ROBOTIC CATA.doc

i
ROBOTIC SURGERY
A Seminar Report submitted in
Communication Skills – English 205
By
Zaynab Karkaba
Under the Guidance of

ii
LIST OF CONTENTS
S.No Title Page.No
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. HISTORY 2
3. ROBOTIC SURGEONS 2
4. CLASSIFICATION 10 3
5. SUPERVISORY-CONTROLLED ROBOTIC SURGERY SYSTEMS 3
6. TELESURGICAL SYSTEMS 5
6.1 DA VINCI SURGICAL SYSTEM
6.2 ZEUS ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM 8
6.3 AESOP ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM 13
6.4 SHARED-CONTROL ROBOTIC SURGERY SYSTEM 14
7. APPLICATIONS 16
8. ADVANTAGES 17
9. LIMITATIONS 20
9.1 THE QUESTION OF SAFETY 20
9.2 THE COST 22
10. THE FUTURE 22
11. CONCLUSION 23
12. REFERENCES 24

iii
ABSTRACT
The field of surgery is entering a time of great change, spurred on by remarkable recent
advances in surgical and computer technology. Only recently have robotic systems made their
way into the operating room as dexterity-enhancing surgical assistants and surgical planners, in
answer to surgeons' demands for ways to overcome the surgical limitations of minimally
invasive laparoscopic surgery. The first generation of surgical robots is already being installed in
a number of operating rooms around the world. These aren't true autonomous robots, but they are
lending a mechanical helping hand to surgeons. Remote control and voice activation are the
methods by which these surgical robots are controlled. Robotics is being introduced to medicine
because they allow for unprecedented control and precision of surgical instruments in minimally
invasive procedures. The ultimate goal of the robotic surgery field is to design a robot that can be
used to perform closed-chest, beating-heart surgery. Robots in the field of surgery have
dramatically changed the procedures for the better. The most significant advantage to Robotic
Surgery to the patient is the decrease in pain and scaring. The smallness of the incisions also
causes many other advantages that make Robotic Surgery worth the risk. Besides the obvious
rewards to the patient, Robotic Surgery is also very advantageous to the surgeon and hospital.

1
1. INTRODUCTION:
Just as computers revolutionized the latter half of the 20th century, the field of robotics
has the potential to equally alter how we live in the 21st century. We've already seen how robots
have changed the manufacturing of cars and other consumer goods by streamlining and speeding
up the assembly line. We even have robotic lawn mowers and robotic pets. And robots have
enabled us to see places that humans are not yet able to visit, such as other planets and the depths
of the ocean. In the coming decades, we may see robots that have artificial intelligence. Some,
like Honda's ASIMO robot, will resemble the human form. They may eventually become self-
aware and conscious, and be able to do anything that a human can. When we talk about robots
doing the tasks of humans, we often talk about the future, but robotic surgery is already a reality.
Doctors around the world are using sophisticated robots to perform surgical procedures on
patients. While robotic surgery systems are still relatively uncommon, several hospitals around
the world have bought robotic surgical systems. These systems have the potential to improve the
safety and effectiveness of surgeries. But the systems also have some drawbacks. It's still a
relatively young science and it's very expensive. Some hospitals may be holding back on
adopting the technology. Robotic surgery is the use of robots in performing surgery. Three major
advances aided by surgical robots have been remote surgery, minimally invasive surgery and
unmanned surgery.

2
2. HISTORY:
In 1985 a robot, the PUMA 560, was used to place a needle for a brain biopsy using CT
guidance. In 1988, the PROBOT, developed at Imperial College London, was used to perform
prostatic surgery. The ROBODOC from Integrated Surgical Systems was introduced in 1992 to
mill out precise fittings in the femur for hip replacement. Further development of robotic systems
was carried out by Intuitive Surgical with the introduction of the da Vinci Surgical System and
Computer Motion with the AESOP and the ZEUS robotic surgical system.
• In 1997 a reconnection of the fallopian tubes operation was performed successfully in
Cleveland using ZEUS.
• In May 1998, Dr. Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr using the Da Vinci surgical robot performed
the first robotically assisted heart bypass at the Leipzig Heart Centre in Germany.
• In October 1999 the world's first surgical robotics beating heart coronary artery bypass
graft (CABG) was performed in Canada using the ZEUS surgical robot.
• In 2001, Prof. Marescaux used the Zeus robot to perform a cholecystectomy on a pig in
Strasbourg, France while in New York.
• The first unmanned robotic surgery took place in May 2006 in Italy.
3. ROBOTIC SURGEONS:
The first generation of surgical robots are already being installed in a number of
operating rooms around the world. These aren't true autonomous robots that can perform surgical
tasks on their own, but they are lending a mechanical helping hand to surgeons. These machines
still require a human surgeon to operate them and input instructions. Remote control and voice
activation are the methods by which these surgical robots are controlled. Robotics is being
introduced to medicine because they allow for unprecedented control and precision of surgical
instruments in minimally invasive procedures. So far, these machines have been used to position
an endoscope, perform gallbladder surgery and correct gastroesophogeal reflux and heartburn.
The ultimate goal of the robotic surgery field is to design a robot that can be used to perform
closed-chest, beating-heart surgery. According to one manufacturer, robotic devices could be
used in more than 3.5 million medical procedures per year in the United States alone. Here are
three surgical robots that have been recently developed:

