SlideShare a Scribd company logo
6
Most read
14
Most read
22
Most read
NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC
RADIATIVE FORCING
IPCC AR5
Anakha mohan
2014-20-123
Academy Of Climate Change
Education And Research, KAU
Vellanikkara
1
 The intergovernmental panel on climate change
 International body for assessing the science related to
climate change
 Was set up in 1988
 By the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and United
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
IPCC
2
The IPCC's headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland
3
 Working Group I assesses the scientific aspects of the climate system and
climate change ·
 Working Group II addresses the vulnerability of socio- economic and natural
systems to climate change, negative and positive consequences of climate
change, and options for adapting to it·
 Working Group III assesses options for limiting greenhouse gas emissions
and otherwise mitigating climate change
4
Radiative forcing or climate forcing is defined as the difference of
insolation (sunlight) absorbed by the Earth and energy radiated back
to space.
Anthropogenic forcing is a change in the Earth’s energy
balance due to human activities.
Natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing
5
 The planet was in radiative balance with space before the industrial
revolution. Human activities have altered this balance. The net impact of
any perturbation can be quantified via a net power input into the planet,
This is its radiative forcing.
 Positive forcing warm the planet
 AR5 recognises this for the first time, and designates the total forcing
including these effects as the effective radiative forcing.
Cont’d
6
 Human influence on the climate system is clear, and recent anthropogenic
emissions of greenhouse gases are the highest in history. Recent climate
changes have had widespread impacts on human and natural system
 Which driven atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and
nitrous oxide to levels that are unprecedented in at least the last 800,000
years, leading to an uptake of energy by the climate system.
 Radiative forcing quantifies the perturbation of energy into the Earth
system caused by these drivers. Radiative forcing larger than zero lead to
a near-surface warming, and radiative forcing smaller than zero lead to a
cooling.
Cont’d
7
 Atmospheric concentrations of GHGs are at levels that are unprecedented
in at least 800,000 years. Concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane
(CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) have all shown large increases since 1750
(40%, 150% and 20%, respectively)
Cont’d
8
9
For example,
10
Natural forcing only would have cooled
11
Anthropogenic with natural forcing fit
12
 The radiative forcing from aerosols, which includes cloud adjustments, is
better understood and indicates a weaker cooling effect than in AR4. The
aerosol radiative forcing over 1750–2011 is estimated as –0.9 W/m2
(medium confidence).
 There is high confidence that the global mean total aerosol radiative forcing
has counteracted a substantial portion of radiative forcing from well mixed
GHGs. Aerosols continue to contribute the largest uncertainty to the total
radiative forcing estimate.
The radiative forcing from aerosols
About 5 out of 10 chance About 8 out of 10 chance
13
Human activities affecting emission drivers
 About half of the cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions between 1750 and
2011 have occurred in the last 40 years (high confidence).
 About 40% of these anthropogenic CO2 emissions have remained in the
atmosphere since 1750. The rest was removed from the atmosphere by sinks,
and stored in natural carbon cycle reservoirs
 Total annual anthropogenic GHG emissions have continued to increase over
1970 to 2010 with larger absolute increases between 2000 and 2010 (high
confidence)
14
15
16
 CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes
contributed about 78% to the total GHG emission increase between 1970
and 2010, with a contribution of similar percentage over the 2000–2010
period (high confidence).
 Total annual anthropogenic GHG emissions have increased by about 10
GtCO2 between 2000 and 2010. This increase directly came from the
energy (47%), industry (30%), transport (11%) and building (3%) sectors
(medium confidence). Accounting for indirect emissions raises the
contributions by the building and industry sectors (high confidence).
Cont’d
17
 Globally, economic and population growth continue to be the most
important drivers of increases in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel
combustion. The contribution of population growth between 2000
and 2010 remained roughly identical to that of the previous three
decades, while the contribution of economic growth has risen
sharply (high confidence)
Cont’d
18
19
 Estimated present-day radiative forcing is higher than in AR4 due to:
larger estimates of black carbon forcing, smaller estimate of aerosol
cloud-mediated cooling effect, and increased greenhouse gases since
2007.
 CO2 overwhelms other forcing, in most future scenarios.
 Natural forcing only would have cooled, Anthropogenic with natural
forcing fit to current observations
In a nut shell
20
REFERENCE
IPCC fourth assessment report; WGII; chapter 2; Changes in
Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing; page no. 131-
217
IPCC Fifth assessment report; WGII; chapter 8; Anthropogenic and
Natural Radiative Forcing; page no.661-731
IPCC Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report page no.39-48
21
Think now and decide here….
Thankyou22

