remote working final project (2).pdf project f

1
1.1 INTRODUCTION:
Employee engagement refers to the emotional commitment and involvement employees have
towards their work, organization, and goals, influencing their motivation, productivity, and
loyalty. Employee engagement is the strength of the mental and emotional connection
employees feel toward the work they do, their teams, and their organization. Employee
engagement goes beyond activities, games, and events. Employee engagement drives
performance. Engaged employees look at the whole of the company and understand their
purpose, where, and how they fit in. This leads to better decision-making. Organizations with
an engaged workforce outperform their competition. They have higher earnings per share
(EPS) and recover more quickly after recessions and financial setbacks. Engagement is a key
differentiator when it comes to growth and innovation.
Remote working, also known as telecommuting or working from home, has become an
increasingly prevalent mode of employment in recent years, revolutionizing the traditional
workplace dynamic. This shift has been driven by technological advancements, changing
attitudes towards work-life balance, and global events like the COVID-19 pandemic that
necessitated a rapid adaptation to remote work for many organizations.
At its core, remote working allows employees to perform their job duties from a location
other than a central office. This could be from home, a co-working space, or even while
traveling. The primary enabler of remote work has been digital technology, with high-speed
internet, cloud computing, and collaboration tools making it possible to connect with
colleagues, access company resources, and complete tasks from virtually anywhere in the
world. These technologies have not only facilitated communication but also enabled real-time
collaboration, file sharing, and project management, ensuring that teams can work efficiently
and effectively regardless of their physical location.
The benefits of remote working are manifold. For employees, it offers greater flexibility and
autonomy over their work schedules, allowing them to better balance their professional and
personal lives. This can lead to increased job satisfaction, higher levels of productivity, and
reduced stress. For employers, remote working can result in cost savings from reduced office
space and overheads, access to a wider talent pool as geographical constraints are lifted, and
potentially higher employee retention rates. Additionally, remote work can contribute to
environmental sustainability by reducing commuting and the associated carbon emissions.

2
However, remote working is not without its challenges. One of the main concerns for
employers is maintaining team cohesion and fostering a strong company culture when
employees are dispersed. Communication can also be a hurdle, as asynchronous
communication across different time zones or reliance on digital platforms can sometimes
lead to misunderstandings or feelings of isolation. Furthermore, managing remote teams
requires a different approach to leadership and supervision, emphasizing trust, transparency,
and clear expectations.
In conclusion, remote working has transformed the way we approach work, offering both
opportunities and challenges for individuals and organizations alike. As technology continues
to evolve and our understanding of work-life balance evolves with it, remote working is
likely to become an even more integral part of the modern work landscape. By embracing the
benefits of remote work while addressing its challenges, companies can create a flexible and
resilient workforce that is well-equipped to succeed in an increasingly interconnected and
digital world.
1.2 DEFINITIONS:
 Towers Watson (a global consulting firm) defines employee engagement as "the extent to
which employees are motivated to contribute to organizational success and are willing to
apply discretionary effort to accomplishing tasks important to the achievement of
organizational goals."
 According to Dr. Prithwiraj Choudhury (Harvard Business School professor), "Remote
work is a working style that allows professionals to work outside of a traditional office
environment. It's based on the concept that work does not need to be done in a specific
place to be executed successfully."
1.3 HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF REMOTE WORKING:
The concept of remote working is not new; it has evolved over time in response to
technological advancements, economic shifts, and changing societal attitudes towards work.
While the term "remote work" might conjure images of modern home offices and digital
nomads, its roots can be traced back much further.

3
 Early Beginnings (Pre-20th Century):
Before the Industrial Revolution, most work was decentralized, with people often working
from their homes or small workshops. Craftsmen, artisans, and farmers typically worked
where they lived, integrating their work and personal lives in a way that modern remote
workers might find familiar. As industrialization took hold in the 18th and 19th centuries,
centralized workplaces like factories became the norm, and the concept of remote work
faded into the background.
 The Rise of Telecommuting (20th Century)
The 20th century saw the beginnings of what we now recognize as remote work. The
invention of the telephone in the late 19th century laid the groundwork for telecommuting,
allowing workers to communicate with colleagues and clients without being physically
present. However, it was not until the latter half of the 20th century that remote work
started to gain traction.
During the 1970s and 1980s, rising oil prices and concerns about environmental
sustainability led some companies to experiment with telecommuting as a way to reduce
commuting and office costs. The development of computer technology and the internet
further facilitated remote work, making it easier for employees to work from home and
collaborate with colleagues from a distance.
 The Digital Age and Globalization (Late 20th Century to Present):
The advent of the internet in the 1990s marked a significant turning point for remote work.
High-speed internet connections, email, and collaboration tools like video conferencing
made it possible for employees to work from virtually anywhere in the world. This period
also saw the rise of freelancing and gig economy platforms, providing individuals with
more flexibility and autonomy over their work.
The 21st century has seen remote work continue to evolve and become increasingly
mainstream. The COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, accelerated the adoption of remote
work as companies were forced to adapt to lockdowns and social distancing measures.
Many organizations that had previously been hesitant to embrace remote work quickly
transitioned to remote-friendly or fully remote operations.
 Future Outlook:
As we look to the future, it's clear that remote work is here to stay. Advances in
technology, such as virtual reality and augmented reality, promise to make remote
collaboration even more immersive and seamless. Additionally, ongoing societal shifts

4
towards a greater emphasis on work-life balance and flexibility are likely to drive further
adoption of remote working arrangements.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the historical evolution of remote working reflects broader changes in
technology, economics, and societal values. From its decentralized beginnings to its current
prominence in the digital age, remote work has continually adapted and evolved to meet the
needs of workers and organizations alike.
1.4 KEY ASPECTS OF REMOTE WORKING:
Remote working, a flexible work arrangement that allows employees to perform their job
duties from locations other than a traditional office, has gained significant prominence in
recent years. This shift towards remote work has been driven by technological advancements,
changing work cultures, and the need for greater flexibility in today's fast-paced world. Here
are key aspects that define remote working:
1. Flexibility and Autonomy:
One of the most appealing aspects of remote working is the flexibility it offers to
employees. Remote workers often have the freedom to set their own schedules, allowing
them to work during their most productive hours and accommodate personal
commitments. This flexibility can lead to increased job satisfaction and a better work-life
balance, as employees can better manage their time and prioritize their responsibilities.
2. Location Independence:
Remote working breaks down geographical barriers, allowing employees to work from
virtually anywhere with an internet connection. This can be particularly beneficial for
individuals who live in remote areas, have mobility issues, or prefer to work from the
comfort of their homes. For employers, location independence means access to a broader
talent pool, as they are not restricted to hiring candidates who can commute to a physical
office.
3. Technology-Driven Collaboration:
Advancements in technology have been instrumental in enabling remote working.
Collaboration tools like video conferencing, instant messaging, and cloud-based platforms

5
allow remote teams to communicate effectively, share documents in real-time, and
collaborate on projects as if they were in the same room. These tools have made it possible
for remote workers to stay connected and productive, regardless of their physical location.
4. Work-Life Balance:
Remote working can contribute to a healthier work-life balance by reducing or eliminating
commuting time and allowing employees to spend more time with their families or pursue
hobbies and interests. This can lead to reduced stress levels, improved mental health, and a
greater sense of overall well-being. However, it's essential for remote workers to establish
clear boundaries between work and personal life to avoid burnout and maintain
productivity.
5. Cost Savings:
For employers, remote working can result in significant cost savings. Reduced office
space requirements mean lower overhead costs, and employers may also save on utilities,
office supplies, and other expenses associated with maintaining a physical workspace.
Additionally, remote work can lead to increased employee retention and reduced turnover,
which can result in cost savings related to hiring and training new staff.
6. Challenges and Considerations:
While remote working offers numerous benefits, it also comes with its own set of
challenges. Communication can sometimes be more challenging in a remote setting,
leading to misunderstandings or feelings of isolation among team members. Managers
may need to adapt their leadership styles to effectively manage remote teams, emphasizing
trust, transparency, and clear expectations.
Security is another consideration in remote working arrangements. Employers must ensure
that remote workers have secure access to company systems and data to protect against
cyber threats. This may require implementing robust cyber security measures and
providing employees with training on best practices for remote work security.
Conclusion
Remote working is a flexible and adaptable work arrangement that offers numerous benefits
to both employees and employers. From increased flexibility and autonomy to cost savings
and access to a broader talent pool, remote work has the potential to transform the way we
approach work in the modern world.

