POST AND CORE
Dr. Alvin George
3rd Year
Department of
Conservative Dentistry and
Endodontics
 Introduction
 Definition
 Indications
 Contraindications
 History
 Classification
 Types of posts
 Ferrule
 Post space preparation
 Post fabrication
 Try in
 Cementation
 Principles of core build up
 Cause of failure
 Conclusion
 References
RESTORATIONS OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH ARE
DESIGNED TO:
1. Protect the remaining tooth from fracture,
2. Prevent reinfection of the root canal system, and,
3. Replace the missing tooth structure.
INTRODUCTION :
Endodontics, Ingle
 Restorations that encompass the cusps of endodontically treated posterior teeth
have been found to increase the clinical longevity of these teeth. Therefore,
crowns should be placed on endodontically treated posterior teeth that have
occlusal intercuspation with opposing teeth of the nature that places expansive
forces on the cusps.
 Since crowns do not enhance the clinical success of anterior endodontically
treated teeth, their use on relatively sound teeth should be limited to
situations where esthetic and functional requirements cannot be
adequately achieved by other more conservative restorations
DEFINITIONS :
 Dowel (Post): The dowel is a metal post or other rigid restorative material
placed in the radicular portion of a non vital tooth. A dowel, usually made of
metal, is fitted in to a prepared canal of a natural tooth. When combined with
an artificial crown or core, it provides retention and resistance for the
restoration. (Glossary of Prosthodontics)
 Core: Refers to properly shaped and well substructure, which replaces
missing coronal structure and retains the final restoration. The core is
designed to resemble or become the crown preparation or crown itself.
(Glossary of Prosthodontics)
INDICATIONS :
 Where the natural crown of root-filled teeth either has been lost or is
extensively damaged.
 Where the root-filled tooth is to be used as bridge abutment.
 Where a change in axial position greater than 1mm is required.
 In a crowned anterior endodontically involved tooth, to reinforce the crown
covered tooth at cervical area susceptible to fracture.
CONTRAINDICATIONS :
 Severe curvature of the root-eg: Dilacerations of the root.
 Persistent periapical lesion
 Poor periodontal health
 Poor crown to root ratio
 Weak / fragile roots
 Teeth with heavy occlusal contacts
 Patients with unusual and occupational habits
 Economic factors
 Inadequate skill.
HISTORY :
 In 1728, Pierre Fauchard described the use of “TENONS” which were metal
posts screwed into the roots of teeth to retain the prosthesis
 1745 – Claude Mouton published his design of a gold crown with a gold post
that was to be inserted into the root.
 1830-1870 –Wood replaced metal as the material of choice for posts.
 1839 Harris proposed that gold and platinum were superior to brass, silver
and copper which tended to corrode.
 G.V. Black 1869 developed porcelain fused to metal crown held in by a screw
inserted into a canal filled with gold foil
 “Pivot crown” – a wooden post fitted to an artificial crown and to root canal.
 In 1966 prefabricated posts and composite resin cores came into use.
 In1990 Duret et al. described a non-metallic material for the fabrication of
posts based on the carbon-fibre reinforcement principle.
AN IDEAL POST SYSTEM ACCORDING TO WAGNILD ET AL (2002)
SHOULD HAVE THE FOLLOWING FEATURES :
 Provide maximal retentiveness to the core.
 Physical properties compatible to core
 Maximum retention with minimum removal of dentin
 Even distribution of functional stresses along root surfaces
 Esthetic compatibility
 Minimal stress during placement and cementation
 Resistance to displacement.
 Easy retrievability
 Ease of use
 Reasonable cost
Grossman
ACCORDING TO COHEN :
Posts should provide as many of the following clinical features as possible:
 Maximal protection of the root from fracture
 Maximal retention within the root and retrievability
 Maximal retention of the core and crown
 Maximal protection of the crown margin seal from coronal leakage
 Pleasing esthetics, when indicated
 High radiographic visibility
 Biocompatibility
ACCORDING TO WEINE
1. Custom-cast Posts
2. Prefabricated Posts
 Tapered, smooth sided post systems
 Parallel-sided, serrated and vented posts
 Tapered, self-threading post systems
 Parallel- sided, threaded post systems
 Parallel-sided, threaded, split-shank post systems
CLASSIFICATION OF POSTS :
ACCORDING TO INGLE
1. Custom-cast Posts
2. Prefabricated Posts
 Tapered, smooth-sided posts
 Parallel-sided posts
 Tapered, self-threading screws
 Parallel-sided, threaded posts
 Parallel-sided, tapered apical end posts
ACCORDING TO ROBBINS
1. Metallic Posts
 Custom-cast Posts
 Prefabricated Posts
i. Passive Tapered Posts
ii. Passive Parallel Posts
iii. Active Posts
2. Non-metallic Posts
 Carbon Fiber Posts
 Tooth Colored Posts
ACCORDING TO SCHWARTZ
1. Active versus Passive Posts
2. Parallel versus Tapered Posts
3. Prefabricated versus custom made
4. According to material composition:
i. Metal posts
ii. Ceramic and Zirconium Posts
iii. Fiber Posts
a. Carbon Fibre posts
b. Quartz fibre
c. Glass fibre
d. Silicon fibre
ACCORDING TO ROSENSTEIL
1. Tapered, smooth-sided posts
2. Tapered, serrated posts
3. Tapered, threaded posts
4. Parallel, smooth-sided posts
5. Parallel, serrated posts
6. Parallel, threaded posts
PostNdCore classification types n new trends
Singh, Chandra, Pandit, A New Classification of Post and Core; Indian Journal Of Restorative Dentistry,Sept-
Dec2015;4(3):56- 58.
A. CLASSIFICATION OF CAST POST
 According to type of alloy
 Gold alloy
 Chrome-Cobalt alloy
 Nickel-Chromium alloy
 According to number of posts:
 Single Post
 Multiple Post
One Piece Post
Two Piece Post
• Two piece cast post
• Combination of cast post
B. CLASSIFICATION OF PREFABRICATED POST
 According to Taper
 Parallel
 Tapered
 Parallel Tapered
 According to surface character
 Smooth
 Serrated
 Self threading
 According to fit
 Active
 Pasive
Singh, Chandra, Pandit, A New Classification of Post and Core; Indian Journal Of Restorative Dentistry,Sept-Dec2015;4(3):56- 58.
 According to material
 Metallic
 Titanium
 Stainless steel
 Brass
 Non-metallic
 Non esthetic
• Carbon fibre post
 Esthetic
• Polyethelene Fibre
• Glass fibre
• Quartz
• Ceramic
Singh, Chandra, Pandit, A New Classification of Post and Core; Indian Journal Of Restorative Dentistry,Sept-Dec2015;4(3):56- 58.
 According to light transmission
 Light transmitting
 Non-Light transmitting
 According to Vent
 With Vent
 Without Vent
 According to Monoblock formation
 Monobloc formation
 No Monobloc formation
Singh, Chandra, Pandit, A New Classification of Post and Core; Indian Journal Of Restorative Dentistry,Sept-Dec2015;4(3):56-
58.
CUSTOM CAST POSTS
Indications:
1. When the remaining coronal tooth
structure supporting an artificial crown
is minimal so that it can’t resist
torsional forces.
2. When multiple cores are being
placed in the same arch and small
teeth such as mandibular incisors,
3. When there is minimal coronal
tooth structure available for
antirotation features or bonding.
TYPES OF POSTS
 Advantages:
 It offers the advantages of easy retrievability of post,
 greater strength
 excellent core retention.
 Better adaptation in cases of elliptical and extremely tapered
canals
 Disadvantages:
 Esthetics, as the metal shows through the newer all ceramic
restorations.
 Increased susceptibility to root fracture
 Two visit procedure
 Additional lab fee.
PREFAABRICATED POSTS
 Prefabricated metallic posts are frequently used for the fabrication of a direct
foundation restoration. These posts are classified several ways, including by
alloy composition, retention mode, and shape
 Materials used to fabricate metallic posts include gold alloys, stainless
steel, or titanium alloys
ADVANTAGES OF PRE-FABRICATED POST-CORE SYSTEMS OVER
CAST POST
 They are simple to use.
 Require less chair side time.
 Can be completed in one appointment.
 Are easy to temporize.
MAJOR DISADVANTAGES OF PRE-FABRICATED POST-CORE
SYSTEMS
 The root is designed to accept the post rather than the post being designed
to fit the root.
 Their application is limited when considerable coronal tooth
structure is lost.
 Chemical reactions are possible when the post and core materials are made
of dissimilar metals.
 Attachments for removable prostheses cannot be applied, unless a
separate casting is fabricated to place over it.
ADVANTAGES OF CAST POST OVER PRE- FABRICATED POST-
 They are custom fit to the root configuration.
 Are adaptable to large irregularly shaped canals and orifices.
 Can be adapted to be used with pre fabricated plastic patterns.
DISADVANTAGES OF CAST-POST
 Expensive
 Requires two or more appointments.
 Temporization between appointments is more difficult.
 Risk of casting inaccuracies
 May require the removal of additional coronal tooth structure
STAINLESS STEEL POSTS
 Have been used for a long time in prefabricated posts.
 Contains nickel, and nickel sensitivity is a concern, especially
among female patients.
 A recent study indicates that the flexural strength of stainless steel posts is
about 1430 MPa and that flexural modulus approximates 110 GPA
 Stainless steel and brass have problems with corrosion.
METALLIC POSTS
TITANIUM POSTS
 less rigid (66 GPa)
 flexural strength (1280 MPa) similar to
stainless steel.
 least corrosive
 most biocompatible
 low fracture strength and tend to break more easily
compared with stainless steel posts during removal in
retreatment cases.
 titanium alloys used in posts have a density similar to
that of gutta-percha when seen on radiographs, which
makes them more difficult to detect
FIBRE POST
 A fiber post consists of
reinforcing fibers embedded in
a resin polymerized matrix.
 Monomers used to form the
resin matrix are typically
bifunctional methacrylates (Bis-
GMA, UDMA, TEGDMA), but
epoxies have also been used.
NON-METALLIC POSTS
 Common fibers in today’s fiber posts are made of carbon, glass,
silica, or quartz
 The fibers are 7 to 10 micrometers in diameter and are available in a number of
different configurations, including braided, woven and longitudinal.
 The lower flexural modulus of fiber-reinforced posts (between 1 and 4 × 106 psi),
measures closer to that of dentin (≈ 2 × 106 psi) and can decrease the incidence of root
fracture.
 Current fiber posts are radiopaque and may also conduct the light for
polymerization of resin-based luting cements.
 A light- transmitting post results in better polymerization of resin composites in
the apical area.
 Bonding fiber posts to root canal dentin can improve the distribution of forces
applied along the root, thereby decreasing the risk of root fracture and
contributing to the reinforcement of the remaining tooth structure.
CARBON FIBRE POST
 The carbon fibre prefabricated
post, introduced in the early
1990s, is comprised of
longitudinally aligned carbon
fibres embedded in an epoxy resin
matrix (approx 36%).
 This type of post has no
radiopacity and is black in colour
– both significant clinical
disadvantages.
 In a prospective clinical trial more failures were seen in the carbon-fibre-posted teeth
than those with conventional prefabricated posts.
 Also, a longer term follow up of the 236 teeth in the favourable Frederiscksson
report concluded that the carbon-fibre restored teeth had shorter survival times
than those previously documented for cast posts
ZIRCONIA POSTS
 Zirconia posts are composed of zirconium
dioxide (ZrO2) partially stabilized with
yttrium oxide and exhibit a high flexural
strength.
 Zirconia posts are
 esthetic,
 partially adhesive,
 very rigid,
 but also brittle.
 Zirconia posts cannot be etched, and available literature suggests that
bonding resins to these materials is less predictable and requires sub-
stantially different bonding methods than conventional ceramics. When a
composite core is built on a zirconia post, core retention may also be a
problem
 Other reports indicate that the rigidity of zirconia posts negatively affects
the quality of the interface between the resin core material and dentin
when subjected to fatigue testing
ACTIVE POSTS
 Active posts derive their primary retentiondirectly from the root
dentin by the use of threads. Most active posts are threaded and are
intended to be screwed into the walls of the root canal.
