SlideShare a Scribd company logo
© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
The Post-Election National
           Labor Relations Board
           Presented by:
           Mark G. Jacobs




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
The Current Board




   Mark Gaston Pearce,          Sharon Block   Richard F. Griffin, Jr.
   Chairman



© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
The Acting General Counsel (“AGC”)




                                Lafe Solomon




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Section 7 – Employee “Bill of Rights”

  Employees shall have the right to:
         • Self-organization.
         • Form, join, or assist labor organization.
         • Engage in other concerted activities for the purposes of:
             − Collective bargaining or
             − Other mutual aid or protection.
  Applies to union and non-union employers




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Section 7 – Employee “Bill of Rights”

  Protected concerted activity
         • Typically 2 or more employees acting together to attempt to
           improve their terms and conditions of employment.
         • Employees are protected against retaliation for discussing or
           complaining about terms and conditions of employment.




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Active Issues Affecting Union and Non-Union
 Employers
  Notice Posting
  At-Will Disclaimers
  Confidentiality of Investigations
  Off-Duty Access
  Social Media




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
NLRB Notice Posting
  Originally scheduled to take
   effect April 30, 2012 -
   currently on hold
  Covers most private sector
   employers – with or without
   unions
  Must post in “conspicuous
   places” where employer
   customarily posts personnel
   rules, policies or
   employment notices

© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
At-Will Disclaimers

  Handbooks, offer letters, etc.
  Policy example:
         • “I further agree that the at will employment relationship
           cannot be amended, modified, or altered in any way.”
         • ALJ found that the above language violated the NLRA
           because an employee may “reasonably” conclude that the at-
           will status cannot even be changed through collective
           bargaining.




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
At-Will Disclaimers

  Acting General Counsel:
         • Overly broad “at-will” disclaimers chill Section 7 Rights.
         • Employees should not be led to believe that at-will status
             can never change.




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
At-Will Disclaimers

 Mimi’s Café
       • “The relationship between you and Mimi's Cafe is referred to
           as employment at will… No representative of the Company
           has authority to enter into any agreement contrary to the
           foregoing ‘employment at will’ relationship…”




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
At-Will Disclaimers

  Rocha Transportation
         • “Employment with Rocha Transportation is employment at-
             will… No manager, supervisor, or employee of Rocha
             Transportation has any authority to enter into an agreement
             for employment for any specific period of time or to make an
             agreement for employment other than at-will. Only the
             president of the Company has the authority to make any such
             agreement and then only in writing.”




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Confidentiality of Investigations

  Blanket Confidentiality Provisions
  NLRB says employers must show something more than a
   “generalized concern with protecting the integrity of the
   investigation.”
  Conflicts with EEOC guidance?




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Confidentiality of Investigations

  Banner Health System – July 30, 2012
         • Internal investigation re alternative equipment sterilization
           procedures. Human resources asked employee not to discuss
           the investigation with others until she concluded the
           investigation. No threat of discipline for doing otherwise.
         • The NLRB held that the confidentiality directive amounted to
           a rule that “had a reasonable tendency to coerce employees,
           and so constituted an unlawful restraint of Section 7 rights,”
           regardless of whether or not the employer threatened
           disciplinary action for breaching confidentiality.


© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Confidentiality of Investigations

  Banner Health System – July 30, 2012
         • The NLRB stated that the employer should have first made a
             determination “that it has a legitimate business justification
             that outweighs employees’ Section 7 rights.”
                 − An employer’s “generalized concern with protecting the
                   integrity of its investigations is insufficient to outweigh
                   employees’ Section 7 rights.” Rather, the employer should
                   have determined whether, in this particular case, it needed to
                   protect witnesses, evidence or testimony or prevent a cover-
                   up, which would presumably justify an instruction to maintain
                   confidentiality.


© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Off-Duty Access

  “Off-duty employees are not allowed to enter or re-enter the
     interior of the Hospital or any other work area outside the
     Hospital except to visit a patient, receive medical treatment
     or to conduct hospital-related business.
       • An off-duty employee is defined as an employee who has
         completed his/her assigned shift.
       • Hospital-related business is defined as the pursuit of the
         employee’s normal duties or duties as specifically directed by
         management.
       • Any employee who violates this policy will be subject to
         disciplinary action.”

© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Off-Duty Access

  NLRB said the policy violated the NLRA because it gives
   employers “unlimited discretion to decide when and why
   employees may access the facility.”
  The Board asked – Would a “reasonable” employee reading
   the policy believe that he or she could come onto the
   employer’s property when off-duty and performs activities
   protected under Section 7 of the Act?




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Social Media

  May 30, 2012 – AGC issued Report of the Acting General
   Counsel Concerning Social Media Cases
     • Memo reviewed numerous employer social media policies
       that had been found unlawful by the Board.
  Common Theme – Policies restricting employees from
   criticizing the employer’s labor policies or treatment of
   employees are going to be found to violate Section 7.
  Common Theme – Policies that have specific examples
   showing that the policy is not meant to prohibit criticism of
   employer’s labor policies more likely to be lawful.


© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Social Media – NLRB Unlawful

  “If you enjoy blogging or using online social networking sites
   such as Facebook and YouTube…please note that there are
   guidelines to follow if you plan to mention [Employer] or your
   employment with [Employer] in these online vehicles. Don’t
   release confidential guest, team member or company
   information. . . .”
  NLRB says unlawful because: “…would reasonably be
   interpreted as prohibiting employees from discussing and
   disclosing information regarding their own conditions of
   employment, as well as the conditions of employment of
   employees other than themselves…”


© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Social Media – NLRB Lawful

  “Maintain the confidentiality of [Employer] trade secrets and
     private or confidential information. Trades secrets may
     include information regarding the development of systems,
     processes, products, know-how and technology. Do not post
     internal reports, policies, procedures or other internal
     business-related confidential communications.”




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Social Media – NLRB Unlawful

  “Treat Everyone With Respect: Offensive, demeaning, abusive
   or inappropriate remarks are as out of place online as they
   are offline…”
  NLRB says unlawful because “…this provision proscribes a
   broad spectrum of communications that would include protected
   criticisms of the Employer’s labor policies or treatment of
   employees.”




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Social Media – NLRB Lawful
  “Nevertheless, if you decide to post complaints or criticism, avoid
     using statements, photographs, video or audio that reasonably
     could be viewed as malicious, obscene, threatening or
     intimidating, that disparage customers, members, associates or
     suppliers, or that might constitute harassment or bullying.
     Examples of such conduct might include offensive posts meant to
     intentionally harm someone’s reputation or posts that could
     contribute to a hostile work environment on the basis of race, sex,
     disability, religion or any other status protected by law or company
     policy.”




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
The Year Ahead

   “Protected Concerted Activity” charges in the non-union
    setting are expected to increase.
   More NLRB rulemaking
   More labor friendly decisions




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Contact Information
                                       Mark G. Jacobs
                                mjacobs@armstrongteasdale.com
                                        314.621.5070




© 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP

More Related Content

PDF
Fair Work Bill sub April 2013
PPTX
Ethical decision making-technology and privacy in the workplace
PPT
Employee Rights
PPT
Chapter 13 Employee Rights and Discipline
PPTX
Legal Issues In Human Resources
PPT
Unit 201 Employee Rights & Responsibilities
PDF
HR Trends Among Law Professionals
PPT
Emp Rights & Responsibility
Fair Work Bill sub April 2013
Ethical decision making-technology and privacy in the workplace
Employee Rights
Chapter 13 Employee Rights and Discipline
Legal Issues In Human Resources
Unit 201 Employee Rights & Responsibilities
HR Trends Among Law Professionals
Emp Rights & Responsibility

What's hot (20)

