SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Practice with PoP:
How to use
Publish or Perish
effectively?
Professor Anne-Wil Harzing
Middlesex University
www.harzing.com
Why citation analysis?:
Proof over promise
¡  Assessment of the quality of a publication might be (subconsciously)
influenced by the “promise” of:
¡  the journal in which it is published,
¡  the reputation of the author's affiliation,
¡  the sub-discipline (theoretical/modeling vs. applied, hard vs. soft)
¡  [Promise] Publication in a “triple-A” journal initially means that 3-4
academics thought your paper was a worthwhile contribution to the
field. But what if this paper is subsequently hardly ever cited?
¡  [Proof] Publication in a “C-journal” with 1,000+ citations means that 1,000
academics considered your paper to be a worthwhile contribution to
the field
¡  For more details and an application see:
¡  Harzing, A.W.; Mijnhardt, W. (2015) Proof over promise: Towards a more
inclusive ranking of Dutch academics in Economics & Business,
Scientometrics, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 727-749. Available online...
¡  Article’s main conclusion: Using citation metrics leads to more diverse
rankings (in terms of gender, affiliation, age, and discipline)
Which citation metrics?
What is a h-index,
why is hIa better?
¡  H-index increasingly seen as a convenient summary of
quantity & impact and is used in many research
assessments
¡  H-index of 10 means an academic has published 10
papers with at least 10 citations each
¡  hIa (Individual annualised h-index), i.e. h-index corrected
for career length and number of co-authors
¡  measures the average number of single-author
equivalent impactful publications an academic
publishes a year (usually well below 1.0)
¡  For details see:
¡  Harzing, A.W.; Alakangas, S.; Adams, D. (2014) hIa: An
individual annual h-index to accommodate disciplinary
and career length differences, Scientometrics, vol. 99,
no. 3, pp. 811-821. Available online…
Which data source?
ISI, Scopus or Google Scholar
¡  Sample of 148 Associate and Full Professors at the University of
Melbourne
¡  All main disciplines (Humanities, Social Sciences, Engineering, Sciences,
Life Sciences) were represented, 37 sub-disciplines
¡  Two professors (1 male, 1 female) and two associate profs (1 male, 1
female) in each sub-discipline (e.g. management, marketing,
accounting, economics)
¡  Citation metrics in WoS/ISI, Scopus and Google Scholar
¡  Collected citation data every 3 months for nearly 2 years
¡  Google Scholar data collected with Publish or Perish, WoS/ISI and
Scopus collected in the respective databases and imported into
Publish or Perish to calculate metrics
¡  The final conclusion: with appropriate metrics and data sources,
citation metrics can be applied in the Social Sciences
¡  ISI H-index: Life Sciences average lies 200% above Social Sciences
average
¡  Google Scholar hIa index: Life Sciences average lies 8% below Social
Sciences average
Comparing data sources across
disciplines: 148 academics (1)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Humanities Social
Sciences
Engineering Sciences Life Sciences
Web of Science 16 30 81 98 109
Scopus 21 34 103 101 123
Google Scholar 93 115 143 149 189
Averagenumberofpapers
Comparing data sources across
disciplines: 148 academics (2)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Humanities Social
Sciences
Engineering Sciences Life Sciences
Web of Science 61 591 897 2612 3139
Scopus 100 782 1132 2558 3313
Google Scholar 871 2604 1964 3984 4699
Averagenumberofcitations
Comparing data sources across
disciplines: 148 academics (3)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Web of Science Scopus Google Scholar
Humanities 3.5 4.3 12.3
Social Sciences 9.6 12.0 21.5
Engineering 13.5 15.6 20.8
Sciences 25.6 25.6 30.1
Life Sciences 27.1 28.3 33.4
Averageh-index
Comparing data sources across
disciplines: 148 academics (4)
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
Web of Science Scopus Google Scholar
Humanities 0.14 0.18 0.36
Social Sciences 0.32 0.42 0.66
Engineering 0.33 0.41 0.53
Sciences 0.44 0.45 0.57
Life Sciences 0.43 0.46 0.65
AveragehIaindex
Practical applications of
Publish or Perish
¡  How can I use Publish or Perish to (see links for
details in online version of the Publish or Perish Book)
¡  Track my own citations?
(http://www.harzing.com/popbook/ch3.htm)
¡  Present my case for confirmation or promotion?
(http://www.harzing.com/popbook/ch7.htm)
¡  Ensure I don’t miss key publications in the journal I am
submitting to?
(http://www.harzing.com/popbook/ch10_3.htm)
¡  Prepare for a meeting with an academic I don’t know?
(http://www.harzing.com/popbook/ch8_1.htm)
¡  Systematically store queries so I can run them again?
(http://www.harzing.com/popbook/ch6_2_3.htm)
Track your own citations
¡  Use Author impact Author search, e.g. “A Harzing”
¡  Review various measures of impact
¡  Many well-cited pubs (h-index) vs some highly-cited pubs (g-
index)
¡  Young versus older researchers (hc index measures current
impact)
¡  Single versus co-authored (hI norm corrects for multiple authors)
