ON SELECTION OF PERIODIC KERNELS PARAMETERS IN TIME SERIES PREDICTION

David C. Wyld et al. (Eds) : CST, ITCS, JSE, SIP, ARIA, DMS - 2014
pp. 01–10, 2014. © CS & IT-CSCP 2014 DOI : 10.5121/csit.2014.4101
ON SELECTION OF PERIODIC KERNELS
PARAMETERS IN TIME SERIES
PREDICTION
Marcin Michalak
Institute of Informatics, Silesian University of Technology,
ul. Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Marcin.Michalak@polsl.pl
ABSTRACT
In the paper the analysis of the periodic kernels parameters is described. Periodic kernels can
be used for the prediction task, performed as the typical regression problem. On the basis of the
Periodic Kernel Estimator (PerKE) the prediction of real time series is performed. As periodic
kernels require the setting of their parameters it is necessary to analyse their influence on the
prediction quality. This paper describes an easy methodology of finding values of parameters of
periodic kernels. It is based on grid search. Two different error measures are taken into
consideration as the prediction qualities but lead to comparable results. The methodology was
tested on benchmark and real datasets and proved to give satisfactory results.
KEYWORDS
Kernel regression, time series prediction, nonparametric regression
1. INTRODUCTION
Estimation of a regression function is a way of describing a character of a phenomenon on the
basis of the values of known variables that influence on the phenomenon. There are three main
branches of the regression methods: parametric, nonparametric, and semiparametric. In the
parametric regression the form of the dependence is assumed (the function with the finite number
of parameters) and the regression task simplifies to the estimation of the model (function)
parameters. The linear or polynomial regression are the most popular examples. In the
nonparametric regression any analytical form of the regression function can be assumed and it is
built straight from the data like in Support Vector Machines (SVM), kernel estimators, or neural
networks. The third group is the combination of the two previously described. The regression task
in this case is performed in two steps: firstly the parametric regression is applied followed by the
nonparametric.
Time series are a specific kind of data: the observed phenomenon depends of some set of
variables but also on the laps of time. The most popular and well known methods of time series
analysis and prediction are presented in [1] which first edition was in 60's of the 20th century.
In this paper the semiparametric model of regression is applied for the purpose of time series
prediction. In the previous works kernel estimators and SVM were used for this task [2][3] but

2 Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT)
these methods required mapping of the time series into a new space. Another approach was
presented in [4] where the Periodic Kernel Estimator (PerKE) was defined. It is also the
semiparametric algorithm. In the first step the regression model is built (linear or exponential) and
for the rests the nonparametric model is applied. The final prediction is the compound of two
models. The nonparametric step is the kernel regression with the specific kind of kernel function
called periodic kernel function. In the mentioned paper two kernels were defined.
Because each periodic kernel requires some parameters in this paper the analysis of the influence
of kernel parameters on prediction error becomes the point of interest. The paper is organized as
follows: it starts from ashort description of prediction and regression methods, then the PerKE
algorithm is presented. Afterwards, results of the experiments performed on time series are given.
The paper ends with conclusions and the description of further works.
2. PREDICTION AND REGRESSION MODELS
2.1. ARIMA (SARIMA) Models
SARIMA(Seasonal ARIMA) model generalizes the Box and Jenkins ARIMA model
(AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average)[1] as the connection of three simple models:
autoregression (AR), moving average (MA) and integration (I).
If B is defined as the lag operator for the time series x (‫ݔܤ‬௧ = ‫ݔ‬௧ିଵ) then the autoregressive model
of the order p(at is the white noise and will used also in other models) is given by the formula:
‫ݔ‬௧ = ߮ଵ‫ݔ‬௧ିଵ + ߮ଶ‫ݔ‬௧ିଶ + ⋯ +߮௣‫ݔ‬௧ି௣ + ܽ௧
and may be defined as:
(1 − ߮ଵ‫ܤ‬ − ߮ଶ‫ܤ‬ଶ
− ⋯ −߮௣‫ܤ‬௣
)‫ݔ‬௧ = ܽ௧
In the MA models the value of time series depends on random component at and its q delays as
follows:
‫ݔ‬௧ = ܽ௧ − θଵܽ௧ିଵ − θଶܽ௧ିଶ − ⋯ − θ௤ܽ௧ି௤
or as:
ܽ௧൫1 − θଵ‫ܤ‬ − θଶ‫ܤ‬ଶ
− ⋯ − θ௤‫ܤ‬௤
൯ = ‫ݔ‬௧
For the non-stationary time series the d operation of its differentiation is performed, described as
the component (1 - B)d
in the final equation. The full ARIMA(p, d, q) model takes the form:
൫1 − ߮ଵ‫ܤ‬ − ߮ଶ‫ܤ‬ଶ − ⋯ ߮௣‫ܤ‬௣
൯(1 − ‫)ܤ‬ௗ‫ݔ‬௧ = ܽ௧൫1 − θଵ‫ܤ‬ − θଶ‫ܤ‬ଶ − ⋯ − θ௤‫ܤ‬௤
൯
The SARIMA model is dedicated for time series that have strong periodic fluctuations. If s is the
seasonal delay the model is described as SARIMA(p, d, q)(P,D,Q)s
where P is the order of
seasonal autoregression ൫1 − Φଵ‫ܤ‬௦
− Φଶ‫ܤ‬ଶ௦
− ⋯ Φ௣‫ܤ‬௉௦
൯, Q is the order of seasonal moving
average ൫1 − Θଵ‫ܤ‬௦
− Θଶ‫ܤ‬ଶ௦
− ⋯ Θ௣‫ܤ‬௉௦
൯and D is the order of seasonal integration (1 − ‫ܤ‬௦
−
‫ܤ‬ଶ௦
− ⋯ ‫ܤ‬௉௦).
2.2. Decomposition Method
This method tries to separate several components of the time series, each of them describing the
series in the different way. Most important components are as follows:

Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT) 3
− trend component (T): the long-time characteristic of the time series,
− seasonal component (S): the periodic changes of the time series,
− cyclical component (C): repeated but non-periodic changes of the time series,
− irregular (random) component (e).
Components are usually aggregated. It may be an additive aggregation when the final predicted
value is a sum of all time series components or multiplicative aggregation when the final value is
calculated as a multiplication of all time series components. First is called additive and the final
predicted value is the sum of component time series values and the second is called multiplicative
(aggregation is the multiplication of time series values).
2.3. Periodic Kernels
Periodic kernels belong to a wide group of kernel functions that are applied for the task of
estimation of the regression function. They fulfil the typical conditions for the kernel function and
some of the specific ones. As the most important typical features of the kernel function the
following should be mentioned [5]:
− ‫׬‬ ‫ݑ݀)ݑ(ܭ‬ = 1ோ
− ∀‫ݑ‬ ∈ ܴ ‫)ݑ(ܭ‬ = ‫)ݑ−(ܭ‬
− ‫׬‬ ‫ݑ݀)ݑ(ܭݑ‬ = 0ோ
− ∀‫ݑ‬ ∈ ܴ ‫)0(ܭ‬ ≥ ‫)ݑ(ܭ‬
− ‫׬‬ ‫ݑ‬ଶ
‫ݑ݀)ݑ(ܭ‬ < ∞ோ
Furthermore, if we assume that the period of the analysed time series is Tthen there are the
following specific conditions for the periodic kernel function:
− for each݇ ∈ ܼ the value K(kT) is the strong local maximum,
− for each‫ݔ‬ ∈ ܴ ∖ ሼ0ሽ ‫)0(ܭ‬ > ‫,)ݔ(ܭ‬
− for each݊ଵ, ݊ଶ ∈ ܰ that ݊ଵ < ݊ଶ ‫݊(ܭ‬ଵ) > ‫݊(ܭ‬ଶ).
In the paper [4] two periodic kernels were defined, named First Periodic Kernel (FPK) and
Second Periodic Kernel (SPK). The formula of FPK is the multiplication of the exponential
function and the cosine:
‫)ݔ(ܭܲܨ‬ =
1
‫ܥ‬
݁ି௔|௫|
(1 + cosܾ‫)ݔ‬
The constant C assures that K is integrable to one. This value depends on the values aand b as
follows:
‫ܥ‬ = 2 න ݁௔௫
(1 + cos ܾ‫ݔ݀)ݔ‬ =
4ܽଶ
+ 2ܾଶ
ܽ(ܽଶ + ܾଶ)
ஶ
଴
In other to define the FPKit is to substitute a and b with the period T and parameterߠthat is a
function attenuation (the ratio of the two consecutive local maxima):
ܾ =
2ߨ
ܶ
ߠ =
‫ݐ(ܭ‬ + ܶ)
‫)ݐ(ܭ‬
⇒ −ܽܶ = ln ߠ ⇒ ܽ = −
ln ߠ
ܶ

