SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Risk Management:
Value at Risk (VaR)
Analytical Method
(Variance/Covariance Method)
Dr. Nivine Richie
Analytical Method
FIRST, convert the annual statistics to daily values
Daily expected return = annual expected return divided by
250 trading days in a year
= (0.090/250)
= 0.00036 or 0.036% per day
Daily standard deviation = annual standard deviation
divided by the square root of 250 trading days in a year
=
0.155
250
= 0.00980 or 0.098% per day
The Normal Distribution
The analytical method assumes that
returns are normally distributed with a
mean (i.e. an expected return) and a
standard deviation (i.e. risk, or volatility)
The Normal Distribution
To calculate the VaR, we must first convert
the return (our random normal variable)
into a standard normal variable (i.e. a “z”
statistic) so that we can use standard
normal probability tables
The Normal Distribution
Any random normal variable X with a
mean of μ and a standard deviation of 𝜎
can be converted to a standard normal
variable, or Z, using this equation
𝑍 =
𝑋 − μ
𝜎
The Normal Distribution
Converting to a standard normal variable is
handy because the Z statistic has a mean of zero
and a standard deviation of 1 and allows us to
easily apply probability tables.
The Normal Distribution
In our case, the variable X is the portfolio return,
and the mean is the expected return.
To find the 5% value at risk, we want to know
what return would correspond to a 5%
probability of losing at least that value at risk.
In other words, we want to know the return that
corresponds to the bottom 5% of the
distribution
Understanding VaR
Z=1Z= -1.65
Area under the
curve to the left
of this critical Z
represents 5%
probability
5% Value at Risk
To find the return that corresponds to the
bottom 5% of the distribution, we are looking for
the return that produces a –1.65 critical z-value
𝑍 =
𝑋 − μ
𝜎
– 1.65=
𝑉𝑎𝑅−𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛
𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Value at Risk
Solving for VaR at the 5% level, we have:
Many times, VaR is converted to a dollar value
𝑉𝑎𝑅 = 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛 − 1.65(𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐷𝑒𝑣)
𝑉𝑎𝑅 = 0.00036 − 1.65(0.0098)
𝑽𝒂𝑹 = −𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟓𝟖𝟏 𝒐𝒓 − 𝟏. 𝟓𝟖𝟏%
𝑉𝑎𝑅 = −0.01581 × $10,000,000 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑓𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑜
−$𝟏𝟓𝟖, 𝟏𝟎𝟎
Value at Risk
To solve for VaR at the 1% level, we need to know
that the critical Z-value is 2.33 (this would be
given to you)
𝑉𝑎𝑅 = 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛 − 1.65(𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐷𝑒𝑣)
𝑉𝑎𝑅 = 0.00036 − 2.33(0.0098)
𝑽𝒂𝑹 = −𝟎. 𝟎𝟐𝟐𝟓 𝒐𝒓 − 𝟐. 𝟐𝟓%
𝑉𝑎𝑅 = −0.0225 × $10,000,000 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑓𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑜
−$𝟐𝟐𝟓, 𝟎𝟎𝟎
Interpreting Value at Risk
The portfolio faces a 5% probability of
losing at least $158,100 in any one day
The portfolio faces a 1% probability of
losing at least $225,000 in any one day

More Related Content

DOCX
Prestressed
PPTX
Coffer Dams and Caissons
PPTX
Slope Deflection Method
DOCX
Bill Of Quantities
PPTX
Anchors rock anchors
PPTX
Diaphragm wall construction
PDF
slake durability index experiment
DOCX
House Inspection Report
Prestressed
Coffer Dams and Caissons
Slope Deflection Method
Bill Of Quantities
Anchors rock anchors
Diaphragm wall construction
slake durability index experiment
House Inspection Report

What's hot (20)

