Polymers Used in Preparation of Nanofibers

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)
Volume 7 Issue 3, May-June 2023 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD56292 | Volume – 7 | Issue – 3 | May-June 2023 Page 117
Polymers Used in Preparation of Nanofibers
Tanmayi D. Kalamkar, Vikram Veer, Dipti S. Patil
Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, PDEA'S Shankarrao Ursal
College of Pharmaceutical sciences and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India
ABSTRACT
Polymer-based nanofibers as an important group of materials have
attracted considerable attention of research and industrial areas.
Polymer nanofibers with diameters in submicrometer (<1 µm)
possess unique properties including large specific surface area per
unit mass, which facilitated adding functionalities to surface for
specific application.
Typically, polymer nanofibers have been synthesized by
electrospinning, spinneret-based tunable engineered parameters
(STEP) or drawing techniques, template synthesis, phase
separation/inversion, self-assembly, solution blowing (air jet
spinning), forcespinning (centrifugal spinning), and interfacial
polymerization of nanofibers. The most common method is
electrospinning due to its feasibility, cost-effectiveness, ability to
fabricate continuous fibers from various polymers, and mass
production. Polymer nanofibers are fabricated from both natural and
synthetic polymers.
KEYWORDS: Polymer, Nanofibers, Preparation, Fabrication
How to cite this paper: Tanmayi D.
Kalamkar | Vikram Veer | Dipti S. Patil
"Polymers Used in Preparation of
Nanofibers"
Published in
International Journal
of Trend in
Scientific Research
and Development
(ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-
6470, Volume-7 |
Issue-3, June 2023, pp.117-132, URL:
www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd56292.pdf
Copyright © 2023 by author (s) and
International Journal of Trend in
Scientific Research and Development
Journal. This is an
Open Access article
distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Introduction of Nanofibers
Nanofibers are fibers with diameters in the
nanometer range (typically, between 1 nm and 1 µm).
Nanofibers can be generated from different Polymers
and hence have different physical properties and
application potentials. Examples of natural polymers
include collagen, cellulose, silk fibroin, keratin,
gelatin and polysaccharides such as chitosan and
alginate.[1][2] Examples of synthetic polymers
include poly(lactic acid) (PLA), polycaprolactone
(PCL),[3] polyurethane (PU), poly(lactic-co-glycolic
acid) (PLGA), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-
hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), and poly(ethylene-co-
vinylacetate) (PEVA).[1][2] Polymer chains are
connected via covalent bonds.[4] The diameters of
nanofibers depend on the type of polymer used and
the method of production.[5] All polymer nanofibers
are unique for their large surface area-to-volume
ratio, high porosity, appreciable mechanical strength,
and flexibility in functionalization compared to their
microfiber counterparts.[1][2][6] There exist many
different methods to make nanofibers, including
drawing, electrospinning, self-assembly, template
synthesis, and thermal-induced phase separation.
Electrospinning is the most commonly used method
to generate nanofibers because of the straightforward
setup, the ability to mass-produce continuous
nanofibers from various polymers, and the capability
to generate ultrathin fibers with controllable
diameters, compositions, and orientations.[6] This
flexibility allows for controlling the shape and
arrangement of the fibers so that different structures
(i.e. hollow, flat and ribbon shaped) can be fabricated
depending on intended application purposes. Using an
innovative melt processing method, which is
appropriate for the industrial mass production,
scientists and engineers at the University of
Minnesota, have been able to make nanofibers as thin
as only 36 nm.[7]
Nanofibers have many possible technological and
commercial applications. They are used in tissue
engineering,[1][2][8] drug delivery,[9][10][11] seed
coating material,[12][13][14] cancer
diagnosis,[15][16][17] lithium-air
battery,[18][19][20] optical sensors,[21][22][23] air
filtration,[24][25][26] redox-flow batteries [27] and
composite materials.[28]
IJTSRD56292

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Polymers used in Nanofibers Formation:
Natural Polymers:
1. Chitosan
Chitosan (CS) is a natural cationic polyelectrolyte
copolymer that can be obtained by the deacetylation
of its parent polymer chitin, a naturally occurring
source derived from the exoskeleton of insects,
crustaceans, and certain fungi. The abundance as a
renewable resource and excellent properties, such as
haemostasis, biodegradability, biocompatibility, non-
toxicity, and chelation with metals, render chitosan
suitable for biomedical applications. Moreover,
chitosan has also shown good performances in
inhibiting the growth of a wide variety of yeasts,
fungi, and bacteria as well as gas and aroma barrier
properties in dry condition. All these positive features
of chitosan have provided ample opportunities for
further development in biomedical and other
industrial fields. [29-31]
It has been reported that pure chitosan fibers can be
produced in nonaqueous solvents. For example,
electrospinning of pure chitosan was successfully
achieved in trifluoracetic acid (TFA) by Ohkawa et
al. [32] Sencadas et al. improved the homogeneity of
the nanofibers by adding dichloromethane to the
chitosan/ TFA mixtures and systematically studied
the processing parameters to set the ground for a
reproducible way to obtain chitosan nanofibers for
specific applications [33].
However, electrospinning individual chitosan from its
aqueous solution remains a challenge. First, the rigid
D-glucosamine repeat unit, high crystallinity, and
ability to form strong hydrogen bond of chitosan
make it difficult to be dissolved in most solvents. In
addition, its polycationic properly also leads to high
viscosity, which hinders the formation of sufficient
chain entanglements and results in the formation of
nanobeads rather than nanofibers [34]. However, the
solvents for the spinning of the pure chitosan are
environmentally harmful [35].The electrospinning for
chitosan can only be achieved at concentrations in the
range between 2% and 8% (wt/v). This urges us to
develop new versatile methods for the electrospinning
of chitosan at higher concentrations to ensure the
mechanical stability and retain the bioactivity of its
nanofiber products [36].
Therefore special attention needs to be paid to
improving the spinnability of chitosan. Attempts have
been made by blending chitosan with synthesized
polymers, such as polyethylene oxide (PEO),
polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and PLA, and renewable
polymers such as gelatin, alginate, and silk fibroin
and nanoparticles to improve the mechanical strength,
antibacterial activity, and antiadhesive properties
towards bacteria of its nanofibers [37].
PVA is a typical nontoxic and water-soluble
synthesized polymer with high biocompatibility and
hydrophilicity. More importantly, PVA has good
mechanical properties [38]. Liu et al. explored the
preparation of PVA/chitosan hydrogel nanofibers by
solution blowing method with ethylene glycol
diglycidyl ether (EGDE) as cross-linker at various
concentrations (as shown in Figure 8) and found that
CS/PVA hydrogel nanofiber mats possessed the
properties of both hydrogel and nanofiber mats. In
addition to the similar excellent exudate absorption
property to that of hydrogel films, hydrogel nanofiber
mats allowed gaseous exchange, which decreased
with the increase of its cross-linking degree (DCL).
Moreover, CS/PVA hydrogel nanofiber mats
demonstrated good antibacterial rates of over 81%
against E. coli, which was not significantly affected
by DCL. The findings suggest that the CS/PVA
nanofiber hydrogel is a promising material for wound
dressing [38].
Compared with synthetic polymers, natural polymers
have better biocompatibility and lower
immunogenicity. Sericin is one of the biodegradable
and biocompatible natural polymers with good
antioxidant, moisture absorption, and antibacterial
and UV resistance properties and has been widely
used in cosmetics and fabrics. Zhao et al. prepared
chitosan/sericin composite nanofibers by blending
binatural polymers and electrospinning to enhance
their biological performance. The nanofibers had
diameters ranging from 240 nm to 380 nm and
continuous and uniform diameter distribution.
Bioassays indicated that these novel composite
nanofibers showed noncytotoxicity and remarkably
enhanced cell proliferation and antibacterial activities
against both Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli
and Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus subtilis [39].
2. Cellulose
Cellulose is one of the most abundant biodegradable
materials and can be extracted from different natural
sources, such as wood and cotton pulps, via chemical
or physical methods [40].
Bacterial cellulose (BC) is natural cellulose
synthesized by acetobacter xylinum [40] and has high
biocompatibility and transparency, nontoxicity, and
excellent mechanical strength. Moreover, BC fibers
have a very high surface area per unit mass, which,
combining with its high hydrophilicity, leads to a
very high liquid loading capacity. Thus, BC has been
applied in various fields [41]. Costa et al. carried out
electrospinning of acetylated BC nanofiber mats to
produce artificial symmetric nanoporous structures.
The SEM images revealed that nanopores were more
uniformly distributed throughout the electrospun

