Risk and Personnel Performance Using Oceanfile
1 like213 views
The document discusses different methods for assessing risk using SIRE reports, including counting observations, potential risk, assessed risk, and residual risk, with each method taking into account various factors like the content and significance of observations, corrective actions, and past performance. It also examines challenges with measuring experience and competence through tools like the VIQ Experience Tool and separate charterer requirements. Overall, the document considers how to best evaluate risk and performance using SIRE reports and other metrics.
Risk and Personnel Performance Using Oceanfile
- 1. Risk and Performance David Savage Tanker Shipping & Trade Conference and Awards, 15-16 November 2016,
- 2. Risk Assessment Using SIRE Reports 1. Count of Observations 2. Potential Risk 3. Assessed Risk 4. Residual/Final Risk
- 3. 1. Count of Observations o Major Industry KPI o Quick but basic o Observation content not taken into account o Numerous Observations will result in the vessel being rated “Technical Hold” o Technical Hold may have negative commercial impact
- 4. 2. Potential Risk o Used by charterers with Auto-Vetting systems o Each SIRE VIQ question is pre-set with potential Low, Med, High risk score o Risk value based on question topic and attendant risk possibilities o Every Observation automatically adjusted with the pre-set risk value o No account taken of the significance of the Observation words
- 5. 3. Assessed Risk o Observations manually reviewed o Potential Risk values adjusted if appropriate o High Potential Risk question associated a trivial observation may justify reducing the risk setting. o Low Potential Risk question associated with a high risk observation may justify increasing the risk setting o Result is Assessed Risk
- 6. 4. Residual Risk o “Fine Tuning” adjustment takes into account… o …nature of the Observation o …root cause o …corrective actions o …preventative actions o …was the same observation made previously? o …final assessment to determine residual risk.
- 7. Contractor to attend at Ulsan 9 Mar 2016
- 8. Filtering. Was the Observation… o Preventable? o Non-Conformity? o Low, Medium or High Risk? o Specific ISM Non-conformance? o Nature of Non-conformance? Who has lead responsibility? What is remedial action? What are Target and actual Close-out dates? Issue closed- out
- 9. Chapter 3 contains 16 questions None of these ask if the vessel has been operated safely and efficiently Experience vs Competence
- 10. The VIQ Experience Tool – Easy to access, Easy to measure, but…
- 11. 40+ Separate Charterers’ requirements …not only difficult to comply with
- 13. Measuring Personnel Performance History to Assess Competence
- 14. Experience, Competence and Past Performance “The unquantified blend of knowledge, experience and attitude. But how to measure at any one moment in time? Knowledge may grow or leak at the same time that experience is being accrued, while attitude ... the clear, consistent ability and temperament to always practice what has been absorbed ... now that's a challenge!” Jim Cripps
- 15. Oceanfile Marine Ltd 9 Quarantine Hill Wicklow Town Co. Wicklow Ireland www.oceanfile.com david.savage@oceanfile.com