Negative Marketing Effect on Utilization of Unsafe Products

INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
Course
Methods in Business Research
Report on
Negative Marketing Effect on Utilization of Unsafe Products
Submitted to
Sir. Usman Ali Warriach
Submitted by
Abdul Aziz Afzal Siddiqui 20181-23465

2 | P a g e
Table of Contents
1. Background and Introduction ...........................................................................................4
1.1 Background of the Study ..........................................................................................4
1.2 Statement of Problem...............................................................................................4
1.3 Research Questions..................................................................................................4
1.4 Objectives of the Study ............................................................................................5
1.5 Significance of the Study..........................................................................................5
1.6 Limitation of Study..................................................................................................6
1.7 Scope of Study ........................................................................................................6
1.8 Assumptions............................................................................................................6
1.9 Definition of Key Words ..........................................................................................6
Negative Marketing.........................................................................................................6
Unsafe products ..............................................................................................................7
1.10 Acronyms................................................................................................................7
2. Literature Review............................................................................................................7
2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................7
2.2 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................9
2.3 Hypothesis ..............................................................................................................9
3. Research Method.............................................................................................................9
3.1 Research Design ......................................................................................................9
3.1.1 Type of research...............................................................................................9
3.1.2 Methods of Research ........................................................................................9
3.1.3 Objective of Research.......................................................................................9
3.1.4 Scope of Research..........................................................................................10
3.1.5 Technique / Way of Research..........................................................................10
3.1.6 Approach of Research.....................................................................................10
3.1.7 Time Horizon.................................................................................................10
3.1.8 Study Setting..................................................................................................10
3.1.9 Type of Investigation ......................................................................................10
3.1.10 Philosophy of Research...................................................................................10
3.2 Population and Sample...........................................................................................11
3.2.1 Sample Unit ...................................................................................................11
3.2.2 Sampling Technique .......................................................................................11
3.2.3 Sample Size ...................................................................................................11
3.3 Instrumentation......................................................................................................11

3 | P a g e
3.3.1 Variables........................................................................................................11
3.3.2 Validity Test ..................................................................................................12
3.3.3 Reliability Test...............................................................................................12
3.4 Ethical Consideration.............................................................................................12
3.5 Data Analysis Plan.................................................................................................12
4. Results..........................................................................................................................13
4.1 Descriptive Statistics..............................................................................................13
4.2 Inferential Statistics ...............................................................................................13
4.3 Hypothesis Assessment Summary...........................................................................14
5. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation.................................................................14
References ...........................................................................................................................16
Appendix .............................................................................................................................16

4 | P a g e
1. Background and Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
In this research we will bring in to light few elements which are determining
and leading to certain outcome regarding the negative marketing of unsafe
products. There are many unsafe products such as wine, narcotics, weapons,
tobacco etc. As we live in eastern country so our culture does not support
much more wine, narcotics and weapon whereas tobacco is normally used
in our country although it is also injurious to health but due to low price or
easy accessible product, we are going to research on tobacco only from all
unsafe products.
Negative marketing is an effort or tool to reduce or bound demand for
consumption of a particular product or service on a permanent or temporary
basis. Therefore, de-marketing is able to be applied on both private and
public sector goals. Injurious goods are sometime being promoted to the
consumers by manufacturer and their distributors. (Raut & Pawar, 2012)
Demarketing strategies have played a significant, if unacknowledged, role
in the global tobacco war. The authors used structural equation modeling to
test the hypothesized relationships among policy initiatives aimed at each
of the 4Ps and attitudes toward smoking, attitudes toward the tobacco
industry and intentions to quit smoking at two points in time. (Lefebvre &
Kotler, 2011) The research presented adds to the growing body of literature
on demarketing efforts by examining the linkages between their
implementation and consumers’ subsequent attitudinal and behavioral
responses. (Ramirez et al., 2017)
1.2 Statement of Problem
In this research, we would study and discuss factors that lead to utilization
of unsafe products i.e., tobacco. Problem statement will help to discover
factors of utilization of tobacco. Dependent variable is utilization of unsafe
products i.e., tobacco whereas it will be found, in this research, which
factors are playing role of independent variables on utilization of tobacco.
1.3 Research Questions
Research question are questions those a research project sets out to answer.
Choosing research questions is an essential element of both quantitative and
qualitative research. Investigation will require data collection and analysis,
and the methodology for this will vary widely. Our research questions are
as follows;
a) Does negative marketing effect on end user psychologically? Or they
think it is useless. What are their attitudes towards advertisement of
tobacco products?

