Resource Management, Pollution Prevention and Control, and Sustainability
updated 2023
3) Project Delivery (power point slides/oral presentation)
The final delivery will consist of a well-documented and professional set of slides
using a suitable presentation and delivery format (i.e., PowerPoint, etc). This
project requires that at least you use five (5) references (including at least two (2)
government citations), use government books, or websites. The use of more
references is always encouraged and will probably enhance your message and
information for the receiving audience. A maximum of two (2) website references
can be included as references in the Reference section of the paper. The
presentation slides and the oral delivery are due at class during week 8. Notice that
an oral delivery is not necessarily possible in the online format. Therefore, you
should work on writing a script that accompanies your presentation and explain
each of the slides. This script is what you should use if you were doing this
presentation in front the class and should explain the concepts or ideas presented.
Project Description
Research Project – Resource Management, Pollution Prevention and Control, and
Sustainability
The project involves the selection of a suitable environmental/sustainability
management topic. Students will be asked to properly describe the selected topic,
conduct a suitable research, write a draft manuscript and effectively turn the
gathered information into a PowerPoint slides presentation that could be used to
support an oral presentation.
The topic may be selected from a wide variety of sources ranging from an
environmental problem in any place in the world, real-world case studies, to the
use of
energy sources and alternative energy sources at a community. Students will select
one TOPIC and conduct preliminary research using the University library and local
libraries. A short list of topics is included below to assist you in the selection of
your topic. Subtopics are in parenthesis.
You can select one topic within the parenthesis, not all of them! Again, this list is
provided here to help you with the selection process. However, you may select
other related environmental topics, not necessarily included in the list.
– Overpopulation (i.e., country, region, or city, resources, distribution)
– Consumption and resource depletion
– Renewable energy (i.e., wind, solar, biomass, thermal, hydropower, tidal, etc.)
– Fossil fuel (gas, coal, or petroleum consumption, distribution)
– Nuclear energy (i.e., radioactive waste, Yucca Mountain, decommissioning, etc)
– Water as a Resource (i.e., surface or groundwater pollution, drinking water
sources, water conservation, industrial uses, water rights, global water problems,
watersheds, wastewater treatment methods, or community problems)
– Soil Preservation (i.e., soil erosion, nutrient depletion, world soil problems,
agricultural problems, soil pollution, crop rotation)
– Minerals (i.e., extraction, processing, depletion, or environmental problems)
– Wildlife Conservation (i.e., National parks, wetlands, suburban sprawl)
– Air Pollution (i.e., global pollution, urban air pollution, control equipment,
indoor air pollution)
– Noise Pollution (i.e., urban noise pollution, controlling noise)
– Pesticides (i.e., Uses, risks, laws, or environmental impacts)
– Solid and Hazardous Wastes (i.e., open dumps, sanitary landfills, incineration,
composting, recycling)
– Environmental Justice (i.e., low-income communities, poverty issues)
– Local environmental issues in your community (i.e., Maryland, Virginia, DC)
– Active Natural Resource Management
– Political Environmental Issues
– Environmental economics
The Project addresses outcome 2:
– apply scientific reasoning to recognize the connection between human population
growth, lifestyle choices, and environmental impacts
You may choose a topic from the provided list or propose a topic for approval.
To help you plan, organize, and write the content of your selected topic for the
project, you may follow the suggested stages shown below:
Stage 1: If you need to consult, you may contact your instructor to seek guidance
in the selection of your topic. You do need to submit your topic for approval, but
you are always welcome to consult ahead of time.
Stage 2: UMGC or public library research for information literacy
Stage 3: UMGC Effective Writing Center conference for submission of thesis
statement, outline, and introductory paragraph for critique
Stage 4: Finalize and submit your Outline for grading (week 3)
Stage 5: Submit of work to Turnitin.com and subsequent paraphrasing of verbatim
text
Stage 6: Submit final project for grading (end of course)
You will be expected to actively participate in all stages to gain an appreciation for
the expected content and coverage of the written assignment project.
You must select a topic that is relevant to environmental sustainability. Your topic
must address one of these phrases:
an environmental issue its causes, current state, and solutions the role of
economics, technology, or industry in your environmental issue the impact of the
environmental issue on ecosystems
Example of past topics:
Disappearing tropical rainforests (Explain what is happening. Why should we be
concerned?)
