SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Propagation-1
RJG 7/31/2008
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Introduction to Radar Systems
Propagation Effects
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-3
RJG 7/31/2008
Radar Block Diagram
Transmitter
Pulse
Compression
Recording
Receiver
Tracking &
Parameter
Estimation
Console /
Display
Antenna
Propagation
Medium
Propagation
Medium
Target
Cross
Section Doppler
Processing
A / D
Waveform
Generator
Detection
Signal Processor
Main Computer
“The Soup”
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-4
RJG 7/31/2008
Radar Classes
• Ground based
• Sea based
• Airborne
Nearly all radar systems operate through the
atmosphere and near the Earth’s surface
Nearly all radar systems operate through the
atmosphere and near the Earth’s surface
AEGIS
Patriot
AWACS
Courtesy of Raytheon. Used with permission.
Courtesy of U.S. Air Force.
Courtesy of U.S. Navy.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-5
RJG 7/31/2008
Propagation Effects on Radar Performance
• Atmospheric attenuation
• Reflection off of Earth’s surface
• Over-the-horizon diffraction
• Atmospheric refraction
Radar beams can be attenuated, reflected and
bent by the environment
Radar beams can be attenuated, reflected and
bent by the environment
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-6
RJG 7/31/2008
What’s in the Soup?
• Atmospheric parameters vary with altitude
– Air density and humidity
– Rain rate
– Fog/cloud water content
– Index of refraction
• Atmospheric parameters vary with altitude
– Air density and humidity
– Rain rate
– Fog/cloud water content
– Index of refraction
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
02101-061
• Earth’s surface
– Surface material (water vs land)
– Surface roughness (waves, mountains)
– Earth’s curvature
• Earth’s surface
– Surface material (water vs land)
– Surface roughness (waves, mountains)
– Earth’s curvature
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-7
RJG 7/31/2008
Outline
• Atmospheric attenuation
• Reflection from the Earth’s surface
• Over-the-horizon diffraction
• Atmospheric refraction
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-8
RJG 7/31/2008
Atmospheric Attenuation at Sea Level
Radar power absorbed
by water vapor and
oxygen
Attenuation is a loss of
power characterized by L
in radar range equation
High frequencies are not well suited for long-range low-altitude surveillance
High frequencies are not well suited for long-range low-altitude surveillance
1 10 100
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Radar Frequency (GHz)
Specific
Attenuation
(dB/km)
1
L S C
X
W
Ka
Ku
10
100
1000
10000
Total
50
km
2-Way
Attenuation
(dB)
1/10 power left
1/10000000000 power left
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-9
RJG 7/31/2008
Attenuation in Rain and Fog
Radar performance at high frequencies is highly weather dependent
Radar performance at high frequencies is highly weather dependent
Figure by MIT OCW.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-10
RJG 7/31/2008
Outline
• Atmospheric attenuation
• Reflection from the Earth’s surface
• Over-the-horizon diffraction
• Atmospheric refraction
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-11
RJG 7/31/2008
Interference Basics
• Two waves can interfere constructively or destructively
• Resulting field strength depends only on relative amplitude
and phase of the two waves
– Radar voltage can range from 0-2 times single wave
– Radar power is proportional to (voltage)2 for 0-4 times the power
– Interference operates both on outbound and return trips for 0-16
times the power
Destructive Interference
Constructive Interference
Wave 1 Wave2 Sum of Waves 1 + 2
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-12
RJG 7/31/2008
Propagation over a Plane Earth
Reflection from the Earth’s surface results in interference of the direct
radar signal with the signal reflected off of the surface
Surface reflection coefficient ( Γ ) determines relative signal amplitudes
Dependent on: surface material, roughness, polarization, frequency
Close to 1 for smooth ocean, close to 0 for rough land
Relative phase determined by path length difference and phase shift on
reflection
Dependent on: height, range and frequency
Radar
Direct path
Multipath
Target
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-13
RJG 7/31/2008
Multipath Alters Radar Detection Range
• Multipath causes elevation coverage to be broken up into a lobed
structure
• A target located at the maximum of a lobe will be detected as far as
twice the free-space detection range
• At other angles the detection range will be less than free space and in a
null no echo signal will be received
Reflection
Coefficient
Γ=-1
Γ=-0.3
Γ=0
Target Range
Target
Altitude
Radar Coverage
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-14
RJG 7/31/2008
Multipath is Frequency Dependent
Lobing density increases with increased radar frequency
Lobing density increases with increased radar frequency
Reflection
Coefficient
Γ=-1
Γ=-0.3
Range
Altitude
Range
Radar Coverage
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Frequency 1
2 x Frequency 1
x x
1 lobe over
distance x :
2 lobes over
distance x :
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-15
RJG 7/31/2008
Outline
• Atmospheric attenuation
• Reflection from the Earth’s surface
• Over-the-horizon diffraction
• Atmospheric refraction
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-16
RJG 7/31/2008
Tsunami Diffracting
around Peninsula
Diffraction
• Radar waves are diffracted around the curved Earth just as
ocean waves are bent by an obstacle
• Web references for excellent water wave photographic
examples:
– http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/Water_diffraction.jpg
– http://yhspatriot.yorktown.arlington.k12.va.us/~ckaldahl/wave.gif
• The ability of radar to propagate beyond the horizon depends
upon frequency and radar height
Courtesy of NOAA / PMEL / Center for Tsunami Research.