5 | P a g e
b) Is there any connection between social gathering and utilization of
tobacco?
c) Is advertisement of tobacco in films and give away by tobacco
companies discourage negative marketing of tobacco?
d) Does negative marketing of tobacco will help to reduce utilization of
tobacco?
e) At which extent negative marketing demoralizes intention towards
utilization of tobacco?
1.4 Objectives of the Study
Objective of this hypothesis testing is to highlight the concept of association
of utilization of tobacco on negative marketing tactics. Objective of this
hypothesis testing is to check any correlational theory between negative
marketing and utilization of unsafe products i.e., tobacco. If we increase
negative marketing so utilization of tobacco is decreased or not.
1.5 Significance of the Study
Negative marketing or demarketing may be considered as non-selling or
marketing in reverse, which includes general and selective demarketing.
Although the concept of demarketing or negative marketing lacks a precise
theoretical definition, it refers to an attempt by the firm to discourage all or
some of its customers from making purchases either temporarily or
permanently. Since the initial interests in the subject area of how to market
strategically in times of shortages began, different viewpoints have been
offered as to how the firm should pursue demarketing. Significance of the
study with concern of tobacco product negative marketing. Another
objective of the study is to discover the perception of tobacco users towards
the negative marketing of tobacco products.
Various articles indicate that the study is useful to hypothesis testing in their
countries and respective territories such as USA, UK, UAE and in India as
well. Marketing scholars have studied demarketing primarily in the context
of smoking. This research enlarges set of hypotheses desired at
understanding the impact of negative marketing of unsafe product i.e.,
Tobacco. (Raut & Pawar, 2012)
There are many unsafe products such as wine, narcotics, weapons, tobacco
etc. As we live in eastern country so our culture does not support much more
wine, narcotics and weapon whereas tobacco is normally used in our
country although it is also injurious to health but due to low price or easy
accessible product, we are going to research on the utilization of tobacco
products only from all unsafe products.

6 | P a g e
1.6 Limitation of Study
Everything has limitation in their scope thus this study also has few
limitations which are described as follows;
a) Although we are not gathering data from any person but just to reach any
particular and certain conclusion, so we assume that as we live in a very
populated country even the city is overpopulated so we would gather data
from the city of Karachi and few areas of Karachi.
b) There are many people who utilize tobacco products so it would be
complicated to get data from majority for the sake of minimizing sample
error.
c) Moreover, this study does not have destructive nature of sample, but it has
more time-consuming activity and large population size that is why we
account for these elements as limitations in our study.
1.7 Scope of Study
Although we are not gathering data from any person but just to reach any
particular and certain conclusion, we assume that we are going to collect
data from KHI and some of its areas. This study is not specific to any gender
thus male and female both are tested and checked for hypothesis testing. As
such no special educational background is necessary. The study will cover
both literate and illiterate people, but we have age restriction in this
research. We assume that we will collect data from person who is must
above 25 and below 35 and we also assume that we are supposed to do
hypothesis testing on 384 peoples regardless of their class of income. It
includes lower class, middle class and upper class.
1.8 Assumptions
Although we are not gathering data from any person but just to reach a
particular and certain conclusion, we assume that we would gather data
from people who utilize tobacco products. We will not induce any person
who did not utilize before. Only who are addictive or habitual to do smoking
we will gather data from them as well as we will ask them the reason for
smoking. What makes them to smoke more and in which circumstances they
do more, and any negative marketing is going to impact on utilization of
tobacco products what they perceive about their selves and regarding other
people.
1.9 Definition of Key Words
Negative Marketing
Efforts aimed at discouraging (not destroying) the demand for a product
which (1) a firm cannot supply in large-enough quantities, or (2) does not
want to supply in a certain region where the high costs of distribution or
promotion allow only a too little profit margin. Common negative