Compare and contrast China’s and India’s efforts at slowing their population
growth.
Report on the decline of honeybees. Why should we care? What difference will it
make to our lifestyle?
Explain Iceland’s plan to be the first country to run its economy on 100 percent
renewable energy.
Carbon trading (What is it? Why has it been established? How will it benefit the
Earth?)
Harmful algae blooms (HABs) (What are they? What causes them? Are they
harmful to humans?)
Global water scarcity (How bad is it? How is it linked to global crises and
conflict?)
You will be evaluated on:
content: clear and accurate knowledge of your topic and how your topic relates to
human impact on the environment with emphasis on sustainability and global
citizenship
references: proper quantity and quality of APA citations
effective writing: grammar, spelling, punctuation
following directions
Grading Rubric for the Project
Assessment: The grading weights for the four assessment areas are: directions (10
percent), scientific content (60 percent), scholarly references (15 percent), and
effective writing grammar, spelling, and punctuation (15 percent).
90-100 percent outstanding: Writing excels far above established university
standards. Marked by superior readability and competent handling of content.
Submission could be used as an example of outstanding work for other students to
emulate.
Directions: All general directions followed. No direction errors.
Content: Facts, organization, and conclusions follow a clear, logical sequence that
supports the thesis statement. Citations of scholarly references support scientific
content. Accurate scientific information. No text has been copied verbatim without
proper source recognition. Outstanding treatment of applicable course outcome.
References: All are properly cited using in-text and reference list citations.
Significantly more references used than required. Many different types (e.g.,
textbook, scientific articles, encyclopedia, reputable Internet reference, etc.) of
references are used.
Effective Writing: No errors. Words are chosen and sentences are constructed to
make the information understandable.
80-89 percent superior: Writing is above established university standards.
Characterized by distinguished writing but contains minor weaknesses.
Directions: Contains one direction error.
Content: Nearly all directions followed. Although the writing is essentially well
organized, the audience analysis, the statement of purpose, or the handling of the
content is flawed. Ambiguous or vague wording hinders precise communication.
Contains one to two science content errors. One to two statements (or significant
phrases) have been copied verbatim without proper source recognition. Superior
treatment of applicable course outcome.
References: Most are properly cited using in-text and reference list citations. Only
one to two minor citation errors. More references used than required. Several
different types of references are used.
Effective Writing: Contains one to two errors. Although sentences are
grammatically correct, their structure or length, or both, sometimes causes the
reader to work unnecessarily hard. Grammar, mechanics, and format flaws
interfere with reading and comprehension.
70-79 percent good: Writing meets established standards. Generally effective but
contains weaknesses.
Directions: Contains two direction errors.
Content: Although satisfactorily written, the body of the assignment is not clearly
organized, or some material is not clearly explained. The audience and purpose are
not clear. Wording interferes with readability, but the reader can still glean the
meaning; rereading is often required. Contains three to four science content errors.
Reasoning is sound. Arguments are supported with adequate evidence. Three to
four statements (or significant phrases) have been copied verbatim without proper
source recognition. Good treatment of applicable course outcome.
References: Most are properly cited using in-text and reference list citations.
Contains three to four minor citation errors. Quantity of references meets required
number. Meets reference types required.
Effective Writing: Repeated grammar, mechanics, or format errors mar the paper.
Contains three to four errors.
More detailed information on the standards for a C paper is listed in paragraph 2.
60-69 percent substandard: Writing is below established standards. Paper struggles
to communicate information and contains weak writing. In a professional working
environment, such writing would be considered incompetent.
Directions: Contains three to four direction errors.
Content: Unsatisfactory or incorrect content. Serious wording problems, such as
garbled wording, give the reader repeated and serious difficulties in understanding.
More than four science content errors. Content is largely unsupported generalities.
Points are inadequately developed; few specifics. Poorly organized; difficult to
follow. Overdependence on one or two references; inadequate in-text citations.
Four to six statements (or significant phrases) have been copied verbatim without
proper source recognition. Inadequate treatment of applicable course outcome.
References: Most are improperly cited with more than four citation errors. Does
not meet reference types required.
Effective Writing: Serious sentence problems such as run-on sentences, fused
sentences, and comma splices, damage the work’s readability. Contains five to
eight errors; errors distract the reader. Problems create frequent obstacles to
understanding.