¡  Combined corrections for co-authorship and career stage (hIa)
¡  Which of your publications is a star?
¡  Review citations per year for each publication
¡  Shows you which of your research topics have more impact
¡  What type of publication is it?
Practice with PoP: How to use Publish or Perish Effectively
Publish or Perish for individuals
How to present your case?
¡  It is all about finding your “diamonds” and polishing them to
make them shine!
¡  Find your reference group
¡  Overall record: Average or range for academics at the same level in
your department or field of research (either nationally or worldwide)
¡  Individual papers: Publications in the same journal in the same year
¡  How does your article score within the journal? [Use Journal
Impact]
¡  One of the top-3/5/10(%) scorers in that year? (OS 2003) (see
screenshot)
¡  Play with this for the different data sources: 6th most cited in
Google Scholar, 3rd most cited in Scopus, 2nd most cited in
Thomson Reuters ISI
¡  The most cited paper in the year (JWB 2013) (see screenshot)
¡  Most cited single-authored paper (JWB 2002) (see screenshot)
¡  The first listed paper from your country/outside USA? (IJHRM 1995)
(see screenshot)
Practice with PoP: How to use Publish or Perish Effectively
Practice with PoP: How to use Publish or Perish Effectively
Journal submission
¡  Before submitting to a journal ensure you have not
missed any publications on your topic
¡  Use General citations
¡  Enter journal title in publication field
¡  Enter topic key words in “all of the words”, “any of
the words” or “the phrase” [words in that exact
order]
¡  If you get too many results, tick the box “title words
only” which searches only in the title (as opposed to
the entire article)
¡  You can combine searches by using OR (in capitals)
Practice with PoP: How to use Publish or Perish Effectively
Imagine: Meeting your
academic hero for dinner?
¡  You want to make a good impression
¡  You need to make sure you know a bit more about them than just the
specific paper you have used for your PhD
¡  You have been running late all day and only have 10 minutes left before
going to the restaurant, what do you do?
¡  Run a Publish or Perish search and sort the results:
¡  By citations, to learn about their most cited article (was it the one you
used in your PhD or not?)
¡  By citations per year to learn about any recent highly cited articles
¡  By year, to learn about their most recent interests (academics might long
be bored with their seminal contributions)
¡  By publication, to get an idea of the journals they have published in (any
journals you have published in too?; US/ European journals, academic/
practitioner journals, general/specialised journals, books)
¡  By author, to get a feel for whom they have worked with (anyone you
know?)
¡  An academic’s publication and citation record is the public
reflection of their “research story” and you can learn a lot from it
How to store your queries?
¡  PoP automatically stores any queries you run in the multi-query center
¡  Queries are stored in the “recent queries” folder
¡  They are moved to the “older queries” folder if they are >30 days old
¡  They are moved to the “trash” folder after 180 days
¡  “Query aging” can be adjusted in the preferences
¡  Functionality is very similar to Windows explorer
¡  You can create new folder and sub-folders to organise your queries
¡  Folders and queries can be renamed, copied, or dragged and dropped
¡  Stored queries can be run again at any time by selecting all the queries
you want to rerun and click look-up direct
¡  If you want to KEEP the old result (e.g. to check changes over time), FIRST
copy the query and then run the copied query again
¡  In the screenshot, note the strong increase in citations over the last 5 years
for highly cited AoM presidents DC Hambrick and DM Rousseau
¡  This is caused partly by expansion of Google Scholar coverage and partly
by natural increase of citations
¡  Hence DO NOT compare current day citation metrics to citation metrics
gathered years ago
Practice with PoP: How to use Publish or Perish Effectively
More
information?
Part 1: How to use Publish or Perish more effectively
Chapter 1: Introduction to citation analysis
Chapter 2: Introduction to Publish or Perish
Chapter 3: Author searches
Chapter 4: Journal searches
Chapter 5: General citation search queries
Chapter 6: Multi-query centre
Part 2: Day-to-day uses of Publish or Perish citation analysis
Chapter 7: Making your case for tenure or promotion
Chapter 8: How to evaluate other academics
Chapter 9: Tips for deans and other academic administrators
Chapter 10: Where to submit your paper?
Chapter 11: Conducting a literature review
Part 3: Advanced topics: Delving deeper into the world of citation
analysis
Chapter 12: Doing bibliometric research on authors & journals
Chapter 13: Evaluating Google Scholar
Chapter 14: Evaluating Thomson ISI Web of Science
Chapter 15: A Google Scholar h-index for journals
Chapter 16: Author citation analysis across disciplines
http://www.harzing.com/popbook_pbk.htm