7 | P a g e
marketing strategies include higher prices, scaled-down advertising, and
product redesign.
Unsafe products
Unsafe products term used to those products that are not physically, socially
and ethically safe as it creates significant risk or injury to the person. It not
only harms the person but also to the others in the surrounding and cause
damage to the society. It includes cigarettes, cigars, and pipe tobacco are
made from dried tobacco leaves. Other substances are added for flavor and
to make smoking more pleasant. The smoke from these products is a
complex mixture of chemicals produced by burning tobacco and its
additives.
1.10 Acronyms
KHI Karachi
UK United Kingdom
USA United States of America
UAE United Arab Emirates
2. Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
The demarketing of tobacco has primarily occurred along three fronts mass
Media i.e., the use of antismoking advertisements, regulatory measures i.e.,
taxes and smoking bans, and public opinion i.e., normative behavior. The
goal of mass media efforts of governments and some tobacco manufacturers
has been to discourage and prevent smoking behavior. The goal of many of
these social marketing campaigns has been to prevent adolescents from
starting to smoke cigarettes. Findings concerning antismoking advertising
have shown that exposure of students to these ads has contributed to the
enhancement of school-based prevention programs. (Moore, 2005)
Media and advertising play a significant role in marketing tobacco products
to the public. Tobacco companies use strategic marketing campaigns and
enticing advertisements to encourage customers to purchase specific brands
of tobacco products. In order to create a foundation for an effective stop
smoking intervention, the attitudes and beliefs of the indigent must be
considered. Unfortunately, there have been very few studies conducted on
the attitudes and beliefs regarding tobacco use among the poor. (Lee et al.,
2004)
A ban on cigarette advertising through television and radio has been in place
in the U.S. since 1971. However, Saffer and Chaloupka (2000) conclude
that governmental demarketing of tobacco through advertising bans in the
U.S. will have little effect on tobacco consumption unless a comprehensive

8 | P a g e
ban is enforced. This research advances demarketing research in an anti-
consumption context by empirically assessing the influence of demarketing
measures on smokers' attitudes and their intention to quit smoking.
Specifically, two waves of a survey were used to test the effect of smokers'
elaboration as a consequence of the four demarketing elements, product,
price, place, and promotion. To fulfill this purpose this article (1) develops
a conceptual model in which the 4Ps of demarketing are treated as
determinants of smokers' attitude and quitting intention, (2) formulates
testable hypotheses on direct, mediating and longitudinal effects, and (3)
tests the model against empirical data from two survey waves, based on the
same sample of respondents. (Shiu et al., 2009)
Prevention, Protection and Prosecution can also be considered as tools of
de-marketing. The de-marketing campaign has resulted in increased
negative attitudes toward smoking and a stigma toward individuals who
smoke (Kim & Shanahan; Pechmann & Ratneshwar, 1994). Antismoking
advertising alone is not responsible for changes in perceptions of smoking.
Researchers (e.g., McAlister, Krosnick, & Milburn, 1984; Meier, 1991)
have long noted that negative public sentiment as expressed through
parents, peers, and siblings are important factors in the formation of
unfavorable attitudes toward smoking. (Raut & Pawar, 2012)
Demarketing, counter-marketing, and social marketing may all sound
similar though they are different constructs. So, it may be worthwhile to
briefly distinguish them from one another before going on with
demarketing. As alluded to above, demarketing efforts involve an
organization’s public advocacy for consumption reduction (Kotler 2011).
As Gundlach, Bradford, and Wilkie (2010, p. 107) note, “demarketing
involves discouraging demand in general or on the part of a certain class of
customers, either temporarily or on a continuing basis. Counter-marketing,
a stronger strategy, involves total repudiation of the relevant demand, in
getting rid of undesirable customers certain types of transactions. (Ramirez
et al., 2017)
Demarketing strategies have played a significant, if unacknowledged, role
in the global tobacco war. While many participants would not be familiar
with the term, demarketing objectives and strategies are readily apparent. In
the tobacco control field, ‘counter-marketing’ has been used to describe
promotional efforts such as mass media campaigns (Farrelly et al., 2002).
However, other tobacco control efforts aimed at product, price and place
restrictions have rarely been conceptualized into a marketing mix
framework, with the exception of the ASSIST project as described by
Lefebvre (2008). (Lefebvre & Kotler, 2011)

9 | P a g e
Demarketing strategy is an integral part of overall marketing and focuses
on reducing or rationing demand. The market situation that has accelerated
interest in demarketing offers new opportunities to the alert marketer and
important opportunities for all companies to increase the productivity of
their marketing expenditures. (Cui, 1974)
2.2 Theoretical Framework
2.3 Hypothesis
H1: There is negative/inverse relationship between utilization of tobacco
and Negative Marketing.
H2: There is no relationship between Utilization of tobacco and Negative
Marketing.
3. Research Method
3.1 Research Design
3.1.1 Type of research
This research type is quantitative research because there are various
theories already exist and available. We are just doing hypothesis
testing between dependent variable i.e., utilization of tobacco and
independent variable i.e., negative marketing.
3.1.2 Methods of Research
Method of research is Mono method. Mono method study uses only
one type of method, one quantitative or one qualitative. In general,
in a quantitative study, the data is in numerical form and this
information is analyzed using quantitative data analysis techniques.
Mono method includes questionnaire, survey, grounded theory and
case study.
3.1.3 Objective of Research
Objective of research is Explanatory research because there are
many theories already exist and available. We are just doing
hypothesis testing between dependent variable i.e., utilization of
tobacco and independent variable i.e., negative marketing because
all variables are available so far, so it is explanatory research.