nanofiber mat than those casted with BC mats. In
addition, the electrospinning of modified BC
nanofibers was easier than that of unmodified BC
nanofibers, which could be explained by the
dissolution mechanism of cellulose in DMA/LiCL
solvent system [42]
However, BC shows poor antibacterial, antioxidant,
and conducting and magnetic properties, which limits
its application in biomedical and electronic fields
[43]. One of the solution is to blend BC with other
substances to promote its properties. Carbon
nanotubules (CNTs) have been of great interest in
various fields since their discovery. They are
promising fillers for polymer matrices to prepare
CNTs-reinforced composite materials because of their
extraordinarily high aspect ratio, elastic modulus, and
high axial strength. Chen et al. prepared multiwalled
CNTs-embedded BC nanofibers (MWCNTs/BC
nanofibers) by electrospinning. The TGA analysis
showed that the initial temperature of degradation
followed the increasing order of BC < electrospun BC
nanofibers < electrospun MWCNTs/BC nanofibers,
which was attributed to the crystalline polymorph
transformation and orientation as well as the
embedded MWCNTs. In addition, the mechanical
properties including tensile strength and Young’s
modulus and electrical conductivity of the products
were significantly enhanced due to the well-dispersed
and aligned MWCNTs. The finding indicates that
MWCNTs/BC nanofibers may be potentially used in
medical, mechanical, and electrical fields.[44]
Cellulose Acetate (CA) is a derivative of cellulose
and has good stability and solubility in organic
solvent. It can also selectively absorb low-level
organic compounds and toxins. However, CA has
poor mechanical properties [45].
3. Alginate
Alginate is a natural linear polysaccharide copolymer
and can be obtained from brown sea weed. Sodium
alginate (SA) has been well studied on its biomedical
application due to its superior properties including
biocompatibility, biodegradability, nontoxicity,
hydrophilicity, and low cost. Unlike chitosan, alginate
is highly soluble in water [46].
To improve the structural integrity of the prepared
nanofibers, alginate-based materials are usually cross-
linked with divalent ions, such as calcium and
barium. In addition, double cross-linking with
glutaraldehyde, hexamethylene diisocyanate (HMDI),
epichlorohydrin, and adipic acid (ADA) hydrazide
has also been proposed. Unlike the non-cross-linked
electrospun nanofibers are highly soluble and
relatively insoluble in both water and simulated body
fluid [47-49].
However, pure SA nanofibers have been rarely
fabricated via electrospinning. Nie et al. [50] prepared
smooth and uniform alginate nanofibers by
introducing glycerol as cosolvent and simply
adjusting the volume ratio between glycerol and
water. Fang et al. [51] reported that pure alginate had
been successfully electrospun by introducing Ca2+
cations to SA aqueous solutions. They demonstrated
that high intermolecular interactions and low surface
tension were the critical factors to improve the
electrospinnability of SA solutions.
Alginate has poor properties including low
mechanical strength, high degradation rates, and
processing difficulties, which are usually overcome
by compositing alginate with other polymers such as
PEO [52] and PVA. It can be attributed to the
intermolecular hydrogen bonds formed between the
polymers and alginate. Surfactants, such as lecithin
[53], and cosolvents have also been proposed to
facilitate its processing for the preparation of
nanofibers [54].
4. Gelatin
Gelatin (GT) is a renewable polymer obtained by the
partial hydrolysis of collagen, a most abundant
natural substance in connective tissues. GT has been
widely used as a bioengineering material due to its
high biocompatibility, biodegradability, and low cost.
GT can also prevent fluid loss, which plays an
important role in wound healing [55-57]. However,
the electrospun gelatin nanofibers are soluble in water
and have poor mechanical strength [57,58].
Therefore, cross linking treatments have been adopted
to increase their water resistance and mechanical
properties [59,60]. The cross linking can be realized
by physical processes, such as drying, heating, γ-ray,
electron beam, and UV light exposure and chemical
treatments by using cross-linker, such as
formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde (GA), epoxy
compounds, tannic acid, carbodiimide, acyl azide, and
transglutaminase [61], through dissolving gelatin in
2,2,2-trifluoroethanol [62], formic acid dope solution
[63], and water-based cosolvent composed of ethyl
acetate and acetic acid [64]. Among all chemicals,
GA is by far the most widely used due to its high
efficiency, easy accessibility, and low cost. However,
glutaraldehyde at high concentrations is cytotoxic and
can disrupt the electrospun fiber morphology [65]. Ko
et al. [61] demonstrated that the gelatin nanofibers
cross linked with 0.5% (w/v) genipin promoted cell
proliferation and reduced its solubility and
cytotoxicity. Lu et al. [66] fabricated gelatin
nanofibers by electrospinning and compared the
properties of the gelatin nanofibers cross-linked by
vapour and liquid-phase GA. Their results indicated

that the cross-linking by both vapour-phase and
liquid-phase GA was able to improve the mechanical
strength of the gelatin fibers. The cross linking with
liquid phase GA resulted in more evenly cross-linked,
close packed, and higher tensile. The excessive cross-
linking with vapour-phase GA led to membranes
shrinking due to poorly cross-linked middle layers in
their hierarchy structure. Therefore, a novel in situ
cross-linking method was proposed by Slemming-
Adamsen et al. [67] for the fabrication of electrospun
gelatin nanofibers with 1-ethyl-3-(3-
dimethylaminopropyl)-1-carbodiimide hydrochloride
(EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) as cross-
linkers. Kwak et al. [68] prepared Phaeodactylum
tricornutum (P. tricornutum) extract-loaded gelatin
nanofibers via electrospinning. P. tricornutum is a
diatom which exists in brackish and marine water
worldwide. The water-soluble extracts of P.
tricornutum have showed anti-inflammatory,
analgesic, and free radical scavenging activities. The
introduction of P. tricornutum extracts improved the
conductivity of the gelatin solution and reduced the
diameter of the nanofibers. Their results also
confirmed the antimicrobial activity and
noncytotoxicity of the P. tricornutum-loaded gelatin
nanofibers.
Gelatin has also been used as a blend component to
prepare nanofibrous membranes for tissue scaffolds,
wound healing and health caring devices, and other
biomedical applications. Shan et al. [69] prepared silk
fibroin/gelatin (SF/GT) electrospun nanofibrous
dressing loaded with astragaloside IV (AS), an
effective component, to accelerate wound healing.
They found that the nanofibers were able to
significantly improve cell adhesion and proliferation,
promote wound healing, induce proangiogenesis of
partial thickness burn wound, and inhibit
complications in wounds. In addition, SF significantly
decreased the average diameter, degradation rate, and
the facture strain under high break strength of the
produced nanofibers.
In addition, to the general properties of a condensed
polyphenol, the grape seed polyphenol (GSP) has
some unique properties, such as antimicrobial
activity, anti-inflammatory activity, and reducing
blood sugar and fat. Han et al. [70] fabricated
GSP/gelatin composite nanofibers containing Ag-NPs
by electrospinning as a novel biomaterial. GSP served
as the reducing agent and stabilizing agent for silver
nanoparticles. The electrospun composite nanofibers
had average diameters in the range of 150-230nm and
a uniform distribution of Ag-NPs with an average
diameter of 11nm that contributed to their good
antibacterial performance. Further investigation also
revealed that the composite nanofibers containing
silver nanoparticles had no toxicity at such
concentrations. Thus, they could be potentially
utilized in biomedical field as a wound dressing.
5. Hyaluronic Acid
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is one main glycosaminoglycan
which is found in the ECM of many soft tissues of
higher animals [71]. HA can decrease the formation
of postsurgical adhesions due to its noncoagulant
activity, modulation of fibrous tissue, barrier effect on
fibrinogen, and inhibitory effect on the superoxide
release from granulocytes [72]. Previous studies have
demonstrated that HA nanofiber wound dressing
showed better performance than the solid HA in
wound healing due to its unique morphologies.
However, HA solutions have high solution viscosity
even at low concentrations, leading to issues in the
production of consistent nanofibers [73].
Brenner et al. prepared pure HA nanofibers by
electrospinning in a solvent system of aqueous
ammonium hydroxide (25% NH4OH) and DMF at pH
of 11 to eliminate the solvent induced degradation
effects on the biopolymer as reported in the previous
studies. Continuous, cylindrical, and randomly
oriented pure HA nanofibers with a diameter of 39
±12nm and good biocompatibility were successfully
electrospun [71].
Uppal et al. fabricated HA nanofibers by
electrospinning with deionized water as a solvent and
cocamidopropyl betaine as a surfactant. Based on the
report of histopathologist, the sterilized HA
nanofibers wound dressing showed better pathology
performance than other sterilized wound dressings
including solid HA, gauze with Vaseline dressing,
adhesive bandage, and antibiotic wound dressing. The
evaluation criteria included epithelial tissue gap,
epithelial tissue detachment from the dermis, the
presence of granulation tissue, and the assessment
from clinic photographs based on the color of the
wound and whether the wound was fully covered or
not by the epithelial tissue. In addition, it showed
higher air permeability than sterilized solid HA and
gauze with Vaseline dressing, which contributed to
the faster wound healing [73]. In all, the addition of
antibiotic components could lead to better
performance of HA nanofibers.
Chen et al. prepared dual functional core-sheath
structured nanofibers with HA as the inner core and
Ag-NPs-loaded PCL as external sheath by coaxial
electrospinning. This design was used to control the
slow release of HA from the core to mimic the
biological function of HA in synovial fluid containing
high concentration of HA. The sheath acted as a
barrier with antimicrobial activityto prevent infection

