Online group work patterns nl 2010
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like674 views
1) The study examined patterns of online group collaboration among students in an educational technology course. Two groups were analyzed - one successful "Group Dali" and one less successful "Group Matisse." 2) Analysis of interactions found that Group Dali engaged in clarification of focus, collaboration, artifact creation, and reflection/revision. Group Matisse lacked trust and weak group identity, hindering full engagement. 3) Successful groups demonstrated negotiation, research, conception, and production patterns in their work. Constraints like lack of trust and weak group identity prevented full participation in the less successful group. The importance of aspects like trust, social identity, and negotiated experience for effective online collaboration was highlighted.
Online group work patterns nl 2010
- 1. Online group work patterns: how to promote a successful collaborationTinoca, L.F.(1,2), Oliveira, I.(1,2) & Pereira, A.(1,3) (1) Departament of Education and Distance Teaching, Universidade Aberta(2) Centro de Investigação em Educação(3) Laboratório de Educação a DistânciaPortugal
- 2. Theoretical Framework:Networked LearningPeer interaction stimulates knowledge production and produces cognitive gains(Perret-Clermont et al., 1991; Dillenbourg, 1999)The instructor should act mainly as a facilitator to the learning process, (Lave & Wenger, 1991; Dillenbourg, 1999)The construction and appropriation of knowledge is highly influenced by the individuals’ social experiences (Vygotsky, 1978; Wertsch, 1991)In ODL students are characterized by their high motivation to learn, fueled by their realization that learning will help them to better perform in their professional settings. (Rovai, 2004)
- 3. Group work and knowledge convergenceThe process of group work is defined by such attributes as the students ability to have an in-depth discussion, raise points, contribute to discussions (…) and generally participate as fully and openly as possible.(McConnell, 2006)Some patterns of interactions are more productive than others for establishing a working joint problem-space that allows the group to capitalize on the resources available to solve problems and to learn from one another.(Barron, 2003)Knowledge convergence is the process by which two or more people share mutual understanding through social interaction, and is believed to reflect the fundamentally social nature of the knowledge construction process.(Jeong & Chi, 2007)Collaborative learning research suggests the need to give greater emphasis to interactional practices in order to render them more productive.(Matusov, Bell & Rogoff, 2003)
- 4. Research QuestionsWhat are the patterns that identify successful groups? What types of constraints prevent some participants from fully engaging on the group work?
- 5. The Context The class: Using ICT for Learning and Assessment(based on a Pedagogical Model for online learning by Pereira et al., 2007)The goals of this Curricular Unit included the development of the participants’ metacognitive, argumentative and evaluative competencies. More specifically they were:To be able to communicate conclusions, knowledge and reasoning clearly while being able to argument and substantiate their own point of view.To critically reflect about the usage of technologies in education.To creatively use technological artifacts with pedagogical goals.To substantiate their decisions about the use of multimedia and/or educational communication tools in a variety of settings.
- 6. The ParticipantsThe participants (36) were divided into 8 groups (with 4 to 5 participants each)Ages ranged from 30 to 452 representative groups were chosenGroup Dali 3 professional development trainers
- 8. two with previous experience in CSCL They were very successful with their final product and worked collaboratively very harmoniously.Group Matisse 3 teachers
- 9. 1 professional development trainer
- 10. one with previous experience in CSCLThey were not as successful with their final product and revealed some difficulties to collaborate effectively, resulting in anxiety and division amongst the group members.
- 11. Data collection and analysisThe analysis was conducted using Strauss and Corbin “grounded theory” approach,Each group’s processes of collaboration was analyzed, with particular emphasis to the interaction between the participants, and the artifacts that were constructed, and reconstructed, by each group on the way to their final product.From the analysis of the group interactions emerged 4 main patterns of work (McConnell , 2006).
- 12. Group Dali
- 13. Group Matisse
- 14. DALIProductionConceptionResearchR.R.Negotiation16 Fev 22 Fev 26 Fev 2 Mar 4Mar 8 Mar 10 MarN.NegN.R.Res.R.R.Conc.C.Prod.MATISSE
- 16. Answering the Research QuestionsQ1: What are the patterns that identify successful groups? Clarification of focusCollaborationCreation of artifacts Reflection over the produced sectionsRevision
- 17. Q2: What types of constraints prevent some participants from fully engagement on the group work? Lack of trust (underdevelopment of the negotiation pattern)Weak group identityAnswering the Research Questions
- 18. ConclusionsGroup work revealed to be a powerful tool.Giving the students the opportunity to engage in online group work is clearly not sufficient to assure that they will work collaboratively (Mantovani, 1994).Aspects related to ontological security and trust (Giddens,1997), as well as social identity are cornerstone.
- 19. ImplicationsSpecial care should be given to the construction of the groups. Cognitive aspects and interpersonal skills should both be taken into account.Action coordination towards a shared task has a clear effect in the participants’ negotiated identities (Giddens, 1997). The course designer should take into account the negotiated experience of self and membership of the participants.