SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Performance Benchmark for Microsoft
Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1
PUBLISHED: DECEMBER 2016
Copyright
This document is provided "as-is". Information and views expressed in this document, including URL and other Internet website
references, may change without notice. You bear the risk of using it.
Some examples depicted herein are provided for illustration only and are fictitious. No real association or connection is
intended or should be inferred.
This document does not provide you with any legal rights to any intellectual property in any Microsoft product. You may copy
and use this document for your internal, reference purposes.
The videos and eBooks might be in English only. Also, if you click the links, you may be redirected to a U.S. website whose
content is in English.
© 2016 Microsoft. All rights reserved.
Microsoft, Active Directory, Excel, Hyper-V, Internet Explorer, Microsoft Dynamics, Microsoft Dynamics logo, MSDN, Outlook,
Notepad, SharePoint, Silverlight, Visual C++, Windows, Windows Azure, Windows Live, Windows PowerShell, Windows Server,
and Windows Vista are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies.
All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
Contents
Applies to .......................................................................................................................4
Overview.........................................................................................................................4
Objective.........................................................................................................................4
Results summary............................................................................................................4
Data load ........................................................................................................................5
Organization structure ..................................................................................................5
Customizations...............................................................................................................6
User data.........................................................................................................................6
Test environment configuration ...................................................................................8
Testing method..............................................................................................................8
Setup configuration .............................................................................................................................8
Tuning and optimizations ....................................................................................................................9
Test run details ....................................................................................................................................9
Conclusion ......................................................................................................................9
This performance paper provides a benchmark for performance of a Dynamics CRM organization
instance running Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1.
Applies to
 Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1 (Version 8.1)
Overview
Microsoft Dynamics CRM delivers intelligent customer engagement to the market, helping companies
create customer experiences that are personalized, proactive, and predictive. Dynamics CRM provides
data anywhere, across a wide array of devices, ranging from phones and tablets to PCs, and through a
number of popular client types, such as smartphone apps, tablet apps, and Microsoft Dynamics CRM for
Outlook. This paper highlights the scalability and performance that can be achieved in terms of
concurrent users and feature functionality with the release of Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1.
Objective
This white paper benchmarks the performance and demonstrates the scalability and performance of
Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1.
Results summary
Performance testing was conducted for an organization that was set up in a standard Dynamics CRM
Online environment. The client PCs used in the test infrastructure were standard Microsoft Azure virtual
machines. Testing was carried out to benchmark the performance of Dynamics CRM Online 2016
Update 1 serving 17,868 concurrent users, performing tasks with a think time of 10 minutes. In this
environment, Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1 demonstrated the following performance
characteristics.
Concurrent
Users
+
Total Record
Count
Web Requests per
Hour
Average Page
Response Time
Average Business
Transaction Time
Business
Transactions*
17K 656,549,587 594K 0.58 secs 0.91 secs 679,963
+
17,868 users, each performing a business transaction once every 10 minutes.
*A business transaction is a full user scenario, which is simulated by the various steps in a test case. This test case is not a measure of system
capacity or throughput, but reflects the total number of business transactions that completed successfully during the more than two-hour test
run.
These results reflect the scalability and performance achieved on a specific Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1
implementation running in a Dynamics CRM Online environment. Factors like specific customizations, solutions, and
features imported by enterprise organizations, and geographic distribution of users can affect how enterprise organizations
use the CRM system. Therefore, results will vary for each implementation.
Θ Important
This benchmark focuses on server-side performance and metrics. The response times reported here are for clients in a test
environment, running Azure Virtual Machines. As a result, response times here are in no way indicative of exact client
responsiveness that might be seen when rendering in a browser from a client located somewhere else.
Data load
User load was modeled to reproduce 15,040 concurrent users, in a model similar to an enterprise-class
deployment of a Microsoft Dynamics CRM organization. The actual load generated was 17,868 users.
