![International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computers (EEC Journal) [Vol-3, Issue-2, Mar-Apr 2018]
ISSN: 2456-2319
www.eecjournal.com Page | 18
Review on AES Algorithm Based Secure Data
Transmission for Wireless Sensor Network
Chanderkant Sharma1
, Saurabh Anand2
1
B.Tech Final Year Student, Information Technology Department, Poornima College of Engineering, Jaipur, India
2014pceitchanderkant@poornima.org
2
Assistant. Professor, Information Technology Department, Poornima College of Engineering, Jaipur, India
Saurabhanand@poornima.org
Abstract— Due to vast development of information
technology the need of the protection of data also increases
for that purpose encryption is done. The security
requirements include four major aspect data confidentiality,
data integrity, data authentication and data freshness.
WSNs have produced enormous enthusiasm among analysts
these years in view of their potential utilization in a wide
assortment of uses. Sensor hubs are cheap compact gadgets
with restricted handling force and vitality assets. Sensor
hubs can be utilized to gather data from the earth, locally
process this information and transmit the detected
information back to the client. For securing that data from
attack many algorithms came in existence for cryptography
purpose. Be that as it may, the outstanding amongst other
existing symmetric security calculation to give information
security utilized these days is Advanced encryption standard
(AES).
Keywords— AES, DES, Encryption, Cryptography, Key
Expansion, cipher text, WSN.
I. INTRODUCTION:
Wireless sensor networks (WSN) consists of autonomous
sensor nodes attached to one or base stations. One of the
main goals of wireless sensor networks is to carry reliable
information from one node to another node in a network. As
Wireless sensor systems keeps on developing, they wind up
powerless against attacks and thus the requirement for
effective security components. ID of reasonable
cryptography for remote sensor systems is an imperative
test because of limitation of energy, computation capability
and storage resources of the sensor nodes. In this paper we
have implemented Encryption algorithm AES (Advanced
Encryption Standard) to provide sufficient levels of security
for WSN. Advanced encryption standard has favorable
position of being actualized on both hardware and software.
Advanced encryption standard depends on "substitution-
permutation network". It uses 10, 12, or 14 rounds in
algorithm and the key size, can be 128, 192, or 256 bits
depending on the number of rounds. The AES is widely
used to encrypt the confidential data for security purposes.
1.1 AUTHENTICATION: The process of proving one's
identity. It is another part of data security that we encounter
with everyday computer usage. Just think when you log into
your email, or blog account. The simple sign-in process is a
form of authentication that allows you to log into
applications, files, folders and even an entire computer
system. Once signed in, you have different given benefits
until the point when logging out. Some system will cancel a
session if your machine has been idle for a certain amount
of time, requiring that you prove authentication once again
to re-enter. The straightforward sign-on plot is likewise
executed into solid client authentication systems. Be that as
it may, it expects people to login utilizing various
components of authentication. Non-repudiation: In this, the
recipient should know whether the sender isn't faking.For
example, if suppose when one purchases something online,
one should be sure that the person whom one pays is not
faking.
1.2 INTEGRITY: Many a times information should be
refreshed yet this must be finished by authenticated people.
1.3 Privacy/confidentiality: Ensuring that nobody can read
the message aside from the expected receiver. Encryption is
the way toward clouding data to make it mixed up without
extraordinary learning. Encryption has been utilized to
ensure correspondences for a considerable length of time,
however just associations and people with an uncommon
requirement for mystery had made utilization of it. In the
mid-1970s, in number encryption rose up out of the sole
safeguard of cryptic government organizations into people
in general space, and is presently utilized as a part of
securing broadly utilized frameworks, for example, Internet](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/5reviewonaesalgorithmbased-180519171239/85/Review-on-AES-Algorithm-Based-Secure-Data-Transmission-for-Wireless-Sensor-Network-1-320.jpg)
![International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computers (EEC Journal) [Vol-3, Issue-2, Mar-Apr 2018]
ISSN: 2456-2319
www.eecjournal.com Page | 19
online business, cell phone systems and bank programmed
teller machines.
II. AES ALGORITHM
NIST started its push to build up the AES, a symmetric key
encryption algorithm, and made an overall open require the
calculation to succeed DES. At first 15 algorithms were
chosen, which was then decreased down to 4 algorithms,
RC6, Rijndael, Serpent and Two-angle, which were all
iterated square figures. The four finalists were altogether
resolved to be qualified as the AES. The calculation must be
reasonable over an extensive variety of hardware and
software systems. The calculation must be moderately basic
also. After broad audit the Rijndael calculation was been the
AES calculation.