 A major concern about threaded posts has been the potential for vertical root
fracture during placement. As the post is screwed into place, it introduces
great stresses within the root, causing a wedging effect. Therefore, it is
generally accepted that the use of threaded posts should be avoided.
 Active posts are more retentive than passive posts, and can be used safely,
only in substantial roots with maximum remaining dentin.
 Their use should be limited to short roots in which maximum retention is
needed.
PASSIVE POSTS
 Passive posts are passively placed in close contact to the dentin walls, and
their retention primarily relies on the luting cement used for cementation.
PARALLEL AND TAPERED POSTS
 A parallel post is more retentive than a tapered post but also requires
removal of more root dentin during the preparation of the post space
 The lower retention obtained with the tapered-end post is attributed to the
lack of parallelism in the apical portions
 Although tapered post shape requires less dentine removal and is more
consistent with root anatomy, a growing body of evidence suggests that
tapered, unbonded posts exert a wedge effect that puts the root at risk of
fracture and predisposes to loss of retention
PRETREATMENT EVALUATION AND TREATMENT
STRATEGY
 ENDODONTIC,
 PERIODONTAL
 BIOMECHANICAL
 ANATOMIC EVALUATIONS
ENDODONTIC EVALUATION
 Endodontic retreatment is indicated for
teeth showing radio- graphic signs of
apical periodontitis or clinical symptoms
of inflammation.
 Canals obturated with a silver cone or other
inappropriate filling material should be
endodontically retreated before starting any
restorative therapy.
PERIODONTAL EVALUATION
The following conditions are to be considered as critical for treatment
success:
 Healthy gingival tissue
 Normal bone architecture and attachment levels to favor periodontal health
 Maintenance of biologic width and ferrule effect before and after
endodontic and restorativephases
BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION
All previous events, from initial decay or trauma to final root canal therapy, influence
the biomechanical status of the tooth and the selection of restorative materials and
procedures
Important clinical factors include the following:
 The amount and quality of remaining tooth structure
 The anatomic position of the tooth
 The occlusal forces on the tooth
 The restorative requirements of the tooth
 Teeth with minimal remaining tooth structure are at increased risk for the following
clinical complications
 Root fracture
 Coronal-apical leakage
 Recurrent caries
 Dislodgment or loss of the core/prosthesis
 Periodontal injury from biologic width invasion
ANATOMIC EVALUATION
 Root anatomy can also have significant influence over post placement and
selection. Root curvature, furcations, developmental depressions, and root
concavities observed at the external surface of the root are all likely to be
reproduced inside the root canal. Within the same root, the shape of the canal
will vary between the cervical level and the apical foramen
 The tooth is also weakened if root dentin is sacrificed to place a larger-
diameter post. Following normal and appropriate endodontic
instrumentation, teeth can possess less than 1 mm of dentin, indicating that
there should be no further root preparation for the post.
BIOMECHANICAL PRINCIPLES
 C O N S E RVATI O N O F TO OTH STR U CTU R E
 R ETE NTI O N FO R M
 R E S I STAN C E FO R M
I. CONSERVATION OF TOOTH STRUCTURE
 Remove minimal structure from the canal
 Excessive enlargement can weaken or perforate the tooth
 Thickness of remaining dentin - fracture resistance form
 Helfer AR et al 1972. stated that teeth cemented with thicker posts (1.8 mm)
fractured more easily than those with a thinner (1.3 mm) one.
 Photo elastic studies also have show that internal stresses are
reduced with thinner posts.
1. PREPARATION OF THE CANAL
 Most roots have proximal concavities
 Felton DA 1991, said that most root fractures originate from these
concavities because the remaining dentin thickness is minimal. Root canal
should be enlarged only enough to enable the post to fit accurately yet
passively while insuring strength and retention.
2. PREPARATION OF CORONAL TISSUE :
 As much of the coronal tooth structure should be conserved as possible
because this helps reduce stress concentration at the gingival margin.
 Milton P and Stein R S 1992 stated that if more than 2 mm of coronal tooth
structure remains, the post design probably has a limited role in the fracture
resistance of restored tooth. A key element of tooth preparation when using a
dowel and core is the incorporation of a ferrule
J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:515-19.
FERRULE
FERRUM – Iron
VIRIOLA – Bracelet
 A ferrule is a metal ring or cap used to strengthen the end of a stick or tube.
A dental ferrule is an encircling band of cast metal around the coronal surface of the
tooth. (Brown 1993)
 A Subgingival collar or apron of gold which extends as far as possible beyond the
gingival seat of the core and completely surrounds the perimeter of the cervical
part of the tooth. It is an extension of the restored crown which, by its hugging
action, prevents shattering of the root.(Rosen 1961)
 The ferrule effect be defined as ‘‘a 360 metal collar of the crown surrounding the
parallel walls of the dentine extending coronal to the shoulder of the
preparation”. (Sorensen & Engelman)
 It is often confused with the remaining amount of sound dentine above the
finish line.
 A ferrule, in respect to teeth, is a band that encircles the external dimension of
residual tooth structure. A 2 mm height of tooth structure should be available to
allow for a ferrule effect.
Galen WW, Mueller KI: Restoration of the Endodontically Treated Tooth. In Cohen, S. Burns, RC, editors: Pathways of the Pulp,
10th Edition
 Barkhordar et al. (1989) found that a metal collar signicantly increased
resistance to root fracture. They also observed di¡erent fracture patterns in the
collared teeth compared to those without collars. The collared group
predominantly underwent patterns of horizontal fracture whereas the teeth
without collars mainly exhibited patterns of vertical fracture (splitting).
Stankiewicz & Wilson.The ferrule effect International Endodontic Journal, 35, 575-581, 2002
 CROWN FERRULE: Ferrule created by the overlying crown
engaging tooth structure.
 CORE FERRULE: Ferrule that are part of a cast metal.
FACTORS AFFECTING FERRULE EFFECT
 Ferrule Height
 Ferrule Width
 Number of walls and ferrule location
 Type of tooth and extent of lateral load
FERRULE HEIGHT
 Greater the height of remaining tooth structure better the fracture
resistance.
 Ferrule height of 1.5 to 2 mm of vertical tooth structure would be
the most beneficial.a
 The crown should encompass at least 2 mm past the tooth core connection to
achieve the most protective ferrule effect.
Trushkowsky RD:restoration of endodontically treated teeth:criteria and technique consideratioas. Quintes
sence int 2014;45:557–67
FERRULE WIDTH
 Esthetic restorations often require fairly
aggressive preparations at the gingival
margin and sometimes buccal defects
such as abfraction may compromise the
buccal dentin wall.
 It has been accepted that the walls are
considered too thin if they are less than
1 mm in thickness, and would negate
the ferrule effect.
NUMBER OF WALLS AND FERRULE LOCATION
 A circumferential ferrule would be optimal but caries may affect the
interproximal areas and abrasion or erosion the buccal walls.
 A crown preparation will further reduce the wall thickness and only a
partial ferrule will remain.
 Al-Wahadni and Gutteridge found having a 3- mm ferrule on the buccal
aspect was better than having no ferrule at all
TYPE OF TOOTH AND EXTENT OF LATERAL LOAD
 Anterior teeth are loaded non-axially
 Posterior teeth are loaded occluso-gingivally.
 Anterior teeth with a deep overbite and parafunction are at a higher risk of
failure.
 Teeth that are in group function with long maxillary buccal cusps produce
higher lateral forces than if there was canine guidance.
ADVANTAGES OF FERRULE
1. Promoting hugging action,
2. Preventing the shattering of the root,
3. Antirotational effect
4. Reducing the wedging effect of a tapered dowel, and
5. Resisting functional lever forces and the lateral forces exerted during
dowel insertion
Rosen H: Operative procedures on mutilated endodontically treated eeth. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:973-986.
Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ: Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529-536
PostNdCore classification types n new trends
Ferrule can be created in a no ferrule case
1.Crown lengthening
2.Forced eruption
II. RETENTION FORM
Post retention is defined as the ability of a post to resist vertical
dislodging forces
1. Preparation Geometry
2. Post Configuration
3. Post length and diameter
4. Surface Texture
5. Luting Agent
6. Number of posts
PREPARATION GEOMETRY
 Circular cross section canals should be prepared with parallel walls or mimum
taper,allowing use of parallel-prefabricated post.
 Elliptical or excessively flared canals cannot be prepared to give parallel
walls and require custom cast posts or tapered prefabricated posts.
POST CONFIGURATION
 Custom made posts are more retentive then the prefabricated as they
are designed according.
 Laboratory testing has confirmed that –
 Parallel sided posts are more retentive than tapered posts. –
 Threaded posts are the more retentive than smooth posts.
J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:139-44.
POST LENGTH
 Retention increases with increase
in post length.
 One study shows that retention increases
by more than 97% when post length equals
or is greater than crown length.
 However, this length must be well within
constraints of tooth length, canal
morphology and root diameter in the
apical area.
 When average root length is encountered,
post length is dictated by retaining 5 mm
of apical gutta-percha and extending the
post down to the gutta-percha
 Whenever possible, posts should
extend atleast 4mm apical to the
bone crest to decrease dentin
stress.
 Molar posts should not be extended
more than 7 mm into the root canal
apical to the base of the pulp
chamber
GUIDELINES FOR POST LENGTH
 The post length should equal the incisocervical or occlusocervical dimension
of the crown
 The post should be longer than the crown.
 The post should be one and one third of the crown length
 The post should be one half of the root length
 The post should be two thirds of the root length
 The post should be four fifths of the root length
 The post should be as long as possible without disturbing the apical seal
 The post preparation for molars should be limited to a depth of 7mm
apical to the canal orifice
 Perel and Muroff (1972) recommended that the post be at least half the length of
root in bone.
 To minimize stress in the dentin and in the post, the post should extend more
than 4mm apical to the bone crest to decrease dentin stress
POSTWIDTH
 Whether posts are cemented or threaded, diameter makes little
difference in retentive ability.
 Instead, if the post diameter is increased, the amount of remaining dentin
between the post and the external surface of the root is decreased.
 This diminished remaining dentin becomes an area of high stress
concentration under load and, consequently, an area with a high potential for
failure.
 The smallest diameter post that is practical should be used for a given
clinical situation.
 Deusch et al determined that there was a six fold increase in the potential for
root fracture with every millimeter the tooth’s diameter was decreased.
 There are three schools of thoughts regarding the post diameter –
 Conservationist (Advocated by Mattison) : The post should be of the
narrowest diameter that allows its fabrication for desired length
 Preservationist (Advocated by Halle): – The entire surface of the
dowel was surrounded by atleast 1mm of sound dentin
 Proportionist (Advocated by Stern and Hirschfeld) : The apical
diameter of the post space should be equal to one third the narrowest
dimension of the root diameter at the terminus of root space
PostNdCore classification types n new trends
POST SPACE WIDTH ACCORDING TO
SHILLINBURG
SURFACE ROUGHNESS
 D’Arcangelo C et al :has shown that by acid etching the surface of the fiber
posts with hydrofluoric acid and sand blasting through SEM analysis that
presence of microretentive morphological changes, which certainly increase
post-retentive properties without decreasing their flexural properties.
 Monticelli F has shown the adverse effects of using Hydrofluoric acid for
etching the fiber posts as it can cause the extensive damage to the fiber posts
by giving rise to the micro-cracks and longitudinal fractures of the fiber layers.
 In order to enhance retention, it is advised that before the cementation of a
post, the canal space should be cleaned by application of a chelating agent to
remove the smear layer. When smear layer is removed, it allows the cement to
enter the dentinal tubules and provide micromechanical retention.
 Commonly used agents for post space irrigation include EDTA or 5-5.25%
NaOCl that denatures protein and removes collagen, and Acids (such as 50%
citric acid and 37% phosphoric acid) that remove the smear layer and
demineralise dentin as stated by Keles A et al.
