Quadripartitioned neutrosophic pythagorean lie subalgebra

Corresponding Author: radharmat2020@gmail.com
http://dx.doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2021.293069.1157
E-ISSN: 2717-3453 | P-ISSN: 2783-1442
|
Abstract
1 | Introduction
The concept of Lie groups was first introduced by Sophus Lie in nineteenth century through his
studies in geometry and integration methods for differential equations. Lie algebras were also
discovered by him when he attempted to classify certain smooth subgroups of a general linear group.
The importance of Lie algebras in mathematics and physics has become increasingly evident in recent
years. In mathematics, Lie theory remains a robust tool for studying differential equations, special
functions and perturbation theory. It’s noted that Lie theory has applications not only in mathematics
and physics but also in diverse fields like continuum mechanics, cosmology and life sciences. Lie
algebra has been utilized by electrical engineers, mainly within the mobile robot control [5].
Lie algebra has also been accustomed solve the problems of computer vision. Fuzzy structures
are related to theoretical soft computing, especially Lie algebras and their different classifications,
have numerous applications to the spectroscopy of molecules, atoms and nuclei. One amongst the
key concepts within the applying of Lie algebraic method in physics is that of spectrum generating
algebras and their associated dynamic symmetries. The most important advancements within the
fascinating world of fuzzy sets started with the work of renowned scientist Zulqarnain et al. [14] with
new directions and ideas.
Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications
www.journal-fea.com
J. Fuzzy. Ext. Appl. Vol. 2, No. 3 (2021) 283–296.
Paper Type: Research Paper
Quadripartitioned Neutrosophic Pythagorean Lie
Subalgebra
R. Radha 1 , A. Stanis Arul Mary2
1 Research Scholar, Department of Mathematics, Nirmala College for Women, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India;
radharmat2020@gmail.com.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Nirmala College for Women, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India;
stanisarulmary@gmail.com.
Citation:
Radha, R., & Arul Mary, A. S. (2021). Quadripartitioned neutrosophic pythagorean lie subalgebra.
Journal of fuzzy extension and application, 2 (3), 283-296.
Accept: 04/08/2021
Revised: 02/08/2021
Reviewed: 29/05/2021
Received: 01/05/2021
A Quadripartitioned Neutrosophic Pythagorean (QNP) set is a powerful general format framework that generalizes the
concept of Quadripartitioned Neutrosophic Sets and Neutrosophic Pythagorean Sets. In this paper, we apply the notion
of quadripartitioned Neutrosophic Pythagorean sets to Lie algebras. We develop the concept of QNP Lie subalgebras
and QNP Lie ideals. We describe some interesting results of QNP Lie ideals.
Keywords: QNP Lie ideal; QNP Lie subalgebra; Lie ideal; Lie subalgebra.
Licensee Journal
of Fuzzy Extension and
Applications. This article
is an open access article
distributed under the
terms and conditions of
the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY)
license
(http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by/4.0).

284
Radha
and
Arul
Mary
|J.
Fuzzy.
Ext.
Appl.
2(3)
(2021)
283-296
Wang et al. [6] defined SVN sets as a generalization of fuzzy sets and intuitionistic fuzzy sets [4].
Algebraic structures have a major place with vast applications in various disciplines.
Neutrosophic set has been applied to algebraic structures. Fuzzification of Lie algebras has been
discussed in [1]–[3]. The idea of single valued neutrosophic Lie algebra was investigated by Akram et al.
[7]. Quadripartitioned Neutrosophic Set and its properties were introduced by Smarandache [12].
During this case, indeterminacy is split into two components: contradiction and ignorance membership
function. The Quadripartitioned Neutrosophic Set is a particular case of Refined Neutrosophic Set.
Smarandache [12] extended the Neutrosophic Set to refined [n-valued] neutrosophic set, and to refined
neutrosophic logic, and to refined neutrosophic probability, i.e. the truth value T is refined/split into
types of sub-truths such as T1, T2, …, similarly indeterminacy I is refined/split into types of sub-
indeterminacies I1, I2, …, and the falsehood F is refined/split into sub-falsehood F1, F2 ,...
We’ve now extended our research during this Pentapartitioned neutrosophic set as a space. Also we
introduced the concept of Penta partitioned neutrosophic Pythagorean set [8]-[14] and establish
variety of its properties in our previous work. During this paper, we apply the notion of
Quadripartitioned Neutrosophic Pythagorean (QNP) sets to Lie algebras.
In this paper, we develop the concepts of QNP Lie subalgebras and investigated some of its properties.
Furthermore, we have also studied the concept of QNP Lie ideals. We describe some interesting results
of QNP Lie ideals.
2| Preliminaries
Lie algebra [1] is a vector space L over a field F (equal to R or C) on which L ×L → L denoted
by (x, y) → [x, y] is defined satisfying the following axioms:
(L1) [x, y] is bilinear,
(L2) [x, x] = 0 for all x ∈L,
(L3) [[x, y], z] + [[y, z], x] + [[z, x], y] = 0 for all x, y, z ∈L (Jacobi identity).
Throughout this paper, L is a Lie algebra and F is a field. We note that the multiplication
in a Lie algebra is not associative, i.e., it is not true in general that [[x, y], z] = [x, [y, z]]. But it
is anti commutative, i.e., [x, y] = −[y, x]. A subspace H of L closed under [・, ・] will be called a
Lie subalgebra.
A fuzzy set μ: L → [0, 1] is called a fuzzy Lie ideal [1] of L if
I. μ(x + y) ≥ min{μ(x), μ(y)},
II. μ(𝛼x) ≥ μ(x),
III. μ([x, y]) ≥ μ(x),
hold for all x, y ∈L and 𝛼∈F.