3
• da Vinci Surgical System
• ZEUS Robotic Surgical System
• AESOP Robotic System
4. CLASSIFICATION:
Not all surgical robots are equal. There are three different kinds of robotic surgery systems:
 Supervisory-controlled systems
 Tele surgical systems
 Shared-control systems.
The main difference between each system is how involved a human surgeon must be when
performing a surgical procedure. On one end of the spectrum, robots perform surgical techniques
without the direct intervention of a surgeon. On the other end, doctors perform surgery with the
assistance of a robot, but the doctor is doing most of the work.
There are mainly three telesurgical robotic systems namely da Vinci Surgical System, ZEUS
Robotic Surgical System and AESOP Robotic System.
5. SUPERVISORY-CONTROLLED ROBOTIC SURGERY SYSTEMS:
Of the three kinds of robotic surgery, supervisory-controlled systems are the most
automated. But that doesn't mean these robots can perform surgery without any human guidance.
In fact, surgeons must do extensive prep work with surgery patients before the robot can operate.
Dr. Scott J. Boley demonstrates a robotic surgery system at the Montefiore Institute for
Minimally Invasive Surgery in New York City.

4
Fig 1 :Demonstration
That's because supervisory-controlled systems follow a specific set of instructions when
performing a surgery. The human surgeon must input data into the robot, which then initiates a
series of controlled motions and completes the surgery. There's no room for error -- these robots
can't make adjustments in real time if something goes wrong. Surgeons must watch over the
robot's actions and be ready to intervene if something doesn't go as planned. The reason surgeons
might want to use such a system is that they can be very precise, which in turn can mean reduced
trauma for the patient and a shorter recovery period. One common use for these robots is in hip
and knee replacement procedures. The robot's job is to drill existing bone so that an implant fits
snugly into the new joint. Because no two people have the exact same body structure, it's
impossible to have a standard program for the robot to follow. That means surgeons must map
the patient's body thoroughly so that the robot moves in the right way. They do this in a three-
step process called planning, registration and navigation In the planning stage, surgeons take
images of the patient's body to determine the right surgical approach. Common imaging methods
include computer tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans,
ultrasonography, fluoroscopy and X-ray scans. For some procedures, surgeons may have to place
pins into the bones of the patient to act as markers or navigation points for the computer. Once
the surgeon has imaged the patient, he or she must determine the surgical pathway the robot will
take. The surgeon must tell the robot what the proper surgical pathway is. The robot can't make
these decisions on its own. Once the surgeon programs the robot, it can follow instructions
exactly. The next step is registration. In this phase, the surgeon finds the points on the patient's

5
body that correspond to the images created during the planning phase. The surgeon must match
the points exactly in order for the robot to complete the surgery without error. The final phase is
navigation. This involves the actual surgery. The surgeon must first position the robot and the
patient so that every movement the robot makes corresponds with the information in its
programmed path. Once everyone is ready, the surgeon activates the robot, which carries out its
instructions.
6. TELESURGICAL SYSTEMS:
6.1 THE DA VINCI SURGICAL SYSTEM:
The basis of the dexterity experienced in open surgery relies on the almost unlimited
wrist, elbow and shoulder’s degree of freedom. The degree of freedom in laparoscopic surgery is
limited because instruments need to be long and are manipulated through fixed ports. The
surgeon has to move around these fixed ports. In order to solve these limitations tools have been
developed that have an articulation at the tip, which increases the degrees of freedom. Addition
of the wrist at the tip of the instrument gives tool manipulation much more complex. Computer
assistance is warranted, as the human brain cannot efficiently manipulate articulated instruments
by mechanical means. A robotic wrist provides articulated motions with a full 7 degrees of
freedom inside the abdominal or thoracic cavities. A product of the company Intuitive Surgical,
the da Vinci Surgical System is perhaps the most famous robotic surgery apparatus in the world.
It falls under the category of telesurgical devices, meaning a human directs the motions of the
robot. In a way, this makes the robot a very expensive high-tech set of tools. Types of
instruments used by the da Vinci Surgical System