and alleviate adhesion. The results demonstrated that
the core-sheath structure met the need of preventing
peritendinous adhesion and postoperative infection
through the slowly released HA and rapid release of
Ag-NPs without exhibiting significant cytotoxicity
[72].
6. Collagen
Collagen is the principal structural element of the
native ECM in a three-dimensional network structure
composed of multifibrils in a nanofiber scale. Due to
a wealth of merits including biological origin,
nonimmunogenicity, and excellent biocompatibility
and biodegradability, collagen has been widely used
as biomaterials in pharmaceutical and medical fields
such as carriers for drug delivery, dressings for
wound healing, and tissue engineering scaffold.
Among all isoforms of collagen, the fibrillar structure
of type I collagen has long been known for its
important roles in cell attachment, proliferation, and
differentiation.[74,75].
The adaptations of electrospinning to produce tissue
engineering scaffolds composed of collagen
nanofibers have shown that the structural properties
of the electrospun collagen vary with the tissue of
origin, the isoform, and the concentration of the
collagen solution [76].
Collagen-composite fibrous mats have been
fabricated with PEO [77], PCL [78,79], polylactide-
polyglycolide (PLGA) [76], poly(L-lactide-co-ε-
caprolactone) (PLCL) [80] chitosan [74],
hydroxyapatite [81, 82], and poly(L-lactic acid)-co-
poly(ε-caprolactone) (P(LLA-CL)) [83]. Chen et al.
[84] prepared the composite nanofibrous membrane
(NFM) of type I collagen, chitosan, and PEO by
electrospinning, which was further cross-linked with
GA vapor. The cross-linking increased Young’s
modulus of the NFMs and decreased their ultimate
tensile strength, tensile strain, and water sorption
capability. The NFMs showed no cytotoxicity toward
the growth of 3T3 fibroblasts and demonstrated good
biocompatibility in vitro. In addition, the NFMs
showed wound dressing for skin regeneration. Choi et
al. [79] examined the feasibility of using
PCL/collagen based nanofibers as a scaffold system
for implantable engineered muscle organization.
Their results showed that, in contrast to the randomly
oriented nanofibers, unidirectionally oriented
nanofibers could induce muscle cell alignment and
myotube formation. The aligned composite nanofiber
scaffolds seeded with skeletal muscle cells may be
able to provide implantable functional muscle tissues.
Liu et al. [85] explored the incorporation of
neurotrophin (NT-3) and chondroitinase ABC
(ChABC) into the electrospun collagen nanofiber for
spinal cord injuries (SCI) treatment. The sustained
release of NT-3 and ChABC for at least 28 days was
achieved. Such biofunctional scaffolds may be found
useful in SCI treatment by providing topographical
and multiple biochemical cues to manipulate the
growth inhibitory environment and promote axonal
regeneration.
7. Silk fibroin
Silk fibroin (SF) is a main component of silk. It is a
type of fibrous protein with remarkable mechanical
properties produced in the form of fiber by silkworms
and spiders. SF is also a promising wound dressing
material due to its excellent mechanical properties, as
well as its biocompatibility, controllable
biodegradability, water-based processing,
morphologic flexibility, and easily accessible
chemical groups for functional modification. Despite
its advantages, the low availability of SF limits the
industrial scale production of its biomaterials.
Generally, the electrospun SF fibers with desirable
properties for bioengineering are prepared with SF at
very high concentrations in the range of 20-40%. In
addition, the highly crystalline β-sheet secondary
structures result in the insolubility of SF, which limits
its biomedical applications. Therefore, electrospun SF
nanofibers are usually chemically treated with
methanol[86], ethanol, propanol [87], and water
vapour [88] to increase their stability. Strategies have
been proposed to increase the viscoelasticity of SF
systems by blending them with other polymers, which
improves the mechanical properties while
maintaining the biocompatibility of the obtained
nanofibers [89-92].
Calamak et al. [93] fabricated silk fibroin nanofibers
containing UV-reduced Ag-NPs by electrospinning
method and post treated the product with methanol
and GA vapour. The post treatments promoted the
mechanical properties of the SF bionanotexiles. The
results indicate that the methanol treatment was more
effective in the crystallization transition of fibroin
from random coil to β-sheet. In addition, Ag-NPs
significantly decreased the diameter of the nanofibers
and contributed to their antibacterial activity against
Gram-positive bacteria S. aureus and Gram-negative
bacteria P. aeruginosa.
Polyethylenimine (PEI) is a polycationic
antimicrobial polymer with interesting ability to enter
cells or permeabilize cell membranes. Calamak et al.
[91] prepared silk fibroin based antibacterial
bionanotextiles and explored their application as
wound dressing materials. The addition of PEI to the
nanofibers decreased the average diameter of the
nanofibers and increased their hydrophobicity, cell

viability, and antimicrobial activity against both gram
positive and gram negative bacteria.
Shahverdi et al. [90] fabricated silk fibroin blended
with PLGA nanofibers via a dual source
electrospinning setup, through which the
electrospinning of SF and PLGA nanofibers could be
separately optimized and achieved. They found that
the concentrations of SF and PLGA predominantly
affected the formation of the bead structure in the
fibers. The addition of PLGA significantly improved
the mechanical properties of the nanofibers. The
incorporation of SF with PLGA displayed better cell
attachment, proliferation, and viability performance
than pure SF nanofibers and pure PLGA nanofibers.
Synthetic Polymers :
1. Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)
Poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA) is a non-carcinogenic
synthetic polymer produced from vinyl acetate by
hydrolysis, alcoholysis, or aminolysis It is used in a
diversity of biomedical applications due to its
biocompatibility, biodegradability, non-toxicity,
hydrophilicity, and low tendency for protein adhesion
[94]. It has been broadly utilized for tissue
regeneration and drug delivery applications. Besides
its excellent hydrophilic nature and fluid absorption
ability, it also demonstrates an outstanding capability
to be manipulated in the form of fibers, particles,
sponges, textiles, and films. It has been employed in
the formulation of polymer-based wound dressings to
treat chronic wounds and acute injuries. Due to its
attractive properties, PVA has been frequently
utilized in biopolymer-based dressings to improve the
mechanical performance of the dressing for wound
healing and skin regeneration. Due to the strong
affinity of PVA wound dressings for binding with
glucose, some researchers suggested that it could be
utilized to develop wound dressings to treat diabetic
wounds. However, plain PVA–based wound
dressings have an incomplete hydrophilic feature with
insufficient elasticity and rigid structure, which limit
its application alone as wound dressing scaffolds.
Furthermore, some PVA–based wound dressings
suffer from poor stability in water. Among the
numerous wound dressing materials reported, wound
dressings formulated from PVA combined with some
biopolymers and some other synthetic polymers
display attractive features, such as excellent
biocompatibility, biodegradability, sustained drug
release profiles, etc. [95].
Preparation of PVA Nanofibers : The basis material
is PVA, which has a molecular weight of 72,000
g/mol. The PVA was used in the form of a PVA
solution with concentrations of 8%, 10%, and 12%.
Eight percent PVA solution was made by adding 8
grams of PVA into 100 ml of distilled water. Eight
grams of PVA were mixed with 100 ml of distilled
water to get an eight percent PVA solution. Ten
grams of PVA were mixed with 100 ml of distilled
water to make a 10% PVA solution. Twelve grams of
PVA were mixed with 100 ml of distilled water to get
a 12 percent PVA solution. The mixture was then
agitated at 100°C until it was totally homogenous.
Because PVA is hydrophilic, it maydissolve in water,
adding aquadest to a PVA solution tries to dissolve it.
The resultant solution was then electrospinning at 17
kV and 20 kV, with a distance of 7 cm, 10 cm, and 15
cm between the needle tip of syringe and the collector
drum, and a flow rate of 5 ml/hour and the
electrospinning process time is 1 hour.
2. Polycaprolactone (PCL)
Polycaprolactone (PCL) is a synthetic polymer that
belongs to the class of aliphatic polyesterstogether
with polylactide (PLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), and
poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) [96]. PCL is a
biocompatible and biodegradable polymer that has
been investigated for wound healing and tissue
regeneration applications. It stimulates quicker wound
healing and decreases inflammatory infiltration [96].
Nonetheless, PCL biodegrades at a significantly
slower rate in comparison with PLGA, PGA, and
PLA. This slow biodegradation causes PCL to be less
attractive for this type of biomedical application but
more attractive for controlled-release, sutures, and
long-term implant applications. Therefore, the
combination of biopolymers with PVA or PCL to
prepare hybrid nanofibers via electrospinning
technique can result in interesting excellent properties
that would be very suitable for wound healing and
skin regeneration applications. The main limitation of
PCL is poor cell adhesion and growth resulting from
its hydrophobic surface. Therefore, it essential to
blend PCL with natural polymers to enhance its
cellular attachment and proliferation. The other
disadvantage of PCL is weak antimicrobial effects
that can be overcome by loading antibacterial agents
such as antibiotics and metallic nanoparticles [97].
Polycaprolactone (PCL), a biodegradable and bio-
compatible polymer with rheological and viscoelastic
propertiessuperior to many bioresorbable polymer
counterparts, has beenfabricated into a fibrous
structure with the electrospinningmethod and applied
for drug delivery, wound dressing, and tis-sue
regeneration.However, in order to obtain bead-
freenanoscale fibers, some highly toxic solvents such
as chloroform,dimethylformamide, tetrahydrofuran,
dichloromethane, andmixtures thereof have often
been used in the electrospinning of PCL. The toxic
effects of these volatile organic solvents bring
aboutdangers to the operator, environment, and end