LUTING AGENT
 Any of the current luting cements can be successfully used with a post if
the proper principles are followed.
 The most commonly used luting agents are: zinc phosphate, resin
cement, glass-ionomer and resin- modified glass ionomer.
 However, Resin-modified glass ionomer cements should be avoided as they
expand on water absorption and may cause root fracture.
 Generally, in the past, zinc phosphate was the cement of choice, but, recent
trend has been toward resin cements because they:
 – Increase retention.
 – Tend to leak less than other cements.
NUMBER OF POSTS
 It is possible to place more than one post in teeth with multiple roots.
 Additional posts may be used, where feasible, to increase retention and
retain core material, especially in severely broken down teeth
III. RESISTANCE FORM
 Resistance is defined as the ability of the post and tooth to withstand
lateral and rotational forces.
 One of the functions of a post and core restoration is to improve resistance to
laterally directed forces by distributing them over as large an area as possible.
 However, excessive preparation of the root weakens it and increases the
probability of failure.
 The post design should distribute stresses as evenly as possible.
 The influence of post design on stress distribution has been tested using.
Photo elastic materials.
Finite elements analysis
Strain gauges and
 The greatest stress concentrations are found at the shoulder, particularly
interproximally, and at the apex.
 Dentin should be conserved in these areas
 Stress is reduced as post length increases. But excessive length reduces the
thickness of dentin at the apical area and hence the fracture resistance
decreases.
 Parallel-sided posts distribute stresses more evenly than tapered posts, which
can have a wedging effect. However, parallel posts generate high stresses at
the apex.
 Sharp angles should be avoided as they produce high stresses during loading.
 High stress can be generated during insertions of smooth parallel-sided posts
that have no vent for escape of cements. Therefore, in these posts, longitudinal
grooves (vents) running along the length of the post should be provided to
allow escape of cement thus reducing the hydrostatic pressure and generation
of stress.
 Tapered posts are self-venting and generally do not require vents.
 Threaded posts can produce high stresses during insertion and loading, but
they have been shown to distribute stress evenly if the posts are backed off a
half- turn.
ROTATIONAL RESISTANCE
 In molars it’s commonly achieved by the square shape of the tooth; however
premolars and anterior teeth are commonly more round.
 It is important that a post with a circular cross section not rotate during
function.
 Where sufficient coronal tooth structure remains, this should not present a
problem because the axial wall then prevents rotation.
 When coronal dentin has been completely lost, a small groove placed in the
canal can serve as an anti-rotational element.
 The groove is normally placed where the root is bulkiest, usually on the
lingual aspect.
 Many cast posts resist rotational forces because they are
oblong in cross section. However, the cast post for round
canals, such as the maxillary incisor requires locking
notches or keyways incorporated into the canal to resist
rotational movement (Gutmann JL et al; 1977, and
Dewhirst RB et al; 1969).
 Ferrule is an important feature in the resistance form
 Both laboratory and clinical data fail to provide definitive support for
the concept that posts strengthen endodontically treated teeth.
Therefore, the purpose of a post is to provide retention for a core.
Endodontics, Ingle
With Pulpless Teeth, Do Posts Improve Long-Term Clinical
Prognosis or Enhance Strength?
Endodontics, Ingle
What Are the Most Common Types of Post and Core Failures?
 Loss of retention and tooth fracture are the two most common causes of
post and core failure.
 Posts and cores had an average clinical failure rate of 9% (7 to 14%
range) when the data from 10 studies were combined (average study
length of 8 years).
Endodontics, Ingle
What Is the Clinical Failure Rate of Posts and Cores?
Endodontics, Ingle
Which Post Design Produces the Greatest Retention?
 Tapered posts are the least retentive and threaded posts the most
retentive in laboratory studies
 Most of the clinical data support the laboratory findings.
Endodontics, Ingle
Is There a Relationship Between Post Form and the
Potential for Root Fracture?
 When evaluating the combined data from multiple clinical studies,
threaded posts generally produced the highest root fracture
incidence (7%) compared with tapered cemented posts (2%) and
parallel cemented posts (1%).
Endodontics, Ingle
Endodontics, Ingle
What Is the Proper Length for a Post?
 Make the post approximately two- third of the length of the root
when treating long-rooted teeth.
 When average root length is encountered, post length is dictated
by retaining 5 mm of apical gutta- percha and extending the post to
the gutta-percha
 Whenever possible,posts should extend atleast 4mm apical to the
bone crest to decrease dentin stress.
 Molar posts should not be extended more than 7 mm into the root
canal apical to the base of the pulp chamber
Endodontics, Ingle
Endodontics, Ingle
What Is the Proper Length for a Post?
 Since there is greater leakage when only 2 to 3 mm of gutta-
percha is present, 4 to 5 mm should be retained apically to ensure
an adequate seal.
Endodontics, Ingle
Does Post Diameter Affect Retention and the Potential
for Tooth Fracture?
 Laboratory studies relating retention to post diameter have
produced mixed results, whereas a more definitive relationship has
been established between root fracture and large-diameter posts
Endodontics, Ingle
What Is the Relationship Between Post Diameter and
the Potential for Root Perforations?
 Safe instrument diameters to use are 0.6 to 0.7 mm for small teeth
such as mandibular incisors and 1 to 1.2 mm for large-diameter
roots such as the maxillary central incisors. Molar posts longer
than 7 mm have an increased chance of perforations and therefore
should be avoided even when using instruments of an appropriate
diameter.
Endodontics, Ingle
Endodontics, Ingle
Can Gutta- Percha Be Removed Immediately after
Endodontic Treatment and a Post Space Prepared?
 Adequately condensed gutta- percha can be safely removed
immediately after endodontic treatment.
Endodontics, Ingle
 Both rotary instruments and hot hand instruments can be safely used
to remove adequately condensed gutta-percha when 5 mm is
retained apically.
What Instruments Remove Gutta-Percha Without
Disturbing the Apical Seal?
 Following endodontic treatment, post space preparation should be
performed and a post definitively cemented as soon as possible: the
same day for a prefabricated post, and as soon as possible for a cus-
tom-fabricated post and core. The prepared tooth should then be
restored with a well-fitting provisional restoration (good marginal
seal and occlusion) fol- lowed by cementation of the definitive crown
in as short a time as possible.
Endodontics, Ingle
Does the Use of a Cervical Ferrule that Engages Tooth
Structure Help Prevent Tooth Fracture?
Endodontics, Ingle
 Differences of opinion exist regarding the effectiveness of ferrules in
preventing tooth fracture. Ferrules have been tested when they are
part of the core and also when the ferrule is created by the overlying
crown engaging tooth structure. Most of the data indicate that a
ferrule created by the crown encompassing tooth structure is more
effective than a ferrule that is part of the post and core
Endodontics, Ingle
Does the Use of a Cervical Ferrule that Engages Tooth
Structure Help Prevent Tooth Fracture?
Endodontics, Ingle
PostNdCore classification types n new trends
 Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Fibre (UHMWPE)
is one of the most versatile materials that have been
introduced in dentistry.
 it is highly aesthetic compared to cast metal as it is tooth
colored secondly, it has high flexibility, is thin as well as strong
and is being used to strengthen dental composite in large
restorations.
 The elastic modulus of these posts is similar to that of dentin
and can be bonded to both dentin and core material which
improves the distribution of forces along tooth roots which
further contributes to the tooth-restoration reinforcement.
 Other advantages include ease of manipulation and reduction
in microleakage due to better bonding capacity.
 cyclic loading on loss of retention was significantly lesser in
custom fabricated Ribbond posts than compared to metal and
glass fibre posts
 Very strong and virtually unbreakable
 Elasticity similar to dentin
 Dissipates occlusal stress
 Non-corrosive and biocompatible
 Multi-axially arranged fibers
 Resistant to bending and torsion forces
 The use of biological posts made from natural, extracted teeth represents a feasible
option for strengthening root canals, thus presenting the potential advantages such
as:
(1) Does not promote undue stress on dentinal walls
(2) preserves the internal dentin walls of the root canal
(3) presents total biocompatibility and adapts to conduct configuration, favoring
greater tooth strength and greater retention of these posts as compared to
prefabricated posts
(4) presents resilience comparable to the original tooth
(5) offers excellent adhesion to the tooth structure and composite resin at a low cost.
PostNdCore classification types n new trends
POST SPACE PREPARATION
 S e l e c t i o n o f tooth
 R e m o v a l o f g u t t a p e r c h a
 E n l a r g e m e n t o f t h e c a n a l
 I m p r e s s i o n :
 Direct technique
 Indirect technique
 I n v e s t m e n t a n d c a s t i n g
 C e m e n t a t i o n
1. ROOT SELECTION IN CASE OF MULTIROOTED TEETH
PREMOLARS
 When posts and cores are needed in premolars, posts are best placed in the
palatal root of the maxillary premolar and the straightest root of the
mandibular premolar. The buccal root could be prepared to a depth of 1 to 2
mm and to serve as an antirotational lock, if needed.
MOLARS
 When posts and cores are needed in molars, posts are best placed in roots
that have the greatest dentin thickness and the smallest developmental
root depressions.
 Maxillary molars : palatal roots
 Mandibular molars :distal roots
 The facial roots of maxillary molars and the mesial root of mandibular molars
should be avoided if at all possible. If these roots must be used, then the post
length should be short (3 to 4 mm) and a small-diameter instrument should
be used (no larger than a No. 2 Peeso instrument that is 1.0 mm in diameter).
2. GUTTA PERCHA REMOVAL
Three methods have been advocated for the removal of gutta-percha during
preparation of a post space:
1. Chemical (oil of eucalyptus, oil of turpentine, and chloroform),
2. Thermal (electrical or heated instruments), and
3. Mechanical (Gates Glidden drills, Peeso reamers, etc.).
 The chemical removal of gutta-percha for post space preparation is not utilized
for specific reasons (microleakage, inability to control removal)
 However, thermal and mechanical techniques or a combination of both are
routinely used.
 Dentists often use mechanical preparation techniques for post spaces
because it is faster. The thermal method of removing gutta- percha using
heat pluggers is safer but more time-consuming.
 When mechanical preparation is preferred, it has been established that
Gates-Glidden drills and Peeso reamers used on low speed are the safest
instruments.
 The provision of a longer post that preserves maximum root dentine and 4-5
mm of gutta percha apical seal, combined with extra- coronal support offers
the best prognosis.
 A post length of 7.0-8.0 mm is frequently stated as a typical
guideline.
REMOVAL WITH A HEATED ENDODONTIC CONDENSER
 In this method a heated endodontic plugger or an electronic device is used to remove
the gutta-percha.
 This method is commonly used when gutta- percha is to be removed right after
obturation as there are minimal chances of disturbing the apical seal.
TECHNIQUE:
 Apply rubber dam to prevent aspiration of instrument.
 Select an endodontic condenser large enough to hold heat well but not so large that it
binds against the canal walls.
 The instrument is heated till it is red hot, inserted into the gutta-percha and is
quickly withdrawn.
 This sears off the gutta-percha.
REMOVAL WITH ROTARY INSTRUMENTS
 GG drills and Peeso Remaers are most often used.
PREPARATION OF CORONAL TOOTH
STRUCTURE
POST SPACE PREPARATION
CUSTOM CAST POST FABRICATION
1. DIRECT METHOD
2. INDIRECT METHOD
PREPARATION OF CORONAL TOOTH STRUCTURE
 Ignore any missing tooth structure and prepare the remaining tooth as
though it was undamaged.
 The facial surface (in anteriors) should be adequately reduced for good
esthetics.
 Remove all undercuts that will prevent removal of pattern.
 Preserve as much tooth structure as possible.
 Prepare the finish line at least 2mm gingival to the core. This establishes
the ferrule.
 For custom-made post and core restorations,
place a contra bevel with a flame-shaped
diamond at the junction of the core and tooth
structure.
 The bevel provides a metal collar around the
occlusal circumference of the preparation (in
addition to the ferrule) in bracing the tooth against
fracture.
 It also provides a vertical stop to prevent over-
seating and wedging effect of the post.