285
Quadripartitioned
neutrosophic
pythagorean
Lie
subalgebra
Definition 1. [9]. Let R be a space of points (objects). A QNP set on a non-empty R is characterized by
truth membership function A1: R → [0, 1], contradiction membership function A2: R→ [0, 1], ignorance
membership function A4: R → [0, 1] and false membership function A5: R → [0, 1].
Thus, R = { <r, A1( r) ,A2( r), A4 ( r),A5( r)>} satisfies with the following conditions A1+A2+A4+A5≤
2, A1 + A5 ≤ 1,A2+A4 ≤ 1.Here A1,A2, A4, A5 are dependent neutrosophic components.
Definition 2. [7]. An SVN set N = (TN, IN, FN) on Lie algebra L is called an SVN Lie subalgebra if the
following conditions are satisfied:
I. TN(x + y) ≥ min(TN(x), TN(y)), IN(x + y) ≥ min(IN(x), IN(y)) and FN(x + y) ≤ max(FN(x), FN(y)),
II. TN(𝛼x) ≥ TN(x), IN(𝛼x) ≥ IN(x) and FN(𝛼x) ≤ FN(x),
III. TN ([x, y]) ≥ min {TN(x), TN(y)}, IN ([x, y]) ≥ min {IN(x), IN(y)} and FN ([x, y]) ≤ max {FN(x), FN(y)} for all x, y
∈L and 𝛼∈F.
Definition 3. [7]. A SVN set N = (TN, IN, FN) onL is called an SVN Lie ideal if it satisfies the Conditions
(I), (II) and the following additional condition:
Single-valued Neutrosophic Lie algebras
IV. TN([x, y]) ≥ TN(x), IN([x, y]) ≥ IN(x) and FN([x, y]) ≤ FN(x)
for all x, y ∈L.
From Condition (2) it follows that:
V. TN(0) ≥ TN(x), IN(0) ≥ IN(x), FN(0) ≤ FN(x),
VI. TN (−x) ≥ TN(x), IN (−x) ≥ IN(x), FN (−x) ≤ FN(x).
3 | Quadripartitioned Neutrosophic Pythagorean Lie Subalgebra
We define here QNP Lie subalgebras and QNP Lie ideal.
Definition 4. A QNP set R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) on is called a QNP Lie subalgebra ℒ if the following
conditions are satisfied:
I. A1 R (a + b) ≥ min (A1 R (a), A1 R (b)), A2 R (a + b) ≥ min (A2 R (a), A2 R (b)), A4 R (a + b) ≤ max (A4 R (a), A4 R
(b)), A5 R (a + b) ≤ max (A5 R (a), A5 R (b)),
II. A1 R (𝛽a) ≥ A1 R (a), A2 R (𝛽a) ≥ A2 R (a), A4 R (𝛽a) ≤ A4 R (a) and A5 R (𝛽a) ≤ A5 R (a).
III. A1 R ([a, b]) ≥ min (A1 R (a), A1 R (b)), A2 R ([a, b]) ≥ min (A2 R (a), A2 R (b)), A4 R ([a, b]) ≤ max (A4 R (a), A4
R (b)), A5 R ([a, b]) ≤ max (A5 R (a), A5 R (b)).
For all a, b ∈ ℒ and ∈ ℱ .
Definition 5. A QNP set R = (A1 R, A2 R, A3R , A4 R ,A5 R) on ℒ is called an QNP Lie ideal if it satisfies
the following Conditions (I) and (II) and the following additional conditions:
IV. A1 R ([a, b]) ≥ A1 R (a), A2 R ([a, b]) ≥ A2 R (a), A4 R ([a, b]) ≤ A4 R (a), A5 R ([a, b]) ≤ A5 R (a),
From (II), it follows that:
V. A1 R (0) ≥ A1 R (a), A2 R (0) ≥ A2 R (a), A4 R (0) ≤ A4 R (a) and A5 R (0) ≤ A5 R (a),
VI. A1 R (- a) ≥ A1 R (a), A2 R (- a) ≥ A2 R (a), A4 R (- a) ≤ A4 R (a) and A5 R (- a) ≤ A5 R (a).
Proposition 1. Every QNP Lie ideal is a QNP Lie subalgebra.

286
Radha
and
Arul
Mary
|J.
Fuzzy.
Ext.
Appl.
2(3)
(2021)
283-296
We note here that the converse of the above proposition does not hold in general as it can be seen in
the following example.
Example 1. Consider ℱ = ℝ. Let ℒ = ℜ3
= {(a, b, c): a, b, c ∈ ℝ } be the set of all three dimensional real
vectors which forms a QNP Lie algebra and define
ℜ3
x ℜ3
→ ℜ3
[a, b] → a x b,
Where x is the usual cross product. We define an QNP set R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R): ℜ3
→ [0,1] x [0,1]
x [0,1] x [0,1] by
A1 R (a, b, c)= {
1, if a = b = c = 0,
0.3, if a ≠ 0, b = c = 0,
0, otherwise
A2 R (a, b, c)= {
1, if a = b = c = 0,
0.2, if a ≠ 0, b = c = 0,
0, otherwise
A4 R (a, b, c)= {
0, if a = b = c = 0,
0.3, if a ≠ 0, b = c = 0,
1, otherwise
A5 R (a, b, c)= {
0, if a = b = c = 0,
0.5, if a ≠ 0, b = c = 0.
1, otherwise
Then R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) is an QNP Lie subalgebra of ℒ but R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) is not
an QNP Lie ideal of ℒ since
A1 R ([1,0,0) (1,1,1)]) = A1 R (0, -1, 1) = 0,
A2 R ([1,0,0) (1,1,1)]) = A2 R (0, -1, 1) = 0,
A4 R ([1,0,0) (1,1,1)]) = A4 R (0, -1, 1) = 1,
A5 R ([1,0,0) (1,1,1)]) = A5 R (0, -1, 1) = 1,
A1 R (1,0,0) = 0.2, A2 R (1,0,0) = 0.3, A4 R (1,0,0) = 0.3, A5 R (1,0,0) = 0.5.
That is,
A1 R ([1,0,0) (1,1,1)]) ≱ A1 R (1,0,0),
A2 R ([1,0,0) (1,1,1)]) ≱ A2 R (1,0,0),
A4 R ([1,0,0) (1,1,1)]) ≰ A4 R (1,0,0),
A5 R ([1,0,0) (1,1,1)]) ≰ A5 R (1,0,0).
Proposition 2. If R is an QNP Lie ideal of ℒ , then
I. A1 R (0) ≥ A1 R (a), A2 R (0) ≥ A2 R (a), A4 R (0) ≤ A4 R (a) and A5 R (0) ≤ A5 R (a),
II. A1 R ([a, b]) ≥ max {A1 R (a), A1 R (b)},

