Q2 2009 Earning Report of Lindsay Corporation

LINDSAY CORP

FORM Report)10-Q
(Quarterly

Filed 07/09/09 for the Period Ending 05/31/09

Address 2707 NORTH 108TH STREET STE 102
OMAHA, NE 68164
Telephone 4024282131
CIK 0000836157
Symbol LNN
SIC Code 3523 - Farm Machinery and Equipment
Industry Constr. & Agric. Machinery
Sector Capital Goods
Fiscal Year 08/31

http://www.edgar-online.com
© Copyright 2009, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2009

OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-13419

Lindsay Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 47-0554096
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

2222 N 111th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68164
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

402-829-6800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data
File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No
As of June 30, 2009 , 12,310,295 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Lindsay Corporation
INDEX FORM 10-Q

Page No.
Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – Financial Statements

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 3

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, May 31, 2009 and 2008 and August 31, 2008 4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008 5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 6-16

ITEM 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 17-25

ITEM 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 25-26

ITEM 4 – Controls and Procedures 26

Part II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – Legal Proceedings 26-27

ITEM 1A – Risk Factors 27

ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 27

ITEM 6 – Exhibits 28

SIGNATURE 29

-2-

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 — Financial Statements

Lindsay Corporation and Subsidiaries
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
May 31, May 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2009 2008 2009 2008
Operating revenues $ 84,578 $143,562 $262,845 $327,908
Cost of operating revenues 63,509 106,460 199,851 241,472
Gross profit 21,069 37,102 62,994 86,436

Operating expenses:
Selling expense 5,186 6,847 17,567 18,199
General and administrative expense 7,000 8,112 21,837 20,763
Engineering and research expense 1,346 1,693 4,706 4,655
Total operating expenses 13,532 16,652 44,110 43,617

Operating income 7,537 20,450 18,884 42,819

Other income (expense):
Interest expense (465) (787) (1,570) (2,207)
Interest income 200 346 741 1,199
Other income (expense), net 636 299 (832) 520

Earnings before income taxes 7,908 20,308 17,223 42,331

Income tax provision 2,639 6,201 5,482 14,178

Net earnings $ 5,269 $ 14,107 $ 11,741 $ 28,153

Basic net earnings per share $ 0.43 $ 1.18 $ 0.96 $ 2.37

Diluted net earnings per share $ 0.42 $ 1.15 $ 0.94 $ 2.29

Weighted average shares outstanding 12,305 11,958 12,280 11,857
Diluted effect of stock equivalents 136 362 168 411
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution 12,441 12,320 12,448 12,268

Cash dividends per share $ 0.075 $ 0.070 $ 0.225 $ 0.210

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

-3-

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited) (Unaudited)
May 31, May 31, August 31,
($ in thousands, except par values) 2009 2008 2008
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 63,212 $ 19,068 $ 50,760
Receivables, net of allowance, $1,503, $1,319 and $1,457, respectively 57,371 82,859 88,410
Inventories, net 54,355 61,118 53,409
Deferred income taxes 8,591 7,054 8,095
Other current assets 5,886 12,150 7,947
Total current assets 189,415 182,249 208,621

Property, plant and equipment, net 56,964 56,657 57,571
Other intangible assets, net 28,383 31,943 30,808
Goodwill, net 24,079 25,009 24,430
Other noncurrent assets 5,479 5,628 5,447
Total assets $ 304,320 $ 301,486 $326,877

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 18,463 $ 27,967 $ 32,818
Notes payable 1,595 1,492 1,773
Current portion of long-term debt 6,171 6,171 6,171
Other current liabilities 29,362 33,285 42,693
Total current liabilities 55,591 68,915 83,455

Pension benefits liabilities 5,588 5,384 5,673
Long-term debt 20,997 27,168 25,625
Deferred income taxes 11,935 10,831 11,786
Other noncurrent liabilities 5,619 5,592 4,437
Total liabilities 99,730 117,890 130,976

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, ($1 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and
outstanding) — — —
Common stock, ($1 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 18,121,203, 18,054,292
and 18,055,292 shares issued at May 31, 2009 and 2008 and August 31, 2008,
respectively) 18,121 18,054 18,055
Capital in excess of stated value 28,304 25,489 26,352
Retained earnings 248,594 229,576 239,676
Less treasury stock (at cost, 5,813,448, 5,963,448 and 5,843,448 shares at May 31,
2009 and 2008 and August 31, 2008, respectively) (92,796) (95,190) (93,275)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net 2,367 5,667 5,093
Total shareholders’ equity 204,590 183,596 195,901
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 304,320 $ 301,486 $326,877


-4-

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended
May 31,
($ in thousands) 2009 2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net earnings $ 11,741 $ 28,153
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 7,917 6,647
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable 205 (22)
Deferred income taxes (1,897) (247)
Stock-based compensation expense 1,504 2,384
Other, net 1,072 40
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables, net 28,703 (30,958)
Inventories, net (2,248) (14,692)
Other current assets 1,406 (804)
Accounts payable (13,443) 6,373
Other current liabilities (9,715) 6,508
Current taxes payable (2,356) (3,489)
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities 1,372 (3,529)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 24,261 (3,636)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (6,148) (11,020)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 25 28
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired — (21,028)
Proceeds from settlement of net investment hedge 859 —
Purchases of marketable securities available-for-sale — (13,860)
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities available-for-sale — 41,490
Net cash used in investing activities (5,264) (4,390)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under stock compensation plan 638 4,825
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt — 15,000
Principal payments on long-term debt (4,628) (19,628)
Net borrowings on revolving line of credit (108) —
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation 321 7,525
Dividends paid (2,764) (2,503)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (6,541) 5,219

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (4) 853
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 12,452 (1,954)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 50,760 21,022
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 63,212 $ 19,068


-5-

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and do not include all of the
disclosures normally required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for financial statements contained in Lindsay Corporation’s (the
“Company”) annual Form 10-K filing. Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008.
In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect all adjustments of a normal
recurring nature necessary to present a fair statement of the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the respective
interim periods. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or results expected by the Company for a full year.
Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements describe various elements of the financial statements and the accounting
policies, estimates, and assumptions applied by management. While actual results could differ from those estimated by management in the
preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements, management believes that the accounting policies, assumptions, and estimates
applied promote the representational faithfulness, verifiability, neutrality, and transparency of the accounting information included in the
condensed consolidated financial statements. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior financial statements and notes to conform to the
current year presentation. These reclassifications were not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
Except as described below, no changes were made to the Company’s accounting policies disclosed in Note A of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2008.
Fair Value Measurements – As described in Note 9, Fair Value Measurements , the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 were effective as of
September 1, 2008 for the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, as well as for other assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a
recurring basis in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The FASB has provided for a one-year deferral of the implementation of
this standard for certain nonfinanical assets and liabilities. Assets and liabilities subject to this deferral include goodwill, intangible assets, and
long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessments, and nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a
business combination. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
(2) Net Earnings per Share
Basic net earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net
earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus dilutive potential common shares
outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of stock options and restricted stock units to the extent they are not
anti-dilutive. Performance stock units are excluded from the calculation of dilutive potential common shares until the performance conditions
have been satisfied. At May 31, 2009, the performance conditions for the Company’s outstanding performance stock units had not been
satisfied.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings per Share , requires that certain equity instruments granted by the
Company be treated as potential common shares outstanding in computing diluted net earnings per share. The Company’s diluted common
shares outstanding reported in each period include the dilutive effect of restricted stock units and in-the-money options, and is calculated based
on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee
must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the
amount of excess tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when exercised are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.
There were 37,465 and 32,044 restricted stock units excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine
months ended May 31, 2009, respectively, since their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. There were no anti-dilutive options or restricted
stock units for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2008.

