Postoperative IMF is not needed or period of IMF is reduced. 4. Three dimensional stability and early return of function.
  • 127.  STAGE III. DEFINITIVE TREATMENT  LEFORT I FRACTURE  LEFORT II FRACTURE  LEFORT III FRACTURE
  • 128.  STAGE III. DEFINITIVE TREATMENT LEFORT I FRACTURE SURGICAL APPROACH- MAXILLARY VESTIBULAR 1. 2. 3. 4.
  • 129. REDUCTION- ROWE OR HAYTON WILLIAMS FORCEP
  • 130. FIXATION- 4-point fixation with MINIPLATE.
  • 132. LEFORT II FRACTURE  SURGICAL APPROACH- A – Subciliary incision B – Sub tarsal incision C - Infraorbital incision D - Extension of Subciliary incision
  • 133. Existing Laceration Maxillary vestibular approach can also be taken for LeFort II fracture
  • 137.  STAGE III. DEFINITIVE TREATMENT LEFORT III FRACTURE-  SURGICAL APPROACH- Existing Laceration
  • 138. A . Lateral eyebrow approach B. Upper-eyelid approach GLABELLA APPROACH
  • 140. REDUCTION- ROWE OR HAYTON WILLIAMS FORCEP
  • 143.  IMMOBILISATION- MAXILLOMANDIBULAR FIXATION if required
  • 144. Principles of Maxillary Reconstruction  Miniplates can bridge gaps of up to approximately 0.5cms  Gaps >0.5cms – bone grafts  Bone grafts bridging the gap should be wedged underneath the plate & held in place with screws fixed from plate directly into the graft.
  • 145. Immediate Bone Grafting Buttress reinforcement retained by plates or screws can assist in restoring maxillary height & preventing Contour deficiencies.  Rib graft  Iliac crest  Calvaria  Mandibular bone graft  Alloplastic bone graft
  • 146. CONCLUSION: Le fort fractures are common in the trauma patient. They require accurate radiologic diagnosis and surgical management to prevent severe functional debilities and cosmetic deformity. A thorough understanding of the anatomy, craniofacial buttresses and treatment options will give the maxillofacial surgeon the optimal tools for achieving a successful result. THANK YOU
  • 147. REFERENCES: 1. Rowe NL, Williams JL. Maxillofacial Injuries. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone,1985. 2. Oral and maxillofacial trauma : Fonseca vol. 2. 3. Marciani RD. Management of Midface Fractures: fifty years later. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:962 4. www2.aofoundation.org

Editor's Notes

  • #2: Fractrure of maxilla and its associated bones commonly referred to as fracture of middle third.
  • #8: Each individual facial bone has comparatively less strenghth. It gains strength by articulating with each other. In case of extensive facial trauma also blood supply remains intact, Because of most of the facial bones are clothed in mucosa, And periosteal blood supply remains intact.
  • #10: The vertical pillars are formed firstly medially by the piriform rims which continue superiorly as the frontal process of the maxilla. Secondly the zygomatic buttresses which continue superiorly with the lateral orbital rims form the lateral pillars. The most caudal pillars are the pterygoid plates The horizontal pillars are formed by the frontal bar (composed of the supraorbital rims and nasal process of the frontal bone), the zygomatic arch, infraorbital rims, and the nasal bridge and finally the alveolar process of the maxilla.
  • #11: This buttresses transmits occlusal stress from the alveolar processes to the skull base.
  • #14: 2nd largest bone of face Two maxilla forms most part of the middle 3rd It contributes in formation of 1.Face 2.Nose 3.Orbit 4. Mouth 5. Infratemporal fossa 6. Pterygopalatine fossa 1 body 4 processes
  • #15: 2 in number Largest of the paranasal sinuses Communicate with other sinuses through the lateral wall of the nose The average dimensions of the sinus are approximately 3.5 anterioposteriorly 3.2cm height and 2.5cm width Volume -15 to 30ml Function decrese Wt of the skull increase the resonance of voice Humidifying and heating of inhaled air
  • #16: Also known as malar bone It plays important role in maintaining shape of the face & cheek. it articulates with the temporal, maxillary, frontal and sphenoid bones. its lateral surface is convex forming the prominence of the cheek.
  • #35: The horizontal fracture line is seen above the apices of the teeth, which detaches the tooth bearing portion of the maxilla from the rest of the facial skeleton.
  • #40: Separation of the block from the base of the skull is completed vie the nasal septum and may involve the floor of the anterior cranial fossa.