0-59 percentfailure: Writing does not meet minimum standards and/or the student
has committed plagiarism by submitting another person’s words or ideas as if they
were the student’s words or ideas. Failure to reference correctly. In a professional
working environment, such writing would be considered incompetent.
Directions: More than four direction errors.
Content: Unsatisfactory or incorrect content. Many content errors; content is
largely unsupported generalities. Points are inadequately developed; few specifics.
Poorly organized; difficult to follow. Does not meet minimum length requirements.
Substantial text (e.g., more than six statements or significant phrases) has been
copied verbatim without proper source recognition. Significant overdependence on
one to two references. Did not satisfy applicable course outcome.
References: Most are improperly cited with more than four citation errors.
Quantity of references does not meet required number. Does not meet reference
types required; failure to use in-text APA citations.
Effective Writing: Contains more than eight errors (9-10: 55%; 11-12: 45%; 13-14:
35%; 15-16: 25%; 17-18: 15%; 19-20: 5%; more than 20: 0%; percentages are
based on a five-page paper). Many serious errors significantly distract the reader
from the content. Language is used inaccurately.
Order an assignment through this link: https://intel-writers.com/

More Related Content

DOCX
INTS 210 Sustainable World Wingfield Fall, 2016 So.docx
DOCX
Final Paper InstructionsPurposeThis assignment will address th
DOCX
Advanced food microbiology fnh 8113fall 2021assignmentas
DOCX
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION2MichaelScarcity theory-States tha.docx
DOCX
My topic that I chose is The writing assignment topic that I .docx
DOCX
Discussion question 1Prepare Prior to beginning work on this as
PDF
Sci 256 sci256
DOC
Ess student course guide
INTS 210 Sustainable World Wingfield Fall, 2016 So.docx
Final Paper InstructionsPurposeThis assignment will address th
Advanced food microbiology fnh 8113fall 2021assignmentas
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION2MichaelScarcity theory-States tha.docx
My topic that I chose is The writing assignment topic that I .docx
Discussion question 1Prepare Prior to beginning work on this as
Sci 256 sci256
Ess student course guide

More from intel-writers.com (20)

DOCX
Discus the Cultural Trends and Their Expression [ updated 2023].docx
DOCX
Explain the Nursing Role in Data Collection Process [ updated 2023}.docx
DOCX
Explain the Goals and Objectives of the Health Promotion Plan {updated 2023}....
DOCX
Compare and contrast poverty and diversity in America [updated 2023}.docx
DOCX
Exploring the Relevance of Shakespeare’s Works in the Modern World [updated 2...
DOCX
Discus the best Communication in Conflict Resolution {updated 2023].docx
DOCX
Explain Key Reasons to Evaluate Vulnerability [ updated 2023].docx
DOCX
Discus the best Interviewing skills [ updated 2023].docx
DOCX
Explain what other Asian character types now seem to be common [ updated 2023...
DOCX
what are the hegemonic?[ updated 2023]
DOCX
intel17.docx
DOCX
Discus the Internal Consultant to generate the organization analysis {updated...
DOCX
The best Evaluation of training {updated 2023].docx
DOCX
Explain how national monarchs were able to increase their control over their ...
DOCX
Discus the Account for Disney’s management {updated 2023}.docx
DOCX
Explain the major IT system component [ updated 2023].docx
DOCX
Critically evaluate anthropological perspectives of community leadership, [up...
DOCX
Whale stocks negatively impacted on marine production {updated 2023].docx
DOCX
Discus the nurse’s roles in the management of diabetic foot ulcers [ updated ...
DOCX
Write an essay to Create characters that break stereotypes of American Indian...
Discus the Cultural Trends and Their Expression [ updated 2023].docx
Explain the Nursing Role in Data Collection Process [ updated 2023}.docx
Explain the Goals and Objectives of the Health Promotion Plan {updated 2023}....
Compare and contrast poverty and diversity in America [updated 2023}.docx
Exploring the Relevance of Shakespeare’s Works in the Modern World [updated 2...
