PONTICS IN FIXED PARTIAL
DENTURE
1
PRESENTED BY
DR RENUKA DANGE
CONTENTS
2
 INTRODUCTION
 DEFINITION
 PRETREATMENT ASSESSMENT
 PONTIC SPACE
 RESIDUAL RIDGE CONTOUR
 SURGICAL MODIFICATION
 GINGIVAL ARCHITECTURE PRESERVATION
 CLASSIFICATION OF PONTICS
 BIOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS
 MECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS
 ESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS
 CROSS REFERENCES
 REFERENCES
• Esthetic appearance
• Enabling adequate oral hygiene
• Preventing tissue irritation
3
INTRODUCTION
ACCORDING TO :
 GPT-8
An artificial tooth on a fixed dental prosthesis that replaces a missing
natural tooth, restores its function, and usually fills the space
previously occupied by the clinical crown.
 TYLMAN
the suspended member of a fixed partial denture which replaces the
lost natural tooth, restores function and occupies the space of the
missing tooth.
4
DEFINITION
.
The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005;94(1):10-92.
Tylman SMalone W. Tylman's Theory and practice of fixed prosthodontics. 8th ed.
1
OPTIMAL PONTIC DESIGN
5
PRETREATMENT ASSESSMENT
6
I] PONTIC SPACE:
One function of FPD is to prevent tilting or drifting of the
adjacent teeth into the edentulous space.
Drifting / tilting
Reduced pontic space
Difficulty in fabricating pontic
ESTHETIC ZONE
• Orthodontic alignment
• Abutment modification with
complete coverage retainers
NONESTHETIC ZONE
• Overly small pontics are
unacceptable
•Trap food
•Difficult to clean
•Careful diagnostic waxing to
determine most appropriate
treatment
7
81
2) RESIDUAL RIDGE CONTOUR
8
Features of Ideal Ridge
Contour:
 Smooth and regular surface of
attached gingiva -Facilitate
maintenance of plaque-free
environment
 Sufficient height and width -
Mimic adjacent tooth contours-
Appear to emerge from the
ridge
 Facially, free of frenal
attachment
LOSS OF RESIDUAL RIDGE CONTOUR:
 Unesthetic open gingival embrasures “BLACK
TRIANGLES”
 Food impaction
 Percolation of saliva during speech
9
81
10
SIEBERT’S CLASSIFICATION OF RESIDUAL RIDGE DEFORMITIES :
 Class I defects 
Faciolingual loss of
tissue width with
normal ridge height.
 Class II defects 
Loss of ridge height
with normal ridge
width.
 Class III defects 
a combination of loss in
both dimensions.
CLASSIFICATION
1. Depending on shape of surface
contacting the ridge(Tylman)
 Sanitary
 Modified sanitary
 Spheroidal
 Saddle
 Ridge lap
 Modified ridgelap
 Ovate
2.According To Rosenstiel
Depending On Mucosal Contact
 A. Mucosal contact
Ridge Lap
Modified Ridge Lap
Ovate
Conical
 B. No Mucosal Contact
Sanitary(hygenic)
Modified Sanitary
3. Based on materials used
• Metal and porcelain veneered
• Metal and resin veneered
• All metal pontic
• All ceramic pontic
4. METHOD OF FABRICATION:
• Custom made pontic
12
Pontic selection depends primarily on esthetics and oral hygiene.
 ANTERIOR REGION
 POSTERIOR REGIONS
13
PONTIC SELECTION
ANTERIOR PONTIC DESIGN – a
correctly placed anterior pontic should
have
1. All surfaces should be convex, smooth
and properly finished.
2. Contact with the labial mucosa should
be minimal (pin point) and pressure
free (lap facing).
3. The lingual contour should be in
harmony with adjacent teeth or pontics.
14
Pontic- residual ridge relationship: A research report.
Stein RS, J Prosthet Dent 1966; 16: 251
POSTERIOR PONTIC DESIGN – a correctly designed pontic
should have
1. All surfaces should be convex, smooth and properly finished.
2. Contact with the buccal contiguous slopes should be minimal (pin
point) and pressure free (modified ridge lap).
3. Occlusal table must be in functional harmony with the occlusion
of all of the teeth
4. Buccal and lingual shunting mechanism should conform to those
of the adjacent teeth.
5. The overall length of buccal surface should be equal to that of the
adjacent abutments or pontics.
15
Pontic- residual ridge relationship: A research report. Stein RS, J Prosthet Dent 1966; 16: 251
PRE-FABRICATED PONTIC FACINGS
These are commercially available porcelain pontics which can be
altered by the dentist and reglazed if necessary. These include:
a) Trupontic – A horizontal tubular slot in the
center of the lingual surface of the facing.
b) Interchangeable facings/flat back facing–
Manufactured with vertical slot running down
the flat lingual surface, this facing is retained
with a lug which engages the retention slot.
16
c) Sanitary facing –flat occlusal
surface and a slot on the proximal
surface to fit into the metal
projections made in the FDP
d) Pin facing – A flat lingual facing
with two horizontal pins for
retention.
17
e) Modified Pin Facing
Facing is modified by adding porcelain
to lingual gingival area of a pin facing
f) Reverse pin facing – Porcelain
denture teeth can be modified to
be used as the bridge facing.
Porcelain is added to the gingival
end of the facing and multiple
precision pin holes are drilled into
the lingual surface
81
18
g. Harmony facing –
This facing is supplied with an
uncontoured porcelain gingival
surface and usually two retentive
pins on the flat lingual side.
h. Porcelain fused to metal facing
Facing consists of a metal core over
which porcelain is fused.
i. Pontips:
Convex gingival surface having
pinpoint tissue contact and attached
to the backing occlusally with
retentive pins.
81
19
SANITARY OR HYGIENIC PONTIC
 Zero tissue contact
 Occlusalgingival thickness should be atleast 3mm
 Convex mesiodistally and faciolingually
 Space beneath the pontic – 2mm ( Rosenstiel)
 - 3 mm ( Tylman)
 Adequate space for cleaning
 Modified sanitary pontic:- gingival portion
is shaped like a concave archway mesiodistally
between the retainers and convex faciolingually.
 Allows increased connector size while
decreasing the stress concentrated in the pontic
and connectors.
 Recommended for mandibular posteriors
FISH BELLY
ARC-FIXED OR PEREL
81
20
A modified sanitary pontic
21
Perel M L : J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28: 587
SADDLE PONTIC OR RIDGE LAP PONTIC
The saddle pontic has a concave fitting surface that overlaps the
residual ridge buccolingually, simulating the contours and emergence
profile of the missing tooth on both sides of the residual ridge.