The increase in the number of users occurred because some test cases executed on more than one
virtual machine for the same virtual user.
The target load was determined after reviewing the baseline from previous releases and the capacity
(memory, compute power) of the Dynamics CRM Online servers.
The organization database size was 1.024 TB.
Organization structure
To test the scale of a business unit (BU) defined security model, a complicated business unit hierarchy with 47
sectors (4 BUs per sector for a total of 188 BUs) was created. The depth of business units was set to four. To test
the performance of a CRM system in a realistic manner, each of the business units was assigned users of different
security roles. Nine security roles were selected for all users in the Dynamics CRM organization, of which eight
were security roles that come “out-of-the-box” with Microsoft Dynamics CRM; one role, named Sales Associate,
was a custom security role. The security roles were:
 System Administrator
 Sales Manager
 Marketing Manager
 Customer Service Representative Manager
 Scheduler
 Marketing Professional
 Salesperson
 Customer Service Representative
 Sales Associate
This diagram showcases the distribution of users and teams in each of the business units.
Customizations
To model a realistic enterprise, the organization was configured with four customizations.
Commonly-used entities like account, contact, lead, and task were modeled with custom attributes.
Field-level security was also enabled on custom attributes to reflect a realistic enterprise organization.
User data
Based on customer research, each user of a specific role was assigned a realistic set of data. The data
that the user would own was based on the user’s role. Before the test, the total data in the test database
included more than 656,549,587 business records with a total database size of 1.024 TB.
This table provides a summary of the record count, which shows the top 51 entity tables by row count
Table Name Row Count
ActivityPartyBase 184,652,344
PostRoleBase 83,441,322
ActivityPointerBase 59,481,420
PostBase 50,213,237
PostCommentBase 44,538,712
PostRegardingBase 26,455,649
AnnotationBase 25,710,513
TaskBase 24,108,341
LeadAddressBase 22,344,376
PrincipalObjectAccess 20,609,782
CustomerAddressBase 19,195,039
EmailSearchBase 18,896,180
ImageDescriptor 18,730,149
BusinessProcessFlowInstanceBase 15,536,906
LeadBase 11,172,188
IncidentBase 4,895,570
KnowledgeArticleBase 4,028,276
AccountBase 4,005,329
ContactBase 3,728,127
PostFollowBase 2,555,946
DocumentIndex 2,014,138
InvoiceBase 859,624
InvoiceDetailBase 859,540
SalesOrderDetailBase 856,622
SalesOrderBase 855,039
OpportunityBase 625,519
OpportunityProductBase 607,093
new_imBase 538,159
QuoteBase 532,208
PrincipalEntityMap 471,777
PrincipalAttributeAccessMap 447,886
QuoteDetailBase 402,299
ConnectionBase 393,280
ListMemberBase 365,361
SystemUserBusinessUnitEntityMap 258,718
ResourceGroupExpansionBase 188,446
ListBase 162,972
SystemUserPrincipals 157,415
MailboxBase 116,211
QueueMembership 93,409
UserEntityUISettingsBase 90,809
DependencyBase 87,522
QueueBase 84,208
RecurrenceRuleBase 82,180
CampaignBase 77,211
DependencyNodeBase 71,249
InternalAddressBase 68,144
CalendarBase 64,327
CalendarRuleBase 64,326
TeamMembership 61,406
Test environment configuration
Four test client PCs (virtual machines), hosted in Azure, were used to simulate concurrent user load.
Here is an overview of the environment configuration.
Testing method
Test scenarios were based on customer research and were created using the Microsoft Dynamics CRM
Performance and Stress Toolkit (Performance Toolkit), which is designed to formalize performance
testing of Microsoft Dynamics CRM by facilitating load testing of simulated customer environments.
Setup configuration
 A batch of 17,868 concurrent users performed create, update, and delete (CRUD) operations
within Dynamics CRM Online.
 A warm-up time of 30 minutes was needed to get each client to load all the users.