 Complete the preparations by eliminating
sharp angles and establishing a smooth finish
line.
DIRECT TECHNIQUE
 Trim a 14-gauge solid plastic sprue so that it slides easily into the canal to the apical
end of the post preparation without binding.
 Cut a small notch on the facial portion to aid in orientation during subsequent
steps.
 Mix acrylic resin monomer and polymer to a runny
consistency.
 Lubricate canal with petroleum or any other lubricating agent, on cotton wrapped on a
Peeso reamer.
 Fill the orifice of the canal as full as possible with acrylic resin applied with a plastic
filling instrument.
 Alternatively: – In the doughy stage, roll the resin into a thin cylinder, introduce it in
the canal and push it to place with the monomer-softened sprue.
POST FABRICATION
 Seat the monomer coated sprue completely into the canal.
 Make sure the external bevel is completely covered with resin at this time.
Trying to cover it later may disturb the fit of the post. When acrylic resin
becomes tough and doughy, pump the pattern in and out to insure that it will
not lock into undercuts.
 As the resin polymerizes, remove post from canal and make sure it
extends till the apical end.
 If required, additional resin can be placed at the apical end and the post is
reseated and removed. Any voids can be filled with soft dead wax e.g. utilizing
wax Reinsert and remove to ensure smooth withdrawal.
 Slightly overbuild the core and allow it to fully polymerize.
 Shape the core with carbide finishing burs.
 Correct any small defects with wax
 A direct pattern can also be made using inlay wax in a similar manner.
 Add more resin or wax to form the core.
 Shape it in the form of the final preparation.
Orthodontic wire is bent to
form a J-shape
It is inserted into the canal and
the fit is verified
Coat is wired with adhesive and
the canal is lubricated
Canal, with the seated wire, is
injected with elastomeric
impression material
Some of the impression material
is syringed around the teeth and
impression is taken
INDIRECT PROCEDURE
Cast is poured
In the lab a plastic post is
selected and it is extended to
the full depth using
impression as a guide
Stine cast is lubricated, and
inlay wax is added in
increments on post
Post pattern is fabricated
followed by core fabrication
and shaping
Casting of the pattern is done
INVESTING AND CASTING
 The post-core pattern is sprued on the incisal or occlusal end.
 1.0 to 2.0cc of extra water is added to the investment and a liner is omitted to
increase the casting shrinkage.
 This results in a slightly smaller post that does not bind in the canal, and it
also provides space for the cement.
 A tight fit may cause root fracture.
 When resin is used, the pattern should remain for 30 minutes longer in the
burnout oven to ensure complete elimination of the resin.
 The final post, core and crown should be fabricated as soon as possible,
because microleakage can contaminate the post space and endodontic fill.
TRY IN
 Check the fit of the post-core in the tooth by seating it with light pressure.
 If it binds in canal or will not seat completely, air abrade the post and
reinsert it in the canal.
 The core portion of the casting should be polished.
 If required, a vertical groove, from apical end to contrabevel, can be cut
in the post to provide an escape vent for the cement.
 The canal should be cleaned with a cavity cleaner to remove lubricant /
temporary cement which may inhibit set of resin cements and decrease
retention.
CEMENTATION
 Cements are best introduced into the canal with a lentulo- spiral and the post also
coated with cement. The most commonly used dental cements—
 zinc phosphate,
 polycarboxylate,
 glass ionomer cement,
 resin-based composite
 hybrid of resin and ionomer cements
 zinc phosphate has had the longest history of success.
 In the case of an endodontic failure, a metal post that is cemented in the canal space
with zinc phosphate is easier to remove and has a lower risk of root fracture
compared with a metal post that is bonded strongly with a resin-based composite
cement in the root canal space.
 Resin-based composite, on the other hand, is becoming increasingly popular because of its
potential to bond todentin
Any residual gutta-percha and root canal sealer
must be removed from the dentinal walls to ensure
proper bonding of resin to dentin
Removal of the demineralized collagen layer using a
specific proteolytic agent such as sodium hypochlorite
has been shown in an SEM study to improve the bonding
of resin to the root canal wall owing to the penetration of
resin tags into dentinal tubules along the wall.
A lentulo spiral can be used to carry acid etchant into the
post space, while a fine-tipped microapplicator can be
used to coat the canal walls with bonding agent..
Morgano and bracket : described some of the desirable features of a core
material. They include:
 Adequate compressive strength to resist intraoral forces
 Sufficient flexural strength
 Biocompatibility
 Resistance to leakage of oral fluids at the core-to tooth interface
 Ease of manipulation
 Ability to bond to remaining tooth structure
 Thermal coefficient of expansion and contraction similar to tooth structure
 Dimensional stability
 Minimal potential for water absorption
 Inhibition of dental caries.
PRINCIPLES OF CORE BUILD UP
 Stability in wet environment
 Ease of manipulation
 Rapid, hard set for immediate crown preparation
 Natural tooth color
 High compressive strength
 High tensile strength
 High fracture toughness
 Low plastic deformation
 Inert (no corrosion)
 Cariostatic properties
 Biocompatibility
 Inexpensiveness.
CORE MATERIALS
 Cast core
 Amalgam
 Composite
 Glass ionomer cement
CAST CORE
 Core is an integral part of the post and it does not need mechanical
means for retention to the post
 Prevents dislodgment of core and crown from post
 Sometimes, more structure is removed for space preparation to create
path of withdrawal
 Placing cast gold post and core, however, is an indirect procedure requiring two
visits.
AMALGAM
 Widely used for the longest time.
 Placing an amalgam core requires a prolonged setting time, making it difficult
to prepare immediately after placement if a crown is the final restoration.
 Requires additional pins to provide retention and resistance to rotation
 The presence of mercury in amalgam, was also of concern
 Esthetic problems with ceramic crowns and make gingiva look dark
 No natural adhesive properties and needs adhesive system
GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS
 Lack adequate strength and fracture toughness
 Not to be used in teeth with extensive loss of structure
 Soluble and sensitive to moisture
COMPOSITE
 Resin-based composite offers an esthetically pleasing material especially in the
anterior section under an all- porcelain restoration.
 Most widely accepted and used
 Advantages:
 Good bonding for retention
 High tensile strength
 Tooth can be prepared right after polymerization
 Esthetic
 Fracture resistance comparable to amalgam
 It has good strength characteristics and low solubility.
 Disadvantages:
 Polymerization shrinkage causing gaps in areas where adhesion is
the weakest
 Adhesion to dentin on pulpal floor is not as strong
 Strict isolation
THE FINAL RESTORATION
 Castings such as gold onlay, gold crowns, metal- ceramic crowns, and all-
porcelain restorations with cuspal coverage are used routinely as standard and
acceptable methods to restore posterior endodonticaly treated teeth.
CAUSES OF FAILURE :
 Vire classified failure of endodontically treated teeth are:
 Prosthetic failures.
 Periodontic failures.
 Endodontic failures.
 Of these, prosthetic failures occurred 59.4% of the times, thus emphasizing
the need to properly restore endodontically treated teeth to increase their
longevity.
 For post and core restorations, failure rates between 7% and
15% have been reported in the literature (Torbjorner).
 The main factors that make endodontically treated teeth more disposed to
technical failure are:
 Root fracture: Thin-walled weakened roots unable to withstand high
stress.
 Dislodgement of post: Reduced retentive surfaces resulting in high stress
levels in the cement.
 Fracture of post.
 Caries
 Periodontal disease.
 Careful, case selection, adherence to biomechanical principles of post and core
restoration, appropriate post selection and meticulous maintenance of oral
hygiene on the part of the patient can prevent this.
If certain basic principles are followed in the restoration of endodontically
treated teeth, it is possible to achieve high levels of clinical success with
most of the current restorative systems.
These principles include:
1. Avoid bacterial contamination of the root-canal system
2. Provide cuspal coverage for posterior teeth
3. Preserve radicular and coronal tooth structure
4. Use posts with adequate strength in thin diameters
5. Provide adequate post length for retention
6. Maximize resistance form including an adequate ferrule
7. Use posts that are retrievable.
The trend in clinical practice is toward fiber posts, and the literature is
generally, although not overwhelmingly, favorable toward them. Their
performance in vitro approximates that of metal posts and most studies
agree that their failure mode is more favorable than with metal posts
THANK YOU

More Related Content

PPT
Post & core
PPT
POST AND CORE (2).ppt
PPTX
Rehabilitation of endodontically treated teeth : Post & Core
PPTX
post and core.pptx
PPTX
Post core systems
PPTX
Post and core
PPT
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth / dental implant courses
PPT
Post & core final
Post & core
POST AND CORE (2).ppt
Rehabilitation of endodontically treated teeth : Post & Core
post and core.pptx
Post core systems
Post and core
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth / dental implant courses
Post & core final

What's hot (20)

PPTX
gingival tissue management
PPT
Connectors in fpd / dental continuing education
PPTX
Laminates Veneers in Dentistry
PPTX
Cast post - Restoration of endodontically treated teeth
PPTX
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth
PPTX
Endo crown
PPTX
FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE -DESIGN CONSIDERATION
PDF
ABUTMENTS IN FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE
PPTX
Single visit endodontics
PPTX
Hybrid layer
PPTX
Ferrule 3
PPTX
Standardisation of endodontic instruments
PPTX
Other forms of removable partial denture
PPTX
PDF
Provisional restoration
PPT
Die materials and Die system - Dental
PPT
Designing for kennedy class i and class ii
PPTX
Failures in FPD
PPTX
Gingival tissue management
PPT
Resin bonded FPDs
gingival tissue management
Connectors in fpd / dental continuing education
Laminates Veneers in Dentistry
Cast post - Restoration of endodontically treated teeth
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth
Endo crown
FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE -DESIGN CONSIDERATION
ABUTMENTS IN FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE
Single visit endodontics
Hybrid layer
Ferrule 3
Standardisation of endodontic instruments
Other forms of removable partial denture
Provisional restoration
Die materials and Die system - Dental
Designing for kennedy class i and class ii
Failures in FPD
Gingival tissue management
Resin bonded FPDs
Ad

Similar to PostNdCore classification types n new trends (20)

PPTX
Post and core
PPTX
post and core restoration of damaged tooth.pptx
PPTX
Custom made post & Core in endodontics
PPTX
PROSTHODONTIC MANAGEMENT OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH
PPTX
Post and Core presentation.pIN DENSITRYptx
PPTX
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth
PPTX
Advanced treatment of post & core - A presentation
PPTX
Endodontically treated teeth ppt - a detail
PPTX
1. Restoration of Endo Rx Teeth (2).pptx
PPTX
restoration of endodontically treated teeth in prosthodontics/ post and core
PPTX
Post and core buildup
PPTX
post and core implications in prosthodontics
PPTX
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth
PPTX
POST AND CORE
PPT
Factors Determining Post Selection
PPTX
Post dr. hicham nuaimi
PPTX
dental post and core different material .pptx
PPTX
dental post and core
PPTX
dental post and core
PPTX
post endontic restoration and post and core .pptx
Post and core
post and core restoration of damaged tooth.pptx
Custom made post & Core in endodontics
PROSTHODONTIC MANAGEMENT OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH
Post and Core presentation.pIN DENSITRYptx
