SlideShare a Scribd company logo
3
Most read
6
Most read
17
Most read
Philo 1
   MIDTERM
   Stephanie F. Branzuela
      TF(7:30-9:00)AM

PROF. FRANKLIN Q. CLITAR
Judgment..
• The second act of the intellect by which it
  pronounces the agreement or disagreement
  between terms and ideas.

• It is the act by which the intellect compares
  and expresses the objective identity or non-
  identity between ideas. Ideas in themselves
  are neither true nor false.
• Example : The term “ lady ” and the term “
  beautiful ” are neither true nor false. But
  when the intellect compares these two
  terms and expresses whether they agree
  or disagree in a statement, then we can
  say whether the statement is true or false.
  Thus, the sentence “The lady is
  beautiful.” could now be said to be true or
  false. The intellect making judgment
  therefore either affirms or denies.
Proposition
• external sign of judgment w/c express
  declarative sentence.
• provides reason, explanation to support a
  judgment made expresses an idea, explanation
  feeling or emotion.
• can be analyzed as either true or false
• definition a statement which affirms or denies
  something about a reality or object.
Components of A Proposition
1. Subject term- being talk about the predicate.

   a) Quantifier- words w/c determines the quantity.

2. Copula- are expressed in the verb ‘to be’
         - determines the quality.

3. Predicate term- the one that describe the subject.
2 kinds of Proposition
• Affirmative Proposition-
  Expresses agreement between
  two terms

• Negative Proposition- Expresses
  disagreement between two
  terms
Quality of the Proposition
    The quality of proposition is determined by the quality
    of the copula

Affirmative
     whenever the predicate term accepts
    something of the subject term
             All roses are flowers.

Negative
     whenever the predicate term negates or
    denies something of the subject term
            A squash is not an eggplant.
A. Proposition in terms of
               Quality
              (Copula)
1. Affirmative proposition that uses
   affirmative Copula
2. Negative proposition that uses negative
   Copula
  B. Truth and Falsity (proposition in terms of
                      Reality)
1. True proposition- is the proposition that
   agree to the reality
2. False proposition- is a proposition that
   disagree the reality
C. Proposition in terms of Quantity (Quantifier)
1. Particular Proposition- is a proposition that uses
    particular subject term.
Ex. Some, several, few and etc.
• Several movie directors are passionate.
2. Universal Proposition- is a proposition that uses
    singular, indefinite, collective and universal w/c
    focuses on subject term.
Ex. This, that, all, every, each, any, group and no
    quantifier but it’s ends in ‘S’
• All government officials are natural-
    born citizens.
Combination of a Quantity
  and Quality of Proposition
1. Universal Affirmative Proposition- A”
   Proposition“
2. Particular Affirmative Proposition- “I”
   Proposition
3. Universal Negative Proposition- “E”
   Proposition
4. Particular Negative Proposition- “O”
   Proposition
Proposition Quantity      Quality


A          Universal or   Affirmative
           Singular
E          Universal or   Negative
           Singular
I          Particular     Affirmative


O          Particular     Negative
 All affirmative propositions share their
extensions to the subject terms and by doing so
the predicate gives some of its parts to the subject
 subject is drawn to the extension of the
predicate