Discus the best Communication in Conflict Resolution {updated 2023].docx
Explain Key Reasons to Evaluate Vulnerability [ updated 2023].docx
Discus the best Interviewing skills [ updated 2023].docx
Explain what other Asian character types now seem to be common [ updated 2023...
what are the hegemonic?[ updated 2023]
intel17.docx
Discus the Internal Consultant to generate the organization analysis {updated...
The best Evaluation of training {updated 2023].docx
Explain how national monarchs were able to increase their control over their ...
Discus the Account for Disney’s management {updated 2023}.docx
Explain the major IT system component [ updated 2023].docx
Critically evaluate anthropological perspectives of community leadership, [up...
Whale stocks negatively impacted on marine production {updated 2023].docx
Discus the nurse’s roles in the management of diabetic foot ulcers [ updated ...
Write an essay to Create characters that break stereotypes of American Indian...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
102602734019608717246081273460745534.pptx
PPTX
Microbial-Pathogens-and-Parasites-Their-Impact-on-Plant-Health.pptx
PDF
Cave Diggers Simplified cave survey methods and mapping
PPTX
Pollution, it's Types and Impacts on Global context.pptx
PPT
MATERI - LABORATORY - SAFETY.ppt
PPTX
Climate_Change_Renewable_and_Energy.pptx
PPTX
he document discusses solid waste management. It defines different types of s...
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Biogas Tanks Securely store produced biogas.docx
PPTX
IMPACTS OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS -CHEMPROJ (11).pptx
PPTX
Lecture-05-Audio-lingual. Method & Appro
PDF
1748933543SJA_41_2_826-834 SJA Ihsan ullha.pdf
DOCX
The Ripple Effect: Understanding Extreme Weather Patterns and Geomagnetic Dyn...
PDF
Lesson_1_Readings.pdfjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
PDF
FMM Slides For OSH Management Requirement
PDF
The European Green Deal (EU Green Deal)
PPTX
Environmental pollutants for natural res
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Biomethane Storage Holds upgraded biomethane fuel.docx
PPTX
Corporate Social Responsibility & Governance
PPTX
Biodiversity of nature in environmental studies.pptx
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Digester Tank Wastewater Treatment Integral to biog...
102602734019608717246081273460745534.pptx
Microbial-Pathogens-and-Parasites-Their-Impact-on-Plant-Health.pptx
Cave Diggers Simplified cave survey methods and mapping
Pollution, it's Types and Impacts on Global context.pptx
MATERI - LABORATORY - SAFETY.ppt
Climate_Change_Renewable_and_Energy.pptx
he document discusses solid waste management. It defines different types of s...
Double Membrane Roofs for Biogas Tanks Securely store produced biogas.docx
IMPACTS OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS -CHEMPROJ (11).pptx
Lecture-05-Audio-lingual. Method & Appro
1748933543SJA_41_2_826-834 SJA Ihsan ullha.pdf
The Ripple Effect: Understanding Extreme Weather Patterns and Geomagnetic Dyn...
Lesson_1_Readings.pdfjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
FMM Slides For OSH Management Requirement
The European Green Deal (EU Green Deal)
Environmental pollutants for natural res
Double Membrane Roofs for Biomethane Storage Holds upgraded biomethane fuel.docx
Corporate Social Responsibility & Governance
Biodiversity of nature in environmental studies.pptx
Double Membrane Roofs for Digester Tank Wastewater Treatment Integral to biog...