More Related Content

PDF
Research ethics
PPT
Slides sus
PDF
Gymnasiearbete biologi 2021
PDF
Impact factor
PDF
Introduction to Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
PPT
Literature review
DOCX
Bhakti yoga
PDF
Gymnasiearbete biologi 2020
Research ethics
Slides sus
Gymnasiearbete biologi 2021
Impact factor
Introduction to Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Literature review
Bhakti yoga
Gymnasiearbete biologi 2020

What's hot (12)

PPTX
Literature review in research
PPTX
types of qualitative research
PPT
II Ethics with respect to Science & Research.ppt
PPT
Ethics in Research
PPTX
Impact factor of Journal as per Journal citation report, SNIP, SJR, IPP, Cite...
PPTX
Presentation on journal suggestion tool and journal finder
PDF
Research ethics
PPT
How To Write A Manuscript (2008)
PPT
BDent1 - Finding the Best Evidence
PPTX
Scientific Conduct (Part-1)on research.pptx
PDF
Impact Factor
PPT
Journal Metrics: The Impact Factor and Everything Else
Literature review in research
types of qualitative research
II Ethics with respect to Science & Research.ppt
Ethics in Research
Impact factor of Journal as per Journal citation report, SNIP, SJR, IPP, Cite...
Presentation on journal suggestion tool and journal finder
Research ethics
How To Write A Manuscript (2008)
BDent1 - Finding the Best Evidence
Scientific Conduct (Part-1)on research.pptx
Impact Factor
Journal Metrics: The Impact Factor and Everything Else
Ad

Viewers also liked (8)

PPTX
Citation Analysis: From Publication to Impact - Anne-Wil Harzing
PPTX
Bibliometrics: journals, articles, authors (v2)
PPTX
Citation Metrics: Established and Emerging Tools
PPT
Citation analysis for research evaluation
PPTX
Biblioteca, CVN y CRIS: la gestión del currículum del investigador en la Univ...
PPTX
Bibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRs
PPTX
Bibliometrics (2) author metrics
PPTX
Citation Metrics and Journal Rankings
Citation Analysis: From Publication to Impact - Anne-Wil Harzing
Bibliometrics: journals, articles, authors (v2)
Citation Metrics: Established and Emerging Tools
Citation analysis for research evaluation
Biblioteca, CVN y CRIS: la gestión del currículum del investigador en la Univ...
Bibliometrics (1) JIFs and JCRs
Bibliometrics (2) author metrics
Citation Metrics and Journal Rankings
Ad