 In Negative propositions the subject is
excluded from the extension of the predicate
 No relationship exists b/w the subject and the
predicate
Special types of Proposition
I.    Categorical Proposition
      a proposition whose Predicate is Directly attributed
       to the Subject.
      Answerable by true or false and yes or no directly.
      Predicate is always pointing our the subject directly.
      proposition by which the affirmation or denial b/w
       two concepts is expressed in an Absolute, Immediate,
       Direct or Unconditional manner
     Ex. Mangyans are the minorities from Mindoro.
Kinds of Categorical
A. Single Categorical Proposition- a
   proposition having 1S and 1P, whose P is
   directly attributed to the S.
Ex. Rema is pretty.
     2 types of Single Categorical Proposition
a) Simple Proposition- is a proposition w/a
    1S,1P and has NO MODIFICATION to the
    S,P and to the C.
Ex. She is simple.
b) Composite Proposition- is a proposition w/a
    1S,1P and has a MODIFICATIONS to the
    S,P,C and to the S and P.
Ex. The boy at the back is late.(S is modified)
     The boy is 15 mins. Late.(P is modified)
     The boy must be late.(C is modified)
2 types of Composite
a. Complex- Subject, Predicate, subject and
   predicate are modified.
b. Modal- Copula is modified.
Modal Proposition- is a proposition whose
   Copula is modified in order to show the
   MANNER or MODE how the Predicate
   belong to the Subject.
Kinds of Modal
1. Necessary Modal- a proposition
   whose copula is modified in order to
   show that the P MUST BELONG or
   (necessarily belong) to the S.
FORMULA: MUST BE
Ex. A circle must be round.
2. Impossible Modal- a proposition
   whose copula is modified in order to
   show that the P CANNOT/DOES NOT
   belong to the S.
FORMULA: CANNOT BE
Ex. A square cannot be round.
3. Possible Modal- a proposition whose copula
   is modified in order to show that the P CAN
   BELONG/MIGHT to the S.
FORMULA: CAN BE/MIGHT BE
Ex. I might be shopping tomorrow
4. Contingent Modal- is a proposition whose
   copula is modified in order to show that the
   P NEED NOT BELONG to the S.
FORMULA: NEED NOT BE/LONG
B. Multiple Categorical Proposition- a
   proposition w/c is a combination of two or
   more proposition uses
   1S,2P,2S,1P,2S,2P,2S,3P,3S,2P,3S,3P and etc.
Ex. Argene is handsome and smart.
o Argene is handsome.
o Argene is smart.
Kinds of multiple proposition
1. overtly multiple- plainly multiple(obviously)
2. covertly multiple- it appears to be single but actually
      multiple.

  • Copulative- is a proposition that has 2 or more
    SUBJECT/ PREDICATE combined into 1.
     It uses conjunction such as AND.
     E.g.
       mira and steph are dancer and singer.
     Mira is dancer.
     Mira is singer.
     Steph is dancer.
     Steph is singer.
• Adversative-combination of 2 proposition
  that are opposed to each other, with the
  conjunction; BUT, YET, ALTHOUG, EVEN
  THOUGH.
  E.g.
• We bathed the dog, but we couldn’t get him
  clean.
• You see yet do not hear.
• This technology, although not a foolproof way
  to monitor abusers, might give victims
  advance warning that danger is approaching.
• Even though she is ignorant but she is fine.
• Relative- 2 proposition that is combines,
  where the predicate have relation in terms of
  times and places; WHILE, AFTER, BEFORE.
e.g.
     Before you go, turn of the light.
     She is watching while eating.
     After the class, I play volleyball.
• Causal- combination of 2 proposition of it is
  cause/reason for the other. BECAUSE, FOR
   e.g.
      You got 5 because you didn’t take your
     examination test.
• Comparative- combination of 2 proposition
  expresses degree of comparison.
   • (GREATER, MORE THAN)
   E.g.

    Zerods is more smarter Than Earl.

More Related Content

PPT
Philo 1 inference
PPT
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of opposition
PPTX
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
PPTX
Kinds of Eductive Inference
PPTX
Nature of the idea
PPTX
PPTX
Judgment and proposition or logical statement
PPTX
Conversion (LOGIC)
Philo 1 inference
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of opposition
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
Kinds of Eductive Inference
Nature of the idea
Judgment and proposition or logical statement
Conversion (LOGIC)

What's hot (20)