  • #44: It also known as cranio facial dysjunction. Supra zygomatic Transverse or High level fracture.
  • #45: The force is usually applied from the lateral direction with a severe impact. Many of time lefort 3 fracture seen in combination with lefoer 1 & 2 or cranial base fracture.
  • #50: SWELLING After a facial injury, inflammatory exudates accumulates to protect the injured tissue. Thus facial asymmetry occurs.. and The area becomes inflamed with pain, tenderness and redness. BRUISING its a discoloration or also called “contusion,” appears on the skin due to trauma. Its a type of hematoma. The injury causes tiny blood vessels called capillaries to burst. The blood gets trapped below the skin or mucosal surface.(treatment cold application compression) CIRCUMORBITAL ECCHYMOSIS bleeding that occurs due to fractured bones escapes in the subcutaneous plane it produces circumorbital ecchymosis. If it travels in the subperiosteal plane then subconjunctival haemorrhage occurs which is bright red in colour. PERIORBITAL OEDEMA due to accumulation of inflammatory exudates around eyes.
  • #51: (CSF) RHINORRHOEA occurs when there is a fistula between the dura and the skull base and discharge of CSF from the nose. it occurs due to fracture of ethmoid, sphenoid, frontal, or fracture of anterior skull base. LENGHTHENING OF MIDFACE occurs due to complete separation of midface to the skull base. Also knoen as DONKEY FACE appearance. In DISH FACE deformity face appears concave due to separation of fronto-zygomatic suture and depreesed nasal bones. ENOPHTHALMUS posterior displacement of eyeballwithin the orbit due to changws in volume of the orbital contents due to fracture of orbital bones. PROPTOSIS is a outward displacement of eyeball within the orbit due to retrobulbar hematoma. DIPLOPIA it is also known as double vision. Occurs due to entrapment of intra-ocular muscles.
  • #52: It is not found in blood, mucous, or tear Characteristics of normal spinal fluid are below: [1, 2] Total volume: 150 mL                                      Color: Colorless, clear, like water Opening pressure - 90-180 mm H 2O (with patient lying in lateral position)                  Osmolarity at 37°C: 281 mOsm/L Specific gravity: 1.006 to 1.008 Acid-base balance:                                                            pH: 7.28-7.32                                                 Pco2: 47.9 mm Hg                                           HCO3-: 22.9 mEq/L                                          Sodium: 135-150 mmol/L                                                 Potassium: 2.7-3.9 mmol/L                                                        Chloride: 116-127 mmol/L                                                          Calcium: 2.0-2.5 mEq/L (4.0 to 5.0 mg/dL)                                   Magnesium: 2.0-2.5 mEq/L (2.4 to 3.1 mg/dL)                               Lactic acid: 1.1-2.8 mmol/L                                                        Lactate dehydrogenase: Absolute activity depends on testing method; approximately 10% of serum value                                       Glucose: 45-80 mg/dL                                                     Glutamine - 8-18 mg/dL Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) - <2.0-7.2 U/mL Proteins: 20-40 mg/dLAt different levels of spinal tap:      Lumbar: 20-40 mg/dL                 Cisternal: 15-25 mg/dL Ventricular: 15-10 mg/dL   Normal CSF proteins concentration in children: Up to 6 days of age: 70 mg/dL Up to 4 years of age: 24 mg/dL Electrophoretic separation of spinal fluid proteins (% of total protein concentrations)Prealbumin: 2-7% Albumin: 56-76% a1-Globulin: 2-7% a 2-Globulin: 3.5-12% b-and g-globulin: 8-18% g-Globulin: 7-12% Oligoclonal bands - absent ImmunoglobulinsIgG: 10-40 mg/L IgA: 0-0.2 mg/L IgM: 0-0.6 mg/L k/l ratio: 1 Erythrocyte count:Newborn: 0-675/mm3 Adult: 0-10/mm3 Leukocyte count: Children: Younger than 1 year: 0-30/mm3 Age 1-4 years: 0-20/mm3 Age 5 years to puberty: 0-10/mm3 Adult: 0-5/mm 3 Antibodies, viral DNA – None Bacteria (Gram stain, culture, VDRL) – Negative Cancerous cells – None Cryptococcal antigen – None
  • #53: Subcutaneous Emphysema – occurs when gas or air trapped under the skin. In lefort fracture it occurs due to sinus wall fracture. Impairment of sensation – occurs due to nerve injury mostly seen in lefort 2 fracture due to injury to infraorbital nerve.