Based on this substitution the following formula is obtained:
‫)ݔ(ܭ‬ =
1
‫ܥ‬
݁
ౢ౤ ഇ
೅
|௫|
൬1 + cos
2‫ߨݔ‬
ܶ
൰
‫ܥ‬ =
4ܶ ln2
ߠ + 4ܶߨଶ
− lnଷ ߠ − 4ߨଶ lnଶ ߠ
On the Figure 1. the sample FPK is presented.
Figure 1. First Periodic Kernel generated withT=5, ߠ = 0.6
The second kernel (SPK) has a following formula:
ܵܲ‫)ݔ(ܭ‬ =
1
‫ܥ‬
݁ି௔|௫|
cos୬
ܾ‫ݔ‬
where
‫ܥ‬ = 2 න ݁௔௫
cos୬
ܾ‫ݔ‬ ݀‫ݔ‬ = 2[‫ܫ‬௡]଴
ஶ
ஶ
଴
and In is an integral:
‫ܫ‬௡ = න ݁௔௫
cos௡
ܾ‫ݔ‬
The final formula for the constant C calculated recurrently is following:
‫ܥ‬ = ൭−
1
ܽ
− ෍
ܽ
(ܽଶ + 4݅ଶ) ∏ ߤ௜
௜
௞ୀ଴
௡
௜ୀଵ
൱ ෑ ߤ௜
௡
௜ୀଵ
with
ߤ଴ = 1, ߤ௜ =
2݅(2݅ − 1)
ܽଶ + 4݅ଶ
It is possible to calculate the value of the C in the analytical way when the software allows
symbolic calculation. Experiments presented in this paper were performed in Matlab and the C
was calculated in the symbolic way.
This kernel also may be defined with the period T and the attenuationߠ:

‫)ݔ(ܭ‬ =
1
‫ܥ‬
݁
ౢ౤ ഇ
మ
|௫|
cos୬
ߨ‫ݔ‬
ܶ
, ܾ(ܶ) =
ߨ
ܶ
, ܽ(ߠ) = −
ln ߠ
ܶ
The role of n parameter is to describe the ,,sharpness'' of the function in the local maxima. On the
Figure 2. the sample SPK is given.
Figure 2. Second Periodic Kernel generated with T=5, ߠ = 0.6 and n = 10
3. PERKE ALGORITHM
Periodic Kernel Estimatoris a member of the group of semiparametric (two step) methods [6][7].
Methods from this group consist of the initial parametric step and the final nonparametric one.
After the parametric step the residuals are calculated and the nonparametric part of the model tries
to explain the only variation of residuals. The final model can consists of addition or
multiplication of the basic results. In this aspect the semiparametric method is similar to the
decomposition method.
The PerKE models the residual part of the time series with the following formula:
‫)ݐ(ݔ‬ =
∑ ‫ݔ‬௧ି௜‫ݐ(ܭ‬ − ݅)௞
௜ୀଵ
∑ ‫ݐ(ܭ‬ − ݅)௞
௜ୀଵ
where k is the number of previous observation in the train sample of the time series.
It may be noticed that this equationis derived from the Nadaraya-Watson kernel estimator
[8][9]but the smoothing parameter h was removed. This may cause the situation of
oversmoothing the data. It is observed in two variants: the predicted values are overestimated
(bigger than real values) or overestimated (smaller than real values). In order to avoid this
situation the parameter called underestimation ߙ is introduced. It is the fraction of the predicted
and original value:
ߙ௜ =
‫ݔ‬෤௜
‫ݔ‬௜
The underestimation is trained in the following way: if p is an interesting prediction horizon the
last p observations from the train set are considered as the test set and predict them on the basis of
the rest of the train set. Then the vector of underestimations is defined as the vector of fractions of