PPT
Logic - Three mental operations
PPTX
Hypothetical proposition
DOCX
Propositions
PPTX
Reasoning (Logic)
PPTX
Fallacies
PPTX
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
PPTX
Hypothetical & Modal Propositions
PPTX
Mediate Inference/Syllogisms
PPTX
Square of opposition
PPTX
Fallacy and types
PPT
Categorical propositions
PPTX
LOGIC - Seminar In Problem Solving
PPTX
Hypothetical Syllogism
PPTX
INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC
PPTX
Square of opposition
PPT
Logical fallacies
PDF
Fallacies
PPTX
Methods of Philosophy
PPTX
Dilemma
PPTX
Logic - Three mental operations
Hypothetical proposition
Propositions
Reasoning (Logic)
Fallacies
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
Hypothetical & Modal Propositions
Mediate Inference/Syllogisms
Square of opposition
Fallacy and types
Categorical propositions
LOGIC - Seminar In Problem Solving
Hypothetical Syllogism
INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC
Square of opposition
Logical fallacies
Fallacies
Methods of Philosophy
Dilemma
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Logic Ppt
PPTX
Categorical Propositions- Logic
PPTX
Logic.ppt.
PPTX
LOGIC: Ideas & Terms
PPT
Logic hand outs#3
PPTX
Categorical propositions
PPTX
Logica silogismo parte 1 concepto y proposicion 11°
PPT
Categorical syllogism
PPT
The categorical-syllogism
PPTX
Chapter 1
PPTX
Categorical Propositions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 W Sound
PDF
Ensayo estudio comparado
PPTX
ppt presentatie Mindfulness 2015
PPT
Propositional logic
PPT
Philosophy lecture 03
PPT
Powerpoint present simple-affirmative
PPTX
Bringing the world into the classroom through educational
PPTX
Name that fallacy
PPT
Logic
Logic Ppt
Categorical Propositions- Logic
Logic.ppt.
LOGIC: Ideas & Terms
Logic hand outs#3
Categorical propositions
Logica silogismo parte 1 concepto y proposicion 11°
Categorical syllogism
The categorical-syllogism
Chapter 1
Categorical Propositions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 W Sound
Ensayo estudio comparado
ppt presentatie Mindfulness 2015
Propositional logic
Philosophy lecture 03
Powerpoint present simple-affirmative
Bringing the world into the classroom through educational
Name that fallacy
Logic
Ad

Similar to judgment(proposition) (20)

PPTX
PPTX
LOGIC in general mathematics123456789011
PDF
Midterm-Notes-Part-2.pdfujjiisisisjsjsisisosososkskkss
PPTX
JUDGMENT.pptx
PPT
Logic hand outs#4
PPTX
Judgment and Proposition-Explanation .pptx
PDF
Logic, fallacies, arguments and categorical statements.
PPTX
11_Proposition_and_Symbols.pptx
PDF
LIB440 Week 8 Induction Fallacies
PPTX
Sentences.pptx
PPTX
Revising Awkward and Confusing Sentences
PPTX
subject verb agreement
PPTX
Eduction (ph1)
PDF
Grammar in brief
PPT
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
PPTX
60 a intro to argument
PPTX
Cours d'anglais de Base MPCI L1S2 Power point.pptx
PPTX
8-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pptx
PDF
Syntax - Verb Group Vgrp
PPT
Verb-Tense-PowePoint ENGLISH SIX .ppt
LOGIC in general mathematics123456789011
Midterm-Notes-Part-2.pdfujjiisisisjsjsisisosososkskkss
JUDGMENT.pptx
Logic hand outs#4
Judgment and Proposition-Explanation .pptx
Logic, fallacies, arguments and categorical statements.
11_Proposition_and_Symbols.pptx
LIB440 Week 8 Induction Fallacies
Sentences.pptx
Revising Awkward and Confusing Sentences
subject verb agreement
Eduction (ph1)
Grammar in brief
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
60 a intro to argument
Cours d'anglais de Base MPCI L1S2 Power point.pptx
8-PARTS-OF-SPEECH.pptx
Syntax - Verb Group Vgrp
Verb-Tense-PowePoint ENGLISH SIX .ppt