See animation at http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/animations/Aonae.all.mpg
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-17
RJG 7/31/2008
Propagation Over Round Earth
• Interference region
– Located within line of sight radar
• Diffraction region
– Below radar line of sight
– Signals are severely attenuated
Interference
Region
Tangent
Ray
Diffraction
Region
Earth
Radar
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-18
RJG 7/31/2008
Combined Diffraction and Multipath
vs Radar Frequency
• Low altitude multipath detection: favors higher frequencies
• Diffraction detection:
– Favors lower frequencies
– Is tough at any frequency
100 ft altitude
at 60 km
Geometric Horizon
X-Band
Lowest multipath lobe is plotted
100 ft altitude
60 dB L-band loss
80 dB X-band loss
L-Band
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-19
RJG 7/31/2008
Outline
• Atmospheric attenuation
• Reflection from the Earth’s surface
• Over-the-horizon diffraction
• Atmospheric refraction
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-20
RJG 7/31/2008
Refraction of Radar Beams
Radar rays bend downwards due to decreasing index of refraction of air with altitude
Same effect as refraction of light beam shining from water into air
Figure by MIT OCW.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-21
RJG 7/31/2008
Earth’s Radius Modified to Account for
Refraction Effects
Atmospheric refraction is accounted for by replacing the actual Earth
radius a, in calculations, by an equivalent earth radius ka and
assuming straight line propagation
4/3 is a typical value for k
Average propagation is referred to as a “4/3 Earth”
Average propagation is referred to as a “4/3 Earth”
Figure by MIT OCW.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-22
RJG 7/31/2008
Anomalous Propagation
• Occurs when k not equal to 4/3
• Categorized as: superrefraction, subrefraction and ducting
– Superrefraction extends the radar horizon
– Subrefraction limits the radar horizon
– Ducting traps radar energy near the Earth’s surface
4/3 Earth Radius 4/3 Earth Radius
Subrefraction
Superrefraction
Ducting
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-23
RJG 7/31/2008
No Surface Duct Surface Duct
Ducting Effects on Target Detection
Ducting extends low-altitude detection ranges but can
cause unexpected holes in radar coverage
Ducting extends low-altitude detection ranges but can
cause unexpected holes in radar coverage
Target seen
Target not seen
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-24
RJG 7/31/2008
Ducted Clutter from New England
Ducting conditions can extend horizon to extreme ranges
Ducting conditions can extend horizon to extreme ranges
50 km range rings
PPI Display
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-25
RJG 7/31/2008
Radar Propagation Effects Summary
1 10 100
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
Radar Frequency (GHz)
Specific
Attenuation
(dB/km)
L S C
X
W
Ka
Ku
Atmospheric Attenuation Multipath and Diffraction
Multipath Reflection
Refraction (Ducting)
4/3 Earth Radius
Reflection
Coefficient
Γ=-1
Γ=-0.3
Γ= 0
Range
Altitude
Target seen
Target not seen
Geometric Horizon
X-Band
L-Band
60 dB L-band loss
80 dB X-band loss
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
Propagation-26
RJG 7/31/2008
References
• Skolnik, M., Introduction to Radar Systems, New York,
McGraw-Hill, 3rd Edition, 2001
• Skolnik, M., Radar Handbook, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2rd
Edition, 1990

More Related Content

PDF
Radar 2009 a 5 propagation effects
PDF
resistivity-orig.pdf
PDF
Radar 2009 a 10 radar clutter.2pdf
PDF
Biases and Receivers (3)
PPT
Lecture on mobile radio environme, nt.ppt
PPTX
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
PPT
Microwave Technology Fundamentals for Telecommunication
PPTX
Satellite communication lecture8
Radar 2009 a 5 propagation effects
resistivity-orig.pdf
Radar 2009 a 10 radar clutter.2pdf
Biases and Receivers (3)
Lecture on mobile radio environme, nt.ppt
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
Microwave Technology Fundamentals for Telecommunication
Satellite communication lecture8

Similar to MIT-LL_Intro to radar systems_lecture 3_Propagation Effects v2.pdf (20)

PPT
Microwave_Fundamentals_ppt.ppt
PPT
Microwave_Fundamentals_ppt.ppt
PDF
Birkan - Space Propulsion and Power - Spring Review 2013
PPT
microwave-fundamentals
PDF
Radiation + Radiation Monitoring Presentation (Online Publication)
PDF
Space Radiation & It's Effects On Space Systems & Astronauts Technical Traini...