-6-

(3) Comprehensive Income
The accumulated other comprehensive income, net, shown in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets includes the unrealized gain (loss) on
cash flow hedges, unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, changes in the transition obligation and net actuarial losses from the defined
benefit pension plan and the accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment, net of hedging activities. The following table shows the
difference between the Company’s reported net earnings and its comprehensive income:

Three months ended Nine months ended
May 31, May 31,
$ in thousands 2009 2008 2009 2008
Comprehensive income:
Net earnings $ 5,269 $ 14,107 $ 11,741 $ 28,153

Other comprehensive income (1) :
Unrealized net gain on available for sale securities, net of tax — — — 14
Defined Benefit Pension Plan, net of tax 27 25 81 76
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax (607) 81 (192) (1,527)
Foreign currency translation, net of hedging activities 6,545 687 (2,616) 4,556
Total comprehensive income $ 11,234 $ 14,900 $ 9,014 $ 31,272

(1) Net of tax (benefit) expense of ($191) and $225 for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2009, respectively. Net of tax (benefit)
expense of $431 and ($607) for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2008, respectively.

(4) Income Taxes
It is the Company’s policy to report income tax expense for interim periods using an estimated annual effective income tax rate. However, the
tax effects of significant or unusual items are not considered in the estimated annual effective tax rate. The tax effects of such discrete events
are recognized in the interim period in which the events occur.
The Company recorded income tax expense of $2.6 million and $5.5 million for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2009,
respectively. The Company recorded income tax expense of $6.2 million and $14.2 million for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2008,
respectively. The estimated effective tax rate used to calculate income tax expense before discrete items was 34.7% and 34.6% for the periods
ended May 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
For the three months ended May 31, 2008, the Company recorded a discrete item resulting in $1.1 million of additional tax benefit due to
the correction of previously recognized tax expense related to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code that had been incorrectly recorded.
For the nine months ended May 31, 2009, the Company recorded two discrete items that reduced income tax expense for the period. The
first item was a benefit of $0.1 million relating to the reversal of previously recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions recorded under
FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes , relating to taxation of the Company’s Brazilian
subsidiary. This reversal was recorded due to the expiration of the statute of limitations without any actual tax liability being assessed. The
second item was a benefit of $0.4 million resulting from recording actual income tax expense that was lower than the estimated year end
income tax provision. For the nine months ended May 31, 2008, the Company recorded a discrete item resulting in $0.5 million of additional
tax benefit due to the correction of previously recognized tax expense related to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code that had been
incorrectly recorded.

(5) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for the Company’s Lindsay,
Nebraska inventory and two warehouses in Idaho and Texas. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method for inventory at the
Company’s Omaha, Nebraska warehouse, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Barrier Systems, Inc. (“BSI”) and Watertronics, LLC and non-U.S.
warehouse locations. Cost is determined by the weighted average cost method for inventory at the Company’s other operating locations in
Washington State, France, Brazil, Italy and South Africa. At all locations, the Company reserves for obsolete, slow moving, and excess
inventory by estimating the net realizable value based on the potential future use of such inventory.

-7-

$ in thousands 2009 2008 2008
Inventory:
FIFO inventory $ 23,610 $ 32,743 $ 24,867
LIFO reserves (7,864) (6,143) (8,203)
LIFO inventory 15,746 26,600 16,664

Weighted average inventory 18,180 19,749 20,568
Other FIFO inventory 21,896 15,860 17,586
Obsolescence reserve (1,467) (1,091) (1,409)
Total inventories $ 54,355 $ 61,118 $ 53,409

The estimated percentage distribution between major classes of inventory before reserves is as follows:

2009 2008 2008
Raw materials 10% 15% 9%
Work in process 10% 11% 8%
Finished goods and purchased parts 80% 74% 83%
(6) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, as follows:

$ in thousands 2009 2008 2008
Operating property, plant and equipment:
Land $ 2,266 $ 2,301 $ 2,269
Buildings 25,778 23,613 23,893
Equipment 60,090 57,277 58,382
Other 6,895 7,939 6,661
Total operating property, plant and equipment 95,029 91,130 91,205
Accumulated depreciation (54,691) (51,828) (51,144)
Total operating property, plant and equipment, net $ 40,338 $ 39,302 $ 40,061

Leased property:
Machines 4,148 3,632 3,597
Barriers 16,227 15,636 16,210
Total leased property $ 20,375 $ 19,268 $ 19,807
Accumulated depreciation (3,749) (1,913) (2,297)
Total leased property, net $ 16,626 $ 17,355 $ 17,510

Property, plant and equipment, net $ 56,964 $ 56,657 $ 57,571

Depreciation expense was $1.9 million and $1.6 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008, and $5.7 million and $4.6 million
for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

-8-

(7) Credit Arrangements
Euro Line of Credit
The Company’s wholly-owned European subsidiary, Lindsay Europe, has an unsecured revolving line of credit with Societe Generale, a
European commercial bank, under which it could borrow up to 2.3 million Euros, which equates to approximately USD $3.3 million as of
May 31, 2009, for working capital purposes (the “Euro Line of Credit”). As of May 31, 2009 and 2008 and August 31, 2008, there was
$1.6 million, $1.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, outstanding on the Euro Line of Credit, which was included in notes payable on the
consolidated balance sheets. Under the terms of the Euro Line of Credit borrowings, if any, bear interest at a floating rate in effect from time to
time designated by the commercial bank as the Euro Interbank Offered Rate plus 150 basis points (all inclusive, 2.4% at May 31, 2009).
Unpaid principal and interest is due by January 31, 2010, which is the termination date of the Euro Line of Credit.

BSI Term Note
The Company entered into an unsecured $30.0 million Term Note and Credit Agreement, effective June 1, 2006, with Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. (the “BSI Term Note”) to partially finance the acquisition of BSI. Borrowings under the BSI Term Note bear interest at a rate equal to
LIBOR plus 50 basis points. The Company has fixed the rate at 6.05% through an interest rate swap as described in Note 8, Financial
Derivatives . Principal is repaid quarterly in equal payments of $1.1 million over a seven-year period that began in September of 2006. The BSI
Term Note is due in June of 2013.

Snoline Term Note
The Company entered into an unsecured $13.2 million seven-year Term Note and Credit Agreement, effective December 27, 2006, with
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Snoline Term Note”) to partially finance the acquisition of Snoline S.P.A. (“Snoline”). Borrowings under the
Snoline Term Note are guaranteed by the Company and bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 50 basis points. The Snoline Term Note is
due in December of 2013. In connection with the Snoline Term Note, the Company entered into a cross currency swap transaction obligating
the Company to make quarterly payments of 0.4 million Euros per quarter over the same seven-year period as the Snoline Term Note and to
receive payments of $0.5 million per quarter over a seven year period commencing March 27, 2007. This is approximately equivalent to
converting the $13.2 million seven-year Snoline Term Note into a 10.0 million Euro seven-year term note at a fixed rate of 4.7% as described
in Note 8, Financial Derivatives .

Revolving Credit Agreement
The Company entered into an unsecured $30.0 million Revolving Credit Note and Credit Agreement, effective as of January 24, 2008,
with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”). The borrowings from the Revolving Credit Agreement will primarily be
used for working capital purposes and funding acquisitions. As of May 31, 2009 and 2008 and August 31, 2008, there was no outstanding
balance on the Revolving Credit Agreement.
Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 50 basis points. Interest is paid on a
monthly to quarterly basis depending on loan type. The Company also pays an annual commitment fee of 0.125% on the unused portion of the
Revolving Credit Agreement. Unpaid principal and interest is due by January 23, 2010, which is the termination date of the Revolving Credit
Agreement.
The BSI Term Note, the Snoline Term Note and the Revolving Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Notes”) each contain the same covenants,
including certain covenants relating to the Company’s financial condition. Upon the occurrence of any event of default of these covenants
specified in the Notes, including a change in control of the Company (as defined in the Notes), all amounts due thereunder may be declared to
be immediately due and payable.

