SlideShare a Scribd company logo
4
Most read
5
Most read
9
Most read
A Design Example for a Rectangular Concrete Tank
PCA Design Method
CVEN 4830/4434
University of Colorado, Boulder
Spring Semester 2008
Prepared by Ben Blackard
The Portland Cement Association (PCA) has publications for designing rectangular and circular
tanks. Some of the design provisions differ from that of the American Concrete Institute (ACI)
specifications. Many in the industry use these PCA design concepts, so we will adapt them for
our calculations as well. Much of the PCA publication is comprised of tables of coefficients for
calculating moment and shear in two-way slabs. These tables should simplify the calculations.
We will refer to the PCA Rectangular Concrete Tanks design manual as PCA-R, and the circular
tank design manual as PCA-C.
An additional safety factor is used for the loads called the “Sanitation Coefficient”, we will
denote it with SC for brevity. Note that this notation is not an industry standard. The purpose of
the sanitation coefficient is to indirectly reduce the stress, and thus the strain, in the steel
reinforcing. The result is lower strain in the concrete, and thus less cracking. The ultimate load
will be multiplied by SC, which has different values for different calculations:
1.3 for flexure
SC= 1.65 for direct tension (hoop tensile stress in reinforcing)
1.0 shear provided by concrete
1.3 for shear beyond that provided by concrete
Another change is the fluid load factor is 1.7 rather than 1.4 as stated in the ACI specification.
For the purposes of this class, the following load combinations and factors will be used:
Mu = 1.3(1.4D + 1.7F + 1.6H) for flexure
Pu = 1.65(1.4D + 1.7F + 1.6H) for direct tension (hoop tensile stress in reinforcing)
Pu = 1.0(1.4D + 1.7F + 1.6H) for direct compression (hoop compression stress in concrete)
Vu = 1.0(1.4D + 1.7F + 1.6H) shear provided by concrete
Vu = 1.3(1.4D + 1.7F + 1.6H) for shear beyond that provided by concrete
D = dead load F = fluid pressure H = earth pressure
Rectangular Concrete Tank Design Example
An open top concrete tank is to have three chambers, each measuring 20′×60′ as shown. The
wall height is 17′. The tank will be partially underground, the grade level is 10′ below the top of
the tank. The highest groundwater table is expected to be 4′ below grade. The fluid level inside
the tank is 15′.
20′20′
60′
20′
f′c = 3,500 psi fy = 60,000 psi
soil bearing capacity = 2,700 psf
Walls above the groundwater table should be designed using a lateral earth pressure equivalent to
that developed by a fluid weighing 45 pcf, below the groundwater table use 95 pcf.
Due to the settlement characteristics of the soil, it is recommended that the bearing pressure be
kept as constant as possible for the full tank loading scenario.
Assume the density of the fluid in the tank is 63 pcf.
Interior Wall Design
Boundary condition case 3 in chapter 2 of PCA-R will be used for determining the applied
moments to the tank walls (pages 2-17 thru 2-22). Consider the 15′ water depth to be the height
of the wall.
fixed
free
fixed
fixed
qb
a
a = 15′ b = 60′ b/a = 4.0 q = (15′)(63 pcf) = 945 psf
From page 2-18 of PCA-R, the maximum vertical moment coefficient is 149, looking at the Mx
table. This moment occurs at the center-bottom of the wall. Similarly, the My table gives a
maximum horizontal moment coefficient of 99, located at the top ends of the wall.
For the moment calculations qu = (1.3)(1.7)(945 pcf) = 2,089 psf
Mu = moment coefficient × qu × a2
/1000
Vertical Moment: coef = 149 Mu = 70,034 lb-ft/ft
Horizontal Moment: coef = 99 Mu = 46,533 lb-ft/ft
The maximum shear in the wall is obtained from the maximum shear coefficient from page 2-17
of PCA-R, in this case Cs = 0.50. The wall will be designed for the concrete to resist the entire
shear force.
For the shear calculation qu = (1.0)(1.7)(945 pcf) = 1,607 psf
Vu = Cs × qu ×a = (0.50)(1,607 psf)(15′) = 12,053 lb/ft
Note:
The moment in the wall varies considerably for different locations in the wall. The reinforcing
could differ at several locations for a highly efficient design. The thickness of the wall could
also vary, either tapering the wall or stepping the wall. However, for the sake of time, the
reinforcing will be kept consistent for the entire wall. One design for the vertical moments, and
the other for the horizontal moments. This is a common practice in engineering. Time is not
only saved for the design engineer, but also the detailers and construction crew saves time as
compared to a more complicated design. This design philosophy is entitled to change if
substantial material savings could be realized and if time permits.