Difference between AES and DES
Factors DES AES
Key Length 56 bits 128, 192, 256
bits
Block Size 64 bits 128, 192, 256
bits
Cipher
Text
Symmetric
block cipher
Symmetric
block cipher
Developed 1977 2000
Security Proven
inadequate
Considered
secure
Possible
Keys
256 2128, 2192,
2256
2.1 THE RIJNDAEL ALGORITHM:
For Rijndael, the length of both the square to be encoded
and the encryption key are not settled. They can be
autonomously indicated to 128, 192 or 256 bits. The
quantity of rounds, nonetheless, differs as indicated by the
key length. It can be equivalent to 10, 12 and 14 when the
key length is 128bits, 192 bits and 256 bits, individually.
The fundamental parts of Rijndael are basic scientific,
legitimate, and table query tasks. The last is really a
composite capacity of a reversal over Galois Field (GF)
with a relative mapping. Such structure makes Rijndael
appropriate for equipment execution.
III. WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK:
In a typical WSN we see following network components –
Sensor motes (Field devices) – Field devices are mounted in
the process and must be capable of routing packets on
behalf of other devices. In most cases they characterize or
control the process or process equipment. A router is a
special type of field device that does not have process
sensor or control equipment and as such does not interface
with the process itself.
Gateway or Access points – A Gateway enables
communication between Host application and field devices.
Network manager – A Network Manager is responsible for
configuration of the network, scheduling communication
between devices (i.e., configuring super frames),
management of the routing tables and monitoring and
reporting the health of the network.
Security manager – The Security Manager is responsible for
the generation, storage, and management of keys[5,18,19].
IV. WSN SECURITY ANALYSIS
Effortlessness in Wireless Sensor Network with asset
obliged hubs makes them greatly defenseless against
assortment of assaults. Aggressors can listen in on our radio
transmissions, infuse bits in the channel, replay already
heard bundles and some more. Securing the Remote Sensor
Network needs to make the system bolster all security
properties: privacy, uprightness, credibility and
accessibility. Aggressors may send a scarcely any
malevolent hubs with comparable equipment abilities as the
honest to goodness hubs that may conspire to assault the
framework helpfully. The aggressor may happen upon these
malevolent hubs by buying them independently, or by
"turning" a couple of honest to goodness hubs by catching
them furthermore, physically overwriting their memory.
Likewise, in a few cases plotting hubs may have high
caliber
interchanges joins accessible for planning their assault.
Sensor center points may not be change safe and if a foe
deals a center point, she can remove all key material, data,
and code set away on that center point. While change
security might be a viable obstruction for physical node
bargain for a few systems, we don't see it as a broadly](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/5reviewonaesalgorithmbased-180519171239/85/Review-on-AES-Algorithm-Based-Secure-Data-Transmission-for-Wireless-Sensor-Network-2-320.jpg)
![International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computers (EEC Journal) [Vol-3, Issue-2, Mar-Apr 2018]
ISSN: 2456-2319
www.eecjournal.com Page | 20
useful arrangement. To a great degree compelling alter
protection tends to include critical per-unit cost, also, sensor
hubs are proposed to be exceptionally economical.
4.1 AES (RIJNDAEL) OVERVIEW
Rijndael (articulated as in "rain doll" or "rhine dahl") is a
piece figure outlined by Joan Daemen and Vincent Rijmen,
the two cryptographers in Belgium. Rijndael can work over
a variable-length piece utilizing variablelength keys; the
adaptation 2 particular submitted to NIST portrays
utilization of a 128-, 192-, or 256-piece key to scramble
information obstructs that are 128, 192, or 256 bits in
length; take note of that each of the nine mixes of key
length and square length are conceivable. The calculation is
composed in such a way that piece length or potentially key
length can without much of a stretch be reached out in
products of 32 bits and it is particularlyintended for
proficient execution in equipment or programming on a
scope of processors. The outline of Rijndael was
unequivocally impacted by the piece figure.
V. METHODOLOGY
Data encryption is an imperative part of applying security to
a wireless sensor systems. Despite the fact that transmission
of information is the most energy consuming action in a
remote sensor hub, it is likewise essential to choose a
energy effective figure to limit energy utilization of the
sensor hub. Subsequently symmetric key figure is
commonly used to scramble information for transmission.
Numerous block ciphers, for example, Advanced
Encryption Standard (AES) utilizes various rounds of
activities, for example, substitutions and linear
transformations.