287
Quadripartitioned
neutrosophic
pythagorean
Lie
subalgebra
III. A2 R ([a, b]) ≥ max {A2 R (a), A2 R (b)},
IV. A4 R ([a, b]) ≤ min {A4 R (a), A4 R (b)},
V. A5 R ([a, b]) ≤ min {A5 R (a), A5 R (b)},
VI. A1 R ([a, b]) = A1 R (- [b, a]) = A1 R ([b, a]),
VII. A2 R ([a, b]) = A2 R (- [b, a]) = A2 R ([b, a]),
VIII. A4 R ([a, b]) = A4 R (- [b, a]) = A4 R ([b, a]),
IX. A5 R ([a, b]) = A5 R (- [b, a]) = A5 R ([b, a]).
For all a, b ∈ ℒ .
Proof. The proof follows from Definition 5.
Proposition 3. If {R i : 𝑖 𝜖 𝐽} is a family of QNP Lie algebra ofℒ , then ⋂ Ri= ( ∧ A1 Ri∧ A2Ri∨A4Ri∨A5 Ri)
is an QNP Lie ideal of ℒ where,
∧ A1 Ri (a) = inf {∧ A1 Ri (a) : i ϵ J, a ϵ ℒ } ,
∧ A2 Ri (a) = inf {∧ A2 Ri (a) : i ϵ J, a ϵ ℒ } ,
∨A4 Ri (a) = sup {∨ A4 Ri (a) : i ϵ J, a ϵ ℒ } ,
∨ A5 Ri (a) = sup {∨ A5 Ri (a) : i ϵ J, a ϵ ℒ } .
Definition 6. Let R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) be an QNP Lie subalgebra of ℒ and let (𝛼, 𝛽, 𝛿, 𝜗) [0,1] X
[0,1] X [0,1] X [0,1] with 𝛼 + 𝛽 + 𝛿 + 𝜗 ≤ 2 . Then level subset of R is defined as
𝑅(𝛼,𝛽,𝛿,𝜗)
= { 𝑎 𝜖 ℒ : A1(a) ≥ 𝛼 ,A2(a) ≥ 𝛽, A 4(a) ≤ 𝛿 ,A5(a) ≤ 𝜗},
are called (𝛼, 𝛽, 𝛾, 𝛿, 𝜗) level subsets of QNP set R. The set of all (𝛼, 𝛽, 𝛿, 𝜗) ∈ Im(A1R) X Im(A2R) X Im(A4R)
X Im(A5R) such that 𝛼 + 𝛽 + 𝛿 + 𝜗 ≤ 2 is known as image of R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R).
Note:
R(α,β,δ,ϑ)
= { a ϵ ℒ : A1(a) ≥ α ,A2(a) ≥ β, A 4(a) ≤ δ ,A5(a) ≤ ϑ},
R(α,β,δ,ϑ)
= { a ϵ ℒ : A1 (a) ≥ α} ∩ { a ϵ ℒ : A2(a)≥ β} ∩ { a ϵ ℒ : A 4(a) ≤ δ} ∩{ a ϵ ℒ : A5(a) ≤
ϑ},
R(α,β,δ,ϑ)
= U (A1 (a),α) ∩ U′
(A2(a), β) ∩ γ) ∩ L′( A 4(a),δ) ∩ L’’(A5(a),ϑ).
Theorem 1. An QNP set R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) of ℒ is an QNP lie ideal of ℒ iff 𝑅(𝛼,𝛽,𝛿,𝜗)
is a QNP
Lie ideal of ℒ for every (𝛼, 𝛽, 𝛾, 𝛿, 𝜗) [0,1] X [0,1] X [0,1] X [0,1] with 𝛼 + 𝛽 + 𝛿 + 𝜗 ≤ 3 .
Proposition 4. Let R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) be an QNP Lie ideal of ℒ and (r1, s1, u1, v1), (r2, s2, u2, v2)
∈ Im(A1R) X Im(A2R) X Im(A4R) X Im(A5R) with ri+ si+ ui +vi≤ 3 for i = 1,2. Then ℒ𝑅
(𝑟1,𝑠1,𝑢1,𝑣1)
=
ℒ𝑅
(𝑟2,𝑠2,𝑢2,𝑣2)
if and only if (r1, s1, u1, v1) = (r2, s2, u2, v2)
Theorem 2. Let K 0 ⊂K 1⊂K 2 ⊂K 3………⊂K n = L be a chain of QNP Lie ideals of a QNP Lie algebra
ℒ . Then there exists an QNP ideal A1 R of ℒ for which level subsets U (A1 (a),α), U′
(A2(a), β)
, L′( A 4(a), δ) and L’’(A5(a),𝜗) coincide with this chain.