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth
Advanced treatment of post & core - A presentation
Endodontically treated teeth ppt - a detail
1. Restoration of Endo Rx Teeth (2).pptx
restoration of endodontically treated teeth in prosthodontics/ post and core
Post and core buildup
post and core implications in prosthodontics
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth
POST AND CORE
Factors Determining Post Selection
Post dr. hicham nuaimi
dental post and core different material .pptx
dental post and core
dental post and core
post endontic restoration and post and core .pptx
Ad

More from aishwaryakhare5 (20)

PPTX
inlays and onlays powerrpoint presentation
PPTX
FUNDATINMENTALS OF CAVITY PREPARATION.pptx
PPTX
CLASS II CAST METAL RESTORATIONS.powerpoint
PPT
ENDODONTIC MICROBIOLOGY types of bacteria powerpoint
PPT
Disease of Dental Pulp powerpoint presentation
PPTX
indirect tooth colored restoration uses advantages and disadvantages
PPTX
direct gold restoration classification uses and types
PPT
restoring contact and contour classification
PPTX
composite restoration classification and uses
PPTX
CLEANING N SHAPING methods advantages and disadvantages
PPTX
case selection and treatment planning intervention
PPT
RATIONALE OF ENDO TREATMENT usefulness and advantages
PPT
procedural errors diagnosis and treatment
PPT
OBTURATION TECHNIQUES ,methods, types and uses
PPT
CASE SELECTION AND TREATMENT PLANNING IN ENDODONTICS.ppt
PPTX
IRRIGATION uses and techniques , advantages and disadvantages
PPT
5.Intra canal medicaments types and uses
PPT
4. Biomechanical Preparation ..........ppt
PPT
CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC METHOD aids and advantages
PPTX
Introduction To Operative Dentistry.pptx
inlays and onlays powerrpoint presentation
FUNDATINMENTALS OF CAVITY PREPARATION.pptx
CLASS II CAST METAL RESTORATIONS.powerpoint
ENDODONTIC MICROBIOLOGY types of bacteria powerpoint
Disease of Dental Pulp powerpoint presentation
indirect tooth colored restoration uses advantages and disadvantages
direct gold restoration classification uses and types
restoring contact and contour classification
composite restoration classification and uses
CLEANING N SHAPING methods advantages and disadvantages
case selection and treatment planning intervention
RATIONALE OF ENDO TREATMENT usefulness and advantages
procedural errors diagnosis and treatment
OBTURATION TECHNIQUES ,methods, types and uses
CASE SELECTION AND TREATMENT PLANNING IN ENDODONTICS.ppt
IRRIGATION uses and techniques , advantages and disadvantages
5.Intra canal medicaments types and uses
4. Biomechanical Preparation ..........ppt
CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC METHOD aids and advantages
Introduction To Operative Dentistry.pptx

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
SE-Unit-1.pptxmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnnn
PPTX
430838499-Anaesthesiiiia-Equipmenooot.pptx
PPTX
Gender Sensitizations and females learning
PDF
BPT_Beach_Energy_FY25_half_year_results_presentation.pdf
PPTX
Trends in Recruitment and Talent acquisition___.pptx
PPTX
Creative-Nonfiction-Demystified.pptxhhhh
PDF
Women’s Talk Session 1- Talking about women
PPTX
ANN DL UNIT 1 ANIL 13.10.24.pptxcccccccccc
PDF
202s5_Luciano André Deitos Koslowski.pdf
PPTX
GPAT Presentation PPT and details about imp topics.pptx
PDF
CollegePresentation.pdf hsjsisjsjsjsssoo
PPT
14001jhgASIUODOHAFJCOPJHF9SUY9GFJSLOGHJ9IOSUHG98
PPTX
Unit 3 Presentation Etiquette Business and Corporate Etiquette
PPTX
DiagdndigsbskshsvsjsisDiarrheal Diseases-1.pptx
PPTX
ChandigarhUniversityinformationcareer.pptx
PPTX
Unit 2 CORPORATE CULTURE AND EXPECTATIONS
PPTX
obstetric instruments for final year mbbs students
PPTX
SE_UNIT_2_Complete_PPT.pptxzsdsdsdsdsdsddsd
PPTX
Unit 1- Introduction to Corporate Etiquettes
PDF
IMPORTANT QUES CLASS 12.pdf english by Tania sharma
SE-Unit-1.pptxmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnnnn
430838499-Anaesthesiiiia-Equipmenooot.pptx
Gender Sensitizations and females learning
BPT_Beach_Energy_FY25_half_year_results_presentation.pdf
Trends in Recruitment and Talent acquisition___.pptx
Creative-Nonfiction-Demystified.pptxhhhh
Women’s Talk Session 1- Talking about women
ANN DL UNIT 1 ANIL 13.10.24.pptxcccccccccc
202s5_Luciano André Deitos Koslowski.pdf
GPAT Presentation PPT and details about imp topics.pptx
CollegePresentation.pdf hsjsisjsjsjsssoo
14001jhgASIUODOHAFJCOPJHF9SUY9GFJSLOGHJ9IOSUHG98
Unit 3 Presentation Etiquette Business and Corporate Etiquette
DiagdndigsbskshsvsjsisDiarrheal Diseases-1.pptx
ChandigarhUniversityinformationcareer.pptx
Unit 2 CORPORATE CULTURE AND EXPECTATIONS
obstetric instruments for final year mbbs students
SE_UNIT_2_Complete_PPT.pptxzsdsdsdsdsdsddsd
Unit 1- Introduction to Corporate Etiquettes
IMPORTANT QUES CLASS 12.pdf english by Tania sharma

PostNdCore classification types n new trends

  • 1. POST AND CORE Dr. Alvin George 3rd Year Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
  • 2.  Introduction  Definition  Indications  Contraindications  History  Classification  Types of posts  Ferrule  Post space preparation  Post fabrication  Try in  Cementation  Principles of core build up  Cause of failure  Conclusion  References
  • 3. RESTORATIONS OF ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH ARE DESIGNED TO: 1. Protect the remaining tooth from fracture, 2. Prevent reinfection of the root canal system, and, 3. Replace the missing tooth structure. INTRODUCTION :
  • 4. Endodontics, Ingle  Restorations that encompass the cusps of endodontically treated posterior teeth have been found to increase the clinical longevity of these teeth. Therefore, crowns should be placed on endodontically treated posterior teeth that have occlusal intercuspation with opposing teeth of the nature that places expansive forces on the cusps.  Since crowns do not enhance the clinical success of anterior endodontically treated teeth, their use on relatively sound teeth should be limited to situations where esthetic and functional requirements cannot be adequately achieved by other more conservative restorations
  • 5. DEFINITIONS :  Dowel (Post): The dowel is a metal post or other rigid restorative material placed in the radicular portion of a non vital tooth. A dowel, usually made of metal, is fitted in to a prepared canal of a natural tooth. When combined with an artificial crown or core, it provides retention and resistance for the restoration. (Glossary of Prosthodontics)  Core: Refers to properly shaped and well substructure, which replaces missing coronal structure and retains the final restoration. The core is designed to resemble or become the crown preparation or crown itself. (Glossary of Prosthodontics)
  • 6. INDICATIONS :  Where the natural crown of root-filled teeth either has been lost or is extensively damaged.  Where the root-filled tooth is to be used as bridge abutment.  Where a change in axial position greater than 1mm is required.  In a crowned anterior endodontically involved tooth, to reinforce the crown covered tooth at cervical area susceptible to fracture.
  • 7. CONTRAINDICATIONS :  Severe curvature of the root-eg: Dilacerations of the root.  Persistent periapical lesion  Poor periodontal health  Poor crown to root ratio  Weak / fragile roots  Teeth with heavy occlusal contacts  Patients with unusual and occupational habits  Economic factors  Inadequate skill.
  • 8. HISTORY :  In 1728, Pierre Fauchard described the use of “TENONS” which were metal posts screwed into the roots of teeth to retain the prosthesis  1745 – Claude Mouton published his design of a gold crown with a gold post that was to be inserted into the root.  1830-1870 –Wood replaced metal as the material of choice for posts.  1839 Harris proposed that gold and platinum were superior to brass, silver and copper which tended to corrode.
  • 9.  G.V. Black 1869 developed porcelain fused to metal crown held in by a screw inserted into a canal filled with gold foil  “Pivot crown” – a wooden post fitted to an artificial crown and to root canal.  In 1966 prefabricated posts and composite resin cores came into use.  In1990 Duret et al. described a non-metallic material for the fabrication of posts based on the carbon-fibre reinforcement principle.
  • 10. AN IDEAL POST SYSTEM ACCORDING TO WAGNILD ET AL (2002) SHOULD HAVE THE FOLLOWING FEATURES :  Provide maximal retentiveness to the core.  Physical properties compatible to core  Maximum retention with minimum removal of dentin  Even distribution of functional stresses along root surfaces  Esthetic compatibility  Minimal stress during placement and cementation  Resistance to displacement.  Easy retrievability  Ease of use  Reasonable cost Grossman
  • 11. ACCORDING TO COHEN : Posts should provide as many of the following clinical features as possible:  Maximal protection of the root from fracture  Maximal retention within the root and retrievability  Maximal retention of the core and crown  Maximal protection of the crown margin seal from coronal leakage  Pleasing esthetics, when indicated  High radiographic visibility  Biocompatibility
  • 12. ACCORDING TO WEINE 1. Custom-cast Posts 2. Prefabricated Posts  Tapered, smooth sided post systems  Parallel-sided, serrated and vented posts  Tapered, self-threading post systems  Parallel- sided, threaded post systems  Parallel-sided, threaded, split-shank post systems CLASSIFICATION OF POSTS :
  • 13. ACCORDING TO INGLE 1. Custom-cast Posts 2. Prefabricated Posts  Tapered, smooth-sided posts  Parallel-sided posts  Tapered, self-threading screws  Parallel-sided, threaded posts  Parallel-sided, tapered apical end posts
  • 14. ACCORDING TO ROBBINS 1. Metallic Posts  Custom-cast Posts  Prefabricated Posts i. Passive Tapered Posts ii. Passive Parallel Posts iii. Active Posts 2. Non-metallic Posts  Carbon Fiber Posts  Tooth Colored Posts
  • 15. ACCORDING TO SCHWARTZ 1. Active versus Passive Posts 2. Parallel versus Tapered Posts 3. Prefabricated versus custom made 4. According to material composition: i. Metal posts ii. Ceramic and Zirconium Posts iii. Fiber Posts a. Carbon Fibre posts b. Quartz fibre c. Glass fibre d. Silicon fibre
  • 16. ACCORDING TO ROSENSTEIL 1. Tapered, smooth-sided posts 2. Tapered, serrated posts 3. Tapered, threaded posts 4. Parallel, smooth-sided posts 5. Parallel, serrated posts 6. Parallel, threaded posts
  • 18. Singh, Chandra, Pandit, A New Classification of Post and Core; Indian Journal Of Restorative Dentistry,Sept- Dec2015;4(3):56- 58. A. CLASSIFICATION OF CAST POST  According to type of alloy  Gold alloy  Chrome-Cobalt alloy  Nickel-Chromium alloy  According to number of posts:  Single Post  Multiple Post One Piece Post Two Piece Post • Two piece cast post • Combination of cast post
  • 19. B. CLASSIFICATION OF PREFABRICATED POST  According to Taper  Parallel  Tapered  Parallel Tapered  According to surface character  Smooth  Serrated  Self threading  According to fit  Active  Pasive Singh, Chandra, Pandit, A New Classification of Post and Core; Indian Journal Of Restorative Dentistry,Sept-Dec2015;4(3):56- 58.
  • 20.  According to material  Metallic  Titanium  Stainless steel  Brass  Non-metallic  Non esthetic • Carbon fibre post  Esthetic • Polyethelene Fibre • Glass fibre • Quartz • Ceramic Singh, Chandra, Pandit, A New Classification of Post and Core; Indian Journal Of Restorative Dentistry,Sept-Dec2015;4(3):56- 58.
  • 21.  According to light transmission  Light transmitting  Non-Light transmitting  According to Vent  With Vent  Without Vent  According to Monoblock formation  Monobloc formation  No Monobloc formation Singh, Chandra, Pandit, A New Classification of Post and Core; Indian Journal Of Restorative Dentistry,Sept-Dec2015;4(3):56- 58.
  • 22. CUSTOM CAST POSTS Indications: 1. When the remaining coronal tooth structure supporting an artificial crown is minimal so that it can’t resist torsional forces. 2. When multiple cores are being placed in the same arch and small teeth such as mandibular incisors, 3. When there is minimal coronal tooth structure available for antirotation features or bonding. TYPES OF POSTS
  • 23.  Advantages:  It offers the advantages of easy retrievability of post,  greater strength  excellent core retention.  Better adaptation in cases of elliptical and extremely tapered canals  Disadvantages:  Esthetics, as the metal shows through the newer all ceramic restorations.  Increased susceptibility to root fracture  Two visit procedure  Additional lab fee.