Vertical Flexure Design of Interior Wall:
try a 14″ thick wall with 2″ clear concrete cover and #8 bars @ 6″
(design a 1′ wide vertical strip of wall)
bw = 12″ d = 14″ - 2″ - bar dia/2 = 11.5″ Ag = 168 in2
f′c = 3,500 psi fy = 60,000 psi As = 1.58 in2
( )cw1
ys
f0.85bβ
fA
c
′⋅⋅⋅
⋅
= = 3.124 in
φMn =( ) ⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛ ⋅
−⋅⋅⋅
2
cβ
dfA0.9 1
ys = 867,898 lb-in/ft = 72,325 lb-ft/ft
Mu = 70,034 lb-ft/ft φMn = 72,325 lb-ft/ft
minimum flexural steel
ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 s
y
w
A
f
db200
≤
⋅⋅
⇒ As.min = 0.46 in2
[flexure steel As = 1.58 in2
]
ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 sw
y
c
Adb
f
f3
≤⋅⋅
′⋅
⇒ As.min = 0.408 in2
[flexure steel As = 1.58 in2
]
minimum vertical wall steel
ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.003×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.504 in2
[total steel As = 3.16 in2
]
minimum steel for temperature and shrinkage
ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.005×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.84 in2
[total steel As = 3.16 in2
]
maximum flexural steel
ACI 318 § 10.3.3
( )
y
s
y
cw1
maxs,
f
E
f
0.003
fdbβ0.0019125
A
⋅⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
+
′⋅⋅⋅⋅
= = 2.58 in2
[flexure steel As = 1.58 in2
]
Horizontal Flexure Design of Interior Wall:
The wall is 14″ thick, place the horizontal bars inside of the vertical bars. Try #8 bars @ 8″
bw = 12″ d = 14″ - 2″ - vertical bar dia - bar dia/2 = 10.5″ Ag = 168 in2
f′c = 3,500 psi fy = 60,000 psi As = 1.185 in2
( )cw1
ys
f0.85bβ
fA
c
′⋅⋅⋅
⋅
= = 2.343 in
φMn =( ) ⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛ ⋅
−⋅⋅⋅
2
cβ
dfA0.9 1
ys = 608,174 lb-in/ft = 50,681 lb-ft/ft
Mu = 46,533 lb-ft/ft φMn = 50,681 lb-ft/ft
minimum flexural steel
ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 s
y
w
A
f
db200
≤
⋅⋅
⇒ As.min = 0.42 in2
[flexure steel As = 1.185 in2
]
ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 sw
y
c
Adb
f
f3
≤⋅⋅
′⋅
⇒ As.min = 0.248 in2
[flexure steel As = 1.185 in2
]
minimum vertical wall steel
ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.003×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.504 in2
[total steel As = 2.37 in2
]
minimum steel for temperature and shrinkage
ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.005×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.84 in2
[total steel As = 2.37 in2
]
maximum flexural steel
ACI 318 § 10.3.3
( )
y
s
y
cw1
maxs,
f
E
f
0.003
fdbβ0.0019125
A
⋅⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
+
′⋅⋅⋅⋅
= = 2.357 in2
[flexure steel As = 1.185 in2
]
Shear Capacity (1′ wide strip either way):
bw = 12″ d = 11.5″ f′c = 3,500 psi
lb/ft16,328dbf2V wcc =′=
design shear strength = φVn = 0.75Vc = 12,246 lb/ft
Vu = 12,053 lb/ft φVn = 12,246 lb/ft
Long Exterior Wall
The Long exterior wall has the same geometry as the interior wall. A simple demonstration
shows that the effect of the interior fluid is significantly greater than the exterior soil and
groundwater. The long exterior wall will take the same design as the interior walls.
10 ft
4 ft
3 ft
groundwater
grade
q2 q3
exteriorinterior
15 ft
q1
R1
R2 R3
interior
q1 = (1.3)(1.7)(15′)(63 pcf) = 2,089 psf R1 = 0.5(15′)q1 = 15,668 lb/ft d1 = 15′/3 = 5′
moment = R1×d1 = 78,340 lb-ft/ft
exterior
q2 = (1.3)(1.6)(7′)(45 pcf) = 656 psf R2 = 0.5(7′)q2 = 2,296 lb/ft d2 = 7′/3 = 2.334′
q3 = (1.3)(1.7)(3′)(50 pcf) = 332 psf R3 = 0.5(3′)q3 = 498 lb/ft d3 = 3′/3 = 1′
moment = R2×d2 + R3×d3 = 5,857 lb-ft/ft
Short Exterior Wall Design
As with the long exterior walls, the effect of the internal fluid pressure will be greater than that
of the exterior soil and groundwater pressure. As a result the wall will be designed for the
interior fluid pressure.
fixed
free
fixed
fixed
qb
a
a = 15′ b = 20′ b/a = 1.33 q = (15′)(63 pcf) = 945 psf
The coefficients for b/a = 1.5 are larger than those for b/a = 1.25. Conservatively the tables for
b/a = 1.5 will be used. From page 2-20 of PCA-R, the maximum vertical moment coefficient is
61. This moment occurs at the center-bottom of the wall. Similarly the maximum horizontal
moment coefficient is 44, located near the top ends of the wall.
For the moment calculations qu = (1.3)(1.7)(945 pcf) = 2,089 psf
Mu = moment coefficient × qu × a2
/1000
Vertical Moment: coef = 61 Mu = 28,672 lb-ft/ft
Horizontal Moment: coef = 44 Mu = 20,682 lb-ft/ft
The maximum shear in the wall is obtained from the maximum shear coefficient from page 2-17
of PCA-R, in this case Cs = 0.40. The wall will be designed for the concrete to resist the entire
shear force.
