![Epistemic
Cultures
„Those
amalgams
of
arrangements
and
mechanisms
[...]
which,
in
a
given
field,
make
up
how
we
know
what
we
know.
Epistemic
Cultures
are
cultures
that
create
and
warrant
knowledge
[...].“
Karin
Knorr
CeSna](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/unit3opensciencests2015-160104163709/85/Open-Cultures-and-Open-Innovation-Open-Science-STS-Course-2015-12-320.jpg)
Open Cultures and Open Innovation - Open Science STS Course 2015
- 1. Open Science – the be-er science? Dr. Katja Mayer Social Studies of Science and Technology SE 230 157 | 5 ECTS | 2 SST | Winter Semester 2015/16 katja.mayer@univie.ac.at @katja_mat "What science becomes in any historical era depends on what we make of it" Sandra Harding
- 2. Seminar DocumentaSon Seminar units will be documented here: h-p://openscience-‐thebe-erscience.blogspot.co.at/ ParScipants to write blog entries consisSng of: • Short abstract of following content • Summarizing course literature • Outlining discussions and related discourses (based on respecSve assignment) • SuggesSng further research, addiSonal informaSon, outlook • ~ 2500 words, to be online/handed in by Jan 6th 2016. Each Par(cipant/group will present their preliminary findings (=main discussion points) in a 10 minute recap at the beginning of the next unit The group's blog entry will be peer reviewed in the last unit. – Bernhard: Open Cultures and Open Innova(on (12.11.) – Elena: Open Access, Open EducaSon and DisrupSve Technologies (19.11.) – Steve: Open Research Data and Open Methods (26.11.) – Berry, Daniel: Ethos of Science: Reproducility and Open EvaluaSon – Lucia, Walter: CiSzen Science and DIY ExperSse (10.12.) – Anastasia: Opening Social Sciences (17.12.)
- 3. OPEN SCIENCE: PARADIGM SHIFT, MOVEMENT, REVOLUTION? 5.11.2015 Transforming Knowledge PracSces
- 4. Theories of changing knowledge producSon • ScienSfic RevoluSons • FalsificaSon • Ethos in science • Co-‐producSon • ?
- 5. Opening Science – transforming knowledge prac(ces? Recap • Which elements of Mode1 and Mode2 knowledge producSon does Open Science embrace? • What is missing? Open Science Open Access Open (Research) Data / Materials Open Source / Open Methods Open EducaSon Open EvaluaSon CiSzen Science
- 6. society novel quality control autonomy homogeneity disciplinarity acadenic context Open Science and its changing modes of knowledge producSon mode2 context of applicaSon trans-‐ disciplinarity diverse sites of knowledge producSon reflexivity quality control reconfiguraSon of insStuSons management and governance of Mode2 uncertainSes self-‐ organizaSon economic raSonality changing Sme-‐spaces • weak, middle, strong contextualizaSon • socially robust knowledge • agora
- 7. Assignment 2 deadline 11 Nov 8:00 pm Open Cultures and Open Innova(on Chesbrough, H. (2015). From Open Science to Open Innova1on. Science Business Publishing • Summarize the Open InnovaSon model as described by Chesbrough, and locate the role of universiSes and other public research organisaSon in this model. Reflect briefly in one paragraph potenSal obstacles, challenges or benefits from this model. (max 300 words) Moedas, C. (2015). Open InnovaSon, Open Science, Open to the World. Speech 22 June 2015: Brussels, ‘A new start for Europe: Opening up to an ERA of Innova1on’ Conference. Mayer, K. (2015). From Science 2.0 to Open Science: Turning rhetoric into acSon? STCSN-‐eLeBer, 3(1). • In the next unit we will be wriSng a blog-‐entry together: h-ps:// pad.okfn.org/p/openscience_blog Prepare a short list of ideas for this blog text and bring it with your laptop to class (if possible)
- 8. • Open data and content can be freely used, modified, and shared by anyone for any purpose • use (read, analyze, display) • re-‐use (re-‐analyze, modify, combine) • distributable, preserving promenance and openness Open Knowledge Open DefiniSon
- 9. DefiniSons Open Science Open Access Open (Research) Data / Materials Open Source / Open Methods Open EducaSon Open EvaluaSon CiSzen Science Open science is the idea that scienSfic knowledge of all kinds should be openly shared as early as is pracScal in the discovery process. Open strategies share the following objecSves • transparency and reproducibility • re-‐usability and new applicaSons • societal parScipaSon and feedback loops
- 10. OPEN CULTURES 12.11.2015: the diversity of
- 11. The Open Science MulSple Publics Fields researchers administraSons media policies industries ngos sciences social sciences humaniSes Epistemic Cultures PerspecSves archives History Time
- 12. Epistemic Cultures „Those amalgams of arrangements and mechanisms [...] which, in a given field, make up how we know what we know. Epistemic Cultures are cultures that create and warrant knowledge [...].“ Karin Knorr CeSna
- 13. the crowd that is you commons open source free soqware freedom from barriers cyberspace open property parScipaSon diversity mulStude acquiring means of producSon prosumers inclusion privacy open culture intellectual property music art science open hardware Cultures of Openness
- 14. Cultures of Openness Openness is an overarching concept or philosophy that is characterized by an emphasis on transparency and free, unrestricted access to knowledge and informaSon, as well as collaboraSve or cooperaSve management and decision-‐making rather than a central authority. Openness can be said to be the opposite of secrecy. (Wikipedia) is that a good (enough) definiSon?
- 15. BREAK short
- 16. h-p://pad.okfn.org/p/openscience_blog Open InnovaSon, Open Science, Open to the world a collaboraSve comment to the speech by Carlos Moedas, Commissioner for Research, Science and InnovaSon, Europe, 22 June 2015 Intro • Summarizing the main points of the speech PosiSoning • CriScal analysis of selected concepts as described by Moedas (decide together, which ones to choose) Outlook • What to expect from European commission's OS iniSaSve, how to react to it?
- 17. Assignment 3 deadline 18 Nov 8:00 pm Open Access, Open Educa(on and Disrup(ve Technologies 1. Finish your "paragraph" in the etherpad document h-ps:// pad.okfn.org/p/openscience_blog 2. Read Herb, U. (2010). Sociological implicaSons of scienSfic publishing: Open access, science, society, democracy, and the digital divide. First Monday, 15(2). 3. Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of interacSve Media in educaSon, 2012(3).Read the text and write 1 A4 page: Despite all evidence of how MOOCS might be overrated today, how could they actually improve educaSon? Which characterisScs shows an imaginary or real MOOC you would like to parScipate in? (1 A4 page min)