PDF
F037033035
PPT
Summary of DART Geophysical Methodology 100111
PPTX
Wireless power transmission via solar power satellite
PPTX
Mikhailov duct PIERS 2017
PPTX
Wireless power transmission technologies for solar power satellite
PPT
Chap 02 antenna & wave propagation
PDF
Radar 2009 a 4 radar equation
PDF
Radar 2009 a 4 radar equation
PPTX
مهم جدا هوائيات.pptx
PDF
Lesson 7 propagation
PPT
Microwave remote sensing
PDF
Haris Haralambous
PDF
Miller - Space Science - Spring Review 2013
Microwave_Fundamentals_ppt.ppt
Microwave_Fundamentals_ppt.ppt
Birkan - Space Propulsion and Power - Spring Review 2013
microwave-fundamentals
Radiation + Radiation Monitoring Presentation (Online Publication)
Space Radiation & It's Effects On Space Systems & Astronauts Technical Traini...
F037033035
Summary of DART Geophysical Methodology 100111
Wireless power transmission via solar power satellite
Mikhailov duct PIERS 2017
Wireless power transmission technologies for solar power satellite
Chap 02 antenna & wave propagation
Radar 2009 a 4 radar equation
Radar 2009 a 4 radar equation
مهم جدا هوائيات.pptx
Lesson 7 propagation
Microwave remote sensing
Haris Haralambous
Miller - Space Science - Spring Review 2013
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
CH1 Production IntroductoryConcepts.pptx
PPTX
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
PDF
July 2025 - Top 10 Read Articles in International Journal of Software Enginee...
PDF
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
PDF
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
PDF
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
PPTX
OOP with Java - Java Introduction (Basics)
PPTX
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
PDF
Model Code of Practice - Construction Work - 21102022 .pdf
PPTX
Infosys Presentation by1.Riyan Bagwan 2.Samadhan Naiknavare 3.Gaurav Shinde 4...
PPTX
UNIT-1 - COAL BASED THERMAL POWER PLANTS
PPTX
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
PPTX
KTU 2019 -S7-MCN 401 MODULE 2-VINAY.pptx
PDF
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
PPT
Project quality management in manufacturing
PPTX
Welding lecture in detail for understanding
PPTX
Recipes for Real Time Voice AI WebRTC, SLMs and Open Source Software.pptx
PPT
Mechanical Engineering MATERIALS Selection
PDF
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
PPTX
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
CH1 Production IntroductoryConcepts.pptx
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
July 2025 - Top 10 Read Articles in International Journal of Software Enginee...
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
OOP with Java - Java Introduction (Basics)
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
Model Code of Practice - Construction Work - 21102022 .pdf
Infosys Presentation by1.Riyan Bagwan 2.Samadhan Naiknavare 3.Gaurav Shinde 4...