  • #55: Guiren’s sign – it is a ecchymosis seen in posterior palate due to greater palatine vessels. Fractured cusps – mostly seen in impacted type of fracture, occurs when blow to chin in superior direction. Midline diastema – occurs due to midline split type of palatal fracture.
  • #56: After local trauma, red blood cells are phagocytosed and degraded by macrophages. The blue-red color is produced by the enzymatic conversion of hemoglobin into bilirubin, which is more blue-green. The bilirubin is then converted into hemosiderin, a golden brown color, which accounts for the color changes of the bruise.[3] Hematomas can be subdivided by size. By definition, ecchymoses are 1 to 2 cm in size or larger, and are therefore larger than petechiae (1–2 mm or less) or pigmented purpuric dermatosis (0.3 to 1 mm).[3] Hematomas also have a more diffuse border than other purpura.[4] Generally speaking, dermatologists prefer to differentiate between purpurae, petechiae, and ecchymoses as descriptive technical terms. Other specialties such as internal medicine will frequently call all of these ecchymoses, because the finer distinction is not relevant in the particular case.
  • #57: of epistaxis occur in the anterior part of the nose, with the bleeding usually arising from the rich arterial anastomoses of the nasal septum (Kiesselbach’s plexus). Posterior epistaxis generally arises from the posterior nasal cavity via branches of the sphenopalatine arteries.
  • #58: due to the medial and inferior traction of the medial and lateral pterygoid on the mobile maxillary fragment.
  • #65: Traumatic CSF leaks usually result from tears in the dura at the skull base that allow CSF to escapefrom the subarachnoid space into the nasopharynx, the paranasal sinuses, or subcutaneously. The floorof the anterior cranial fossa, particularly the cribriformplate area, is thin, and the dura at this site firmlyinvests the olfactory fissure where the olfactory nerve penetrates the skull.
  • #66: Most cases of epistaxis occur in the anterior part of the nose, with the bleeding usually arising from the rich arterial anastomoses of the nasal septum (Kiesselbach’s plexus). Posterior epistaxis generally arises from the posterior nasal cavity via branches of the sphenopalatine arteries.8 Such bleeding usually occurs behind the posterior portion of the middle turbinate or at the posterior superior roof of the nasal cavity. The vast majority of nose bleeds occur in the anterior (front) part of the nose from the nasal septum. This area is richly endowed with blood vessels (Kiesselbach's plexus). This region is also known asLittle's area. Bleeding farther back in the nose is known as a posterior bleed and is usually due to bleeding from Woodruff's plexus,a venous plexus situated in the posterior part of inferior meatus.[6]Posterior bleeds are often prolonged and difficult to control. They can be associated with bleeding from both nostrils and with a greater flow of blood into the mouth.[7]
  • #76: Submento vertex also known as “JUG HANDLE VIEW” Important in assessment of zygomatic arch and mandible body fracture Lateral view is important in assessment of lefort fractures, orbital fractures, condyle, angle, body and coronoid process fractures
  • #77: This view is important to rule out facial fractures. MAXILLA MAXILARRY SINUS ZYGOMA ZYGOMATIC ARCH NASAL ORBITAL RIMS If this lines bilaterally symmetrical then it is considered as normal , but if they are not symmetrical, brich or discontinuity is there then fracture is suspected.
  • #82: PTERYGOID PLATE FRACTURE IS SEEN IN ALL LEFORT FRACTURES.
  • #88: Fracture of pterygoid plates are present in all type of LeFort fractures. H = Hemosinus
  • #91: BLOW OUT FRACTURE … TEAR DROP SIGN SEEN DUE TO ENTRAPEMENT OF ORBITAL CONTENTS IN THE MAXI. SINUS
  • #92: Blue arrows define LeFort II fracture. Red arrows define the LeFort III fracture
  • #95: Preparation for a trauma patient occurs in two different phases PREHOSPITAl PHASE it includes coordination with experienced prehospital agencies & team work to transfer the trauma patient to trauma centre. & to provide primary care. Inform to the hospital is equally important HOSPITAL PHASE Advance planning for the trauma patient’s arrival is essential. A resuscitation area should be available for trauma patients. Properly functioning airway equipment (e.g., laryngoscopes and tubes) should be organized, tested, and strategically placed where it is immediately accessible.
  • #98: The airway should be assessed first in any trauma. Initially, the chin-lift or jaw-thrust maneuver is recommended to achieve airway patency If the patient is able to communicate verbally, then the airway is not likely to be obstruct.