-9-

Outstanding long-term debt consists of the following:

$ in thousands 2009 2008 2008
BSI Term Note $ 18,214 $ 22,500 $ 21,429
Snoline Term Note 8,954 10,839 10,367
Less current portion (6,171) (6,171) (6,171)
Total long-term debt $ 20,997 $ 27,168 $ 25,625

Interest expense was $0.5 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest expense was
$1.6 million and $2.2 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Principal payments due on long-term debt are as follows:

Due within:
1 year $ 6,171
2 years 6,171
3 years 6,171
4 years 6,171
5 years 2,484
Thereafter —
$ 27,168

(8) Financial Derivatives
The Company uses certain financial derivatives to mitigate its exposure to volatility in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The
Company uses these derivative instruments to hedge exposures in the ordinary course of business and does not invest in derivative instruments
for speculative purposes. Each derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, a hedge of a net investment, or remains undesignated. The
Company accounts for these derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activity (“SFAS No. 133”), which requires all derivatives to be carried on the balance sheet at fair value and to meet certain documentary and
analytical requirements to qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and effective as
cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (“OCI”), net of related income tax effects, and are reclassified to the income
statement when the effects of the item being hedged are recognized in the income statement. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments
that qualify as hedges of a net investment in foreign operations are recorded as a component of accumulated currency translation adjustment in
accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of related income tax effects. Changes in the fair value of undesignated hedges are
recognized currently in the income statement as other income (expense). All changes in derivative fair values due to ineffectiveness are
recognized currently in income.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment to SFAS
No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161),” which requires enhanced disclosures about how derivative and hedging activities affect the Company’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 was effective for the Company beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
This pronouncement resulted in enhanced disclosures, but did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

- 10 -

Financial derivatives consist of the following:

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
Asset (Liability) Derivatives
$ in thousands Balance Sheet Location 2009 2008 2008
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133:
Foreign currency forward contracts Other current assets $ — $ 24 $ 124
Interest rate swap Other current liabilities (650) (704) (684)
Interest rate swap Other noncurrent liabilities (897) (653) (746)
Cross currency swap Other current liabilities (380) (535) (324)
Cross currency swap Other noncurrent liabilities (772) (1,354) (750)
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under SFAS
No. 133 1 $(2,699) $(3,222) $ (2,380)

1 Accumulated other comprehensive income included losses, net of related income tax effects, of $0.6 million, $2.0 million and $0.9
million at May 31, 2009 and 2008, and August 31, 2008, respectively, related to deriviative contracts designed as hedging instruments
under SFAS No. 133.

Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
In order to reduce interest rate risk on the BSI Term Note, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. that is designed to convert the variable interest rate on the entire amount of this borrowing to a fixed rate of 6.05% per annum.
Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company receives variable interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate payments on an
amount equal to the outstanding balance of the BSI Term Note, thereby creating the equivalent of fixed-rate debt (see Note 7, Credit
Arrangements) . Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap designated as a hedging instrument that effectively offset the variability of
cash flows associated with variable-rate, long-term debt obligations are reported in AOCI, net of related income tax effects.
Similarly, the Company entered into a cross currency swap transaction with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. fixing the conversion rate of Euro to
U.S. dollars for the Snoline Term Note at 1.3195 and obligating the Company to make quarterly payments of 0.4 million Euros per quarter over
the same seven-year period as the Snoline Term Note and to receive payments of $0.5 million per quarter. In addition, the variable interest rate
was converted to a fixed rate of 4.7%. This is approximately equivalent to converting the $13.2 million seven-year Snoline Term Note into a
10.0 million Euro seven-year term note at a fixed rate of 4.7%. Under the terms of the cross currency swap, the Company receives variable
interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate payments, thereby creating the equivalent of fixed-rate debt (see Note 7, Credit
Arrangements) . Changes in the fair value of the cross currency swap designated as a hedging instrument that effectively offset the hedged risks
are reported in AOCI, net of related income tax effects.
In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the Company, at times, may enter into forward
exchange or option contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency for certain of our operations. This
activity primarily relates to economically hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory, sales of finished goods, and future
settlement of foreign denominated assets and liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the forward exchange contracts or option contracts
designated as hedging instruments that effectively offset the hedged risks are reported in AOCI, net of related income tax effects. The
Company had no forward exchange contracts or option contracts with cash flow hedging relationships outstanding at May 31, 2009 and 2008
or August 31, 2008.

- 11 -

Derivatives in SFAS No. 133 Cash Flow Hedging
Relationships

Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
May 31, May 31,
$ in thousands 2009 2008 2009 2008
Interest rate swap $ 95 $ 295 $ (136) $ (425)
Cross currency swap (702) (214) (56) (1,102)
Foreign currency forward contracts — — — —
Total 1 $ (607) $ 81 $ (192) $(1,527)

(1) Net of tax (benefit) of ($208) and ($105) for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2009, respectively.
Net of tax expense (benefit) of $375 and ($706) for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2008, respectively.

Amount of (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income
Location of Loss Three months ended Nine months ended
Reclassified from May 31, May 31,
$ in thousands AOCI into Income 2009 2008 2009 2008
Interest rate swap Interest Expense $ (248) $ (187) $ (739) $ (348)
Cross currency swap Interest Expense (80) (85) (239) (121)
Foreign currency forward contracts Revenue — — (15) —
Foreign currency forward contracts Other income (expense) — — (49) —
$ (328) $ (272) $(1,042) $ (469)

Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
(Ineffectiveness)
Gain/(Loss) Three months ended Nine months ended
Recognized in Income May 31, May 31,
$ in thousands (Ineffectiveness) 2009 2008 2009 2008
Interest rate swap Other income (expense) $ 21 $ 33 $ 103 $ (43)
Cross currency swap Other income (expense) — — — —
Foreign currency forward contracts Other income (expense) — — — —
$ 21 $ 33 $ 103 $ (43)

Net Investment Hedging Relationships
During fiscal 2008, the Company entered into Euro foreign currency forward contracts to hedge its Euro net investment exposure in its
foreign operations. At May 31 and August 31, 2008, the fair value of the outstanding foreign currency contract was a derivative asset of less
than $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, with a corresponding unrealized gain in currency translation adjustment in accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of related income tax effects of less than $0.1 million for both periods. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the
Company settled its only outstanding Euro foreign currency forward contract for a gain of $0.5 million, net of related income tax effects, which
was included in other comprehensive income as part of the currency translation adjustment. This foreign currency forward contract qualified as
a hedge of net investments in foreign operations under the provisions of SFAS No. 133. At May 31,

- 12 -

2009, accumulated currency translation adjustment in AOCI reflected after-tax gains of $1.2 million, net of related income tax effects of
$0.8 million related to settled foreign currency forward contracts. For the three months and nine months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008, there
were no amounts recorded in the consolidated statement of operations related to ineffectiveness of Euro foreign currency forward contracts. At
May 31, 2009, the Company had no outstanding Euro foreign currency forward contracts with net investment hedging relationships.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
activity primarily relates to economically hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory, sales of finished goods, and future
settlement of foreign denominated assets and liabilities. Changes in the fair value of undesignated hedges are recognized currently in the
income statement as other income (expense). At May 31, 2009 and 2008 and August 31, 2008, the Company had no undesignated hedges
outstanding.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Amount Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Location of Three months ended Nine months ended
Gain/(Loss) May 31, May 31,
$ in thousands Recognized in Income 2009 2008 2009 2008
Foreign currency forward contracts Other income (expense) $(78) $— $68 $—

(9) Fair Value Measurements
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements , which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements was adopted by the Company effective September 1, 2008 for its financial assets and liabilities, as well as for
other assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Financial
Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) has provided for a one-year deferral of the implementation of this standard for certain nonfinanical
assets and liabilities. Assets and liabilities subject to this deferral include goodwill, intangible assets, and long-lived assets measured at fair
value for impairment assessments, and nonfinancial assets and liabilities initially measured at fair value in a business combination. The
adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 157 establishes the fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques based on observable and unobservable
data and categorizes the inputs into three levels, with the highest priority given to Level 1 and the lowest priority given to Level 3. The levels
are described below.
• Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
• Level 2 — Significant observable pricing inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly
observable as of the reporting date. Essentially, this represents inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data.
• Level 3 — Generally unobservable inputs, which are developed based on the best information available and may include the
Company’s own internal data.