PPT
Chapter 16 Employee Rights and Discipline
PDF
Is the person working for you an employee?
PPT
Legal issues in Human Resources Management | File A Complaint
PDF
2017_NLRB_Handbook_Webinar_2.8.17
PPTX
EMPLOYMENT LAW AND EMPLOYEES RIGHT - J.I. Augustine
PPT
Why Employees Sue (Dgk Presentation)
PPT
Navigating the legal landscape in 2015
PPTX
Top Ten Reasons Employees Sue Their Employer
PDF
Employee Rights
PPT
Employee rights and hr communications
PDF
Kansas City Labor and Employment Roundtable
PDF
Employment Law Tool Box
PDF
Fisher & Phillips LLP Labor Letter March 2014
PDF
Empire HR September Bulletin
PPT
Chapter 17
PDF
Take steps to increase HR Compliance and stay Competitive
PDF
Employment Law Tool Kit
PPT
HRDM Module16
PPT
Business Ethic Chap 6: Ethical Decision Making - Employer Responsibilities an...
Chapter 16 Employee Rights and Discipline
Is the person working for you an employee?
Legal issues in Human Resources Management | File A Complaint
2017_NLRB_Handbook_Webinar_2.8.17
EMPLOYMENT LAW AND EMPLOYEES RIGHT - J.I. Augustine
Why Employees Sue (Dgk Presentation)
Navigating the legal landscape in 2015
Top Ten Reasons Employees Sue Their Employer
Employee Rights
Employee rights and hr communications
Kansas City Labor and Employment Roundtable
Employment Law Tool Box
Fisher & Phillips LLP Labor Letter March 2014
Empire HR September Bulletin
Chapter 17
Take steps to increase HR Compliance and stay Competitive
Employment Law Tool Kit
HRDM Module16
Business Ethic Chap 6: Ethical Decision Making - Employer Responsibilities an...
Ad

Similar to The Post-Election National Labor Relations Board (20)

PDF
Whistleblower and Retaliation Claims
PPT
Navigating the NLRB
PPTX
"The Importance of Being Earnest" How to Dodge Legal Pitfalls that Confront F...
PDF
Trends in Wage and Hour Claims
PPTX
Oregon Employment Law Update May 2012 (00259821)
PPTX
Super Sized Strikes: Nonunion Strikes Can Burn Unprepared Employers
PDF
The Alphabet Soup of Leave Administration in the Workplace
PDF
Compliance Overview - Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
PPTX
Surveying the New Labor Law Landscape: A Rocky Road Ahead
DOCX
54Chapter 3 • The Legal Context54Chapter 3 • The Legal Conte.docx
PPTX
Professional ethical conduct
PDF
Recent NLRB Rulings and Their Impact on Non-Union Employers
PPTX
Termination Tips and Traps
DOC
Legislation and Human Resources
DOCX
Employee handbook template 0777
DOCX
In various occupations, workers may be prohibited from exe.docx
DOC
Legislation and Human Resources
PDF
The Art Of Hiring Smart
DOCX
Breach of an Implied ContractA small number of employees includi.docx
PDF
Effective collective bargaining & negotiation skills
Whistleblower and Retaliation Claims
Navigating the NLRB
"The Importance of Being Earnest" How to Dodge Legal Pitfalls that Confront F...
Trends in Wage and Hour Claims
Oregon Employment Law Update May 2012 (00259821)
Super Sized Strikes: Nonunion Strikes Can Burn Unprepared Employers
The Alphabet Soup of Leave Administration in the Workplace
Compliance Overview - Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Surveying the New Labor Law Landscape: A Rocky Road Ahead
54Chapter 3 • The Legal Context54Chapter 3 • The Legal Conte.docx
Professional ethical conduct
Recent NLRB Rulings and Their Impact on Non-Union Employers
Termination Tips and Traps
Legislation and Human Resources
Employee handbook template 0777
In various occupations, workers may be prohibited from exe.docx
Legislation and Human Resources
The Art Of Hiring Smart
Breach of an Implied ContractA small number of employees includi.docx
Effective collective bargaining & negotiation skills
Ad

More from Armstrong Teasdale (20)