6
1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF REMOTE WORKING:
Remote working holds significant importance for individuals, businesses, and society as a
whole. Here are some key aspects highlighting its significance:
1. Flexibility and Work-Life Balance: Remote working allows employees to have more
control over their schedules, leading to better work-life balance. This flexibility enables
individuals to manage personal commitments, such as childcare or pursuing further
education, while still meeting work responsibilities.
2. Access to a Global Talent Pool: Remote work eliminates geographical barriers, allowing
businesses to tap into a global talent pool. Companies can hire the best talent regardless of
location, leading to increased diversity and innovation within teams.
3. Cost Savings: Both employees and employers can benefit from cost savings associated
with remote work. Employees save money on commuting expenses, work attire, and
dining out, while employers can reduce overhead costs related to office space, utilities,
and equipment.
4. Increased Productivity: Numerous studies have shown that remote workers often report
higher levels of productivity compared to their office-based counterparts. Reduced
distractions, fewer interruptions, and the ability to create a personalized work environment
contribute to improved focus and efficiency.
5. Business Continuity and Resilience: Remote working provides a level of resilience
against disruptions such as natural disasters, public health emergencies, or transportation
strikes. Companies with remote work capabilities can maintain business operations during
crises without significant interruptions.
6. Environmental Sustainability: Remote work has a positive impact on the environment
by reducing carbon emissions associated with commuting and office buildings. With fewer
employees commuting to work, there is a decrease in traffic congestion and pollution,
contributing to environmental sustainability efforts.
7. Inclusivity and Accessibility: Remote work promotes inclusivity by providing
opportunities for individuals with disabilities, caregivers, and those living in rural or
underserved areas to participate in the workforce. It allows people to work in
environments that accommodate their unique needs and circumstances.
8. Employee Well-being: Remote work can improve employee well-being by reducing
stress associated with commuting, providing a more comfortable work environment, and

7
offering greater flexibility to manage personal and professional responsibilities. This, in
turn, can lead to higher job satisfaction and employee retention.
9. Digital Transformation: Remote work drives digital transformation by encouraging the
adoption of digital tools and technologies that enable collaboration, communication, and
productivity in virtual environments. Organizations invest in cloud-based solutions,
project management software, and cybersecurity measures to support remote work
operations.
10. Cultural Shift in Work Practices: Remote working represents a cultural shift in
traditional work practices, emphasizing outcomes and results over time spent in the office.
It encourages a results-oriented approach to work, where employees are evaluated based
on their contributions rather than their physical presence.
Overall, remote working has become a fundamental aspect of modern work culture, offering
benefits to individuals, businesses, and society while shaping the future of work.
1.6 REMOTE WORKING POLICY:
A remote working policy is a set of guidelines and procedures established by an organization
to govern remote work arrangements for its employees. This policy outlines the terms and
conditions under which employees may work remotely, as well as the expectations and
responsibilities associated with remote work. It typically covers various aspects, including
eligibility criteria, communication protocols, equipment provision, data security measures,

8
performance management, health and safety guidelines, legal considerations, and procedures
for requesting and approving remote work.
The essentials of a remote work policy:
Here's an outline for creating a remote working policy:
1. Introduction and Purpose: Define the purpose of the policy, emphasizing the
organization's commitment to supporting remote work arrangements while maintaining
productivity and ensuring employee well-being.
2. Scope: Clearly define which employees are eligible for remote work and under what
conditions, considering job roles, performance expectations, and business needs.
3. Remote Work Eligibility Criteria: Specify the criteria employees must meet to be
eligible for remote work, such as tenure, job performance, and role suitability.
4. Remote Work Arrangements: Outline the types of remote work arrangements available,
including full-time remote work, part-time remote work, and flexible scheduling options.
5. Work Hours and Availability: Define expected work hours and availability for remote
employees, clarifying communication expectations and flexibility for time zone
differences.
6. Communication Guidelines: Establish protocols for remote communication, including
preferred communication channels, response times, and meeting schedules.
7. Data Security and Confidentiality: Address data security measures and protocols for
handling sensitive information, including the use of secure networks, encryption, and data
access policies.
8. Equipment and Technology: Specify the equipment and technology requirements for
remote work, including hardware, software, and internet connectivity standards. Outline
the process for providing and maintaining equipment.
9. Performance Management: Establish performance evaluation criteria for remote
employees, including metrics for productivity, collaboration, and communication. Define
how performance will be monitored and assessed.
10. Health and Safety: Address ergonomic considerations and guidelines for setting up a
safe and comfortable home office environment. Provide resources for promoting physical
and mental well-being.
11. Training and Support: Outline training opportunities and resources available to remote
employees for skill development, technology usage, and adapting to remote work.

9
12. Remote Work Agreement: Require remote employees to sign a remote work agreement
acknowledging their understanding of and agreement to comply with the remote working
policy.
13. Policy Review and Updates: Specify the process for reviewing and updating the remote
working policy to adapt to changing circumstances, feedback from employees, and
evolving best practices.
14. Compliance and Legal Considerations: Ensure compliance with relevant labor laws,
regulations, and industry standards, considering factors such as overtime pay, tax
implications, and remote work regulations in different jurisdictions.
15. Approval Process: Outline the process for requesting and approving remote work
arrangements, including manager approval and any required documentation.
16. Termination of Remote Work Arrangements: Define the circumstances under which
remote work arrangements may be terminated, including performance issues, changes in
business needs, or policy violations.
1.7 HYBRID WORK SCHEDULE:
Hybrid work incorporates a mixture of in-office and remote work in an employee’s schedule.
Employees occasionally have the ability to pick and choose when they work from home and
when they come into the office.
People refer to the hybrid model a lot, but there isn’t exactly one clearly defined example.
Ultimately, it involves some combination of working remotely and from an office. So far, the
hybrid model looks different for every organization, but there are a few clear themes.
Whatever the specifics, however, companies that choose to incorporate a hybrid model will
all face some challenges.
TYPES OF HYBRID WORK SCHEDULE:
 Remote-First Hybrid Work Schedule:
Many leaders are choosing to go remote-first, meaning that their operations will closely
mirror those of a fully remote company, with a few exceptions. Notably, most will keep
their offices as space for employees to work from. Some also won’t allow the same
flexibility to every employee, meaning that they may require some employees to continue
coming to the office if their job requires their physical presence.

10
Remote-first will look slightly different for everyone, but the main principle is that the
company should act like a fully remote company with employees spread out across time
zones and defaulting to online communication.
We can already see examples of businesses shifting to this structure. For instance, Quora
announced that they were moving to the remote first model. Their CEO, Adam D’Angelo,
explained their model thusly: “Remote work will be the primary orientation of our
company the default for all choices.”
 Office-Occasional Hybrid Work Schedule:
Some companies are eager to get back to the office. Maybe they don’t want to lose money
on unused office space, or they still aren’t sold on remote work. These businesses may set
up a hybrid model that can be described as office-occasional.
The idea here is that employees come into the office a few times a week. Unlike
Dropbox’s remote-first setup, in which office spaces are purely to be used for
collaboration, this model uses the office to blend in-person collaboration and solo work.
Depending on the company’s needs, this can be quite a loose policy (e.g., employees are
instructed to come into the office two days a week of their choice), or there could be more
firm guidelines (e.g., employees are expected to work from the office every Monday).
The core of this model is that the company isn’t going fully remote-first like the first
example. Instead, they choose to keep an office and require employees to spend some time
in it. Some employees may even want to spend more than the required amount of time
there. Regardless, the workforce will be mostly local rather than distributed because
employees have to come into the office occasionally.
Although this model ideally sits in the middle of remote-first and office-first, it can easily
get pulled in either direction without clear guidelines. For that reason, it’s important to
establish best practices for communication early on. Leadership should also pay close
attention to the varying experiences of teammates depending on how often and how
regularly they work from the office.
 Office-First, Remote Allowed Hybrid Work Schedule:
Another option is to keep both the office and remote work but designate the office as the
primary place for working. This was a common setup prior to Covid-19; companies would
have a small percentage of their workforce be remote and the rest worked from one main
office space. This approach is particularly common if the entire leadership team is in the
office. The rest of the company is likely to become office-centered by default as the

11
leadership team will generally have in-person conversation and collaboration, excluding
remote workers.
In this model, the company offers a remote work policy and might have some employees
scattered, but those who work in-office and those who don’t are differentiated by the
connections and opportunities in-office folks get by working so closely with the leadership
team.
Examples of Hybrid Work Schedules
 Split Schedule: Employees split up their work week so they spend days in the office and
at home.
 Team-Driven Schedule: Each team in a company determines where they would like to
work throughout the week.
 Company-Driven Schedule: Company leadership determines which days employees will
be set to work in-office and at home.

12
 Staggered Schedule: In addition to determining what days to come into office, staggered
hybrid schedules also determine what times employees should arrive and depart from
work?
 Full-Flexibility Schedule: Allow each employee to choose where they would like to
work.
Benefits of a Remote-First Hybrid Work Schedule:
 Reduces Workspace Inequalities:
The remote-first hybrid work schedule avoids many of the pitfalls of having employees
split between office and remote and puts the whole company on a level playing ground
rather than rewarding those who work from the office.
 Allows Flexibility
A strong remote-first culture will not just mitigate the inequalities that naturally arise with
hybrid workspaces, it will allow employees the flexibility to work from where they feel
most productive. For some people, this means not working from home.
Christelle Rohaut is the CEO of Codi, which offers daytime workspaces in private homes
close to where users live. She’s seen first-hand that working from home isn’t always the
best solution: “Assuming that everyone can be as productive and fulfilled working from
home is just not inclusive. Many do not have the right conditions at home to feel
productive every day (roommates, kids, studio, etc.).”
 Provides Co-Working Opportunities
Although much of the current conversation focuses on the difference between working
from home versus working in an office, there is also a third option that provides an
alternative place for remote workers to work, allows for in-person collaboration and
doesn’t require an office — co-working.
Co-working has always been popular in the remote work world as a way to still get
occasional in-person interaction without needing to be tied to an office space. As I
mentioned above, even fully remote or remote-first organizations will still gather
occasionally to co-work. At Buffer, if we have several teammates in one city, they arrange
occasional days where they gather at a co-working space and work alongside each other
for the day.