users.Severalattempts have been made to find
alternative solvents to reducethe risk. Electrospinning
of PCL dissolved in acetone,aceticacid/acetone,and
formic/acetic acidyielded promisingresults of
nanoscale fibers. Yet, when PCL is dissolved in
glacialacetic acid (GAC), a much more benign
solvent,only beadednanofibers or microscale fibers
could be obtained unless a vol-atile toxic additive
(pyridine) is used.On the other hand,some
nonsolvents for PCL like
methanol,ethanol,ordimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)being
mixed with good solventsto improve the
processability of electrospinning have also
beenreported. However, H2O with no toxic properties
as a nonsol-vent for PCL has seldom been reported as
an assistant to elec-trospinning of PCL. Nevertheless,
previous reports showed thata PCL/chitosan
homogeneous solution could be achieved byblending
the PCL solution dissolved in GAC with a
chitosansolution dissolved in 0.5 Macetic acid when
the acetic acid con-centration is over. Thus it was
supposed that PCL anda high concentration of acetic
acid could form a homogeneoussolution. Compared
to the PCL/GAC solution, the conductivityshould be
increased after H2O is added for the ionization of
theacetic acid, which is beneficial for electrospinning
of nanofibers.
3. Polylactic Acid (PLA)
Poly (lactic acid) (PLA), poly (vinyl alcohol) and
polycaprolactone are examples of biocompatible
polymers. Due to its biodegradability,
biocompatibility and spinnability, PLA is a widely
used polymer in electrospinning processes in versatile
biomedical areas[98-99] PLA can be easily dissolved
in different kinds of conventional solvents such as
acetone (AC), chloroform (CHL), dichloromethane
(DCM), dimethylacetamide (DMAc),
dimethylformamide (DMF), 1;4-dioxane (DX),
tetrahydrofuran (THF). PLA can be produced by
condensation polymerization and ring opening
polymerization techniques. PLA obtained by
condensation polymerization has low molecular
weight and poor mechanical properties. Physical
properties of PLA have shown excellent improvement
with ring opening polymerization .Poly- L-lactic acid
(PLLA) occurs with polymerization of L-lactide. Poly
(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) is one of the most
commonly used copolymers of PLA in biomedical
applications. PLGA occurs by copolymerization of
PLA and polyglycolic acid (PGA). Nanofibers of
PLA and PLA blends can be used in a wide variety of
biomedical and biotechnological applications.
Biomedical applications include drug release, scaffold
for tissue engineering, dressings for wound healing
and dental applications while biotechnological
applications contain biosensors, molecular filtrations
and preservations of biological agents.
4. Polyurethane (PU)
PUs contains urethane group (–NH–(C=O)–O–) in
common while most PUs are thermosetting polymers,
in contrast to thermosetting polymers, thermoplastic
polyurethanes (TPUs) melt when they are heated and
are easy to use in manufacturing processes. Varying
the structure of PUs, their properties can be varied in
a wide range [100]. PUs are formed by reaction of
polyisocyanates with hydroxyl-containing
compounds. Desired properties can be tailored by
selecting the type of isocyanate and polyols, or
combination of isocyanates and combination of
polyols [100]. Strong intermolecular bonds make
polyurethanes useful for diverse applications in
adhesives and coatings, also in elastomers, foams, and
medical applications because of their good
biocompatibility. The factors determining properties
of a polyurethane elastomer are: structure of the
polyol, type of diisocyanate, type of the chain
extender, molar ratio NCO/OH, soft-segment
concentration, molecular weight of the polyol and
filler. In polyurethane elastomers, chains are linear,
and cross-linking was achieved by physical bonds and
hard domain formation. They flow when they are
melted and harden by cooling (thermoplastic
behavior). Displaying reversible cross-linking,
domains are destroyed above the melting point of the
hard phase, but are reformed when they get cooled.
These materials are called “thermoplastic urethanes”
(TPUs) [100]. In addition to the linear TPUs, obtained
from difunctional monomers, branched or cross-
linked thermoset polymers are made with higher
functional monomers. Linear polymers have good
impact strength, good physical properties, and
excellent processibility, but limited thermal stability.
On the other hand, thermoset polymers have higher
thermal stability, but sometimes lower impact
strength [101]. The vast selection of polyols,
isocyanates, and chain extenders allows PUs to be
varied from soft thermoplastic elastomers to
adhesives, coatings, flexible foams, and rigid
thermosets. TPU elastomers are segmented block
copolymers, comprising of hard- and soft-segment
blocks. The soft-segment blocks are formed from
long-chain polyester or polyether polyols and 4,4′,-
methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) (MDI); the hard
segments are formed from short-chain diols, mainly
1,4-butanediol and MDI [101]. The unique properties
of linear TPUs are attributed to their long-chain
structure. TPUs are resilient elastomers of significant
industrial importance, which possess a range of
desirable properties such as elastomeric, resistant to
abrasion, and excellent hydrolytic stability. PU is

often chosen as a material for composing a nanoweb
due to its chemical stability, mass transport, good
mechanical properties, and also excellent nanofiber
forming characteristic. Electrospun PU nanofiber
mats exhibiting good mechanical properties may have
a wide variety of potential applications in high-
performance air filters, protective textiles, wound
dressing materials, sensors, in biomedical
applications, drug delivery, etc.. It is also frequently
used in wound dressing studies because of its good
barrier properties and oxygen permeability. It has
reported that semipermeable dressings, many of
which are PU, enhance wound healing. Degradable
and biocompatible aliphatic PU could also be formed
into scaffolds via melt electrospinning. Beside these
biomedical applications, the PU nanofiber filters were
prepared by electrospinning process based on 3D
particle filtration modeling and some theoretical
predictions were obtained for the filtration efficiency
[102]. In another study, PU cationomers (PUCs)
containing different amounts of quaternary
ammonium groups were synthesized and electrospun
into non-woven nanofiber mats for use in
antimicrobial nanofilter applications [103]. Varying
the structure of PUs, the properties of PUs can vary in
a wide range. The flexibility to tailor the structure
during processing is one of the main advantages of
PUs over other types of polymers. A lot of different
types of PU used in electrospinning process, some of
them were synthesized before electrospinning
according to the researchers intended use and some of
them were used as they received.
5. Poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)
PLGA is produced by the catalyzed ring-opening
copolymerization of the LA and GA units. During
polymerization the monomeric units are
consecutively linked together through ester linkages,
resulting in the formation of the PLGA copolymer [3,.
PLGA is widely used in nanomedicine due to its
biocompatibility and effective biodegradability,
which occurs through the hydrolysis of the ester
bonds of lactate and glycolate. These monomers can
then be metabolized via the Krebs cycle, yielding
nontoxic byproducts (H2O and CO2) [104,105].
Different forms of PLGA can be obtained by varying
the Poly(lactic acid):Poly(glycolic acid) (PLA:PGA)
ratio during polymerization; for example, PLGA
50:50, which is frequently used in nanotechnology,
has a composition of 50% lactate and 50% glycolate.
PLGA copolymers inherit the intrinsic properties of
their constituent monomers, where the PLA:PGA
ratio, along with the polymer molecular weight,
influence their hydrophobicity, crystallinity,
mechanical properties, size and biodegradation rate.
PGA is a crystalline hydrophilic polymer, while PLA
is a stiff and more hydrophobic polymer; therefore,
PLGA copolymers with a higher PLA content are less
hydrophilic, tend to absorb less water and
consequently present longer degradation times [106].
The degradation time can vary from several months to
several years depending on the molecular weight
(Mw) and copolymer ratio. PLGA is soluble in a
variety of solvents, including organic solvents such as
chloroform, acetone, ethyl acetate and
tetrahydrofuran. All the above-mentioned features of
PLGA have been proven to be useful for several
applications; controlled drug release in particular.
PLGA can be block-polymerized with other
copolymers, which can alter its behavior and
physicochemical propert. Diblock or triblock
copolymers have been developed to meet the need for
better carrier functionality, both in terms of the
variety of drugs incorporated and administration
methods. Block copolymers of PEG (poly(ethylene
glycol)) and PLGA are the most reported both in
diblock (PLGA-PEG) [and triblock conformations
(PLGA-PEG-PLGA or PEG-PLGA-PEG). The
creation of PEG layers can reduce interactions with
foreign molecules, increasing shelf stability in this
way. However, it can also decrease drug
encapsulation efficiencies. When compared with
PLGA alone diblock copolymers have shown
improved release kinetics. The random combination
of other polymers with PLGA can also be beneficial;
for example, combining biodegradable
photoluminescent polyester (BPLP) with PLGA will
make the system suitable for photoluminescence
imaging [107]. Thus, it is important to consider the
final purpose of a system when choosing a polymer
conformation. Regarding the physical characteristics
of nano-PLGA structures, they can be controlled by
parameters specific to the production method
employed. For example, the size of PLGA NPs can be
determined to a certain extent by the concentration of
polymer used for their synthesis. Surface
functionalization is another important aspect that
allows a certain control over particles’
biocompatibility, biodegradation, blood half-life and,
when applicable, targeting efficiency. In fact,
PEGylation has been shown to improve the
pharmacokinetic properties of drugs encapsulated into
PLGA composites [108]; coating PLGA NPs with
biocompatible hydrophilic polymers (PEG or
chitosan) can enhance stability and circulation time
while diminishing toxicity. In terms of biomedical
applications, PLGA has been used in the clinic since
1989, being introduced mostly as microsphere
formulations; however, PLGA implants and
nanocomposites are also a reality. PLGA is mostly
utilized for drug delivery, having ~20 formulations