Similar to Practice with PoP: How to use Publish or Perish Effectively (20)

PPTX
How to use Publish or Perish Effectively
PPTX
Scholarly Metrics Bootcamp USAIN 2014 Pre-conference workshop
PPTX
What can we learn from academic impact
PPTX
Citation metrics versus peer review: Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Sc...
PPTX
Using Bibliometrics Tools to Increase the visibility of your publications - C...
PPTX
Using Bibliometrics Tools to Increase the visibility of your publications
PPTX
Metrics vs peer review: Why metrics can (and should?) be applied in the Socia...
PPTX
Do metrics match peer review
PPTX
June 1st Library Presentation for CCTS Summer Fellowship
PPTX
Citation metrics across disciplines - Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Web of ...
PPT
Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences
PPT
Literature Reviews For The Health Sciences March 2010
PDF
How to Write a Great Research Paper, and Get it Accepted by a Good Journal Ja...
PPT
Library skills for clinical anatomy 9566 jan 2011
PDF
Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & context
PPT
What Faculty Need to Know About Open Access & Increasing Their Publishing Im...
DOCX
21 minutes agoTami Frazier RE Discussion - Week 3COLLAPSE.docx
PPTX
International publication of scientific research
PPTX
How to Conduct a Literature Review (ISRAPM 2014)
PDF
Analysis of Bibliometrics information for selecting the best field of study
How to use Publish or Perish Effectively
Scholarly Metrics Bootcamp USAIN 2014 Pre-conference workshop
What can we learn from academic impact
Citation metrics versus peer review: Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Sc...
Using Bibliometrics Tools to Increase the visibility of your publications - C...
Using Bibliometrics Tools to Increase the visibility of your publications
Metrics vs peer review: Why metrics can (and should?) be applied in the Socia...
Do metrics match peer review
June 1st Library Presentation for CCTS Summer Fellowship
Citation metrics across disciplines - Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Web of ...
Lit Reviews for the Health Sciences
Literature Reviews For The Health Sciences March 2010
How to Write a Great Research Paper, and Get it Accepted by a Good Journal Ja...
Library skills for clinical anatomy 9566 jan 2011
Research impact metrics for librarians: calculation & context
What Faculty Need to Know About Open Access & Increasing Their Publishing Im...
21 minutes agoTami Frazier RE Discussion - Week 3COLLAPSE.docx
International publication of scientific research
How to Conduct a Literature Review (ISRAPM 2014)
Analysis of Bibliometrics information for selecting the best field of study

More from Anne-Wil Harzing (11)

PPTX
Predatory Open Access Journals: Academic Beware!
PPTX
English as a lingua franca in academia
PPTX
It is sooo unfair: internal vs external promotion in academia
PPTX
Building your academic brand through engagement with social media
PPTX
Publish or Perish - Realising Google Scholar's potential to democratise citat...
PPTX
Benchmarking Research Performance
PPTX
Rigour vs relevance
PPTX
From Europe to Asia: Learning from new contexts
PPTX
Babel in Business: The role of language in international business
PDF
Citation analysis with Publish or Perish and Google Scholar
PDF
How to survive international mail surveys
Predatory Open Access Journals: Academic Beware!
English as a lingua franca in academia
It is sooo unfair: internal vs external promotion in academia
Building your academic brand through engagement with social media
Publish or Perish - Realising Google Scholar's potential to democratise citat...
Benchmarking Research Performance
Rigour vs relevance
From Europe to Asia: Learning from new contexts
Babel in Business: The role of language in international business
Citation analysis with Publish or Perish and Google Scholar
How to survive international mail surveys