 Performance data was captured every five seconds.
 A think time of 10 minutes was used per user to simulate a real-world scenario. Therefore, virtual
users were running tests continuously with a lag time of 10 minutes between each test run.
 Every test run carried additional overhead of authenticating the virtual users before initiating the
test run. The authentication was cached for subsequent test runs.
 A single virtual user performed all the test cases sequentially before moving to the next test run,
repeating all the tests.
 Internet Explorer 11 was used to render the pages.
Tuning and optimizations
 Standard optimization techniques that are part of the Dynamics CRM Online optimization
process, such as adding recommended indexes, were included with the Dynamics CRM Online
organization used in this benchmark.
Test run details
Metric Value
Duration 2 hours
Max User Load 17,868
Tests/Sec 26.72
Average Test Time 2.47 seconds (test included several pages, web test plugin
executions, and an additional SQL Server connection to randomly
select records)
Average Page Time 0.58 seconds
Total Records 656,549,587
Web Requests/Sec 165
Conclusion
The results reflect the scalability and performance achieved in a standard Dynamics CRM Online
organization running Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1. Actual performance observed by customers
may vary based on factors like customizations, solutions, other features, geographic distribution of
users, and network latency.
These results demonstrate the robustness of Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1 and its capability to
handle concurrent user activities with ease for enterprise CRM scenarios.

More Related Content

PPTX
Q2 2018 (1805) Release Preview
PPTX
Power Apps - Data governance, compliance and security
PDF
20 reasons to upgrade to microsoft dynamics crm 2011
DOCX
Power BI Governance - Access Management, Recommendations and Best Practices
PPTX
February 16 webcast final 1
PPTX
Control Outlook Synchronization Settings for Dynamics CRM users
PPT
EA as a Change Management Agent
PPTX
Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011 Walkthrough Part 2
Q2 2018 (1805) Release Preview
Power Apps - Data governance, compliance and security
20 reasons to upgrade to microsoft dynamics crm 2011
Power BI Governance - Access Management, Recommendations and Best Practices
February 16 webcast final 1
Control Outlook Synchronization Settings for Dynamics CRM users
EA as a Change Management Agent
Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011 Walkthrough Part 2

What's hot (19)

PDF
MicroStrategy 10.2 New Features
DOCX
Share point server 2016 as a document management solution
PPT
Informatica Power Center - Workflow Manager
PPTX
Salesforce Spring 14 Release Developer Overview
PDF
Open Source Solution
DOCX
Ms flow basics, troubleshooting and operational errors
PPTX
Eyecademy's top 15 new features list for microstratevy version 10
PDF
Epicor ERP 10 - Connected ERP
PDF
Sql server 2012_licensing_reference_guide
PDF
File based loader FBL Oracle Fusion
PDF
ER/Studio XE7 Datasheet
PPT
MicroStrategy - Effective Business Dashboards
PDF
Microsoft dynamics crm 2011 planning guide
PDF
formscape_enterprise edition 3_5
PDF
Microsoft dynamics 365
PPTX
Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011 Walkthrough Part 1
DOCX
PDF
Microsoft365 Vs Atomic Data White Paper
PDF
Tca best practices2
MicroStrategy 10.2 New Features
Share point server 2016 as a document management solution
Informatica Power Center - Workflow Manager
Salesforce Spring 14 Release Developer Overview
Open Source Solution
Ms flow basics, troubleshooting and operational errors
Eyecademy's top 15 new features list for microstratevy version 10
Epicor ERP 10 - Connected ERP
Sql server 2012_licensing_reference_guide
File based loader FBL Oracle Fusion
ER/Studio XE7 Datasheet
MicroStrategy - Effective Business Dashboards
Microsoft dynamics crm 2011 planning guide
formscape_enterprise edition 3_5
Microsoft dynamics 365
Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011 Walkthrough Part 1
Microsoft365 Vs Atomic Data White Paper
Tca best practices2
Ad

Similar to Performance benchmark for CRM Online 2016 update 1 (20)

PPT
Microsoft Dynamics CRM Enterprise SummitMAXF-CRM.ppt
PPTX
Tuga IT 2016 Dynamics CRM with Office 365 and Azure
PPTX
Dynamics 365 introduction and functional
PPTX
Dynamic 365
PDF
Salim Adamon: Dynamics CRM overview & architecture
PDF
Microsoft CRM xRM4Legal 2014 Introduction and Demonstration 0917
PPTX
CRM 2011 launch
PDF
Dynamics 365 fall summit 2017 final uploaded
PDF
Microsoft CRM xRM4Legal February 2015 Introduction and Demonstration
PPTX
Dynamics 365 CRM Module Full Explanation
PPTX
Overview Dynamics CRM 2016
PPTX
Dynamics CRM 2016 slides 1-5-2018
PDF
Microsoft Dynamics CRM Technical Training for Dicker Data Resellers
PPTX
PPTX
Microsoft CRM Features – What’s New with Dynamics CRM 2016? | BDO Connections...