that are FDA- and EMA-approved [109]. These are
mainly administered by subcutaneous/intramuscular
injections.
6. Polyvinylpyrrolidone
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is widely employed as a
multifunctional material and it was approved by the
US Food and Drug Administration as a safe polymer
for biological experiments due to its simple
processability, biocompatibility, and non-antigenicity
[110-111]. PVP was largely employed as a
reinforcing material for biocomposites in a variety of
applications, including bone tissue engineering, soft
implants, biosensors, and artificial cartilage
substitutes. PVP can also be used in the fabrication of
PVA hydrogels-based composite scaffolds for bone
tissue engineering. PVP has several advantages in the
pharmaceutical fields, and it acted as a stabilizer, a
protective agent, a binder, a lubricating, a
crystallization inhibitor, and a bioavailability
enhancer for several active pharmaceutical
ingredients (API). It is widely known that PVP
exhibited a higher solubility in water and polar
solvents, and it also has a higher glass transition
temperature (165 ± 1°C ) and was chemically stable
in dry conditions [112]. Such physicochemical
properties of PVP make it a versatile polymer with
effective abilities in pharmaceutical field. PVP was
largely used to develop various drug delivery
systems, including oral, topical, transdermal, and
ophthalmic administration. PVP-based fibers
composed of several active substances were
successfully achieved [113]. PVP hydrogels, oral
tablets, PVP films, composite nanoparticles,
microcapsules, and microspheres [114] were also
developed
Conclusion:
The nanofibers prepared from the renewable
polymers and synthetic polymers can combine the
excellent properties of the renewable polymers and
nanofibers. They have become one of the most
important materials used in wound dressing and
attracted more and more attentions in recent years.
The preparation methods, including electrospinning,
bubbfil spinning, centrifugal spinning, and freeze-
drying, have been widely used to prepare the
nanofibers from the renewable polymers. Particularly
the wound dressings prepared from chitosan,
cellulose, alginate, gelatin, hyaluronic acid, collagen,
and silk fibroin or their composites have been widely
used as the wound dressing to promote wound
healing, hemostasis, skin regeneration, diabetic
ulcers, tissue engineering, and so on. Many of the
dressings have been used in clinic. But for many
renewable polymers which originated from natural
components, there are many factors which influence
the structure and property of the polymers and they
are hard to be controlled. Although their properties
are versatile, many of the properties are less
prominent. When the renewable polymers are
prepared to nanofibers and used for wound dressing,
many of their properties, including antibacterial
properties, hemostatic properties, biodegradability,
cell adhesion and proliferation, and mechanical
properties, need to be regulated by controlling the
structure and properties of the nanofibers or
compositing with other synthetic polymers to fit for
the requirement of different wound. The above
problems have become the future research keynotes
for the nanofibers prepared from the renewable
polymers.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors would like to acknowledge PDEA`s
Shankarrao Ursal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences
and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India for
offering all vital help to accomplish this work
efficaciously.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
All authors declared no conflict of interest for the
work.
References
[1] Vasita R, Katti DS (2006). "Nanofibers and
their applications in tissue engineering".
International Journal of Nanomedicine. 1 (1):
15–30. doi:10.2147/nano.2006.1.1.15. PMC
2426767. PMID 17722259.
[2] Khajavi R, Abbasipour M, Bahador A (2016).
"Electrospun biodegradable nanofibers
scaffolds for bone tissue engineering". J Appl
Polym Sci. 133 (3): n/a.
doi:10.1002/app.42883.3
[3] Sivan, Manikandan; Madheswaran,
Divyabharathi; Valtera, Jan; Kostakova, Eva
Kuzelova; Lukas, David (2022-01-01).
"Alternating current electrospinning: The
impacts of various high-voltage signal shapes
and frequencies on the spinnability and
productivity of polycaprolactone nanofibers".
Materials & Design. 213: 110308.
doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110308. ISSN0264-
1275. S2CID 245075252.
[4] Teraoka I (2002). Polymer Solutions: An
Introduction to Physical Properties. John Wiley
& Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-22451-8.
[5] Reneker D, Chun I (1996). "Nanometre
diameter fibres of polymer produced by
electrospinning". Nanotechnology. 7 (3): 216–

223. Bibcode:1996Nanot...7..216R.
doi:10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/009. S2CID
4498522.
[6] Li D, Xia Y (2004). "Electrospinning of
nanofibers: reinventing the wheel?". Adv
Mater. 16 (14): 1151-1170. Bibcode:
2004AdM....16.1151L.
doi:10.1002/adma.200400719. S2CID
137659394.
[7] Soltani I, Macosko CW (2018-06-06).
"Influence of rheology and surface properties
on morphology of nanofibers derived from
islands-in-the-sea meltblown nonwovens".
Polymer. 145: 21–30.
doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2018.04.051. ISSN0032-
3861. S2CID 139262140.
[8] Ma PX, Zhang R (July 1999). "Synthetic nano-
scale fibrous extracellular matrix". Journal of
Biomedical Materials Research. 46 (1): 60–72.
doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-
4636(199907)46:1<60::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-
h.hdl:2027.42/34415. PMID 10357136.
[9] Sharifi F, Sooriyarachchi AC, Altural H,
Montazami R, Rylander MN, Hashemi N
(2016). "Fiber based approaches as medicine
delivery systems". ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2
(9): 1411–1431.
doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00281. PMID
33440580.
[10] Ahn SY, Mun CH, Lee SH (2015).
"Microfluidic spinning of fibrous alginate
carrier having highly enhanced drug loading
capability and delayed release profile". RSC
Adv. 5 (20): 15172–15181.
Bibcode:2015RSCAd...515172A.
doi:10.1039/C4RA11438H.
[11] Garg T, Rath G, Goyal AK (April 2015).
"Biomaterials-based nanofiber scaffold:
targeted and controlled carrier for cell and drug
delivery". Journal of Drug Targeting. 23 (3):
202–21. doi:10.3109/1061186X.2014.992899.
PMID 25539071. S2CID 8398004.
[12] Farias BV, Pirzada T, Mathew R, Sit TL,
Opperman C, Khan SA (2019-12-16).
"Electrospun Polymer Nanofibers as Seed
Coatings for Crop Protection". ACS
Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 7 (24):
19848–19856.
doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05200. S2CID
209709462.
[13] Xu T, Ma C, Aytac Z, Hu X, Ng KW, White
JC, Demokritou P (2020-06-29). "Enhancing
Agrichemical Delivery and Seedling
Development with Biodegradable, Tunable,
Biopolymer-Based Nanofiber Seed Coatings".
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 8
(25): 9537–9548.
doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c02696. S2CID
219914870.
[14] De Gregorio PR, Michavila G, Ricciardi Muller
L, de Souza Borges C, Pomares MF, Saccol de
Sá EL, et al. (2017-05-04). "Beneficial
rhizobacteria immobilized in nanofibers for
potential application as soybean seed
bioinoculants". PLOS ONE. 12 (5): e0176930.
Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1276930D.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176930.
PMC5417607. PMID 28472087.
[15] Chen JF, Zhu Y, Lu YT, Hodara E, Hou S,
Agopian VG, et al. (2016). "Clinical
Applications of NanoVelcro Rare-Cell Assays
for Detection and Characterization of
Circulating Tumor Cells". Theranostics. 6 (9):
1425–39. doi:10.7150/thno.15359.
PMC4924510. PMID 27375790.
[16] Ke Z, Lin M, Chen JF, Choi JS, Zhang Y, Fong
A, et al. (January 2015). "Programming
thermoresponsiveness of NanoVelcro substrates
enables effective purification of circulating
tumor cells in lung cancer patients". ACS Nano.
9 (1): 62–70. doi:10.1021/nn5056282.
PMC4310634. PMID 25495128.
[17] Cristofanilli M, Hayes DF, Budd GT, Ellis MJ,
Stopeck A, Reuben JM, et al. (March 2005).
"Circulating tumor cells: a novel prognostic
factor for newly diagnosed metastatic breast
cancer". Journal of Clinical Oncology. 23 (7):
1420–30. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.08.140.
PMID15735118.
[18] Zhang B, Kang F, Tarascon JM, Kim JK
(2016). "Recent advances in electrospun carbon
nanofibers and their application in
electrochemical energy storage". Prog Mater
Sci. 76: 319–380.
doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.08.002.
[19] "Lithium-air batteries: their time has come".
The Economist. Aug 6, 2016.
[20] Yang X, He P, Xia Y (2009). "Preparation of
mesocellular carbon foam and its application
for lithium/oxygen battery". Electrochem
Commun. 11 (6): 1127–1130.
doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2009.03.029.
[21] Wang X, Drew C, Lee SH, Senecal KJ, Kumar
J, Samuelson LA (2002). "Electrospun