13
Offering a co-working option is a natural fit for full remote teams and the remote-first
hybrid model. Some remote workers still prefer to work outside of their homes, and pre-
2020 remote work was not necessarily synonymous with working from one’s home. The
most successful way to do remote work, however, does mean thinking remote-first and not
setting up processes for remote workers as an afterthought.
1.8 THE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF REMOTE WORKING ON
EMPLOYEES:
1. Autonomy and Flexibility: Remote work often provides employees with greater
autonomy and flexibility in managing their schedules and work environment. This can
lead to increased job satisfaction and a sense of control over one's work life.
2. Reduced Commute Stress: Eliminating the daily commute can alleviate stress and
improve overall well-being. Employees may experience less fatigue, more time for
personal activities, and a better work-life balance.
3. Isolation and Loneliness: Working remotely can also lead to feelings of isolation and
loneliness, particularly for individuals who thrive on social interactions. The lack of face-
to-face contact with colleagues may result in decreased morale and a sense of
disconnectedness from the team.
4. Communication Challenges: Remote work can pose communication challenges, leading
to misunderstandings, miscommunications, and feelings of being out of the loop. Without
the casual interactions of an office environment, employees may struggle to maintain
strong interpersonal relationships with colleagues.
5. Boundary Blurring: The boundaries between work and personal life can become blurred
in a remote work setup. This can make it challenging for employees to disconnect from
work, leading to burnout, stress, and feelings of being constantly "on."
6. Increased Autonomy vs. Micromanagement: While autonomy is often cited as a benefit
of remote work, some employees may feel micromanaged in a remote setting. Employers
may resort to increased monitoring and surveillance to ensure productivity, which can
erode trust and autonomy.
7. Tech Overload and Digital Fatigue: Remote work relies heavily on digital
communication tools, which can contribute to tech overload and digital fatigue. Constant
screen time and virtual meetings may lead to feelings of exhaustion and cognitive
overload.

14
8. Impact on Mental Health: The psychological impact of remote work on mental health
varies from individual to individual. Some employees may thrive in a remote environment,
while others may struggle with feelings of loneliness, anxiety, or depression.
Understanding these psychological factors is crucial for employers to support their remote
workforce effectively and foster a positive and healthy work environment. Employers can
address these challenges by implementing strategies to promote communication, social
connection, work-life balance, and mental well-being among remote employees.
1.9 FUTURE TRENDS IN REMOTE WORKING:
Future trends in remote working are shaped by evolving technologies, changing workforce
preferences, and global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Here are some potential
future trends to explore:
1. Hybrid Work Models: Many organizations are likely to adopt hybrid work models that
blend remote and in-office work. This approach offers flexibility for employees while
maintaining some level of face-to-face interaction and collaboration.
2. Virtual Reality (VR) Workspaces: VR technology could revolutionize remote work by
creating immersive virtual work environments where remote teams can collaborate, hold
meetings, and simulate physical office spaces.
3. Augmented Reality (AR) for Remote Assistance: AR technology enables remote
workers to receive real-time guidance and support from experts through digital overlays of
instructions or visuals, enhancing productivity and troubleshooting capabilities.
4. AI-driven Productivity Tools: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML)
algorithms will continue to power productivity tools that automate repetitive tasks, provide
personalized recommendations, and optimize workflows for remote workers.
5. Digital Nomadic: With the rise of remote work, more individuals may embrace digital
nomadic, opting to work from anywhere in the world with a reliable internet connection.
This trend could lead to new opportunities and challenges for remote workers and
employers.
6. Remote Work Compliance and Regulation: Governments and regulatory bodies may
introduce new policies and regulations to address issues related to remote work, such as
data privacy, taxation of remote workers, and labor rights for remote employees.

15
7. Focus on Employee Well-being: Employers will increasingly prioritize the well-being of
remote employees by offering resources for mental health support, promoting work-life
balance, and fostering a sense of community and belonging among remote teams.
8. Virtual On boarding and Training: As remote work becomes more prevalent,
organizations will develop innovative approaches to onboard and train remote employees
virtually, leveraging interactive online platforms, simulations, and virtual mentorship
programs.
9. Cyber security and Data Protection: With the expansion of remote work, cyber security
threats will continue to evolve, leading to increased investment in cyber security measures
such as encryption, multi-factor authentication, and employee training on cyber security
best practices.
10. Remote Work and Environmental Sustainability: Remote work can contribute to
environmental sustainability by reducing commuting emissions and office energy
consumption. Organizations may adopt remote work policies with a focus on
environmental stewardship and carbon footprint reduction.
Exploring these trends can provide valuable insights into the future of remote work and help
organizations prepare for the opportunities and challenges that lie ahead.
1.10 MAJOR CHALLENGES ARISE DURING REMOTE WORKING
ADOPTION:
The adoption of remote working presents various challenges for both organizations and
employees. Here are some of the major challenges:
Challenges for Organizations:
1. Maintaining Communication and Collaboration: Remote working can hinder
spontaneous communication and collaboration that naturally occurs in an office
environment. Organizations must invest in effective communication tools and strategies to
ensure seamless collaboration among remote teams.
2. Ensuring Data Security: With employees working outside the traditional office
environment, organizations face increased risks related to data security and privacy.
Safeguarding sensitive information becomes more challenging, requiring robust cyber
security measures and employee training on data protection best practices.

16
3. Monitoring and Managing Employee Performance: Without direct supervision,
monitoring and managing employee performance can be more challenging for
organizations. Establishing clear performance metrics, providing regular feedback, and
implementing performance management tools are essential for ensuring accountability and
productivity among remote workers.
4. Maintaining Company Culture: Remote working can weaken a company's culture by
limiting face-to-face interactions and team-building activities. Organizations must find
creative ways to foster a sense of belonging and camaraderie among remote employees
through virtual events, team bonding exercises, and inclusive communication practices.
5. Addressing Technological Infrastructure Needs: Remote working requires reliable
internet connectivity and access to appropriate technology tools and equipment.
Organizations need to ensure that employees have the necessary resources to perform their
roles effectively, which may involve providing hardware, software, and technical support
for remote work setups.
6. Managing Workload and Burnout: Remote working can blur the boundaries between
work and personal life, leading to potential issues such as overwork and burnout.
Organizations must promote work-life balance, set realistic expectations for workload
management, and encourage employees to take breaks and disconnect from work when
needed.
Challenges for Employees:
1. Isolation and Loneliness: Remote working can lead to feelings of isolation and
loneliness, especially for employees who are accustomed to working in a social office
environment. Lack of social interaction and face-to-face communication can impact
mental well-being and employee morale.
2. Difficulty in Setting Boundaries: Working from home can make it challenging for
employees to establish clear boundaries between work and personal life. Without a
physical separation between the two, employees may struggle to disconnect from work,
leading to feelings of stress and burnout.
3. Distractions and Interruptions: Home environments may present various distractions
and interruptions that can disrupt productivity and concentration. Factors such as
household chores, family members, and noisy neighbours can make it difficult for
employees to stay focused on work tasks.

17
4. Technical Challenges and Connectivity Issues: Remote working relies heavily on
technology, and employees may encounter technical challenges such as internet
connectivity issues, software glitches, or hardware malfunctions. These technical
difficulties can disrupt workflow and cause frustration for remote workers.
5. Limited Access to Resources and Support: Remote employees may have limited access
to resources, support services, and opportunities for career development compared to their
office-based counterparts. Organizations need to ensure that remote workers receive
adequate support, training, and opportunities for professional growth.
6. Work-Life Imbalance: Balancing work commitments with personal responsibilities can
be more challenging for remote employees, especially those with caregiving
responsibilities or other non-work obligations. Without clear boundaries, remote workers
may find it difficult to switch off from work and prioritize self-care.
Addressing these challenges requires a proactive approach from both organizations and
employees, with a focus on effective communication, support, and flexibility to adapt to the
demands of remote working.
1.11 LIMITATIONS TO REMOTE WORKING:
Remote working, while offering numerous benefits, also has its limitations. Here are some
key limitations associated with remote working:

