SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Title of research:
An investigation into the barriers to and priorities for research development in health
librarianship.
Objectives:
 To identify key barriers to and priorities for research development in health
librarianship
 To administrate a national electronic survey to health librarians and information
specialists in England, Scotland and Wales.
Please give a brief justification of your proposed research project:
The question this study aims to answer is: What are the barriers to and priorities for
research development in health librarianship? This question has been given minimal
levels of consideration in the professional literature to date and is a question of
importance for a number of reasons. There is now a growing literature base that
recognises the need for librarians to engage more with research (Powell, Baker et al.
2002; Juznic and Urbanija 2003; Koufogiannakis and Slater 2004; Koufogiannakis and
Crumley 2006). Within the current context of health librarianship strategies are needed
to engage with this more fully and in order to effectively address the associated issues
that relate to improved decision making skills, evidence based practice, and the
improvement of patient care. This is particularly pertinent in light of the recent Hill
Report (Hill 2008, p35) which specifically recommends that “research to measure the
impact of the application of best available evidence in decision making should continue
to be pursued vigorously and routinely by health librarians, in partnership with
researchers’.
Much of the work health librarians are involved with is directly linked to evidence based
health practice, and evidence based medicine and research forms a substantial aspect
of this (Eldredge 2000; Hill 2008). Whilst there is a demand on health professionals to
justify and base their practice on robust research based evidence, there is little evidence
that health librarians are engaging with this in relation to their own professional practice.
Largely, their involvement with evidence based practice is linked directly to health
practice rather than the practice of librarianship. The lack of evidence based practice in
librarianship jeopardises the credibility of health librarians in their involvement with
evidence based health practice and it is widely reported that increased engagement with
evidence based librarianship amongst the profession is becoming increasingly important.
For health librarians to credibly support evidence based health practice / medicine it is
arguable that the profession should be able to demonstrate evidence based practice in
relation to its own professional practice (Eldredge 2000; Booth and Brice 2003; Grant
2003). This is particularly relevant since the end purpose of health librarianship is
directly linked to the improvement of patient care (Hill 2008). For health librarians to
take a truly evidence based approach to their professional practice, increased
engagement with research activities is necessary. At present however, there is little
evidence that health librarians are engaging with research in relation to their own
professional practice (Booth 2002; Booth and Brice 2003). Whilst some small pockets of
active engagement exist, largely this remains a specialist interest area rather than
something that is taken on board profession-wide (Booth 2002). Reluctance to conduct
research in relation to health librarianship (rather than health practice) within the
profession is widely documented (Booth 2002; Booth 2003). However, with the
exception of a generic study (McNicol and Nankivell 2003) which aimed to survey
librarians from all subject disciplines and which had poor coverage of health librarians,
the reasons behind this have not as yet been fully investigated.
The study by McNicol and Nankivell (2003) identified the LIS research agenda to be
poorly organised and lacking in direction. It is expected that in carrying out this study a
deeper understanding of the reluctance amongst health librarians to engage in research
and other related issues they perceive create barriers to their engagement with research
activity will be gained. The study will also aim to investigate what they feel are the
priorities for research development to aid this current situation. It is anticipated that from
the data collected, a clearer and deeper understanding of the issues can be acquired.
This will inform the development of a framework which will provide clarity and direction
for the profession. Furthermore, it will make recommendations as to how best research
development can be taken forward in the profession based on sound evidence derived
from the population to which it concerns. The use of a large scale electronic web based
survey method will help to acquire a valid data set which is expected to make a
substantial and effective contribution to answering the research question. The results
and recommendations will be widely disseminated through a variety of appropriate
channels.
References
Booth, A. (2002). "Mirage or reality." Health information and libraries journal 19(2): 56-
58.
Booth, A. (2003). "Bridging the research-practice gap: the role of evidence based
librarianship." The New Review of Information and Library Research 9(1): 3-23.
Booth, A. and A. Brice (2003). "Clear-cut?: facilitating health librarians to use information
research in practice." Health information and libraries journal 20(S1): 45-52.
Eldredge, J. D. (2000). "Evidence-based librarianship: an overview." Bulletin of the
Medical Library Association 88(4): 289-302.
Grant, M. L. (2003). "Journal clubs for continued professional development." Health
information and libraries journal 20(1): 72-78.