22
 Saddle or ridge lap designs should be avoided
 The concave gingival surface of the pontic is not accessible to cleaning
with dental floss>>>>plaque accumulation>>>>> tissue inflammation.
23
The modified ridge lap pontic combines the best features of the hygienic
and saddle pontic designs, combining esthetics with easy cleaning.
24
MODIFIED RIDGE LAP PONTIC
• Overlaps the residual ridge on
the facial (to achieve the
appearance of a tooth emerging
from the gingiva)
• Remains clear of the ridge on
the lingual side.
81
Tissue contact should resemble a letter T whose vertical arm ends at the
crest of the ridge.
The ridge contact should be upto the midline of the edentulous ridge.
 Most common pontic form used in areas of high visibility---
 maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth and maxillary premolars and
first molars
25
CONICAL PONTIC
• egg-shaped, bullet-shaped, or
heart-shaped
• Convex with only one point of
contact at the center of the
residual ridge.
• recommended for the
replacement of mandibular
posterior teeth where esthetics is
a lesser concern.
26
The facial and lingual contours are dependent on the width of the
residual ridge;
 a knife-edged residual ridge necessitates flatter contours with a
narrow tissue contact area.
 This type of design may be unsuitable for broad residual ridges,
because the emergence profile associated with the small tissue
contact point may create areas of food entrapment
27
Rosenstiel S F et al : Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th edn
 most esthetically appealing
 Its convex tissue surface resides
in a soft tissue depression or
hollow in the residual ridge,
which makes it appear that a tooth
is literally emerging from the
gingiva
28
OVATE PONTIC
Rosenstiel S F et al : Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th edn
Socket-preservation techniques
should be performed at the time
of extraction to create the tissue
recess from which the ovate
pontic form will emerge.
For a preexisting residual ridge,
soft tissue surgical
augmentation is typically
required. When an adequate
volume of ridge tissue is
established, a socket depression
is sculpted into the ridge with
surgical diamonds or
electrosurgery. 29
Rosenstiel S F et al : Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th edn
30
Rosenstiel S F et al : Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th edn
The biologic principles of pontic design pertain to the maintenance
and preservation of the residual ridge, abutment and opposing teeth,
and supporting tissue.
Factors of specific influence are,
31
BIOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS
 Pressure free contact between the pontic and the underlying tissue is
indicated to prevented ulceration and inflammation of the soft tissues.
 When a pontic rests on mucosa, some ulcerations may appear as a result
of the normal movement of the mucosa in contact with the pontic.
 Positive ridge pressure (hyperpressure) may be caused by excessive
scraping of the ridge area on the definitive cast
32
RIDGE CONTACT
Ridge irritation microbial plaque between the gingival surface
of the pontic and the residual ridge
tissue inflammation and calculus formation.
33
ORAL HYGIENE CONSIDERATIONS
Normally, where tissue contact
occurs, the gingival surface of a
pontic is inaccessible to the bristles
of a tooth brush. Therefore, excellent
hygiene habits must be developed by
the patient.
34
Devices such as proxy brushes, pipe
cleaners, Oral-B Super Floss, and
dental floss with a threader are highly
recommended
Gingival embrasures around the pontic
should be wide enough to permit oral
hygiene aids.
 Should provide good esthetic results, biocompatibility, rigidity, and
strength to withstand occlusal forces; and longevity.
 Occlusal contacts should not fall on the junction between metal and
porcelain during centric or eccentric tooth contacts, nor should a metal
ceramic junction occur in contact with the residual ridge on the gingival
surface of the pontic.
 Investigations into the biocompatibility of materials used to
fabricate pontics have centered on two factors :
1. The effect of the materials and
2. The effects of surface adherence.
35
PONTIC MATERIAL
 Well-polished gold is smoother, less prone
to corrosion, and less retentive of plaque
than an unpolished or porous casting.
 For easier plaque removal and
biocompatibility, the tissue surface of the
pontic should be made in glazed porcelain
 However, ceramic tissue contact may be
contraindicated in edentulous areas where
there is minimal distance between the
residual ridge and the occlusal table.
36
HENRY P J ET AL: TISSUE CHANGES BENEATH FIXED
PARTIAL DENTURES. J PROSTHET DENT 1966; 16: 937
 placed 14 pontics on human gingival tissue.
 gingival response to polished gold, Glazed porcelain or unglazed
porcelain
 there were general histologic changes in the tissue under all the
materials tested.
 noted that glazed porcelain was the most hygienic material used and it
is superior in terms of esthetics and ease of cleaning.
37
 Reducing the buccolingual width of the pontic by as much as 30%
 12% increase in chewing efficiency can be expected from a one
third reduction of pontic width.
 Narrowing the occlusal table may actually impede the development
of a harmonious and stable occlusal relationship
 Difficulties in plaque control and improper cheek support.
 Pontics with normal occlusal widths (at least on the occlusal third)
are generally recommended.
 One exception is if the residual alveolar ridge has collapsed
buccolingually. Reducing pontic width may then be desired,
thereby lessening the lingual contour and facilitating plaque control
measures. 38
OCCLUSAL FORCES
Mechanical problems may be caused by
 improper choice of materials
 poor frame work design
 poor tooth preparation
 poor occlusion.
 Therefore, evaluating the likely
forces on a pontic and designing
accordingly are important. For
example, a strong all metal pontic
may be needed in high stress
situations rather than a metal ceramic
pontic which would be more
susceptible to fracture.
39
MECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS
 A well fabricated metal ceramic
pontic is strong, easy to keep clean,
and looks natural.
40
METAL CERAMIC PONTICS
 The framework must provide a
uniform veneer of porcelain
(approximately 1.2 mm).
 The metal surfaces to be veneered
must be smooth and free of pits
 Sharp angles on the veneering area
should be rounded.
 Occlusal centric contacts must be
placed at least 1.5 mm away from
the metal-porcelain junction
 Resistance to abrasion is lower than enamel or porcelain,
 no chemical bond existed between the resin and the metal framework,
41
RESIN-VENEERED PONTICS
• Continuous dimensional change of the
veneers often caused leakage at the
metal-resin interface, with subsequent
discoloration of the restoration.
• New-generation indirect resins-
High flexural strength, minimal
polymerization shrinkage, and wear
rates comparable with those of tooth
enamel
 Composite resins can be used in fixed partial dentures without a
metal substructure.
 A substructure matrix of impregnated glass or polymer fiber
provides structural strength.
 Excellent marginal adaptation and esthetics
42
FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITE RESIN
PONTICS
 No matter how well biologic and mechanical principles have been
followed during fabrication, the patient will evaluate the result by
how it looks, especially when anterior teeth have been replaced.