For the shear calculation qu = (1.0)(1.7)(945 pcf) = 1,607 psf
Vu = Cs × qu ×a = (0.40)(1,607 psf)(15′) = 9,642 lb/ft
Vertical Flexure Design for the Short Exterior Wall:
Keep the wall thickness at 14″ with 2″ clear concrete cover and #6 bars @ 8″
bw = 12″ d = 14″ - 2″ - bar dia/2 = 11.625″ Ag = 168 in2
f′c = 3,500 psi fy = 60,000 psi As = 0.66 in2
( )cw1
ys
f0.85bβ
fA
c
′⋅⋅⋅
⋅
= = 1.305 in
φMn =( ) ⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛ ⋅
−⋅⋅⋅
2
cβ
dfA0.9 1
ys = 394,548 lb-in/ft = 32,879 lb-ft/ft
Mu = 28,672 lb-ft/ft φMn = 32,879 lb-ft/ft
minimum flexural steel
ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 s
y
w
A
f
db200
≤
⋅⋅
⇒ As.min = 0.465 in2
[flexure steel As = 0.66 in2
]
ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 sw
y
c
Adb
f
f3
≤⋅⋅
′⋅
⇒ As.min = 0.413 in2
[flexure steel As = 0.66 in2
]
minimum vertical wall steel
ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.003×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.504 in2
[total steel As = 1.32 in2
]
minimum steel for temperature and shrinkage
ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.005×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.84 in2
[total steel As = 1.32 in2
]
maximum flexural steel
ACI 318 § 10.3.3
( )
y
s
y
cw1
maxs,
f
E
f
0.003
fdbβ0.0019125
A
⋅⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
+
′⋅⋅⋅⋅
= = 2.609 in2
[flexure steel As = 0.66 in2
]
Horizontal Flexure Design for the Short Exterior Wall:
The wall is 14″ thick, place the horizontal bars inside of the vertical bars. The interior walls and
long exterior walls have horizontal a spacing of 8″. In order to accommodate rebar splices keep
the spacing for the horizontal steel at 8″. Try #5 bars @ 8″
bw = 12″ d = 14″ - 2″ - vertical bar dia - bar dia/2 = 10.6875″ Ag = 168 in2
f′c = 3,500 psi fy = 60,000 psi As = 0.465 in2
( )cw1
ys
f0.85bβ
fA
c
′⋅⋅⋅
⋅
= = 0.919 in
φMn =( ) ⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛ ⋅
−⋅⋅⋅
2
cβ
dfA0.9 1
ys = 258,551 lb-in/ft = 21,546 lb-ft/ft
Mu = 20,682 lb-ft/ft φMn = 21,546 lb-ft/ft
minimum flexural steel
ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 s
y
w
A
f
db200
≤
⋅⋅
⇒ As.min = 0.428 in2
[flexure steel As = 0.465 in2
]
ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 sw
y
c
Adb
f
f3
≤⋅⋅
′⋅
⇒ As.min = 0.374 in2
[flexure steel As = 0.465 in2
]
minimum vertical wall steel
ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.003×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.504 in2
[total steel As = 0.93 in2
]
minimum steel for temperature and shrinkage
ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.005×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.84 in2
[total steel As = 0.93 in2
]
maximum flexural steel
ACI 318 § 10.3.3
( )
y
s
y
cw1
maxs,
f
E
f
0.003
fdbβ0.0019125
A
⋅⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
+
′⋅⋅⋅⋅
= = 2.357 in2
[flexure steel As = 0.465 in2
]
Shear Capacity (1′ wide strip either way):
bw = 12″ d = 11.625″ f′c = 3,500 psi
lb/ft16,505dbf2V wcc =′=
design shear strength = φVn = 0.75Vc = 12,378 lb/ft
Vu = 9,642 lb/ft φVn = 12,378 lb/ft
Slab Design
One of the criteria for slab design is that it must be able to resist the moment from the bottom of
the wall. As a first approximation, assume the slab to be 14″ thick.
Mu
Mu
Another scenario is uplift from groundwater:
The tank in an empty state along with a high groundwater table can experience severe uplift on
the floor slab. In this example the groundwater table is then 3′ + 1.17′ above the bottom of the
14″ thick slab. The approximate dimensions of the slab are 60′ × 20′. The slab will be designed
as a one-way flexure member spanning in the short direction. Consider a 1′ wide strip of slab
with an ultimate load wu from the water pressure below the slab.
20′
wu
20′20′
The water pressure pushing upward is reduced by the weight of the slab. The water pressure is
multiplied by a factor of 1.7, and the dead weight of the concrete is multiplied by a factor of 0.9.
The sanitation coefficient is 1.3 for flexure and 1/0 for shear, provided the concrete will resist all
of the shear force.
wu = 1.3[1.7(62 pcf)(4.17 ft)(1′) − 0.9(150 pcf)(14″/12)(1′)] = 367 lb/ft
Mu = (0.1167)(367 lb/ft)(20 ft)2
= 17,132 lb-ft/ft
from continuous beam tables
Vu = 1.0(1.7)(0.617)(367 lb/ft)(20′) = 7,699 lb
Note that this moment is significantly smaller than the moment at the bottom of the long walls.