6
Fig 2 : da Vinci surgical system
On July 11, 2000, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the da Vinci
Surgical System for laparoscopic procedures, making it the first robotic system allowed in
American operating rooms. The da Vinci uses technology that allows the human surgeon to get
closer to the surgical site than human vision will allow, and work at a smaller scale than
conventional surgery permits. The $1.5 million da Vinci system consists of two primary
components:
• A viewing and control console
• A surgical arm unit that includes three or four arms, depending on the model
It has four robotic arms. Three of them are for tools that hold objects, act as a scalpel,
scissors, bovie, or unipolar or dipolar electrocautery instruments. The fourth arm is for a camera
with two lenses that gives the surgeon full stereoscopic vision from the console. The surgeon is
seated at a set of controls and looks through two eye holes at a 3-D image of the procedure, while
maneuvering the arms with two foot pedals and two hand controllers. In using da Vinci for

7
surgery, a human surgeon makes three or four incisions (depending on the number of arms the
model has) -- no larger than the diameter of a pencil -- in the patient's abdomen, which allows
the surgeons to insert three or four stainless-steel rods. The robotic arms hold the rods in place.
One of the rods has two endoscopic cameras inside it that provide a stereoscopic image, while
the other rods have surgical instruments that are able to dissect and suture the tissue. Unlike in
conventional surgery, the doctor does not touch these surgical instruments directly. Sitting at the
control console a few feet from the operating table, the surgeon looks into a viewfinder to
examine the 3-D images being sent by the camera inside the patient. The images show the
surgical site and the two or three surgical instruments mounted on the tips of the surgical rods.
The surgeon uses joystick-like controls located underneath the screen to manipulate the surgical
instruments. Each time the surgeon moves one of the joysticks, a computer sends an electronic
signal to one of the instruments, which moves in sync with the movements of the surgeon's
hands. Working together, surgeon and robot can perform complete surgical procedures without
the need for large incisions. Once the surgery is complete, the surgeons remove the rods from the
patient's body and close the incisions. The da Vinci System is FDA cleared for a variety of
surgical procedures including
• Prostate cancer surgery.
• Hysterectomy.
• Mitral valve repair.
• Prostatectomies
• Cardiac valve repair
• Gynecologic surgical procedures
• Abdominal surgical procedures
• Thoracic surgical procedures
Surgeons are beginning to employ the da Vinci System to remove tumors on the liver and
pancreas, on account of the delicacy of the procedure, the number of blood vessels that the
surgeon must deal with, and the single location of the operation. Procedures that are not
localized and require the surgeon to move around to different areas are very inconvenient,
considering the time it takes to set up the da Vinci System's ports.

8
Fig 3: Instruments used in Da Vinci Surgical System
6.2 ZEUS ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM:
The ZEUS Surgical System is made up of an ergonomic surgeon control console and
three table-mounted robotic arms, which perform surgical tasks and provide visualization during
endoscopic surgery. Seated at an ergonomic console with an unobstructed view of the OR, the
surgeon controls the right and left arms of ZEUS, which translate to real-time articulation of the
surgical instruments. A third arm incorporates the AESOP® Endoscope Positioner technology,
which provides the surgeon with magnified, rock-steady visualization of the internal operative
field.

9
Fig 4: ZEUS SURGICAL SYSTEM
Peerless voice control capabilities allow the surgeon to precisely guide the movements of
the endoscope with simple spoken commands, freeing the surgeon's hands to manipulate the
robotic surgical instrument handles. ZEUS custom scales the movement of these handles and
filters out hand tremor, enabling surgeons with greater capability to perform complex micro-
surgical tasks.
The ZEUS Surgical System features the following components:
 Video Console
 Primary Video Monitor up to 23"W x 23"D
 Flat Panel Monitor: with support for an additional flat panel

