SlideShare a Scribd company logo
   Systematic
   Convenience
   Purposive




   Population
    Genaralizability

   Ecological
    Genearalizability
 Every nth individual in the population list is
  selected.
 eg: the principal of a school has 1000
  students, she wants to know how students feel
  about the new menu at cafeteria, so the
  principal:-
 1. get a list of the student’s name (in
  alphabetical order).
 2. she select every 10th student until she has a
  sample of 100 students to be interviewed.
 PERIODICITY-a   marked bias sample caused by
  the arrangement pattern of individual on the
  list accidentally coincides with the sampling
  interval.
 eg: grouped by gpa(grade point average),
       high/low interval: only good/poor graded
  get chosen.

Therefore, researchers should carefully
 examine the list and avoid bias.
CONVENIENCE SAMPLING
A    convenience sample is a group of
    individuals who conveniently available.

  samples:
1. first 50 people who walk in.
2. interview people at downtown.
3. two front rows students.
 Bias-
 1. not downtown = not interviewed
 2. unwilling = not interviewed
 3. willing = strong opinion
 4. interview time = at work


 Ingeneral, convenience sample cannot be
  considered representative of any population
  and should be avoided.
PURPOSIVE SAMPLING
 Based on previous knowledge of a population and
  the specific purpose of the research,researcher
  use personal judgement to select a sample.
 eg:SUITABLE SAMPLE
 a. 2 good students,2 average & 2 weak
 b. sample from Retired Workers Association
 eg: sample know the target
 A. people in charge of school
 B. people with experience


THUS, the only challenge with purposive sampling is the
  researcher’s previous knowledge must be thorough.
 Sample  should be as large as a researcher
  can obtain with a reasonable expenditure of
  time and energy.
 Ideals;
 100 samples for DESCRIPTIVE STUDY
 50 samples for CORRELATION STUDY
 30 samples in each group for EXPERIMENTAL
  STUDY& CAUSAL-COMPARATIVE STUDY
 External Validity = the result of a study can be
  generalised from sample to population.
 Ecological generalizability = result of a study can
  be generalised to other settings.
 Population generalizability = result of study can
  be generalised to the intended population
-representativeness: relevant characteristics
Overlooked “method”-random student=random
  teacher=random result.
Lost subject effect representativeness, researcher
  who lost 10 % sample are advised to
  acknowledge this limitation.
 1. researcher should describe the sample
  thoroughly; reader judge the result validity.
 2. Replication; repeat the study on different
  group or situation. If result is the same;
  generalise it.

More Related Content

DOCX
Guidelines for article review assignment
PDF
Article Review-Writing Sample
PPT
Nonrandom sampling
PPTX
How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education
PPTX
How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education
PPT
Sampling and instrumentation
PDF
Session 5_Sampling strategy_Intake Dr Emmanuel.pdf
PPTX
lecture 8.pptx
Guidelines for article review assignment
Article Review-Writing Sample
Nonrandom sampling
How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education
How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education
Sampling and instrumentation
Session 5_Sampling strategy_Intake Dr Emmanuel.pdf
lecture 8.pptx

Similar to Nonrandom sampling (1) (20)

PDF
Sampling Design in qualitative Research.pdf
PPT
Sampling 111121003751-phpapp01
PPTX
Sample_Designs[1] (1).pptx presentation on education
PPTX
Sampling
PPTX
sampling methods
PPTX
PPT
Sampling techniques: Systematic & Purposive Sampling
PPTX
5. the sample design (research methodology).pptx
PPT
604.2021SAMPLING.4.ppt
PPT
Sample method
PPTX
Research on sampling
PPT
Sampling
PPT
Sampling method in research
PPT
Phyton class by Pavan - Study notes incl
PPTX
Sampling class phd aku
PPTX
Sampling class
PPT
43911
PPT
Tqm sampling
PPT
Tqm sampling
PPT
Tqm sampling 3
Sampling Design in qualitative Research.pdf
Sampling 111121003751-phpapp01
Sample_Designs[1] (1).pptx presentation on education
Sampling
sampling methods
Sampling techniques: Systematic & Purposive Sampling
5. the sample design (research methodology).pptx
604.2021SAMPLING.4.ppt
Sample method
Research on sampling
Sampling
Sampling method in research
Phyton class by Pavan - Study notes incl
Sampling class phd aku
Sampling class
43911
Tqm sampling
Tqm sampling
Tqm sampling 3
Ad