Resource Management document 10.docx

  • 1. Resource Management, Pollution Prevention and Control, and Sustainability updated 2023 3) Project Delivery (power point slides/oral presentation) The final delivery will consist of a well-documented and professional set of slides using a suitable presentation and delivery format (i.e., PowerPoint, etc). This project requires that at least you use five (5) references (including at least two (2) government citations), use government books, or websites. The use of more references is always encouraged and will probably enhance your message and information for the receiving audience. A maximum of two (2) website references can be included as references in the Reference section of the paper. The presentation slides and the oral delivery are due at class during week 8. Notice that an oral delivery is not necessarily possible in the online format. Therefore, you should work on writing a script that accompanies your presentation and explain each of the slides. This script is what you should use if you were doing this presentation in front the class and should explain the concepts or ideas presented. Project Description Research Project – Resource Management, Pollution Prevention and Control, and Sustainability The project involves the selection of a suitable environmental/sustainability management topic. Students will be asked to properly describe the selected topic,
  • 2. conduct a suitable research, write a draft manuscript and effectively turn the gathered information into a PowerPoint slides presentation that could be used to support an oral presentation. The topic may be selected from a wide variety of sources ranging from an environmental problem in any place in the world, real-world case studies, to the use of energy sources and alternative energy sources at a community. Students will select one TOPIC and conduct preliminary research using the University library and local libraries. A short list of topics is included below to assist you in the selection of your topic. Subtopics are in parenthesis. You can select one topic within the parenthesis, not all of them! Again, this list is provided here to help you with the selection process. However, you may select other related environmental topics, not necessarily included in the list. – Overpopulation (i.e., country, region, or city, resources, distribution) – Consumption and resource depletion – Renewable energy (i.e., wind, solar, biomass, thermal, hydropower, tidal, etc.) – Fossil fuel (gas, coal, or petroleum consumption, distribution) – Nuclear energy (i.e., radioactive waste, Yucca Mountain, decommissioning, etc)
  • 3. – Water as a Resource (i.e., surface or groundwater pollution, drinking water sources, water conservation, industrial uses, water rights, global water problems, watersheds, wastewater treatment methods, or community problems) – Soil Preservation (i.e., soil erosion, nutrient depletion, world soil problems, agricultural problems, soil pollution, crop rotation) – Minerals (i.e., extraction, processing, depletion, or environmental problems) – Wildlife Conservation (i.e., National parks, wetlands, suburban sprawl) – Air Pollution (i.e., global pollution, urban air pollution, control equipment, indoor air pollution) – Noise Pollution (i.e., urban noise pollution, controlling noise) – Pesticides (i.e., Uses, risks, laws, or environmental impacts) – Solid and Hazardous Wastes (i.e., open dumps, sanitary landfills, incineration, composting, recycling) – Environmental Justice (i.e., low-income communities, poverty issues) – Local environmental issues in your community (i.e., Maryland, Virginia, DC) – Active Natural Resource Management – Political Environmental Issues – Environmental economics The Project addresses outcome 2:
  • 4. – apply scientific reasoning to recognize the connection between human population growth, lifestyle choices, and environmental impacts You may choose a topic from the provided list or propose a topic for approval. To help you plan, organize, and write the content of your selected topic for the project, you may follow the suggested stages shown below: Stage 1: If you need to consult, you may contact your instructor to seek guidance in the selection of your topic. You do need to submit your topic for approval, but you are always welcome to consult ahead of time. Stage 2: UMGC or public library research for information literacy Stage 3: UMGC Effective Writing Center conference for submission of thesis statement, outline, and introductory paragraph for critique Stage 4: Finalize and submit your Outline for grading (week 3) Stage 5: Submit of work to Turnitin.com and subsequent paraphrasing of verbatim text Stage 6: Submit final project for grading (end of course) You will be expected to actively participate in all stages to gain an appreciation for the expected content and coverage of the written assignment project. You must select a topic that is relevant to environmental sustainability. Your topic must address one of these phrases:
  • 5. an environmental issue its causes, current state, and solutions the role of economics, technology, or industry in your environmental issue the impact of the environmental issue on ecosystems Example of past topics: Disappearing tropical rainforests (Explain what is happening. Why should we be concerned?) Compare and contrast China’s and India’s efforts at slowing their population growth. Report on the decline of honeybees. Why should we care? What difference will it make to our lifestyle? Explain Iceland’s plan to be the first country to run its economy on 100 percent renewable energy. Carbon trading (What is it? Why has it been established? How will it benefit the Earth?) Harmful algae blooms (HABs) (What are they? What causes them? Are they harmful to humans?) Global water scarcity (How bad is it? How is it linked to global crises and conflict?) You will be evaluated on:
  • 6. content: clear and accurate knowledge of your topic and how your topic relates to human impact on the environment with emphasis on sustainability and global citizenship references: proper quantity and quality of APA citations effective writing: grammar, spelling, punctuation following directions Grading Rubric for the Project Assessment: The grading weights for the four assessment areas are: directions (10 percent), scientific content (60 percent), scholarly references (15 percent), and effective writing grammar, spelling, and punctuation (15 percent). 90-100 percent outstanding: Writing excels far above established university standards. Marked by superior readability and competent handling of content. Submission could be used as an example of outstanding work for other students to emulate. Directions: All general directions followed. No direction errors. Content: Facts, organization, and conclusions follow a clear, logical sequence that supports the thesis statement. Citations of scholarly references support scientific content. Accurate scientific information. No text has been copied verbatim without proper source recognition. Outstanding treatment of applicable course outcome.