The design of the slab in the short direction will be the same as that of the walls in the vertical
direction, #8 bars @ 6″ top and bottom faces of the slab. Also note that the shear is considerably
less than in the walls, thus the 14″ thick slab is adequate for the shear strength.
The slab in the long span direction is mainly taking moment from the bottom of the short exterior
walls. The same design will be used in this direction as the vertical reinforcing for the short
exterior walls, #6 bars @ 8″ top and bottom faces.
Flotation
ACI 350.R4-04 section 3.1.2 gives a criterion for flotation of the tank under high groundwater
water conditions:
Uplift
LoadDead
1.25 ≤
Total weight of tank:
20′20′
60′
20′14″ 14″ 14″14″
14″
14″
slab (64.66′)(62.33′)(1.166′) = 4,699 ft3
4 long walls (4)( 62.33′)(17′)(1.166′) = 4,942 ft3
total volume = 12,019 ft3
6 short walls (6)(20′)(17′)(1.166′) = 2,378 ft3
total weight of tank = (12,019 ft3
)(150 pcf) = 1,802,850 lb
uplift pressure = (62 pcf)(4.17 ft) = 258.5 psf
uplift area = (64.66′)(62.33′) = 4,031 ft3
uplift force = 1,042,014 lb
1.73
Uplift
LoadDead
=
Bearing on Soil
total weight of tank = 1,802,850 lb
weight of fluid = (3)(20′)(60′)(15′) (63 pcf) = 3,402,000 lb
total weight = 5,204,850 lb
footprint area = 4,031 ft3
soil pressure = 1,291 psf
soil capacity = 2,700 psf

More Related Content

PDF
Pca rectangular concrete tanks (1)
PDF
Anchor bolt design
PDF
17-Examples of Beams (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
PDF
Concrete beam design
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #13: Elastic Settlements]
PDF
Reinforce Concrete Design I - By Dr. Iftekhar Anam
PDF
Direct Shear Test
 
PDF
Design of 3 piles pile cap
Pca rectangular concrete tanks (1)
Anchor bolt design
17-Examples of Beams (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
Concrete beam design
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #13: Elastic Settlements]
Reinforce Concrete Design I - By Dr. Iftekhar Anam
Direct Shear Test
 
Design of 3 piles pile cap

What's hot (20)

PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #25: Coulomb EP Theory - Numericals]
PDF
Chapter 20
PDF
Lec.7 strength design method rectangular sections 3
PDF
Momento resistente ca1 2015
PPTX
Lineamientos para el diseño de juntas
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #21: Lateral Earth Pressure)
PDF
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation SPT
PPTX
Bearing capacity estimation rocks for foundation
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
PDF
Presion Lateral de Suelos ( ESFUERZOS HORIZONTALES)
PDF
Steel Design 6th Edition Segui Solutions Manual
PDF
MURO DE CONTENCION ARMADO.pdf
PDF
Empuje de suelos según Rankine, Coulomb y efecto sísmico de acuerdo a la teor...
PPT
Reinforced Concrete Design (2)
PDF
8110-1-1997.pdf
PDF
ASCE/SEI 7-10
PPTX
CE72.52 - Lecture 3b - Section Behavior - Shear and Torsion
PDF
Ejercicio Juarez Badillo.pdf
PDF
05 chapter 6 mat foundations
PDF
Trabajo puentes final
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #25: Coulomb EP Theory - Numericals]
Chapter 20
Lec.7 strength design method rectangular sections 3
Momento resistente ca1 2015
Lineamientos para el diseño de juntas
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #21: Lateral Earth Pressure)
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation SPT
Bearing capacity estimation rocks for foundation
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
Presion Lateral de Suelos ( ESFUERZOS HORIZONTALES)
Steel Design 6th Edition Segui Solutions Manual
MURO DE CONTENCION ARMADO.pdf
Empuje de suelos según Rankine, Coulomb y efecto sísmico de acuerdo a la teor...
Reinforced Concrete Design (2)
8110-1-1997.pdf
ASCE/SEI 7-10
CE72.52 - Lecture 3b - Section Behavior - Shear and Torsion
Ejercicio Juarez Badillo.pdf
05 chapter 6 mat foundations
Trabajo puentes final
Ad

Similar to Rectangular tank example_latest (20)

PDF
Design-of-Footings lecture presentation.pdf
PDF
Masonry Design Example for building with brick materials.
PDF
Basement wall design
PDF
6._Bearing_Capacity_from_other_methods.pdf
PPTX
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
PDF
6-Eccecntric Footing.pdf shajasjakssjssjwjs
PDF
Design and detailing_of_retaining_walls counter fort.تصميم الجدران الاستنادية...
PPTX
IDP PROJECT column.pptxvjfhhfudyytststrrsrsr
PDF
Retaining wall design_example
PDF
Precast driven pile 450 x450
PDF
Deber corte
PDF
Design of Variable Depth Single-Span Post.pdf
PPTX
Seismic design of liquid storage tanks.pptx
PDF
STRAP_FOOTING_Analysis_and_Design001.pdf
PDF
51495
PDF
pipe line calculation
PPT
3440551.ppt
PDF
Sd i-module3- rajesh sir
PDF
PPT
Slender columnn and two-way slabs
Design-of-Footings lecture presentation.pdf
Masonry Design Example for building with brick materials.