18
1. Limited Face-to-Face Interaction: Remote working reduces face-to-face interaction
among team members, which can hinder spontaneous collaboration, creativity, and
relationship-building that often occurs in an office setting. Lack of in-person
communication may lead to miscommunication, misunderstandings, and a sense of
isolation among remote workers.
2. Dependency on Technology: Remote working relies heavily on technology
infrastructure, including internet connectivity, communication tools, and software
platforms. Technical glitches, internet outages, or compatibility issues can disrupt
workflow and productivity for remote workers, highlighting the importance of robust IT
support and contingency plans.
3. Potential for Social Isolation: Working remotely can lead to feelings of social isolation
and loneliness, especially for individuals who thrive on social interaction and camaraderie
in the workplace. Remote workers may miss out on informal conversations, team bonding
activities, and networking opportunities that contribute to a sense of belonging and
community.
4. Difficulty in Establishing Boundaries: Remote working blurs the boundaries between
work and personal life, making it challenging for employees to disconnect from work and
maintain a healthy work-life balance. Without clear delineation between workspaces and
leisure spaces, remote workers may struggle to set boundaries, leading to overwork,
burnout, and decreased well-being.
5. Communication Challenges: Effective communication is essential for remote teams to
collaborate efficiently and align on goals and priorities. However, remote working
introduces communication challenges such as asynchronous communication, time zone
differences, and reliance on written communication, which can lead to misunderstandings
and delays in decision-making.
6. Monitoring and Accountability: Supervising and monitoring employee performance can
be more challenging in a remote work environment compared to a traditional office
setting. Employers may struggle to assess productivity, track progress on tasks, and ensure
accountability among remote workers, leading to concerns about micromanagement or
underperformance.
7. Limited Access to Resources and Support: Remote workers may have limited access to
resources, support services, and opportunities for career development compared to their
office-based counterparts. Lack of face-to-face interaction with managers and colleagues

19
may hinder mentoring, training, and professional growth opportunities for remote
employees.
8. Security and Privacy Risks: Remote working introduces security and privacy risks, as
employees access company systems and sensitive information from outside the traditional
office environment. Data breaches, unauthorized access, and cyber threats pose significant
challenges for organizations, requiring robust cybersecurity measures and employee
training on data protection best practices.
9. Impact on Company Culture: Remote working can impact company culture by
weakening interpersonal connections, shared values, and cultural norms within
organizations. Maintaining a cohesive company culture and fostering employee
engagement may require innovative strategies and intentional efforts to connect remote
workers with the broader organizational community.
10. Inequities and Accessibility: Remote working may exacerbate inequities and
accessibility challenges for certain groups of employees, including those with disabilities,
caregivers, or individuals with limited access to reliable internet connectivity or suitable
home workspaces. Addressing these inequities requires proactive measures to ensure
equitable opportunities and support for all remote workers.
While remote working offers flexibility and numerous advantages, organizations and
employees must navigate these limitations and implement strategies to overcome challenges
effectively. Adopting a proactive approach, investing in technology and infrastructure,
prioritizing communication and well-being, and fostering a culture of inclusivity and support
can help mitigate the limitations associated with remote working.

20
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
A literature review is a critical evaluation and synthesis of existing literature, scholarly
articles, books, and other sources relevant to a particular topic or research area. It involves
identifying, analysing, and summarizing the key findings, methodologies, theories, and gaps
in knowledge within the chosen field of study.
Here's why a literature review is important:
 It provides a comprehensive overview of existing knowledge, theories, and research
related to the chosen topic. This helps the researcher to understand the historical
context, current state, and evolution of the subject.
 By analysing various sources, a literature review allows researchers to identify gaps in
current knowledge or conflicting findings, which can help in framing research
questions and identifying areas for further investigation.
 Understanding what has already been researched and documented helps in preventing
duplication of efforts and ensures that new research contributes meaningfully to the
existing body of knowledge.
Here are some reviews of literatures:
Thushel Jayaweera (2015) examined the relationship between work environmental factors
and job performance, exploring how work motivation mediated this relationship. The study
highlighted the significance of working conditions and work motivation in explaining the job
performance of hotel workers within the framework of work environmental conditions and
job performance.
Nicholas Bloom (2015) highlighted the operation of work from home, emphasizing the
benefits of learning and selection effects when adopting modern management practices like
WFH. The results suggested a promising future for working from home, showcasing its
potential advantages. The study underscored the efficacy of remote work, indicating its
viability as a mode of operation. As a result, it provided insights into the optimization of
remote work arrangements, shedding light on its positive outcomes. Overall, the research
contributed valuable knowledge to the understanding of remote work dynamics and its
potential implications for the future of work.

21
Dharma Raju Bathini and George Kandathil (2015) identified the discourse on work from
home in global and Indian contexts. The study found that framing work from home as an
employee benefit had created normative pressures on employees to intensify their work. The
discourse, which portrayed work from home as both an employer cost and an employee
benefit, had steepened normative pressures, leading to undesirable outcomes.
Collins (2016) identified social support dynamics among teleworkers, office-based
colleagues, and supervisors. Differences were observed between office-based and permanent
teleworking staff regarding social support. Notably, social support held greater significance
for office-based workers, who prioritized co-worker relationships within their physical
workspace.
Felstead and Henseke (2017) examined the growth of remote working and its consequences
for effort, well-being, and work-life balance. The study revealed that remote working was
associated with higher organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and job-related well-
being. However, these benefits came at the cost of work intensification and a greater inability
to switch off.
Schrita Osborne and Mohamad S. Hammoud (2017) conducted a study on effective
employee engagement in the workplace. Three themes were identified: rewards and
recognition, empowering employees, and fostering a strong bond between leaders and
employees. These themes, if integrated into leadership practices, were believed to have the
potential to foster organizational growth.
Jason C. Gawke (2017) identified employee entrepreneurship and employee engagement.
The results revealed evidence of a positive gain cycle of employee entrepreneurialbehaviour,
personal resources, and work engagement. The practical implication of the study was that
intervening to increase either one of these constructs could be expected to lead to mutual
gains in the others.

22
Simon Albrecht (2018) aimed to identify the significance of the association between
organizationally focused resources, organizational engagement climate, and engagement. The
findings of the study revealed that confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation
modelling (SEM) analysed a good fit to the data.
Vic Benuyenah and Bistra Boukareva (2018) illustrated the changing trends in the field of
HR. The paper focused on the professional experience of the authors in teaching and
developing HR curriculum, as well as literature illustrations from work-based learning. The
results of the study revealed that to achieve relevancy, HR curriculum needed to focus more
on professional work-based skills that were pertinent to the contemporary workplace and
restructure exam formats to be in line with skills required in the HR profession.
Setyo Riyanto (2019) examined the effect of the work environment on flexible working
hours, employee engagement, and employee motivation. The results indicated an influence of
work-life balance and flexible working hours on employee engagement. Employee
motivation was found to have mediated the relationship between the work environment and
flexible working hours concerning employee engagement.
Setyo Riyanto (2019) examined the work-life balance and its influence on employee
engagement in the Y generation within the courier service industry. The results revealed the
importance of continuously measuring employee workload for optimizing staff utilization
within courier companies.
Timothy D. Golden and Ravi S. Gajendran (2019) conducted a study aimed at unpacking
the role of a telecommuter's job in their performance. The findings of the study revealed that
for telecommuters who held complex jobs, for those in jobs involving low levels of
interdependence, and for those in jobs with low levels of social support, the extent of
telecommuting had a positive association with job performance. These results indicated that
telecommuting positively influenced job performance under specific conditions, such as job
complexity, low interdependence, and low social support. The study provided valuable
insights into the relationship between telecommuting and job performance in various job
contexts.

23
Farheen Fathima Shaik and Upam Pushpak Makhecha (2019) examined the drivers of
employee engagement in global virtual teams. The study utilized the Job Demands-Resources
theory of employee engagement to derive these drivers. Five key drivers were
conceptualized: cultural intelligence, communication (both formal and informal), technology,
trust, and individual maturity. These factors were analysed to understand their impact on
employee engagement within the context of global virtual teams. The study provided insights
into the dynamics of virtual teamwork and shed light on the importance of various factors in
fostering employee engagement in such environments.
Julyan Adhitamaa and Setyo Riyanto (2020) examined the influence of the work
environment on employee engagement and performance was examined. The findings
indicated that engagement and performance were affected by social cohesion.
Talina Mishra and Lalatendu Kesari Jena (2020) aimed to integrate the concept of lean in
the realm of virtual leadership by continuously engaging employees and building efficient
teams to enhance the effectiveness of digital workplaces. The findings of the study revealed
that lean leadership served as a great way to boost employee morale and enrich their
experience during times of global crisis. Employees could effectively contribute to the
organization with the assistance of virtual lean teams and tools.
Barbara Z. Larson (2020) conducted a study aimed at offering guidance for managing
remote workers. They found that remote work was enhanced in terms of efficiency and
satisfaction when managers established clear expectations regarding the frequency, methods,
and optimal timing of communication for their teams. By setting such expectations, managers
were able to create a more conducive environment for remote work, facilitating smoother
operations and improved employee morale. The findings of this study underscored the
importance of proactive communication strategies in remote work settings, highlighting the
role of managers in fostering productive and fulfilling remote work experiences for their
teams.
Bryce C (2021) examined the historic dynamics and strategic priorities that had undermined
the NHS's attempts to navigate troubled times. The authors noted that an overreliance on