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
7th-president-Ramon-Magsaysay-Presentation.pptx
PDF
4th-president-of-the-Philippines-_20250 812_103637_0000.pdf
PPTX
Elias Salame Uses Fake Trades to Make Real Money Disappear.pptx
PDF
Reviving Regional Truths: AI-Powered Journalism in Bangladesh
PDF
9th-President-of-the-Philippines_lecture .pdf
PPTX
India’s Response to the Rohingya Refugee Crisis: Balancing National Security,...
PPTX
Rhythms of Freedom_ India Day Shines at Battery Dance Festival 2025.
PDF
Best 5 Sites for Verified Cash App Accounts – BTC & Instant Delivery.pdf
DOCX
Memecoin memecoinist news site for trends and insights
PDF
424926802-1987-Constitution-as-Basis-of-Environmental-Laws.pdf
PPTX
The-Evolution-of-Public-Human-Resource-Management (1).pptx
PDF
Mindanao Debate Lecture Presentation Outline 1.General Facts 2.Mindanao Histo...
PPTX
Sir Creek Conflict: History and its importance
DOCX
Memecoin news and insights on memecoinist
PDF
Jim Stone Freelance Voterig August 13, 2025.pdf
PDF
Pancasila & Citizen Resume PPT - Guest lecture
PPTX
15 Years of Fraud The Shocking Case of CA Impersonation.pptx
PDF
How India’s First AI-Powered Anganwadi in Nagpur is Changing Education – As F...
PPTX
POLY[1]....pptxtheiowqt4h3ioth4iofhe2toh42i0fhe2io3
PDF
Opher Bryer-The Rise and Fall of Opher Bryer How an AI Startup Turned from Pr...
7th-president-Ramon-Magsaysay-Presentation.pptx
4th-president-of-the-Philippines-_20250 812_103637_0000.pdf
Elias Salame Uses Fake Trades to Make Real Money Disappear.pptx
Reviving Regional Truths: AI-Powered Journalism in Bangladesh
9th-President-of-the-Philippines_lecture .pdf
India’s Response to the Rohingya Refugee Crisis: Balancing National Security,...
Rhythms of Freedom_ India Day Shines at Battery Dance Festival 2025.
Best 5 Sites for Verified Cash App Accounts – BTC & Instant Delivery.pdf
Memecoin memecoinist news site for trends and insights
424926802-1987-Constitution-as-Basis-of-Environmental-Laws.pdf
The-Evolution-of-Public-Human-Resource-Management (1).pptx
Mindanao Debate Lecture Presentation Outline 1.General Facts 2.Mindanao Histo...
Sir Creek Conflict: History and its importance
Memecoin news and insights on memecoinist
Jim Stone Freelance Voterig August 13, 2025.pdf
Pancasila & Citizen Resume PPT - Guest lecture
15 Years of Fraud The Shocking Case of CA Impersonation.pptx
How India’s First AI-Powered Anganwadi in Nagpur is Changing Education – As F...
POLY[1]....pptxtheiowqt4h3ioth4iofhe2toh42i0fhe2io3
Opher Bryer-The Rise and Fall of Opher Bryer How an AI Startup Turned from Pr...

judgment(proposition)