43
ESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS
 The modified ridge-lap pontic is
recommended for most anterior
situations; it compensates for lost
buccolingual width in the residual
ridge by overlapping what remains
 However, When appearance is of
utmost concern, the ovate pontic,
used in conjunction with alveolar
preservation or soft tissue ridge
augmentation
44
 Ridge resorption will make a pontic look
too long in the cervical region.
 An abnormal labiolingual position or
cervical contour, however, is not
immediately obvious.
 This fact can be used to produce a pontic of
good appearance by recontouring the
gingival half of the labial surface.
45
INCISOGINGIVAL LENGTH
 In areas where tooth loss is
accompanied by excessive loss
of alveolar bone, the pontic is
shaped to simulate a normal
crown and root with emphasis
on the cementoenamel junction.
The root can be stained to
simulate exposed dentin
46
If augmentative measures are
contraindicated or undesirable,
small alveolar deficiencies and
missing papillae can be
reconstructed by restorative
measures.
 The exact shade of the gingiva
has to be established with
special gingival shade guides.
The basal surface must
demonstrate a convex shape
similar to the ovate pontic
designs for the dental floss to
establish tight contact with
all the surface areas. 47
GINGIVA-COLORED CERAMICS
Daniel E , H Spiekermann: A review of esthetic pontic design options. Quintessence Int
2002;33:736-746
 Separately fabricated ceramic gingival masks can be used to make
subsequent adjustments in permanently placed restorations.
 This method is particularly suitable for patients with a local alveolar
ridge defect that has not been corrected by augmentation of the soft
tissue.
48
ALL-CERAMIC GINGIVAL MASKS
Daniel E , H Spiekermann: A review of esthetic pontic design options. Quintessence Int
2002;33:736-746
CROSS REFERENCES
49
50
J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:205-210
SIMULATED TISSUE USING UNIQUE PONTIC DESIGN
Kim.T.H.Yet al,
51
52
PURPOSE: To evaluate the load-bearing capacities of fiber-
reinforced composite (FRC) fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with
pontics of various materials and thicknesses.
MATERIALS: 72 FDPs with frameworks made of continuous
unidirectional glass fibers (everStick C&B) were fabricated.
Three different pontic materials were used: glass ceramics, polymer
denture teeth, and composite resin.
The FDPs were divided into 3 categories based on the occlusal
thicknesses of the pontics (2.5 mm, 3.2 mm, and 4.0 mm).
Fiber-reinforced Composite Fixed Dental Prostheses
with Various Pontics
The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry2014Vol 16, No 2
53
CONCLUSION:
• By increasing the occlusal
thickness of the pontic, the
load-bearing capacity of the
FRC FDPs may be increased.
• The highest load-bearing
capacity was obtained with 4.0
mm thickness in the ceramic
pontic.
• However, with thinner pontics,
polymer denture teeth and
composite pontics resulted in
higher load-bearing values
54
PREFABRICATED WAX PONTICS
Advantages:
* Without collar
* Reduced occlusal depths
* Reinforced approximal surfaces
* Perfect scraping and modelling
characteristics
Primary use: Temporary
Bridges
Plastic to fabricate quick and
economical temporary
bridges.
•Wear-resistant, vacuum-
processed synthetic resin
•Special lingual channel
ensures pontic locks into the
plastic
 The pontic design is said to determine the success or failure of a
bridge.
 Designs that allow easy plaque control are especially important to a
pontic’s long term success.
 Minimizing tissue contact by maximizing the convexity of the
pontic’s gingival surface is essential.
 Special consideration is also needed to create a design that
combines easy maintenance with natural appearance and adequate
mechanical strength.
55
CONCLUSION
The dentist should not attempt to duplicate nature exactly,
but should attempt to support it by supplying a prosthesis
based on sound biomechanical principles.
1. Rosenstiel S F et al : Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics,
4th edn Missouri, Mosby Inc, pg 513
2. Shillingburg H T et al : Fundamentals of fixed
prosthodontics, ed 4, Chicago , Quintessence
Publishing, pg 485
3. Tylman SMalone W. Tylman's Theory and practice of fixed
prosthodontics. 8th ed.
4. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. The Journal of
Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005;94(1):10-92.
5. Cavozos E : Tissue response to fixed partial denture pontics.
J Prosthet Dent 1968; 20: 143
6. Daniel Edelhoff, H Spiekermann: A review of esthetic
pontic design options. Quintessence Int 2002;33:736-746
7. Henry P J et al: Tissue changes beneath fixed partial
dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1966; 16: 937
56
REFERENCES
7. Perel M L : A modified sanitary pontic. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28:
587
8. Stein RS: Pontic- residual ridge relationship: A research report. J
Prosthet Dent 1966; 16: 251
9. Korman R. Enhancing Esthetics with a Fixed Prosthesis Utilizing
an Innovative Pontic Design and Periodontal Plastic Surgery.
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2014;27(1):13-28.
10. Fiber-reinforced Composite Fixed Dental Prostheses with Various
Pontics The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry2014Vol 16, No 2
11. Kim T, Cascione D, Knezevic A. Simulated tissue using a unique
pontic design: A clinical report. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
2009;102(4):205-210.
12. Purra AMushtaq M. Aesthetic replacement of an anterior tooth
using the natural tooth as a pontic; an innovative technique. The
Saudi Dental Journal. 2013;25(3):125-128. 57
58
THANK YOU

More Related Content

PPTX
Attachments in removable partial prosthesis
PPTX
01. removable partial denture
DOCX
Materials used in Removable Partial Denture
PPTX
Implant treatment plan for completely edentulous patient
PPTX
Golden proportion
PPT
effect of aging on edentulous state
PPT
Max/prosthodontic courses
PPT
Balanced occlusion
Attachments in removable partial prosthesis
01. removable partial denture
Materials used in Removable Partial Denture
Implant treatment plan for completely edentulous patient
Golden proportion
effect of aging on edentulous state
Max/prosthodontic courses
Balanced occlusion

What's hot (20)

PPTX
CONNECTORS IN FPD.pptx
PPT
Surveying and Designing in Cast Partial Denture
PPTX
Lingualized occlusion in rdp
PPTX
Gothic arch tracing.