24
perceived efficiency benefits of 'lean production' and 'just in time' continuity planning had
superseded strategic redundancy and slack in the system.
Dr. Shachi Yadav (2021) aimed to comprehend the impact of the virtual workplace on
employee engagement. The study revealed that fostering engagement among employees in a
virtual setting proved challenging. Various factors were identified, such as communication
barriers, lack of face-to-face interaction, and difficulties in building rapport remotely. Despite
efforts to mitigate these challenges through technological solutions and virtual team-building
activities, the overall findings indicated persistent hurdles in achieving high levels of
employee engagement within virtual work environments.
Vic Benuyenah and Bharti Pandya (2022) conducted a study to analyse employee
happiness in the UAE. They proposed a straightforward data collection method at the
organizational level. The study aimed to correlate individualized accounts of happiness with
organizational productivity and integrate them into the broader national statistics on gross
national product and public well-being.
Nisha Channana and Sangeeta (2022) determined various employee engagement practices
that various companies had taken up during the pandemic to foster employee engagement.
The study highlighted online trainings, team meet-ups, appreciation sessions, etc., as various
practices aimed at ensuring employee engagement. These initiatives were implemented to
keep employees engaged and motivated towards their jobs amidst the challenging
circumstances of the pandemic. The research showcased how companies had adapted their
engagement strategies to suit remote work environments and maintain a sense of connection
and morale among their workforce.
Toyin Ajibade Adisa (2023) explored how remote working inhibited employee engagement.
The study revealed that the sudden transition from in-person to online modes of working
during the pandemic had brought about work intensification, online presenters, employment
insecurity, and poor adaptation to new ways of working from home. These factors
collectively contributed to a decline in employee engagement levels. The shift to remote work
exacerbated challenges, hindering effective communication and collaboration among

25
employees. Additionally, the lack of clear boundaries between work and personal life further
exacerbated the situation, leading to increased stress and burnout.
LaxmipradaPattnaik and Lalatendu Kesari Jena (2023) explored the inter-linkages of
mindfulness, remote engagement, and employee morale as a solution to the new normal
during the pandemic. The study examined how these factors contributed to coping strategies
amid unprecedented challenges. It delved into the effectiveness of mindfulness practices in
fostering employee well-being and how remote engagement initiatives played a pivotal role
in maintaining connectivity and productivity in a remote work setup. Moreover, the study
analysed the impact of these interventions on employee morale, highlighting their
significance in adapting to the evolving work landscape. By investigating these dynamics, the
research shed light on viable approaches to navigating the uncertainties brought forth by the
pandemic.
Vijay Chaudhary (2024) conducted research to examine and statistically assess factors
impacting employee engagement levels. The results indicated that proper virtual tools,
contact by organizational leaders, mental health check-ups, and virtual training increased
employee engagement.
RESEARCH GAP:
While significant research exists on remote work, there remains a gap in understanding how
remote work specifically influences career growth and long-term employee engagement.
Additionally, the effectiveness of communication between employees and managers, the
impact on productivity and job satisfaction, and the nuances of social connectedness among
remote workers are underexplored. Comprehensive studies integrating these dimensions can
provide deeper insights into optimizing remote work environments

26
3 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY:
3.1 TITLE OF THE STUDY
I, Ranvir Singh student of MBA 4th and I have done my research on the topic titled “A study
on the engagement of employees during remote working” that focusing on employee
engagement, career growth, communication effectiveness between employees and managers,
impact on productivity and job satisfaction, and social connectedness. This study aims to
understand remote work's holistic impact on organizational dynamics and employee well-
being.
3.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:
1. To study the employee engagement and career growth of employees while remote
working.
2. To observe the effectiveness of the communication between the employee and the
manager.
3. To assess the impact of remote working on employee productivity and job satisfaction.
3.3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY:
This study aims to comprehensively examine the intersection of remote work with employee
engagement, career progression, and overall well-being. It will investigate the efficacy of
communication channels between employees and managers, evaluating its influence on
productivity and job satisfaction. Additionally, the research will delve into the social
connectedness among remote workers to understand its implications for team cohesion and
collaboration. By analyzing these factors, the study intends to offer insights into optimizing
remote work practices to foster enhanced engagement, career development, and
organizational effectiveness, thereby contributing to the evolving discourse on modern
workplace dynamics.
3.4 RESEARCH DESIGN:
Research design acts as a blueprint or structured framework for conducting investigations and
gathering data to address research questions or hypotheses effectively. It outlines the
methods, procedures, and techniques to be employed, ensuring the study's validity, reliability,
and relevance. In other words, research design is a strategy for answering research questions
using empirical data. This research is Descriptive research, which aims to accurately and

27
systematically describe a population, situation or phenomenon. It can answer what, when, and
how questions, but not why questions.
3.5 SAMPLE DESIGN:
 Universe: The universe typically refers to the entire population or set of elements that are
being studied or analysed within a particular context. The study focused on individuals
from various organizations, constituting the universe under examination.
 Sample Size: Sample size refers to the number of individual units included in a study or
survey. The survey was carried out of around 100 respondents.
 Sample Unit: It indicates who is to be surveyed. In this study, employees of different
organizations were the sampling units.
 Sampling Techniques: Convenience sampling techniques was being used.
3.6 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
Data collection
 Primary sources: Primary data are those which are collected for the first time and thus
happened to be original in character. It is the backbone of the study. It was obtained from
respondents with the help of widely used and well-known method of survey through a
well-known structured questionnaire. In this study, I gather primary data through a 15
questions employee questionnaire, enabling me to collect comprehensive insights directly
from the individuals involved in this study.
 Secondary sources: Secondary data are those which have already been collected by
someone else and which have already been passed through the statistical process.
Secondary data is either published data or unpublished data. In the study, secondary data
was collected from websites and books. Secondary data was collected for introduction part
and review of literature.

28
4. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION:
Table 4.1: Table Showing Age group of respondents:
Particulars No. of respondents Percentage
18-25 years 44 44%
26-40 years 49 49%
41-50 years 6 6%
Above 50 years 1 1%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.1 showing the age of respondents
Interpretation:
The table 4.1 and chart 4.1 shows that majority of the individuals i.e. 49%, fall within 26-40
years, followed by 18-25 years with 44%. Only a small percentage, 6%, represents the 41-50
age brackets, and a mere 1% are above 50 years old. This suggests a predominant
representation of younger and middle-aged individuals.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
18-25 years 26-40 years 41-50 years Above 50 years
AGE OF RESPONDENTS

29
Table 4.2: Showing the gender of individuals:
Particulars No. of response Percentage
Male 68 68%
Female 32 32%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.2: showing the gender of respondents
Interpretation:
The table 4.2 and chart 4.2 represents a gender distribution in which 68 responses are from
males, constituting 68% of the total, while 32 responses are from females, making up 32%. It
indicates a majority of male respondents in the sample. The percentages provide a clear
overview of the gender composition within the dataset.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Male Female
GENDER OF RESPONDENTS
Male Female

30
Table 4.3: Showing the educational qualifications of respondents:
Particulars No. of responses Percentage
Matric 1 1%
Post matric 15 15%
Graduate 70 70%
Post graduate 14 14%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.3: Showing the educational qualification of respondents:
Interpretation:
Table 4.3 and chart 4.3 presents’ data on the educational qualifications of respondents. Out of
100 responses, 1% holds a Matrices qualification, while 15% have completed Post matric
studies. The majority, comprising 70%, are Graduates, followed by 14% who are Post
graduates. This breakdown suggests a predominance of Graduate-level education among the
respondents, with a smaller portion holding higher qualifications.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Matric Intermediate Graduate Post graduate
EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION

31
Table 4.4: Showing the occupation of the respondents:
Worker 11 11%
Employee 71 71%
Employer 14 14%
Professional 4 4%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.4: Showing the occupation of the respondents:
Interpretation:
Table 4.4 and chart 4.4 shows a breakdown of respondents by occupation: 11% are workers,
71% are employees, 14% are employers, and 4% are professionals. The majority, 71%, are
employees, indicating a significant presence in the surveyed population. Employers and
workers each constitute a notable portion at 14% and 11%, respectively. Professionals make
up the smallest group at 4%. This distribution offers insights into the occupational
composition of the sample.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Worker Employee Employer Professional
OCCUPATION OF RESPONDENTS
Series1 Series2

32
Table 4.5: Showing how many hours of a day respondents work from home:
5-7 hours 14 14%
8-10 hours 76 76%
11-13 hours 8 8%
More than 13 hours of a day 2 2%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.5: Showing the working hours of respondents work from home:
Interpretation:
Table 4.5 and chart 4.5 indicates that the majority of respondents, 76%, work between 8 to 10
hours a day. 14% work for 5-7 hours, while 8% work for 11-13 hours. Only 2% reported
working more than 13 hours a day. This suggests a prevalent trend towards standard full-time
working hours, with a smaller portion working extended hours.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
5-7 hours 8-10 hours 11-13 hours More than 13 hours of
a day
WORKING HOURS OF RESPONDENTS
Series1 Series2

33
Table 4.6: Showing the primary reason for remote working:
Increase flexibility 36 36%
Avoiding commute 29 29%
Better work life balance 35 35%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.6: Showing the primary reason for remote working:
Interpretation:
Table 4.6 and chart 4.6 shows the primary reasons for remote working are increased
flexibility, cited by 36% of respondents, and avoiding commutes, noted by 29%.
Additionally, 35% of respondents mentioned seeking a better work-life balance. These
findings highlight a strong desire among workers for flexibility and a reduction in commuting
time, as well as a recognition of the importance of balancing work and personal life.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Increase flexibility Avoiding commute Better work life balance
REASON FOR REMOTE WORKING
Series1 Series2

