Procedures for performing systematic reviews ppt lsj
4 likes520 views
The document outlines the stages of conducting systematic reviews, emphasizing the importance of identifying, evaluating, and interpreting existing evidence. It highlights the need for a rigorous methodology, including developing a search strategy and documenting findings to minimize researcher bias. Additionally, it discusses the critical elements of planning, conducting, and reporting systematic reviews, including study selection and data synthesis.
![.
need for a systematic review
CRC [12] suggests the following checklist:
• objectives
• restrictions
• inclusion/exclusion criteria
• assess the quality
• extracted
• synthesised
combined
• conclusions flow evidence](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/proceduresforperformingsystematicreviewspptlsj-140716203911-phpapp02/85/Procedures-for-performing-systematic-reviews-ppt-lsj-7-320.jpg)
![.
need for a systematic review
From a more general viewpoint, Greenlaugh [9] suggests the following questions:
•
•
•
•
•](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/proceduresforperformingsystematicreviewspptlsj-140716203911-phpapp02/85/Procedures-for-performing-systematic-reviews-ppt-lsj-8-320.jpg)
Procedures for performing systematic reviews ppt lsj
- 2. ㅣ
- 3. . l concept of rigorous reviews guidelines l l introduction systematic reviews stages
- 4. . identifying evaluating interpreting Reasons for Performing Systematic Reviews • summarise existing evidence • identify • provide • scientific value • predefined search strategy • completeness The Importance of Systematic Reviews
- 5. . identifying evaluating interpreting Advantages and disadvantages • provide information effects phenomenon • combine meta-analytic •
- 6. . Planning Conducting Reporting The stages associated with planning the review are: • need • Development • • Selection • assessment • extraction monitoring • synthesis The stages associated with conducting the review are:
- 7. . need for a systematic review CRC [12] suggests the following checklist: • objectives • restrictions • inclusion/exclusion criteria • assess the quality • extracted • synthesised combined • conclusions flow evidence
- 8. . need for a systematic review From a more general viewpoint, Greenlaugh [9] suggests the following questions: • • • • •
- 9. . reduce the possibility researcher bias most important activity research question. The Research Question In software engineering, questions can be adapted to software engineering issues as follows: < Question Types > • effect • • Identifying cost and risk factors • •
- 10. . population interventions outcomes < Population > • role • type • application area
- 11. . < Intervention > • software technologies • < Outcomes > • factors • population interventions outcomes
- 12. . surrogate measures misleading less robust. Protocol Review • critical element •
- 13. . review start Identification of Research • find primary studies • Generating a search strategy> • iterative benefit research question
- 14. . review start Generating a search strategy> • population, intervention, outcomes, study designs. • synonyms, abbreviations, and alternative spellings. •
- 15. . Identification of Research • Generating a search strategy> Initial searches electronic databases • Reference lists review articles • Journals grey literature conference proceedings • •
- 16. . positive results negative results. Publication Bias • • Documenting the Search • transparent replicable • •
- 18. 5. Conducting the review • 5.1 Identification of Research – 5.1.1 Generating a search strategy Baron-Cohen S, Jolliffe T, Mortimore C, Robertson M. Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 1997;38:813–22. Baron-Cohen S, Ring HA, Wheelwright S, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Simmons A, et al. Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: an fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience 1999;11:1891–8. • 관련 논문의 Reference를 참조하여 중요 논문들을 찾음
- 19. 5. Conducting the review • 5.1 Identification of Research – 5.1.1 Generating a search strategy • Journals (including company journals such as the IBM Journal of Research and Development), grey literature (i.e. technical reports, work in progress) and conference proceedings. • Grey literature : 정식 시판되는 거시 아닌 기관에서 만든 보고서, 학술적인 기술보고서 등 Neuropsychologia Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry European Journal of Neuroscience Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry • Internet
- 20. 5. Conducting the review • 5.1 Identification of Research – 5.1.3 Documenting the Search – Wikipedia List of academic databases and search engines
- 21. . Study selection criteria • • research question • Japanese or Chinese papers are often difficult to access • authors, institutions, journals or year of publication •
- 22. . Study selection process • • • • Reliability of inclusion decisions •
- 23. . Reliability of inclusion decisions •
- 24. . Quality Thresholds • Study design
- 25. . Quality Thresholds • •Table 5 disease condition •
- 26. . Using the Quality Instrument Quality appraisal synthesis of results Limitations of Quality Assessment • possible assume something wasn’t reported,
- 27. . Data Extraction objective of this stage data extraction forms Contents of Data Collection Forms
- 28. . Data Synthesis Descriptive synthesis Quantitative Synthesis Quantitative data Sample size effect size mean values confidence interval
- 29. . Presentation of Quantitative Results presenting quantitative results forest plot • means variance
- 31. . Structure for systematic review
- 32. . Peer Review • • Experts review • • researchers and practitioners, it is worth organising a peer review. •
- 33. .Final remarks •