predicted and real values. In the final prediction the values coming from the nonparametric step
are divided by the corresponding ߙ.
4. SELECTION OF KERNEL PARAMETERS
4.1. Discretisation of Periodic Kernels
In the experiments a simplified –a discretized – form of periodic kernels was used. Let assume
that only the values of the kernel for the period multiple are interesting: K(x) where‫ݔ‬ = ݇ܶ, ݇ ∈
ܼ. Then the formula for FPK simplifies to the following one:
‫)ܶ݇(ܭ‬ =
2
‫ܥ‬
݁|௞| ୪୬ ఏ
Discretisation of the SPK leads to the same formula. The only difference between two discretized
kernels is the value of the C constant which can be tabularised before the experiments. It speeds
up calculation because each constant C (for each demanded form of periodic kernel) was
calculated once and was read in a constant time.
On the basis of the discretized form of periodic kernels and the kernel regression formula of
residual part of the series, it might be claimed, that both types of periodic kernels give the same
results.
4.2. The Error Evaluation
The error of prediction was measured with two different quality functions:
‫ܧܲܣܯ‬ =
100
݊
෍
|‫ݕ‬௜ − ‫ݕ‬෤௜|
|‫ݕ‬௜|
௡
௜ୀଵ
ܴ‫ܧܵܯ‬ = ඩ
1
݊
෍(‫ݕ‬௜ − ‫ݕ‬෤௜)ଶ
௡
௜ୀଵ
Each of them describes a different kind of an error. The first one points the averaged absolute
error and is more resistant when the test samples have values from very wide range. The second
one measures the error in the unit of the analysed data so it can be more interpretable in some
cases.
4.3. Setting the Parameters for SPK
Let`s consider the very popular time series describing the number of passengers in America (G
series from Box and Jenkins [1]). It contains 144 monthly values of number of passengers (in
millions) between 01.1949 and 12.1960. Its natural period is 12. This time series is presented on
the Figure 3.

Figure 3. G time series
For the purpose of the analysis of an influence of the SPK parameters on the prediction accuracy
the following optimization step was performed. Instead of calculation of the C value for each
prediction task, the array of C values for the predefined periodic kernel parameters was created.
The attenuation was changing from ߠ = 0.1 to ߠ = 0.9 with the step 0.1. The sharpness was
changing from n = 2 to n = 60 with the step 2.
The error of the prediction depending on the kernel parameters is shown on the Figure 4.
Figure 4. G time series prediction error (MAPE on the left and RMSE on the right) as the function of ߠ and
sharpness
In general, it may be seen that the error of the prediction decreaseswhen the ߠincreases.
Additionally, it is observed that the influence of the sharpness is opposite. In other wordsthe
decrease of the sharpness implies the decrease of the error.
Because the period of this series is 12 (the number of months) periodic kernel parameters were
established on the basis of prediction on 144 – 12 G series values (all data without the last 12
values). Both error measures were considered. The smaller time series were called train series.
Table 1 compares the errors on the train series and on the whole series. The best results (typed
with bold font) for the train series were for ߠ = 0.9 and sharpness = 2. Performing the grid
experiment for the whole series the best results were for 0.9 and 2 (with MAPE) and for 0.9 and 4
(with RMSE) respectively. It can be seen, that on the basis of the MAPE results for train data the
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
3
3.5
4
4.5
sharpness
θ
MAPE

best values of parameters (with the assumed grid steps) were found and with the RMSE results –
almost the best.
Table 1. Comparison of best results and kernel parameters for train and whole time series.
Train series Whole series
ࣂ sharpness MAPE RMSE ࣂ Sharpness MAPE RMSE
0.9 2 3.6877 17.8085 0.9 2 3.1989 16.1038
0.9 4 3.6938 17.8752 0.9 4 3.2084 16.0972
5. REAL DATA APPLICATION
Selection of periodic kernel parameters was applied for the real time series, describing the
monthly production of heat in one of the heating plant in Poland. This series (denoted as E)
contained 97 values. The series is presented on the Figure 5.
Figure 5. E time series prediction – monthly production of heat.
PerKE algorithm was performed in three ways: periodic kernels with arbitrarily set kernel
parameters (two types of periodic kernels) and the SPK with the presented methodology of
parameters setting. Additionally, two popular time series prediction methods were used as the
reference points for kernel prediction results: SARIMA and decomposition method.
The results of all experiments are shown in the Table 2. (G series) and Table 3. (E series). In the
first case periodic kernel parameters did not depend on the chosen measure. The final prediction
quality is still better than the quality of other popular prediction methods.