Basement wall design
6._Bearing_Capacity_from_other_methods.pdf
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
6-Eccecntric Footing.pdf shajasjakssjssjwjs
Design and detailing_of_retaining_walls counter fort.تصميم الجدران الاستنادية...
IDP PROJECT column.pptxvjfhhfudyytststrrsrsr
Retaining wall design_example
Precast driven pile 450 x450
Deber corte
Design of Variable Depth Single-Span Post.pdf
Seismic design of liquid storage tanks.pptx
STRAP_FOOTING_Analysis_and_Design001.pdf
51495
pipe line calculation
3440551.ppt
Sd i-module3- rajesh sir
Slender columnn and two-way slabs
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Elevate Cleaning Efficiency Using Tallfly Hair Remover Roller Factory Expertise
PDF
Katrina Stoneking: Shaking Up the Alcohol Beverage Industry
PPTX
Probability Distribution, binomial distribution, poisson distribution
PPTX
CkgxkgxydkydyldylydlydyldlyddolydyoyyU2.pptx
PDF
COST SHEET- Tender and Quotation unit 2.pdf
PDF
kom-180-proposal-for-a-directive-amending-directive-2014-45-eu-and-directive-...
PPT
Lecture 3344;;,,(,(((((((((((((((((((((((
PDF
NISM Series V-A MFD Workbook v December 2024.khhhjtgvwevoypdnew one must use ...
PPTX
Principles of Marketing, Industrial, Consumers,
PDF
Solara Labs: Empowering Health through Innovative Nutraceutical Solutions
PDF
SIMNET Inc – 2023’s Most Trusted IT Services & Solution Provider
PDF
Digital Marketing & E-commerce Certificate Glossary.pdf.................
PPTX
3. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE UNIIT 3^..pptx
PPT
340036916-American-Literature-Literary-Period-Overview.ppt
PPTX
HR Introduction Slide (1).pptx on hr intro
PDF
Unit 1 Cost Accounting - Cost sheet
PDF
Daniels 2024 Inclusive, Sustainable Development
PDF
pdfcoffee.com-opt-b1plus-sb-answers.pdfvi
DOCX
unit 1 COST ACCOUNTING AND COST SHEET
PDF
Ôn tập tiếng anh trong kinh doanh nâng cao
Elevate Cleaning Efficiency Using Tallfly Hair Remover Roller Factory Expertise
Katrina Stoneking: Shaking Up the Alcohol Beverage Industry
Probability Distribution, binomial distribution, poisson distribution
CkgxkgxydkydyldylydlydyldlyddolydyoyyU2.pptx
COST SHEET- Tender and Quotation unit 2.pdf
kom-180-proposal-for-a-directive-amending-directive-2014-45-eu-and-directive-...
Lecture 3344;;,,(,(((((((((((((((((((((((
NISM Series V-A MFD Workbook v December 2024.khhhjtgvwevoypdnew one must use ...
Principles of Marketing, Industrial, Consumers,
Solara Labs: Empowering Health through Innovative Nutraceutical Solutions
SIMNET Inc – 2023’s Most Trusted IT Services & Solution Provider
Digital Marketing & E-commerce Certificate Glossary.pdf.................
3. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE UNIIT 3^..pptx
340036916-American-Literature-Literary-Period-Overview.ppt
HR Introduction Slide (1).pptx on hr intro
Unit 1 Cost Accounting - Cost sheet
Daniels 2024 Inclusive, Sustainable Development
pdfcoffee.com-opt-b1plus-sb-answers.pdfvi
unit 1 COST ACCOUNTING AND COST SHEET
Ôn tập tiếng anh trong kinh doanh nâng cao

Rectangular tank example_latest

  • 1. A Design Example for a Rectangular Concrete Tank PCA Design Method CVEN 4830/4434 University of Colorado, Boulder Spring Semester 2008 Prepared by Ben Blackard
  • 2. The Portland Cement Association (PCA) has publications for designing rectangular and circular tanks. Some of the design provisions differ from that of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) specifications. Many in the industry use these PCA design concepts, so we will adapt them for our calculations as well. Much of the PCA publication is comprised of tables of coefficients for calculating moment and shear in two-way slabs. These tables should simplify the calculations. We will refer to the PCA Rectangular Concrete Tanks design manual as PCA-R, and the circular tank design manual as PCA-C. An additional safety factor is used for the loads called the “Sanitation Coefficient”, we will denote it with SC for brevity. Note that this notation is not an industry standard. The purpose of the sanitation coefficient is to indirectly reduce the stress, and thus the strain, in the steel reinforcing. The result is lower strain in the concrete, and thus less cracking. The ultimate load will be multiplied by SC, which has different values for different calculations: 1.3 for flexure SC= 1.65 for direct tension (hoop tensile stress in reinforcing) 1.0 shear provided by concrete 1.3 for shear beyond that provided by concrete Another change is the fluid load factor is 1.7 rather than 1.4 as stated in the ACI specification. For the purposes of this class, the following load combinations and factors will be used: Mu = 1.3(1.4D + 1.7F + 1.6H) for flexure Pu = 1.65(1.4D + 1.7F + 1.6H) for direct tension (hoop tensile stress in reinforcing) Pu = 1.0(1.4D + 1.7F + 1.6H) for direct compression (hoop compression stress in concrete) Vu = 1.0(1.4D + 1.7F + 1.6H) shear provided by concrete Vu = 1.3(1.4D + 1.7F + 1.6H) for shear beyond that provided by concrete D = dead load F = fluid pressure H = earth pressure
  • 3. Rectangular Concrete Tank Design Example An open top concrete tank is to have three chambers, each measuring 20′×60′ as shown. The wall height is 17′. The tank will be partially underground, the grade level is 10′ below the top of the tank. The highest groundwater table is expected to be 4′ below grade. The fluid level inside the tank is 15′. 20′20′ 60′ 20′ f′c = 3,500 psi fy = 60,000 psi soil bearing capacity = 2,700 psf Walls above the groundwater table should be designed using a lateral earth pressure equivalent to that developed by a fluid weighing 45 pcf, below the groundwater table use 95 pcf. Due to the settlement characteristics of the soil, it is recommended that the bearing pressure be kept as constant as possible for the full tank loading scenario. Assume the density of the fluid in the tank is 63 pcf.