PPTX
Loading protocols in implant
PPTX
Design of a fixed Partial Denture (with Abutment Tooth Preparation)
PPTX
Failures in Fixed Partial Denture
PPTX
Stability in complete dentures
PPTX
Centric Relation .pptx
PPTX
Minor connectors, rests & rests seats In prosthodontics
PPTX
Occlusion in Removable Partial Dentures
PPTX
Biomechanics in removable partial denture
PPTX
Coronoplasty
PPTX
04- Occlusion in prosthodontics- Concepts of occlusion.ppt
PPTX
Lingualised occlusion revisited
PPTX
Gothic arch tracers
PPTX
MANDIBULAR MOVEMENTS
PPTX
Evidence Based Prosthodontics
PPTX
Precision attachments
PPTX
Non rigid connectors in fixed prosthesis / cosmetic dentistry training
CONNECTORS IN FPD.pptx
Surveying and Designing in Cast Partial Denture
Lingualized occlusion in rdp
Gothic arch tracing.
Loading protocols in implant
Design of a fixed Partial Denture (with Abutment Tooth Preparation)
Failures in Fixed Partial Denture
Stability in complete dentures
Centric Relation .pptx
Minor connectors, rests & rests seats In prosthodontics
Occlusion in Removable Partial Dentures
Biomechanics in removable partial denture
Coronoplasty
04- Occlusion in prosthodontics- Concepts of occlusion.ppt
Lingualised occlusion revisited
Gothic arch tracers
MANDIBULAR MOVEMENTS
Evidence Based Prosthodontics
Precision attachments
Non rigid connectors in fixed prosthesis / cosmetic dentistry training
Ad

Similar to PONTICS IN FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE FOR ORAL (20)

PPTX
PONTICS IN Fixed partial denture - Prodthodontics.pptx
PPT
Pontics in Fixed Partial Dentures
PPTX
Pontics in Fixed partial denture in prostho
PPTX
Pontic and pontic designs
PPTX
5-PONTICS.pptx
PPTX
Pontics in Fixed Partial Denture
PPTX
pontics in the prosthetic dentistry
PPTX
Pontics in fpd
PDF
bridge and pontic design lecture
PPTX
pontics in FPD (prosthodontics)
PPT
Emergence profile in fixed partial denture.
PPTX
Pontics Kashish
PPTX
Mandibular Major Connectors
PPT
Pontic
PPTX
Principles of tooth preparation
PPTX
vinay contacts and contours-1.pptx
PDF
Pedo.pdf
PPTX
Occlusion in conservative dentistry
PPTX
Interrelationship between periodontics-Restorative Dentistry.pptx
PPTX
Resto perio ( ahmed al hafez)
PONTICS IN Fixed partial denture - Prodthodontics.pptx
Pontics in Fixed Partial Dentures
Pontics in Fixed partial denture in prostho
Pontic and pontic designs
5-PONTICS.pptx
Pontics in Fixed Partial Denture
pontics in the prosthetic dentistry
Pontics in fpd
bridge and pontic design lecture
pontics in FPD (prosthodontics)
Emergence profile in fixed partial denture.
Pontics Kashish
Mandibular Major Connectors
Pontic
Principles of tooth preparation
vinay contacts and contours-1.pptx
Pedo.pdf
Occlusion in conservative dentistry
Interrelationship between periodontics-Restorative Dentistry.pptx
Resto perio ( ahmed al hafez)
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 1
PPTX
Full Slide Deck - SY CF Talk Adelaide 10June.pptx
PPTX
Understanding The Self : 1Sexual health
PDF
Zuri Health Pan-African Digital Health Innovator.pdf
PPTX
Arthritis Types, Signs & Treatment with physiotherapy management
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 11
PPT
Pyramid Points Acid Base Power Point (10).ppt
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 17
PPTX
Obstetric management in women with epilepsy.pptx
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 18
PPT
Pyramid Points Lab Values Power Point(11).ppt
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 15
PPTX
unit1-introduction of nursing education..
PPTX
ACUTE CALCULAR CHOLECYSTITIS: A CASE STUDY
PDF
Essentials of Hysteroscopy at World Laparoscopy Hospital
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 14
PDF
Culturally Sensitive Health Solutions: Engineering Localized Practices (www....
PPTX
HIGHLIGHTS of NDCT 2019 WITH IMPACT ON CLINICAL RESEARCH.pptx
PDF
Back node with known primary managementt
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 13
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 1
Full Slide Deck - SY CF Talk Adelaide 10June.pptx
Understanding The Self : 1Sexual health
Zuri Health Pan-African Digital Health Innovator.pdf
Arthritis Types, Signs & Treatment with physiotherapy management
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 11
Pyramid Points Acid Base Power Point (10).ppt
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 17
Obstetric management in women with epilepsy.pptx
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 18
Pyramid Points Lab Values Power Point(11).ppt
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 15
unit1-introduction of nursing education..
ACUTE CALCULAR CHOLECYSTITIS: A CASE STUDY
Essentials of Hysteroscopy at World Laparoscopy Hospital
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 14
Culturally Sensitive Health Solutions: Engineering Localized Practices (www....
HIGHLIGHTS of NDCT 2019 WITH IMPACT ON CLINICAL RESEARCH.pptx
Back node with known primary managementt
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 13

PONTICS IN FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE FOR ORAL

  • 1. PONTICS IN FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE 1 PRESENTED BY DR RENUKA DANGE
  • 2. CONTENTS 2  INTRODUCTION  DEFINITION  PRETREATMENT ASSESSMENT  PONTIC SPACE  RESIDUAL RIDGE CONTOUR  SURGICAL MODIFICATION  GINGIVAL ARCHITECTURE PRESERVATION  CLASSIFICATION OF PONTICS  BIOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS  MECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS  ESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS  CROSS REFERENCES  REFERENCES
  • 3. • Esthetic appearance • Enabling adequate oral hygiene • Preventing tissue irritation 3 INTRODUCTION
  • 4. ACCORDING TO :  GPT-8 An artificial tooth on a fixed dental prosthesis that replaces a missing natural tooth, restores its function, and usually fills the space previously occupied by the clinical crown.  TYLMAN the suspended member of a fixed partial denture which replaces the lost natural tooth, restores function and occupies the space of the missing tooth. 4 DEFINITION . The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005;94(1):10-92. Tylman SMalone W. Tylman's Theory and practice of fixed prosthodontics. 8th ed. 1
  • 6. PRETREATMENT ASSESSMENT 6 I] PONTIC SPACE: One function of FPD is to prevent tilting or drifting of the adjacent teeth into the edentulous space. Drifting / tilting Reduced pontic space Difficulty in fabricating pontic
  • 7. ESTHETIC ZONE • Orthodontic alignment • Abutment modification with complete coverage retainers NONESTHETIC ZONE • Overly small pontics are unacceptable •Trap food •Difficult to clean •Careful diagnostic waxing to determine most appropriate treatment 7 81
  • 8. 2) RESIDUAL RIDGE CONTOUR 8 Features of Ideal Ridge Contour:  Smooth and regular surface of attached gingiva -Facilitate maintenance of plaque-free environment  Sufficient height and width - Mimic adjacent tooth contours- Appear to emerge from the ridge  Facially, free of frenal attachment
  • 9. LOSS OF RESIDUAL RIDGE CONTOUR:  Unesthetic open gingival embrasures “BLACK TRIANGLES”  Food impaction  Percolation of saliva during speech 9 81
  • 10. 10 SIEBERT’S CLASSIFICATION OF RESIDUAL RIDGE DEFORMITIES :  Class I defects  Faciolingual loss of tissue width with normal ridge height.  Class II defects  Loss of ridge height with normal ridge width.  Class III defects  a combination of loss in both dimensions.