Hill, P. (2008). Report of a national review of NHS library services in England: from
knowledge to health in the 21st century. Newcastle, Institute of Health and Society.
Juznic, P. and J. Urbanija (2003). "Developing research skills in library and information
studies." Library Management 274(6/7): 324-331.
Koufogiannakis, D. and E. Crumley (2006). "Research in librarianship: issues to
consider." Library Hi Tech 24(3): 324-340.
Koufogiannakis, D. and L. Slater (2004). "A content analysis of librarianship research."
Journal of Information Science 30(3): 227-239.
McNicol, S. and C. Nankivell (2003). The LIS research landscape: a review and
prognosis, Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals.
Powell, R. R., L. M. Baker, et al. (2002). "Library and information science practitioners
and research." Library and Information Science Research 24(1): 49-72.
Please outline the proposed sample group, including any specific criteria:
The sample group will aim to include representation from eight identified areas of health
librarianship:
Senior strategic health librarians
Clinical librarians
Health library service managers
Senior information strategy managers
Academic health librarians
Independent health librarians
Research librarians
Academics
The qualifying criteria required for inclusion in the survey will be health librarians and
information specialists working in the above context areas, and who hold a professional
LIS qualification (ie. degree level or above).
Describe how the proposed sample group will be formulated:
The study will aim to cover a wide sample group formulated from individuals working in
the context areas identified above. Potential participants will be identified from LIS
related JISCmail groups, professional directories, university LIS departments, special
interest and professional groups, and cascades through senior managers and group
Chairs.
Indicate clearly what the involvement of the sample group will be in the
research process:
The involvement of the sample group in the study will extend to the completion of an
electronic survey which will be sent via email.
Specify how the consent of participants will be obtained. Please include
within this a description of any information with which you intend to
provide the subjects:
Consent will be gained from respondents immediately before participants complete the
survey. An invitation email will be sent out to potential participants containing details
about the study and a link to the survey. Consent will be obtained from respondents
through the inclusion of a statement of consent which will be embedded at the beginning
of the survey before the respondent commences with completion of their response.
Upon accessing the survey link, respondents will be directed to read the statement of
consent and offered the option to consent to their involvement in the study or not.
Provided the participant opts to consent to their participation, the survey will then open
for them to complete. From the time of sending out the invitation to participate and link
to the survey, potential respondents will be given six weeks in which to complete the
survey (with a reminder being sent out at three weeks), if they decide to do so after
having read the statement of consent.
Indicate any potential risks to subjects and how you propose to minimise
these:
Participation in this survey presents no potential risks to the participants. Participants
and their organisations will not be named in subsequent write ups and material
submitted for publication.
Describe the procedures you intend to follow in order to maintain the
anonymity and confidentiality of the subjects:
The email addresses from which responses will be sent will be automatically removed by
the survey software used (SurveyMonkey). The identity of respondents will therefore not
be known to the researchers at the survey return stage. Participants and their
organisations will not be named in subsequent write ups and material submitted for
publication.
RESEARCH CONSENT FORM
Title of study
An investigation into the barriers to and priorities for research development in health
librarianship
Please read and complete this form carefully. If you are willing to participate in
this study, ring the appropriate responses and sign and date the declaration at the
end. If you do not understand anything and would like more information, please
ask.
I have had the research satisfactorily explained to me in written form by the researcher.
YES / NO
I understand that the research will involve:
 The completion of an electronic survey on the topic of research development issues
in health librarianship.
YES / NO
I understand that I may withdraw from this study at any time without having to give an
explanation.
YES / NO
I understand that all information about me will be treated in strict confidence and that I
will not be named in any written work arising from this study
YES / NO
I understand that any data collected will be used solely for research purposes and will be
erased on completion of your research.
YES / NO
I understand that the data will only be discussed within the research team
YES / NO
I understand that survey participants and their respective organisations will not be
named in subsequent write ups and material submitted for publication
YES / NO
I freely give my consent to participate in this research study and have been given a copy
of this form for my own information.
Signature: ………………………………………………………
Name (capital letters)…………………………………………..
Date: ……………………………………………………………
Contact details: (include address, email and telephone number)
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………
Thank you for your interest in the study.