10
Surgeon Control Console
 Touch Screen Monitor
 Support Arms and Surgeon Handles
 Mounting Areas: for speakers; access to controller front panels; access to PC and
HERMES™ control center; mounting shelves for housing Control Units
Industry Standard Mechanism - easy sterilization .
• Incorporates mechanism design based on standard flushing port and push-pull rod
technology, the same makeup as industry-standard endoscopic equipment. Provides easy
sterilization.
Instrument Reusabilty
• Uses robust, reusable instruments, built to withstand the rigorous OR environment.
Instrument and Port Size
• Offers unparalleled precision through 3.5 to 5-mm instrument and endoscope
accommodation.
Wide Array of Instruments
• Offers a suite of more than 40 ZEUS®-compatible instruments, available in a variety of
shaft diameters, from industry leaders Scanlan, Storz and US Surgical.
Quick Instrument Changes
• Incorporates a quick-change mechanism to seamlessly swap instruments and safely guide
the placement of the instrument tips.
Console Placement
• Provides total flexibility in overall console placement, easily converting from setup
directly at the operating table to setup as a physically removed console.
Rapid Setup
• Takes less than 15 minutes to set up.
Visualization
• Designed to adapt to individual surgeon preferences in viewing modes, permits both 2D
and 3D visualization and accommodates a wide variety of endoscopes and monitor
setups.
Secondary Monitors

11
• Secondary flatscreen video monitors mount parallel to the main monitor to provide
additional patient data including vitals, image guidance reference display and a redundant
view of the operative field for use with SOCRATES™.
Profile
• Built lightweight for easy installation and flexible adjustment, ZEUS® maintains a low
profile. Its twin instrument positioning arms adhere equally to this design imperative,
allowing assistant to retract, suction and irrigate during surgery.
Operation
• A user-friendly, single foot pedal provides device engagement and disengagement. When
engaged, specific controls are easily accessed using voice control and touch screen
interfaces.
Microwrist Hand Controls
• MicroWrist form-fitting hand controls translate the surgeon's movements with precise
scaling and hand tremor filtering.
Six Degrees of Freedom
 4 Motorized
o Up and Down
o In and Out
o Shoulder: Back and Forth
o Elbow: back and forth
 2 Floating
o Forearm: back and forth - safety function: float away to avoid ramming
something
o Wrist
 1 Fixed change in angle
o Elbow Tilt (+/- 3 degrees)
Scaling
 Offers infinite motion scaling, without limitation to arbitrarily defined increments.
Scaling adjustment can be accomplished using either touchscreen or voice command.
Seating Accomodation
 Ergonomic console and seat provides optimal surgeon comfort for long procedures

12
Repositioning
 During surgery, endoscopic and instrument positioning arms tilt with the operating
table; this flexible design eliminates the need to readjust or recalibrate the arms.
Re-Indexing
 At any time, the foot pedal releases the clutch, allowing surgeons to relax and
reposition (center and re-index) their hands and arms.
Endiscopic Position Saving
 Provides the powerful capability to save 3 different endoscopic positions, retaining x-
y-x axis coordinates that can be quickly and easily returned to at any time.
Voice Control
 Voice control components leverage the advantages of a sophisticated overall
communications paradigm: individual surgeon voice modeling; context sensitive tree
command structure; limited vocabulary for error avoidance; voice and visual
feedback on command success; compensation for ambient OR noise.
Pendant Control
 Device control and communications options are embedded also in ZEUS. portable
pendant device, allowing flexible, duplicate control options that transcend the OR's
sterile boundary.
Mirror Redundancy
 Uses mirror redundancy technology at a rate of up to 1000 times per second to ensure
patient safety

13
6.3 AESOP ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM:
The AESOP system employs the assistance of the Automated Endoscopic System for
optical position. AESOP was the first robot to be cleared by FDA for assisting surgery in the
operating room. AESOP is much simpler than the da Vinci and Zeus system. It is used by the
physician to position the endoscope of a surgical camera inserted into the patient. Voice
activated software allow the physician to position the camera leaving her hands free. The
AESOP robotic surgical system was very complex. So that it cannot be used in operating rooms.