  • 11. CLASSIFICATION 1. Depending on shape of surface contacting the ridge(Tylman)  Sanitary  Modified sanitary  Spheroidal  Saddle  Ridge lap  Modified ridgelap  Ovate 2.According To Rosenstiel Depending On Mucosal Contact  A. Mucosal contact Ridge Lap Modified Ridge Lap Ovate Conical  B. No Mucosal Contact Sanitary(hygenic) Modified Sanitary 3. Based on materials used • Metal and porcelain veneered • Metal and resin veneered • All metal pontic • All ceramic pontic
  • 12. 4. METHOD OF FABRICATION: • Custom made pontic 12
  • 13. Pontic selection depends primarily on esthetics and oral hygiene.  ANTERIOR REGION  POSTERIOR REGIONS 13 PONTIC SELECTION
  • 14. ANTERIOR PONTIC DESIGN – a correctly placed anterior pontic should have 1. All surfaces should be convex, smooth and properly finished. 2. Contact with the labial mucosa should be minimal (pin point) and pressure free (lap facing). 3. The lingual contour should be in harmony with adjacent teeth or pontics. 14 Pontic- residual ridge relationship: A research report. Stein RS, J Prosthet Dent 1966; 16: 251
  • 15. POSTERIOR PONTIC DESIGN – a correctly designed pontic should have 1. All surfaces should be convex, smooth and properly finished. 2. Contact with the buccal contiguous slopes should be minimal (pin point) and pressure free (modified ridge lap). 3. Occlusal table must be in functional harmony with the occlusion of all of the teeth 4. Buccal and lingual shunting mechanism should conform to those of the adjacent teeth. 5. The overall length of buccal surface should be equal to that of the adjacent abutments or pontics. 15 Pontic- residual ridge relationship: A research report. Stein RS, J Prosthet Dent 1966; 16: 251
  • 16. PRE-FABRICATED PONTIC FACINGS These are commercially available porcelain pontics which can be altered by the dentist and reglazed if necessary. These include: a) Trupontic – A horizontal tubular slot in the center of the lingual surface of the facing. b) Interchangeable facings/flat back facing– Manufactured with vertical slot running down the flat lingual surface, this facing is retained with a lug which engages the retention slot. 16
  • 17. c) Sanitary facing –flat occlusal surface and a slot on the proximal surface to fit into the metal projections made in the FDP d) Pin facing – A flat lingual facing with two horizontal pins for retention. 17
  • 18. e) Modified Pin Facing Facing is modified by adding porcelain to lingual gingival area of a pin facing f) Reverse pin facing – Porcelain denture teeth can be modified to be used as the bridge facing. Porcelain is added to the gingival end of the facing and multiple precision pin holes are drilled into the lingual surface 81 18
  • 19. g. Harmony facing – This facing is supplied with an uncontoured porcelain gingival surface and usually two retentive pins on the flat lingual side. h. Porcelain fused to metal facing Facing consists of a metal core over which porcelain is fused. i. Pontips: Convex gingival surface having pinpoint tissue contact and attached to the backing occlusally with retentive pins. 81 19
  • 20. SANITARY OR HYGIENIC PONTIC  Zero tissue contact  Occlusalgingival thickness should be atleast 3mm  Convex mesiodistally and faciolingually  Space beneath the pontic – 2mm ( Rosenstiel)  - 3 mm ( Tylman)  Adequate space for cleaning  Modified sanitary pontic:- gingival portion is shaped like a concave archway mesiodistally between the retainers and convex faciolingually.  Allows increased connector size while decreasing the stress concentrated in the pontic and connectors.  Recommended for mandibular posteriors FISH BELLY ARC-FIXED OR PEREL 81 20
  • 21. A modified sanitary pontic 21 Perel M L : J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28: 587
  • 22. SADDLE PONTIC OR RIDGE LAP PONTIC The saddle pontic has a concave fitting surface that overlaps the residual ridge buccolingually, simulating the contours and emergence profile of the missing tooth on both sides of the residual ridge. 22
  • 23.  Saddle or ridge lap designs should be avoided  The concave gingival surface of the pontic is not accessible to cleaning with dental floss>>>>plaque accumulation>>>>> tissue inflammation. 23
  • 24. The modified ridge lap pontic combines the best features of the hygienic and saddle pontic designs, combining esthetics with easy cleaning. 24 MODIFIED RIDGE LAP PONTIC • Overlaps the residual ridge on the facial (to achieve the appearance of a tooth emerging from the gingiva) • Remains clear of the ridge on the lingual side. 81
  • 25. Tissue contact should resemble a letter T whose vertical arm ends at the crest of the ridge. The ridge contact should be upto the midline of the edentulous ridge.  Most common pontic form used in areas of high visibility---  maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth and maxillary premolars and first molars 25
  • 26. CONICAL PONTIC • egg-shaped, bullet-shaped, or heart-shaped • Convex with only one point of contact at the center of the residual ridge. • recommended for the replacement of mandibular posterior teeth where esthetics is a lesser concern. 26
  • 27. The facial and lingual contours are dependent on the width of the residual ridge;  a knife-edged residual ridge necessitates flatter contours with a narrow tissue contact area.  This type of design may be unsuitable for broad residual ridges, because the emergence profile associated with the small tissue contact point may create areas of food entrapment 27 Rosenstiel S F et al : Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th edn
  • 28.  most esthetically appealing  Its convex tissue surface resides in a soft tissue depression or hollow in the residual ridge, which makes it appear that a tooth is literally emerging from the gingiva 28 OVATE PONTIC Rosenstiel S F et al : Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th edn
  • 29. Socket-preservation techniques should be performed at the time of extraction to create the tissue recess from which the ovate pontic form will emerge. For a preexisting residual ridge, soft tissue surgical augmentation is typically required. When an adequate volume of ridge tissue is established, a socket depression is sculpted into the ridge with surgical diamonds or electrosurgery. 29 Rosenstiel S F et al : Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th edn
  • 30. 30 Rosenstiel S F et al : Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th edn
  • 31. The biologic principles of pontic design pertain to the maintenance and preservation of the residual ridge, abutment and opposing teeth, and supporting tissue. Factors of specific influence are, 31 BIOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS
  • 32.  Pressure free contact between the pontic and the underlying tissue is indicated to prevented ulceration and inflammation of the soft tissues.  When a pontic rests on mucosa, some ulcerations may appear as a result of the normal movement of the mucosa in contact with the pontic.  Positive ridge pressure (hyperpressure) may be caused by excessive scraping of the ridge area on the definitive cast 32 RIDGE CONTACT
  • 33. Ridge irritation microbial plaque between the gingival surface of the pontic and the residual ridge tissue inflammation and calculus formation. 33 ORAL HYGIENE CONSIDERATIONS Normally, where tissue contact occurs, the gingival surface of a pontic is inaccessible to the bristles of a tooth brush. Therefore, excellent hygiene habits must be developed by the patient.