- 13 -

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value based upon the level within the fair value
hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 31, 2009:

$ in thousands Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Cash and cash equivalents $63,212 $ — $— $63,212
Derivative Assets — — — —
Derivative Liabilities — (2,699) — (2,699)
(10) Commitments and Contingencies
In 1992, the Company entered into a consent decree with the Environmental Protection Agency of the United States Government (the “EPA”)
in which the Company committed to remediate environmental contamination of the groundwater that was discovered in 1982 through 1990 at
and adjacent to its Lindsay, Nebraska facility (the “site”). The site was added to the EPA’s list of priority superfund sites in 1989. Between
1993 and 1995, remediation plans for the site were approved by the EPA and fully implemented by the Company. Since 1998, the primary
remaining contamination at the site has been the presence of volatile organic chemicals in the groundwater. The current remediation process
consists of drilling wells into the aquifer and pumping water to the surface to allow these chemicals to be removed by aeration. In 2008, the
Company and the EPA conducted a periodic five-year review of the status of the remediation of the contamination of the site. In response to the
review, the Company and its environmental consultants are in the process of developing a supplemental remedial action work plan that will
allow the Company and the EPA to better identify the boundaries of the contaminated groundwater and determine whether the contaminated
groundwater is being contained by current and planned wells that pump and aerate it. The Company accrues the anticipated cost of remediation
where the obligation is probable and can be reasonably estimated. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company accrued incremental
costs of $0.7 million for additional environmental monitoring and remediation in connection with the current ongoing supplemental remedial
action work plan. Amounts accrued and included in balance sheet liabilities related to the remediation actions were $1.0 million, $0.3 million
and $0.3 million at May 31, 2009 and 2008, and August 31, 2008, respectively. Although the Company has accrued all reasonably estimable
costs of completing the remediation actions defined in the supplemental remedial action work plan, it is possible additional actions could be
requested or mandated by the EPA at any time, resulting in the recognition of additional related expenses.
(11) Retirement Plan
The Company has a supplemental non-qualified, unfunded retirement plan for six former employees. Plan benefits are based on the
participant’s average total compensation during the three highest compensation years of employment during the ten years immediately
preceding the participant’s retirement or termination. This unfunded supplemental retirement plan is not subject to the minimum funding
requirements of ERISA. The Company has purchased life insurance policies on four of the participants named in this supplemental retirement
plan to provide partial funding for this liability. Components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s supplemental retirement plan
include:

May 31, May 31,
$ in thousands 2009 2008 2009 2008
Net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost $ — $ 10 $ — $ 31
Interest cost 87 84 260 251
Net amortization and deferral 44 41 131 122
Total net periodic benefit cost $ 131 $ 135 $ 391 $ 404

- 14 -

(12) Warranties
The Company generally warrants its products against certain manufacturing and other defects. These product warranties are provided for
specific periods and/or usage of the product. The accrued product warranty costs are for a combination of specifically identified items and other
incurred, but not identified, items based primarily on historical experience of actual warranty claims. This reserve is classified within other
current liabilities.
The following tables provide the changes in the Company’s product warranties:

Three months ended
May 31,
$ in thousands 2009 2008
Warranties:
Product warranty accrual balance, beginning of period $ 1,598 $ 1,927
Liabilities accrued for warranties during the period 778 1,214
Warranty claims paid during the period (689) (834)
Product warranty accrual balance, end of period $ 1,687 $ 2,307

Nine months ended
May 31,
$ in thousands 2009 2008
Warranties:
Product warranty accrual balance, beginning of period $ 2,011 $ 1,644
Liabilities accrued for warranties during the period 2,164 2,310
Warranty claims paid during the period (2,488) (1,647)
Product warranty accrual balance, end of period $ 1,687 $ 2,307

(13) Industry Segment Information
The Company manages its business activities in two reportable segments:
Irrigation: This segment includes the manufacture and marketing of center pivot, lateral move, and hose reel irrigation systems as well as
various water pumping stations and controls. The irrigation segment consists of eight operating segments that have similar economic
characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria of SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,
(“SFAS No. 131”).
Infrastructure: This segment includes the manufacture and marketing of movable barriers, specialty barriers and crash cushions, providing
outsource manufacturing services and the manufacturing and selling of large diameter steel tubing. The infrastructure segment consists of three
operating segments that have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria of SFAS No. 131.
The accounting policies of the two reportable segments are described in the “Accounting Policies” section of Note A to the consolidated
financial statements contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008. The Company evaluates the
performance of its reportable segments based on segment sales, gross profit, and operating income, with operating income for segment
purposes excluding general and administrative expenses (which include corporate expenses), interest income, interest expense, other income
and expenses, and income taxes. Operating income for segment purposes does include selling expenses, engineering and research expenses and
other overhead charges directly attributable to the segment. There are no inter-segment sales. Certain segment reporting prescribed by SFAS
No. 131 is not shown as this information cannot be reasonably disaggregated by segment and is not utilized by the Company’s management.
The Company had no single customer representing 10% or more of its total revenues during the three or nine months ended May 31,
2009 or 2008, respectively.

- 15 -

Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following table:

May 31, May 31,
$ in thousands 2009 2008 2009 2008
Operating revenues:
Irrigation $ 66,362 $120,554 $200,750 $259,686
Infrastructure 18,216 23,008 62,095 68,222
Total operating revenues $ 84,578 $143,562 $262,845 $327,908

Operating income:
Irrigation $ 12,732 $ 26,409 $ 35,103 $ 52,098
Infrastructure 1,805 2,153 5,618 11,484
Segment operating income 14,537 28,562 40,721 63,582
Unallocated general and administrative expenses (7,000) (8,112) (21,837) (20,763)
Interest and other income, net 371 (142) (1,661) (488)
Earnings before income taxes $ 7,908 $ 20,308 $ 17,223 $ 42,331

Total Capital Expenditures:
Irrigation $ 702 $ 1,079 $ 4,673 $ 2,929
Infrastructure 270 2,672 1,475 8,091
$ 972 $ 3,751 $ 6,148 $ 11,020
Total Depreciation and Amortization:
Irrigation $ 1,079 $ 1,064 $ 3,330 $ 2,869
Infrastructure 1,527 1,284 4,587 3,778
$ 2,606 $ 2,348 $ 7,917 $ 6,647

2009 2008 2008
Total Assets:
Irrigation $189,234 $198,124 $201,522
Infrastructure 115,086 103,362 125,355
$304,320 $301,486 $326,877

(14) Share Based Compensation
The Company accounts for awards of share-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, (as
revised in 2004), Share-Based Payment , (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for
all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. The Company’s current share-based
compensation plan, approved by the stockholders of the Company, provides for awards of stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units,
stock appreciation rights, performance shares and performance stock units to employees and non-employee directors of the Company. In
connection with the restricted stock units and performance stock units, the Company is accruing compensation expense based on the estimated
number of shares expected to be issued utilizing the most current information available to the Company at the date of the financial statements.
Share-based compensation expense was $0.6 million and $1.1 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Share-
based compensation expense was $1.5 million and $2.4 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

- 16 -

ITEM 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements that are not historical are
forward-looking and reflect expectations for future Company conditions or performance. In addition, forward-looking statements may be made
orally or in press releases, conferences, reports, on the Company’s worldwide web site, or otherwise, in the future by or on behalf of the
Company. When used by or on behalf of the Company, the words “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “believe”, “intend”, “will”, and similar
expressions generally identify forward-looking statements. The entire section entitled “Market Conditions and Fiscal 2009 Outlook” should be
considered forward-looking statements. For these statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed in the “Risk
Factors” section in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2008. Readers should not place undue reliance
on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results or conditions, which may not occur
as anticipated. Actual results or conditions could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical
results, due to the risks and uncertainties described herein, as well as others not now anticipated. The risks and uncertainties described herein
are not exclusive and further information concerning the Company and its businesses, including factors that potentially could materially affect
the Company’s financial results, may emerge from time to time. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update
forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.

Accounting Policies
In preparing the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles,
management must make a variety of decisions, which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. These decisions include the
selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In making these
decisions, management applies its judgment based on its understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and the Company’s
historical experience. As discussed in Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements, effective September 1, 2008.
The Company’s accounting policies that are most important to the presentation of its results of operations and financial condition, and
which require the greatest use of judgments and estimates by management, are designated as its critical accounting policies. See further
discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies under Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Company’s year ended August 31, 2008. Management
periodically re-evaluates and adjusts its critical accounting policies as circumstances change. There were no changes in the Company’s critical
accounting policies during the nine months ended May 31, 2009.