  • 4. Interior Wall Design Boundary condition case 3 in chapter 2 of PCA-R will be used for determining the applied moments to the tank walls (pages 2-17 thru 2-22). Consider the 15′ water depth to be the height of the wall. fixed free fixed fixed qb a a = 15′ b = 60′ b/a = 4.0 q = (15′)(63 pcf) = 945 psf From page 2-18 of PCA-R, the maximum vertical moment coefficient is 149, looking at the Mx table. This moment occurs at the center-bottom of the wall. Similarly, the My table gives a maximum horizontal moment coefficient of 99, located at the top ends of the wall. For the moment calculations qu = (1.3)(1.7)(945 pcf) = 2,089 psf Mu = moment coefficient × qu × a2 /1000 Vertical Moment: coef = 149 Mu = 70,034 lb-ft/ft Horizontal Moment: coef = 99 Mu = 46,533 lb-ft/ft The maximum shear in the wall is obtained from the maximum shear coefficient from page 2-17 of PCA-R, in this case Cs = 0.50. The wall will be designed for the concrete to resist the entire shear force. For the shear calculation qu = (1.0)(1.7)(945 pcf) = 1,607 psf Vu = Cs × qu ×a = (0.50)(1,607 psf)(15′) = 12,053 lb/ft Note: The moment in the wall varies considerably for different locations in the wall. The reinforcing could differ at several locations for a highly efficient design. The thickness of the wall could also vary, either tapering the wall or stepping the wall. However, for the sake of time, the reinforcing will be kept consistent for the entire wall. One design for the vertical moments, and the other for the horizontal moments. This is a common practice in engineering. Time is not only saved for the design engineer, but also the detailers and construction crew saves time as compared to a more complicated design. This design philosophy is entitled to change if substantial material savings could be realized and if time permits.
  • 5. Vertical Flexure Design of Interior Wall: try a 14″ thick wall with 2″ clear concrete cover and #8 bars @ 6″ (design a 1′ wide vertical strip of wall) bw = 12″ d = 14″ - 2″ - bar dia/2 = 11.5″ Ag = 168 in2 f′c = 3,500 psi fy = 60,000 psi As = 1.58 in2 ( )cw1 ys f0.85bβ fA c ′⋅⋅⋅ ⋅ = = 3.124 in φMn =( ) ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ ⋅ −⋅⋅⋅ 2 cβ dfA0.9 1 ys = 867,898 lb-in/ft = 72,325 lb-ft/ft Mu = 70,034 lb-ft/ft φMn = 72,325 lb-ft/ft minimum flexural steel ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 s y w A f db200 ≤ ⋅⋅ ⇒ As.min = 0.46 in2 [flexure steel As = 1.58 in2 ] ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 sw y c Adb f f3 ≤⋅⋅ ′⋅ ⇒ As.min = 0.408 in2 [flexure steel As = 1.58 in2 ] minimum vertical wall steel ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.003×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.504 in2 [total steel As = 3.16 in2 ] minimum steel for temperature and shrinkage ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.005×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.84 in2 [total steel As = 3.16 in2 ] maximum flexural steel ACI 318 § 10.3.3 ( ) y s y cw1 maxs, f E f 0.003 fdbβ0.0019125 A ⋅⎟⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + ′⋅⋅⋅⋅ = = 2.58 in2 [flexure steel As = 1.58 in2 ]
  • 6. Horizontal Flexure Design of Interior Wall: The wall is 14″ thick, place the horizontal bars inside of the vertical bars. Try #8 bars @ 8″ bw = 12″ d = 14″ - 2″ - vertical bar dia - bar dia/2 = 10.5″ Ag = 168 in2 f′c = 3,500 psi fy = 60,000 psi As = 1.185 in2 ( )cw1 ys f0.85bβ fA c ′⋅⋅⋅ ⋅ = = 2.343 in φMn =( ) ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ ⋅ −⋅⋅⋅ 2 cβ dfA0.9 1 ys = 608,174 lb-in/ft = 50,681 lb-ft/ft Mu = 46,533 lb-ft/ft φMn = 50,681 lb-ft/ft minimum flexural steel ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 s y w A f db200 ≤ ⋅⋅ ⇒ As.min = 0.42 in2 [flexure steel As = 1.185 in2 ] ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 sw y c Adb f f3 ≤⋅⋅ ′⋅ ⇒ As.min = 0.248 in2 [flexure steel As = 1.185 in2 ] minimum vertical wall steel ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.003×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.504 in2 [total steel As = 2.37 in2 ] minimum steel for temperature and shrinkage ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.005×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.84 in2 [total steel As = 2.37 in2 ] maximum flexural steel ACI 318 § 10.3.3 ( ) y s y cw1 maxs, f E f 0.003 fdbβ0.0019125 A ⋅⎟⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + ′⋅⋅⋅⋅ = = 2.357 in2 [flexure steel As = 1.185 in2 ]