  • 24. PREFAABRICATED POSTS  Prefabricated metallic posts are frequently used for the fabrication of a direct foundation restoration. These posts are classified several ways, including by alloy composition, retention mode, and shape  Materials used to fabricate metallic posts include gold alloys, stainless steel, or titanium alloys
  • 25. ADVANTAGES OF PRE-FABRICATED POST-CORE SYSTEMS OVER CAST POST  They are simple to use.  Require less chair side time.  Can be completed in one appointment.  Are easy to temporize.
  • 26. MAJOR DISADVANTAGES OF PRE-FABRICATED POST-CORE SYSTEMS  The root is designed to accept the post rather than the post being designed to fit the root.  Their application is limited when considerable coronal tooth structure is lost.  Chemical reactions are possible when the post and core materials are made of dissimilar metals.  Attachments for removable prostheses cannot be applied, unless a separate casting is fabricated to place over it.
  • 27. ADVANTAGES OF CAST POST OVER PRE- FABRICATED POST-  They are custom fit to the root configuration.  Are adaptable to large irregularly shaped canals and orifices.  Can be adapted to be used with pre fabricated plastic patterns.
  • 28. DISADVANTAGES OF CAST-POST  Expensive  Requires two or more appointments.  Temporization between appointments is more difficult.  Risk of casting inaccuracies  May require the removal of additional coronal tooth structure
  • 29. STAINLESS STEEL POSTS  Have been used for a long time in prefabricated posts.  Contains nickel, and nickel sensitivity is a concern, especially among female patients.  A recent study indicates that the flexural strength of stainless steel posts is about 1430 MPa and that flexural modulus approximates 110 GPA  Stainless steel and brass have problems with corrosion. METALLIC POSTS
  • 30. TITANIUM POSTS  less rigid (66 GPa)  flexural strength (1280 MPa) similar to stainless steel.  least corrosive  most biocompatible  low fracture strength and tend to break more easily compared with stainless steel posts during removal in retreatment cases.  titanium alloys used in posts have a density similar to that of gutta-percha when seen on radiographs, which makes them more difficult to detect
  • 31. FIBRE POST  A fiber post consists of reinforcing fibers embedded in a resin polymerized matrix.  Monomers used to form the resin matrix are typically bifunctional methacrylates (Bis- GMA, UDMA, TEGDMA), but epoxies have also been used. NON-METALLIC POSTS
  • 32.  Common fibers in today’s fiber posts are made of carbon, glass, silica, or quartz  The fibers are 7 to 10 micrometers in diameter and are available in a number of different configurations, including braided, woven and longitudinal.  The lower flexural modulus of fiber-reinforced posts (between 1 and 4 × 106 psi), measures closer to that of dentin (≈ 2 × 106 psi) and can decrease the incidence of root fracture.  Current fiber posts are radiopaque and may also conduct the light for polymerization of resin-based luting cements.  A light- transmitting post results in better polymerization of resin composites in the apical area.  Bonding fiber posts to root canal dentin can improve the distribution of forces applied along the root, thereby decreasing the risk of root fracture and contributing to the reinforcement of the remaining tooth structure.
  • 33. CARBON FIBRE POST  The carbon fibre prefabricated post, introduced in the early 1990s, is comprised of longitudinally aligned carbon fibres embedded in an epoxy resin matrix (approx 36%).  This type of post has no radiopacity and is black in colour – both significant clinical disadvantages.
  • 34.  In a prospective clinical trial more failures were seen in the carbon-fibre-posted teeth than those with conventional prefabricated posts.  Also, a longer term follow up of the 236 teeth in the favourable Frederiscksson report concluded that the carbon-fibre restored teeth had shorter survival times than those previously documented for cast posts
  • 35. ZIRCONIA POSTS  Zirconia posts are composed of zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) partially stabilized with yttrium oxide and exhibit a high flexural strength.  Zirconia posts are  esthetic,  partially adhesive,  very rigid,  but also brittle.
  • 36.  Zirconia posts cannot be etched, and available literature suggests that bonding resins to these materials is less predictable and requires sub- stantially different bonding methods than conventional ceramics. When a composite core is built on a zirconia post, core retention may also be a problem  Other reports indicate that the rigidity of zirconia posts negatively affects the quality of the interface between the resin core material and dentin when subjected to fatigue testing
  • 37. ACTIVE POSTS  Active posts derive their primary retentiondirectly from the root dentin by the use of threads. Most active posts are threaded and are intended to be screwed into the walls of the root canal.
  • 38.  A major concern about threaded posts has been the potential for vertical root fracture during placement. As the post is screwed into place, it introduces great stresses within the root, causing a wedging effect. Therefore, it is generally accepted that the use of threaded posts should be avoided.  Active posts are more retentive than passive posts, and can be used safely, only in substantial roots with maximum remaining dentin.  Their use should be limited to short roots in which maximum retention is needed.
  • 39. PASSIVE POSTS  Passive posts are passively placed in close contact to the dentin walls, and their retention primarily relies on the luting cement used for cementation.
  • 40. PARALLEL AND TAPERED POSTS  A parallel post is more retentive than a tapered post but also requires removal of more root dentin during the preparation of the post space  The lower retention obtained with the tapered-end post is attributed to the lack of parallelism in the apical portions  Although tapered post shape requires less dentine removal and is more consistent with root anatomy, a growing body of evidence suggests that tapered, unbonded posts exert a wedge effect that puts the root at risk of fracture and predisposes to loss of retention
  • 41. PRETREATMENT EVALUATION AND TREATMENT STRATEGY  ENDODONTIC,  PERIODONTAL  BIOMECHANICAL  ANATOMIC EVALUATIONS
  • 42. ENDODONTIC EVALUATION  Endodontic retreatment is indicated for teeth showing radio- graphic signs of apical periodontitis or clinical symptoms of inflammation.  Canals obturated with a silver cone or other inappropriate filling material should be endodontically retreated before starting any restorative therapy.
  • 43. PERIODONTAL EVALUATION The following conditions are to be considered as critical for treatment success:  Healthy gingival tissue  Normal bone architecture and attachment levels to favor periodontal health  Maintenance of biologic width and ferrule effect before and after endodontic and restorativephases
  • 44. BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION All previous events, from initial decay or trauma to final root canal therapy, influence the biomechanical status of the tooth and the selection of restorative materials and procedures Important clinical factors include the following:  The amount and quality of remaining tooth structure  The anatomic position of the tooth  The occlusal forces on the tooth  The restorative requirements of the tooth  Teeth with minimal remaining tooth structure are at increased risk for the following clinical complications  Root fracture  Coronal-apical leakage  Recurrent caries  Dislodgment or loss of the core/prosthesis  Periodontal injury from biologic width invasion
  • 45. ANATOMIC EVALUATION  Root anatomy can also have significant influence over post placement and selection. Root curvature, furcations, developmental depressions, and root concavities observed at the external surface of the root are all likely to be reproduced inside the root canal. Within the same root, the shape of the canal will vary between the cervical level and the apical foramen  The tooth is also weakened if root dentin is sacrificed to place a larger- diameter post. Following normal and appropriate endodontic instrumentation, teeth can possess less than 1 mm of dentin, indicating that there should be no further root preparation for the post.
  • 46. BIOMECHANICAL PRINCIPLES  C O N S E RVATI O N O F TO OTH STR U CTU R E  R ETE NTI O N FO R M  R E S I STAN C E FO R M
  • 47. I. CONSERVATION OF TOOTH STRUCTURE  Remove minimal structure from the canal  Excessive enlargement can weaken or perforate the tooth  Thickness of remaining dentin - fracture resistance form  Helfer AR et al 1972. stated that teeth cemented with thicker posts (1.8 mm) fractured more easily than those with a thinner (1.3 mm) one.  Photo elastic studies also have show that internal stresses are reduced with thinner posts. 1. PREPARATION OF THE CANAL
  • 48.  Most roots have proximal concavities  Felton DA 1991, said that most root fractures originate from these concavities because the remaining dentin thickness is minimal. Root canal should be enlarged only enough to enable the post to fit accurately yet passively while insuring strength and retention.
  • 49. 2. PREPARATION OF CORONAL TISSUE :  As much of the coronal tooth structure should be conserved as possible because this helps reduce stress concentration at the gingival margin.  Milton P and Stein R S 1992 stated that if more than 2 mm of coronal tooth structure remains, the post design probably has a limited role in the fracture resistance of restored tooth. A key element of tooth preparation when using a dowel and core is the incorporation of a ferrule J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:515-19.
  • 50. FERRULE FERRUM – Iron VIRIOLA – Bracelet  A ferrule is a metal ring or cap used to strengthen the end of a stick or tube. A dental ferrule is an encircling band of cast metal around the coronal surface of the tooth. (Brown 1993)  A Subgingival collar or apron of gold which extends as far as possible beyond the gingival seat of the core and completely surrounds the perimeter of the cervical part of the tooth. It is an extension of the restored crown which, by its hugging action, prevents shattering of the root.(Rosen 1961)  The ferrule effect be defined as ‘‘a 360 metal collar of the crown surrounding the parallel walls of the dentine extending coronal to the shoulder of the preparation”. (Sorensen & Engelman)
  • 51.  It is often confused with the remaining amount of sound dentine above the finish line.  A ferrule, in respect to teeth, is a band that encircles the external dimension of residual tooth structure. A 2 mm height of tooth structure should be available to allow for a ferrule effect. Galen WW, Mueller KI: Restoration of the Endodontically Treated Tooth. In Cohen, S. Burns, RC, editors: Pathways of the Pulp, 10th Edition
  • 52.  Barkhordar et al. (1989) found that a metal collar signicantly increased resistance to root fracture. They also observed di¡erent fracture patterns in the collared teeth compared to those without collars. The collared group predominantly underwent patterns of horizontal fracture whereas the teeth without collars mainly exhibited patterns of vertical fracture (splitting). Stankiewicz & Wilson.The ferrule effect International Endodontic Journal, 35, 575-581, 2002
  • 53.  CROWN FERRULE: Ferrule created by the overlying crown engaging tooth structure.  CORE FERRULE: Ferrule that are part of a cast metal.
  • 54. FACTORS AFFECTING FERRULE EFFECT  Ferrule Height  Ferrule Width  Number of walls and ferrule location  Type of tooth and extent of lateral load
  • 55. FERRULE HEIGHT  Greater the height of remaining tooth structure better the fracture resistance.  Ferrule height of 1.5 to 2 mm of vertical tooth structure would be the most beneficial.a  The crown should encompass at least 2 mm past the tooth core connection to achieve the most protective ferrule effect. Trushkowsky RD:restoration of endodontically treated teeth:criteria and technique consideratioas. Quintes sence int 2014;45:557–67
  • 56. FERRULE WIDTH  Esthetic restorations often require fairly aggressive preparations at the gingival margin and sometimes buccal defects such as abfraction may compromise the buccal dentin wall.  It has been accepted that the walls are considered too thin if they are less than 1 mm in thickness, and would negate the ferrule effect.
  • 57. NUMBER OF WALLS AND FERRULE LOCATION  A circumferential ferrule would be optimal but caries may affect the interproximal areas and abrasion or erosion the buccal walls.  A crown preparation will further reduce the wall thickness and only a partial ferrule will remain.  Al-Wahadni and Gutteridge found having a 3- mm ferrule on the buccal aspect was better than having no ferrule at all
  • 58. TYPE OF TOOTH AND EXTENT OF LATERAL LOAD  Anterior teeth are loaded non-axially  Posterior teeth are loaded occluso-gingivally.  Anterior teeth with a deep overbite and parafunction are at a higher risk of failure.  Teeth that are in group function with long maxillary buccal cusps produce higher lateral forces than if there was canine guidance.