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
The scientific heritage No 166 (166) (2025)
PPTX
The KM-GBF monitoring framework – status & key messages.pptx
PPT
POSITIONING IN OPERATION THEATRE ROOM.ppt
PPTX
BIOMOLECULES PPT........................
PPTX
ANEMIA WITH LEUKOPENIA MDS 07_25.pptx htggtftgt fredrctvg
PDF
CAPERS-LRD-z9:AGas-enshroudedLittleRedDotHostingaBroad-lineActive GalacticNuc...
PDF
Cosmic Outliers: Low-spin Halos Explain the Abundance, Compactness, and Redsh...
PPTX
Taita Taveta Laboratory Technician Workshop Presentation.pptx
PDF
Warm, water-depleted rocky exoplanets with surfaceionic liquids: A proposed c...
PDF
Biophysics 2.pdffffffffffffffffffffffffff
PDF
Placing the Near-Earth Object Impact Probability in Context
PDF
ELS_Q1_Module-11_Formation-of-Rock-Layers_v2.pdf
PDF
HPLC-PPT.docx high performance liquid chromatography
PDF
Looking into the jet cone of the neutrino-associated very high-energy blazar ...
PDF
Formation of Supersonic Turbulence in the Primordial Star-forming Cloud
PPTX
2. Earth - The Living Planet earth and life
PPTX
famous lake in india and its disturibution and importance
PPTX
EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY.pptx
PDF
VARICELLA VACCINATION: A POTENTIAL STRATEGY FOR PREVENTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
PPTX
7. General Toxicologyfor clinical phrmacy.pptx
The scientific heritage No 166 (166) (2025)
The KM-GBF monitoring framework – status & key messages.pptx
POSITIONING IN OPERATION THEATRE ROOM.ppt
BIOMOLECULES PPT........................
ANEMIA WITH LEUKOPENIA MDS 07_25.pptx htggtftgt fredrctvg
CAPERS-LRD-z9:AGas-enshroudedLittleRedDotHostingaBroad-lineActive GalacticNuc...
Cosmic Outliers: Low-spin Halos Explain the Abundance, Compactness, and Redsh...
Taita Taveta Laboratory Technician Workshop Presentation.pptx
Warm, water-depleted rocky exoplanets with surfaceionic liquids: A proposed c...
Biophysics 2.pdffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Placing the Near-Earth Object Impact Probability in Context
ELS_Q1_Module-11_Formation-of-Rock-Layers_v2.pdf
HPLC-PPT.docx high performance liquid chromatography
Looking into the jet cone of the neutrino-associated very high-energy blazar ...
Formation of Supersonic Turbulence in the Primordial Star-forming Cloud
2. Earth - The Living Planet earth and life
famous lake in india and its disturibution and importance
EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY.pptx
VARICELLA VACCINATION: A POTENTIAL STRATEGY FOR PREVENTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
7. General Toxicologyfor clinical phrmacy.pptx