288
Radha
and
Arul
Mary
|J.
Fuzzy.
Ext.
Appl.
2(3)
(2021)
283-296
Proof. Let { rk: k = 0,1,2…,n}, {s k:k = 0,1,….n} , {u k: k = 0,1,2…n} and {v k: k = 0,1,2…n} be finite
decreasing and increasing sequences in [0,1]. Let Let R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) be a QNP set in ℒ
defined by A1 R(K 0) = r 0, A2 R(K 0) = s 0, A4 R(K 0) = u 0, A5 R(K 0) = v 0, A1 R(K l:K l-1) = r l, A2 R(K
lK l-1) = s l, A4 R(K lK l-1) = u l,A5 R(K lK l-1) = v l, for 0 < 𝑙 ≤ 𝑛. Let a, b ∈ ℒ . If a ,b∈K lK l-1, then
a +b, 𝛽a, [a,b] ∈K l
A1 R (a + b) ≥ r k = min {A1 R (a), A1 R (b)},
A2 R (a + b) ≥ s k = min {A2 R (a), A2 R (b)},
A4 R (a + b) ≤ u k = max {A4 R (a), A4 R (b)},
A5 R (a + b) ≤ v k = max {A5 R (a), A5 R (b)},
A1 R (𝛼a) ≥ r k = A1 R (a), A2 R (𝛼a) ≥ s k = A2 R (a),
A4 R (𝛼a) ≤ u k = A4 R (a), A5 R (𝛼a) ≤ v k = A5 R (a),
A1 R ([a, b]) ≥ r k = A1 R (a), A2 R ([a, b]) ≥ s k = A2 R (a),
A4 R ([a, b]) ≤ u k = A4 R (a), A5 R ([a, b]) ≤ v k = A5 R (a).
For i> j, if a ∈ K i K i-1 and b ∈ K j K j-1, then A1 R (a) = ri = A1 R (b), A2 R (a) = si = A2 R (b),
A4 R (a) = u j = A4 R (b), A5 R (a) = v j = A5 R (b) and a +b, 𝛼a, [a, b] ∈ K I. Thus
A1 R (a + b) ≥ r i = min {A1 R (a), A1 R (b)},
A2 R (a + b) ≥ s i= min {A2 R (a), A2 R (b)},
A4 R (a + b) ≤ u j = max {A4 R (a), A4 R (b)},
A5 R (a + b) ≤ v j= max {A5 R (a), A5 R (b)},
A1 R (𝛼a) ≥ r i = A1 R (a), A2 R (𝛼a) ≥ s i= A2 R (a),
A4 R (𝛼a) ≤ u j = A4 R (a), A5 R (𝛼a) ≤ v j= A5 R (a),
A1 R ([a, b]) ≥ r i = A1 R (a), A2 R ([a, b]) ≥ s i = A2 R (a),
A4 R ([a, b]) ≤ u j = A4 R (a), A5 R ([a, b]) ≤ v j = A5 R (a).
Thus, we conclude that R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) is a QNP Lie ideal of a QNP Lie algebra ℒ and all
its non-empty level subsets are QNP Lie ideals.
Since Im (A1 R) = {r 0, r 1, r 2…..,rn }, Im (A2 R) = {s 0, s 1, s 2…..,s n },
Im (A4 R) = {u 0, u 1, u 2…..,u n }, Im (A5 R) = {v 0, v 1, v 2…..,v n }, level subsets of R forms chains:
U (A1 R , r 0) ⊂ U(A1 R , r 1) ⊂ ….. ⊂ U (A1 R , r n) = L,
U’ (A2 R , s 0) ⊂ U’(A2 R , s 1) ⊂ ….. ⊂ U’ (A2 R , s n) = L,

289
Quadripartitioned
neutrosophic
pythagorean
Lie
subalgebra
L’ (A4 R , u 0) ⊂ L’(A4 R , u 1) ⊂ ….. ⊂ L′(A4R , u n) = L,
L’’ (A5 R , v 0) ⊂ L’’(A5 R , v 1) ⊂ ….. ⊂ L′′(A5R , v n) = L.
Respectively. Indeed
U (A1 R , r 0) = { a ∈ ℒ: A1 R (a) ≥ r 0} = K 0,
U’ (A2 R , s 0) = { a ∈ ℒ: A2 R (a) ≥ s 0} = K 0,
L’ (A4 R , u 0) = { a ∈ ℒ: A4 R (a) ≤ u 0} = K 0,
L’’ (A5 R , v 0) = { a ∈ ℒ: A5 R (a) ≤ v 0} = K 0.
We prove that U(A1 R , r l) = U’(A2 R , s l) = L’(A4 R , u l) = L’’(A5 R , v l) = K l for 0 ≤ l ≤ n.
Clearly, K l⊆U(A1 R , r l), K l⊆ U’(A2 R , s l), K l⊆ L’(A4 R , u l), K l⊆ L’’(A5 R , v l).
If a ∈U(A1 R , r l), then A1 R (a) ≥ r l and for a ∉ K j , for j > l. Hence A1 R(a) ∈ {r 0, r 1, r 2…..,rl },
Which implies a ∈ j for some j ≤ l. Since K j⊂ K l, it follows that a ∈ K l .Consequently, U (A1 R , r l) = K
l for some 0 <l ≤ n.
If a ∈ U’ (A2 R , s l), then A2 R (a) ≥ s l and for a ∉ K j , for j > l. Hence A2 R(a) ∈ {s 0, s 1, s2…..,s l },
Which implies a ∈ K j for some j ≤ l. Since K j⊂ K l ,it follows that a ∈ K l .Consequently, U’(A2 R , s l)
= K l for some 0 <l ≤ n.
If a ∈ L’(A4 R , u l), then A4 R (a) ≤ u l and for a ∉ K m ,for m > l. Hence A4 R(a) ∈ {u 0, u 1,u2…..,u l },
Which implies a ∈ K m for some m ≤ l. Since K m⊂ K l ,it follows that a ∈ K l .
Consequently, L’ (A4 R , u l) = K l for some 0 <l ≤ n.
If a ∈ L’’(A5 R ,v l),then A5 R (a) ≤ v l and for a ∉ K m ,for m > l. Hence A5 R(a) ∈ {v 0, v 1,v2…..,v l },
Which implies a ∈ K m for some m ≤ l. Since K m⊂ K l ,it follows that a ∈ K l .
Consequently, L’’(A5 R , v l) = K l for some 0 <l ≤ n. This completes the proof.
Theorem 3. If R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) is an QNP Lie ideal of a QNP Lie algebra ℒ , then
A1 R (a) = sup {r ∈ [0,1] a ∈ U(A1R , r)},
A2 R (a) = sup {s ∈ [0,1] a ∈ U’(A2 R , s)},
A4 R (a) = inf {u ∈ [0,1] a ∈ L’(A4 R , u)},
A5 R (a) = inf {v ∈ [0,1] a ∈U(A5 R , v)},
for every a ∈ ℒ .

