Problem-based learning for improving problem-solving and critical thinking skills: A case on probability theory course

Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)
Vol. 17, No. 4, November 2023, pp. 507~525
ISSN: 2089-9823 DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v17i4.20866  507
Journal homepage: http://edulearn.intelektual.org
Problem-based learning for improving problem-solving and
critical thinking skills: A case on probability theory course
Mathilda Susanti1,2
, Suyanto Suyanto3
, Jailani Jailani2
, Heri Retnawati2
1
Doctoral Program in Educational Sciences, Graduate School, Yogyakarta State University, Sleman, Indonesia
2
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, Sleman, Indonesia
3
Department of Economics Education, Faculty of Economics and Business, Yogyakarta State University, Sleman, Indonesia
Article Info ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received Mar 16, 2023
Revised Jul 31, 2023
Accepted Aug 04, 2023
Problem-based learning (PBL) has been widely applied as an alternative to
improve learning outcomes, but it is still little studied in the context of the
probability theory course. This study described how implementing the PBL
model improves students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills in
probability theory course and evaluates its quality. This design research
involved 58 undergraduate students and two probability theory course
lecturers from two universities in Indonesia as participants. Data collection
used observation to describe PBL implementation, then questionnaire and
pretest-posttest to evaluate the quality of the model. This study produced a
PBL model for the probability theory course which is implemented through
five steps: i) Orienting students on problems; ii) Organizing students to
study; iii) Assisting individual and group investigations; iv) Developing and
presenting work or solutions; and v) Analyzing and evaluating problem
solving processes. Lecturers and students consider that the implementation
of PBL is practical. PBL implementation can also improve students’
problem-solving skills and critical thinking in the probability theory course.
Thus, implementing PBL can be used as a solution to optimize learning
outcomes in the probability theory course.
Keywords:
Critical thinking
Design research
Probability theory
Problem solving
Problem-based learning
This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA license.
Corresponding Author:
Mathilda Susanti
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
Yogyakarta State University
Colombo Street No. 1, Sleman, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Email: mathilda@uny.ac.id
1. INTRODUCTION
Critical thinking and problem-solving are two essential skills in learning mathematics. Critical
thinking skills in learning mathematics are needed to solve mathematical problems rationally and make the
right decisions [1]–[3]. Research results have also reported that critical thinking skills are not only needed in
solving mathematical problems but also needed in various other knowledge disciplines [4], [5], including one
of them in detecting false information or hoax [6] which is a significant issue in today’s rapid development of
technology and communication media. As has been stated by many experts [7]–[12], critical thinking has
now been the primary goal of education. Not only in the field of education, but critical thinking is also
a necessary component in the work place [7], [9], [11], communication [9], even in terms of technology
utilization [9]. Critical thinking allows individuals to gain a more complex understanding of the
information they encounter and make good decisions and problem solving in real-world situations [7], [11].
Critical thinking also enables a person to make better decisions and judgments in complex situations,

 ISSN: 2089-9823
J Edu & Learn, Vol. 17, No. 4, November 2023: 507-525
508
reduce cognitive biases and involve heuristic thinking, and become an informed and actively participating
citizen [7].
Apart from critical thinking, problem-solving skills are also required in the context of education and
everyday life. Problem solving is vital for each learner because these skills have become one of the focuses in
learning mathematics [13]–[18]. From a global view, problem-solving skills can help individuals to
overcome problems in everyday life [15]. In addition, Özreçberoğlu and Çağanağa [15] added that
individuals with problem-solving skills have self-confidence, creativity, and become independent thinkers. In
mathematics education, problem solving in mathematics helps students have experience in solving problems
in everyday life by applying their mathematical knowledge and skills [14]. Several reasons why problem-
solving skills are important, as stated by Osman et al. [14], include: i) Problem-solving skills make students
have many choices to make decisions; ii) Problem solving helps students to reason in various aspects of life
practice; and iii) Through the problem solving process, students will use their skills to analyze, think of
solutions, determine causes, evaluate possible strategies or solutions to solve problems and determine the
most effective solutions. In addition, problem-solving skills, besides emphasizing cognitive aspects, also
emphasize affective aspects of the learning process [19]. Problem solving is also seen as the first step for
students in developing ideas to construct new knowledge and other mathematical skills [20].
Efforts to develop students’ critical thinking skills through the learning process are inseparable from
developing problem-solving skills. Compared to creative thinking, problem-solving skills have a closer
relationship with critical thinking skills [2]–[5]. Ling and Loh [21] report that the ability to think critically
has a very close relationship and is a significant predictor of the ability to recognize patterns (pattern
recognition). Recognizing patterns is one of the important skills needed in solving problems, especially
mathematics problems [22]. That is, if educators successfully carry out learning that develops students’
critical thinking, then educators also have the potential to be successful in developing problem-solving skills,
as has been reported by previous research results [23], [24]. One learning model that can be used to develop
students’ critical thinking skills and problem solving is problem-based learning (PBL) [25]. Some of the
advantages obtained through PBL such as students being actively involved in exploring their learning
experiences [25]–[27], instilling students the ability to think flexibly and become successful problem solvers
[27]–[29], and involves collaboration [25], [27]. Thus, PBL represents learner-centered learning through
meaningful activities for developing thinking skills and collaboration.
Yew dan Goh [25] state that PBL has been widely adapted to various educational fields and contexts
to promote critical thinking and problem solving in authentic learning situations. Furthermore, Gijbels et al.
[29] underlined that PBL has implications for educational practice in higher education level that involve
inter-subject and inter-disciplinary influences. This indicates that research on PBL is not only relevant for the
elementary education level [30]–[32] and secondary [33]–[36], but has also been widely applied at the higher
education level [37]–[42]. This study focuses on the implementation of PBL at the higher education level.
The implementation of PBL at the higher education level which focuses on developing critical thinking and
problem solving has also been extensively researched. Cahyono et al. [38] investigated the effect of PBL
supported by scaffolding on critical thinking in prospective teacher. The implementation of PBL in this study
was carried out in an algebraic structure course. Evendi et al. [37] investigated the effect of PBL on students’
critical thinking in terms of cognitive style. In this study, PBL was implemented online in general
mathematics courses for undergraduate students. Several studies focus on problem solving, for example,
Klegeris and Hurren [43] investigated the impact of PBL in a large classroom setting on the problem-solving
skills of undergraduate biochemistry students at a university in Canada. Kadir et al. [44] investigated the
effect of implementing PBL on the problem-solving skills of undergraduate business students at a university
in Malaysia. PBL in this study is implemented in practical communication courses for fourteen weeks. Most
recently, Kök and Duman [45] investigated the effect of PBL implementation on problem-solving skills in
learning English. The implementation of PBL in this study involved 46 undergraduate students from the
school of foreign languages at one of the state universities in Turkey. Existing studies show that PBL has
become one of the strategies for developing critical thinking and problem solving in various disciplines for
higher education.
Although PBL has been widely used to develop students’ critical thinking and problem-solving
skills at the higher education level, it is still rare to find studies that reveal how PBL is implemented in
probability theory course. This study therefore seeks to fill that gap. In addition, studies that attempt to
investigate efforts to improve problem-solving and critical thinking skills in probability theory courses still
need to be found. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to improving the quality of learning
and student learning outcomes in probability theory courses. Thus, this study aims to describe the
implementation of PBL to improve students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills in probability theory
courses and evaluate its practicality and effectiveness.