More Related Content

PDF
Activities of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
 
PDF
Lesson 3 Drivers of climate change
PDF
Climate Change Adaptation Strategy
PPT
General circulation model
PPTX
Vulnerability and Impact Assessment climate change
PPTX
Environment modelling
PPTX
Theme 4 - Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
PDF
Climate Change Effects on Forest
Activities of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
 
Lesson 3 Drivers of climate change
Climate Change Adaptation Strategy
General circulation model
Vulnerability and Impact Assessment climate change
Environment modelling
Theme 4 - Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
Climate Change Effects on Forest

What's hot (20)

PPT
VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION
PPTX
Climate change prediction
PDF
Climate models
PPTX
REDD+ and Biodiversity Conservation
PPTX
Restoration Ecology in Environmental Science
PDF
EIA for Major development projects - Mining projects
PDF
Indicators of climate change
PPT
Climate System
PPTX
Eia - environmental impact assessment
PPTX
Climate change and vulnerability assessment in agriculture
PPTX
Wetland as carbon Sink
PPTX
Introduction to Strategic Environmental Assessment
PDF
Ecological Footprint Presentation
PPT
Climate Change and Adaptation: Where do we go from here?
PPTX
Clean development mechanism
PPTX
Energy budget of earth
PPTX
PPTX
Carbon-dioxide as a pollutant
PPTX
Climate Change - Basic Understanding; Causes Effects & Remedies
PPTX
VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION
Climate change prediction
Climate models
REDD+ and Biodiversity Conservation
Restoration Ecology in Environmental Science
EIA for Major development projects - Mining projects
Indicators of climate change
Climate System
Eia - environmental impact assessment
Climate change and vulnerability assessment in agriculture
Wetland as carbon Sink
Introduction to Strategic Environmental Assessment
Ecological Footprint Presentation
Climate Change and Adaptation: Where do we go from here?
Clean development mechanism
Energy budget of earth
Carbon-dioxide as a pollutant
Climate Change - Basic Understanding; Causes Effects & Remedies
Ad

Similar to NATURAL AND ANTHAOPOGENIC RADIATIVE FORCING BASED ON IPCC AR5 (20)

PDF
STS-UNIT 4 CLIMATE CHANGE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
PPTX
GLOBAL WARMING CAUSES FLOOD & DROUGHT
PPT
Raymond Desjardins - Impacto de la agricultura sobre el cambio climático
PPT
09-28-17 Lifelong Learning Lecture: Jim Haynes
PDF
Discussions about Climate Change, Impacts and Vulnerability
 
DOCX
How to explain global warming The question of Attribution
PPT
Global Warming and Climate Change
PPTX
Module 1 power point presentation
PDF
Lesson 4 Attribution of climate change
PPTX
Present vs. Future Climate: What Science tells Us?
PDF
Climate Science Explained by Team Norvergence
PPT
Climate presentation
PPT
Climate Change
PPT
Climate presentation
PPT
03_Day_1_Hansen
PPTX
Module 1 power point presentation
PDF
Inter exp
PDF
Global Warming Has Accelerated Are the United Nations and the Public Well-In...
PDF
The Anthropogenic Greenhouse Effects
PPTX
Global climate change and us environmental law power point presentation fi...
STS-UNIT 4 CLIMATE CHANGE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
GLOBAL WARMING CAUSES FLOOD & DROUGHT
Raymond Desjardins - Impacto de la agricultura sobre el cambio climático
09-28-17 Lifelong Learning Lecture: Jim Haynes
Discussions about Climate Change, Impacts and Vulnerability
 
How to explain global warming The question of Attribution
Global Warming and Climate Change
Module 1 power point presentation
Lesson 4 Attribution of climate change
Present vs. Future Climate: What Science tells Us?
Climate Science Explained by Team Norvergence
Climate presentation
Climate Change
Climate presentation
03_Day_1_Hansen
Module 1 power point presentation
Inter exp
Global Warming Has Accelerated Are the United Nations and the Public Well-In...
The Anthropogenic Greenhouse Effects
Global climate change and us environmental law power point presentation fi...
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PDF
Pre independence Education in Inndia.pdf
PPTX
PPH.pptx obstetrics and gynecology in nursing
PDF
ANTIBIOTICS.pptx.pdf………………… xxxxxxxxxxxxx
PDF
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PDF
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PPTX
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
PPTX
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
PPTX
Institutional Correction lecture only . . .
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PDF
Insiders guide to clinical Medicine.pdf
PDF
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PDF
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
PPTX
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
Pre independence Education in Inndia.pdf
PPH.pptx obstetrics and gynecology in nursing
ANTIBIOTICS.pptx.pdf………………… xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
master seminar digital applications in india
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
Institutional Correction lecture only . . .
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
Insiders guide to clinical Medicine.pdf
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx

NATURAL AND ANTHAOPOGENIC RADIATIVE FORCING BASED ON IPCC AR5

  • 1. NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC RADIATIVE FORCING IPCC AR5 Anakha mohan 2014-20-123 Academy Of Climate Change Education And Research, KAU Vellanikkara 1
  • 2.  The intergovernmental panel on climate change  International body for assessing the science related to climate change  Was set up in 1988  By the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) IPCC 2
  • 3. The IPCC's headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland 3
  • 4.  Working Group I assesses the scientific aspects of the climate system and climate change ·  Working Group II addresses the vulnerability of socio- economic and natural systems to climate change, negative and positive consequences of climate change, and options for adapting to it·  Working Group III assesses options for limiting greenhouse gas emissions and otherwise mitigating climate change 4
  • 5. Radiative forcing or climate forcing is defined as the difference of insolation (sunlight) absorbed by the Earth and energy radiated back to space. Anthropogenic forcing is a change in the Earth’s energy balance due to human activities. Natural and anthropogenic radiative forcing 5
  • 6.  The planet was in radiative balance with space before the industrial revolution. Human activities have altered this balance. The net impact of any perturbation can be quantified via a net power input into the planet, This is its radiative forcing.  Positive forcing warm the planet  AR5 recognises this for the first time, and designates the total forcing including these effects as the effective radiative forcing. Cont’d 6
  • 7.  Human influence on the climate system is clear, and recent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are the highest in history. Recent climate changes have had widespread impacts on human and natural system  Which driven atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide to levels that are unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years, leading to an uptake of energy by the climate system.  Radiative forcing quantifies the perturbation of energy into the Earth system caused by these drivers. Radiative forcing larger than zero lead to a near-surface warming, and radiative forcing smaller than zero lead to a cooling. Cont’d 7
  • 8.  Atmospheric concentrations of GHGs are at levels that are unprecedented in at least 800,000 years. Concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) have all shown large increases since 1750 (40%, 150% and 20%, respectively) Cont’d 8
  • 10. 10
  • 11. Natural forcing only would have cooled 11
  • 12. Anthropogenic with natural forcing fit 12
  • 13.  The radiative forcing from aerosols, which includes cloud adjustments, is better understood and indicates a weaker cooling effect than in AR4. The aerosol radiative forcing over 1750–2011 is estimated as –0.9 W/m2 (medium confidence).  There is high confidence that the global mean total aerosol radiative forcing has counteracted a substantial portion of radiative forcing from well mixed GHGs. Aerosols continue to contribute the largest uncertainty to the total radiative forcing estimate. The radiative forcing from aerosols About 5 out of 10 chance About 8 out of 10 chance 13
  • 14. Human activities affecting emission drivers  About half of the cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions between 1750 and 2011 have occurred in the last 40 years (high confidence).  About 40% of these anthropogenic CO2 emissions have remained in the atmosphere since 1750. The rest was removed from the atmosphere by sinks, and stored in natural carbon cycle reservoirs  Total annual anthropogenic GHG emissions have continued to increase over 1970 to 2010 with larger absolute increases between 2000 and 2010 (high confidence) 14
  • 15. 15
  • 16. 16
  • 17.  CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes contributed about 78% to the total GHG emission increase between 1970 and 2010, with a contribution of similar percentage over the 2000–2010 period (high confidence).  Total annual anthropogenic GHG emissions have increased by about 10 GtCO2 between 2000 and 2010. This increase directly came from the energy (47%), industry (30%), transport (11%) and building (3%) sectors (medium confidence). Accounting for indirect emissions raises the contributions by the building and industry sectors (high confidence). Cont’d 17
  • 18.  Globally, economic and population growth continue to be the most important drivers of increases in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion. The contribution of population growth between 2000 and 2010 remained roughly identical to that of the previous three decades, while the contribution of economic growth has risen sharply (high confidence) Cont’d 18
  • 19. 19
  • 20.  Estimated present-day radiative forcing is higher than in AR4 due to: larger estimates of black carbon forcing, smaller estimate of aerosol cloud-mediated cooling effect, and increased greenhouse gases since 2007.  CO2 overwhelms other forcing, in most future scenarios.  Natural forcing only would have cooled, Anthropogenic with natural forcing fit to current observations In a nut shell 20
  • 21. REFERENCE IPCC fourth assessment report; WGII; chapter 2; Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing; page no. 131- 217 IPCC Fifth assessment report; WGII; chapter 8; Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing; page no.661-731 IPCC Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report page no.39-48 21
  • 22. Think now and decide here…. Thankyou22