290
Radha
and
Arul
Mary
|J.
Fuzzy.
Ext.
Appl.
2(3)
(2021)
283-296
Definition 7. Let f be a map from a set ℒ 1 to a set ℒ 2. If R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) and
R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) are QNP sets in ℒ 1 and ℒ 2 respectively, then the preimage of R2 under f,
denoted by 𝑓− 1
(R2), is a QNP set defined by
𝑓− 1
(R2) = (𝑓− 1
(A1 R2),𝑓− 1
(A2 R2),𝑓− 1
(A4 R2),𝑓− 1
(A5 R2)).
Theorem 4. Let f :ℒ 1→ ℒ 2 be an onto homomorphisms of Lie algebras. If R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R)
is a QNP Lie ideal of ℒ 2, then the preimage
𝑓− 1
(R2) = (𝑓− 1
(A1 R2),𝑓− 1
(A2 R2),𝑓− 1
(A4 R2),𝑓− 1
(A5 R2)) under f is a QNP Lie ideal of ℒ1 .
Proof. The proof follows from Definitions 5 and 7.
Theorem 5. Let f :ℒ 1→ ℒ 2 be an epimorphisms of QNP Lie algebras. If R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) is
a QNP Lie ideal of ℒ 2, then the preimage 𝑓− 1
((R1)C) = (𝑓− 1
(R1))C
a QNP Lie ideal of ℒ 2 and R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) is the preimage of R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R)
under f. Then R2 is a QNP Lie ideal of ℒ 1.
Definition 8. Let ℒ 1 and ℒ 2 be two QNP Lie algebras and f be a mapping of ℒ 1 into ℒ 2. If R =
(A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) is a QNP set of ℒ 1, then the image of R1 under f is the QNP set in ℒ2 defined by
f(A1 R1)(b) = {
supa∈f− 1(b)A1R1(a), if f− 1
(b) ≠ 0,
0, otherwise
f(A2 R1)(b) = {
supa∈f− 1
(b)
A2R1(a), if f
− 1
(b) ≠ 0,
0, otherwise
f(A4 R1)(b) = {
infa∈f− 1(b)A4R1(a), if f − 1
(b) ≠ 0,
1, otherwise
f(A5 R1)(b) = {
infa∈f− 1(b)A5R1(a), if f − 1
(b) ≠ 0,
1, otherwise
for each b∈ ℒ 2
a QNP Lie ideal of ℒ 1, then f(R1) is a QNP Lie ideal of ℒ 2.
Definition 9. Let f :ℒ 1→ ℒ 2 be an homomorphisms of QNP Lie algebras, For any QNP set, If R =
(A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) is a QNP Lie ideal of ℒ 2, we define a PNP set Rf
= (A1R
f
, A2R
f
, A4R
f
, A5R
f
) in ℒ 1
by