J Edu & Learn ISSN: 2089-9823 
Problem-based learning for improving problem-solving and critical thinking skills ... (Mathilda Susanti)
509
2. RESEARCH METHOD
This study was conducted as design research [46], [47]. The focus of this study is to describe the
excellent practice of PBL in probability theory courses as an effort to improve students’ problem-solving and
critical thinking skills. The implementation of PBL in probability theory courses refers to the model that has
been developed as shown in Figure 1. In addition, this study also evaluates the practicality and impact of the
model in probability theory courses. The practicality of implementing the PBL model in probability theory
courses is evaluated based on the assessments of user lecturers and students. The impact of implementing the
PBL model is seen in the improvement of students’ problem-solving skills and critical thinking in probability
theory courses.
2.1. Participant
The implementation of PBL in this study involved two lecturers and 58 students from two
undergraduate mathematics education study programs in Indonesia. In this study, the two lecturers acted as
teachers. The two lecturers taught probability theory courses at their respective universities. One lecturer
(lecturer A) comes from a state university and the other (lecturer B) from a private university. Students are
divided into three classes, which are two classes at a state university (class A, n=24; and class B, n=18.) and
one class at a private university (class C, n=16). When this research was conducted, all students as
participants were contracting for probability theory courses at their respective universities. In this study,
lecturer A implemented PBL in classes A and B while lecturer B in class C. Even though there were
differences in the lecturers who taught, all classes received the same treatment.
2.2. Research procedure
2.2.1. Designing a model
This research begins by designing a PBL model for probability theory course. The PBL model in
probability theory course is developed based on the constructivism paradigm. This model was developed to
improve students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills in probability theory course. The components
contained in the model include syntax or lecture steps, social system, principles of reaction, support system,
and instruction and nurturant effects as presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1. The model of problem-based probability theory course

 ISSN: 2089-9823
510
In the PBL model in probability theory course, the lectures’ success or failure is determined by the
problems that will be given to students. Thus, the problem is the core of the model. The design of the
problem in the probability theory course model is carried out by noticing the characteristics, context,
environment, and learning resources. The problems selected in the developed model consider several matters:
i) The suitability of the problem with the probability theory subject; ii) The suitability of the problem with
real world situations; iii) Variations in complexity level of the problem; iv) The relationship between the
problem and other disciplines; v) Possible alternative solutions to the problem; and vi) The relationship
between the problem and the concepts that have been studied. Furthermore, the problem context proposed in
the model considers the following: i) The problem context is ill-structured; ii) The context of the problem
motivates and raises students’ curiosity to find solutions to problems; and iii) The problem context has
novelty. Besides that, in designing the problems in the model also consider matters related to the environment
and learning resources, including: i) The problems presented must stimulate students to collaborate,
discover, and group discussions and ii) The problems presented require a variety of relevant learning
resources to find solutions.
2.2.2. Model validation
Six experts then validated the design of the model: one expert in mathematics, three experts in
mathematics education, and two experts in mathematics learning assessment. The model validation stage is
carried out in three stages. First, the researcher asked the validator to provide qualitative suggestions
according to his expertise to improve the developed model. Second, revise the model according to
suggestions from all validators. After revision, the draft model is then submitted back to the validator. Third,
asking the validator to provide a quantitative assessment based on aspects of the model component
assessment. At this stage the expert can still provide input if it is found that there are still parts in the model
that need to be revised. The results of the validation of the PBL model in probability theory course by six
experts are presented in Table 1. Based on the expert’s assessment the developed model was declared valid
and practical to be implemented in probability theory course.
Table 1. Validation results of the PBL model in probability theory course by experts
Model components assessed
Validator assessment
results Mean
1 2 3 4 5 6
Supporting theory 24 4.90 25 25 25 25 4.90
Syntax 5 4.83 5 5 5 4 4.83
Social system 29 4.81 30 30 30 29 4.81
Principles of reaction 12 4.56 14 15 15 14 4.56
Support system 16 4.63 19 20 20 19 4.63
Instruction and nurturant effect 14 4.72 15 15 15 14 4.72
Implementation guidelines 15 4.83 15 15 15 15 4.83
Total 115 106 123 125 125 120
Mean 119
Category Very good
2.2.3. Model implementation
Implementing the model in probability theory course is guided by a mathematics education lecturer
with experience teaching probability theory courses. In this study, two lecturers became instructors in
probability theory course. Because this study involved students from three different classes, one of the
lecturers became an instructor in two different classes. So that the lecturers have the same perception, the
researchers conducted informal discussions with them to provide technical explanations regarding the
implementation of the model in class. Researchers have also prepared supporting documents for model
implementation, such as lecture material summaries, learning scenarios, student worksheets, pretest, and
posttest. Lecturers are allowed to study these documents. Researchers also provide opportunities for lecturers
to ask questions that are considered unclear from these documents.
Due to the pandemic, model implementation is done online using the Zoom meeting platform.
Researchers use the breakout rooms facility on the Zoom application for group discussion activities. Each
group discusses in their respective rooms, and the lecturer is assisted by researchers and observers who can
monitor the discussion activities of each group in turn. The implementation of the PBL model for probability
theory course was carried out in six meetings with different topics, they are combinatorics; probability,
probability properties, conditional probability, total probability and Bayes’ theorem; random variables and
discrete random variables distribution; random variables and continuous random variables distribution; as

511
well as the expected value and its properties. However, before implementation, each class was given a pretest
and after six implementations, all classes were given a posttest. During implementation, three observers
assisted the researcher in monitoring the learning activities. All learning activities for six meetings are
recorded live via Zoom meeting.
2.3. Data collection
Data collection in this study was using observation, questionnaires, and tests. Observations were
done to monitor the implementation of the learning stages and activities carried out by instructors and
students during lectures. Observations were carried out by researchers and assisted by three observers,
namely graduates of the mathematics education master’s degree. The researcher trained the three observers to
make observations and record important and unique points that occurred during the course. Field notes from
all observers will be confirmed with the results of lecture recordings so that comprehensive descriptive data
is obtained.
In this study, a questionnaire was used to capture the perceptions of user lecturers and students
regarding the practicality of implementing the PBL model in probability theory course. This study used a
5-point Likert scale: 1=very poor, 2=poor, 3=acceptable, 4=good, and 5=very good. The 10 indicators are
measured through the lecturer’s questionnaire: i) Ease of implementing learning syntax; ii) Smooth running
implementation of learning; iii) The accuracy of time allocation; iv) Achievement of lecture objectives;
v) Student interest in attending lectures; vi) Student motivation to learn; vii) Student activity in asking
questions; viii) Student activity in group discussions; ix) Student activity in completing worksheet;
and x) Students’ self-regulation in constructing knowledge. For student questionnaires, the indicators used to
measure the practicality of model implementation include: i) Enthusiasm for learning; ii) Ease of
participating in learning activities; iii) Ease of understanding concepts/materials; iv) The usefulness of each
learning step; v) Development of problem-solving skills; and vi) Development of critical thinking skills.
Before being used, both questionnaires had been validated by four experts (one mathematician, two
mathematics education experts, and one mathematics education assessment expert). Feedback from experts is
used to revise the questionnaire before it is used in data collection.
The test evaluates the effectiveness of PBL implementation in probability theory course. In this
study, the test consisted of a pretest and a posttest. Pretest and posttest measure the same indicators related to
students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills. The pretest and posttest each consist of 9-item
descriptions. Four items measure problem-solving skills, and five measure critical thinking skills. The pretest
and posttest instrument grids for measuring problem-solving skills are presented in Table 2, and critical
thinking is presented in Table 3. Before being used, the pretest and posttest instruments were validated by
four experts (one mathematician, two mathematics education experts, and one mathematics education
assessment expert). Feedback from experts is used to improve the test before it is used in data collection.
Table 2. The blueprint test of problem-solving skills
Learning content Indicator
Probability and its properties Given problems in everyday contexts related to probability properties, students can solve them
correctly
Conditional probability Given problems in everyday contexts related to conditional probability properties, students can
solve them correctly
Continuous random variables Given a function for the domain of a continuous random variable, students can correctly prove
that the function is a probability density function
Expected value Given problems in everyday contexts related to expected values (calculating the mean and
variance), students can solve them correctly
Table 3. The blueprint test of critical thinking skills
Learning content Indicator
Combinatorics Ask alternative questions
Probability and its properties Planning an action or experiment
Discrete random variables Formulate hypotheses and inferences
Continuous random variables Evaluate the truth of an information
Expected value Decide what to believe or do
2.4. Data analysis
Data analysis to describe the steps of PBL implementation in probability theory course was carried
out retrospectively with reference to the phases in design research [47]. In the retrospective analysis, the
researcher used the learning syntax of the model as a guide for the analysis. First, the analysis is focused on