  • 1. Philo 1 MIDTERM Stephanie F. Branzuela TF(7:30-9:00)AM PROF. FRANKLIN Q. CLITAR
  • 2. Judgment.. • The second act of the intellect by which it pronounces the agreement or disagreement between terms and ideas. • It is the act by which the intellect compares and expresses the objective identity or non- identity between ideas. Ideas in themselves are neither true nor false.
  • 3. • Example : The term “ lady ” and the term “ beautiful ” are neither true nor false. But when the intellect compares these two terms and expresses whether they agree or disagree in a statement, then we can say whether the statement is true or false. Thus, the sentence “The lady is beautiful.” could now be said to be true or false. The intellect making judgment therefore either affirms or denies.
  • 4. Proposition • external sign of judgment w/c express declarative sentence. • provides reason, explanation to support a judgment made expresses an idea, explanation feeling or emotion. • can be analyzed as either true or false • definition a statement which affirms or denies something about a reality or object.
  • 5. Components of A Proposition 1. Subject term- being talk about the predicate. a) Quantifier- words w/c determines the quantity. 2. Copula- are expressed in the verb ‘to be’ - determines the quality. 3. Predicate term- the one that describe the subject.
  • 6. 2 kinds of Proposition • Affirmative Proposition- Expresses agreement between two terms • Negative Proposition- Expresses disagreement between two terms
  • 7. Quality of the Proposition The quality of proposition is determined by the quality of the copula Affirmative  whenever the predicate term accepts something of the subject term All roses are flowers. Negative  whenever the predicate term negates or denies something of the subject term A squash is not an eggplant.
  • 8. A. Proposition in terms of Quality (Copula) 1. Affirmative proposition that uses affirmative Copula 2. Negative proposition that uses negative Copula B. Truth and Falsity (proposition in terms of Reality) 1. True proposition- is the proposition that agree to the reality 2. False proposition- is a proposition that disagree the reality
  • 9. C. Proposition in terms of Quantity (Quantifier) 1. Particular Proposition- is a proposition that uses particular subject term. Ex. Some, several, few and etc. • Several movie directors are passionate. 2. Universal Proposition- is a proposition that uses singular, indefinite, collective and universal w/c focuses on subject term. Ex. This, that, all, every, each, any, group and no quantifier but it’s ends in ‘S’ • All government officials are natural- born citizens.
  • 10. Combination of a Quantity and Quality of Proposition 1. Universal Affirmative Proposition- A” Proposition“ 2. Particular Affirmative Proposition- “I” Proposition 3. Universal Negative Proposition- “E” Proposition 4. Particular Negative Proposition- “O” Proposition
  • 11. Proposition Quantity Quality A Universal or Affirmative Singular E Universal or Negative Singular I Particular Affirmative O Particular Negative
  • 12.  All affirmative propositions share their extensions to the subject terms and by doing so the predicate gives some of its parts to the subject  subject is drawn to the extension of the predicate  In Negative propositions the subject is excluded from the extension of the predicate  No relationship exists b/w the subject and the predicate
  • 13. Special types of Proposition I. Categorical Proposition  a proposition whose Predicate is Directly attributed to the Subject.  Answerable by true or false and yes or no directly.  Predicate is always pointing our the subject directly.  proposition by which the affirmation or denial b/w two concepts is expressed in an Absolute, Immediate, Direct or Unconditional manner Ex. Mangyans are the minorities from Mindoro.
  • 14. Kinds of Categorical A. Single Categorical Proposition- a proposition having 1S and 1P, whose P is directly attributed to the S. Ex. Rema is pretty. 2 types of Single Categorical Proposition a) Simple Proposition- is a proposition w/a 1S,1P and has NO MODIFICATION to the S,P and to the C. Ex. She is simple. b) Composite Proposition- is a proposition w/a 1S,1P and has a MODIFICATIONS to the S,P,C and to the S and P. Ex. The boy at the back is late.(S is modified) The boy is 15 mins. Late.(P is modified) The boy must be late.(C is modified)
  • 15. 2 types of Composite a. Complex- Subject, Predicate, subject and predicate are modified. b. Modal- Copula is modified. Modal Proposition- is a proposition whose Copula is modified in order to show the MANNER or MODE how the Predicate belong to the Subject.
  • 16. Kinds of Modal 1. Necessary Modal- a proposition whose copula is modified in order to show that the P MUST BELONG or (necessarily belong) to the S. FORMULA: MUST BE Ex. A circle must be round. 2. Impossible Modal- a proposition whose copula is modified in order to show that the P CANNOT/DOES NOT belong to the S. FORMULA: CANNOT BE Ex. A square cannot be round.
  • 17. 3. Possible Modal- a proposition whose copula is modified in order to show that the P CAN BELONG/MIGHT to the S. FORMULA: CAN BE/MIGHT BE Ex. I might be shopping tomorrow 4. Contingent Modal- is a proposition whose copula is modified in order to show that the P NEED NOT BELONG to the S. FORMULA: NEED NOT BE/LONG
  • 18. B. Multiple Categorical Proposition- a proposition w/c is a combination of two or more proposition uses 1S,2P,2S,1P,2S,2P,2S,3P,3S,2P,3S,3P and etc. Ex. Argene is handsome and smart. o Argene is handsome. o Argene is smart.
  • 19. Kinds of multiple proposition 1. overtly multiple- plainly multiple(obviously) 2. covertly multiple- it appears to be single but actually multiple. • Copulative- is a proposition that has 2 or more SUBJECT/ PREDICATE combined into 1. It uses conjunction such as AND. E.g. mira and steph are dancer and singer. Mira is dancer. Mira is singer. Steph is dancer. Steph is singer.
  • 20. • Adversative-combination of 2 proposition that are opposed to each other, with the conjunction; BUT, YET, ALTHOUG, EVEN THOUGH. E.g. • We bathed the dog, but we couldn’t get him clean. • You see yet do not hear. • This technology, although not a foolproof way to monitor abusers, might give victims advance warning that danger is approaching. • Even though she is ignorant but she is fine.
  • 21. • Relative- 2 proposition that is combines, where the predicate have relation in terms of times and places; WHILE, AFTER, BEFORE. e.g. Before you go, turn of the light. She is watching while eating. After the class, I play volleyball.
  • 22. • Causal- combination of 2 proposition of it is cause/reason for the other. BECAUSE, FOR e.g. You got 5 because you didn’t take your examination test. • Comparative- combination of 2 proposition expresses degree of comparison. • (GREATER, MORE THAN) E.g. Zerods is more smarter Than Earl.