Secured Power Aware Routing For Wireless Sensor
Security is an important factor for performance and energy
efficiency in many applications. Security serves as an
important role in war zone, premise protection surveillance,
airports, hospitals etc. Because of the property of sensor
devices, the sensor systems may effortlessly be
compromised by attackers who send manufactured or
altered messages. To keep data and communication systems
from unlawful delivery and modification, message
verification and distinguishing proof should be analyzed
through certificated mechanisms. The messages transmitted
from the sensor hubs over a remote sensor systems ought to
be verified by the collector. The strategy of cryptography is
used for this part. It is a test for the researchers to find
proper cryptography for remote sensor orchestrates on
account of the limitations in control efficiency, computation
capability and awesome stockpiling capacities.
VI. CONCLUSION
The proposed convention has been actualized utilizing
Network Simulator (NS2). The execution measurements
depends on control utilization, bundle conveyance
proportion. The AES Based Secure Transmission in
Wireless Sensor Networks accomplishes the application
determined correspondence delays at low vitality cost by
powerfully adjusting transmission control and directing
choices alongside consolidating a novel cryptosystem for
security. To keep data and correspondence frameworks
from unlawful conveyance and alteration, message
confirmation and ID is inspected through guaranteed
instruments. The messages transmitted from the sensor hubs
over a remote sensor systems is validated by the
beneficiary. The method of cryptography is utilized for this
system. The sender utilizes the proposed encryption
calculation to make an impression on the beneficiary,
through unsecured channel, and the collector utilizes the
proposed unscrambling calculation to peruse the got
message. The novel cryptosystem based Secured Power
Aware Routing Protocol (SPARP) upgrades Quality of
Service (QoS, for example, parcel conveyance proportion,
delay and diminishes the power utilization between the hubs
when bundles are transmitted.
REFERENCES
[1] R. Prema and R. Rangarajan, “Secured Power Aware
Routing Protocol (SPARP) for Wireless Sensor
Networks”, International Journal of Computer
Applications, August 2012, Volume 51, No.7, pp.13-
18.
[2] R. Prema and R. Rangarajan, “Secured Power Aware
and Energy Efficient Routing Protocol(SPAEERP) For
Wireless Sensor Networks”, International Journal of
Electronics and Communication Engineering”,
International Academy of Science, Engineering and
Technology, Volume 2, Issue 1, February 2013, pp.7-
18.
[3] Nikolaos A. Pantazis, StefaNos A. Nikolidakis and
Dimitrios D. Vergados, “Energy Efficient Routing
Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey,”
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Second
Quarter 2013, Vol. 15, No.2, pp. 551-589.
[4] S.K. Singh, M.P. Singh, and D.K. Singh, “A Survey of
Energy Efficient Hierarchical Cluster-based Routing
in Wireless Sensor Networks,” International Journal of
Advanced Networking and Application (IJANA),
2010, Vol. 02, issue 02, pp. 570–580.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/5reviewonaesalgorithmbased-180519171239/85/Review-on-AES-Algorithm-Based-Secure-Data-Transmission-for-Wireless-Sensor-Network-3-320.jpg)
Review on AES Algorithm Based Secure Data Transmission for Wireless Sensor Network
- 1. International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computers (EEC Journal) [Vol-3, Issue-2, Mar-Apr 2018] ISSN: 2456-2319 www.eecjournal.com Page | 18 Review on AES Algorithm Based Secure Data Transmission for Wireless Sensor Network Chanderkant Sharma1 , Saurabh Anand2 1 B.Tech Final Year Student, Information Technology Department, Poornima College of Engineering, Jaipur, India 2014pceitchanderkant@poornima.org 2 Assistant. Professor, Information Technology Department, Poornima College of Engineering, Jaipur, India Saurabhanand@poornima.org Abstract— Due to vast development of information technology the need of the protection of data also increases for that purpose encryption is done. The security requirements include four major aspect data confidentiality, data integrity, data authentication and data freshness. WSNs have produced enormous enthusiasm among analysts these years in view of their potential utilization in a wide assortment of uses. Sensor hubs are cheap compact gadgets with restricted handling force and vitality assets. Sensor hubs can be utilized to gather data from the earth, locally process this information and transmit the detected information back to the client. For securing that data from attack many algorithms came in existence for cryptography purpose. Be that as it may, the outstanding amongst other existing symmetric security calculation to give information security utilized these days is Advanced encryption standard (AES). Keywords— AES, DES, Encryption, Cryptography, Key Expansion, cipher text, WSN. I. INTRODUCTION: Wireless sensor networks (WSN) consists of autonomous sensor nodes attached to one or base stations. One of the main goals of wireless sensor networks is to carry reliable information from one node to another node in a network. As Wireless sensor systems keeps on developing, they wind up powerless against attacks and thus the requirement for effective security components. ID of reasonable cryptography for remote sensor systems is an imperative test because of limitation of energy, computation capability and storage resources of the sensor nodes. In this paper we have implemented Encryption algorithm AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) to provide sufficient levels of security for WSN. Advanced encryption standard has favorable position of being actualized on both hardware and software. Advanced encryption standard depends on "substitution- permutation network". It uses 10, 12, or 14 rounds in algorithm and the key size, can be 128, 192, or 256 bits depending on the number of rounds. The AES is widely used to encrypt the confidential data for security purposes. 