More Related Content

PPTX
Methods Pyramids as an Organizing Structure for Evidence-Based Medicine--SIGC...
PPT
Harikesh maurya
PPTX
Continued citation of bad science and what we can do about it--2021-04-20
PPTX
The journal club (education purpose)
PPTX
How to search the medical literature on the net
PDF
National Patient and Stakeholder Dialogue
PPTX
The process of conducting a systematic review2011ver4
DOCX
Name olubunmi salako date 1262021identification of scenario
Methods Pyramids as an Organizing Structure for Evidence-Based Medicine--SIGC...
Harikesh maurya
Continued citation of bad science and what we can do about it--2021-04-20
The journal club (education purpose)
How to search the medical literature on the net
National Patient and Stakeholder Dialogue
The process of conducting a systematic review2011ver4
Name olubunmi salako date 1262021identification of scenario

What's hot (20)

DOC
Char for more infos
PDF
Trust, Respect, and Reciprocity
PDF
The Process of Health Research and literature reviews
PPTX
Hisrorical evelotion and trends in nursing research
PPTX
Impact of clinical research as a confounder for medical school rankings
PPTX
Utilization of biostatistics in medicine and dentistry
PPT
Keeping up with the Medical Literature
PPTX
Using NHS Electronic Health Records for Research
PPTX
Problem-citations--CrossrefLive18--2018-11-13
PPTX
Accuracy of Abstracts in Pharmacy Journals for Original Research Articles – P...
PDF
Accuracy of Abstracts in Pharmacy Journals for Original Research Articles – P...
PDF
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH METHODS: Case-Control Studies and Cohort Studies
PDF
Lifetime risk cardiovascular disease sample paper - essay
PPT
Swomen Retreat Oct 2009
PPTX
Ahmed Negida, MBBCh - Biography
PPTX
Journal club final secrets v2 ss1
PDF
Introduction to Biostatistics
PPTX
Longitudinal research
PDF
Challenges Confronting Scientific Research A Systematic Review
DOCX
Translating research for health policy june 2014
Char for more infos
Trust, Respect, and Reciprocity
The Process of Health Research and literature reviews
Hisrorical evelotion and trends in nursing research
Impact of clinical research as a confounder for medical school rankings
Utilization of biostatistics in medicine and dentistry
Keeping up with the Medical Literature
Using NHS Electronic Health Records for Research
Problem-citations--CrossrefLive18--2018-11-13
Accuracy of Abstracts in Pharmacy Journals for Original Research Articles – P...
Accuracy of Abstracts in Pharmacy Journals for Original Research Articles – P...
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH METHODS: Case-Control Studies and Cohort Studies
Lifetime risk cardiovascular disease sample paper - essay
Swomen Retreat Oct 2009
Ahmed Negida, MBBCh - Biography
Journal club final secrets v2 ss1
Introduction to Biostatistics
Longitudinal research
Challenges Confronting Scientific Research A Systematic Review
Translating research for health policy june 2014
Ad

Similar to Proposal-Example-3.doc (20)