PPTX
Microsoft dynamics crm 2011 a day in the life
PPTX
01182016124317.pptx
PPTX
8 ways ms dynamic 365 empowers digital transformation
PDF
JibeCRM Customer Service
PDF
JibeCRM Care Everywhere
Microsoft Dynamics CRM Enterprise SummitMAXF-CRM.ppt
Tuga IT 2016 Dynamics CRM with Office 365 and Azure
Dynamics 365 introduction and functional
Dynamic 365
Salim Adamon: Dynamics CRM overview & architecture
Microsoft CRM xRM4Legal 2014 Introduction and Demonstration 0917
CRM 2011 launch
Dynamics 365 fall summit 2017 final uploaded
Microsoft CRM xRM4Legal February 2015 Introduction and Demonstration
Dynamics 365 CRM Module Full Explanation
Overview Dynamics CRM 2016
Dynamics CRM 2016 slides 1-5-2018
Microsoft Dynamics CRM Technical Training for Dicker Data Resellers
Microsoft CRM Features – What’s New with Dynamics CRM 2016? | BDO Connections...
Microsoft dynamics crm 2011 a day in the life
01182016124317.pptx
8 ways ms dynamic 365 empowers digital transformation
JibeCRM Customer Service
JibeCRM Care Everywhere
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PDF
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PDF
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PPTX
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
PDF
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
PDF
Updated Idioms and Phrasal Verbs in English subject
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PPTX
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PDF
Yogi Goddess Pres Conference Studio Updates
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
Updated Idioms and Phrasal Verbs in English subject
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
Yogi Goddess Pres Conference Studio Updates
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf

Performance benchmark for CRM Online 2016 update 1

  • 1. Performance Benchmark for Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1 PUBLISHED: DECEMBER 2016
  • 2. Copyright This document is provided "as-is". Information and views expressed in this document, including URL and other Internet website references, may change without notice. You bear the risk of using it. Some examples depicted herein are provided for illustration only and are fictitious. No real association or connection is intended or should be inferred. This document does not provide you with any legal rights to any intellectual property in any Microsoft product. You may copy and use this document for your internal, reference purposes. The videos and eBooks might be in English only. Also, if you click the links, you may be redirected to a U.S. website whose content is in English. © 2016 Microsoft. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Active Directory, Excel, Hyper-V, Internet Explorer, Microsoft Dynamics, Microsoft Dynamics logo, MSDN, Outlook, Notepad, SharePoint, Silverlight, Visual C++, Windows, Windows Azure, Windows Live, Windows PowerShell, Windows Server, and Windows Vista are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
  • 3. Contents Applies to .......................................................................................................................4 Overview.........................................................................................................................4 Objective.........................................................................................................................4 Results summary............................................................................................................4 Data load ........................................................................................................................5 Organization structure ..................................................................................................5 Customizations...............................................................................................................6 User data.........................................................................................................................6 Test environment configuration ...................................................................................8 Testing method..............................................................................................................8 Setup configuration .............................................................................................................................8 Tuning and optimizations ....................................................................................................................9 Test run details ....................................................................................................................................9 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................9