PPTX
How to Avoid TROUBLE: Legal Ethics for In House Counsel Featuring Larry Tucker
PDF
Don't be SORRY for Data Breach Missteps Featuring: Dan Nelson
PDF
Armstrong Teasdale Kansas City Employment & Labor Seminar Featuring: Dan O'To...
PDF
Armstrong Teasdale Employment & Labor Seminar Featuring: Dan O'Toole, J.P. Ha...
PPTX
Drop the Phone & Drive: Limits on Lawyer Communications with Non-Lawyers Feat...
PPTX
Cyber Readiness in the Securities and Brokerage Industries Featuring Armstron...
PPTX
Challenging the Validity of a Patent Before the PTAB Featuring Scott Eidson &...
PPTX
Multijurisdictional practice issues for traveling lawyers ethics michael_downey
PPTX
BUCKLE UP! How the NLRB is Changing the Rules of the Road
PPTX
China 2014: Law Changes and Opportunities in 7% GDP Growth Environment
PDF
Employment & Labor Seminar Presentation 2014 - Kansas City
PDF
Avoiding Legal Road Hazards While Traveling the Interactive Web
PDF
Employment & Labor Seminar Presentation 2014 - St. Louis
PDF
2014 Missouri Legislative Preview -Kansas City
PDF
2014 Missouri Legislative Preview-St. Louis
PPTX
Fundamental Intellectual Property Strategies
PPTX
USLFG Corporate & Securities Presentation
PPTX
Sense and Sensibility: The Pros and Cons of New Alternatives To Patent Litiga...
PPTX
How to Guide Your Employee During the Clearance Process
PDF
Great Expectations: A Guide to Satisfying Clients through Accurate Valuation ...
How to Avoid TROUBLE: Legal Ethics for In House Counsel Featuring Larry Tucker
Don't be SORRY for Data Breach Missteps Featuring: Dan Nelson
Armstrong Teasdale Kansas City Employment & Labor Seminar Featuring: Dan O'To...
Armstrong Teasdale Employment & Labor Seminar Featuring: Dan O'Toole, J.P. Ha...
Drop the Phone & Drive: Limits on Lawyer Communications with Non-Lawyers Feat...
Cyber Readiness in the Securities and Brokerage Industries Featuring Armstron...
Challenging the Validity of a Patent Before the PTAB Featuring Scott Eidson &...
Multijurisdictional practice issues for traveling lawyers ethics michael_downey
BUCKLE UP! How the NLRB is Changing the Rules of the Road
China 2014: Law Changes and Opportunities in 7% GDP Growth Environment
Employment & Labor Seminar Presentation 2014 - Kansas City
Avoiding Legal Road Hazards While Traveling the Interactive Web
Employment & Labor Seminar Presentation 2014 - St. Louis
2014 Missouri Legislative Preview -Kansas City
2014 Missouri Legislative Preview-St. Louis
Fundamental Intellectual Property Strategies
USLFG Corporate & Securities Presentation
Sense and Sensibility: The Pros and Cons of New Alternatives To Patent Litiga...
How to Guide Your Employee During the Clearance Process
Great Expectations: A Guide to Satisfying Clients through Accurate Valuation ...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
2 - Self & Personality 587689213yiuedhwejbmansbeakjrk
PDF
Environmental Law Communication: Strategies for Advocacy (www.kiu.ac.ug)
PDF
Introduction to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
PDF
NEW - FEES STRUCTURES (01-july-2024).pdf
PDF
533158074-Saudi-Arabia-Companies-List-Contact.pdf
PDF
ANALYZING THE OPPORTUNITIES OF DIGITAL MARKETING IN BANGLADESH TO PROVIDE AN ...
PDF
Charisse Litchman: A Maverick Making Neurological Care More Accessible
PPTX
chapter 2 entrepreneurship full lecture ppt
PPTX
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
PDF
ICv2 White Paper - Gen Con Trade Day 2025
DOCX
80 DE ÔN VÀO 10 NĂM 2023vhkkkjjhhhhjjjj
PPT
Lecture 3344;;,,(,(((((((((((((((((((((((
PDF
PMB 401-Identification-of-Potential-Biotechnological-Products.pdf
PPTX
IITM - FINAL Option - 01 - 12.08.25.pptx
DOCX
Center Enamel Powering Innovation and Resilience in the Italian Chemical Indu...
PPTX
TRAINNING, DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL.pptx
PPTX
Board-Reporting-Package-by-Umbrex-5-23-23.pptx
PDF
#1 Safe and Secure Verified Cash App Accounts for Purchase.pdf
PDF
Ron Thomas - Top Influential Business Leaders Shaping the Modern Industry – 2025
PPTX
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
2 - Self & Personality 587689213yiuedhwejbmansbeakjrk
Environmental Law Communication: Strategies for Advocacy (www.kiu.ac.ug)
Introduction to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
NEW - FEES STRUCTURES (01-july-2024).pdf
533158074-Saudi-Arabia-Companies-List-Contact.pdf
ANALYZING THE OPPORTUNITIES OF DIGITAL MARKETING IN BANGLADESH TO PROVIDE AN ...
Charisse Litchman: A Maverick Making Neurological Care More Accessible
chapter 2 entrepreneurship full lecture ppt
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
ICv2 White Paper - Gen Con Trade Day 2025
80 DE ÔN VÀO 10 NĂM 2023vhkkkjjhhhhjjjj
Lecture 3344;;,,(,(((((((((((((((((((((((
PMB 401-Identification-of-Potential-Biotechnological-Products.pdf
IITM - FINAL Option - 01 - 12.08.25.pptx
Center Enamel Powering Innovation and Resilience in the Italian Chemical Indu...
TRAINNING, DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL.pptx
Board-Reporting-Package-by-Umbrex-5-23-23.pptx
#1 Safe and Secure Verified Cash App Accounts for Purchase.pdf
Ron Thomas - Top Influential Business Leaders Shaping the Modern Industry – 2025
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025