PDF
Nursing Midwifes
DOC
Proposal-Example-1.doc
PDF
An Introduction To Reading And Appraising Qualitative Research
PDF
The case study approach
PPTX
Scope and significance of evidence based research in nursing practice27 5-20
DOCX
The State of the Science in PracticeThe phrase evidence-.docx
DOCX
NHSFPX 4000 Capella University Eliminating Medical Errors Bibliography.docx
DOCX
799What is GoodQualitative ResearchA First Step towar.docx
PDF
Bio-Statistics newer advances, Scope & Challenges in Bio-Medical Research
PDF
Biostatistics is a critical subject in current health data research – pubrica
PDF
Understanding the-value-of-case-reports-and-studies-in-the-context-of-clinica...
DOCX
PU36CH26-Woolf ARI 12 February 2015 1347Translating Evide.docx
PDF
Evidence management-from-theory-to-practice-in-health-care
PDF
Naf ppt
DOCX
EVIDENCE –BASED PRACTICES1Evidence-Based Pract
PPTX
Education research cultures
DOCX
2010 ACA Legislation.docx
PDF
Evidence based medicine in mass gathering public health and emergency medicin...
PDF
Accessing and Sharing Electronic Personal Health Data.
PDF
Accessing and Sharing Electronic Personal Health Data
Nursing Midwifes
Proposal-Example-1.doc
An Introduction To Reading And Appraising Qualitative Research
The case study approach
Scope and significance of evidence based research in nursing practice27 5-20
The State of the Science in PracticeThe phrase evidence-.docx
NHSFPX 4000 Capella University Eliminating Medical Errors Bibliography.docx
799What is GoodQualitative ResearchA First Step towar.docx
Bio-Statistics newer advances, Scope & Challenges in Bio-Medical Research
Biostatistics is a critical subject in current health data research – pubrica
Understanding the-value-of-case-reports-and-studies-in-the-context-of-clinica...
PU36CH26-Woolf ARI 12 February 2015 1347Translating Evide.docx
Evidence management-from-theory-to-practice-in-health-care
Naf ppt
EVIDENCE –BASED PRACTICES1Evidence-Based Pract
Education research cultures
2010 ACA Legislation.docx
Evidence based medicine in mass gathering public health and emergency medicin...
Accessing and Sharing Electronic Personal Health Data.
Accessing and Sharing Electronic Personal Health Data
Ad

More from mebrahten1 (6)

PDF
sample-annotated-research-proposal.pdf
DOC
Proposal-Example-2.doc
PDF
SoPH-Format-for-Research-Proposal-and-Thesis.pdf
DOC
Proposal-Example-4.doc
PDF
b.sc_project_proposal_format good.pdf
PDF
sample-research-proposal_2.pdf
sample-annotated-research-proposal.pdf
Proposal-Example-2.doc
SoPH-Format-for-Research-Proposal-and-Thesis.pdf
Proposal-Example-4.doc
b.sc_project_proposal_format good.pdf
sample-research-proposal_2.pdf

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Unit I ESSENTIAL OF DIGITAL MARKETING.pdf
PDF
Exploratory_Data_Analysis_Fundamentals.pdf
PDF
Analyzing Impact of Pakistan Economic Corridor on Import and Export in Pakist...
PDF
Level 2 – IBM Data and AI Fundamentals (1)_v1.1.PDF
PPT
Introduction, IoT Design Methodology, Case Study on IoT System for Weather Mo...
PPTX
UNIT - 3 Total quality Management .pptx
PDF
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
PDF
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
PDF
Abrasive, erosive and cavitation wear.pdf
PDF
BIO-INSPIRED ARCHITECTURE FOR PARSIMONIOUS CONVERSATIONAL INTELLIGENCE : THE ...
PDF
Soil Improvement Techniques Note - Rabbi
PDF
null (2) bgfbg bfgb bfgb fbfg bfbgf b.pdf
PPTX
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
PPTX
introduction to high performance computing
PDF
86236642-Electric-Loco-Shed.pdf jfkduklg
PPT
Total quality management ppt for engineering students
PPTX
communication and presentation skills 01
PDF
Integrating Fractal Dimension and Time Series Analysis for Optimized Hyperspe...
PPT
introduction to datamining and warehousing
PPTX
Artificial Intelligence
Unit I ESSENTIAL OF DIGITAL MARKETING.pdf
Exploratory_Data_Analysis_Fundamentals.pdf
Analyzing Impact of Pakistan Economic Corridor on Import and Export in Pakist...
Level 2 – IBM Data and AI Fundamentals (1)_v1.1.PDF
Introduction, IoT Design Methodology, Case Study on IoT System for Weather Mo...
UNIT - 3 Total quality Management .pptx
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
Abrasive, erosive and cavitation wear.pdf
BIO-INSPIRED ARCHITECTURE FOR PARSIMONIOUS CONVERSATIONAL INTELLIGENCE : THE ...
Soil Improvement Techniques Note - Rabbi
null (2) bgfbg bfgb bfgb fbfg bfbgf b.pdf
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
introduction to high performance computing
86236642-Electric-Loco-Shed.pdf jfkduklg
Total quality management ppt for engineering students
communication and presentation skills 01
Integrating Fractal Dimension and Time Series Analysis for Optimized Hyperspe...
introduction to datamining and warehousing
Artificial Intelligence