  • #99: The patient’s neck and chest should be exposed to adequately assess position of the trachea, and chest wall excursion. Visual inspection and palpation can detect injuries to the chest Auscultation should be performed to ensure gas flow in the lungs
  • #100: Definitive bleeding control is essential along with appropriate replacement of intravascular volume Initially circulation can be determined by following points Level of consciousness When circulating blood volume is reduced, cerebral perfusion may be critically impaired, resulting in altered levels of consciousness skin colour the patient with hypovolemia may have ashen, gray facial skin and pale extremities. Pulse A rapid, thready pulse is typically a sign of hypovolemia, but the condition may have other causes.
  • #101: A minimum of two large-caliber intravenous (IV) catheters should be introduced. At the time of IV insertion, blood should be drawn for type and crossmatch and baseline hematologic studies A bolus of 1 to 2 L of an isotonic solution may be required to achieve an appropriate response in the adult patient. All IV solutions should be warmed either by storage in a warm environment (i.e., 37°C to 40°C, or 98.6°F to 104°F) or fluid-warming devices
  • #103: GCS below 13 patients requires definite care Those patients should be immediately transferred to the ADVANCED TRAUMA CENTER.
  • #104: After the patient’s clothing has been removed and the assessment is completed, the patient should be covered with warm blankets or an external warming device to prevent hypothermia Intravenous fluids should be warmed before being infused
  • #105: While assessing and managing a patient’s airway, great care should be taken to prevent excessive movement of the cervical spine. The patient’s head and neck should not be hyperextended, hyperflexed, or rotated…(this should be done based on history) JAW THRUST maneuver shold be done in spinal injury.
  • #107: Goals of treatment of maxillary fractures: Precise anatomical reduction to the cranial base above and to the mandible below,Stable fixation of the reduced fragments,Preservation of blood supply to the fractured site and Restoration function
  • #110: Restoration of occlusion is must for correct reduction and Fixation is maintained by external/internal skeletal fixation until consolidation is achieved and Immobilization for 6-8 weeks to stable segments , IMF for 3-4 weeks.
  • #124: Plating system depends on: Rigidity of plate Width and shape Diameter and number of screws Increase in width provides more stability towards rotational forces.
  • #129: In that incision is made 5-10mm above the attached gingiva in the free mucosa around the maxillary arch. This clinical photograph shows the injection of a local anesthetic. The incision is made at least 5-10mm above the mucogingival junction using a scalpel blade or an electrocautery. The incision is carried down through the mucosa, submucosa, underlying facial muscles and periosteum  The incision is made onto the bare bony surface In edentulous patient crestal incision should be made.
  • #130: The smaller, straight unpadded blade is first introduced in the nasal floor and after it larger blade is entered into mouth and the forceps is closed to engage floor of nose and hard palate.Movements-includes upwards- to effect disimpaction of pterygoid plates down. Downwards- to mobilse the maxillae parallel to the inclined plane of cranial base. In case of split palate Hayton williams forceps can be used along with the Rowe’s forceps
  • #131: 2 plates on nasomaxillary buttress. And 2 plates on zygomatico-maxillary buttress.
  • #135: It is also known as, BI-TEMPORAL aproach. The coronal or bitemporal incision is a versatile surgical approach to the upper and middle regions of the facial skeleton, including the zygomatic arch. It provides excellent access to these areas with minimal complications. A major advantage of this approach is that most of the surgical scar is hidden within the hairline. When the incision is extended into the preauricular area, the surgical scar is unnoticeable.  The incision is kept approximately 4 cm behind the hairline. This incision is preferred in most of the female patients and male patients with no signs or family history of baldness. (Zigzag incisions may be used to make the scars less noticeable) The layer of dissection and the extent of exposure depend on the particular surgical procedure for which the coronal approach is used. In some instances, it may be prudent to perform a subperiosteal elevation of the coronal flap from the point of incision. The periosteum is freed with a scalpel along the superior temporal lines as one proceeds anteriorly with the dissection, leaving the temporalis muscles attached to the skull. In most cases, however, dissection and elevation of the coronal flap are in the easily cleavable subgaleal plane. The deeper pericranium may be used as a separate vascularized coronal flap for defect coverage.
  • #136: fronto-nasal suture Infra orbital margin Zygomatico-maxillary butress
  • #143: fronto-nasal suture Fronto-zygomatic suture Zygomatico-temporal suture