 ISSN: 2089-9823
512
examining whether implementing the PBL model in probability theory course is in accordance with the
learning design. This analysis utilizes the results of the recording of each meeting. Second, the results of field
observations are compared with each learning activity’s syntax and objectives. This analysis is carried out to
determine how effective the activities are and how students gain an understanding of the concepts being
studied. Furthermore, the actual learning process is compared with the predicted learning process in the
developed model. The results of the interaction analysis between learning design and empirical observations
serve as a basis for developing instructional theory. After retrospective analysis, the initial learning design
was adjusted to get a new learning design.
This study conducted a descriptive analysis to evaluate the practicality and effectiveness of PBL
implementation in probability theory course. Descriptive statistics are used to analyze quantitative data from
lecturer and student questionnaires. The results of this data analysis are used to describe the level of
practicality of PBL implementation in probability theory course. In this study, the implementation of PBL in
probability theory course was declared practical if the results of the lecturer’s assessment were in the
minimum good category (M≥98.58) and the results of student assessments were in the minimal good
category (M≥50). Descriptive statistics are also used to analyze pretest and posttest data. After obtaining the
data description (such as M and SD) of students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills, researchers will
analyze the increase in the average score of problem-solving skills and critical thinking after students attend
the course. In this study, the implementation of PBL in probability theory course was declared effective if
there was an increase in students’ problem solving and critical thinking skills.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This study focuses on describing how implementing the PBL model improves problem-solving and
critical thinking skills in the probability theory course and evaluates the practicality and effectiveness of the
model. First, authors describe how best practice PBL implementation is in probability theory course based on
the model syntax that has been designed. In this study, lectures were conducted online using Zoom platform.
Next, authors focus on presenting the practicality and effectiveness assessment results from implementing the
PBL model in probability theory course.
3.1. PBL implementation in probability theory course
In this study, the implementation of PBL in probability theory course was carried out through five
steps: i) Orienting students to problems; ii) Organizing students to study; iii) Assisting individual and group
investigations; iv) Developing and presenting works or solutions; and v) Analyze and evaluate the problem-
solving process. In general, each stage in the probability theory course with PBL model is designed to
facilitate students constructing their knowledge while simultaneously stimulating their problem-solving and
critical thinking skills improvement. An explanation regarding the steps for implementing PBL in probability
theory course is presented:
3.1.1. Step 1: Orient students to the problem
At this stage, the lecturer gives an apperception by conducting questions session to students to
explore and recall the concepts students have learned regarding the material to be studied later. The lecturer
will also convey the goals to be achieved in this course. At this stage, the lecturer will also briefly explain the
planned lecture activities to be carried out. If there are things that need to be discussed related to the
objectives and plans for lecture activities, the lecturer allows students to express their opinions. Furthermore,
the lecturer invites students to look at the problems presented on the worksheet. In this activity, students are
expected to be motivated and challenged to find solutions to these problems. An example of a problem in the
worksheet is presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2. An example of a problem given in worksheet

513
3.1.2. Step 2: Organize students for study
Learning activities at this stage started by creating small groups of 3-4 students. After the group is
formed, the lecturer conveys the learning scenario that will be carried out at this meeting. An example of a
learning scenario delivered by the lecturer is presented in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Learning scenario
Next, the lecturer explains the activities that students will carry out during group discussions as shown in
Figure 4. Because lectures are conducted online through the Zoom platform, group discussions are conducted
through breakout room feature.
Figure 4. The instruction for group discussion
After joining their respective groups, each student is allowed to re-examine the problems found in
the worksheet. In this activity, students are allowed to ask questions, either to the lecturer or fellow group
members, if there is information that has not been understood from the given problems. In this case, it needs
to be underlined that the questions posed by students are not related to solutions to problems but focus on
things that will be used as initial information for students to find solutions to problems. Thus, the lecturer will
only respond to student questions regarding what matters are known and ask about the problems, while the
lecturer does not explicitly respond to questions that lead directly to the final solution of the problems. The
following is an example of lecturer activity in responding to students’ questions. One of the results of
students’ work on a problem asked of the lecturer is shown in Figure 5.
“Is there any difficulties?” (Lecture)
“Can we write this problem (referring to Problem-1, Figure 2) like this, ma’am? (Referring to
Figure 5)” (Student 1)

 ISSN: 2089-9823
514
Figure 5. The result from the students’ initial discussion
“OK, you were already writing the S, that is good, very detailed. Now try to pay attention again to
what is X defined as?” (Lecturer)
“X is the number of probabilities, ma’am.” (Student 1)
“Try reading on it again, in the problems presented above. “Draw a function that states many fail
electronic components in the experiment above with an arrow diagram. Name the function X”. So, x
defined as?” (Lecturer)
“The function?” (Student 1)
“What kind of function?” (Lecturer)
“The number of electronic components that failed.” (Student 1)
“OK, the number of electronic components that failed. So, you have determined all the possible
outcomes of the experiment, right? You have written down the sample space there. My question is,
for the first sample point ‘BBB’, what is the value of x?” (Lecturer)
“The value of 𝑥 for ‘BBB’ is 0, ma’am.” (Student 1)
“What is the value of x? (Confirming the answer of student 1)” (Lecturer)
“0 (Answered confidently)” (Student 1)
“Why (is the value of x equal to) 0?” (Lecturer)
“Because no one is failed, ma’am.” (Student 1)
“OK, so because there is no fail... in the arrow diagram, in the S set, you should write down the
outcomes of S, BBB, then where do you map it to? Because the R here denotes the number of
components which?” (Lecturer)
“Fail.” (Student 1)
“Then, BBB is mapped to which number? 0, 1, 2, or 3?” (Lecturer)
“Should be 0, ma’am.” (Student 1)
“OK, so it is understandable right?” (Lecturer)
“Yes, ma’am.” (Student 1)