  • 7. Shear Capacity (1′ wide strip either way): bw = 12″ d = 11.5″ f′c = 3,500 psi lb/ft16,328dbf2V wcc =′= design shear strength = φVn = 0.75Vc = 12,246 lb/ft Vu = 12,053 lb/ft φVn = 12,246 lb/ft
  • 8. Long Exterior Wall The Long exterior wall has the same geometry as the interior wall. A simple demonstration shows that the effect of the interior fluid is significantly greater than the exterior soil and groundwater. The long exterior wall will take the same design as the interior walls. 10 ft 4 ft 3 ft groundwater grade q2 q3 exteriorinterior 15 ft q1 R1 R2 R3 interior q1 = (1.3)(1.7)(15′)(63 pcf) = 2,089 psf R1 = 0.5(15′)q1 = 15,668 lb/ft d1 = 15′/3 = 5′ moment = R1×d1 = 78,340 lb-ft/ft exterior q2 = (1.3)(1.6)(7′)(45 pcf) = 656 psf R2 = 0.5(7′)q2 = 2,296 lb/ft d2 = 7′/3 = 2.334′ q3 = (1.3)(1.7)(3′)(50 pcf) = 332 psf R3 = 0.5(3′)q3 = 498 lb/ft d3 = 3′/3 = 1′ moment = R2×d2 + R3×d3 = 5,857 lb-ft/ft
  • 9. Short Exterior Wall Design As with the long exterior walls, the effect of the internal fluid pressure will be greater than that of the exterior soil and groundwater pressure. As a result the wall will be designed for the interior fluid pressure. fixed free fixed fixed qb a a = 15′ b = 20′ b/a = 1.33 q = (15′)(63 pcf) = 945 psf The coefficients for b/a = 1.5 are larger than those for b/a = 1.25. Conservatively the tables for b/a = 1.5 will be used. From page 2-20 of PCA-R, the maximum vertical moment coefficient is 61. This moment occurs at the center-bottom of the wall. Similarly the maximum horizontal moment coefficient is 44, located near the top ends of the wall. For the moment calculations qu = (1.3)(1.7)(945 pcf) = 2,089 psf Mu = moment coefficient × qu × a2 /1000 Vertical Moment: coef = 61 Mu = 28,672 lb-ft/ft Horizontal Moment: coef = 44 Mu = 20,682 lb-ft/ft The maximum shear in the wall is obtained from the maximum shear coefficient from page 2-17 of PCA-R, in this case Cs = 0.40. The wall will be designed for the concrete to resist the entire shear force. For the shear calculation qu = (1.0)(1.7)(945 pcf) = 1,607 psf Vu = Cs × qu ×a = (0.40)(1,607 psf)(15′) = 9,642 lb/ft
  • 10. Vertical Flexure Design for the Short Exterior Wall: Keep the wall thickness at 14″ with 2″ clear concrete cover and #6 bars @ 8″ bw = 12″ d = 14″ - 2″ - bar dia/2 = 11.625″ Ag = 168 in2 f′c = 3,500 psi fy = 60,000 psi As = 0.66 in2 ( )cw1 ys f0.85bβ fA c ′⋅⋅⋅ ⋅ = = 1.305 in φMn =( ) ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ ⋅ −⋅⋅⋅ 2 cβ dfA0.9 1 ys = 394,548 lb-in/ft = 32,879 lb-ft/ft Mu = 28,672 lb-ft/ft φMn = 32,879 lb-ft/ft minimum flexural steel ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 s y w A f db200 ≤ ⋅⋅ ⇒ As.min = 0.465 in2 [flexure steel As = 0.66 in2 ] ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 sw y c Adb f f3 ≤⋅⋅ ′⋅ ⇒ As.min = 0.413 in2 [flexure steel As = 0.66 in2 ] minimum vertical wall steel ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.003×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.504 in2 [total steel As = 1.32 in2 ] minimum steel for temperature and shrinkage ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.005×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.84 in2 [total steel As = 1.32 in2 ] maximum flexural steel ACI 318 § 10.3.3 ( ) y s y cw1 maxs, f E f 0.003 fdbβ0.0019125 A ⋅⎟⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + ′⋅⋅⋅⋅ = = 2.609 in2 [flexure steel As = 0.66 in2 ]