  • 59. ADVANTAGES OF FERRULE 1. Promoting hugging action, 2. Preventing the shattering of the root, 3. Antirotational effect 4. Reducing the wedging effect of a tapered dowel, and 5. Resisting functional lever forces and the lateral forces exerted during dowel insertion Rosen H: Operative procedures on mutilated endodontically treated eeth. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:973-986. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ: Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529-536
  • 61. Ferrule can be created in a no ferrule case 1.Crown lengthening 2.Forced eruption
  • 62. II. RETENTION FORM Post retention is defined as the ability of a post to resist vertical dislodging forces 1. Preparation Geometry 2. Post Configuration 3. Post length and diameter 4. Surface Texture 5. Luting Agent 6. Number of posts
  • 63. PREPARATION GEOMETRY  Circular cross section canals should be prepared with parallel walls or mimum taper,allowing use of parallel-prefabricated post.  Elliptical or excessively flared canals cannot be prepared to give parallel walls and require custom cast posts or tapered prefabricated posts.
  • 64. POST CONFIGURATION  Custom made posts are more retentive then the prefabricated as they are designed according.  Laboratory testing has confirmed that –  Parallel sided posts are more retentive than tapered posts. –  Threaded posts are the more retentive than smooth posts. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:139-44.
  • 65. POST LENGTH  Retention increases with increase in post length.  One study shows that retention increases by more than 97% when post length equals or is greater than crown length.  However, this length must be well within constraints of tooth length, canal morphology and root diameter in the apical area.  When average root length is encountered, post length is dictated by retaining 5 mm of apical gutta-percha and extending the post down to the gutta-percha
  • 66.  Whenever possible, posts should extend atleast 4mm apical to the bone crest to decrease dentin stress.  Molar posts should not be extended more than 7 mm into the root canal apical to the base of the pulp chamber
  • 67. GUIDELINES FOR POST LENGTH  The post length should equal the incisocervical or occlusocervical dimension of the crown  The post should be longer than the crown.  The post should be one and one third of the crown length  The post should be one half of the root length  The post should be two thirds of the root length
  • 68.  The post should be four fifths of the root length  The post should be as long as possible without disturbing the apical seal  The post preparation for molars should be limited to a depth of 7mm apical to the canal orifice  Perel and Muroff (1972) recommended that the post be at least half the length of root in bone.  To minimize stress in the dentin and in the post, the post should extend more than 4mm apical to the bone crest to decrease dentin stress
  • 69. POSTWIDTH  Whether posts are cemented or threaded, diameter makes little difference in retentive ability.  Instead, if the post diameter is increased, the amount of remaining dentin between the post and the external surface of the root is decreased.  This diminished remaining dentin becomes an area of high stress concentration under load and, consequently, an area with a high potential for failure.  The smallest diameter post that is practical should be used for a given clinical situation.  Deusch et al determined that there was a six fold increase in the potential for root fracture with every millimeter the tooth’s diameter was decreased.
  • 70.  There are three schools of thoughts regarding the post diameter –  Conservationist (Advocated by Mattison) : The post should be of the narrowest diameter that allows its fabrication for desired length  Preservationist (Advocated by Halle): – The entire surface of the dowel was surrounded by atleast 1mm of sound dentin  Proportionist (Advocated by Stern and Hirschfeld) : The apical diameter of the post space should be equal to one third the narrowest dimension of the root diameter at the terminus of root space
  • 72. POST SPACE WIDTH ACCORDING TO SHILLINBURG
  • 73. SURFACE ROUGHNESS  D’Arcangelo C et al :has shown that by acid etching the surface of the fiber posts with hydrofluoric acid and sand blasting through SEM analysis that presence of microretentive morphological changes, which certainly increase post-retentive properties without decreasing their flexural properties.  Monticelli F has shown the adverse effects of using Hydrofluoric acid for etching the fiber posts as it can cause the extensive damage to the fiber posts by giving rise to the micro-cracks and longitudinal fractures of the fiber layers.
  • 74.  In order to enhance retention, it is advised that before the cementation of a post, the canal space should be cleaned by application of a chelating agent to remove the smear layer. When smear layer is removed, it allows the cement to enter the dentinal tubules and provide micromechanical retention.  Commonly used agents for post space irrigation include EDTA or 5-5.25% NaOCl that denatures protein and removes collagen, and Acids (such as 50% citric acid and 37% phosphoric acid) that remove the smear layer and demineralise dentin as stated by Keles A et al.
  • 75. LUTING AGENT  Any of the current luting cements can be successfully used with a post if the proper principles are followed.  The most commonly used luting agents are: zinc phosphate, resin cement, glass-ionomer and resin- modified glass ionomer.  However, Resin-modified glass ionomer cements should be avoided as they expand on water absorption and may cause root fracture.  Generally, in the past, zinc phosphate was the cement of choice, but, recent trend has been toward resin cements because they:  – Increase retention.  – Tend to leak less than other cements.
  • 76. NUMBER OF POSTS  It is possible to place more than one post in teeth with multiple roots.  Additional posts may be used, where feasible, to increase retention and retain core material, especially in severely broken down teeth
  • 77. III. RESISTANCE FORM  Resistance is defined as the ability of the post and tooth to withstand lateral and rotational forces.  One of the functions of a post and core restoration is to improve resistance to laterally directed forces by distributing them over as large an area as possible.  However, excessive preparation of the root weakens it and increases the probability of failure.  The post design should distribute stresses as evenly as possible.
  • 78.  The influence of post design on stress distribution has been tested using. Photo elastic materials. Finite elements analysis Strain gauges and  The greatest stress concentrations are found at the shoulder, particularly interproximally, and at the apex.  Dentin should be conserved in these areas
  • 79.  Stress is reduced as post length increases. But excessive length reduces the thickness of dentin at the apical area and hence the fracture resistance decreases.  Parallel-sided posts distribute stresses more evenly than tapered posts, which can have a wedging effect. However, parallel posts generate high stresses at the apex.  Sharp angles should be avoided as they produce high stresses during loading.
  • 80.  High stress can be generated during insertions of smooth parallel-sided posts that have no vent for escape of cements. Therefore, in these posts, longitudinal grooves (vents) running along the length of the post should be provided to allow escape of cement thus reducing the hydrostatic pressure and generation of stress.  Tapered posts are self-venting and generally do not require vents.  Threaded posts can produce high stresses during insertion and loading, but they have been shown to distribute stress evenly if the posts are backed off a half- turn.
  • 81. ROTATIONAL RESISTANCE  In molars it’s commonly achieved by the square shape of the tooth; however premolars and anterior teeth are commonly more round.  It is important that a post with a circular cross section not rotate during function.  Where sufficient coronal tooth structure remains, this should not present a problem because the axial wall then prevents rotation.  When coronal dentin has been completely lost, a small groove placed in the canal can serve as an anti-rotational element.  The groove is normally placed where the root is bulkiest, usually on the lingual aspect.
  • 82.  Many cast posts resist rotational forces because they are oblong in cross section. However, the cast post for round canals, such as the maxillary incisor requires locking notches or keyways incorporated into the canal to resist rotational movement (Gutmann JL et al; 1977, and Dewhirst RB et al; 1969).
  • 83.  Ferrule is an important feature in the resistance form
  • 84.  Both laboratory and clinical data fail to provide definitive support for the concept that posts strengthen endodontically treated teeth. Therefore, the purpose of a post is to provide retention for a core. Endodontics, Ingle With Pulpless Teeth, Do Posts Improve Long-Term Clinical Prognosis or Enhance Strength? Endodontics, Ingle What Are the Most Common Types of Post and Core Failures?  Loss of retention and tooth fracture are the two most common causes of post and core failure.
  • 85.  Posts and cores had an average clinical failure rate of 9% (7 to 14% range) when the data from 10 studies were combined (average study length of 8 years). Endodontics, Ingle What Is the Clinical Failure Rate of Posts and Cores? Endodontics, Ingle Which Post Design Produces the Greatest Retention?  Tapered posts are the least retentive and threaded posts the most retentive in laboratory studies  Most of the clinical data support the laboratory findings.
  • 86. Endodontics, Ingle Is There a Relationship Between Post Form and the Potential for Root Fracture?  When evaluating the combined data from multiple clinical studies, threaded posts generally produced the highest root fracture incidence (7%) compared with tapered cemented posts (2%) and parallel cemented posts (1%). Endodontics, Ingle
  • 87. Endodontics, Ingle What Is the Proper Length for a Post?  Make the post approximately two- third of the length of the root when treating long-rooted teeth.  When average root length is encountered, post length is dictated by retaining 5 mm of apical gutta- percha and extending the post to the gutta-percha  Whenever possible,posts should extend atleast 4mm apical to the bone crest to decrease dentin stress.  Molar posts should not be extended more than 7 mm into the root canal apical to the base of the pulp chamber Endodontics, Ingle
  • 88. Endodontics, Ingle What Is the Proper Length for a Post?  Since there is greater leakage when only 2 to 3 mm of gutta- percha is present, 4 to 5 mm should be retained apically to ensure an adequate seal. Endodontics, Ingle Does Post Diameter Affect Retention and the Potential for Tooth Fracture?  Laboratory studies relating retention to post diameter have produced mixed results, whereas a more definitive relationship has been established between root fracture and large-diameter posts
  • 89. Endodontics, Ingle What Is the Relationship Between Post Diameter and the Potential for Root Perforations?  Safe instrument diameters to use are 0.6 to 0.7 mm for small teeth such as mandibular incisors and 1 to 1.2 mm for large-diameter roots such as the maxillary central incisors. Molar posts longer than 7 mm have an increased chance of perforations and therefore should be avoided even when using instruments of an appropriate diameter. Endodontics, Ingle
  • 90. Endodontics, Ingle Can Gutta- Percha Be Removed Immediately after Endodontic Treatment and a Post Space Prepared?  Adequately condensed gutta- percha can be safely removed immediately after endodontic treatment. Endodontics, Ingle  Both rotary instruments and hot hand instruments can be safely used to remove adequately condensed gutta-percha when 5 mm is retained apically. What Instruments Remove Gutta-Percha Without Disturbing the Apical Seal?
  • 91.  Following endodontic treatment, post space preparation should be performed and a post definitively cemented as soon as possible: the same day for a prefabricated post, and as soon as possible for a cus- tom-fabricated post and core. The prepared tooth should then be restored with a well-fitting provisional restoration (good marginal seal and occlusion) fol- lowed by cementation of the definitive crown in as short a time as possible. Endodontics, Ingle Does the Use of a Cervical Ferrule that Engages Tooth Structure Help Prevent Tooth Fracture? Endodontics, Ingle
  • 92.  Differences of opinion exist regarding the effectiveness of ferrules in preventing tooth fracture. Ferrules have been tested when they are part of the core and also when the ferrule is created by the overlying crown engaging tooth structure. Most of the data indicate that a ferrule created by the crown encompassing tooth structure is more effective than a ferrule that is part of the post and core Endodontics, Ingle Does the Use of a Cervical Ferrule that Engages Tooth Structure Help Prevent Tooth Fracture? Endodontics, Ingle
  • 94.  Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Fibre (UHMWPE) is one of the most versatile materials that have been introduced in dentistry.  it is highly aesthetic compared to cast metal as it is tooth colored secondly, it has high flexibility, is thin as well as strong and is being used to strengthen dental composite in large restorations.  The elastic modulus of these posts is similar to that of dentin and can be bonded to both dentin and core material which improves the distribution of forces along tooth roots which further contributes to the tooth-restoration reinforcement.
  • 95.  Other advantages include ease of manipulation and reduction in microleakage due to better bonding capacity.  cyclic loading on loss of retention was significantly lesser in custom fabricated Ribbond posts than compared to metal and glass fibre posts
  • 96.  Very strong and virtually unbreakable  Elasticity similar to dentin  Dissipates occlusal stress  Non-corrosive and biocompatible  Multi-axially arranged fibers  Resistant to bending and torsion forces
  • 97.  The use of biological posts made from natural, extracted teeth represents a feasible option for strengthening root canals, thus presenting the potential advantages such as: (1) Does not promote undue stress on dentinal walls (2) preserves the internal dentin walls of the root canal (3) presents total biocompatibility and adapts to conduct configuration, favoring greater tooth strength and greater retention of these posts as compared to prefabricated posts (4) presents resilience comparable to the original tooth (5) offers excellent adhesion to the tooth structure and composite resin at a low cost.