Table 2. Comparison of the G time series prediction results.
method MAPE RMSE annotations
SARIMA 4.80% 26.95 (1,0,0)(2,0,0)12
decomp. 4.51% 26.60 exponential+multiplicative
FPK 3.20% 16.10
SPK 3.72% 21.00 T=12, ߠ=0.4, n =60
SPK(MAPE/RMSE) 3.20% 16.10 T=12, ߠ=0.9, n =2
Table 3. Comparison of the E time series prediction results.
method MAPE RMSE annotations
SARIMA 20.95% 10 115.91 (1,0,0)(2,0,0)12
decomp. 22.10% 9 010.87 linear+additive
FPK 69.13% 19 855.28
SPK 20.08% 8 638.12 T=12, ߠ=0.9, n =80
SPK(MAPE) 19.13% 14 735.66 T=12, ߠ=0.9, n =2
SPK(RMSE) 18.26% 15 861.22 T=12, ߠ=0.1, n =2
In the second case (E series) the selected set of periodic kernel parameters depended on the
quality measure. But for each of them the decrease of relative error is observed.
6. CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER WORKS
In the paper the analysis of the periodic kernel parameters influence on the prediction error was
analysed. Two types of periodic kernels were taken into consideration and the error of the
prediction was measured with two different methods. On the basis of the analysis of the G time
series and the E time series it may be said that the methodology of finding the periodic kernel
parameters gives satisfying results.
Further works will focus on the application of PerKE and periodic kernels to time series with the
different time interval between observations. It is expected that more differences between the two
kernels will occur. It is also possible that the sharpness will have the bigger influence on the
prediction error.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the European Union from the European Social Fund (grant
agreement number: UDA-POKL.04.01.01-106/09).
REFERENCES
[1] Box, George & Jenkins, Gwilym (1970)Time series analysis. Holden-Day, San Francisco.
[2] Michalak, Marcin (2011)“Adaptive kernel approach to the time series prediction”,Pattern Analysis
and Application, Vol. 14, pp. 283-293.
[3] Michalak, Marcin (2009)“Time series prediction using new adaptive kernel estimators”,Advances in
Intelligent and Soft Computing, Vol. 57, pp. 229-236.
[4] Michalak, Marcin (2011)“Time series prediction with periodic kernels”,Advances in Intelligent and
Soft Computing, Vol. 95, pp. 137-146.
[5] Scott, David (1992)Multivariate Density Estimation. Theory, Practice and Visualization,Wiley &
Sons.
[6] Abramson, Ian (1982) “Arbitrariness of the pilot estimator in adaptive kernel methods”,Journal of
Multivariate Analysis, Vol. 12, pp. 562-567.

[7] Hjort, Nils & Glad, Ingrid (1995)“Nonparametric density estimation with a parametric start”, Annals
of Statistics, Vol. 23, pp. 882-904.
[8] Nadaraya, Elizbar (1964)“On estimating regression”,Theory of Probability and Its Applications,Vol.
9, pp.141-142.
[9] Watson, Geoffrey (1964)“Smooth regression analysis”,Sankhya - The Indian Journal of Statistics,Vol.
26, pp. 359-372.
AUTHOR
Marcin Michalak was born in Poland in 1981. He received his M.Sc. Eng. in computer
science from the Silesian University of Technology in 2005 and Ph.D. degree in 2009
from the same university. His scientific interests is in machine learning, data mining,
rough sets and biclustering. He is an author and coauthor of over 40 scientific papers.

ON SELECTION OF PERIODIC KERNELS PARAMETERS IN TIME SERIES PREDICTION

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Similar to ON SELECTION OF PERIODIC KERNELS PARAMETERS IN TIME SERIES PREDICTION (20)

More from cscpconf (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

ON SELECTION OF PERIODIC KERNELS PARAMETERS IN TIME SERIES PREDICTION