UNIT-1 - COAL BASED THERMAL POWER PLANTS
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
KTU 2019 -S7-MCN 401 MODULE 2-VINAY.pptx
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
Project quality management in manufacturing
Welding lecture in detail for understanding
Recipes for Real Time Voice AI WebRTC, SLMs and Open Source Software.pptx
Mechanical Engineering MATERIALS Selection
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
Ad

MIT-LL_Intro to radar systems_lecture 3_Propagation Effects v2.pdf

  • 1. Propagation-1 RJG 7/31/2008 MIT Lincoln Laboratory Introduction to Radar Systems Propagation Effects
  • 2. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-3 RJG 7/31/2008 Radar Block Diagram Transmitter Pulse Compression Recording Receiver Tracking & Parameter Estimation Console / Display Antenna Propagation Medium Propagation Medium Target Cross Section Doppler Processing A / D Waveform Generator Detection Signal Processor Main Computer “The Soup”
  • 3. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-4 RJG 7/31/2008 Radar Classes • Ground based • Sea based • Airborne Nearly all radar systems operate through the atmosphere and near the Earth’s surface Nearly all radar systems operate through the atmosphere and near the Earth’s surface AEGIS Patriot AWACS Courtesy of Raytheon. Used with permission. Courtesy of U.S. Air Force. Courtesy of U.S. Navy.
  • 4. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-5 RJG 7/31/2008 Propagation Effects on Radar Performance • Atmospheric attenuation • Reflection off of Earth’s surface • Over-the-horizon diffraction • Atmospheric refraction Radar beams can be attenuated, reflected and bent by the environment Radar beams can be attenuated, reflected and bent by the environment
  • 5. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-6 RJG 7/31/2008 What’s in the Soup? • Atmospheric parameters vary with altitude – Air density and humidity – Rain rate – Fog/cloud water content – Index of refraction • Atmospheric parameters vary with altitude – Air density and humidity – Rain rate – Fog/cloud water content – Index of refraction MIT Lincoln Laboratory 02101-061 • Earth’s surface – Surface material (water vs land) – Surface roughness (waves, mountains) – Earth’s curvature • Earth’s surface – Surface material (water vs land) – Surface roughness (waves, mountains) – Earth’s curvature
  • 6. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-7 RJG 7/31/2008 Outline • Atmospheric attenuation • Reflection from the Earth’s surface • Over-the-horizon diffraction • Atmospheric refraction
  • 7. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-8 RJG 7/31/2008 Atmospheric Attenuation at Sea Level Radar power absorbed by water vapor and oxygen Attenuation is a loss of power characterized by L in radar range equation High frequencies are not well suited for long-range low-altitude surveillance High frequencies are not well suited for long-range low-altitude surveillance 1 10 100 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Radar Frequency (GHz) Specific Attenuation (dB/km) 1 L S C X W Ka Ku 10 100 1000 10000 Total 50 km 2-Way Attenuation (dB) 1/10 power left 1/10000000000 power left
  • 8. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-9 RJG 7/31/2008 Attenuation in Rain and Fog Radar performance at high frequencies is highly weather dependent Radar performance at high frequencies is highly weather dependent Figure by MIT OCW.
  • 9. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-10 RJG 7/31/2008 Outline • Atmospheric attenuation • Reflection from the Earth’s surface • Over-the-horizon diffraction • Atmospheric refraction
  • 10. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-11 RJG 7/31/2008 Interference Basics • Two waves can interfere constructively or destructively • Resulting field strength depends only on relative amplitude and phase of the two waves – Radar voltage can range from 0-2 times single wave – Radar power is proportional to (voltage)2 for 0-4 times the power – Interference operates both on outbound and return trips for 0-16 times the power Destructive Interference Constructive Interference Wave 1 Wave2 Sum of Waves 1 + 2
  • 11. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-12 RJG 7/31/2008 Propagation over a Plane Earth Reflection from the Earth’s surface results in interference of the direct radar signal with the signal reflected off of the surface Surface reflection coefficient ( Γ ) determines relative signal amplitudes Dependent on: surface material, roughness, polarization, frequency Close to 1 for smooth ocean, close to 0 for rough land Relative phase determined by path length difference and phase shift on reflection Dependent on: height, range and frequency Radar Direct path Multipath Target
  • 12. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-13 RJG 7/31/2008 Multipath Alters Radar Detection Range • Multipath causes elevation coverage to be broken up into a lobed structure • A target located at the maximum of a lobe will be detected as far as twice the free-space detection range • At other angles the detection range will be less than free space and in a null no echo signal will be received Reflection Coefficient Γ=-1 Γ=-0.3 Γ=0 Target Range Target Altitude Radar Coverage