  • 99. POST SPACE PREPARATION  S e l e c t i o n o f tooth  R e m o v a l o f g u t t a p e r c h a  E n l a r g e m e n t o f t h e c a n a l  I m p r e s s i o n :  Direct technique  Indirect technique  I n v e s t m e n t a n d c a s t i n g  C e m e n t a t i o n
  • 100. 1. ROOT SELECTION IN CASE OF MULTIROOTED TEETH PREMOLARS  When posts and cores are needed in premolars, posts are best placed in the palatal root of the maxillary premolar and the straightest root of the mandibular premolar. The buccal root could be prepared to a depth of 1 to 2 mm and to serve as an antirotational lock, if needed.
  • 101. MOLARS  When posts and cores are needed in molars, posts are best placed in roots that have the greatest dentin thickness and the smallest developmental root depressions.  Maxillary molars : palatal roots  Mandibular molars :distal roots  The facial roots of maxillary molars and the mesial root of mandibular molars should be avoided if at all possible. If these roots must be used, then the post length should be short (3 to 4 mm) and a small-diameter instrument should be used (no larger than a No. 2 Peeso instrument that is 1.0 mm in diameter).
  • 102. 2. GUTTA PERCHA REMOVAL Three methods have been advocated for the removal of gutta-percha during preparation of a post space: 1. Chemical (oil of eucalyptus, oil of turpentine, and chloroform), 2. Thermal (electrical or heated instruments), and 3. Mechanical (Gates Glidden drills, Peeso reamers, etc.).  The chemical removal of gutta-percha for post space preparation is not utilized for specific reasons (microleakage, inability to control removal)  However, thermal and mechanical techniques or a combination of both are routinely used.
  • 103.  Dentists often use mechanical preparation techniques for post spaces because it is faster. The thermal method of removing gutta- percha using heat pluggers is safer but more time-consuming.  When mechanical preparation is preferred, it has been established that Gates-Glidden drills and Peeso reamers used on low speed are the safest instruments.  The provision of a longer post that preserves maximum root dentine and 4-5 mm of gutta percha apical seal, combined with extra- coronal support offers the best prognosis.  A post length of 7.0-8.0 mm is frequently stated as a typical guideline.
  • 104. REMOVAL WITH A HEATED ENDODONTIC CONDENSER  In this method a heated endodontic plugger or an electronic device is used to remove the gutta-percha.  This method is commonly used when gutta- percha is to be removed right after obturation as there are minimal chances of disturbing the apical seal. TECHNIQUE:  Apply rubber dam to prevent aspiration of instrument.  Select an endodontic condenser large enough to hold heat well but not so large that it binds against the canal walls.  The instrument is heated till it is red hot, inserted into the gutta-percha and is quickly withdrawn.  This sears off the gutta-percha.
  • 105. REMOVAL WITH ROTARY INSTRUMENTS  GG drills and Peeso Remaers are most often used. PREPARATION OF CORONAL TOOTH STRUCTURE POST SPACE PREPARATION CUSTOM CAST POST FABRICATION 1. DIRECT METHOD 2. INDIRECT METHOD
  • 106. PREPARATION OF CORONAL TOOTH STRUCTURE  Ignore any missing tooth structure and prepare the remaining tooth as though it was undamaged.  The facial surface (in anteriors) should be adequately reduced for good esthetics.  Remove all undercuts that will prevent removal of pattern.  Preserve as much tooth structure as possible.  Prepare the finish line at least 2mm gingival to the core. This establishes the ferrule.
  • 107.  For custom-made post and core restorations, place a contra bevel with a flame-shaped diamond at the junction of the core and tooth structure.  The bevel provides a metal collar around the occlusal circumference of the preparation (in addition to the ferrule) in bracing the tooth against fracture.  It also provides a vertical stop to prevent over- seating and wedging effect of the post.  Complete the preparations by eliminating sharp angles and establishing a smooth finish line.
  • 108. DIRECT TECHNIQUE  Trim a 14-gauge solid plastic sprue so that it slides easily into the canal to the apical end of the post preparation without binding.  Cut a small notch on the facial portion to aid in orientation during subsequent steps.  Mix acrylic resin monomer and polymer to a runny consistency.  Lubricate canal with petroleum or any other lubricating agent, on cotton wrapped on a Peeso reamer.  Fill the orifice of the canal as full as possible with acrylic resin applied with a plastic filling instrument.  Alternatively: – In the doughy stage, roll the resin into a thin cylinder, introduce it in the canal and push it to place with the monomer-softened sprue. POST FABRICATION
  • 109.  Seat the monomer coated sprue completely into the canal.  Make sure the external bevel is completely covered with resin at this time. Trying to cover it later may disturb the fit of the post. When acrylic resin becomes tough and doughy, pump the pattern in and out to insure that it will not lock into undercuts.  As the resin polymerizes, remove post from canal and make sure it extends till the apical end.  If required, additional resin can be placed at the apical end and the post is reseated and removed. Any voids can be filled with soft dead wax e.g. utilizing wax Reinsert and remove to ensure smooth withdrawal.  Slightly overbuild the core and allow it to fully polymerize.  Shape the core with carbide finishing burs.  Correct any small defects with wax
  • 110.  A direct pattern can also be made using inlay wax in a similar manner.  Add more resin or wax to form the core.  Shape it in the form of the final preparation.
  • 111. Orthodontic wire is bent to form a J-shape It is inserted into the canal and the fit is verified Coat is wired with adhesive and the canal is lubricated Canal, with the seated wire, is injected with elastomeric impression material Some of the impression material is syringed around the teeth and impression is taken INDIRECT PROCEDURE
  • 112. Cast is poured In the lab a plastic post is selected and it is extended to the full depth using impression as a guide Stine cast is lubricated, and inlay wax is added in increments on post Post pattern is fabricated followed by core fabrication and shaping Casting of the pattern is done
  • 113. INVESTING AND CASTING  The post-core pattern is sprued on the incisal or occlusal end.  1.0 to 2.0cc of extra water is added to the investment and a liner is omitted to increase the casting shrinkage.  This results in a slightly smaller post that does not bind in the canal, and it also provides space for the cement.  A tight fit may cause root fracture.  When resin is used, the pattern should remain for 30 minutes longer in the burnout oven to ensure complete elimination of the resin.  The final post, core and crown should be fabricated as soon as possible, because microleakage can contaminate the post space and endodontic fill.
  • 114. TRY IN  Check the fit of the post-core in the tooth by seating it with light pressure.  If it binds in canal or will not seat completely, air abrade the post and reinsert it in the canal.  The core portion of the casting should be polished.  If required, a vertical groove, from apical end to contrabevel, can be cut in the post to provide an escape vent for the cement.  The canal should be cleaned with a cavity cleaner to remove lubricant / temporary cement which may inhibit set of resin cements and decrease retention.
  • 115. CEMENTATION  Cements are best introduced into the canal with a lentulo- spiral and the post also coated with cement. The most commonly used dental cements—  zinc phosphate,  polycarboxylate,  glass ionomer cement,  resin-based composite  hybrid of resin and ionomer cements  zinc phosphate has had the longest history of success.  In the case of an endodontic failure, a metal post that is cemented in the canal space with zinc phosphate is easier to remove and has a lower risk of root fracture compared with a metal post that is bonded strongly with a resin-based composite cement in the root canal space.  Resin-based composite, on the other hand, is becoming increasingly popular because of its potential to bond todentin
  • 116. Any residual gutta-percha and root canal sealer must be removed from the dentinal walls to ensure proper bonding of resin to dentin Removal of the demineralized collagen layer using a specific proteolytic agent such as sodium hypochlorite has been shown in an SEM study to improve the bonding of resin to the root canal wall owing to the penetration of resin tags into dentinal tubules along the wall. A lentulo spiral can be used to carry acid etchant into the post space, while a fine-tipped microapplicator can be used to coat the canal walls with bonding agent..
  • 117. Morgano and bracket : described some of the desirable features of a core material. They include:  Adequate compressive strength to resist intraoral forces  Sufficient flexural strength  Biocompatibility  Resistance to leakage of oral fluids at the core-to tooth interface  Ease of manipulation  Ability to bond to remaining tooth structure  Thermal coefficient of expansion and contraction similar to tooth structure  Dimensional stability  Minimal potential for water absorption  Inhibition of dental caries. PRINCIPLES OF CORE BUILD UP
  • 118.  Stability in wet environment  Ease of manipulation  Rapid, hard set for immediate crown preparation  Natural tooth color  High compressive strength  High tensile strength  High fracture toughness  Low plastic deformation  Inert (no corrosion)  Cariostatic properties  Biocompatibility  Inexpensiveness.
  • 119. CORE MATERIALS  Cast core  Amalgam  Composite  Glass ionomer cement
  • 120. CAST CORE  Core is an integral part of the post and it does not need mechanical means for retention to the post  Prevents dislodgment of core and crown from post  Sometimes, more structure is removed for space preparation to create path of withdrawal  Placing cast gold post and core, however, is an indirect procedure requiring two visits.
  • 121. AMALGAM  Widely used for the longest time.  Placing an amalgam core requires a prolonged setting time, making it difficult to prepare immediately after placement if a crown is the final restoration.  Requires additional pins to provide retention and resistance to rotation  The presence of mercury in amalgam, was also of concern  Esthetic problems with ceramic crowns and make gingiva look dark  No natural adhesive properties and needs adhesive system
  • 122. GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS  Lack adequate strength and fracture toughness  Not to be used in teeth with extensive loss of structure  Soluble and sensitive to moisture
  • 123. COMPOSITE  Resin-based composite offers an esthetically pleasing material especially in the anterior section under an all- porcelain restoration.  Most widely accepted and used  Advantages:  Good bonding for retention  High tensile strength  Tooth can be prepared right after polymerization  Esthetic  Fracture resistance comparable to amalgam  It has good strength characteristics and low solubility.
  • 124.  Disadvantages:  Polymerization shrinkage causing gaps in areas where adhesion is the weakest  Adhesion to dentin on pulpal floor is not as strong  Strict isolation
  • 125. THE FINAL RESTORATION  Castings such as gold onlay, gold crowns, metal- ceramic crowns, and all- porcelain restorations with cuspal coverage are used routinely as standard and acceptable methods to restore posterior endodonticaly treated teeth.
  • 126. CAUSES OF FAILURE :  Vire classified failure of endodontically treated teeth are:  Prosthetic failures.  Periodontic failures.  Endodontic failures.  Of these, prosthetic failures occurred 59.4% of the times, thus emphasizing the need to properly restore endodontically treated teeth to increase their longevity.
  • 127.  For post and core restorations, failure rates between 7% and 15% have been reported in the literature (Torbjorner).  The main factors that make endodontically treated teeth more disposed to technical failure are:  Root fracture: Thin-walled weakened roots unable to withstand high stress.  Dislodgement of post: Reduced retentive surfaces resulting in high stress levels in the cement.  Fracture of post.  Caries  Periodontal disease.  Careful, case selection, adherence to biomechanical principles of post and core restoration, appropriate post selection and meticulous maintenance of oral hygiene on the part of the patient can prevent this.
  • 128. If certain basic principles are followed in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth, it is possible to achieve high levels of clinical success with most of the current restorative systems. These principles include: 1. Avoid bacterial contamination of the root-canal system 2. Provide cuspal coverage for posterior teeth 3. Preserve radicular and coronal tooth structure
  • 129. 4. Use posts with adequate strength in thin diameters 5. Provide adequate post length for retention 6. Maximize resistance form including an adequate ferrule 7. Use posts that are retrievable. The trend in clinical practice is toward fiber posts, and the literature is generally, although not overwhelmingly, favorable toward them. Their performance in vitro approximates that of metal posts and most studies agree that their failure mode is more favorable than with metal posts