Overview
Lindsay Corporation (“Lindsay” or the “Company”) is a leading designer and manufacturer of self-propelled center pivot and lateral move
irrigation systems that are used principally in the agricultural industry to increase or stabilize crop production while conserving water, energy,
and labor. The Company has been in continuous operation since 1955, making it one of the pioneers in the automated irrigation industry.
Through the acquisition of Watertronics, Inc. (“Watertronics”) in January 2008, the Company entered the market for water pumping stations
and controls which provides further opportunities for integration with irrigation control systems. The Company also manufactures and markets
various infrastructure products, including moveable barriers for traffic lane management, crash cushions, preformed reflective pavement tapes
and other road safety devices. In addition, the Company’s infrastructure segment produces large diameter steel tubing, and provides outsourced
manufacturing and production services for other companies. Industry segment information about Lindsay is included in Note 13 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements.
Lindsay, a Delaware corporation, maintains its corporate offices in Omaha, Nebraska, USA. The Company’s principal irrigation
manufacturing facilities are located in Lindsay, Nebraska, USA. The Company also has international

- 17 -

irrigation production and sales facilities in France, Brazil, South Africa, and China, which provide it with important bases of operations in key
international markets. Lindsay Europe SAS, located in France, was acquired in March 2001 and manufactures and markets irrigation equipment
for the European market. Lindsay America do Sul Ltda., located in Brazil, was acquired in April 2002 and manufactures and markets irrigation
equipment for the South American market. Lindsay Manufacturing Africa, (PTY) Ltd., located in South Africa, was organized in
September 2002 and manufactures and markets irrigation equipment for the southern African market. The Company also leases office space
and a warehouse in China which are used in marketing irrigation equipment in China.
Watertronics, located in Hartland, Wisconsin, designs, manufactures, and services water pumping stations and controls for the golf,
landscape, agricultural and municipal markets. Watertronics has been in business since 1986 and was acquired by the Company in
January 2008.
Lindsay has two additional irrigation operating subsidiaries. Irrigation Specialists, Inc. (“Irrigation Specialists”) is a retail irrigation
dealership based in Washington State that operates at three locations. Irrigation Specialists was acquired by the Company in March 2002 and
provides a strategic distribution channel in a key regional irrigation market. Lindsay Transportation, Inc., located in Lindsay, Nebraska,
primarily provides delivery of irrigation equipment in the U.S.
Barrier Systems, Inc. (“BSI”), located in Rio Vista, California, manufactures movable barrier products, specialty barriers and crash
cushions. BSI has been in business since 1984 and was acquired by the Company in June 2006. In November 2007, the Company completed
the acquisition of certain assets of Traffic Maintenance Attenuators, Inc. and Albert W. Unrath, Inc. through a wholly owned subsidiary of BSI.
The assets acquired primarily relate to patents that enhance the Company’s highway safety product offering globally.
Snoline S.P.A. (“Snoline”), located in Milan, Italy, was acquired in December 2006, and is engaged in the design, manufacture and sale
of road marking and safety equipment for use on roadways.

- 18 -

Results of Operations
For the Three Months ended May 31, 2009 compared to the Three Months ended May 31, 2008
The following section presents an analysis of the Company’s operating results displayed in the condensed consolidated statements of
operations for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008. It should be read together with the industry segment information in Note 13 to
the condensed consolidated financial statements:

Three months ended Percent
May 31, Increase
$ in thousands 2009 2008 (Decrease)
Consolidated
Operating revenues $84,578 $143,562 (41.1)%
Cost of operating revenues $63,509 $106,460 (40.3)%
Gross profit $21,069 $ 37,102 (43.2)%
Gross margin 24.9% 25.8%
Operating expenses (1) $13,532 $ 16,652 (18.7)%
Operating income $ 7,537 $ 20,450 (63.1)%
Operating margin 8.9% 14.2%
Interest expense $ (465) $ (787) (40.9)%
Interest income $ 200 $ 346 (42.2)%
Other income (expense), net $ 636 $ 299 112.7%
Income tax provision $ 2,639 $ 6,201 (57.4)%
Effective income tax rate (3) 34.7% 34.6%
Net earnings $ 5,269 $ 14,107 (62.6)%
Irrigation Equipment Segment
Segment operating revenues $66,362 $120,554 (45.0)%
Segment operating income (2) $12,732 $ 26,409 (51.8)%
Segment operating margin (2) 19.2% 21.9%
Infrastructure Products Segment
Segment operating revenues $18,216 $ 23,008 (20.8)%
Segment operating income (2) $ 1,805 $ 2,153 (16.2)%

(1) Includes $7.0 million and $8.1 million of unallocated general and administrative expenses for the three months ended May 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
(2) Excludes unallocated general & administrative expenses.
(3) Effective tax rate before discrete items. Discrete items include a tax benefit of $1.1 million for the three months ended May 31, 2008.
Revenues
Operating revenues for the three months ended May 31, 2009 decreased by $59.0 million to $84.6 million compared with $143.6 million for
the three months ended May 31, 2008. The decrease is attributable to a $54.2 million decrease in irrigation equipment revenues and a
$4.8 million decrease in infrastructure revenues.
Domestic irrigation equipment revenues for the three months ended May 31, 2009 of $41.7 million decreased $37.4 million compared to
the same period last year. The decline in domestic irrigation equipment revenues was mostly due to a decline in the number of systems shipped
compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Commodity prices improved during the fiscal third quarter with corn increasing approximately
25% and soybeans approximately 40% from March 2009 prices. Even with healthy increases in commodity prices, corn remained
approximately 25% and soybeans were about 10% below prices at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2008. In addition, USDA projections for
2009 Net Farm Income indicate a 20% decline when compared to 2008 estimates, although the projections remain 9% above the ten

- 19 -

year average. According to USDA reports, farmers’ balance sheets remain strong and financing for irrigation equipment purchases remains
available, yet most have remained conservative regarding capital equipment purchases. International irrigation equipment revenues for the three
months ended May 31, 2009 of $24.7 million decreased 40% from $41.5 million as compared to the same prior year period. Exports were down
in most regions driven by general economic conditions, lower commodity prices and funding availability in developing markets. Revenue from
the Company’s international irrigation business units in Brazil, South Africa and France were also significantly lower as compared to the third
quarter of fiscal 2008.
Infrastructure products segment revenues for the three months ended May 31, 2009 of $18.2 million decreased $4.8 million from the
same prior year period. The decrease in infrastructure revenues in the quarter is primarily attributable to revenues decreasing approximately
35% in the Company’s Diversified Manufacturing and Tubing business unit as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Revenues in this
market decreased significantly due to lower sales of tubing to manufacturers of grain handling equipment, also affected by farmers’ sentiment
regarding equipment purchases. BSI revenues were also lower in the third quarter as compared to the same quarter last year due to a lag in
spending on government infrastructure projects.
Gross Margin
Gross profit was $21.1 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009, a decrease of $16.0 million as compared to the three months ended
May 31, 2008. Gross margin was 24.9% for the three months ended May 31, 2009 compared to 25.8% for the same prior year period. Gross
margin on irrigation products decreased during the quarter as compared to the three months ended May 31, 2008 resulting from significantly
reduced factory volume. Infrastructure gross margin increased slightly due to a favorable shift in product mix.
Operating Expenses
The Company’s operating expenses of $13.5 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009 were $3.2 million lower than the same prior
year period, reflecting significant reductions in personnel related expenses. In the third quarter, the Company continued to make appropriate
reductions in staffing and other expenses. The Company believes it has right-sized the business for current market conditions and does not
anticipate significant further reductions at this time.
Interest, Other Income (Expense), net and Taxes
Interest expense during the three months ended May 31, 2009 decreased by $0.3 million compared to the same prior year period. The decrease
in interest expense is due to principal reductions on the Company’s two outstanding term notes. In addition, the Company had an outstanding
balance of $15.0 million on its revolving line of credit for a portion of the prior year’s third quarter compared to having no outstanding
balances during the third quarter of fiscal 2009.
Interest income for the three months ended May 31, 2009 of $0.2 million remained essentially flat compared to the prior year period.
Other income, net during the three months ended May 31, 2009 increased by $0.3 million compared with the same prior year period.
This primarily resulted from an increase in foreign currency transaction gains.
The Company recorded income tax expense of $2.6 million for the three months ended May 31, 2009 compared to income tax expense of
$6.2 million for the three months ended May 31, 2008. For the three months ended May 31, 2008, the Company recorded a discrete item
resulting in $1.1 million of additional tax benefit due to the correction of previously recognized tax expense related to Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code that had been incorrectly recorded.
Net Earnings
Net earnings were $5.3 million or $0.42 per diluted share for the three months ended May 31, 2009 compared with $14.1 million or $1.15 per
diluted share for the same prior year period. The Company had operating income of $7.5 million for the three months ending May 31, 2009
compared to $20.5 million for the three months ending May 31, 2008, which reduction was due primarily to a decline in revenues and gross
margins.