1.1 AUTHENTICATION: The process of proving one's identity. It is another part of data security that we encounter with everyday computer usage. Just think when you log into your email, or blog account. The simple sign-in process is a form of authentication that allows you to log into applications, files, folders and even an entire computer system. Once signed in, you have different given benefits until the point when logging out. Some system will cancel a session if your machine has been idle for a certain amount of time, requiring that you prove authentication once again to re-enter. The straightforward sign-on plot is likewise executed into solid client authentication systems. Be that as it may, it expects people to login utilizing various components of authentication. Non-repudiation: In this, the recipient should know whether the sender isn't faking.For example, if suppose when one purchases something online, one should be sure that the person whom one pays is not faking. 1.2 INTEGRITY: Many a times information should be refreshed yet this must be finished by authenticated people. 1.3 Privacy/confidentiality: Ensuring that nobody can read the message aside from the expected receiver. Encryption is the way toward clouding data to make it mixed up without extraordinary learning. Encryption has been utilized to ensure correspondences for a considerable length of time, however just associations and people with an uncommon requirement for mystery had made utilization of it. In the mid-1970s, in number encryption rose up out of the sole safeguard of cryptic government organizations into people in general space, and is presently utilized as a part of securing broadly utilized frameworks, for example, Internet
- 2. International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computers (EEC Journal) [Vol-3, Issue-2, Mar-Apr 2018] ISSN: 2456-2319 www.eecjournal.com Page | 19 online business, cell phone systems and bank programmed teller machines. II. AES ALGORITHM NIST started its push to build up the AES, a symmetric key encryption algorithm, and made an overall open require the calculation to succeed DES. At first 15 algorithms were chosen, which was then decreased down to 4 algorithms, RC6, Rijndael, Serpent and Two-angle, which were all iterated square figures. The four finalists were altogether resolved to be qualified as the AES. The calculation must be reasonable over an extensive variety of hardware and software systems. The calculation must be moderately basic also. After broad audit the Rijndael calculation was been the AES calculation. Difference between AES and DES Factors DES AES Key Length 56 bits 128, 192, 256 bits Block Size 64 bits 128, 192, 256 bits Cipher Text Symmetric block cipher Symmetric block cipher Developed 1977 2000 Security Proven inadequate Considered secure Possible Keys 256 2128, 2192, 2256 2.1 THE RIJNDAEL ALGORITHM: For Rijndael, the length of both the square to be encoded and the encryption key are not settled. They can be autonomously indicated to 128, 192 or 256 bits. The quantity of rounds, nonetheless, differs as indicated by the key length. It can be equivalent to 10, 12 and 14 when the key length is 128bits, 192 bits and 256 bits, individually. The fundamental parts of Rijndael are basic scientific, legitimate, and table query tasks. The last is really a composite capacity of a reversal over Galois Field (GF) with a relative mapping. Such structure makes Rijndael appropriate for equipment execution. III. WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK: In a typical WSN we see following network components – Sensor motes (Field devices) – Field devices are mounted in the process and must be capable of routing packets on behalf of other devices. In most cases they characterize or control the process or process equipment. A router is a special type of field device that does not have process sensor or control equipment and as such does not interface with the process itself. Gateway or Access points – A Gateway enables communication between Host application and field devices. Network manager – A Network Manager is responsible for configuration of the network, scheduling communication between devices (i.e., configuring super frames), management of the routing tables and monitoring and reporting the health of the network. Security manager – The Security Manager is responsible for the generation, storage, and management of keys[5,18,19]. IV. WSN SECURITY ANALYSIS Effortlessness in Wireless Sensor Network with asset obliged hubs makes them greatly defenseless against assortment of assaults. Aggressors can listen in on our radio transmissions, infuse bits in the channel, replay already heard bundles and some more. Securing the Remote Sensor Network needs to make the system bolster all security properties: privacy, uprightness, credibility and accessibility. Aggressors may send a scarcely any malevolent hubs with comparable equipment abilities as the honest to goodness hubs that may conspire to assault the framework helpfully. The aggressor may happen upon these malevolent hubs by buying them independently, or by "turning" a couple of honest to goodness hubs by catching them furthermore, physically overwriting their memory. Likewise, in a few cases plotting hubs may have high caliber interchanges joins accessible for planning their assault. Sensor center points may not be change safe and if a foe deals a center point, she can remove all key material, data, and code set away on that center point. While change security might be a viable obstruction for physical node bargain for a few systems, we don't see it as a broadly