34
Table 4.7: Showing the productivity when working remotely compared to working in
the office:
Much higher 43 43%
Slightly higher 48 48%
About the same 8 8%
Lower 1 1%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.7: Showing the productivity when working remotely compared to working in
the office:
Interpretation:
Table 4.7 and chart 4.7 indicates that 43% of respondents reported significantly higher
productivity while working remotely, with 48% experiencing a slight increase. Only 8%
found productivity levels to be similar in both settings, and a mere 1% reported lower
productivity when working remotely. Overall, the majority of respondents perceived remote
work as more productive than traditional office settings.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Much higher Slightly higher About the same Lower
PRODUCTIVITY OF RESPONDENTS
Series1 Series2

35
Table 4.8: Showing tools used for remote collaboration:
Particular No. of respondents Percentage
Slack 26 26%
Microsoft team 38 38%
Google meet 28 28%
Zoom 8 8%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.8: Showing tools used for remote collaboration:
Interpretation:
Table 4.8 and chart 4.8 illustrates tools utilized for remote collaboration based on a survey.
Among respondents, Microsoft Teams was the most popular choice, with 38% utilizing it,
followed closely by Google Meet at 28%. Slack was used by 26% of respondents, while
Zoom had the lowest usage at 8%. These findings indicate a diverse range of platforms
employed for remote collaboration, with Microsoft Teams being the most prevalent.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Slack Microsoft team Google meet Zoom
TOOLS USED FOR REMOTE COLLABORATION
Series1 Series2

36
Table 4.9: Showing the satisfaction of the respondents with the current level of
engagement while remote working:
Very satisfied 40 40%
Satisfied 50 50%
Neutral 17 17%
Dissatisfied 2 2%
Very dissatisfied 1 1%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.9: Showing the satisfaction of the respondents with the current level of
engagement while remote working:
Interpretation:
Table 4.9 and chart 4.9 revealed high satisfactions with remote work engagement among
respondents, with 90% being either very satisfied (40%) or satisfied (50%). A small portion
remains neutral (17%), while dissatisfaction is minimal, with only 2% dissatisfied and 1%
very dissatisfied, reflecting overall positive sentiment towards remote work engagement.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very
dissatisfied
CURRENT LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT
No. of respondents Percentage

37
Table 4.10: Showing that remote working has positively impacted your career growth:
Satisfied 47 47%
Neutral 13 13%
Dissatisfied 2 2%
Very dissatisfied 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.10: Showing that remote working has positively impacted your career growth:
Interpretation:
Table 4.10 and chart 4.10 illustrates the positive impact of remote working on career growth
based on a survey. The majority of respondents, 85%, reported satisfaction (38% very
satisfied, 47% satisfied), while 13% were neutral. Only a small proportion, 2%, expressed
dissatisfaction. Remarkably, none reported being very dissatisfied. This suggests remote
work generally fosters career advancement, with high satisfaction levels among respondents.
0
10
20
30
40
50
Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very
dissatisfied
IMPACT ON CAREER GROWTH

38
Table 4.11: Showing How often respondents communicate with their manager while
remote working:
Daily 12 12%
Several times a week 55 55%
Weekly 30 30%
Rarely 3 3%
Never 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.11: Showing How often respondents communicate with their manager while
remote working:
Interpretation:
Table 4.11 and chart 4.11 shows that the majority of respondents (55%) communicate with
their manager several times a week, followed by 30% who communicate weekly. Only 12%
communicate daily, while a small percentage (3%) does so rarely. Interestingly, none of the
respondents reported never communicating with their manager while remote working,
indicating a consistent level of interaction.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Daily Several times a
week
Weekly Rarely Never
COMMUNICATION WITH MANAGER

39
Table 4.12: Showing that has remote working affected respondent’s productivity
positively or negatively:
Positively 79 79%
Negatively 6 6%
No impact 10 10%
Unsure 5 5%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.12: Showing that has remote working affected respondent’s productivity
positively or negatively:
Interpretation:
Table 4.12 and chart 4.12 shows that the impact of remote working on productivity varied
among respondents. 79% reported a positive effect, while 6% experienced a negative impact.
Additionally, 10% stated no noticeable difference, and 5% were unsure. These results suggest
that for the majority, remote work has led to increased productivity, with only a small
minority reporting negative effects or uncertainty.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Positively Negatively No impact Unsure
EFFECT ON PRODUCTIVITY OF RESPONDENTS

40
Table 4.13: Showing that remote working has provided respondents with a better work-
life balance:
Strongly agree 34 34%
Agree 59 59%
Neutral 5 5%
Disagree 2 2%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.13: Showing that remote working has provided respondents with a better work-
life balance
Interpretation:
Table 4.13 and chart 4.13 that remote working significantly improves the work-life balance
of respondents. A majority, 93%, either strongly agree (34%) or agree (59%) with this notion.
Only a negligible percentage disagrees, with 5% remaining neutral. Notably, no respondents
strongly disagree. This indicates a widespread acknowledgment of remote work's positive
impact on work-life balance among the surveyed individuals.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
WORK-LIFE BALANCE

41
Table 4.14: Showing How connected do respondents feel to your colleagues while
remote working:
Very connected 30 30%
Connected 62 62%
Neutral 7 7%
Disagree 1 1%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.14: Showing how connected do respondents feel to your colleagues while remote
working:
Interpretation:
Table 4.14 and chart 4.14 shows that 30% of respondents feel "Very connected" to their
colleagues while remote working, while 62% feel "Connected." Only 7% are neutral, and 1%
disagree with feeling connected. No respondents strongly disagree. Overall, the majority feel
some level of connection to their colleagues despite remote work arrangements.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Very connected Connected Neutral Disagree
CONNECTION TO COLLEAGUES

42
Table 4.15: Showing the participation in any virtual team-building activities while
remote working:
Yes, frequently 36 36%
Yes, occasionally 57 57%
No, but I would like to 7 7%
No, I am not interested 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.15: Showing the participation in any virtual team-building activities while
remote working:
Interpretation:
Table 4.15 and chart 4.15 shows that out of 100 respondents surveyed, 36% frequently
participate in virtual team-building activities while remote working, while 57% engage
occasionally. Interestingly, 7% express interest despite not currently participating, while none
show disinterest. This suggests a substantial inclination towards virtual team-building
activities among remote workers, with potential for increased participation if facilitated
effectively.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Yes, frequently Yes, occasionally No, but I would like
to
No, I am not
interested
PARTICIPATION IN TEAM BUILDING ACTIVITIES

43
Table 4.16: Showing that how often respondents receive feedback from your manager
while remote working:
Weekly 29 29%
Bi-weekly 46 46%
Monthly 23 23%
Rarely 2 2%
Never 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.16: Showing that how often respondents receive feedback from your manager
Interpretation:
Table 4.16 and chart 4.16 illustrates the frequency of feedback received from managers while
remote working. Approximately 29% of respondents receive feedback weekly, 46% bi-
weekly, and 23% monthly. Only 2% receive feedback rarely, and none reported never
receiving feedback. This suggests that the majority of respondents receive feedback regularly,
which is crucial for effective remote work communication and performance management.
0
10
20
30
40
50
Weekly Bi-weekly Monthly Rarely Never
FFEDBACK FROM MANAGER

44
Table 4.17: Showing that how valued respondents feel as a remote employee within the
organization:
Very valued 26 26%
Valued 62 62%
Neutral 9 9%
Undervalued 3 3%
Very undervalued 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.17: Showing that how valued respondents feel as a remote employee within the
organization:
Interpretation:
Table 4.17 and chart 4.17 shows that 88% of respondents feel valued or very valued as
remote employees within their organization. However, a small portion (12%) feels neutral,
undervalued, or very undervalued. This suggests that a significant majority perceive
themselves positively, indicating the organization's success in making remote workers feel
appreciated, although there is room for improvement for the minority.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Very valued Valued Neutral
Undervalued
Very
undervalued
FEELING VALUED

45
Table 4.18: Showing that remote working has affected respondent’s job satisfaction:
Positively 78 78%
Negatively 5 5%
No impact 10 10%
Unsure 7 7%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.18: Showing that remote working has affected respondent’s job satisfaction:
Interpretation:
Table 4.18 and chart 4.18 illustrates the impact of remote working on job satisfaction among
respondents. 78% reported a positive effect, while only 5% felt negatively impacted. Ten
percent experienced no change, and 7% were uncertain about the effect. Overall, remote work
seems to have predominantly increased job satisfaction among the surveyed individuals.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Positively Negatively No impact Unsure
EFFECT ON JOB SATISFACTION

46
Table 4.19: Showing engagement in informal interactions with colleagues while remote
working:
Daily 20 20%
Several times a week 58 58%
Weekly 21 21%
Rarely 1 1%
Never 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.19: Showing engagement in informal interactions with colleagues while remote
working:
Interpretation:
Table 4.19 and chart 4.19 illustrates the frequency of informal interactions among remote
workers. Majority (78%) engage several times a week or daily, fostering regular
communication. Weekly interactions are reported by 21%, while rare occurrences are
minimal (1%). Notably, no respondents reported never engaging in informal interactions,
indicating a pervasive culture of communication despite physical distance.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Daily Several times a
week
Weekly Rarely Never
ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMAL INTERACTIONS
WITH COLLEAGUES