515
3.1.3. Step 3: Assist independent and group investigation
In this step, the lecturer instructed students to discuss in their respective groups. Group discussions
focused on finding strategies or devising plans to solve problems in the worksheet. During the discussion,
students were given the opportunity to gather various relevant learning resources in order to help find ideas to
find solutions to problems. In this activity, the lecturer acted as a facilitator where when group experienced
problems, the lecturer gave the group the opportunity to ask questions. Questions expected to arise from
students were not questions related to the final solution to the problem, but questions that led students to find
ideas that they would use to arrive at a solution to the problem. The following is an example of scaffolding
that the lecturer has given to help students find ideas to solve problems which in this case the problems are
presented in Figure 6. Meanwhile, Figure 7 shows an illustration that the lecture use to help students find
ideas to solve these problems.
“Ma’am, I want to ask. What does this problem mean? (Referring to Problem-2, Figure 6)”
(Student 1)
Figure 6. One of the problems in the worksheet that students need to solve through group discussions
“In the second problem (referring to Figure 6), it is known that there are events A (he won in the
first round) and B (he won in the second round), the probability of event A to occur and the
probability of event B to occur are also known, as well as the probability of intersection of two
events A and B is known. These probabilities can be determined by considering regions of Venn
diagram so that it can help us in figuring out how to determine the probability that he won at least
one round. He won at least one round means that he won in the first round only (A), he won in the
second round only (B), or he won in both rounds (A and B). Does that mean it’s OK if he wins in
both rounds?” (Lecturer)
“Yes.” (Student 1)
“That is OK ma’am.” (Student 2)
“So, try to present it (the existing problem) in a Venn diagram so that it will be clearer which event
is meant, including later the probability can be determined, that is all.” (Lecturer)
“Yes ma’am. Next, is the probability that he did not win (in both rounds) also be considered?”
(Student 1)
“Does your question refer to the third question, “he did not win in both rounds”?” (Lecturer)
“Yes ma’am.” (Student 1)
“OK. If he did not win in both rounds it means he did not win in round A, did not win in round B, or
did not win in rounds A and B.” (Lecturer)
“If so, does that count as a sample space?” (Student 1)
“Yes, that of course goes into the sample space as well. OK, now let us look at the following figure.”
(Lecturer)

 ISSN: 2089-9823
516
Figure 7. Illustrations that lecturers use to explain to students
“Take a look at the figure presented (referring to Figure 7). There are the probability of event A to
occur, the probability of event B to occur, the probability of at least one event to occur, and the
probability of event A and B to occur represented by regions of the Venn diagram. Please attempt to
associate them in terms of their probabilities.” (Lecturer)
“All right, ma’am, we will try it first.” (Student 1)
At this step, the guidance that the lecturer provides can be directed at individuals or groups,
depending on the discussion situation. If there are group members who seem passive, the lecturer needs to
approach the students and ask what the obstacles are. In this regard, the lecturer needs to identify the
obstacles and difficulties experienced by these students and help them to overcome existing obstacles and
difficulties as soon as possible through the right stimulus. The same thing can also be done by lecturers for
groups that experience problems and difficulties in the discussion process. The stimulus given by the lecturer
can be in the form of trigger questions that lead to what the group should do to find a solution to the problem
being discussed. However, the stimulus provided by the lecturer during the discussion process is dynamic,
meaning that it adapts to the situations and conditions that occur during the discussion process.
Through activities carried out at the step of assisting individual and group investigation, students are
encouraged to develop their problem-solving skills, especially those related to the application of the concepts
they have learned.
3.1.4. Step 4: Develop and present artifacts or solutions to the problems
The main activity at this step was presenting the results of the discussion of each group. In this
regard, each group representative was asked to present the results of their group discussion. In this
presentation, students not only reported the solutions to the problems obtained, but they also needed to report
important information contained in the problem, the formulation of the problem to be solved, the chosen plan
or strategy to obtain a solution to the problem, as well as the results of their work and conclusions obtained.
At this step, after the representatives of one of the groups have finished presenting the results of their group
discussions, the other groups were allowed to ask questions, provide feedback or objections to the results of
the presentation. During the question-and-answer activity, each member of the presenter group could respond
to questions or objections from other groups. When the presenter group had difficulty in responding to
questions from other groups, the lecturer provided stimulus through trigger questions to direct the presenter
group to be able to answer the questions. The activities carried out by students at the step can encourage them
to develop their critical thinking skills. The following is an example of a presentation of the results of one
group’s work in solving Problem-1 on worksheet 3A as presented in Figure 8 and the provision of stimulus
by the lecturer during class discussion.
Figure 8. One of the problems that students need to solve in worksheet 3A

517
The solution to Problem-1 as shown in Figure 8 presented by group 4 which is presented in Figures
9-11. The worksheet also contains critical thinking activities, in which students are asked to find other ways
to find solutions to problems. An example of the results of critical thinking activities presented by group 4 is
presented in Figure 10. Figure 11 presents an example of the conclusions a group came to after a problem-
solving activity.
Figure 9. Example of group discussion results
Figure 10. An example of a result of a critical thinking activity: Finding other ways to determine the solution
to a problem
Figure 11. An example of the conclusion a group made after working on the activity in worksheet 3A

 ISSN: 2089-9823
518
After group 4 finished their presentation, the lecturer invited other groups to provide feedback. The
following is a transcript of feedback by a member of another group (group 5).
“We welcome anyone who wants to comment (on what group 4 has presented).” (Lecturer)
“Actually, there is no difference in the end result, but to find a solution in the critical thinking part
(looking for another way to solve the problem) we use a different way.” (Student 1)
“Oh... OK, that means we get the same answer, namely 7/10, but the method used is different. Where
is the difference?” (Lecturer)
“During group discussions, for another method, we use the probability method with combinations,
because there is only one event, so we use combinations like that, ma’am.” (Student 1)
“OK, present your group’s work, please.” (Lecturer)
“OK ma’am.” (Student 1)
While waiting for group 5 to present the results of their presentation, the lecturer provided feedback for group
4’s presentation.
“OK, starting from the supposition (referring to Figure 7), here the original is supposed to be x.
This supposition can be more complete, i.e., suppose that X is the event that the original cellphone
was selected and Y is the event that the counterfeit cellphone was selected. Like that. Please for
group 4 (and all students), the supposition can be made even more detailed.” (Lecturer)
Furthermore, group 5 presented their work as shown in Figure 12.
Figure 12. Another way proposed by group 5
The feedback that the lecturer gave to the method proposed by group 5 is:
“OK. It says that the probability of choosing an original cellphone from brand B is represented by
the combination of seven choose one. Which cellphone is chosen for this case?” (Lecturer)
“The original cellphone from brand B.” (Student 1)
“Then, what brand of cellphone is chosen which is indicated by the combination of ten choose one?
The one chosen is brand B, isn’t it? Is this actually the same as the previous activity? (Referring to
previous problem solving).” (Lecturer)
“Hmm. That seems to be the same, ma’am.” (Student 1)
“All right. So, actually 7/10 can also be found in that way (referring to the method proposed by
group 5). Do you get it?” (Lecturer)