PDF
Insitu stresses and measurement
PDF
construction material and technology
PPTX
Earthquake resistant design
PPTX
Rock bolts simon madiro
PPTX
Dpwh standard specifications
PPTX
Shaft sinking
PDF
Theory and practice_of_foundation_design_readable
PPTX
House connection from mains, laying and joints in pipes
PPTX
Methods of boring ppt
PDF
Soil Nails Reinforcement - Design nails soil stabilization --مسامير قضبان تسل...
PPTX
Foundation
PPTX
Rock Mechanics and Rock Cavern Design_ICE HKA
PPTX
Conventional shaft sinking by manual means
PDF
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soil
PPTX
Slip formwork for chimney
PPTX
Slip form
PDF
Pressure bulb
DOCX
Construction of Brick Wall
PPT
Impact echo
Insitu stresses and measurement
construction material and technology
Earthquake resistant design
Rock bolts simon madiro
Dpwh standard specifications
Shaft sinking
Theory and practice_of_foundation_design_readable
House connection from mains, laying and joints in pipes
Methods of boring ppt
Soil Nails Reinforcement - Design nails soil stabilization --مسامير قضبان تسل...
Foundation
Rock Mechanics and Rock Cavern Design_ICE HKA
Conventional shaft sinking by manual means
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soil
Slip formwork for chimney
Slip form
Pressure bulb
Construction of Brick Wall
Impact echo
Ad

Similar to Module 7 var analytical method step by step (20)

PDF
Value_At_Risk_An_Introduction.pptx.pdf
PPT
tutorial on VAR.pptjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
PPT
Value At Risk Sep 22
PDF
VaR_My_Presentation
PPTX
Portfolio Risk & Return Part 1.pptx
PDF
VaR Methodologies Jp Morgan
PDF
Risk Measurement in practice
PPT
bài giảng về qtrrtc chương 12 risk management and financial institution
PPTX
Chap2a VaR methods presentation for students
PPTX
Chap2a Value at Risk methods presentation
PPTX
Value at risk
PDF
Introduction To Value At Risk
DOCX
Page 1 of 9 This material is only for the use of stud.docx
PDF
Market Risk Paper
PPTX
Application of square root of time scaling
PDF
2008 implementation of va r in financial institutions
PDF
Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
PDF
Financial risk pdf
PDF
Grey minimalist business project presentation (2).pdf
PDF
CH&Cie white paper value-at-risk in tuburlent times_VaR
Value_At_Risk_An_Introduction.pptx.pdf
tutorial on VAR.pptjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Value At Risk Sep 22
VaR_My_Presentation
Portfolio Risk & Return Part 1.pptx
VaR Methodologies Jp Morgan
Risk Measurement in practice
bài giảng về qtrrtc chương 12 risk management and financial institution
Chap2a VaR methods presentation for students
Chap2a Value at Risk methods presentation
Value at risk
Introduction To Value At Risk
Page 1 of 9 This material is only for the use of stud.docx
Market Risk Paper
Application of square root of time scaling
2008 implementation of va r in financial institutions
Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
Financial risk pdf
Grey minimalist business project presentation (2).pdf
CH&Cie white paper value-at-risk in tuburlent times_VaR
Ad

More from Nivine Richie, CFA (20)

PPTX
Grad programs advising
PPTX
Options extra practice questions
PPTX
Fin 533 module5 binomial step by step (corrected)
PPTX
Module 5. bsm
PPTX
Futures pricing
PPTX
Options payoffs and strategies
PPTX
Options pricing
PPTX
Spring 2017 module 4
PPTX
Spring 2017 module 3 inb
PPTX
Spring 2017 module 3 fin
PPTX
Spring 2017 module 3 ecn
PPTX
Spring 2017 module 2
PPTX
Unit 2 practice
PPTX
2016 fall finance requirements
PPTX
2016 fall economics requirements
PPTX
2016 fall inb requirements
PPTX
Fall 2016 ECN FIN opportunities
PPTX
Fall 2016 economics requirements
PPTX
Fall 2016 finance requirements
PPTX
Your thesis committee
Grad programs advising
Options extra practice questions
Fin 533 module5 binomial step by step (corrected)
Module 5. bsm
Futures pricing
Options payoffs and strategies
Options pricing
Spring 2017 module 4
Spring 2017 module 3 inb
Spring 2017 module 3 fin
Spring 2017 module 3 ecn
Spring 2017 module 2
Unit 2 practice
2016 fall finance requirements
2016 fall economics requirements
2016 fall inb requirements
Fall 2016 ECN FIN opportunities
Fall 2016 economics requirements
Fall 2016 finance requirements
Your thesis committee