nanofibrous membranes for highly sensitive
optical sensors". Nano Lett. 2 (11): 1273–1275.
Bibcode:2002NanoL...2.1273W. CiteSeerX
10.1.1.459.8052. doi:10.1021/nl020216u.
[22] Yang Q, Jiang X, Gu F, Ma Z, Zhang J, Tong L
(2008). "Polymer micro or nanofibers for
optical device applications". J Appl Polym Sci.
110 (2): 1080–1084. doi:10.1002/app.28716.
[23] Zubia J, Arrue J (2001). "Plastic optical fibers:
an introduction to their technological processes
and applications". Optical Fiber Technology. 7
(2): 101–140. Bibcode:2001OptFT...7..101Z.
doi:10.1006/ofte.2000.0355.
[24] Kelly TL, Gao T, Sailor MJ (April 2011).
"Carbon and carbon/silicon composites
templated in rugate filters for the adsorption
and detection of organic vapors". Advanced
Materials. 23 (15): 1776–81.
doi:10.1002/adma.201190052. PMID
21374740.
[25] Scholten E, Bromberg L, Rutledge GC, Hatton
TA (October 2011). "Electrospun polyurethane
fibers for absorption of volatile organic
compounds from air". ACS Applied Materials
& Interfaces. 3 (10): 3902–9.
doi:10.1021/am200748y. hdl:1721.1/81271.
PMID 21888418.
[26] Graham K, Ouyang M, Raether T, Grafe T,
McDonald B, Knauf P (2002). "Polymeric
nanofibers in air filtration applications".
Fifteenth Annual Technical Conference & Expo
of the American Filtration & Separations
Society.
[27] "A bibliometric review of flow batteries'
progress and challenges". Journal of
Electrochemical Science and Engineering.
2022.
[28] Maccaferri, Emanuele; Mazzocchetti, Laura;
Benelli, Tiziana; Brugo, Tommaso Maria;
Zucchelli, Andrea; Giorgini, Loris (2022-01-
12). "Self-Assembled NBR/Nomex Nanofibers
as Lightweight Rubbery Nonwovens for
Hindering Delamination in Epoxy CFRPs".
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 14 (1):
1885–1899. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c17643. ISSN
1944-8244. PMC 8763375. PMID 34939406.
[29] M. Pakravan, M.-C. Heuzey, and A. Ajji, “A
fundamental study of chitosan/PEO
electrospinning,” Polymer, vol. 52, no. 21, pp.
4813–4824, 2011. View at: Publisher Site |
Google Scholar
[30] Sionkowska, “Current research on the blends of
natural and synthetic polymers as new
biomaterials: review,” Progress in Polymer
Science, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1254–1276, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
[31] M. Dash, F. Chiellini, R. M. Ottenbrite, and E.
Chiellini, “Chitosan-a versatile semi-synthetic
polymer in biomedical applications,” Progress
in Polymer Science, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 981–
1014, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google
Scholar
[32] K. Ohkawa, K.-I. Minato, G. Kumagai, S.
Hayashi, and H. Yamamoto, “Chitosan
nanofiber,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 7, no. 11,
pp. 3291–3294, 2006. View at: Publisher Site |
Google Scholar
[33] V. Sencadas, D. M. Correia, A. Areias et al.,
“Determination of the parameters affecting
electrospun chitosan fiber size distribution and
morphology,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 87,
no. 2, pp. 1295–1301, 2012. View at: Publisher
Site | Google Scholar
[34] M. Z. Elsabee, H. F. Naguib, and R. E. Morsi,
“Chitosan based nanofibers, review,” Materials
Science and Engineering C, vol. 32, no. 7, pp.
Google Scholar
[35] P. Su, C. J. Wang, X. Y. Yang et al.,
“Electrospinning of chitosan nanofibers: the
favorable effect of metal ions,” Carbohydrate
Polymers, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 239–246, 2011.
[36] A. Nada, R. James, N. B. Shelke et al., “A
smart methodology to fabricate electrospun
chitosan nanofiber matrices for regenerative
engineering applications,” Polymers for
Advanced Technologies, vol. 25, no. 5, pp.
Google Scholar
[37] R. Zhao, X. Li, B. Sun et al., “Electrospun
chitosan/sericin composite nanofibers with
antibacterial property as potential wound
dressings,” International Journal of Biological
Macromolecules, vol. 68, pp. 92–97, 2014.
[38] Y. H. Zhao, Y. Zhou, X. M. Wu, L. Wang, L.
Xu, and S. C. Wei, “A facile method for
electrospinning of Ag nanoparticles/poly (vinyl
alcohol)/carboxymethyl-chitosan nanofibers,”
Applied Surface Science, vol. 258, no. 22, pp.
Google Scholar

[39] R. Liu, X. Xu, X. Zhuang, and B. Cheng,
“Solution blowing of chitosan/PVA hydrogel
nanofiber mats,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol.
101, no. 1, pp. 1116–1121, 2014. View at:
Publisher Site | Google Scholar
[40] H. Y. Ma, C. Burger, B. S. Hsiao, and B. Chu,
“Fabrication and characterization of cellulose
nanofiber based thin-film nanofibrous
composite membranes,” Journal of Membrane
Science, vol. 454, pp. 272–282, 2014. View at:
[41] L. Fu, J. Zhang, and G. Yang, “Present status
and applications of bacterial cellulose-based
materials for skin tissue repair,” Carbohydrate
[42] L. M. M. Costa, G. M. Olyveira, P. Basmaji,
and L. X. Filho, “Nanopores structure in
electrospun bacterial cellulose,” Journal of
Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology, vol. 3,
pp. 92–96, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
[43] N. Shah, M. Ul-Islam, W. A. Khattak, and J. K.
Park, “Overview of bacterial cellulose
composites: a multipurpose advanced material,”
Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 98, no. 2, pp.
Google Scholar
[44] P. Chen, Y. S. Yun, H. Bak, S. Y. Cho, and H.-
J. Jin, “Multiwalled carbon nanotubes-
embedded electrospun bacterial cellulose
nanofibers,” Molecular Crystals and Liquid
Crystals, vol. 519, pp. 169–178, 2010. View at:
[45] E. Omollo, C. Zhang, J. I. Mwasiagi, and S.
Ncube, “Electrospinning cellulose acetate
nanofibers and a study of their possible use in
high-efficiency filtration,” Journal of Industrial
Textiles, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google
Scholar
[46] K. T. Shalumon, K. H. Anulekha, S. V. Nair, S.
V. Nair, K. P. Chennazhi, and R. Jayakumar,
“Sodium alginate/poly(vinyl alcohol)/nano ZnO
composite nanofibers for antibacterial wound
dressings,” International Journal of Biological
Macromolecules, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 247–254,
2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
[47] N. Bhattarai and M. Zhang, “Controlled
synthesis and structural stability of alginate-
based nanofibers,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18,
no. 45, Article ID 455601, 2007. View at:
[48] S. A. Stone, P. Gosavi, T. J. Athauda, and R. R.
Ozer, “In situ citric acid crosslinking of
alginate/polyvinyl alcohol electrospun
nanofibers,” Materials Letters, vol. 112, pp. 32–
Scholar
[49] V. Leung, R. Hartwell, S. S. Elizei, H. J. Yang,
A. Ghahary, and F. Ko, “Postelectrospinning
modifications for alginate nanofiber-based
wound dressings,” Journal of Biomedical
Materials Research Part B Applied
Biomaterials, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 508–515,
[50] K. Y. Lee, L. Jeong, Y. O. Kang, S. J. Lee, and
W. H. Park, “Electrospinning of
polysaccharides for regenerative medicine,”
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 61, no.
12, pp. 1020–1032, 2009. View at: Publisher
[51] D. W. Fang, Y. Liu, S. Jiang, J. Nie, and G. P.
Ma, “Effect of intermolecular interaction on
electrospinning of sodium alginate,”
Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 276–
Scholar
[52] G. P. Ma, D. W. Fang, Y. Liu, X. D. Zhu, and
J. Nie, “Electrospun sodium
alginate/poly(ethylene oxide) core-shell
nanofibers scaffolds potential for tissue
engineering applications,” Carbohydrate
[53] S. A. Park, K. E. Park, and W. D. Kim,
“Preparation of sodium alginate/poly(ethylene
oxide) blend nanofibers with lecithin,”
Macromolecular Research, vol. 18, no. 9, pp.
Google Scholar
[54] S. Safi, M. Morshed, S. A. H. Ravandi, and M.
Ghiaci, “Study of electrospinning of sodium
alginate, blended solutions of sodium
alginate/poly(vinyl alcohol) and sodium
alginate/poly(ethylene oxide),” Journal of
Applied Polymer Science, vol. 104, no. 5, pp.
Google Scholar
[55] V. M. Merkle, P. L. Tran, M. Hutchinson et al.,
“Core-shell PVA/gelatin electrospun nanofibers
promote human umbilical vein endothelial cell
and smooth muscle cell proliferation and
migration,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 27, pp. 77–