More from Adibah H. Mutalib (8)

PDF
Public speaking and pbl
PDF
Pbl and language
PPTX
Presentation 070412
PPTX
Week i & ii pt. ii
PPTX
Presentation edu 702
PPT
Edu 702 group presentation (questionnaire)
DOCX
Article review yukon territory
PDF
Critical review
Public speaking and pbl
Pbl and language
Presentation 070412
Week i & ii pt. ii
Presentation edu 702
Edu 702 group presentation (questionnaire)
Article review yukon territory
Critical review
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
PDF
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
PDF
Optimiser vos workloads AI/ML sur Amazon EC2 et AWS Graviton
PPT
“AI and Expert System Decision Support & Business Intelligence Systems”
PPTX
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
PDF
Encapsulation_ Review paper, used for researhc scholars
PDF
gpt5_lecture_notes_comprehensive_20250812015547.pdf
PDF
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
PPTX
1. Introduction to Computer Programming.pptx
PDF
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
PDF
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
PPTX
Machine Learning_overview_presentation.pptx
PDF
Getting Started with Data Integration: FME Form 101
PDF
Accuracy of neural networks in brain wave diagnosis of schizophrenia
PDF
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
PPTX
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
PDF
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
Optimiser vos workloads AI/ML sur Amazon EC2 et AWS Graviton
“AI and Expert System Decision Support & Business Intelligence Systems”
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
Encapsulation_ Review paper, used for researhc scholars
gpt5_lecture_notes_comprehensive_20250812015547.pdf
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
1. Introduction to Computer Programming.pptx
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
Machine Learning_overview_presentation.pptx
Getting Started with Data Integration: FME Form 101
Accuracy of neural networks in brain wave diagnosis of schizophrenia
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II

Nonrandom sampling (1)

  • 1. Systematic  Convenience  Purposive  Population Genaralizability  Ecological Genearalizability
  • 2.  Every nth individual in the population list is selected.  eg: the principal of a school has 1000 students, she wants to know how students feel about the new menu at cafeteria, so the principal:-  1. get a list of the student’s name (in alphabetical order).  2. she select every 10th student until she has a sample of 100 students to be interviewed.
  • 3.  PERIODICITY-a marked bias sample caused by the arrangement pattern of individual on the list accidentally coincides with the sampling interval.  eg: grouped by gpa(grade point average), high/low interval: only good/poor graded get chosen. Therefore, researchers should carefully examine the list and avoid bias.
  • 4. CONVENIENCE SAMPLING A convenience sample is a group of individuals who conveniently available.  samples: 1. first 50 people who walk in. 2. interview people at downtown. 3. two front rows students.
  • 5.  Bias-  1. not downtown = not interviewed  2. unwilling = not interviewed  3. willing = strong opinion  4. interview time = at work  Ingeneral, convenience sample cannot be considered representative of any population and should be avoided.
  • 6. PURPOSIVE SAMPLING  Based on previous knowledge of a population and the specific purpose of the research,researcher use personal judgement to select a sample.  eg:SUITABLE SAMPLE  a. 2 good students,2 average & 2 weak  b. sample from Retired Workers Association  eg: sample know the target  A. people in charge of school  B. people with experience THUS, the only challenge with purposive sampling is the researcher’s previous knowledge must be thorough.
  • 7.  Sample should be as large as a researcher can obtain with a reasonable expenditure of time and energy.  Ideals;  100 samples for DESCRIPTIVE STUDY  50 samples for CORRELATION STUDY  30 samples in each group for EXPERIMENTAL STUDY& CAUSAL-COMPARATIVE STUDY
  • 8.  External Validity = the result of a study can be generalised from sample to population.  Ecological generalizability = result of a study can be generalised to other settings.  Population generalizability = result of study can be generalised to the intended population -representativeness: relevant characteristics Overlooked “method”-random student=random teacher=random result. Lost subject effect representativeness, researcher who lost 10 % sample are advised to acknowledge this limitation.
  • 9.  1. researcher should describe the sample thoroughly; reader judge the result validity.  2. Replication; repeat the study on different group or situation. If result is the same; generalise it.