519
“Yes, I get it, ma’am.” (Student 1)
“OK. Now I return to what was presented by group 4. What way or method did group 4 use to solve
the existing problems?” (Lecturer)
“They used the method of conditional probability, ma’am.” (Student 4)
“That is right. They used the method of conditional probability and the result is the same, right?”
(Lecturer)
“Yes ma’am.” (Student 4)
3.1.5. Step 5: Analyze and evaluate problem solving processes
After the question-and-answer activity between the presenter group and other groups was over, the
lecturer gave appreciation for what had been presented by the presenter group. Furthermore, the lecturer
provides reinforcement and clarification to what the presenter group has explained and questions/responses
from other groups. The reinforcement and clarification from the lecturer were used as material for
improvement or correction if what the presenter group has explained was not optimal. If the explanation of
the presenter group has been optimal, it could be used as the final solution to the problem being discussed.
Afterwards, the lecturer gave the opportunity for students to ask questions if there was material or
things that they did not understand. If there are no more questions from students, the lecturer provides
reinforcement of the results of solving the problems that have been carried out by each group. In providing
reinforcement, the lecturer needs to focus on the main concepts that students should master after involving in
probability theory learning facilitated by applying PBL model. Furthermore, lecturers and students conclude
the material or concepts that have been studied. The process of drawing conclusions could also be used to
check the understanding of some students, especially for students who seem less active throughout the
learning process, of the material they just learned. Next, the lecturer provides follow-up in the form of giving
homework. The homework aimed to strengthen students’ understanding of the concepts they have learned.
Lastly, the lecturer informed students regarding the topics to be studied at the next meeting. Overall, the
activities carried out by students at the step of analyzing and evaluating the problem-solving process can train
and develop students’ critical thinking skills.
3.2. Practicality of PBL implementation in the probability theory course
After carrying out face-to-face learning in online mode for six meetings using the PBL model, two
user lecturers gave their assessment to the PBL model developed in this study. It was found that, in general,
they considered that the learning syntax of the learning model was easy (practical) to implement. The
assessment results of the two user lecturers are presented in Table 4. The table reveals that one aspect that
still needs to be optimized in the implementation of PBL in the probability theory course is the management
of time allocation.
Table 4. The results of user lecturers’ assessment on the practicality of PBL implementation in the
probability theory course
Aspects assessed
Assessment results
Lecturer 1 Lecturer 2
Ease of implementing learning syntax Very easy Easy
Smoothness of learning process Very good Good
Accuracy of time allocation Very good Acceptable
Attainment of learning objectives Very good Good
Interest of students to be involved in learning Very good Very good
Motivation of students to learn Very good Good
Activeness of students to ask questions Very good Good
Student activeness during group discussion Very good Very good
Student activeness in working on worksheets Very good Very good
Student independence in constructing knowledge Good Good
In addition to the assessment by user lecturers, the practicality of implementing PBL in the
probability theory course was also carried out by students. The results of the practicality assessment of PBL
implementation by students are presented in Table 5. Table 5 shows that in general students gave a positive
response to the implementation of PBL in the probability theory course. The average results of the
practicality assessment of PBL implementation by students are in the practical category. This indicates that

 ISSN: 2089-9823
520
students are able to follow each step of learning properly. In addition, students gave the highest rating on the
indicator of ease of participating in learning activities. This indicates that the learning steps of PBL in the
probability theory are easy for students to follow. However, students gave the lowest rating on the indicator
of ease of understanding the material or concepts being studied. This is understandable because students are
not too familiar with learning procedures that require them to be actively involved in constructing their
knowledge. In terms of the potential of PBL to support the development of students’ problem solving and
critical thinking skills in the probability theory course, students gave positive responses to these two aspects.
This shows that students believe that the implementation of PBL in the probability theory course can foster
their problem-solving and critical thinking skills.
Table 5. The results of practicality assessment of PBL implementation by students (n=58)
Assessment indicators Mean Min. Max. Indicator attainment *
Enthusiasm in learning 12.90 6 18 71.67%
Ease of following learning activities 7.48 3 9 83.12%
Ease of understanding concepts/learning materials 3.79 2 6 63.17%
Usefulness of each learning step 6.92 3 9 76.89%
Development of problem-solving skills 11.87 5 15 79.14%
Development of critical thinking skills 8.40 4 12 70.00%
Overall 51.79 23 69 75.06%
Interpretation Practical
Note. *: The attainment of each indicator is the percentage of the mean relative to the maximum
score of each indicator
3.3. Effectiveness of PBL implementation in the probability theory course
The effectiveness of PBL implementation in the probability theory course can be examined from the
increased score in problem-solving and critical thinking skills after the implementation of PBL. In this
regard, we describe the development of students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills by comparing
the conditions before and after they engaged in the probability theory course. Descriptions of students’
problem solving and critical thinking skills are presented in Table 6.
Table 6. Descriptive statistics of students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills before and after PBL
implementation (n=58)
Problem solving Critical thinking
M SD Min. Max. Ideal M SD Min. Max. Ideal
Pretest 2.90 1.66 0 7 12 1.10 1.36 0 6 18
Posttest 5.74 2.52 1 11 12 4.10 2.18 0 10 18
Gain +2.84 +3.00
Table 6 demonstrates an increase in the average score of students’ problem-solving and critical
thinking skills after implementing PBL in the probability theory course. Even though the average posttest
score is below the ideal maximum score, an increase in score from pretest to posttest indicates a positive
impact on the development of students’ problem-solving skills and critical thinking skills from the
implementation of PBL in the probability theory course. Thus, the implementation of PBL in the probability
theory course is quite effective in improving students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills.
3.4. Discussion
This study focuses on describing the implementation of PBL in the probability theory courses and
evaluating its practicality and effectiveness in terms of promoting problem-solving and critical thinking
skills. Our study reveals that PBL can be implemented well in the probability theory course. Similar to the
findings of previous studies [31], [41], [45], [48]–[50], in the probability theory lecture setting, the strength
of PBL is that it provides opportunities for students to construct knowledge related to the concepts being
studied. Knowledge that is constructed directly by students through problem solving procedures indirectly
encourages them to think critically [25], [45]. In addition, the knowledge that is constructed through student
involvement makes learning more meaningful for them [42], [48], [50]. The meaningfulness of this learning
contributes to increasing students’ conceptual understanding of the topics studied.
One of the keys to the successful implementation of PBL in opportunity theory lectures is the
provision of scaffolding. Scaffolding is needed when students experience obstacles in figuring out ideas to
solve problems. Several studies [32], [33], [51] have confirmed that scaffolding is required when