  • 7. References: All are properly cited using in-text and reference list citations. Significantly more references used than required. Many different types (e.g., textbook, scientific articles, encyclopedia, reputable Internet reference, etc.) of references are used. Effective Writing: No errors. Words are chosen and sentences are constructed to make the information understandable. 80-89 percent superior: Writing is above established university standards. Characterized by distinguished writing but contains minor weaknesses. Directions: Contains one direction error. Content: Nearly all directions followed. Although the writing is essentially well organized, the audience analysis, the statement of purpose, or the handling of the content is flawed. Ambiguous or vague wording hinders precise communication. Contains one to two science content errors. One to two statements (or significant phrases) have been copied verbatim without proper source recognition. Superior treatment of applicable course outcome. References: Most are properly cited using in-text and reference list citations. Only one to two minor citation errors. More references used than required. Several different types of references are used. Effective Writing: Contains one to two errors. Although sentences are grammatically correct, their structure or length, or both, sometimes causes the
  • 8. reader to work unnecessarily hard. Grammar, mechanics, and format flaws interfere with reading and comprehension. 70-79 percent good: Writing meets established standards. Generally effective but contains weaknesses. Directions: Contains two direction errors. Content: Although satisfactorily written, the body of the assignment is not clearly organized, or some material is not clearly explained. The audience and purpose are not clear. Wording interferes with readability, but the reader can still glean the meaning; rereading is often required. Contains three to four science content errors. Reasoning is sound. Arguments are supported with adequate evidence. Three to four statements (or significant phrases) have been copied verbatim without proper source recognition. Good treatment of applicable course outcome. References: Most are properly cited using in-text and reference list citations. Contains three to four minor citation errors. Quantity of references meets required number. Meets reference types required. Effective Writing: Repeated grammar, mechanics, or format errors mar the paper. Contains three to four errors. More detailed information on the standards for a C paper is listed in paragraph 2.
  • 9. 60-69 percent substandard: Writing is below established standards. Paper struggles to communicate information and contains weak writing. In a professional working environment, such writing would be considered incompetent. Directions: Contains three to four direction errors. Content: Unsatisfactory or incorrect content. Serious wording problems, such as garbled wording, give the reader repeated and serious difficulties in understanding. More than four science content errors. Content is largely unsupported generalities. Points are inadequately developed; few specifics. Poorly organized; difficult to follow. Overdependence on one or two references; inadequate in-text citations. Four to six statements (or significant phrases) have been copied verbatim without proper source recognition. Inadequate treatment of applicable course outcome. References: Most are improperly cited with more than four citation errors. Does not meet reference types required. Effective Writing: Serious sentence problems such as run-on sentences, fused sentences, and comma splices, damage the work’s readability. Contains five to eight errors; errors distract the reader. Problems create frequent obstacles to understanding. 0-59 percentfailure: Writing does not meet minimum standards and/or the student has committed plagiarism by submitting another person’s words or ideas as if they
  • 10. were the student’s words or ideas. Failure to reference correctly. In a professional working environment, such writing would be considered incompetent. Directions: More than four direction errors. Content: Unsatisfactory or incorrect content. Many content errors; content is largely unsupported generalities. Points are inadequately developed; few specifics. Poorly organized; difficult to follow. Does not meet minimum length requirements. Substantial text (e.g., more than six statements or significant phrases) has been copied verbatim without proper source recognition. Significant overdependence on one to two references. Did not satisfy applicable course outcome. References: Most are improperly cited with more than four citation errors. Quantity of references does not meet required number. Does not meet reference types required; failure to use in-text APA citations. Effective Writing: Contains more than eight errors (9-10: 55%; 11-12: 45%; 13-14: 35%; 15-16: 25%; 17-18: 15%; 19-20: 5%; more than 20: 0%; percentages are based on a five-page paper). Many serious errors significantly distract the reader from the content. Language is used inaccurately. Order an assignment through this link: https://intel-writers.com/