Practice with PoP: How to use Publish or Perish Effectively

  • 1. Practice with PoP: How to use Publish or Perish effectively? Professor Anne-Wil Harzing Middlesex University www.harzing.com
  • 2. Why citation analysis?: Proof over promise ¡  Assessment of the quality of a publication might be (subconsciously) influenced by the “promise” of: ¡  the journal in which it is published, ¡  the reputation of the author's affiliation, ¡  the sub-discipline (theoretical/modeling vs. applied, hard vs. soft) ¡  [Promise] Publication in a “triple-A” journal initially means that 3-4 academics thought your paper was a worthwhile contribution to the field. But what if this paper is subsequently hardly ever cited? ¡  [Proof] Publication in a “C-journal” with 1,000+ citations means that 1,000 academics considered your paper to be a worthwhile contribution to the field ¡  For more details and an application see: ¡  Harzing, A.W.; Mijnhardt, W. (2015) Proof over promise: Towards a more inclusive ranking of Dutch academics in Economics & Business, Scientometrics, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 727-749. Available online... ¡  Article’s main conclusion: Using citation metrics leads to more diverse rankings (in terms of gender, affiliation, age, and discipline)
  • 3. Which citation metrics? What is a h-index, why is hIa better? ¡  H-index increasingly seen as a convenient summary of quantity & impact and is used in many research assessments ¡  H-index of 10 means an academic has published 10 papers with at least 10 citations each ¡  hIa (Individual annualised h-index), i.e. h-index corrected for career length and number of co-authors ¡  measures the average number of single-author equivalent impactful publications an academic publishes a year (usually well below 1.0) ¡  For details see: ¡  Harzing, A.W.; Alakangas, S.; Adams, D. (2014) hIa: An individual annual h-index to accommodate disciplinary and career length differences, Scientometrics, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 811-821. Available online…
  • 4. Which data source? ISI, Scopus or Google Scholar ¡  Sample of 148 Associate and Full Professors at the University of Melbourne ¡  All main disciplines (Humanities, Social Sciences, Engineering, Sciences, Life Sciences) were represented, 37 sub-disciplines ¡  Two professors (1 male, 1 female) and two associate profs (1 male, 1 female) in each sub-discipline (e.g. management, marketing, accounting, economics) ¡  Citation metrics in WoS/ISI, Scopus and Google Scholar ¡  Collected citation data every 3 months for nearly 2 years ¡  Google Scholar data collected with Publish or Perish, WoS/ISI and Scopus collected in the respective databases and imported into Publish or Perish to calculate metrics ¡  The final conclusion: with appropriate metrics and data sources, citation metrics can be applied in the Social Sciences ¡  ISI H-index: Life Sciences average lies 200% above Social Sciences average ¡  Google Scholar hIa index: Life Sciences average lies 8% below Social Sciences average
  • 5. Comparing data sources across disciplines: 148 academics (1) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Humanities Social Sciences Engineering Sciences Life Sciences Web of Science 16 30 81 98 109 Scopus 21 34 103 101 123 Google Scholar 93 115 143 149 189 Averagenumberofpapers
  • 6. Comparing data sources across disciplines: 148 academics (2) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Humanities Social Sciences Engineering Sciences Life Sciences Web of Science 61 591 897 2612 3139 Scopus 100 782 1132 2558 3313 Google Scholar 871 2604 1964 3984 4699 Averagenumberofcitations
  • 7. Comparing data sources across disciplines: 148 academics (3) 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 Web of Science Scopus Google Scholar Humanities 3.5 4.3 12.3 Social Sciences 9.6 12.0 21.5 Engineering 13.5 15.6 20.8 Sciences 25.6 25.6 30.1 Life Sciences 27.1 28.3 33.4 Averageh-index
  • 8. Comparing data sources across disciplines: 148 academics (4) 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 Web of Science Scopus Google Scholar Humanities 0.14 0.18 0.36 Social Sciences 0.32 0.42 0.66 Engineering 0.33 0.41 0.53 Sciences 0.44 0.45 0.57 Life Sciences 0.43 0.46 0.65 AveragehIaindex
  • 9. Practical applications of Publish or Perish ¡  How can I use Publish or Perish to (see links for details in online version of the Publish or Perish Book) ¡  Track my own citations? (http://www.harzing.com/popbook/ch3.htm) ¡  Present my case for confirmation or promotion? (http://www.harzing.com/popbook/ch7.htm) ¡  Ensure I don’t miss key publications in the journal I am submitting to? (http://www.harzing.com/popbook/ch10_3.htm) ¡  Prepare for a meeting with an academic I don’t know? (http://www.harzing.com/popbook/ch8_1.htm) ¡  Systematically store queries so I can run them again? (http://www.harzing.com/popbook/ch6_2_3.htm)