47
Table 4.20: Showing any challenges with technology/tools while remote working:
Yes, frequently 72 72%
Yes, occasionally 27 27%
No, not at all 1 1%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.20: Showing any challenges with technology/tools while remote working:
Interpretation:
Table 4.20 and chart 4.20 shows that 72% reported facing frequent challenges with
technology/tools, while 27% encountered occasional issues. Remarkably, only 1% stated they
experienced no difficulties at all. These findings highlight the prevalent hurdles individuals
face when relying on technology for remote work, underscoring the need for effective
solutions and support mechanisms.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Yes, frequently Yes, occasionally No, not at all
CHALLENGES WITH TECHNOLOGY/TOOLS

48
Table 4.21: Showing the effectiveness of virtual meetings while remote working:
Very effective 26 26%
Effective 60 60%
Neutral 13 13%
Not very effective 1 1%
Not effective at all 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.21: Showing the effectiveness of virtual meetings while remote working:
Interpretation:
Table 4.21 and chart 4.21 illustrates the effectiveness of virtual meetings in remote work
settings based on respondent feedback. A majority, 86%, find them either very effective
(26%) or effective (60%), indicating strong approval. A small percentage (13%) remains
neutral, while only 1% perceives them as not very effective. None fined virtual meetings
completely ineffective, suggesting overall positive sentiment towards their utility in remote
work.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Very effective Effective Neutral Not very
effective
Not effective
at all
EFFECTIVENESS OF VIRTUAL MEETINGS

49
Table 4.22: Showing level of collaboration within team while remote working:
Satisfied 61 61%
Neutral 1 1%
Not very satisfied 1 1%
Not satisfied at all 2 2%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.22: Showing level of collaboration within team while remote working:
Interpretation:
Table 4.22 and chart 4.22 shows that 35% of respondents reported being very satisfied with
team collaboration while remote working, followed by 61% who felt satisfied. Only 1% was
neutral, while 1% expressed being not very satisfied. Another 2% were not satisfied at all.
Overall, the majority reported satisfaction, indicating a generally positive perception of
remote collaboration within the team.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Not very
satisfied
Not satisfied at
all
LEVEL OF COLLABORATION WITHIN TEAM

50
Table 4.23: Showing training and resources to support remote working:
Yes 80 80%
No 5 5%
Partially 15 15%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.23: Showing training and resources to support remote working:
Interpretation:
Table 4.23 and chart 4.23 shows that 80% of respondents confirmed having training and
resources to facilitate remote working, while 5% lacked such provisions. 15% indicated
partial support. This suggests a majority have the necessary tools and training, albeit a
notable portion may require additional resources or training to fully enable remote work.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Yes No Partially
SUPPORT OF TRAINING AND RESOURCES

51
Table 4.24: Showing transparency of organisation regarding decisions and changes
Very transparent 28 28%
Transparent 60 60%
Neutral 10 10%
Not very transparent 1 1%
Not transparent at all 1 1%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.24: Showing transparency of organisation regarding decisions and changes
Interpretation:
Table 4.24 and chart 4.24 indicate 28% of respondents found their organization to be very
transparent, while 60% perceived transparency to some degree. However, 10% remained
neutral, and only 2% expressed dissatisfaction, with one respondent each stating the
organization was not very transparent or transparent at all. Overall, transparency appears
reasonably maintained in remote work setups.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Very
transparent
Transparent Neutral Not very
transparent
Not
transparent at all
TRANSPARENCY REGARDING DECISIONS AND
CHANGES

52
Table 4.25: Showing that how remote working aligns with the organization's values and
culture:
Very well 42 42%
Well 52 52%
Neutral 5 5%
Poor 1 1%
Very poor 0 0%
Total 100 100%
Chart 4.25: Showing that how remote working aligns with the organization's values and
culture
Interpretation:
Table 4.25 and chart 4.25 illustrates the alignment of remote working with the organization's
values and culture. 42% of respondents perceive remote work as aligning "Very well," while
52% find it aligns "Well." Only 1% views the alignment as "Poor," and none consider it
"Very poor." 5% remain neutral. Overall, a majority of respondents view remote work
positively in relation to organizational values and culture.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Very well Well Neutral Poor Very poor
ALIGNMENT OF REMOTE WORKING WITH
ORGANISATIONAL VALUES AND CULTURE

53
5. FINDINGS OF THE STUDY:
 It is observed that most of the individuals are between 26-40 years (49%).
 It is observed that most of the individuals performing remote working are male (68%).
 It is observed that majority of the individuals are graduate (70%).
 It is studied that most of the individuals are employees performing remote working (71%).
 Most individuals work 8-10 hours daily (76%), with fewer working shorter or longer
hours, indicating a preference for standard schedules.
 It is founded that remote work driven by flexibility (36%), commute avoidance (29%), and
pursuit of work-life balance (35%).
 It is far determined that 91% of individuals report higher or similar productivity when
working remotely, favouring it over traditional office settings.
 It is observed that Microsoft Teams (38%) emerged as the top choice for remote
collaboration, followed by Google Meet (28%), Slack (26%), and Zoom (8%).
 It is observed that Remote work fosters career growth with 85% satisfaction among
respondents; only 2% expressed dissatisfaction, indicating positive impact.
 It is far determined that remote workers mostly communicate several times a week (55%),
followed by weekly (30%) with managers, maintaining consistent interaction.
 It is observed that most of the individuals agreed that remote working has affected their
productivity positively (79%).
 It is far found that 93% of respondents agree remote work improves work-life balance; no
strong disagreements; widespread acknowledgment of its positive impact.
 It is found that 92% of remote workers feel connected to colleagues, with majority
reporting a strong or moderate sense of connection.
 It is observed that regular feedback is common among respondents, with 78% receiving it
weekly or bi-weekly, vital for remote work.
 It is far determined that high interest in virtual team-building among remote workers;
93% participate or express interest, indicating potential for increased engagement.
 It is observed that 88% of remote workers feel valued, indicating organizational success;
12% feel neutral or undervalued, suggesting improvement opportunities.
 It is founded that 88% of remote employees feel valued, indicating organizational
success; 12% feel undervalued, suggesting room for improvement.

54
 It is far determined pervasive communication culture with 78% engaging daily, 21%
weekly; rare occurrences minimal; no one reported never engaging.
 It is determined that majority (98%) reported satisfaction with remote team collaboration,
indicating positive perception, with only minor dissatisfaction.
 Most individuals (88%) perceive moderate to high transparency in their organization,
with few expressing dissatisfactions.
 It is studied that 45% Favor remote work, 33% prefer office, 22% hybrid, indicating
strong interest in remote and hybrid options.
 It is far determined that 99% reported improvement in task concentration, with 68%
significant and 31% moderate enhancements, 1% no change.
 It is determined that majority of the individuals excellently rate the overall support
provided by your organization for remote working (51%).
SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATION:
Suggestions
 Organisations should give the majority preference for remote work driven by flexibility;
commute avoidance, and work-life balance, companies should develop flexible remote
work policies that cater to individual preferences.
 Since remote workers predominantly use Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack, and
Zoom for collaboration, organizations should invest in these platforms and provide
training to ensure effective usage. Additionally, consider exploring emerging
technologies to enhance remote collaboration further.
 With the importance of regular feedback highlighted for remote work success,
organizations should establish robust feedback mechanisms.
 Organisations should give the high interest in virtual team-building among remote
workers, companies should organize regular virtual team-building activities to foster team
cohesion and boost morale.
 Organisations should give the high interest in virtual team-building among remote
workers, companies should organize regular virtual team-building activities to foster team
cohesion and boost morale.

55
Recommendation:
 Implement targeted initiatives to support career growth and skill development for remote
workers, capitalizing on the high satisfaction (85%) observed in this area.
 Foster a communication-rich environment, ensuring regular feedback sessions (weekly or
bi-weekly) to sustain productivity and engagement among remote teams (78% receive
feedback at this frequency).
 Prioritize virtual team-building activities to enhance camaraderie and collaboration
among remote workers, leveraging the high interest (93%) in such initiatives.
 Enhance transparency and recognition efforts to address the 12% of remote employees
who feel undervalued, thereby bolstering organizational success and employee
satisfaction.
 Tailor remote work policies to accommodate diverse preferences, considering the strong
interest in remote and hybrid options (45% favor remote work, 22% prefer hybrid).