  • 34. 34 Devices such as proxy brushes, pipe cleaners, Oral-B Super Floss, and dental floss with a threader are highly recommended Gingival embrasures around the pontic should be wide enough to permit oral hygiene aids.
  • 35.  Should provide good esthetic results, biocompatibility, rigidity, and strength to withstand occlusal forces; and longevity.  Occlusal contacts should not fall on the junction between metal and porcelain during centric or eccentric tooth contacts, nor should a metal ceramic junction occur in contact with the residual ridge on the gingival surface of the pontic.  Investigations into the biocompatibility of materials used to fabricate pontics have centered on two factors : 1. The effect of the materials and 2. The effects of surface adherence. 35 PONTIC MATERIAL
  • 36.  Well-polished gold is smoother, less prone to corrosion, and less retentive of plaque than an unpolished or porous casting.  For easier plaque removal and biocompatibility, the tissue surface of the pontic should be made in glazed porcelain  However, ceramic tissue contact may be contraindicated in edentulous areas where there is minimal distance between the residual ridge and the occlusal table. 36
  • 37. HENRY P J ET AL: TISSUE CHANGES BENEATH FIXED PARTIAL DENTURES. J PROSTHET DENT 1966; 16: 937  placed 14 pontics on human gingival tissue.  gingival response to polished gold, Glazed porcelain or unglazed porcelain  there were general histologic changes in the tissue under all the materials tested.  noted that glazed porcelain was the most hygienic material used and it is superior in terms of esthetics and ease of cleaning. 37
  • 38.  Reducing the buccolingual width of the pontic by as much as 30%  12% increase in chewing efficiency can be expected from a one third reduction of pontic width.  Narrowing the occlusal table may actually impede the development of a harmonious and stable occlusal relationship  Difficulties in plaque control and improper cheek support.  Pontics with normal occlusal widths (at least on the occlusal third) are generally recommended.  One exception is if the residual alveolar ridge has collapsed buccolingually. Reducing pontic width may then be desired, thereby lessening the lingual contour and facilitating plaque control measures. 38 OCCLUSAL FORCES
  • 39. Mechanical problems may be caused by  improper choice of materials  poor frame work design  poor tooth preparation  poor occlusion.  Therefore, evaluating the likely forces on a pontic and designing accordingly are important. For example, a strong all metal pontic may be needed in high stress situations rather than a metal ceramic pontic which would be more susceptible to fracture. 39 MECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS
  • 40.  A well fabricated metal ceramic pontic is strong, easy to keep clean, and looks natural. 40 METAL CERAMIC PONTICS  The framework must provide a uniform veneer of porcelain (approximately 1.2 mm).  The metal surfaces to be veneered must be smooth and free of pits  Sharp angles on the veneering area should be rounded.  Occlusal centric contacts must be placed at least 1.5 mm away from the metal-porcelain junction
  • 41.  Resistance to abrasion is lower than enamel or porcelain,  no chemical bond existed between the resin and the metal framework, 41 RESIN-VENEERED PONTICS • Continuous dimensional change of the veneers often caused leakage at the metal-resin interface, with subsequent discoloration of the restoration. • New-generation indirect resins- High flexural strength, minimal polymerization shrinkage, and wear rates comparable with those of tooth enamel
  • 42.  Composite resins can be used in fixed partial dentures without a metal substructure.  A substructure matrix of impregnated glass or polymer fiber provides structural strength.  Excellent marginal adaptation and esthetics 42 FIBER-REINFORCED COMPOSITE RESIN PONTICS
  • 43.  No matter how well biologic and mechanical principles have been followed during fabrication, the patient will evaluate the result by how it looks, especially when anterior teeth have been replaced. 43 ESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS
  • 44.  The modified ridge-lap pontic is recommended for most anterior situations; it compensates for lost buccolingual width in the residual ridge by overlapping what remains  However, When appearance is of utmost concern, the ovate pontic, used in conjunction with alveolar preservation or soft tissue ridge augmentation 44
  • 45.  Ridge resorption will make a pontic look too long in the cervical region.  An abnormal labiolingual position or cervical contour, however, is not immediately obvious.  This fact can be used to produce a pontic of good appearance by recontouring the gingival half of the labial surface. 45 INCISOGINGIVAL LENGTH
  • 46.  In areas where tooth loss is accompanied by excessive loss of alveolar bone, the pontic is shaped to simulate a normal crown and root with emphasis on the cementoenamel junction. The root can be stained to simulate exposed dentin 46
  • 47. If augmentative measures are contraindicated or undesirable, small alveolar deficiencies and missing papillae can be reconstructed by restorative measures.  The exact shade of the gingiva has to be established with special gingival shade guides. The basal surface must demonstrate a convex shape similar to the ovate pontic designs for the dental floss to establish tight contact with all the surface areas. 47 GINGIVA-COLORED CERAMICS Daniel E , H Spiekermann: A review of esthetic pontic design options. Quintessence Int 2002;33:736-746
  • 48.  Separately fabricated ceramic gingival masks can be used to make subsequent adjustments in permanently placed restorations.  This method is particularly suitable for patients with a local alveolar ridge defect that has not been corrected by augmentation of the soft tissue. 48 ALL-CERAMIC GINGIVAL MASKS Daniel E , H Spiekermann: A review of esthetic pontic design options. Quintessence Int 2002;33:736-746
  • 50. 50 J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:205-210 SIMULATED TISSUE USING UNIQUE PONTIC DESIGN Kim.T.H.Yet al,
  • 51. 51
  • 52. 52 PURPOSE: To evaluate the load-bearing capacities of fiber- reinforced composite (FRC) fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with pontics of various materials and thicknesses. MATERIALS: 72 FDPs with frameworks made of continuous unidirectional glass fibers (everStick C&B) were fabricated. Three different pontic materials were used: glass ceramics, polymer denture teeth, and composite resin. The FDPs were divided into 3 categories based on the occlusal thicknesses of the pontics (2.5 mm, 3.2 mm, and 4.0 mm). Fiber-reinforced Composite Fixed Dental Prostheses with Various Pontics The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry2014Vol 16, No 2
  • 53. 53 CONCLUSION: • By increasing the occlusal thickness of the pontic, the load-bearing capacity of the FRC FDPs may be increased. • The highest load-bearing capacity was obtained with 4.0 mm thickness in the ceramic pontic. • However, with thinner pontics, polymer denture teeth and composite pontics resulted in higher load-bearing values
  • 54. 54 PREFABRICATED WAX PONTICS Advantages: * Without collar * Reduced occlusal depths * Reinforced approximal surfaces * Perfect scraping and modelling characteristics Primary use: Temporary Bridges Plastic to fabricate quick and economical temporary bridges. •Wear-resistant, vacuum- processed synthetic resin •Special lingual channel ensures pontic locks into the plastic
  • 55.  The pontic design is said to determine the success or failure of a bridge.  Designs that allow easy plaque control are especially important to a pontic’s long term success.  Minimizing tissue contact by maximizing the convexity of the pontic’s gingival surface is essential.  Special consideration is also needed to create a design that combines easy maintenance with natural appearance and adequate mechanical strength. 55 CONCLUSION The dentist should not attempt to duplicate nature exactly, but should attempt to support it by supplying a prosthesis based on sound biomechanical principles.