10 | P a g e
3.1.4 Scope of Research
Scope of this research is basic research. It is also called pure research
or fundamental research because this is general research not specific
to any brand, person, group or organization etc.
3.1.5 Technique / Way of Research
The extent of this research interference is No. There is no
interference from the researcher. All variables are kept as per
practice, standard, or as per routine as they were. This research is
done in natural environment where work proceed normally.
3.1.6 Approach of Research
As we know that there are various theories already exist. We are just
doing hypothesis testing between dependent variable i.e., utilization
of tobacco and independent variable i.e., negative marketing.so it is
a qualitative research and in this process of reasoning from one or
more statements to reach a logically certain conclusion, so it is
deductive approach.
3.1.7 Time Horizon
Although we are not gathering data from any person but just to reach
any particular and certain conclusion, we assume that data will be
taken twice before and after negative marketing. As a longitudinal
study is a research design that involves repeated observations of the
same variables over short or long periods of time, so our research
time horizon is Longitudinal.
3.1.8 Study Setting
This study setting is non-contrived or natural. All variables are kept
as per practice, standard, or as per routine as they were. This
research is done in natural environment where work proceed
normally.
3.1.9 Type of Investigation
In this research, we will describe the important variables associated
with the problem i.e., utilization to tobacco. We are just checking
the relationship between dependent variable and independent
variable, so it is called correlational type of investigation.
3.1.10 Philosophy of Research
As a philosophy of research, this research pertains to positivism
because it is quantitative research. Positivism adheres to the view
that only factual knowledge gained through observation, including
measurement, is trustworthy. In positivism studies the role of the
researcher is limited to data collection and interpretation in an
objective way.

11 | P a g e
3.2 Population and Sample
3.2.1 Sample Unit
Sample unit is an individual person. The term sampling unit refers
to a singular value within a sample database. Although we are not
gathering data from any person but just to reach any particular and
certain conclusion, we assume that we will count a person as an
individual sample unit.
3.2.2 Sampling Technique
Although we did not gather data from any person but just to reach
any particular and certain conclusion, we assume that we don’t have
data or available list of person who utilizes tobacco so this type of
sampling technique is called non-probability sampling technique as
we don’t have certain or known population size.
3.2.3 Sample Size
Although we did not gather data from any person but just to reach
any particular and certain conclusion, we assume that we will collect
data from 384 people and our response rate would be 70 pc. It means
we will request 384 people to answer the questions but only 269
people submit their answers. 384 is a calculated number by sample
size calculator. We used confidence level 95% and confidence
interval is 5. We collect sample when there is one of any below four
cause exist.
i. Large population size
ii. Time Factor
iii. Cost Factor
iv. Destructive Nature of sample
As we have large population size as well as time and cost factor also
included so we took sample size.
3.3 Instrumentation
3.3.1 Variables
In this research we have one dependent variable i.e., Utilization of
Tobacco. It is observed variable. It will be measured by sales of
tobacco before and after negative marketing so that we could check
effect of negative marketing in term of increase in sales or decrease
in sales unit of tobacco and we have one independent variable i.e.,
negative marketing/demarketing. It is un-observed variable. It will
be measured by questionnaire that we have designed that negative
marketing does effect on utilization of tobacco or not. Items are
given in appendix. A descriptive research design, involving 384
samples size was used for this study. A structured questionnaire was