291
Quadripartitioned
neutrosophic
pythagorean
Lie
subalgebra
A1R
f
(a) = A1 R (f(a)), A2R
f
(a) = A2 R (f(a)), A4R
f
(a) = A4 R (f(a)), A5R
f
(a) = A5 R (f(a)), for all a ∈ 𝓛 1 .
Lemma 1. Let f :ℒ1→ ℒ 2 be an homomorphisms of QNP Lie algebras, If R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) is a
QNP Lie ideal of ℒ 2, then Rf
= (A1R
f
, A2R
f
, A4R
f
, A5R
f
) is a QNP Lie ideal in ℒ 1 .
Proof. Let a, b ∈ ℒ 1𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝛽 ∈ ℱ . Then
A1R
f
(a + b) = A1R (f(a + b)) = A1R (f(a) + f(b)) ≥ min{ A1R (f(a)), A1R (f(b))} = min{A1R
f
(a),
A1R
f
(b)},
A2R
f
(a + b) = A2R (f(a + b)) = A2R (f(a) + f(b)) ≥ min{ A2R (f(a)), A2R (f(b))} = min{A2R
f
(a), A2R
f
(b)},
A4R
f
(a + b) = A4R (f(a + b)) = A4R (f(a) + f(b)) ≤ min{ A4R (f(a)), A4R (f(b))} = min{A4R
f
(a),
A4R
f
(b)},
A5R
f
(a + b) = A5R (f(a + b)) = A5R (f(a) + f(b)) ≤ min{ A5R (f(a)), A5R (f(b))} = min{A5R
f
(a),
A5R
f
(b)},
A1R
f
(βa) = A1R (f(βa)) = A1R (βf(a)) ≥ A1R (f(a)) = A1R
f
(a),
A2R
f
(βa) = A2R (f(βa)) = A2R (βf(a)) ≥ A2R (f(a)) = A2R
f
(a),
A4R
f
(βa) = A4R (f(βa)) = A4R (βf(a)) ≤ A4R (f(a)) = A4R
f
(a),
A5R
f
(βa) = A5R (f(βa)) = A5R (βf(a)) ≤ A5R (f(a)) = A5R
f
(a).
Similarly,
A1R
f
([a, b]) = A1 R (f[a, b]) = A1 R ([ f(a), f(b]) ≥ A1 R (f(a)) = A1R
f
(a),
A2R
f
([a, b]) = A2 R (f([a,b]) = A2 R ( [f(a), f(b)]) ≥ A2 R (f(a)) = A2R
f
(a),
A4R
f
([a, b]) = A4 R (f([a, b]) = A4 R ([f(a), f(b)]) ≤ A4 R (f(a)) = A4R
f
(a),
A5R
f
([a, b]) = A5 R (f([a, b]) = A5 R ([f(a), f(b)]) ≤ A5 R (f(a)) = A5R
f
(a).
This proves that 𝑅𝑓
= (𝐴1𝑅
𝑓
, 𝐴2𝑅
𝑓
, 𝐴4𝑅
𝑓
, 𝐴5𝑅
𝑓
) is a QNP Lie ideal in 𝓛 1 .
We now characterize the QNP Lie ideals of Lie algebras.
Theorem 8. Let f :ℒ 1→ ℒ 2 be an epimorphisms of QNP Lie algebras. Then 𝑅𝑓
= (𝐴1𝑅
𝑓
, 𝐴2𝑅
𝑓
, 𝐴4𝑅
𝑓
, 𝐴5𝑅
𝑓
)
is a QNP Lie ideal in 𝓛 1 iff R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R)is a QNP Lie ideal of 𝓛 2.
Definition 10. Let R = (A1R, A2R, A4R, A5R) be a QNP Lie ideal in ℒ . Define a inductively a sequences
of QNP Lie ideals in 𝓛 by 𝑅0
= R, 𝑅1
= [𝑅0
, 𝑅0
], 𝑅2
= [𝑅1
,𝑅1
],….. 𝑅𝑛
= [𝑅𝑛−1
,𝑅𝑛−1
].
𝑅𝑛
is called the n th derived QNP Lie ideal of ℒ . A series 𝑅0
⊇ 𝑅1
⊇ 𝑅2
⊇…..⊇ 𝑅𝑛
⊇ ⋯
is called derived series of a QNP Lie ideal R in ℒ .

292
Radha
and
Arul
Mary
|J.
Fuzzy.
Ext.
Appl.
2(3)
(2021)
283-296
Definition 11. A QNP Lie ideal R in is called a solvable QNP Lie ideal, if there exists a positive integer
n such that 𝑅0
⊇ 𝑅1
⊇ 𝑅2
⊇…..⊇ 𝑅𝑛
= (0,0,0)
Theorem 9. Homomorphic images of solvable QNP Lie ideals are solvable QNP Lie ideals.
Proof. Let f :ℒ1→ ℒ 2 be homomorphisms of QNP Lie algebras. Suppose that R = (A1R, A2R, A4R,
A5R) is a QNP Lie ideal of ℒ1. We prove by induction on n that f(𝑅𝑛
) ⊇ [𝑓(𝑅)]𝑛
, where n is any positive
integer. First we claim that f([R, A])⊇ [f( R ), f( R )]. Let y ∈ ℒ2. Then
f(<<A1 R , A1 R>>)(y) = sup {<<A1 R, A1 R>>(y)f(x) = y}
= sup{sup{min(A1 R(a), A1 R(b))a,b ∈ ℒ1,[a, b] = x, f(x) = y}}
= sup{min(A1 R(a), A1 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,,[a, b] = x, f(x) = y}}
= sup{min(A1 R(a), A1 R(b))a,b ∈ ℒ1,,[f(a), f(b)] = x}
= sup{min(A1 R(a), A1 R(b))a,b ∈ ℒ1,f(a) = u, f(b) = v,[u, v] = y}}
≥sup{min(supa∈f−1(u)A1 R(a), min(supb∈f−1(v)A1 R(b)[u, v] = y}
= sup{min{f(A1 R)(u),f(A1 R)(v))[u, v] = y}
= <<f(A1 R), f(A1 R)>>(y),
f(<<A2 R , A2 R>>)(y) = sup { <<A2 R, A2 R>>(y)f(x) = y}
= sup{sup{min(A2 R(a), A2 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,[a, b] = x, f(x) = y}}
= sup{min(A2 R(a), A2 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,,[a, b] = x, f(x) = y}}
= sup{min(A2 R(a), A2 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,,[f(a), f(b)] = x}
= sup{min(A2 R(a), A2 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,,f(a) = u, f(b) = v,[u, v] = y}}
≥sup{min(supa∈f−1(u) A2 R(a), min(supb∈f−1(v) A2 R(b)[u, v] = y}
= sup{min{f(A2 R)(u),f(A2 R)(v))[u, v] = y}
= <<f(A2 R), f(A2 R)>>(y),
f(<<A4 R , A4 R>>)(y) = inf { <<A4 R, A4 R>>(y)f(x) = y}
= inf{inf{max(A4R(a), A4 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,[a, b] = x, f(x) = y}}
= inf{max(A4 R(a), A4 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,[a, b] = x, f(x) = y}}
= inf {max(A4 R(a), A4 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,[f(a), f(b)] = x}
= inf{max(A4 R(a), A4 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,f(a) = u, f(b) = v,[u, v] = y}}
≤inf{max(infa∈f−1(u) A4 R(a), min(infb∈f−1(v) A4 R(b)[u, v] = y}