Scholar
[56] R.-Y. Tsai, S.-C. Hung, J.-Y. Lai, D.-M. Wang,
and H.-J. Hsieh, “Electrospun chitosan-gelatin-
polyvinyl alcohol hybrid nanofibrous mats:
production and characterization,” Journal of the
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol.
45, no. 4, pp. 1975–1981, 2014. View at:
[57] M. Fallah, S. H. Bahrami, and R. M. Marziyeh,
“Fabrication and characterization of
PCL/gelatin/curcumin nanofibers and their
antibacterial properties,” Journal of Industrial
Textiles, pp. 1–16, 2015. View at: Publisher
[58] K. Jalaja, P. R. A. Kumar, T. Dey, S. C. Kundu,
and N. R. James, “Modified dextran cross-
linked electrospun gelatin nanofibres for
biomedical applications,” Carbohydrate
Polymers, vol. 114, pp. 467–475, 2014. View
at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
[59] T. H. Nguyen and B. T. Lee, “Fabrication and
characterization of cross-linked gelatin electro-
spun nano-fibers,” Journal of Biomedical
Science and Engineering, vol. 3, no. 12, pp.
Google Scholar
[60] Y. Z. Zhang, J. Venugopal, Z.-M. Huang, C. T.
Lim, and S. Ramakrishna, “Crosslinking of the
electrospun gelatin nanofibers,” Polymer, vol.
47, no. 8, pp. 2911–2917, 2006. View at:
[61] J. H. Ko, H. Yin, J. An et al., “Characterization
of cross-linked gelatin nanofibers through
electrospinning,” Macromolecular Research,
vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 137–143, 2010. View at:
[62] Z.-M. Huang, Y. Z. Zhang, S. Ramakrishna,
and C. T. Lim, “Electrospinning and
mechanical characterization of gelatin
nanofibers,” Polymer, vol. 45, no. 15, pp.
Google Scholar
[63] C. S. Ki, D. H. Baek, K. D. Gang, K. H. Lee, I.
C. Um, and Y. H. Park, “Characterization of
gelatin nanofiber prepared from gelatin-formic
acid solution,” Polymer, vol. 46, no. 14, pp.
Google Scholar
[64] J.-H. Song, H.-E. Kim, and H.-W. Kim,
“Production of electrospun gelatin nanofiber by
water-based co-solvent approach,” Journal of
Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol.
19, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 2008. View at: Publisher
[65] K. Sisson, C. Zhang, M. C. Farach-Carson, D.
B. Chase, and J. F. Rabolt, “Evaluation of
cross-linking methods for electrospun gelatin
on cell growth and viability,”
Biomacromolecules, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1675–
Scholar
[66] W. P. Lu, M. Ma, H. T. Xu, B. Zhang, X. F.
Cao, and Y. C. Guo, “Gelatin nanofibers
prepared by spiral-electrospinning and cross-
linked by vapor and liquid-phase
glutaraldehyde,” Materials Letters, vol. 140, pp.
1–4, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google
Scholar
[67] P. Slemming-Adamsen, J. Song, M. Dong, F.
Besenbacher, and M. Chen, “In situ cross-
linked PNIPAM/gelatin nanofibers for thermo-
responsive drug release,” Macromolecular
Materials and Engineering, vol. 300, no. 12, pp.
Google Scholar
[68] H. W. Kwak, M. J. Kang, J. H. Bae et al.,
“Fabrication of Phaeodactylum tricornutum
extract-loaded gelatin nanofibrous mats
exhibiting antimicrobial activity,” International
Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 63,
Google Scholar
[69] Y.-H. Shan, L.-H. Peng, X. Liu, X. Chen, J.
Xiong, and J.-Q. Gao, “Silk fibroin/gelatin
electrospun nanofibrous dressing functionalized
with astragaloside IV induces healing and anti-
scar effects on burn wound,” International
Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 479, no. 2, pp.
Google Scholar
[70] X. T. Han, Z. G. Xing, S. X. Si, Y. Y. Yao, and
Q. Y. Zhang, “Electrospun grape seed
polyphenols/gelatin composite fibers contained
silver nanoparticles as biomaterials,” Fibers and
Polymers, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 2572–2580,
[71] E. K. Brenner, J. D. Schiffman, E. A.
Thompson, L. J. Toth, and C. L. Schauer,
“Electrospinning of hyaluronic acid nanofibers
from aqueous ammonium solutions,”
Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 926–

Scholar
[72] C.-H. Chen, S.-H. Chen, K. T. Shalumon, and
J.-P. Chen, “Dual functional core-sheath
electrospun hyaluronic acid/polycaprolactone
nanofibrous membranes embedded with silver
nanoparticles for prevention of peritendinous
adhesion,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 26, pp.
Google Scholar
[73] R. Uppal, G. N. Ramaswamy, C. Arnold, R.
Goodband, and Y. Wang, “Hyaluronic acid
nanofiber wound dressing—production,
characterization, and in vivo behavior,” Journal
of Biomedical Materials Research Part B:
Applied Biomaterials, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 20–29,
[74] Z. G. Chen, P. W. Wang, B. Wei, X. M. Mo,
and F. Z. Cui, “Electrospun collagen-chitosan
nanofiber: a biomimetic extracellular matrix for
endothelial cell and smooth muscle cell,” Acta
Biomaterialia, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 372–382, 2010.
[75] K. S. Rho, L. Jeong, G. Lee et al.,
“Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers: effects
on the behavior of normal human keratinocytes
and early-stage wound healing,” Biomaterials,
vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1452–1461, 2006. View at:
[76] S.-J. Liu, Y.-C. Kau, C.-Y. Chou, J.-K. Chen,
R.-C. Wu, and W.-L. Yeh, “Electrospun
PLGA/collagen nanofibrous membrane as
early-stage wound dressing,” Journal of
Membrane Science, vol. 355, no. 1-2, pp. 53–
Scholar
[77] L. Huang, K. Nagapudi, P. R. Apkarian, and E.
L. Chaikof, “Engineered collagen-PEO
nanofibers and fabrics,” Journal of Biomaterials
Science—Polymer Edition, vol. 12, no. 9, pp.
Google Scholar
[78] E. Schnell, K. Klinkhammer, S. Balzer et al.,
“Guidance of glial cell migration and axonal
growth on electrospun nanofibers of poly-ε-
caprolactone and a collagen/poly-ε-
caprolactone blend,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no.
19, pp. 3012–3025, 2007. View at: Publisher
[79] J. S. Choi, S. J. Lee, G. J. Christ, A. Atala, and
J. J. Yoo, “The influence of electrospun aligned
poly(ε-caprolactone)/collagen nanofibermeshes
on the formation of self-aligned skeletal muscle
myotubes,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 19, pp.
Google Scholar
[80] K. Kwon and T. Matsuda, “Co-electrospun
nanofiber fabrics of poly (L-lactide-co-ϵ-
caprolactone) with type I collagen or heparin,”
Biomacromolecules, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2096–
2105, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
[81] Venugopal, S. Low, A. T. Choon, T. S. S.
Kumar, and S. Ramakrishna, “Mineralization of
osteoblasts with electrospun
collagen/hydroxyapatite nanofibers,” Journal of
Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol.
19, no. 5, pp. 2039–2046, 2008. View at:
[82] J.-H. Song, H.-E. Kim, and H.-W. Kim,
“Electrospun fibrous web of collagen-apatite
precipitated nanocomposite for bone
regeneration,” Journal of Materials Science:
Materials in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2925–
Scholar
[83] W. He, T. Yong, W. E. Teo, Z. Ma, and S.
Ramakrishna, “Fabrication and
endothelialization of collagen-blended
biodegradable polymer nanofibers: potential
vascular graft for blood vessel tissue
engineering,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 11, no.
9-10, pp. 1574–1588, 2005. View at: Publisher
[84] J.-P. Chen, G.-Y. Chang, and J.-K. Chen,
“Electrospun collagen/chitosan nanofibrous
membrane as wound dressing,” Colloids and
Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering
Aspects, vol. 313-314, pp. 183–188, 2008.
[85] T. Liu, J. Xu, B. P. Chan, and S. Y. Chew,
“Sustained release of neurotrophin-3 and
chondroitinase ABC from electrospun collagen
nanofiber scaffold for spinal cord injury
repair,” Journal of Biomedical Materials
Research Part A, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 236–242,
[86] S. H. Kim, Y. S. Nam, T. S. Lee, and W. H.
Park, “Silk fibroin nanofiber. Electrospinning,
properties, and structure,” Polymer Journal, vol.
35, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 2003. View at:
[87] Jeong, K. Y. Lee, J. W. Liu, and W. H. Park,
“Time-resolved structural investigation of
regenerated silk fibroin nanofibers treated with