12 | P a g e
used as research instrument. It was pre-tested for further refinement.
The Likert scale type statements were generated to measure the
perception of tobacco users towards the negative marketing of
tobacco products on a simple five-point scale, preferred for ease of
administration in short time. The points on the scale were labeled as,
1 (strongly disagree), to 5 (strongly agree). (Raut & Pawar, 2012)
3.3.2 Validity Test
Although we did not gather data from any person, but we are
defining the validity test. Validity test is the extent to which a test
accurately measures what it is supposed to measure. Validity test
refers to the degree to which evidence and theory support the
interpretations of test scores entailed by proposed uses of tests.
3.3.3 Reliability Test
Although we did not gather data from any person, but we are
defining the reliability test. Reliability test refers to the degree to
which a test is consistent and stable in measuring what it is intended
to measure. Most simply put, a test is reliable if it is consistent within
itself and across time.
3.4 Ethical Consideration
Although we did not gather data from any person but just to reach any
particular and certain conclusion, we assume that our research and its
processes will not harm research participants in any ways whatsoever. We
also assume that in the all processes of this research, respect for the dignity
of research participants should be prioritized. Any deception or
exaggeration about the aims and objectives of the research must be avoided.
Any type of misleading information, as well as representation of primary
data findings in a biased way must be avoided. We also assume that full
consent should be obtained from the participants prior to the study.
Anonymity of individuals who are participating in the research, has to be
ensured. Any type of communication in relation to the research should be
done with honesty and transparency. The protection of the privacy of
research participants has to be ensured. Affiliations in any forms, sources
of funding, as well as any possible conflicts of interests have to be declared
and we also assume that we will ensure adequate level of confidentiality of
the research data.
3.5 Data Analysis Plan
A data analysis plan is a roadmap for how we organize and analyze survey
data and it should help to achieve objectives that relate to the goal we set
before we started survey. Data collection method is primary data collection
as we are collecting data via questionnaire. We intended to use SPSS
software for data analysis. We also plan to use different statistical tools to

13 | P a g e
measure frequency, factor analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive
statistics, hypothesis testing and many other advanced tools so based on the
statistical result, we derived the proper interpretation and conclusion.
4. Results
4.1 Descriptive Statistics
Descriptive statistic is a summary statistic that quantitatively describes and
summarizes features from a collection of information. Although we did not
gather data from any person but just to reach any particular and certain
conclusion, we assume that we will collect data from person who is must
above 25 and below 35 and 50 pc population is less than 30 years and
remaining 50 pc population is more than 30 years and we also assume that
we are supposed to do hypothesis testing on 384 peoples. 80 pc of 384
people is male whereas remaining 20 pc population is female. 25 pc
population cover the lower-class participants, 50 pc population covers the
middle-class participants and remaining 25 pc population cover the upper-
class participants. Whereas all, 100 pc population will be based on different
areas of Karachi.
4.2 Inferential Statistics
Inferential statistics allows to make predictions or inferences from that data
with inferential statistics, we take data from samples and generalize about a
population. It is a conclusion reached on the basis of evidence and
reasoning. Although we did not gather data from any person but just to reach
any particular and certain conclusion, we assume that we have collected
data from our sample. First, we would account for estimating parameters.
This means taking a statistic from sample data i.e., sample mean and using
it to say something about a population parameter i.e., population mean.
Secondly, we would describe hypothesis tests. This is where we can use
sample data to answer research questions, so we assume that we conclude
this research based on sample data gather from participants we reached at
the point that our research hypothesis 1 is accepted because sig value
is < 0.05 and we also assume that we used different statistical tools to
measure frequency, factor analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive
statistics, correlational value, hypothesis testing and many other advanced
tools so based on the statistical result Hypothesis 1 is accepted. It is
alternative hypothesis and Hypothesis 2 is rejected it is null hypothesis.
H1: There is negative/inverse relationship between utilization of tobacco
and Negative Marketing. (Alternative Hypothesis)
H2: There is no relationship between Utilization of tobacco and Negative
Marketing.