- 3. International Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Computers (EEC Journal) [Vol-3, Issue-2, Mar-Apr 2018] ISSN: 2456-2319 www.eecjournal.com Page | 20 useful arrangement. To a great degree compelling alter protection tends to include critical per-unit cost, also, sensor hubs are proposed to be exceptionally economical. 4.1 AES (RIJNDAEL) OVERVIEW Rijndael (articulated as in "rain doll" or "rhine dahl") is a piece figure outlined by Joan Daemen and Vincent Rijmen, the two cryptographers in Belgium. Rijndael can work over a variable-length piece utilizing variablelength keys; the adaptation 2 particular submitted to NIST portrays utilization of a 128-, 192-, or 256-piece key to scramble information obstructs that are 128, 192, or 256 bits in length; take note of that each of the nine mixes of key length and square length are conceivable. The calculation is composed in such a way that piece length or potentially key length can without much of a stretch be reached out in products of 32 bits and it is particularlyintended for proficient execution in equipment or programming on a scope of processors. The outline of Rijndael was unequivocally impacted by the piece figure. V. METHODOLOGY Data encryption is an imperative part of applying security to a wireless sensor systems. Despite the fact that transmission of information is the most energy consuming action in a remote sensor hub, it is likewise essential to choose a energy effective figure to limit energy utilization of the sensor hub. Subsequently symmetric key figure is commonly used to scramble information for transmission. Numerous block ciphers, for example, Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) utilizes various rounds of activities, for example, substitutions and linear transformations. Secured Power Aware Routing For Wireless Sensor Security is an important factor for performance and energy efficiency in many applications. Security serves as an important role in war zone, premise protection surveillance, airports, hospitals etc. Because of the property of sensor devices, the sensor systems may effortlessly be compromised by attackers who send manufactured or altered messages. To keep data and communication systems from unlawful delivery and modification, message verification and distinguishing proof should be analyzed through certificated mechanisms. The messages transmitted from the sensor hubs over a remote sensor systems ought to be verified by the collector. The strategy of cryptography is used for this part. It is a test for the researchers to find proper cryptography for remote sensor orchestrates on account of the limitations in control efficiency, computation capability and awesome stockpiling capacities. VI. CONCLUSION The proposed convention has been actualized utilizing Network Simulator (NS2). The execution measurements depends on control utilization, bundle conveyance proportion. The AES Based Secure Transmission in Wireless Sensor Networks accomplishes the application determined correspondence delays at low vitality cost by powerfully adjusting transmission control and directing choices alongside consolidating a novel cryptosystem for security. To keep data and correspondence frameworks from unlawful conveyance and alteration, message confirmation and ID is inspected through guaranteed instruments. The messages transmitted from the sensor hubs over a remote sensor systems is validated by the beneficiary. The method of cryptography is utilized for this system. The sender utilizes the proposed encryption calculation to make an impression on the beneficiary, through unsecured channel, and the collector utilizes the proposed unscrambling calculation to peruse the got message. The novel cryptosystem based Secured Power Aware Routing Protocol (SPARP) upgrades Quality of Service (QoS, for example, parcel conveyance proportion, delay and diminishes the power utilization between the hubs when bundles are transmitted. REFERENCES [1] R. Prema and R. Rangarajan, “Secured Power Aware Routing Protocol (SPARP) for Wireless Sensor Networks”, International Journal of Computer Applications, August 2012, Volume 51, No.7, pp.13- 18. [2] R. Prema and R. Rangarajan, “Secured Power Aware and Energy Efficient Routing Protocol(SPAEERP) For Wireless Sensor Networks”, International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering”, International Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Volume 2, Issue 1, February 2013, pp.7- 18. [3] Nikolaos A. Pantazis, StefaNos A. Nikolidakis and Dimitrios D. Vergados, “Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Second Quarter 2013, Vol. 15, No.2, pp. 551-589. [4] S.K. Singh, M.P. Singh, and D.K. Singh, “A Survey of Energy Efficient Hierarchical Cluster-based Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks,” International Journal of Advanced Networking and Application (IJANA), 2010, Vol. 02, issue 02, pp. 570–580.