521
implementing PBL. The focus of scaffolding is to provide a stimulus – for example through trigger questions
and providing feedback – for students to generate ideas to solve problems, not get solutions to problems
directly. Scaffolding is situational, meaning that it is given only when there are groups which show no
progress during the discussion process. On the other hand, when there are other groups that are able to
independently generate ideas to solve problems, scaffolding is not needed.
Although previous studies have succeeded in developing and examining PBL-based instructional
designs [34], [37], [43], [48]–[50], [52], [53], the focus of these studies is not on the probability theory
course. In addition, although this study also develops a PBL-based instructional design, the novelty of the
findings of this study lies in the target of utilizing the results of the development, in which the resulting
instructional design is specifically designed to be implemented in the probability theory course.
Best practices related to PBL implementation in this study can be used as a reference for educators and
researchers to design varied and meaningful instructional designs for students in higher education. The
findings of this study can also be used as a guide for educators to improve students’ problem-solving and
critical thinking skills.
One aspect that needs to be evaluated in the development of instructional designs is practicality [54],
[55]. The findings of this study reveal that even though the implementation of PBL is considered as a new
thing in the probability theory course, educators and lecturers claim to be able to follow learning activities
easily. This indicates that PBL is practically applied to the probability theory course. The findings of this
study thus corroborate previous studies which show that PBL can be implemented well in various disciplines
and levels of education [34], [37], [48]–[50]. The fulfillment of the practical aspects of the PBL model in the
probability theory course demonstrates several things. First, learning steps can be easily understood and
implemented properly by lecturers and students. Second, the support system in the form of worksheets is
useful for facilitating student learning activities and can be used easily. Third, the instructional design
developed is relevant to the course objectives. Fourth, students were enthusiastic and actively involved in the
learning process showed by actively asking questions, discussing, working on worksheets, and even seeking
to construct knowledge independently.
This study also revealed that there was an increase in students’ problem-solving and critical thinking
skills after being actively involved in probability theory lectures that apply PBL. Even though there has been
an increase, it did not satisfy our expectations. This result thus fall short of our predictions and inconsistent
with the findings of previous studies which have succeeded in uncovering the effectiveness of PBL [35],
[38], [48]–[50]. However, this finding is consistent with the results of other studies reporting that PBL is not
sufficiently effective [56]–[58]. Several things are considered as possible causes that hinder the optimal
improvement of problem-solving and critical thinking skills in the probability theory course applying PBL.
First, students were not used to PBL. Jailani et al. [48] reported that one of the challenges in implementing
PBL is related to learning habits, where students who were accustomed to traditional learning tended to need
time to adapt to PBL. Dolmans et al. [57] suggest that when students are not used to PBL, it causes the group
discussion cannot work as it should. Given that group discussion is a crucial aspect in PBL, when it cannot
work properly, learning activities also cannot take place optimally. Thus, in order for PBL to be implemented
optimally, students’ habituation with PBL is needed.
The second thing is related to time allocation constraints, where students sometimes spent too much
time during group discussions. Constraints related to time allocation are one of the main obstacles in
implementing PBL [48], [56]. Thus, a sufficiently long duration of time is required so that all steps of
learning can be carried out. When one learning step takes too long, it can cause disruption to the next
learning step. It can even cause some of the learning activities that have been designed to be not carried out.
However, PBL is also not recommended to be carried out for too long because this can reduce students’
positive attitudes towards learning [59].
Third, students’ low mastery of the prerequisites to probability theory course such as differential and
integral calculus is thought to prevent them from achieving an optimal improvement in problem-solving and
critical thinking skills. In this study, it turned out that at one university the Integral Calculus course was
offered in the same semester as the probability theory course. Students should ideally have taken and passed
the integral calculus course before enrolling in the probability theory course. Hung [60] argues that mastery
of prerequisites is crucial in PBL. Prerequisites can be used to develop new knowledge related to the
interpretation and representation of problems [61]. Thus, to optimize the implementation of PBL in the
probability theory course, students need to be equipped with adequate mastery of the prerequisites to
probability theory course as well.
Fourth, the field trial of the implementation of the PBL model conducted online through the Zoom
platform contributed to the not optimal learning process in the probability theory course. Even though all
steps of learning could be carried out well, when conducting group discussions students needed quite a long
time to align perceptions and obtain solutions to the problems. Abdelkarim et al. [62] reported that one of the
weaknesses of PBL when implemented online is that students become more individualistic. This also

 ISSN: 2089-9823
522
happened in this study, where when group discussions were online, students with high academic abilities
dominated, while other students tended to be passive without attempting to contribute ideas or thoughts in
solving problems. This results in a gap in understanding between students with high and low abilities.
3.4.1. Study limitations and implications
This study has some limitations. First, because the field trial was carried out in the midst of the
COVID-19 pandemic, the field trial was carried out online. Even though efforts have been made to use a
blended learning system in one of the universities, the number of students who were willing to take face-to-
face in the classroom is very small – less than five students. Although the implementation of PBL in online
mode could still be carried out, some learning activities have become less than optimal, especially in terms of
monitoring student learning progress. Second, because the trial process was carried out online, there were
several technical problems experienced by students, such as internet network problems and computer
or laptop devices that experienced technical problems. Internet network constraints experienced by
students were generally caused by weather factors that cannot be predicted and anticipated by us. The
technical constraints that arose had an impact on the field trials which were not optimal, especially in terms
of time allocation.
The limitations encountered in this study indicate that PBL implementation in online mode is
challenging. Further studies are still needed to investigate and find the best solution to optimize PBL
implementation when it is carried out in online mode. In addition, considering that the implementation of
PBL in the probability theory course is something new, other studies are needed to investigate how to
implement PBL in offline mode. Future studies can also compare the effectiveness of PBL in online and
offline mode. Although this study was successful in providing initial indications that the implementation of
PBL can improve students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills in the probability theory course, the
effectiveness of the instructional design developed has not been tested in (quasi) experimental design. Thus,
we encourage researchers to conduct (quasi) experiments to investigate the effectiveness of PBL on students’
problem-solving and critical thinking skills, especially in the probability theory course. Future experiments
are also expected to consider other aspects such as gender differences, learning modes (online vs. offline),
and the level of student interest in learning. It is hoped that the results of these studies will further strengthen
the findings of this study so that PBL is truly tested as a solution to improve student learning outcomes in the
Probability theory course.
4. CONCLUSION
The implementation of PBL in the probability theory can be done through several steps of learning:
i) Familiarize students with problems, organize students to solve problems; ii) Guide individual and group
investigations; iii) Develop and present the results of problem solving; and iv) Analyze and evaluate problem
solving procedures and solutions. PBL implementation encourages students to be actively involved in
constructing knowledge and concepts on topics studied in the probability theory course. Lecturer skills in
providing scaffolding in the problem-solving process are an important key to successful PBL implementation
in the probability theory course. Apart from training problem-solving and critical thinking skills, the
implementation of PBL also encourages students to develop their collaboration and communication skills.
Both lecturers and students gave positive responses to the implementation of PBL in the probability theory
course. They feel that the designed learning steps are easy for lecturers to implement and for students to
follow. The findings of this study also reveal that the implementation of PBL can improve students’ problem-
solving and critical thinking skills in the probability theory course. However, the implementation of PBL in
online mode is very challenging and requires optimal preparation in terms of supporting devices and learning
contents. Based on best practices and the findings of this study, we recommend PBL to be adapted as a
variation of learning model to facilitate the probability theory course.
REFERENCES
[1] L. Verschaffel, S. Schukajlow, J. Star, and W. Van Dooren, “Word problems in mathematics education: a survey,” ZDM -
Mathematics Education, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4.
[2] K. Kereluik, P. Mishra, C. Fahnoe, and L. Terry, “What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century
learning,” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 127–140, Jun. 2013, doi:
10.1080/21532974.2013.10784716.
[3] B. Nawolska, “Unusual word problems and the development of critical thinking in early school students,” Edukacja Elementarna
w Teorii i Praktyce, vol. 16, no. 3(61), pp. 43–56, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.35765/eetp.2021.1661.03.
[4] Y. Kanbay and A. Okanlı, “The effect of critical thinking education on nursing students’ problem-solving skills†,” Contemporary
Nurse, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 313–321, May 2017, doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1339567.
[5] S. M. Wechsler et al., “Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components?,” Thinking Skills and Creativity,