solvent vapor,” International Journal of
Biological Macromolecules, vol. 38, no. 2, pp.
Google Scholar
[88] B.-M. Min, L. Jeong, K. Y. Lee, and W. H.
Park, “Regenerated silk fibroin nanofibers:
water vapor-induced structural changes and
their effects on the behavior of normal human
cells,” Macromolecular Bioscience, vol. 6, no.
4, pp. 285–292, 2006. View at: Publisher Site |
Google Scholar
[89] Jeong, D. Cho, O. H. Kwon, B.-M. Min, and
W. H. Park, “Cellular response of silk fibroin
nanofibers containing silver nanoparticles in
vitro,” Macromolecular Research, vol. 22, no.
7, pp. 796–803, 2014. View at: Publisher Site |
Google Scholar
[90] S. Shahverdi, M. Hajimiri, M. A. Esfandiari et
al., “Fabrication and structure analysis of
poly(lactide-co-glycolic acid)/silk fibroin
hybrid scaffold for wound dressing
applications,” International Journal of
Pharmaceutics, vol. 473, no. 1-2, pp. 345–355,
[91] S. Çalamak, C. Erdoğdu, M. Özalp, and K.
Ulubayram, “Silk fibroin based antibacterial
bionanotextiles as wound dressing materials,”
Materials Science and Engineering C, vol. 43,
Google Scholar
[92] J. Chutipakdeevong, U. Ruktanonchai, and P.
Supaphol, “Hybrid biomimetic electrospun
fibrous mats derived from poly(ε-caprolactone)
and silk fibroin protein for wound dressing
application,” Journal of Applied Polymer
Science, vol. 132, no. 11, Article ID 41653,
[93] S. Calamak, E. A. Aksoy, C. Erdogdu, M.
Sagıroglu, and K. Ulubayram, “Silver
nanoparticle containing silk fibroin
bionanotextiles,” Journal of Nanoparticle
Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2015. View
at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
[94] Slaughter, B.; Shahana, S.; Fisher, O.;
Khademhosseini, A.; Peppas, N. Hydrogels in
regenerative medicine. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21,
3307–3329. [Google Scholar]
[CrossRef][Green Version]
[95] Kamoun, E.A.; Kenawy, E.S.; Tamer, T.M.; El-
Meligy, M.A.; Mohy, E.M.S. Poly (vinyl
alcohol)-alginate physically crosslinked
hydrogel membranes for wound dressing
applications: Characterization and bio-
evaluation. Arab J. Chem. 2015, 8, 38–47.
[96] Hussain, Z.; Thu, H.E.; Shuid, A.N.; Katas, H.;
Hussain, F. Recent Advances in Polymer-based
Wound Dressings for the Treatment of Diabetic
Foot Ulcer: An Overview of State-of-the-art.
Curr. Drug Targets 2017, 18, 527–550.
[97] Dobrzański, L.A.; Hudecki, A.; Chladek, G.;
Król, W.; Mertas, A. Biodegradable and
antimicrobial polycaprolactone nanofibers with
and without silver precipitates. Arch. Mat. Sci.
Eng. 2015, 76, 5–26.
[98] Esentürk, M.S. Erdal, S. Güngör,
Electrospinning method to produce drug-loaded
nanofibers for topical/transdermal drug delivery
applications.
[99] J. Pelipenko, P. Kocbek, J. Kristl, Critical
attributes of nanofibers: preparation, drug
loading, and tissue regeneration, International
journal of pharmaceutics, 484(1-2), 57-74,
(2015).
[100] Petrovic ZS. Polyurethanes. In: Kricheldorf
HR, Nuyken O, Swift G, editors. Handbook of
Polymer Synthesis. New York: Marcel Dekker;
2005. p. 965
[101] Ulrich H. Polyurethanes. In: Mark HF, editor.
Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and
Technology. 3rd ed. Vol. 4. Hoboken: Wiley;
2003
[102] Sambaer W, Zatloukal M, Kimmer D. 3D
modeling of filtration process via polyurethane
nanofiber based nonwoven filters prepared by
electrospinning process. Chemical Engineering
Science. 2011;66(4):613-623.
DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2010.10.035
[103] Jeong EH, Yang J, Youk JH. Preparation of
polyurethane cationomer nanofiber mats for use
in antimicrobial nanofilter applications.
Materials Letters. 2007;61(18):3991-3994.
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.01.003
[104] Rezvantalab, S.; Drude, N.I.; Moraveji, M.K.;
Güvener, N.; Koons, E.K.; Shi, Y.; Lammers,
T.; Kiessling, F. PLGA-Based Nanoparticles in
Cancer Treatment. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9,
1260.
[105] Acharya, S.; Sahoo, S.K. PLGA Nanoparticles
Containing Various Anticancer Agents and
Tumour Delivery by EPR Effect. Adv. Drug
Deliv. Rev. 2011, 63, 170–183.

[106] Schliecker, G.; Schmidt, C.; Fuchs, S.; Kissel,
T. Characterization of a Homologous Series of
D, L-Lactic Acid Oligomers; a Mechanistic
Study on the Degradation Kinetics in Vitro.
Biomaterials 2003, 24, 3835–3844.
[107] Zhang, Y.; García-Gabilondo, M.; Rosell, A.;
Roig, A. MRI/Photoluminescence Dual-Modal
Imaging Magnetic PLGA Nanocapsules for
Theranostics. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 16.
[108] Khalil, N.M.; do Nascimento, T.C.F.; Casa,
D.M.; Dalmolin, L.F.; de Mattos, A.C.; Hoss,
I.; Romano, M.A.; Mainardes, R.M.
Pharmacokinetics of Curcumin-Loaded PLGA
and PLGA-PEG Blend Nanoparticles after Oral
Administration in Rats. Colloids Surf. B
Biointerfaces 2013, 101, 353–360.
[109] Wang, Y.; Qu, W.; Choi, S.H. FDA’s
Regulatory Science Program for Generic
PLA/PLGA-Based Drug Products. Available
online:
https://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.co
m/Featured-Articles/188841-FDA-s-
Regulatory-Science-Program-forGeneric-PLA-
PLGA-Based-Drug-Products/ (accessed on 1
March 2021).
[110] Smith LE, Rimmer S, MacNeil S. Examination
of the effects of poly (N-vinylpyrrolidinone)
hydrogels in direct and indirect contact with
cells. Biomaterials. 2006;27(14):2806-2812
[111] Teodorescu M, Bercea M, Morariu S.
Biomaterials of PVA and PVP in medical and
pharmaceutical applications: Perspectives and
challenges. Biotechnology Advances.
2019;37(1):109-131
[112] Rowe RC, Sheskey P, Quinn M. Handbook of
Pharmaceutical Excipients. Argentina: Libros
Digitales-Pharmaceutical Press; 2009
[113] Yu DG, Zhang XF, Shen XX, Brandford-White
C, Zhu LM. Ultrafine ibuprofen-loaded
polyvinylpyrrolidone fiber mats using
electrospinning. Polymer International.
2009;58(9):1010-1013
[114] Prosapio V, De Marco I, Reverchon E.
PVP/corticosteroid microspheres produced by
supercritical antisolvent coprecipitation.
Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016;292:264-
275

Polymers Used in Preparation of Nanofibers

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Polymers Used in Preparation of Nanofibers (20)

More from ijtsrd (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Polymers Used in Preparation of Nanofibers