  • 56. 1. Rosenstiel S F et al : Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th edn Missouri, Mosby Inc, pg 513 2. Shillingburg H T et al : Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, ed 4, Chicago , Quintessence Publishing, pg 485 3. Tylman SMalone W. Tylman's Theory and practice of fixed prosthodontics. 8th ed. 4. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005;94(1):10-92. 5. Cavozos E : Tissue response to fixed partial denture pontics. J Prosthet Dent 1968; 20: 143 6. Daniel Edelhoff, H Spiekermann: A review of esthetic pontic design options. Quintessence Int 2002;33:736-746 7. Henry P J et al: Tissue changes beneath fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1966; 16: 937 56 REFERENCES
  • 57. 7. Perel M L : A modified sanitary pontic. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28: 587 8. Stein RS: Pontic- residual ridge relationship: A research report. J Prosthet Dent 1966; 16: 251 9. Korman R. Enhancing Esthetics with a Fixed Prosthesis Utilizing an Innovative Pontic Design and Periodontal Plastic Surgery. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2014;27(1):13-28. 10. Fiber-reinforced Composite Fixed Dental Prostheses with Various Pontics The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry2014Vol 16, No 2 11. Kim T, Cascione D, Knezevic A. Simulated tissue using a unique pontic design: A clinical report. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2009;102(4):205-210. 12. Purra AMushtaq M. Aesthetic replacement of an anterior tooth using the natural tooth as a pontic; an innovative technique. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2013;25(3):125-128. 57

Editor's Notes

  • #4: The restorations of edentulous areas with fixed partial dentures (FPDs) present a particular challenge for the clinician. Because of their ease of use and favorable long term results, conventional FPDs represent the most popular treatment measure today. In these restorations, the pontic must fulfill the complex roles of replacing the function of the lost tooth, achieving an In addition the pontic must meet certain structural requirements to ensure the mechanical stability of the restorations.
  • #8: When orthodontic repositioning is not possible, increasing the proximal contours of adjacent teeth may be better than making an FDP with undersized pontics If there is no functional or esthetic deficit, the space can be maintained without prosthodontic intervention.
  • #14: Pontic selection depends primarily on esthetics and oral hygiene. In the anterior region, where esthetics is a concern, the pontic should be well adapted to the tissue to make it appear that it emerges from the gingiva. Conversely, in the posterior regions (mandibular premolar and molar areas), esthetics can be compromised in the interest of designs that are more amenable to oral hygiene
  • #21: Hyperbolic paraboloid
  • #22: Morton L Perel in 1972 described a modified sanitary pontic which has a free archway design and is concave mesiodistally. Proximally the solder joints of the pontic are elongated. This addition increases the strength of what is considered to be the weakest part of any posterior fixed prosthesis.
  • #23: It is called ridge lap because it overlaps the facial lingual aspects of the ridge.
  • #25: There could be a faciolingual concavity on the facial side of the ridge, cleaned and well tolerated as long as the tissue contact is narrow M-D and F-L
  • #26: To enable optimal plaque control, the gingival surface must have no depression or hollow. Rather, it should be as convex as possible from mesial to distal (the greater the convexity, the easier the oral hygiene)
  • #27: easy for the patient to keep clean.
  • #28: a knife-edged residual ridge will necessitate flatter contours with a narrow tissue contact area. This type of design may be unsuitable for broad residual ridges, because the emergence profile associated with the small tissue contact point may create areas of food entrapment The sanitary or hygienic pontic is the design of choice in these clinical situations.
  • #29: before 1930 the root tipped pontic. Careful treatment planning is necessary for successful results
  • #30: The ovate pontic’s advantages include it’s pleasing appearance and it’s strength, when used successfully with ridge augmentation, it’s emergence from the ridge appears identical to that of a natural tooth. This type of pontic design, however, requires an adequate amount of soft tissue, which has to be sculpted accordingly.13 Various techniques are available for this purpose, ranging from controlled regeneration directly after the extraction of the tooth (immediate pontic technique) to plastic surgery (gingival grafting), which is accompanied by tissue conditioning in the course of the subsequent prosthodontic treatment.
  • #31: its recessed form is not susceptible to food impaction. The broad convex geometry is stronger than that of the modified ridge lap pontic Because the tissue surface of the pontic is convex in all dimensions, it is accessible to dental floss
  • #33: the pressure area should be identified with a disclosing medium (i.e, pressure indicating paste) and the pontic recontoured until tissue contact is entirely passive. This passive contact should occur exclusively on keratinized attached tissue.
  • #34: Unlike removable partial dentures, FPDs cannot be taken out of the mouth for daily cleaning. Patients must be taught efficient oral hygiene techniques, with particular emphasis on cleaning the gingival surface of the pontic. The shape of the gingival surface, its relation to the ridge, and the materials used in its fabrication will influence ultimate success.