523
vol. 27, no. January 2017, pp. 114–122, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003.
[6] Á. Escolà-Gascón, N. Dagnall, and J. Gallifa, “Critical thinking predicts reductions in Spanish physicians’ stress levels and
promotes fake news detection,” Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 42, no. August, p. 100934, Dec. 2021, doi:
10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100934.
[7] C. P. Dwyer, M. J. Hogan, and I. Stewart, “An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century,” Thinking Skills and
Creativity, vol. 12, pp. 43–52, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004.
[8] R. H. Ennis, “Critical thinking assessment,” Theory Into Practice, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 179–186, 1993, doi:
10.1080/00405849309543594.
[9] L. Khalid, J. Bucheerei, and M. Issah, “Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of barriers to promoting critical thinking skills in the
classroom,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211036094.
[10] K. Larsson, “Understanding and teaching critical thinking—A new approach,” International Journal of Educational Research,
vol. 84, pp. 32–42, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.05.004.
[11] O. L. Liu, L. Frankel, and K. C. Roohr, “Assessing critical thinking in higher education: Current state and directions for next-
generation assessment,” ETS Research Report Series, vol. 2014, no. 1. pp. 1–23, 2014, doi: 10.1002/ets2.12009.
[12] K. C. Roohr and K. Burkander, “Exploring critical thinking as an outcome for students enrolled in community colleges,”
Community College Review, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 330–351, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0091552120923402.
[13] N. Akben, “Effects of the problem-posing approach on students’ problem solving Skills and metacognitive awareness in science
education,” Research in Science Education, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1143–1165, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7.
[14] S. Osman, C. N. A. C. Yang, M. S. Abu, N. Ismail, H. Jambari, and J. A. Kumar, “Enhancing students’ mathematical problem-
solving skills through bar model visualisation technique,” International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 13, no.
3, pp. 273–279, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.12973/iejme/3919.
[15] N. Özreçberoğlu and Ç. K. Çağanağa, “Making it count: Strategies for improving problem-solving skills in mathematics for
students and teachers’ classroom management,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no.
4, pp. 1253–1261, 2018, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/82536.
[16] F. Ukobizaba, G. Nizeyimana, and A. Mukuka, “Assessment strategies for enhancing students’ mathematical problem-solving
skills: A review of literature,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–10,
2021, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/9728.
[17] N. Nurfatanah, R. Rusmono, and N. Nurjanah, “Mathematical problem-solving skills of elementary school students (in
Indonesian),” in 2018 Prosiding Seminar dan Diskusi Nasional Pendidikan Dasar, 2018.
[18] N. M. Hassan and S. Rahman, “Problem solving skills, metacognitive awareness, and mathematics achievement: A mediation
model,” The New Educational Review, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 201–212, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.15804/tner.2017.49.3.16.
[19] H. Hendriana, R. Purwasih, E. Triawan, Y. Prasetio, and T. Satria, “Analysis of student problem solving skill and activity
concentration on a senior high school,” Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Jun. 2018, doi:
10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2068.
[20] T. Mulyati, “Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa sekolah dasar,” EduHumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 3,
no. 2, pp. 546–551, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.17509/eh.v3i2.2807.
[21] M. K. D. Ling and S. C. Loh, “Relationship of creativity and critical thinking to pattern recognition among Singapore private
school students,” Journal of Educational Research, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 59–76, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00220671.2020.1716203.
[22] M. K. D. Ling and S. C. Loh, “Relationships between cognitive pattern recognition and specific mathematical domains in
mathematics education,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, pp. 1–21, Aug. 2021, doi:
10.1080/0020739X.2021.1949059.
[23] G. C. Karantzas et al., “Enhancing critical analysis and problem-solving skills in undergraduate psychology: An evaluation of a
collaborative learning and problem-based learning approach,” Australian Journal of Psychology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 38–45, 2013,
doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12009.
[24] S. Pill and B. SueSee, “Including critical thinking and problem solving in physical education,” Journal of Physical Education,
Recreation & Dance, vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 43–49, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1080/07303084.2017.1367741.
[25] E. H. J. Yew and K. Goh, “Problem-based learning: An overview of its process and impact on learning,” Health Professions
Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 75–79, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004.
[26] R. I. Arends and A. Kilcher, Teaching for student learning: Becoming an accomplished teacher. New York, NY: Routledge,
2010.
[27] A. S. Argaw, B. B. Haile, B. T. Ayalew, and S. G. Kuma, “The effect of problem based learning (PBL) instruction on students’
motivation and problem solving skills of physics,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13,
no. 3, pp. 857–871, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00647a.
[28] P. A. Ertmer and K. D. Simons, “Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K–12 teachers,”
Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–54, May 2006, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1005.
[29] D. Gijbels, F. Dochy, P. Van Den Bossche, and M. Segers, “Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of
assessment,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 27–61, 2005, doi: 10.3102/00346543075001027.
[30] Sajidan, Suranto, I. R. W. Atmojo, D. Y. Saputri, and R. Etviana, “Problem-based learning-collaboration (PBL-C) model in
elementary school science learning in the industrial revolution era 4.0 and Indonesia society 5.0,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA
Indonesia, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 477–488, 2022, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v11i3.30631.
[31] M. E. Peffer, M. Renken, P. Enderle, and J. Cohen, “Mission to planet markle: Problem-based learning for teaching elementary
students difficult content and practices,” Research in Science Education, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1365–1389, 2021, doi:
10.1007/s11165-019-09875-z.
[32] S. S. H. Wong, M. Kim, and Q. Jin, “Critical literacy practices within problem-based learning projects in science,” Interchange,
vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 463–477, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10780-021-09426-4.
[33] A. Dorimana, A. Uworwabayeho, and G. Nizeyimana, “Enhancing upper secondary learners’ problem-solving abilities using
problem-based learning in mathematics,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 21, no. 8,
pp. 235–252, 2022, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.21.8.14.
[34] Yerizon, I. M. Arnawa, N. Fitriani, and N. M. Tajudin, “Constructing calculus concepts through worksheet based problem-based
learning assisted by GeoGebra software,” HighTech and Innovation Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 282–296, 2022, doi: 10.28991/HIJ-
2022-03-03-04.
[35] N. A. I. Sakir and J. G. Kim, “Enhancing students’ learning activity and outcomes via implementation of problem-based
learning,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 12, p. em1925, 2020, doi:
10.29333/ejmste/9344.
[36] T. Y. E. Siswono, S. Hartono, and A. W. Kohar, “Effectiveness of project based learning in statistics for lower secondary