The Post-Election National Labor Relations Board

  • 1. © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 2. The Post-Election National Labor Relations Board Presented by: Mark G. Jacobs © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 3. The Current Board Mark Gaston Pearce, Sharon Block Richard F. Griffin, Jr. Chairman © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 4. The Acting General Counsel (“AGC”) Lafe Solomon © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 5. Section 7 – Employee “Bill of Rights”  Employees shall have the right to: • Self-organization. • Form, join, or assist labor organization. • Engage in other concerted activities for the purposes of: − Collective bargaining or − Other mutual aid or protection.  Applies to union and non-union employers © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 6. Section 7 – Employee “Bill of Rights”  Protected concerted activity • Typically 2 or more employees acting together to attempt to improve their terms and conditions of employment. • Employees are protected against retaliation for discussing or complaining about terms and conditions of employment. © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 7. Active Issues Affecting Union and Non-Union Employers  Notice Posting  At-Will Disclaimers  Confidentiality of Investigations  Off-Duty Access  Social Media © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 8. NLRB Notice Posting  Originally scheduled to take effect April 30, 2012 - currently on hold  Covers most private sector employers – with or without unions  Must post in “conspicuous places” where employer customarily posts personnel rules, policies or employment notices © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 9. At-Will Disclaimers  Handbooks, offer letters, etc.  Policy example: • “I further agree that the at will employment relationship cannot be amended, modified, or altered in any way.” • ALJ found that the above language violated the NLRA because an employee may “reasonably” conclude that the at- will status cannot even be changed through collective bargaining. © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 10. At-Will Disclaimers  Acting General Counsel: • Overly broad “at-will” disclaimers chill Section 7 Rights. • Employees should not be led to believe that at-will status can never change. © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 11. At-Will Disclaimers  Mimi’s Café • “The relationship between you and Mimi's Cafe is referred to as employment at will… No representative of the Company has authority to enter into any agreement contrary to the foregoing ‘employment at will’ relationship…” © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 12. At-Will Disclaimers  Rocha Transportation • “Employment with Rocha Transportation is employment at- will… No manager, supervisor, or employee of Rocha Transportation has any authority to enter into an agreement for employment for any specific period of time or to make an agreement for employment other than at-will. Only the president of the Company has the authority to make any such agreement and then only in writing.” © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 13. Confidentiality of Investigations  Blanket Confidentiality Provisions  NLRB says employers must show something more than a “generalized concern with protecting the integrity of the investigation.”  Conflicts with EEOC guidance? © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 14. Confidentiality of Investigations  Banner Health System – July 30, 2012 • Internal investigation re alternative equipment sterilization procedures. Human resources asked employee not to discuss the investigation with others until she concluded the investigation. No threat of discipline for doing otherwise. • The NLRB held that the confidentiality directive amounted to a rule that “had a reasonable tendency to coerce employees, and so constituted an unlawful restraint of Section 7 rights,” regardless of whether or not the employer threatened disciplinary action for breaching confidentiality. © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 15. Confidentiality of Investigations  Banner Health System – July 30, 2012 • The NLRB stated that the employer should have first made a determination “that it has a legitimate business justification that outweighs employees’ Section 7 rights.” − An employer’s “generalized concern with protecting the integrity of its