  • 4. This performance paper provides a benchmark for performance of a Dynamics CRM organization instance running Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1. Applies to  Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1 (Version 8.1) Overview Microsoft Dynamics CRM delivers intelligent customer engagement to the market, helping companies create customer experiences that are personalized, proactive, and predictive. Dynamics CRM provides data anywhere, across a wide array of devices, ranging from phones and tablets to PCs, and through a number of popular client types, such as smartphone apps, tablet apps, and Microsoft Dynamics CRM for Outlook. This paper highlights the scalability and performance that can be achieved in terms of concurrent users and feature functionality with the release of Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1. Objective This white paper benchmarks the performance and demonstrates the scalability and performance of Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1. Results summary Performance testing was conducted for an organization that was set up in a standard Dynamics CRM Online environment. The client PCs used in the test infrastructure were standard Microsoft Azure virtual machines. Testing was carried out to benchmark the performance of Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1 serving 17,868 concurrent users, performing tasks with a think time of 10 minutes. In this environment, Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1 demonstrated the following performance characteristics. Concurrent Users + Total Record Count Web Requests per Hour Average Page Response Time Average Business Transaction Time Business Transactions* 17K 656,549,587 594K 0.58 secs 0.91 secs 679,963 + 17,868 users, each performing a business transaction once every 10 minutes. *A business transaction is a full user scenario, which is simulated by the various steps in a test case. This test case is not a measure of system capacity or throughput, but reflects the total number of business transactions that completed successfully during the more than two-hour test run. These results reflect the scalability and performance achieved on a specific Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1 implementation running in a Dynamics CRM Online environment. Factors like specific customizations, solutions, and features imported by enterprise organizations, and geographic distribution of users can affect how enterprise organizations use the CRM system. Therefore, results will vary for each implementation. Θ Important
  • 5. This benchmark focuses on server-side performance and metrics. The response times reported here are for clients in a test environment, running Azure Virtual Machines. As a result, response times here are in no way indicative of exact client responsiveness that might be seen when rendering in a browser from a client located somewhere else. Data load User load was modeled to reproduce 15,040 concurrent users, in a model similar to an enterprise-class deployment of a Microsoft Dynamics CRM organization. The actual load generated was 17,868 users. The increase in the number of users occurred because some test cases executed on more than one virtual machine for the same virtual user. The target load was determined after reviewing the baseline from previous releases and the capacity (memory, compute power) of the Dynamics CRM Online servers. The organization database size was 1.024 TB. Organization structure To test the scale of a business unit (BU) defined security model, a complicated business unit hierarchy with 47 sectors (4 BUs per sector for a total of 188 BUs) was created. The depth of business units was set to four. To test the performance of a CRM system in a realistic manner, each of the business units was assigned users of different security roles. Nine security roles were selected for all users in the Dynamics CRM organization, of which eight were security roles that come “out-of-the-box” with Microsoft Dynamics CRM; one role, named Sales Associate, was a custom security role. The security roles were:  System Administrator  Sales Manager  Marketing Manager  Customer Service Representative Manager  Scheduler  Marketing Professional  Salesperson  Customer Service Representative  Sales Associate