  • 13. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-14 RJG 7/31/2008 Multipath is Frequency Dependent Lobing density increases with increased radar frequency Lobing density increases with increased radar frequency Reflection Coefficient Γ=-1 Γ=-0.3 Range Altitude Range Radar Coverage 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Frequency 1 2 x Frequency 1 x x 1 lobe over distance x : 2 lobes over distance x :
  • 14. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-15 RJG 7/31/2008 Outline • Atmospheric attenuation • Reflection from the Earth’s surface • Over-the-horizon diffraction • Atmospheric refraction
  • 15. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-16 RJG 7/31/2008 Tsunami Diffracting around Peninsula Diffraction • Radar waves are diffracted around the curved Earth just as ocean waves are bent by an obstacle • Web references for excellent water wave photographic examples: – http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/Water_diffraction.jpg – http://yhspatriot.yorktown.arlington.k12.va.us/~ckaldahl/wave.gif • The ability of radar to propagate beyond the horizon depends upon frequency and radar height Courtesy of NOAA / PMEL / Center for Tsunami Research. See animation at http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/animations/Aonae.all.mpg
  • 16. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-17 RJG 7/31/2008 Propagation Over Round Earth • Interference region – Located within line of sight radar • Diffraction region – Below radar line of sight – Signals are severely attenuated Interference Region Tangent Ray Diffraction Region Earth Radar
  • 17. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-18 RJG 7/31/2008 Combined Diffraction and Multipath vs Radar Frequency • Low altitude multipath detection: favors higher frequencies • Diffraction detection: – Favors lower frequencies – Is tough at any frequency 100 ft altitude at 60 km Geometric Horizon X-Band Lowest multipath lobe is plotted 100 ft altitude 60 dB L-band loss 80 dB X-band loss L-Band
  • 18. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-19 RJG 7/31/2008 Outline • Atmospheric attenuation • Reflection from the Earth’s surface • Over-the-horizon diffraction • Atmospheric refraction
  • 19. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-20 RJG 7/31/2008 Refraction of Radar Beams Radar rays bend downwards due to decreasing index of refraction of air with altitude Same effect as refraction of light beam shining from water into air Figure by MIT OCW.
  • 20. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-21 RJG 7/31/2008 Earth’s Radius Modified to Account for Refraction Effects Atmospheric refraction is accounted for by replacing the actual Earth radius a, in calculations, by an equivalent earth radius ka and assuming straight line propagation 4/3 is a typical value for k Average propagation is referred to as a “4/3 Earth” Average propagation is referred to as a “4/3 Earth” Figure by MIT OCW.
  • 21. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-22 RJG 7/31/2008 Anomalous Propagation • Occurs when k not equal to 4/3 • Categorized as: superrefraction, subrefraction and ducting – Superrefraction extends the radar horizon – Subrefraction limits the radar horizon – Ducting traps radar energy near the Earth’s surface 4/3 Earth Radius 4/3 Earth Radius Subrefraction Superrefraction Ducting
  • 22. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-23 RJG 7/31/2008 No Surface Duct Surface Duct Ducting Effects on Target Detection Ducting extends low-altitude detection ranges but can cause unexpected holes in radar coverage Ducting extends low-altitude detection ranges but can cause unexpected holes in radar coverage Target seen Target not seen
  • 23. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-24 RJG 7/31/2008 Ducted Clutter from New England Ducting conditions can extend horizon to extreme ranges Ducting conditions can extend horizon to extreme ranges 50 km range rings PPI Display
  • 24. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-25 RJG 7/31/2008 Radar Propagation Effects Summary 1 10 100 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Radar Frequency (GHz) Specific Attenuation (dB/km) L S C X W Ka Ku Atmospheric Attenuation Multipath and Diffraction Multipath Reflection Refraction (Ducting) 4/3 Earth Radius Reflection Coefficient Γ=-1 Γ=-0.3 Γ= 0 Range Altitude Target seen Target not seen Geometric Horizon X-Band L-Band 60 dB L-band loss 80 dB X-band loss
  • 25. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Propagation-26 RJG 7/31/2008 References • Skolnik, M., Introduction to Radar Systems, New York, McGraw-Hill, 3rd Edition, 2001 • Skolnik, M., Radar Handbook, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2rd Edition, 1990