  • #35: Unlike removable partial dentures, FPDs cannot be taken out of the mouth for daily cleaning. Patients must be taught efficient oral hygiene techniques, with particular emphasis on cleaning the gingival surface of the pontic.
  • #36: abricate the pontic should provide good esthetic results where needed; biocompatibility, rigidity, and strength to withstand occlusal forces; and longevity. FPDs should be made as rigid as possible, because any flexure during mastication or parafunction may cause pressure on the gingiva and cause fractures of the veneering material. Occlusal contacts should not fall on the junction between metal and porcelain during centric or eccentric tooth contracts, nor should a metal ceramic junction occur in contact with the residual ridge on the gingival surface of the pontic.
  • #37: Placing ceramic on the tissue side of the pontic may weaken the design of the metal substructure, particularly with porcelain occlusal surface
  • #39: Reducing the buccolingual width of the pontic by as much as 30% has been suggested as a way to lessen occlusal forces on, abutment teeth. forces are lessened only when chewing food of uniform consistency and that a mere 12% increase in chewing efficiency can be expected from a one third reduction of pontic width. In fact, narrowing the occlusal table may actually impede or even preclude development of a harmonious and stable occlusal relationship. Like a malposed tooth, it may cause difficulties in plaque control and may not provide proper cheek support. For these reasons, pontics with normal occlusal widths (at least on the occlusal third) are generally recommended. One exception is if the residual alveolar ridge has collapsed buccolingually. Reducing pontic width may then be desired, thereby lessening the lingual contour and facilitating plaque control measures. Potentially harmful forces are more likely to be encountered if an FPD is loaded by the accidental bitting on a hard object or by parafunctional activities like bruxism rather than by chewing foods of uniform consistency. These forces are not reduced by narrowing the occlusal table.
  • #40: These factors can lead to fracture of the prosthesis or displacement of the retainers. Long span posterior FPDs are particularly susceptible to mechanical problems. significant flexing from high occlusal forces and because The deflection of a fixed dental prosthesis is proportional to the cube of the length of its span
  • #41: However, mechanical failure can occur and often is attributable to inadequate frame work design. A reliable technique for ensuring uniform thickness of porcelain is to wax the fixed prosthesis to complete anatomic contour and then accurately cut back the wax to a predetermined depth The metal surfaces to be veneered must be smooth and free of pits. Surface irregularities will cause incomplete wetting by the porcelain slurry, leading to voids at the porcelain metal interface the reduce bond strength and increase the possibility of mechanical failure . Sharp angles on the veneering area should be rounded. They produce increased stress concentrations that can cause mechanical failure.
  • #42: Their resistance to abrasion was lower then enamel or porcelain, and noticeable wear occurred with normal tooth-brushing. Furthermore, the relatively high surface area/volume ratio of a thin resin veneer made dimensional change from water absorption and thermal fluctuations (thermo cycling) a problem. Because no chemical bond existed between the resin and the metal framework, the resin was retained by mechanical means (eg., undercuts). They are easy to manipulate and repair and do not require the high–melting range alloys needed for metal ceramic techniques.
  • #43: The physical properties of this system, combined with its excellent marginal adaptation and esthetics, make it a possible metal free alternative for FPDs, although long term clinical performance is not yet known.
  • #44: Many esthetic considerations that pertain to single crowns also apply to the pontic. Several problems unique to the pontic may be encountered when attempting to achieve a natural appearance.
  • #46: Obtaining a correctly sized pontic simply by duplicating the original tooth is not possible. The height of a tooth is immediately obvious when the patient smiles and shows the gingival margins. This fact can be used to produce a pontic of good appearance by recontouring the gingival half of the labial surface. The observer sees a normal tooth length but is unaware of the abnormal labial contour. The illusion is successful.
  • #47: However, such pontics then have considerably increased tissue contact and require scrupulous plaque control for long term success. Ridge augmentation procedures have been successful in correcting areas of limited resorption. When bone loss is severe, the esthetic result obtained with an RPD is often better than with an FPD.
  • #48: If augmentative measures are contraindicated or undesirable, small alveolar deficiencies and missing papillae can be reconstructed by restorative measures. First, the exact shade of the gingiva has to be established. This can be accomplished with special gingival shade guides that are supplied with the different commercially available pink veneering materials. The basal surface must demonstrate a convex shape similar to the ovate pontic designs for the dental floss to establish tight contact with all the surface areas.
  • #49: an impression is taken of the labial surface of tbe restoration using a customized tray and a medium-viscosity polyether materialThe masks are bonded to the existing restoration with a light-curing, low-viscosity resin composite, This solution, however, increases the risk of plaque accumulation. Because the material ages quickly, the prosthesis has to be replaced on a regular basis
  • #51: A 52-year-old woman. The areas of the pencil marks represented the region where the patient would have the deepest point of tissue adaptation and was scored to a depth of 1 mm and trim the alveolar crest to 0.5 mm. the pontic was convex in the buccal and lingual regions and concave in the middle of the pontic
  • #52: Slowly screwing prosthesis into place for 15 minutes allows tissue to contour after complete seating. 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3, 6, and 10 months to evaluate the the tissue beneath the pontic. An oral hygiene evaluation, especially of the tissue under the pontics, was performed at each visit. The provisional implant fixed partial denture was worn for 10 months before the definitive prosthesis was inserted.
  • #56: Based on classic clinical studies, a number of authors have advocated the use of modified ridge lap pontics with a well polished and smooth, convex surface that results in pressure free or mild contact with the alveolar ridge over a very small area for a better preservation of the soft tissue health. However, the modified ridge lap pontic design has certain limitations, depending on the pattern of alveolar ridge resorption, and cannot always be used without compromising esthetics and functions. Because the aforementioned factors are decisive in restoring anterior teeth, new alternatives in pontic design were developed, giving the illusion that the replaced tooth emerges from the gingiva like a natural tooth. This ovate pontic design requires the preparation of a suitable recipient site, which can be achieved by the application of modern ridge preservation techniques, including an atraumatic extraction and the direct support of the extraction socket by the use of the immediate pontic technique. Metal ceramic pontic fabrication is straightforward and practical. However, it requires careful execution for maximum strength, appearance, and effective plaque control. Alternatively procedures may some times be helpful, particularly when gold alloys are used for the retainers. Resin veneered pontics should be restricted to use as longer term provisional restorations, and all metal pontics may be the restoration of choice in non-esthetics situations, particularly where forces are high. Thus the design of the pontic is probably the most important factor in determining the success of the restoration of the patient. If the patient is unable to clean effectively and maintain the pontic the restoration will be unsuccessful.