293
Quadripartitioned
neutrosophic
pythagorean
Lie
subalgebra
= inf{max{f(A4 R)(u),f(A4 R)(v))[u, v] = y}
= <<f(A4 R), f(A4 R)>>(y),
f(<<A5 R , A5 R>>)(y) = inf { <<A5 R, A5 R>>(y)f(x) = y}
= inf{inf{max(A5 R(a), A5 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,[a, b] = x, f(x) = y}}
= inf{max(A5 R(a), A5 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,[a, b] = x, f(x) = y}}
= inf {max(A5 R(a), A5 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,[f(a), f(b)] = x}
= inf{max(A5 R(a), A5 R(b))a, b ∈ ℒ1,f(a) = u, f(b) = v,[u, v] = y}}
≤inf{max(infa∈f−1(u) A5 R(a), min(infb∈f−1(v) A5 R(b)[u, v] = y}
= inf{max{f(A5 R)(u),f(A5 R)(v))[u, v] = y}
= <<f(A5 R), f(A5 R)>>(y).
Thus f([R, R]) ⊇ f(<<A,A>>) ⊇ <<f( R ), f( R )>> = [f( R ), f( R )].
Now for n> 1, we get f(Rn
)= f([Rn−1
,Rn−1
]) ⊇ [f(Rn−1
), f(Rn−1
)].
This completes the proof
Definition 12. Let R = (A1R, A2R, A4R ,A5R) be a QNP Lie ideal in ℒ . We define a inductively a sequences
of QNP Lie ideals in 𝓛 by 𝑅0= R, 𝑅1= [R,𝑅0], 𝑅2= [𝑅, 𝑅1]… .𝑅𝑛 = [𝑅,𝑅𝑛−1].
A series 𝑅0 ⊇ 𝑅1 ⊇ 𝑅2 ⊇…..⊇ 𝑅𝑛 ⊇ ⋯
is called descending central series of a QNP Lie ideal R in 𝓛 .
Definition 13. An QNP Lie ideal R is called a nilpotent QNP Lie ideal in 𝓛 , if there exists a positive
integer n such that 𝑅0 ⊇ 𝑅1 ⊇ 𝑅2 ⊇…..⊇ 𝑅𝑛= (0,0,0).
Theorem 10. Homomorphic image of a nilpotent QNP Lie ideal is a nilpotent QNP Lie ideal.
Proof. It is obvious
Theorem 14. Let K be a QNP Lie ideal of a QNP Lie algebra 𝓛 . If R = (A1R, A2 R, A4R ,A5 R) is a QNP
Lie ideal of 𝓛 , then the QNP set *R = (*A1 R, *A2 R, *A4 R ,*A5 R) of 𝓛 /K defined by
*A1R(a + K) = supx∈KA1R(a + x),
*A2R(a + K) = supx∈KA2R(a + x),
*A4R(a + K) = infx∈KA4R(a + x),
*A5R(a + K) =infx∈KA5R(a + x),
is a QNP Lie ideal of the quotient QNP Lie algebra 𝓛 /K of 𝓛 with respect to K.

294
Radha
and
Arul
Mary
|J.
Fuzzy.
Ext.
Appl.
2(3)
(2021)
283-296
Proof. Clearly,*R is defined. Let x + K, y + K ∈ 𝓛 / K. Then
*A1R((x + K) + (y + K)) = *A1 R((x + y) + K)
= supz∈KA1R((x + y) + z),
= supz=s+t∈KA1R((x + y) + (s + t)),
≥ sups,t∈Kmin{A1R(x + s), A1R(y + t)},
= min { sups∈KA1R(x + s),supt∈KA1R(y + t)},
= min{∗ A1R(x + s),∗ A1R(y + t)},
*A1R(𝛽(x + K) = *A1 R(𝛽x + K) = supz∈KA1R(βx + z) ≥ supz∈KA1R(x + z)=*A1 R(x + K).
*A1R([x + K, *A1 R(a + K) =supx∈KA1 R(a + x),
y + K]) = *A1R([x , y] + K) = supz∈KA1R([x,y] + z) ≥ supz∈KA1R([x, y] + z)=*A1 R(x + K).
Thus *A1 R is a PNP Lie ideal of 𝓛 / K. In a similar way, we can verify that *A2 R, *A4 R and *A5 R
PNP Lie ideals of ℒ /K. Hence *R = (*A1 R, *A2 R, *A4R ,*A5 R) is a QNP Lie ideal of 𝓛 /K.
Theorem 15. Let K be a QNP Lie ideal of a QNP Lie algebra 𝓛. Then there is a one-to=one
correspondence between the set of QNP Lie ideals R = (A1 R, A2 R, A4R ,A5 R) of 𝓛 such that R(0) =
A(s) for all s ∈ K and the set of all QNP Lie ideals *R = (*A1 R, *A2 R, *A4 R ,*A5 R) of 𝓛 /K.
Proof. Let R = (A1 R, A2 R, A4R ,A5 R) be QNP Lie ideal of ℒ . Using Theorem 3.27, we prove that
*A1 R, *A2 R, *A4R ,*A5 R defined by
*A1R(a + K) =supx∈KA1 R(a + x),
*A2R(a + K) = supx∈KA2 R(a + x),
*A4R(a + K) = infx∈KA4 R(a + x),
*A5R(a + K) =infx∈KA5 R(a + x),
are QNP Lie ideals of 𝓛 /K. Since A1R(0) = A1 R(s), A2 R(0) = A2 R(s),
A4R(0) = A4 R(s), A5 R(0) = A5 R(s) for all s ∈ K,
A1R(a + s) ≥ min(A1 R(a), A1 R(s)) = A1 R(a),
A2R(a + s) ≥ min(A2 R(a), A2 R(s)) = A2 R(a),
A4R(a + s) ≤ max(A4 R(a), A4 R(s)) = A4 R(a),
A5R(a + s) ≤ min(A5 R(a), A5 R(s)) = A5 R(a).
Again,