Proposal-Example-3.doc

  • 1. Title of research: An investigation into the barriers to and priorities for research development in health librarianship. Objectives:  To identify key barriers to and priorities for research development in health librarianship  To administrate a national electronic survey to health librarians and information specialists in England, Scotland and Wales. Please give a brief justification of your proposed research project: The question this study aims to answer is: What are the barriers to and priorities for research development in health librarianship? This question has been given minimal levels of consideration in the professional literature to date and is a question of importance for a number of reasons. There is now a growing literature base that recognises the need for librarians to engage more with research (Powell, Baker et al. 2002; Juznic and Urbanija 2003; Koufogiannakis and Slater 2004; Koufogiannakis and Crumley 2006). Within the current context of health librarianship strategies are needed to engage with this more fully and in order to effectively address the associated issues that relate to improved decision making skills, evidence based practice, and the improvement of patient care. This is particularly pertinent in light of the recent Hill Report (Hill 2008, p35) which specifically recommends that “research to measure the impact of the application of best available evidence in decision making should continue to be pursued vigorously and routinely by health librarians, in partnership with researchers’. Much of the work health librarians are involved with is directly linked to evidence based health practice, and evidence based medicine and research forms a substantial aspect of this (Eldredge 2000; Hill 2008). Whilst there is a demand on health professionals to justify and base their practice on robust research based evidence, there is little evidence that health librarians are engaging with this in relation to their own professional practice. Largely, their involvement with evidence based practice is linked directly to health practice rather than the practice of librarianship. The lack of evidence based practice in librarianship jeopardises the credibility of health librarians in their involvement with evidence based health practice and it is widely reported that increased engagement with evidence based librarianship amongst the profession is becoming increasingly important. For health librarians to credibly support evidence based health practice / medicine it is arguable that the profession should be able to demonstrate evidence based practice in relation to its own professional practice (Eldredge 2000; Booth and Brice 2003; Grant 2003). This is particularly relevant since the end purpose of health librarianship is directly linked to the improvement of patient care (Hill 2008). For health librarians to take a truly evidence based approach to their professional practice, increased engagement with research activities is necessary. At present however, there is little evidence that health librarians are engaging with research in relation to their own
  • 2. professional practice (Booth 2002; Booth and Brice 2003). Whilst some small pockets of active engagement exist, largely this remains a specialist interest area rather than something that is taken on board profession-wide (Booth 2002). Reluctance to conduct research in relation to health librarianship (rather than health practice) within the profession is widely documented (Booth 2002; Booth 2003). However, with the exception of a generic study (McNicol and Nankivell 2003) which aimed to survey librarians from all subject disciplines and which had poor coverage of health librarians, the reasons behind this have not as yet been fully investigated. The study by McNicol and Nankivell (2003) identified the LIS research agenda to be poorly organised and lacking in direction. It is expected that in carrying out this study a deeper understanding of the reluctance amongst health librarians to engage in research and other related issues they perceive create barriers to their engagement with research activity will be gained. The study will also aim to investigate what they feel are the priorities for research development to aid this current situation. It is anticipated that from the data collected, a clearer and deeper understanding of the issues can be acquired. This will inform the development of a framework which will provide clarity and direction for the profession. Furthermore, it will make recommendations as to how best research development can be taken forward in the profession based on sound evidence derived from the population to which it concerns. The use of a large scale electronic web based survey method will help to acquire a valid data set which is expected to make a substantial and effective contribution to answering the research question. The results and recommendations will be widely disseminated through a variety of appropriate channels. References Booth, A. (2002). "Mirage or reality." Health information and libraries journal 19(2): 56- 58. Booth, A. (2003). "Bridging the research-practice gap: the role of evidence based librarianship." The New Review of Information and Library Research 9(1): 3-23. Booth, A. and A. Brice (2003). "Clear-cut?: facilitating health librarians to use information research in practice." Health information and libraries journal 20(S1): 45-52. Eldredge, J. D. (2000). "Evidence-based librarianship: an overview." Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 88(4): 289-302. Grant, M. L. (2003). "Journal clubs for continued professional development." Health information and libraries journal 20(1): 72-78. Hill, P. (2008). Report of a national review of NHS library services in England: from knowledge to health in the 21st century. Newcastle, Institute of Health and Society. Juznic, P. and J. Urbanija (2003). "Developing research skills in library and information studies." Library Management 274(6/7): 324-331. Koufogiannakis, D. and E. Crumley (2006). "Research in librarianship: issues to consider." Library Hi Tech 24(3): 324-340.