  • 11. Horizontal Flexure Design for the Short Exterior Wall: The wall is 14″ thick, place the horizontal bars inside of the vertical bars. The interior walls and long exterior walls have horizontal a spacing of 8″. In order to accommodate rebar splices keep the spacing for the horizontal steel at 8″. Try #5 bars @ 8″ bw = 12″ d = 14″ - 2″ - vertical bar dia - bar dia/2 = 10.6875″ Ag = 168 in2 f′c = 3,500 psi fy = 60,000 psi As = 0.465 in2 ( )cw1 ys f0.85bβ fA c ′⋅⋅⋅ ⋅ = = 0.919 in φMn =( ) ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ ⋅ −⋅⋅⋅ 2 cβ dfA0.9 1 ys = 258,551 lb-in/ft = 21,546 lb-ft/ft Mu = 20,682 lb-ft/ft φMn = 21,546 lb-ft/ft minimum flexural steel ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 s y w A f db200 ≤ ⋅⋅ ⇒ As.min = 0.428 in2 [flexure steel As = 0.465 in2 ] ACI 350-06 § 10.5.1 sw y c Adb f f3 ≤⋅⋅ ′⋅ ⇒ As.min = 0.374 in2 [flexure steel As = 0.465 in2 ] minimum vertical wall steel ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.003×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.504 in2 [total steel As = 0.93 in2 ] minimum steel for temperature and shrinkage ACI 350-06 § 14.3.2 0.005×Ag ≤ As ⇒ As.min = 0.84 in2 [total steel As = 0.93 in2 ] maximum flexural steel ACI 318 § 10.3.3 ( ) y s y cw1 maxs, f E f 0.003 fdbβ0.0019125 A ⋅⎟⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜ ⎝ ⎛ + ′⋅⋅⋅⋅ = = 2.357 in2 [flexure steel As = 0.465 in2 ]
  • 12. Shear Capacity (1′ wide strip either way): bw = 12″ d = 11.625″ f′c = 3,500 psi lb/ft16,505dbf2V wcc =′= design shear strength = φVn = 0.75Vc = 12,378 lb/ft Vu = 9,642 lb/ft φVn = 12,378 lb/ft
  • 13. Slab Design One of the criteria for slab design is that it must be able to resist the moment from the bottom of the wall. As a first approximation, assume the slab to be 14″ thick. Mu Mu Another scenario is uplift from groundwater: The tank in an empty state along with a high groundwater table can experience severe uplift on the floor slab. In this example the groundwater table is then 3′ + 1.17′ above the bottom of the 14″ thick slab. The approximate dimensions of the slab are 60′ × 20′. The slab will be designed as a one-way flexure member spanning in the short direction. Consider a 1′ wide strip of slab with an ultimate load wu from the water pressure below the slab. 20′ wu 20′20′ The water pressure pushing upward is reduced by the weight of the slab. The water pressure is multiplied by a factor of 1.7, and the dead weight of the concrete is multiplied by a factor of 0.9. The sanitation coefficient is 1.3 for flexure and 1/0 for shear, provided the concrete will resist all of the shear force. wu = 1.3[1.7(62 pcf)(4.17 ft)(1′) − 0.9(150 pcf)(14″/12)(1′)] = 367 lb/ft Mu = (0.1167)(367 lb/ft)(20 ft)2 = 17,132 lb-ft/ft from continuous beam tables Vu = 1.0(1.7)(0.617)(367 lb/ft)(20′) = 7,699 lb Note that this moment is significantly smaller than the moment at the bottom of the long walls. The design of the slab in the short direction will be the same as that of the walls in the vertical direction, #8 bars @ 6″ top and bottom faces of the slab. Also note that the shear is considerably less than in the walls, thus the 14″ thick slab is adequate for the shear strength. The slab in the long span direction is mainly taking moment from the bottom of the short exterior walls. The same design will be used in this direction as the vertical reinforcing for the short exterior walls, #6 bars @ 8″ top and bottom faces.
  • 14. Flotation ACI 350.R4-04 section 3.1.2 gives a criterion for flotation of the tank under high groundwater water conditions: Uplift LoadDead 1.25 ≤ Total weight of tank: 20′20′ 60′ 20′14″ 14″ 14″14″ 14″ 14″ slab (64.66′)(62.33′)(1.166′) = 4,699 ft3 4 long walls (4)( 62.33′)(17′)(1.166′) = 4,942 ft3 total volume = 12,019 ft3 6 short walls (6)(20′)(17′)(1.166′) = 2,378 ft3 total weight of tank = (12,019 ft3 )(150 pcf) = 1,802,850 lb uplift pressure = (62 pcf)(4.17 ft) = 258.5 psf uplift area = (64.66′)(62.33′) = 4,031 ft3 uplift force = 1,042,014 lb 1.73 Uplift LoadDead =
  • 15. Bearing on Soil total weight of tank = 1,802,850 lb weight of fluid = (3)(20′)(60′)(15′) (63 pcf) = 3,402,000 lb total weight = 5,204,850 lb footprint area = 4,031 ft3 soil pressure = 1,291 psf soil capacity = 2,700 psf