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PDF
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PDF
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PPTX
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
PDF
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
PPT- ENG7_QUARTER1_LESSON1_WEEK1. IMAGERY -DESCRIPTIONS pptx.pptx
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPT- ENG7_QUARTER1_LESSON1_WEEK1. IMAGERY -DESCRIPTIONS pptx.pptx
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India

Module 7 var analytical method step by step

  • 1. Risk Management: Value at Risk (VaR) Analytical Method (Variance/Covariance Method) Dr. Nivine Richie
  • 2. Analytical Method FIRST, convert the annual statistics to daily values Daily expected return = annual expected return divided by 250 trading days in a year = (0.090/250) = 0.00036 or 0.036% per day Daily standard deviation = annual standard deviation divided by the square root of 250 trading days in a year = 0.155 250 = 0.00980 or 0.098% per day
  • 3. The Normal Distribution The analytical method assumes that returns are normally distributed with a mean (i.e. an expected return) and a standard deviation (i.e. risk, or volatility)
  • 4. The Normal Distribution To calculate the VaR, we must first convert the return (our random normal variable) into a standard normal variable (i.e. a “z” statistic) so that we can use standard normal probability tables
  • 5. The Normal Distribution Any random normal variable X with a mean of μ and a standard deviation of 𝜎 can be converted to a standard normal variable, or Z, using this equation 𝑍 = 𝑋 − μ 𝜎
  • 6. The Normal Distribution Converting to a standard normal variable is handy because the Z statistic has a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1 and allows us to easily apply probability tables.
  • 7. The Normal Distribution In our case, the variable X is the portfolio return, and the mean is the expected return. To find the 5% value at risk, we want to know what return would correspond to a 5% probability of losing at least that value at risk. In other words, we want to know the return that corresponds to the bottom 5% of the distribution
  • 8. Understanding VaR Z=1Z= -1.65 Area under the curve to the left of this critical Z represents 5% probability
  • 9. 5% Value at Risk To find the return that corresponds to the bottom 5% of the distribution, we are looking for the return that produces a –1.65 critical z-value 𝑍 = 𝑋 − μ 𝜎 – 1.65= 𝑉𝑎𝑅−𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
  • 10. Value at Risk Solving for VaR at the 5% level, we have: Many times, VaR is converted to a dollar value 𝑉𝑎𝑅 = 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛 − 1.65(𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐷𝑒𝑣) 𝑉𝑎𝑅 = 0.00036 − 1.65(0.0098) 𝑽𝒂𝑹 = −𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟓𝟖𝟏 𝒐𝒓 − 𝟏. 𝟓𝟖𝟏% 𝑉𝑎𝑅 = −0.01581 × $10,000,000 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑓𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑜 −$𝟏𝟓𝟖, 𝟏𝟎𝟎
  • 11. Value at Risk To solve for VaR at the 1% level, we need to know that the critical Z-value is 2.33 (this would be given to you) 𝑉𝑎𝑅 = 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑅𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑛 − 1.65(𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐷𝑒𝑣) 𝑉𝑎𝑅 = 0.00036 − 2.33(0.0098) 𝑽𝒂𝑹 = −𝟎. 𝟎𝟐𝟐𝟓 𝒐𝒓 − 𝟐. 𝟐𝟓% 𝑉𝑎𝑅 = −0.0225 × $10,000,000 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑓𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑜 −$𝟐𝟐𝟓, 𝟎𝟎𝟎
  • 12. Interpreting Value at Risk The portfolio faces a 5% probability of losing at least $158,100 in any one day The portfolio faces a 1% probability of losing at least $225,000 in any one day