Editor's Notes

  • #3: to provide policymakers with regular assessments of the scientific basis of climate change, its impacts and future risks, and options for adaptation and mitigation.
  • #11: 40% from natural sources Decaying vegetation, marsh gas. Agriculture, especially rice paddies with anaerobic bacteria. Ruminants (cattle and sheep) – you don’t want to know where it comes from! 500L cow-1 day-1 Termites (same chemistry)
  • #14: Radiative forcing from aerosols has two competing components: a dominant cooling effect from most aerosols and their cloud adjustments and a partially offsetting warming contribution from black carbon absorption of solar radiation Changes in solar irradiance and volcanic aerosols cause natural radiative forcing. The radiative forcing from stratospheric volcanic aerosols can have a large cooling effect on the climate system for some years after major volcanic eruptions. Changes in total solar irradiance are calculated to have contributed only around 2% of the total radiative forcing in 2011, relative to 1750.
  • #15: . Cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions of 2040 ± 310 GtCO2 were added to the atmosphere between 1750 and 2011. Since 1970, cumulative CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion, cement production and flaring have tripled, and cumulative CO2 emissions from forestry and other land use21(FOLU)22 have increased by about 40% (Figure 1.5)23. In 2011, annual CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion, cement production and flaring were 34.8 ± 2.9 GtCO2/yr. For 2002–2011, average annual emissions from FOLU were 3.3 ± 2.9 GtCO2/yr.
  • #16: | Annual global anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (gigatonne of CO2-equivalent per year, GtCO2/yr) from fossil fuel combustion, cement production and flaring, and forestry and other land use (FOLU), 1750–2011. Cumulative emissions and their uncertainties are shown as bars and whiskers, respectively, on the right-hand side. The global effects of the accumulation of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions are shown in Figure 1.3. Greenhouse gas emission data from 1970 to 2010 are shown in Figure 1.6. {modified from WGI Figure TS.4 and WGIII Figure TS.2}
  • #17: Total annual anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (gigatonne of CO2-equivalent per year, GtCO2-eq/yr) for the period 1970 to 2010, by gases: CO2 from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes; CO2 from Forestry and Other Land Use (FOLU); methane (CH4); nitrous oxide (N2O); fluorinated gases covered under the Kyoto Protocol (F-gases). Right hand side shows 2010 emissions, using alternatively CO2-equivalent emission weightings based on IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR) and AR5 values. Unless otherwise stated, CO2-equivalent emissions in this report include the basket of Kyoto gases (CO2, CH4, N2O as well as F-gases) calculated based on 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP100) values from the SAR (see Glossary). Using the most recent GWP100 values from the AR5 (right-hand bars) would result in higher total annual GHG emissions (52 GtCO2-eq/yr) from an increased contribution of methane, but does not change the long-term trend significantly. Other metric choices would change the contributions of different gases (see Box 3.2). The 2010 values are shown again broken down into their components with the associated uncertainties (90% confidence interval) indicated by the error bars. Global CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion are known with an 8% uncertainty margin (90% confidence interval). There are very large uncertainties (of the order of ±50%) attached to the CO2 emissions from FOLU. Uncertainty about the global emissions of CH4, N2O and the F-gases has been estimated at 20%, 60% and 20%, respectively. 2010 was the most recent year for which emission statistics on all gases as well as assessments of uncertainties were essentially complete at the time of data cut off for this report. The uncertainty estimates only account for uncertainty in emissions, not in the GWPs (as given in WGI 8.7). {WGIII Figure SPM.1}
  • #20: Total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (gigatonne of CO2- equivalent per year, GtCO2-eq/yr) from economic sectors in 2010. The circle shows the shares of direct GHG emissions (in % of total anthropogenic GHG emissions) from five economic sectors in 2010. The pull-out shows how shares of indirect CO2 emissions (in % of total anthropogenic GHG emissions) from electricity and heat production are attributed to sectors of final energy use. ‘Other energy’ refers to all GHG emission sources in the energy sector as defined in WGIII Annex II, other than electricity and heat production {WGIII Annex II.9.1}. The emission data on agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) includes land-based CO2 emissions from forest fires, peat fires and peat decay that approximate to net CO2 flux from the sub-sectors of forestry and other land use (FOLU) as described in Chapter 11 of the WGIII report. Emissions are converted into CO2-equivalents based on 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP100), taken from the IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR). Sector definitions are provided in WGIII Annex II.9. {WGIII Figure SPM.2}