14 | P a g e
4.3 Hypothesis Assessment Summary
Although we did not gather data from any person but just to reach any
particular and certain conclusion, we assume that we conclude this research
based on sample data gather from participants we reached at the point that
our research hypothesis 1 ‘There is negative/inverse relationship between
utilization of tobacco and Negative Marketing’ is accepted because we
assume that we used different statistical tools to measure frequency, factor
analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing and
many other advanced tools so based on the statistical result Hypothesis 1 is
accepted whereas hypothesis 2 ‘There is no relationship between Utilization
of tobacco and Negative Marketing’ is rejected.
5. Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation
We conducted research on negative marketing and its effect on utilization of unsafe
products. We choose tobacco from unsafe products. The tobacco industry uses a
variety of different marketing and promotion tools to influence customer preference
and increase the rate of new customers. All major businesses utilize marketing and
promotional plans to promote their product to the public. The advertising goal of
the company is to make the product appear desirable to a specific population in
order to increase the sales of the product. In the case of tobacco companies, there
are many different marketing and promotional strategies that are used to sell
tobacco products to indigent populations.
After conducting complete research, we assume that we concluded this research
based on sample data gather from participants we reached at the point that there is
negative/inverse relationship between utilization of tobacco and Negative
Marketing. The presentation of cigarettes in films is also important to the tobacco
industry as it communicates continued social acceptability of smoking. The tobacco
industry has had a long-term relationship with Hollywood. Study showed that 87%
of the movies contained at least one incidence of tobacco use, 28% contained a
minimum of one brand appearance, 8% had actor/actress endorsements, and 24%
had background tobacco appearances. (Lee et al., 2004)
Furthermore, tobacco industry gains additional promotional advertising by giving
away free items to the public with the tobacco company’s brand or logo represented
on the free item. Another study indicated that young adults between the ages of 25
and 32 were the most likely to own a tobacco promotional item, and the willingness
to use a promotional item was highest in adolescents 20 to 22 years of age.
Recommendation of this report is to ban on presentation of tobacco in films as it
will useless that at one side, we are discouraging utilization on tobacco but at the
same time we are continuing social acceptability of utilization of tobacco.
Government should account for the investor who invest in the promotional
activities by the tobacco industry. This part of promotional strategy should also be
observed that few tobacco companies distribute give away such as t-shirts, hats,

15 | P a g e
lighters, bags, diaries etc. to its customers and these are labelled by tobacco
products and brand specified for the sake of advertisement. Obtaining a sports bag,
an item of clothing, or any other kind of gear with a cigarette brand logo on it leads
to reliably predicts the progression to established smoking in adolescents this form
of advertising also escapes the mandatory health warning and may create the
impression that tobacco products are socially acceptable, and it indicates that there
is tolerance in the society for tobacco products. (Lee et al., 2004) These kinds of
promotional activities must be avoided to demotivate utilization of tobacco. If these
advertisements are not going to stop by Government, so there will be no significant
change on utilization of tobacco by negative marketing of tobacco products.

16 | P a g e
References
Cui, D. (1974). Demarketing.37(October), 51–57.
Lee,D., Cutler, B. D., & Burns, J. (2004). The marketing and demarketing of tobacco products to
low-income African-Americans. Health Marketing Quarterly,22(2),51–68.
https://doi.org/10.1300/J026v22n02_04
Lefebvre,R. C., & Kotler, P. (2011). Design thinking, demarketing and behavioral economics:
Fostering interdisciplinary growth in social marketing. The SAGE Handbook of Social
Marketing,January,80–94. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201008.n6
Moore, R. S. (2005). The sociological impact of attitudes toward smoking: Secondary effects of
the demarketing of smoking. Journal of Social Psychology,145(6),703–718.
https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.6.704-718
Ramirez, E., Tajdini, S., & David, M. E. (2017). The Effects of Proenvironmental Demarketing
on Consumer Attitudes and ActualConsumption. Journal of Marketing Theory and
Practice, 25(3),291–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2017.1311219
Raut, U., & Pawar,P. (2012). An analysis of perception of tobacco consumers towards the de-
Marketing of tobacco product(s). Abhinav National Monthly Refereed Journal Of Research
In Commerce & Management,1,Vol.1, Issue .10, pp. 114-121,.
Shiu, E., Hassan,L. M., & Walsh, G. (2009). Demarketing tobacco through governmental
policies - The 4Ps revisited. Journal of Business Research,62(2),269–278.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.034
Appendix
As we have mentioned many places in this research paper that we did not collect data but
due to obtain certain conclusion, we assumed that we collected data and asked participants
to answer few questions. According to published research, few questions are as follows.
a) Does advertising always advantageous for diminishing the use of tobacco?
b) Is the (health warning) picture present on tobacco products changes the users’ attitude
towards the use tobacco product, positive to negative?
c) Should the law be stronger against use of tobacco in public places?
d) Should Government increase the level of de-marketing of tobacco products?
e) Should Government take an active role in the de-marketing of tobacco products?
f) Is the De-marketing most effective strategy for reducing the demand for tobacco
products?
g) Is the Publishing information about adverse effects of tobacco will reduce the use of
tobacco products?
h) Should Government restrict smoking in public places.
These questions are derived by published research. (Raut & Pawar, 2012)

Negative Marketing Effect on Utilization of Unsafe Products

More Related Content

More from Abdul Aziz Afzaal Siddiqui (10)

Recently uploaded (20)

Negative Marketing Effect on Utilization of Unsafe Products