  • 6. This diagram showcases the distribution of users and teams in each of the business units. Customizations To model a realistic enterprise, the organization was configured with four customizations. Commonly-used entities like account, contact, lead, and task were modeled with custom attributes. Field-level security was also enabled on custom attributes to reflect a realistic enterprise organization. User data Based on customer research, each user of a specific role was assigned a realistic set of data. The data that the user would own was based on the user’s role. Before the test, the total data in the test database included more than 656,549,587 business records with a total database size of 1.024 TB. This table provides a summary of the record count, which shows the top 51 entity tables by row count Table Name Row Count ActivityPartyBase 184,652,344 PostRoleBase 83,441,322 ActivityPointerBase 59,481,420 PostBase 50,213,237 PostCommentBase 44,538,712 PostRegardingBase 26,455,649 AnnotationBase 25,710,513
  • 7. TaskBase 24,108,341 LeadAddressBase 22,344,376 PrincipalObjectAccess 20,609,782 CustomerAddressBase 19,195,039 EmailSearchBase 18,896,180 ImageDescriptor 18,730,149 BusinessProcessFlowInstanceBase 15,536,906 LeadBase 11,172,188 IncidentBase 4,895,570 KnowledgeArticleBase 4,028,276 AccountBase 4,005,329 ContactBase 3,728,127 PostFollowBase 2,555,946 DocumentIndex 2,014,138 InvoiceBase 859,624 InvoiceDetailBase 859,540 SalesOrderDetailBase 856,622 SalesOrderBase 855,039 OpportunityBase 625,519 OpportunityProductBase 607,093 new_imBase 538,159 QuoteBase 532,208 PrincipalEntityMap 471,777 PrincipalAttributeAccessMap 447,886 QuoteDetailBase 402,299 ConnectionBase 393,280 ListMemberBase 365,361 SystemUserBusinessUnitEntityMap 258,718 ResourceGroupExpansionBase 188,446 ListBase 162,972 SystemUserPrincipals 157,415 MailboxBase 116,211 QueueMembership 93,409 UserEntityUISettingsBase 90,809 DependencyBase 87,522 QueueBase 84,208 RecurrenceRuleBase 82,180 CampaignBase 77,211
  • 8. DependencyNodeBase 71,249 InternalAddressBase 68,144 CalendarBase 64,327 CalendarRuleBase 64,326 TeamMembership 61,406 Test environment configuration Four test client PCs (virtual machines), hosted in Azure, were used to simulate concurrent user load. Here is an overview of the environment configuration. Testing method Test scenarios were based on customer research and were created using the Microsoft Dynamics CRM Performance and Stress Toolkit (Performance Toolkit), which is designed to formalize performance testing of Microsoft Dynamics CRM by facilitating load testing of simulated customer environments. Setup configuration  A batch of 17,868 concurrent users performed create, update, and delete (CRUD) operations within Dynamics CRM Online.  A warm-up time of 30 minutes was needed to get each client to load all the users.  Performance data was captured every five seconds.
  • 9.  A think time of 10 minutes was used per user to simulate a real-world scenario. Therefore, virtual users were running tests continuously with a lag time of 10 minutes between each test run.  Every test run carried additional overhead of authenticating the virtual users before initiating the test run. The authentication was cached for subsequent test runs.  A single virtual user performed all the test cases sequentially before moving to the next test run, repeating all the tests.  Internet Explorer 11 was used to render the pages. Tuning and optimizations  Standard optimization techniques that are part of the Dynamics CRM Online optimization process, such as adding recommended indexes, were included with the Dynamics CRM Online organization used in this benchmark. Test run details Metric Value Duration 2 hours Max User Load 17,868 Tests/Sec 26.72 Average Test Time 2.47 seconds (test included several pages, web test plugin executions, and an additional SQL Server connection to randomly select records) Average Page Time 0.58 seconds Total Records 656,549,587 Web Requests/Sec 165 Conclusion The results reflect the scalability and performance achieved in a standard Dynamics CRM Online organization running Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1. Actual performance observed by customers may vary based on factors like customizations, solutions, other features, geographic distribution of users, and network latency.
  • 10. These results demonstrate the robustness of Dynamics CRM Online 2016 Update 1 and its capability to handle concurrent user activities with ease for enterprise CRM scenarios.