  • 10. Track your own citations ¡  Use Author impact Author search, e.g. “A Harzing” ¡  Review various measures of impact ¡  Many well-cited pubs (h-index) vs some highly-cited pubs (g- index) ¡  Young versus older researchers (hc index measures current impact) ¡  Single versus co-authored (hI norm corrects for multiple authors) ¡  Combined corrections for co-authorship and career stage (hIa) ¡  Which of your publications is a star? ¡  Review citations per year for each publication ¡  Shows you which of your research topics have more impact ¡  What type of publication is it?
  • 12. Publish or Perish for individuals How to present your case? ¡  It is all about finding your “diamonds” and polishing them to make them shine! ¡  Find your reference group ¡  Overall record: Average or range for academics at the same level in your department or field of research (either nationally or worldwide) ¡  Individual papers: Publications in the same journal in the same year ¡  How does your article score within the journal? [Use Journal Impact] ¡  One of the top-3/5/10(%) scorers in that year? (OS 2003) (see screenshot) ¡  Play with this for the different data sources: 6th most cited in Google Scholar, 3rd most cited in Scopus, 2nd most cited in Thomson Reuters ISI ¡  The most cited paper in the year (JWB 2013) (see screenshot) ¡  Most cited single-authored paper (JWB 2002) (see screenshot) ¡  The first listed paper from your country/outside USA? (IJHRM 1995) (see screenshot)
  • 15. Journal submission ¡  Before submitting to a journal ensure you have not missed any publications on your topic ¡  Use General citations ¡  Enter journal title in publication field ¡  Enter topic key words in “all of the words”, “any of the words” or “the phrase” [words in that exact order] ¡  If you get too many results, tick the box “title words only” which searches only in the title (as opposed to the entire article) ¡  You can combine searches by using OR (in capitals)
  • 17. Imagine: Meeting your academic hero for dinner? ¡  You want to make a good impression ¡  You need to make sure you know a bit more about them than just the specific paper you have used for your PhD ¡  You have been running late all day and only have 10 minutes left before going to the restaurant, what do you do? ¡  Run a Publish or Perish search and sort the results: ¡  By citations, to learn about their most cited article (was it the one you used in your PhD or not?) ¡  By citations per year to learn about any recent highly cited articles ¡  By year, to learn about their most recent interests (academics might long be bored with their seminal contributions) ¡  By publication, to get an idea of the journals they have published in (any journals you have published in too?; US/ European journals, academic/ practitioner journals, general/specialised journals, books) ¡  By author, to get a feel for whom they have worked with (anyone you know?) ¡  An academic’s publication and citation record is the public reflection of their “research story” and you can learn a lot from it
  • 18. How to store your queries? ¡  PoP automatically stores any queries you run in the multi-query center ¡  Queries are stored in the “recent queries” folder ¡  They are moved to the “older queries” folder if they are >30 days old ¡  They are moved to the “trash” folder after 180 days ¡  “Query aging” can be adjusted in the preferences ¡  Functionality is very similar to Windows explorer ¡  You can create new folder and sub-folders to organise your queries ¡  Folders and queries can be renamed, copied, or dragged and dropped ¡  Stored queries can be run again at any time by selecting all the queries you want to rerun and click look-up direct ¡  If you want to KEEP the old result (e.g. to check changes over time), FIRST copy the query and then run the copied query again ¡  In the screenshot, note the strong increase in citations over the last 5 years for highly cited AoM presidents DC Hambrick and DM Rousseau ¡  This is caused partly by expansion of Google Scholar coverage and partly by natural increase of citations ¡  Hence DO NOT compare current day citation metrics to citation metrics gathered years ago
  • 20. More information? Part 1: How to use Publish or Perish more effectively Chapter 1: Introduction to citation analysis Chapter 2: Introduction to Publish or Perish Chapter 3: Author searches Chapter 4: Journal searches Chapter 5: General citation search queries Chapter 6: Multi-query centre Part 2: Day-to-day uses of Publish or Perish citation analysis Chapter 7: Making your case for tenure or promotion Chapter 8: How to evaluate other academics Chapter 9: Tips for deans and other academic administrators Chapter 10: Where to submit your paper? Chapter 11: Conducting a literature review Part 3: Advanced topics: Delving deeper into the world of citation analysis Chapter 12: Doing bibliometric research on authors & journals Chapter 13: Evaluating Google Scholar Chapter 14: Evaluating Thomson ISI Web of Science Chapter 15: A Google Scholar h-index for journals Chapter 16: Author citation analysis across disciplines http://www.harzing.com/popbook_pbk.htm