- 20 -

For the Nine Months Ended May 31, 2009 compared to the Nine Months Ended May 31, 2008

Nine months ended Percent
May 31, Increase
$ in thousands 2009 2008 (Decrease)
Consolidated
Operating revenues $262,845 $327,908 (19.8)%
Cost of operating revenues $199,851 $241,472 (17.2)%
Gross profit $ 62,994 $ 86,436 (27.1)%
Gross margin 24.0% 26.4%
Operating expenses (1) $ 44,110 $ 43,617 1.1%
Operating income $ 18,884 $ 42,819 (55.9)%
Operating margin 7.2% 13.1%
Interest expense $ (1,570) $ (2,207) (28.9)%
Interest income $ 741 $ 1,199 (38.2)%
Other income (expense), net $ (832) $ 520 (260.0)%
Income tax provision $ 5,482 $ 14,178 (61.3)%
Effective income tax rate (3) 34.7% 34.6%
Net earnings $ 11,741 $ 28,153 (58.3)%
Irrigation Equipment Segment
Segment operating revenues $200,750 $259,686 (22.7)%
Infrastructure Products Segment
Segment operating revenues $ 62,095 $ 68,222 (9.0)%

(1) Includes $21.8 million and $20.8 million of unallocated general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
(2) Excludes unallocated general & administrative expenses.
(3) Effective tax rate before discrete items. Discrete items include a tax benefit of $0.5 million for each of the nine month periods ended
May 31, 2009 and 2008.
Revenues
Operating revenues for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 decreased by $65.1 million to $262.8 million compared with $327.9 million for
the nine months ended May 31, 2008. The decrease is attributable to a $58.9 million decrease in irrigation equipment revenues and a
$6.1 million decrease in infrastructure segment revenues.
Domestic irrigation equipment revenues for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 of $128.6 million decreased $38.5 million compared to
the same period last year. Strong first fiscal quarter domestic irrigation equipment revenues resulted from the sizeable order backlog for
irrigation equipment which had existed at the end of fiscal 2008. However, the increased domestic irrigation equipment revenues in the first
quarter were more than offset by the decrease in revenues in the second and third quarters due to factors discussed in the three month
discussion above. International irrigation equipment revenues for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 decreased $20.4 million as compared to
the first nine months of fiscal 2008. International irrigation also benefited from a strong first quarter as exports were up in all regions due to the
high year-end backlog. The first quarter revenue from the Company’s business units in Brazil, South Africa, and France were also significantly
higher as compared to the prior year’s first quarter. However, the first fiscal quarter increases in international irrigation equipment revenues
were more than offset by lower second and third quarter revenues due to factors discussed in the three month discussion above.
Infrastructure products segment revenues of $62.1 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 represented a decrease of $6.1 million from
the same prior year period. For the nine month period, revenue decreased at BSI by 23% due to less project oriented business while Snoline
revenues increased 12% reflecting stronger sales of road-marking tape products and crash cushions in the European market.

- 21 -

Gross Margin
Gross profit for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 was $63.0 million, a decrease of $23.4 million as compared to the same prior year period.
Gross margin percentage for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 decreased to 24.0% from the 26.4% achieved during the same prior year
period. Gross margin on irrigation products decreased during the nine months ended May 31, 2009 as compared to the nine months ended
May 31, 2008 resulting from reduced factory volume. Infrastructure margins decreased primarily due to the relatively greater decline in
revenues from the sale of higher margin quick move barriers.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses during the first three quarters of fiscal 2009 rose by $0.5 million or 1% from the same prior year period. The increase is
primarily due to the inclusion of $1.8 million of incremental operating expenses at Watertronics, which was acquired in January of 2008, an
additional $1.0 million of operating expenses related to increased facility costs and a system upgrade at BSI, and $0.7 million of incremental
expenses for additional monitoring and remediation of an EPA work plan at the Company’s Lindsay, Nebraska facility in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009. These increases were partially offset by lower personnel related costs. On an annualized basis, the personnel related expense
reductions that have been made are estimated to be approximately $4.2 million, with most of the reductions having been realized in the first and
second quarters of fiscal 2009.
Interest, Other Income (Expense), net, and Taxes
Interest expense during the nine months ended May 31, 2009 of $1.6 million decreased $0.6 million from the $2.2 million recognized during
the same period of fiscal 2008. The decrease in interest expense is due to principal reductions on the Company’s two outstanding term notes. In
addition, the Company had an outstanding balance of $15.0 million on its revolving line of credit for a portion of the prior year’s second and
third quarter compared to having no outstanding balances during the first nine months of fiscal 2009.
Interest income during the nine months ended May 31, 2009 decreased by $0.5 million compared to the same prior year period. The
decrease in interest income is primarily due to earning a lower interest rate on investments of the Company’s cash balances.
Other expense, net during the nine months ended May 31, 2009 increased by $1.4 million when compared with the same prior year
period. This primarily resulted from foreign currency transaction losses realized from the volatility of exchange rates during the first nine
months of fiscal 2009.
The Company recorded income tax expense of $5.5 million and $14.2 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The estimated effective tax rate used to calculate income tax expense before discrete items was 34.7% and 34.6% for the nine
months ended May 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the nine months ended May 31, 2009, the Company recorded two discrete items that
reduced income tax expense for the period. The first item was a benefit of $0.1 million due to the reversal of previously recorded liabilities for
uncertain tax positions recorded under FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes , relating to
taxation of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary. This reversal was recorded due to the expiration of the statute of limitations without any actual
tax liability being assessed. The second item was a benefit of $0.4 million resulting from recording actual income tax expense that was lower
than the estimated year end income tax provision. For the nine months ended May 31, 2008, the Company recorded a discrete item resulting in
$0.5 million of additional tax benefit due to the correction of previously recognized tax expense related to Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code that had been incorrectly recorded.
Net Earnings
Net earnings were $11.7 million or $0.94 per diluted share for the nine months ended May 31, 2009 compared with $28.2 million or $2.29 per
diluted share for the same prior year period. The Company’s operating income fell to $18.9 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2009
compared to $42.8 million for the first three quarters of fiscal 2008 due primarily to a decline in revenues, decline in gross margins, and higher
operating costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company requires cash for financing its receivables and inventories, paying operating costs and capital expenditures, and for dividends.
The Company meets its liquidity needs and finances its capital expenditures from its available cash and funds provided by operations along
with borrowings under four credit arrangements that are described in Note 7 of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 22 -

