Repairs vs. improvements_2021
0 likes14 views
This document discusses the distinction between repairs and improvements for tax purposes, noting that repairs are deductible in the year incurred while improvements must be capitalized and depreciated over time. It provides examples to illustrate these concepts and emphasizes the importance of proper classification for tax benefits. Additionally, it highlights the business-use requirement for deductions and the need for detailed recordkeeping.
Repairs vs. improvements_2021
- 1. Repairs vs. Improvements Repairs vs. Improvements Generally, a current business deduction is allowed for the cost of repairs and maintenance incurred during the year. On the other hand, the amounts paid to acquire, produce, or improve tangible property must be capitalized. Since re- pairs and improvements often have very similar character- istics, it can be tricky to classify the expenditures. Howev- er, correct classification is important because the cost of re- pairs can generally be deducted in the year paid, while im- provements must be capitalized and the deduction taken over several years through depreciation. An improvement requiring capitalization occurs with an addition to or partial replacement of property that results in a betterment of the unit of property, restores the unit of property, or adapts the unit of property to a new use. The cost of an improvement must be capitalized and depreci- ated over a certain number of years as if the improvement were separate property. Example: Nina has a truck she uses for her contracting business. Her truck was damaged and the cost to repair it is considered a deductible repair cost. Routine maintenance on the truck such as engine tune-ups and oil changes are also currently deductible ex- penses. Nina added a hydraulic lift to her truck, which improved its functionality.The expense of adding the lift is an improvement that must be capitalized and depreciated over the truck’s remain- ing useful life. Example: Glen owns a rental house and the roof on the unit is leaking. Glen is comparing the costs and benefits of fixing the leaking roof with replacing the entire roof. Glen can deduct the cost of repairing the leak as a rental repair expense. However, if Glen completely replaces the roof, the new roof is an improve- ment because it increases the value and lengthens the life of the property. Glen must capitalize and depreciate the cost of a new roof. Common Repairs vs. Improvements Repairs Improvements Costs that: • Keep the property in good operating condition. • Do not materially add value to the property. • Do not substantially prolong the property’s life. Costs that: • Improve or better the property. • Restore the property. • Adapt the property to new or different uses. Deductible as a current expense. Must be capitalized and depreciated.* Examples: • Repainting inside or out. • Fixing gutters. • Fixing damaged carpet. • Fixing leaks. • Plastering. • Replacing broken windows. • Servicing office equipment. • Cleaning and lubricating machinery. Examples: • Room additions. • Remodeling. • Landscaping. • New roof or flooring/carpeting. • Wiring upgrades. • New heating/cooling and plumbing systems. • Installing a security system. • Replacing gravel driveway with concrete. * The cost of an improvement is depreciated according to a prescribed class and recovery period of the underlying property. Most non-real estate assets such as computers or machinery are depreciated over five or seven years, with residential real estate depreciated over 27 ½ years, and nonresidential business property over 39 years. TAX YEAR 2021 Save $ And Experience The Difference +1-516-464-7444 info@cpaclinics.com www.cpaclinics.com
- 2. This brochure contains general information for taxpayers and should not be relied upon as the only source of authority. Taxpayers should seek professional tax advice for more information. Copyright © 2021 Tax Materials, Inc. All Rights Reserved Contact Us There are many events that occur during the year that can affect your tax situation. Preparation of your tax return involves sum- marizing transactions and events that occurred during the prior year. In most situations, treatment is firmly established at the time the transaction occurs. However, negative tax effects can be avoided by proper planning. Please contact us in advance if you have questions about the tax effects of a transaction or event, including the following: • Pension or IRA distributions. • Significant change in income or deductions. • Job change. • Marriage. • Attainment of age 59½ or 72. • Sale or purchase of a business. • Sale or purchase of a residence or other real estate. • Retirement. • Notice from IRS or other revenue department. • Divorce or separation. • Self-employment. • Charitable contributions of property in excess of $5,000. Repairs vs. Improvements Business Use Requirement Repairs are deductible only on business-use or rental property. A homeowner with no business use of the home does not benefit when an expenditure is classified as a re- pair rather than an improvement. Repairs are nondeduct- ible personal expenses, while an improvement increases the basis of the home and reduces any potential gain on the sale of the home. Example: Olive repaired a hole in the wall in her living room, replaced a few broken tiles in her bathroom, and sealed some cracks in her windows. She spent $1,200 making repairs to her home. Because Olive does not use her home for business purpos- es, the $1,200 is a personal expense and is not deductible. Recordkeeping Keep good records and ask contractors to provide an item- ized list showing repairs and separately stated improve- ments and costs. If repairs and improvements are all com- pleted at the same time, the IRS may classify the entire cost as improvement, even if some of the expenses were for repairs. Court Case: A taxpayer incurred expenses to add a lunch area, restrooms, and a loading and unloading ramp to his existing manufacturing plants. In addition, the interior of the plants were painted and‘fixed-up.’He claimed a repairs and maintenance deduction for all of the expenses.The IRS disallowed the deduction, explaining that the additions/ improvements were made under a proposal and were re- quired to be capitalized.The court agreed with the IRS, not- ing that the additions of the lunch room, restrooms and ramps constitute nondeductible capital expenditures that were more than merely keeping the property in an ordi- narily efficient operating condition. The additions and im- provements not only increased the value of the plants, but also aided in adapting them to a different use.The painting of the facility would qualify as a deductible repair if those expenses were standing alone, however, when made as part of an entire capital investment in the improved prop- erty, as they were in this case, they must be treated as a cap- ital expenditure. In addition, the court noted that it was not possible to determine from the evidence submitted what portion, if any, was attributable to deductible repairs.With- out a segregation of expenses, the deduction cannot be al- lowed and all expenditures must be capitalized. (Rutter,T.C. Memo 1986-407, August 28, 1986) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)