  • 3. Koufogiannakis, D. and L. Slater (2004). "A content analysis of librarianship research." Journal of Information Science 30(3): 227-239. McNicol, S. and C. Nankivell (2003). The LIS research landscape: a review and prognosis, Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals. Powell, R. R., L. M. Baker, et al. (2002). "Library and information science practitioners and research." Library and Information Science Research 24(1): 49-72. Please outline the proposed sample group, including any specific criteria: The sample group will aim to include representation from eight identified areas of health librarianship: Senior strategic health librarians Clinical librarians Health library service managers Senior information strategy managers Academic health librarians Independent health librarians Research librarians Academics The qualifying criteria required for inclusion in the survey will be health librarians and information specialists working in the above context areas, and who hold a professional LIS qualification (ie. degree level or above). Describe how the proposed sample group will be formulated: The study will aim to cover a wide sample group formulated from individuals working in the context areas identified above. Potential participants will be identified from LIS related JISCmail groups, professional directories, university LIS departments, special interest and professional groups, and cascades through senior managers and group Chairs. Indicate clearly what the involvement of the sample group will be in the research process: The involvement of the sample group in the study will extend to the completion of an electronic survey which will be sent via email.
  • 4. Specify how the consent of participants will be obtained. Please include within this a description of any information with which you intend to provide the subjects: Consent will be gained from respondents immediately before participants complete the survey. An invitation email will be sent out to potential participants containing details about the study and a link to the survey. Consent will be obtained from respondents through the inclusion of a statement of consent which will be embedded at the beginning of the survey before the respondent commences with completion of their response. Upon accessing the survey link, respondents will be directed to read the statement of consent and offered the option to consent to their involvement in the study or not. Provided the participant opts to consent to their participation, the survey will then open for them to complete. From the time of sending out the invitation to participate and link to the survey, potential respondents will be given six weeks in which to complete the survey (with a reminder being sent out at three weeks), if they decide to do so after having read the statement of consent. Indicate any potential risks to subjects and how you propose to minimise these: Participation in this survey presents no potential risks to the participants. Participants and their organisations will not be named in subsequent write ups and material submitted for publication. Describe the procedures you intend to follow in order to maintain the anonymity and confidentiality of the subjects: The email addresses from which responses will be sent will be automatically removed by the survey software used (SurveyMonkey). The identity of respondents will therefore not be known to the researchers at the survey return stage. Participants and their organisations will not be named in subsequent write ups and material submitted for publication.
  • 5. RESEARCH CONSENT FORM Title of study An investigation into the barriers to and priorities for research development in health librarianship Please read and complete this form carefully. If you are willing to participate in this study, ring the appropriate responses and sign and date the declaration at the end. If you do not understand anything and would like more information, please ask. I have had the research satisfactorily explained to me in written form by the researcher. YES / NO I understand that the research will involve:  The completion of an electronic survey on the topic of research development issues in health librarianship. YES / NO I understand that I may withdraw from this study at any time without having to give an explanation. YES / NO I understand that all information about me will be treated in strict confidence and that I will not be named in any written work arising from this study YES / NO
  • 6. I understand that any data collected will be used solely for research purposes and will be erased on completion of your research. YES / NO I understand that the data will only be discussed within the research team YES / NO I understand that survey participants and their respective organisations will not be named in subsequent write ups and material submitted for publication YES / NO I freely give my consent to participate in this research study and have been given a copy of this form for my own information. Signature: ……………………………………………………… Name (capital letters)………………………………………….. Date: …………………………………………………………… Contact details: (include address, email and telephone number) ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………… Thank you for your interest in the study.