investigations is insufficient to outweigh employees’ Section 7 rights.” Rather, the employer should have determined whether, in this particular case, it needed to protect witnesses, evidence or testimony or prevent a cover- up, which would presumably justify an instruction to maintain confidentiality. © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 16. Off-Duty Access  “Off-duty employees are not allowed to enter or re-enter the interior of the Hospital or any other work area outside the Hospital except to visit a patient, receive medical treatment or to conduct hospital-related business. • An off-duty employee is defined as an employee who has completed his/her assigned shift. • Hospital-related business is defined as the pursuit of the employee’s normal duties or duties as specifically directed by management. • Any employee who violates this policy will be subject to disciplinary action.” © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 17. Off-Duty Access  NLRB said the policy violated the NLRA because it gives employers “unlimited discretion to decide when and why employees may access the facility.”  The Board asked – Would a “reasonable” employee reading the policy believe that he or she could come onto the employer’s property when off-duty and performs activities protected under Section 7 of the Act? © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 18. Social Media  May 30, 2012 – AGC issued Report of the Acting General Counsel Concerning Social Media Cases • Memo reviewed numerous employer social media policies that had been found unlawful by the Board.  Common Theme – Policies restricting employees from criticizing the employer’s labor policies or treatment of employees are going to be found to violate Section 7.  Common Theme – Policies that have specific examples showing that the policy is not meant to prohibit criticism of employer’s labor policies more likely to be lawful. © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 19. Social Media – NLRB Unlawful  “If you enjoy blogging or using online social networking sites such as Facebook and YouTube…please note that there are guidelines to follow if you plan to mention [Employer] or your employment with [Employer] in these online vehicles. Don’t release confidential guest, team member or company information. . . .”  NLRB says unlawful because: “…would reasonably be interpreted as prohibiting employees from discussing and disclosing information regarding their own conditions of employment, as well as the conditions of employment of employees other than themselves…” © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 20. Social Media – NLRB Lawful  “Maintain the confidentiality of [Employer] trade secrets and private or confidential information. Trades secrets may include information regarding the development of systems, processes, products, know-how and technology. Do not post internal reports, policies, procedures or other internal business-related confidential communications.” © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 21. Social Media – NLRB Unlawful  “Treat Everyone With Respect: Offensive, demeaning, abusive or inappropriate remarks are as out of place online as they are offline…”  NLRB says unlawful because “…this provision proscribes a broad spectrum of communications that would include protected criticisms of the Employer’s labor policies or treatment of employees.” © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 22. Social Media – NLRB Lawful  “Nevertheless, if you decide to post complaints or criticism, avoid using statements, photographs, video or audio that reasonably could be viewed as malicious, obscene, threatening or intimidating, that disparage customers, members, associates or suppliers, or that might constitute harassment or bullying. Examples of such conduct might include offensive posts meant to intentionally harm someone’s reputation or posts that could contribute to a hostile work environment on the basis of race, sex, disability, religion or any other status protected by law or company policy.” © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 23. The Year Ahead  “Protected Concerted Activity” charges in the non-union setting are expected to increase.  More NLRB rulemaking  More labor friendly decisions © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • 24. Contact Information Mark G. Jacobs mjacobs@armstrongteasdale.com 314.621.5070 © 2013 Armstrong Teasdale LLP