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled $63.2 million at May 31, 2009 compared with $19.1 million at May 31, 2008 and
$50.8 million at August 31, 2008.
The Company currently maintains two bank lines of credit with Wells Fargo, N.A. and Societe Generale to provide additional working
capital or to fund acquisitions, if needed. The Company entered into an unsecured $30.0 million Revolving Credit Note and Credit Agreement,
effective as of January 24, 2008, with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”). As of May 31, 2009 and 2008 and
August 31, 2008, there was no outstanding balance on the Revolving Credit Agreement.
Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 50 basis points. Interest is repaid on a
monthly or quarterly basis depending on loan type. The Company also pays an annual commitment fee of 0.125% on the unused portion of the
Revolving Credit Agreement. Unpaid principal and interest is due by January 23, 2010, which is the termination date of the Revolving Credit
Agreement.
The Company’s wholly-owned European subsidiary, Lindsay Europe, has an unsecured revolving line of credit with Societe Generale, a
European commercial bank, under which it could borrow up to 2.3 million Euros, which equates to approximately $3.3 million as of May 31,
2009, for working capital purposes (the “Euro Line of Credit”). As of May 31, 2009 and 2008 and August 31, 2008, there was $1.6 million,
$1.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, outstanding on the Euro Line of Credit, which was included in other current liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets. Under the terms of the Euro Line of Credit borrowings, if any, bear interest at a floating rate in effect from time to
time designated by the commercial bank as the Euro Interbank Offered Rate plus 150 basis points (all inclusive, 2.4% at May 31, 2009).
Unpaid principal and interest is due by January 31, 2010, which is the termination date of the Euro Line of Credit.
The Company also has two term loan arrangements that it used to finance previous acquisitions. The Company entered into an unsecured
$30.0 million Term Note and Credit Agreement, each effective as of June 1, 2006, with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (collectively, the “BSI Term
Note”) to partially finance the acquisition of BSI. Borrowings under the BSI Term Note bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 50 basis
points. However, this variable interest rate has been converted to a fixed rate of 6.05% through an interest rate swap agreement with the lender.
Principal is repaid quarterly in equal payments of $1.1 million over a seven-year period that commenced in September, 2006. The BSI Term
Note is due in June of 2013.
On December 27, 2006, the Company entered into an unsecured $13.2 million seven-year Term Note and Credit Agreement (the
“Snoline Term Note”) with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in conjunction with the acquisition of Snoline. Borrowings under the Snoline Term Note
are guaranteed by the Company and bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 50 basis points. The Snoline Term Note is due in December of
2013. In connection with the Snoline Term Note, the Company entered into a cross currency swap transaction obligating the Company to make
quarterly payments of 0.4 million Euros per quarter over the same seven-year period as the Snoline Term Note and to receive payments of
$0.5 million per quarter. In addition, the variable interest rate was converted to a fixed rate of 4.7%. This is approximately equivalent to
converting the $13.2 million seven-year Snoline Term Note into a 10.0 million Euro seven-year term note at a fixed rate of 4.7%.
The BSI Term Note, the Snoline Term Note and the Revolving Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Notes”) each contain the same
covenants, including certain covenants relating to Lindsay’s financial condition. These include maintaining a funded debt to EBITDA ratio, a
fixed charge coverage ratio and a current ratio (all as defined in the Notes) at specified levels. Upon the occurrence of any event of default of
these covenants specified in the Notes, including a change in control of the Company (as defined in the Notes), all amounts due under the
Notes may be declared to be immediately due and payable. At May 31, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all loan covenants.
In light of the relatively recent and ongoing significant changes in credit market liquidity and the general slowdown in the global
economy, the Company still believes its current cash resources, projected operating cash flow, and remaining capacity under its bank lines of
credit are sufficient to cover all of its expected working capital needs, planned capital expenditures, dividends, and other cash requirements,
excluding potential acquisitions. In addition, risk of receivable collectability has increased as global economic conditions have softened. In
response, the Company continuously monitors the receivable portfolio and takes aggressive collection actions when required.
Cash flows provided by operations totaled $24.3 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2009 compared to $3.6 million used in
operations during the same prior year period. Cash provided by operations improved $27.9 million due to a decrease in cash used for working
capital items resulting from lower business activities, and an increase in cash provided by noncurrent assets and liabilities, partially offset by a
decrease in cash provided from net income.
Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $5.3 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2009 compared to cash flows used in
investing activities of $4.4 million during the same prior year period. Cash used for investing activities in 2009 included $6.1 million used for
the purchase of property, plant and equipment partially offset by proceeds of $0.9 million from the settlement of a net investment hedge. Cash
used in investing activities in 2008 included $21.0 million for the acquisition of a business in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, $13.9 million
for the purchase of marketable

- 23 -

securities and $11.0 million for the purchase of property, plant and equipment. Cash used in 2008 was partially offset by proceeds of
$41.5 million from maturities of marketable securities. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2009, excluding possible expansion of the leased barrier
and barrier-transfer machine fleet, are estimated to be approximately $9.0 to $10.0 million. The planned expenditures include equipment for the
planned start-up in China, manufacturing equipment replacement, tooling, equipment, and facilities for identified efficiency improvements, and
leasehold improvements for the new Omaha office. The Company’s management does maintain flexibility to modify the amount and timing of
some of the planned expenditures in response to economic conditions.
Cash flows used in financing activities totaled $6.5 million during the nine months ended May 31, 2009 compared to cash flows provided
by financing activities of $5.2 million during the same prior year period. The increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to a
$7.2 million decrease in excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation and a $4.2 million decrease in proceeds from the issuance of
common stock under the stock compensation plan.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
There have been no material changes in the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments as described in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008.
Market Conditions and Fiscal 2009 Outlook
During the first three quarters of fiscal 2009, the Company continued to be faced with global recessionary concerns, lower agricultural
commodity prices and instability in the global financial markets that have impacted our customers and our suppliers. These factors have
impacted potential customers’ willingness to invest in agricultural irrigation equipment, and impacted government agencies’ ability to fund
road and bridge infrastructure projects in the near-term. Agricultural conditions have changed from the same time last year, as commodity
prices for corn have decreased approximately 25%, soybeans have decreased approximately 10% and wheat prices have decreased
approximately 20%. Economic conditions for U.S. farmers have been difficult during fiscal 2009 driven by the worldwide economic crisis. The
February 12, 2009, USDA projections for 2009 Net Farm Income show a 20% decline when compared to the 2008 estimate, although at
$71.2 billion 2009 projections are 9% above the ten year average. Although agricultural commodity prices improved during the fiscal third
quarter, farmers remained cautious about making investments in capital goods. Farmers have been driven to analyze their production costs and
capital investments carefully and have remained cautious awaiting clearer indications of improving farm economics. As farmers become more
confident in their income potential, the Company expects to see increased investment in improving farm efficiency. In the infrastructure
segment, government spending on highway infrastructure projects also improved during the third quarter of fiscal 2009, however the stimulus
funds have had less of an impact on demand to-date than expected. The Company has also responded to the contracted market activities with
reductions in its workforce and overall spending in all of its operations.
As of May 31, 2009, the Company had an order backlog of $40.2 million compared with $84.4 million at May 31, 2008 and
$92.3 million at August 31, 2008. The backlog at May 31, 2009, includes approximately $19.0 million of quick move barrier for the road
project in Mexico City that was previously disclosed during the second quarter of fiscal 2009. This project has been delayed pending resolution
of issues between the contractor and the local government. At this point, the Company cannot estimate when or if the issues between the
contractor and the local government will be resolved.
The global drivers of increasing food production, improving water-use efficiency, expanding biofuel production, expanding interest in
reducing environmental impacts and improving transportation infrastructure, continue to be drivers of demand for the Company’s products and
the Company believes that its current financial resources and capabilities are sufficient to weather the current economic instability. In addition,
the Company’s focus on improving cash flow has resulted in increasing cash and cash equivalents by $44.1 million to $63.2 million compared
with the third quarter of last year, as well as reducing debt by $6.2 million over the same period.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141R”). SFAS No. 141R establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141R also establishes disclosure
requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R will be effective for the
Company for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after September 1, 2009. The Company will assess the effect of this
pronouncement on any future acquisitions by the Company as they occur.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP
No. FAS 142-3”). FSP No. FAS 142-3 requires companies estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset to consider their historical
experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the