295
Quadripartitioned
neutrosophic
pythagorean
Lie
subalgebra
A1 R(a) = A1R(a + s - s) ≥ min(A1 R(a + s), A1 R(s)) = A1 R(a + s),
A2 R(a) = A2R(a + s - s) ≥ min(A2 R(a + s), A2 R(s)) = A2 R(a + s),
A4 R(a) = A4R(a + s - s) ≤ max(A4 R(a + s), A4 R(s)) = A4 R(a + s),
A5 R(a) = A5R(a + s - s) ≤ max(A5 R(a + s), A5 R(s)) = A5 R(a + s).
Thus R(a + s) = R(a) for all s ∈ K. Hence the correspondence R → *R is one- to -one. Let *R be a QNP
Lie ideal of 𝓛 / K and define a PNP set R = (A1 R, A2 R, A4R ,A5 R) in 𝓛 by
A1 R(a) = * A1R(a +K),A2 R(a) = * A2 R(a +K), A4 R(a) = * A4 R(a +K), A5 R(a) = * A5 R(a +K).
For a,b∈ ℒ , we have
A1R(a + b) = *A1 R((a + b) +K) = * A1 R((a +K) + (b + K)),
≥min{*A1 R(a + K), *A1 R(b + K)} ,
= min { A1 R(a ), A1 R(b)},
A1 R(βa) = * A1R(βa +K) ≥ * A1 R(a +K) = A1 R(a),
A1R([a, b]) = * A1 R([a,b] +K) = * A1 R([a + K, b + K]),
≥ * A1R(a +K) = A1 R(a ).
Thus A1 R is a QNP lie ideal of 𝓛 . In a similar way, we can verify that A2 R, A4 R and A5R are QNP
Lie ideals of 𝓛 . Hence R = (A1 R, A2 R, A4R ,A5 R) is a QNP Lie ideal of 𝓛 .
Note that A1 R(a) = * A1R(a +K),A2 R(a) = * A2 R(a +K), A4 R(a) = * A4 R(a +K), A5 R(a) = * A5R(a
+K).
This completes the proof.
4| Conclusion
In this article, we have discussed above QNP Lie subalgebra and QNP Lie ideals of a QNP Lie Algebra.
We have also investigated some of its properties of Quadripartitioned Neutrosophic Pythagorean Lie
ideals. In future, we are planned to study on Lie rings. We may also develop for heptapartitioned
neutrosophic sets and other hybrid sets.
References
Akram, M. (2006). Anti fuzzy Lie ideals of Lie algebras. Quasigroups and related systems, 14(2), 123-132.
Akram, M. (2007). Intuitionistic (S, T)-fuzzy Lie ideals of Lie algebras. Quasigroups and related
systems, 15(2), 201-218.
Akram, M. (2008). Generalized fuzzy Lie subalgebras. Journal of generalized lie theory and applications, 2(4),
261-268.
Atanassov, K. (2016). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International journal bioautomation, 20, 1.

296
Radha
and
Arul
Mary
|J.
Fuzzy.
Ext.
Appl.
2(3)
(2021)
283-296
Coelho, P., & Nunes, U. (2003). Lie algebra application to mobile robot control: a
tutorial. Robotica, 21(5), 483-493.
Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y., & Sunderraman, R. (2010). Single valued neutrosophic sets.
Infinite study.
Akram, M., Gulzar, H., & Shum, K. P. (2018). Single–valued neutrosophic lie algebra. Journal of
Mathematical research with applications. DOI: 10.3770/j.issn:2095-2651.2019.02.003
Radha, R., & Mary, A. S. A. (2021). Pentapartitioned neutrosophic pythagorean soft set. Infinite Study.
Mary, S. A. (2021). Pentapartitioned neutrosophic pythagorean set. International research journal on
advanced science hub, 3, 62-68.
Radha, R., & Mary, A. S. A. (2021). Heptapartitioned neutrosophic sets. International journal of creative
research thoughts (IJCRT), 9(2), 222-230.
Radha, R., Mary, A. S. A., & Smarandache, F. (2021). Quadripartitioned neutrosophic pythagorean
soft set. International journal of neutrosophic science (IJNS), 14(1), 9-23.
Smarandache, F. (1998). Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set, and logic: analytic synthesis & synthetic
analysis. Amer Res Press, Rehoboth, USA.
Smarandache, F. (2015). n – valued refined neutrosophic logic and its applications in physics. In
Unmatter plasma, relativistic oblique-length contraction factor, neutrosophic diagram and neutrosophic degree
of paradoxicity (pp. 40-53). Pons Publishing.
Zulqarnain, R. M., Xin, X. L., Siddique, I., Khan, W. A., & Yousif, M. A. (2021). TOPSIS method based
on correlation coefficient under pythagorean fuzzy soft environment and its application towards
green supply chain management. Sustainability, 13(4), 1642.

Quadripartitioned neutrosophic pythagorean lie subalgebra

More Related Content

Similar to Quadripartitioned neutrosophic pythagorean lie subalgebra (20)

More from Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Quadripartitioned neutrosophic pythagorean lie subalgebra