56
CONCLUSION:
Firstly, it's evident that remote work has gained significant traction, particularly among
individuals aged 26-40, who make up nearly half of the workforce surveyed. This
demographic, likely seeking flexibility and work-life balance, has embraced remote work as a
preferred mode of employment.
Moreover, the study underscores the predominantly positive impact of remote work on
productivity, with over 90% of respondents reporting similar or higher levels of productivity
compared to traditional office settings. This increase in productivity can be attributed to
factors such as flexibility, reduced commuting time, and improved work-life balance.
Additionally, remote work has facilitated enhanced communication and collaboration, with
platforms like Microsoft Teams and Google Meet emerging as popular choices for remote
collaboration. Regular feedback and virtual team-building activities further contribute to
maintaining a sense of connection and engagement among remote workers.
Looking ahead, there is a clear preference for remote and hybrid work models, with a
significant portion of respondents favouring these options over traditional office setups. This
highlights the need for organizations to adapt to evolving work trends and provide flexible
arrangements that cater to the diverse needs and preferences of their workforce.
In conclusion, the findings underscore the transformative impact of remote work on modern
work culture, with its widespread adoption driven by factors such as flexibility, productivity
gains, and improved work-life balance. By addressing challenges and embracing flexible
work models, organizations can harness the full potential of remote work to foster employee
satisfaction, engagement, and organizational success in the digital age.
LIMITATION OF THE STUDY:
 While the majority of individuals are between 26-40 years old, there's a lack of
representation or understanding of the preferences and challenges faced by individuals
outside of this age bracket.
 This study was conducted among 100 respondents.
 Although most remote workers are male, there's a notable absence of insights into the
experiences and perspectives of female employees in remote settings.

57
REFERENCES:
Articles, Journals and website links
 Adhitama, J. and Riyanto, S. (2020), ―Maintaining Employee Engagement and
Employee Performance during Covid-19 Pandemic at PT KoeximMandiri Finance:
https://www.academia.edu/42818538/.
 Ajibade Adisa T. et al (2021), ―Remote working and employee engagement: a
qualitative study of British workers during the pandemic, Information Technology &
People, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 1835-1850. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-12-2020-0850.
 Albrecht, S., Breidahl, E. and Marty, A. (2018), ―Organizational resources,
organizational engagement climate, and employee engagement‖. Career Development
International, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 67-85.
 Bathini, D. R., & Kandathil, G. (2015). Work from home: a boon or a bane? The missing
piece of employee cost. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 568-574.
 Bloom, A. N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Jenny, Y. (2015). Does Working from Home
Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
130(1), 165- 218.
 Bryce, C., Ring, P., Ashby, S. and Wardman, J. K. (2020), ―Resilience in the face of
uncertainty: early lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic‖. Journal of Risk Research, Vol.
23, No. 7-8, pp. 880-887.
 Collins, A. M., Hislop, D. and Cartwright, S. (2016), ―Social support in the workplace
between teleworkers, office‐based colleagues and supervisors‖. New Technology, Work
and Employment, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 161-175.
 Dr. Yadav S. et al ( 2020) , ―Employee Engagement Strategy for Employees Working in
Virtual Environment in the IT Industry, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1),
165- 218.
 F.F. Shaik, U.P. Makhecha, Drivers of employee engagement in global virtual teams,
Australasian J. Inf. Syst. (2019), https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v23i0.1770.
 Felstead, A. and Henseke, G. (2017), ―Assessing the growth of remote working and its
consequences for effort, well‐being and work‐life balance‖. New Technology, Work, &
Employment, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 195-212.

58
 Golden, T.D. and Gajendran, R.S. (2019), ―Unpacking the role of a telecommuter ‘s job
in their performance: examining job complexity, problem solving, interdependence and
social support‖, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 55-69.
 Jayaweera, T. (2015), Impact of work environmental factors on job performance,
mediating role of work motivation: A study of hotel sector in England. International
Journal of Business and Management, 10(3), 56-67.
 Larson, B.Z., Vroman, S.R. and Makarius, E.E. (2020), ―A guide to managing your
(newly) remote workers‖, available at: https://hbr.org/2020/03/a-guide-to-managing-your-
newlyremote-workers (accessed 15 April 2020).
 Mishra, T. and Jena, L. (2020), ―Virtual workplaces and lean leadership: integrative
conceptualization and organizational implications‖, Strategic HR Review, Vol. 19 No. 4,
pp. 21-24.
 N. Chanana, Sangeeta, Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown, J.
Public Affairs (2020), https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2508.
 Osborne, S., & Hammoud, M. S. (2017). Effective Employee Engagement in the
Workplace. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 16(1), 50–67.
 Pattnaik L and Kesari Jena L (2021), ―Mindfulness, remote engagement and employee
morale: conceptual analysis to address the ―new normal, International Journal of
Organizational Analysis, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 873-890. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-
2020-2267.
 Riyanto, S., Ariyanto, E., and Lukertina. (2019), Work Life Balance and its Influence on
Employee Engagement ―Y‖ Generation in Courier Service Industry. International
Review of Management and Marketing, 9(6), 25-31.
 Setiyani, A., Djumarno, Riyanto, S., and Nawangsari, L. C. (2019), The Effect of Work
Environment on Flexible Working Hours, Employee Engagement and Employee
Motivation. International Review of Management and Marketing, 9(3), 112-116.
 V. Benuyenah, B. Boukareva, Making HRM curriculum relevant–a hypothetical
practitioners ‘guide, J. Work-Appl. Manage. (2018) Part 2, pp. 456-543.
 V. Benuyenah, B. Pandya, measuring employee happiness in the UAE– integrating
organisational data into the national statistics, Int. Rev. Manage. Mark. 10 (3) (2022) 83–
92.
 Van Wingerden, J., Bakker, A.B. and Derks, D. (2023), ―Fostering employee well-being
via a job crafting intervention‖, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 100, pp. 164-174.

59
 Vijay Chaudhary et al, (2024), ―Factors affecting virtual employee engagement in India
during Covid-19, Pages 383-398.
ONLINE LINKS:
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_work.
 https://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/what-is-a-remote-job/.
 https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/work-from-home-policies.
 https://factorialhr.com/blog/remote-work-policy/.
 https://hr.njit.edu/benefits-remote-work.
 https://zapier.com/blog/remote-work-challenges/.
 https://envoy.com/blog/what-is-a-hybrid-work-model.
 https://www.deskbird.com/blog/remote-working-advantages-and-disadvantages.

60
QUESTIONNAIRE:
Dear respondent
I am pursuing my MBA from Sant Baba Bhag Singh University Khiala, Jalandhar. The
purpose of questionnaire is to survey the perception of an individual about the remote
working. The given data will be used for study purpose only and it kept confidential.
Name: _________________
1. Age:
a) 18-25 years b) 26-40 years
c) 41-50 years d) Above 50 years
2. Gender:
a) Male b) Female
3. Educational qualification:
a) Matric b) Intermediate
c) Graduate d) Post graduate
4. Occupation:
a) Worker b) Employee
c) Employer d) Professional
5. How many hours of a day you do work from home?
a) 5-7 hours b) 8-10 hours
c) 11-13 hours d) More than 13 hours a day
6. What is your primary reason for remote work?
a) Increase flexibility b) Avoiding commute
c) Better work life balance d) Others

61
7. How do you rate your productivity when working remotely compared to working in
the office?
a) Much higher b) Slightly higher
c) About the same d) Lower
8. Which of the following tools do you use most frequently for remote collaboration?
a) Slack b) Microsoft team
c) Google meet d) Zoom
e) Others
9. How satisfied are you with your current level of engagement while remote working?
a) Very satisfied b) Satisfied
c) Neutral d) Dissatisfied
e) Very dissatisfied
10. Do you feel that remote working has positively impacted your career growth?
11. How often do you communicate with your manager while remote working?
a) Daily b) Several times a week
c) Weekly d) Rarely
e) Never
12. How effective do you find the communication with your manager while remote
working?
a) Very effective b) Effective
c) Neutral d) Ineffective
e) Very ineffective

62
13. Has remote working affected your productivity positively or negatively?
a) Positively b) Negatively
c) No impact d) unsure
14. Do you feel remote working has provided you with a better work-life balance?
a) Strongly agree b) Agree
c) Neutral d) Disagree
e) Strongly disagree
15. How connected do you feel to your colleagues while remote working?
a) Very connected b) Connected
c) Neutral d) Disconnected
e) Very disconnected
16. Have you participated in any virtual team-building activities while remote working?
a) Yes, frequently b) Yes, occasionally
c) No, but I would like to d) No, I am not interested
17. How often do you receive feedback from your manager while remote working?
a) Weekly b) Bi-weekly
c) Monthly d) Rarely
e) Never
18. How valued do you feel as a remote employee within your organization?
a) Very valued b) Valued -
c) Neutral d) Undervalued
e) Very undervalued

63
19. Do you feel remote working has affected your job satisfaction?
a) Positively b) Negatively
c) No impact d) unsure
20. How often do you engage in informal interactions with your colleagues while remote
working?
a) Daily b) Several times a week
c) Weekly d) Rarely
e) Never
21. Have you encountered any challenges with technology/tools while remote working?
a) Yes, frequently b) Yes, occasionally
c) No. not at all
22. How effective are the virtual meetings you attend while remote working?
a) Very effective b) Effective
c) Neutral d) Ineffective
e) Very ineffective
23. How satisfied are you with the level of collaboration within your team while remote
working?
24. Have you received adequate training and resources to support remote working?
a) Yes b) No
c) Partially
25. How transparent do you feel your organization is regarding decisions and changes
while remote working?
a) Very transparent b) Transparent
c) Neutral d) Not very transparent
e) Not transparent at all

remote working final project (2).pdf project f

More Related Content

Similar to remote working final project (2).pdf project f (20)

More from RanvirSingh151 (6)

Recently uploaded (20)

remote working final project (2).pdf project f