- 24 -

absence of historical experience, to consider assumptions that market participants would use about renewal or extension as adjusted for SFAS
No. 142’s, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, entity-specific factors. FSP No. FAS 142-3 will be effective for the Company beginning in
the first quarter of its fiscal year 2010. Management is currently assessing the effect of this pronouncement on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS No. 157-4, Determining the Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (“FSP SFAS 157-4”). This
FSP provides additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly
decreased in relation to normal market activity, as well as additional guidance on circumstances which may indicate a transaction is not orderly.
FSP SFAS 157-4 amends SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements to require interim disclosures of the inputs and valuation techniques used
to measure fair value reflecting changes in the valuation techniques and related inputs. FSP SFAS 157-4 will be effective for the Company’s
fiscal year ending August 31, 2009. The Company does not expect this pronouncement to have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). This FSP extends the requirements of SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting
periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 also amend APB Opinion
No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. FSP FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1 will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending August 31, 2009. This pronouncement will result in enhanced
disclosures in the Company’s future reports, but is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 141R-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business
Combination That Arise from Contingencies , (“FSP SFAS 141R-1”). This FSP amends and clarifies SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations , to require that an acquirer recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business
combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement
period. If the acquisition-date fair value of such an asset acquired or liability assumed cannot be determined, the acquirer should apply the
provisions of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies , to determine whether the contingency should be recognized at the acquisition date or
after it. FSP SFAS 141R-1 will be effective for the Company for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
September 1, 2009. The Company will assess the effect of this pronouncement on any future acquisitions by the Company as they occur.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS No. 165”). SFAS No. 165 establishes general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. SFAS No. 165 will be effective for the Company for its fiscal year ending August 31, 2009. The Company does not expect this
pronouncement to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and Hierarchy of GAAP (“SFAS
No. 168”). SFAS No. 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and establishes the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification TM as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities
and Exchange Commission under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS
No. 168 will be effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning September 1, 2009. The Company does not expect this pronouncement
to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company uses certain financial derivatives in accordance with its policies to mitigate its exposure to volatility in interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. The Company uses these derivative instruments to hedge exposures in the ordinary course of business and does not
invest in derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The Company also monitors counter-party credit risk associated with its derivative
instruments. The counter-party credit risk under these interest rate and foreign currency agreements is not considered to be significant.
The Company has manufacturing operations in the United States, France, Brazil, Italy and South Africa. The Company has sold products
throughout the world and purchases certain of its components from third-party international suppliers. Export sales made from the United
States are principally U.S. dollar denominated. In addition, a majority of the

- 25 -

Company’s revenue generated from operations outside the United States is denominated in local currency. Accordingly, these sales are not
subject to significant foreign currency transaction risk. At times, export sales may be denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. The
Company’s most significant transactional foreign currency exposures are the Euro, the Brazilian real, and the South African rand in relation to
the U.S. dollar. Fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies create exposures, which can adversely affect the Company’s results of
operations.
activity primarily relates to economically hedging against foreign currency risk in sales of finished goods and future settlement of foreign
denominated assets and liabilities.
In order to reduce translation exposure resulting from translating the financial statements of its international subsidiaries into U.S.
dollars, the Company, at times, utilizes Euro foreign currency forward contracts to hedge its Euro net investment exposure in its foreign
operations. During the first quarter of its fiscal 2009, the Company settled its one outstanding Euro foreign currency forward contract for an
after-tax gain of $0.5 million which was included in other comprehensive income as part of the currency translation adjustment, net of tax. This
foreign currency forward contract qualified as a hedge of net investments in foreign operations under the provisions of SFAS No. 133. At
May 31, 2009, the Company had no outstanding Euro foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges of net investments in foreign
operations.
In order to reduce interest rate risk on the $30.0 million BSI Term Note, the Company has entered into an interest rate swap agreement
with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. that is designed to convert the variable interest rate on the entire amount of this borrowing to a fixed rate of
6.05% per annum. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company receives variable interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate
payments on an amount equal to the outstanding balance of the BSI Term Note, thereby creating the equivalent of fixed-rate debt.
Similarly, the Company entered into a cross currency swap transaction fixing the conversion rate of Euros to U.S. dollars for the Snoline
Term Note at 1.3195 and obligating the Company to make quarterly payments of 0.4 million Euros per quarter over the same seven-year period
as the Snoline Term Note and to receive payments of $0.5 million per quarter. In addition, the variable interest rate was converted to a fixed
rate of 4.7%. This is approximately equivalent to converting the $13.2 million seven-year Snoline Term Note into a 10.0 million Euro seven-
year term note at a fixed rate of 4.7%. Under the terms of the cross currency swap, the Company receives variable interest rate payments and
makes fixed interest rate payments, thereby creating the equivalent of fixed-rate debt.

ITEM 4 – Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and the participation of
the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e).
Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of May 31,
2009.
Additionally, the CEO and CFO determined that there has not been any change to the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 – Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of its business operations, the Company is involved, from time to time, in commercial litigation, employment
disputes, administrative proceedings, and other legal proceedings. None of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, is expected to
have a material effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.
Environmental Matters
In 1992, the Company entered into a consent decree with the Environmental Protection Agency of the United States Government (the “EPA”)
in which the Company committed to remediate environmental contamination of the groundwater that was discovered in 1982 through 1990 at
and adjacent to its Lindsay, Nebraska facility (the “site”). The site was added to the EPA’s list of priority superfund sites in 1989. Between
1993 and 1995, remediation plans for the site were approved by the EPA and fully implemented by the Company. Since 1998, the primary
remaining contamination at the site has been

- 26 -

the presence of volatile organic chemicals in the groundwater. The current remediation process consists of drilling wells into the aquifer and
pumping water to the surface to allow these chemicals to be removed by aeration. In 2008, the Company and the EPA conducted a periodic
five-year review of the status of the remediation of the contamination of the site. In response to the review, the Company and its environmental
consultants are in the process of developing a supplemental remedial action work plan that will allow the Company and the EPA to better
identify the boundaries of the contaminated groundwater and determine whether the contaminated groundwater is being contained by current
and planned wells that pump and aerate it. The Company accrues the anticipated cost of remediation where the obligation is probable and can
be reasonably estimated. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company accrued incremental costs of $0.7 million for additional
environmental monitoring and remediation in connection with the current ongoing supplemental remedial action work plan. Amounts accrued
and included in balance sheet liabilities related to the remediation actions were $1.0 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million at May 31, 2009 and
2008, and August 31, 2008, respectively. Although the Company has accrued all reasonably estimable costs of completing the remediation
actions defined in the supplemental remedial action work plan, it is possible additional actions could be requested or mandated by the EPA at
any time, resulting in the recognition of additional related expenses.

ITEM 1A – Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors as described in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008.

ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Company made no repurchases of its common stock under the Company’s stock repurchase plan during the quarter ended May 31, 2009;
therefore, tabular disclosure is not presented. From time to time, the Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the Company to repurchase
shares of the Company’s common stock. Under this share repurchase plan, the Company has existing authorization to purchase, without further
announcement, up to 881,139 shares of the Company’s common stock in the open market or otherwise.

- 27 -

ITEM 6 – Exhibits

3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2006.

3.2 Restated By-Laws of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on November 6, 2007.

4.1 Specimen Form of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) of the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2006.

31.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

31.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

32.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18
U.S.C. Section 1350.

* - filed herein

- 28 -

SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 9th day of July 2009.

LINDSAY CORPORATION

By: /s/ DAVID B. DOWNING
Name: David B. Downing
Title: Chief Financial Officer and
President International Division

- 29 -

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION
I, Richard W. Parod, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lindsay Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ RICHARD W. PAROD President and Chief Executive Officer
Richard W. Parod July 9, 2009

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION
I, David B. Downing, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lindsay Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DAVID B. DOWNING Chief Financial Officer and President International Division
David B. Downing July 9, 2009

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Lindsay Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter
ended May 31, 2009, I, Richard W. Parod, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, David B. Downing, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ RICHARD W. PAROD
Richard W. Parod
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ DAVID B. DOWNING
David B. Downing
Chief Financial Officer and President International Division

July 9, 2009
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Q2 2009 Earning Report of Lindsay Corporation

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

Viewers also liked (6)

Similar to Q2 2009 Earning Report of Lindsay Corporation (20)

More from earningreport earningreport (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Q2 2009 Earning Report of Lindsay Corporation