 ISSN: 2089-9823
524
schools,” Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 75, pp. 197–212, 2018, doi:
10.14689/ejer.2018.75.11.
[37] E. Evendi, A. K. Al Kusaeri, M. H. H. Pardi, L. Sucipto, F. Bayani, and S. Prayogi, “Assessing students’ critical thinking skills
viewed from cognitive style: Study on implementation of problem-based e-learning model in mathematics courses,” Eurasia
Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 7, 2022, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/12161.
[38] B. Cahyono, K. Kartono, B. Waluya, M. Mulyono, and R. D. Setyawati, “Problem-based learning supported by arguments
scaffolding that affect critical thinking teacher candidates,” Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2956–
2969, 2021, doi: 10.18844/cjes.v16i6.6480.
[39] N. Alfares, “The effect of problem-based learning on students’ problem-solving self-efficacy through blackboard system in higher
education,” International Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 185–200, 2021, doi:
10.18488/journal.61.2021.91.185.200.
[40] J. C. Trullàs, C. Blay, E. Sarri, and R. Pujol, “Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical
education: A scoping review,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03154-8.
[41] S. Bai, L. Zhang, Z. Ye, D. Yang, T. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “The benefits of using atypical presentations and rare diseases in
problem-based learning in undergraduate medical education,” BMC medical education, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 93, 2023, doi:
10.1186/s12909-023-04079-6.
[42] K. Ishizuka et al., “Hybrid PBL and pure PBL: Which one is more effective in developing clinical reasoning skills for general
medicine clerkship?—A mixed-method study,” Plos One, vol. 18, no. 1, p. e0279554, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279554.
[43] A. Klegeris and H. Hurren, “Impact of problem-based learning in a large classroom setting: Student perception and problem-
solving skills,” American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 408–415, 2011, doi:
10.1152/advan.00046.2011.
[44] Z. A. Kadir, N. H. Abdullah, E. Anthony, B. M. Salleh, and R. Kamarulzaman, “Does problem-based learning improve problem
solving skills?—A study among business undergraduates at Malaysian Premier Technical University,” International Education
Studies, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 166–172, 2016, doi: 10.5539/ies.v9n5p166.
[45] F. Z. Kök and B. Duman, “The effect of problem-based learning on problem-solving skills in English language teaching,” Journal
of Pedagogical Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 154–173, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.33902/JPR.202318642.
[46] P. Cobb, M. Stephan, K. Mcclain, and K. Gravemeijer, “Participating in classroom mathematical practices,” in A Journey in
Mathematics Education Research, vol. 10, A. Sfard, K. Gravemeijer, and E. Yackel, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011,
pp. 117–163.
[47] K. Gravemeijer and P. Cobb, “Design research from a learning design perspective,” in Educational design research, T. Plomp and
N. Nieveen, Eds. London, UK: Routledge, 2013, pp. 17–51.
[48] J. Jailani, S. Sugiman, and E. Apino, “Implementing the problem-based learning in order to improve the students’ HOTS and
characters,” Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 247–259, 2017, doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.17674.
[49] R. D. Anazifa and Djukri, “Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking
skills?,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 346–355, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.15294/JPII.V6I2.11100.
[50] H. Djidu, J. Jailani, and H. Retnawati, “Higher-order thinking skills among male and female students: An experimental study of
the problem-based calculus learning model in secondary schools,” Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 107–125,
2021, doi: 10.20414/betajtm.v14i2.432.
[51] D. S. Setiana, R. Y. Purwoko, and S. Sugiman, “The application of mathematics learning model to stimulate mathematical critical
thinking skills of senior high school students,” European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 509–523, Jan. 2021,
doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.509.
[52] E. Ahdhianto, M. Arafik, M. A. Thohir, S. Mas’ula, and Y. D. Putra, “Development of PBL-based Web Learning Model for
Students of Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program,” in 2022 2nd International Conference on Information
Technology and Education (ICIT&E), 2022, pp. 247–250, doi: 10.1109/ICITE54466.2022.9759868.
[53] N. Ragilia, A. Ambarita, and N. E. Rusminto, “Development of problem based learning model learner worksheet to improve
critical thinking ability,” IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2018, doi: 10.9790/7388-
0801046572.
[54] N. Nieveen, “Prototype to reach product quality,” in Design Approaches and Tools In Education and Training, J. Akker, Ed.
Dordretch: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1999, pp. 125–136.
[55] N. Nieveen and E. Folmer, “Formative evaluation in educational design research,” in Educational design research: Part A: An
introduction, T. Plomp and N. Nieveen, Eds. Enschede, Netherland: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO),
2013, pp. 152–169.
[56] S. Cheng, M. Ferris, and J. Perolio, “An innovative classroom approach for developing critical thinkers in the introductory
statistics course,” The American Statistician, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 354–358, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1305293.
[57] D. H. J. M. Dolmans, W. De Grave, I. H. A. P. Wolfhagen, and C. P. M. Van Der Vleuten, “Problem-based learning: Future
challenges for educational practice and research,” Medical Education, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 732–741, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-
2929.2005.02205.x.
[58] T. Soebari and J. M. Aldridge, “Investigating the differential effectiveness of a teacher professional development programme for
rural and urban classrooms in Indonesia,” Teacher Development, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 701–722, 2016, doi:
10.1080/13664530.2016.1185031.
[59] M. Demirel and M. Dağyar, “Effects of problem-based learning on attitude: A meta-analysis study,” Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 2115–2137, Jul. 2016, doi:
10.12973/EURASIA.2016.1293A.
[60] W. Hung, “Problem design in PBL,” in The Wiley Handbook of Problem‐Based Learning, M. Moallem, W. Hung, and N.
Dabbagh, Eds. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2019, pp. 249–272.
[61] S. S. Nair, S. P. Smritika, and K. A. Thomas, “Revitalizing education through problem based learning practices,” Shanlax
International Journal of Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 2020, doi: 10.34293/education.v9i1.3436.
[62] A. Abdelkarim, D. Schween, and T. Ford, “Advantages and disadvantages of problem-based learning from the professional
perspective of medical and dental faculty,” EC Dental Science, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1073–1079, 2018.

525
BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS
Mathilda Susanti is an assistant professor at the Department of Mathematics
Education, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia. She received her master degree (M.Si) in
Mathematics from Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) and her doctoral degree (Dr.) in
educational sciences with a concentration on mathematics education. She teaches various
courses that mainly focus on probability and statistics, such as introduction to multivariate
statistics, statistics, probability theory, mathematical statistics, nonparametric statistics, and
innovative mathematics learning strategies. Her research interests lie in probability and
statistics learning in higher education and teacher professional development. She can be
reached by email at mathilda@uny.ac.id.
Suyanto is a professor at the Department of Economics Education, Yogyakarta
State University. He earned his master of education (M.Ed.) from Boston University and his
doctor of philosophy (Ph.D.) from Michigan State University. He had been a rector of
Yogyakarta State University and Director General for Management of Primary and Secondary
Education in Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture. He is also known as a writer and
speaker in education. His current positions are as a vice chairman of Majelis Pendidikan
Tinggi Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah and Chairman of Alumni Association of Yogyakarta
State University. He teaches various courses, such as development economics, indonesian
economy, education policy analysis, and contemporary issues in economics education. His
research interests lie in teacher professional development, character education, educational
sciences, and economics education. He can be reached by email at suyanto@uny.ac.id.
Jailani is a professor of Evaluation of Mathematics Education at the Department
of Mathematics Education, Yogyakarta State University. He earned his master degree (M.Pd.)
in mathematics education from Malang Institute of Teacher Training and Education (now
Malang State University) and doctoral degree (Dr.) in educational research and evaluation
from Jakarta State University. He teaches various courses in undergraduate and graduate
program, such as assessment of mathematics learning, statistics, innovative mathematics
learning strategies, instrument development, model of mathematics learning assessment, and
mathematics education problem study. His research interests lie in higher-order thinking skills
(HOTS), mathematics learning model in elementary, secondary, and higher education,
instructional development, and mathematics teacher professional development. He can be
reached by email at jailani@uny.ac.id.
Heri Retnawati is a professor of assessment of mathematics education at the
Department of Mathematics Education, Yogyakarta State University. She earned her master
degree (M.Pd.) and doctoral degree (Dr.) in educational research and evaluation from
Yogyakarta State University. She teaches various courses in undergraduate and graduate
program, such as educational statistics, qualitative research, research design, evaluation of
mathematics education program, meta analysis, academic writing, structural equation
modeling (SEM), meta analysis, multi-level analysis, item response theory (IRT), and
measurement and testing practices. Her research interests lie in higher-order thinking (HOTS),
educational assessment, educational program evaluation, meta-analysis, structural equation
modeling, item response theory (IRT), mathematics learning model, instructional
development, instrument development, and teacher professional development. She can be
reached by email at heri_retnawati@uny.ac.id.

Problem-based learning for improving problem-solving and critical thinking skills: A case on probability theory course

More Related Content

Similar to Problem-based learning for improving problem-solving and critical thinking skills: A case on probability theory course (20)

More from Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Problem-based learning for improving problem-solving and critical thinking skills: A case on probability theory course