14
SURGEON BENEFITS:
• Its enhanced three dimensional visualization provides the surgeon with a true three-
dimensional view of the operating field. This direct and natural hand and eye instrument
is similar to open surgery with all around vision and ability to 300m in and 300m out.
• Improved dexterity: It provides the surgeon with intensive operative controls.
• Greater surgical precision: It permits the surgeon to control the instrument with high
accuracy. It can be simply controlled by the movement of instruments.
• Increased range of motion: Endowrist instruments are used in this surgical system. It has
the ability to rotate the instruments more than 300 degrees through tiny incisions
6.4 SHARED-CONTROL ROBOTIC SURGERY SYSTEMS:
Shared-control robotic systems aid surgeons during surgery, but the human does most of
the work. Unlike the other robotic systems, the surgeons must operate the surgical instruments
themselves. The robotic system monitors the surgeon's performance and provides stability and
support through active constraint. A nurse prepares a robotic surgery system for heart surgery.
Active constraint is a concept that relies on defining regions on a patient as one of four
possibilities: safe, close, boundary or forbidden. Surgeons define safe regions as the main focus

15
of a surgery. For example, in orthopedic surgery, the safe region might be a specific site on the
patient's hip. Safe regions don't border soft tissues. In orthopedic surgery, a close region is one
that borders soft tissue. Since orthopedic surgical tools can do a lot of damage to soft tissue, the
robot constrains the area the surgeon can operate within. It does this by providing haptic
responses, also known as force feedback. As the surgeon approaches the soft tissue, the robot
pushes back against the surgeon's hand. As the surgeon gets closer to soft tissue, the instrument
enters the boundary region. At this point, the robot will offer more resistance, indicating the
surgeon should move away from that area. If the surgeon continues cutting toward the soft tissue,
the robot locks into place. Anything from that point on is the forbidden region. Robotic surgeons
can be intimidating -- they don't have the best bedside manner.
Like the other robots we've looked at, shared-control system robots don't automatically
know the difference between a safe region versus a forbidden region. The surgeons must first go
through the planning, registration and navigation phases with a patient. Only after inputting that
information into the robot's system can the robot offer guidance. Out of the three kinds of robot
surgical systems, the telesurgical approach has received the most attention. The success of the da

16
Vinci Surgical System caught the attention of doctors and the media alike. We may see more
examples of shared-control and supervisory-controlled systems in the future.
7. APPLICATIONS:
Cardiac surgery
Endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) surgery and mitral valve replacement have
been performed. Totally closed chest, endoscopic mitral valve surgeries are being performed
now with the robot. Irfan mulic was the first person to have this done to him.
Gastrointestinal surgery
Multiple types of procedures have been performed with either the Zeus or da Vinci robot
systems, including bariatric surgery.
Gynecology
Robotic surgery in gynecology is one of the fastest growing fields of robotic surgery.
This includes the use of the da Vinci surgical system in benign gynecology and gynecologic
oncology. Robotic surgery can be used to treat fibroids, abnormal periods, endometriosis,
ovarian tumors, pelvic prolapse, and female cancers. Using the robotic system, gynecologists can
perform hysterectomies, myomectomies, and lymph node biopsies. The need for large abdominal
incisions is virtually eliminated. It can also be used for tubal re-anastomosis, hysterectomies and
ovary resection.

17
Neurosurgery
Several systems for stereotactic intervention are currently on the market. MD Robotic's
NeuroArm is the world’s first MRI-compatible surgical robot. Surgical robotics has been used in
many types of surgical procedures including complement-image-guided surgery and
radiosurgery.
Orthopedics
The ROBODOC system was released in 1992 by the Integrated Surgical Systems,
Inc.Surgical robotics has been used in many types of orthopedic surgical procedures including
total hip arthoplasty: femur preparation, acetabular cup replacement, knee surgery and spine
surgery.
Pediatrics
Surgical robotics has been used in many types of pediatric surgical procedures including:
tracheoesophageal fistula repair, cholecystectomy, nissen fundoplication, morgagni hernia repair,
kasai portoenterostomy, congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair, and others. On January 17,
2002, surgeons at Children's Hospital of Michigan in Detroitperformed the nation's first
advanced computer-assisted robot-enhanced surgical procedure at a children's hospital.
Radiosurgery
The CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System uses image-guidance and computer
controlled robotics to treat tumors throughout the body by delivering multiple beams of high-
energy radiation to the tumor from virtually any direction.
Urology
The da Vinci robot is commonly used to remove the prostate gland for cancer, repair
obstructed kidneys, repair bladder abnormalities and remove diseased kidneys. New minimally
invasive robotic devices using steerable flexible needles are currently being developed for use in
prostate brachytherapy.
8. ADVANTAGES:
Robots in the field of surgery have dramatically changed the procedures for the better.
The most significant advantage to Robotic Surgery to the patient is the decrease in pain and

18
scaring. By using cameras and enhanced visual effects, doctors can make the tinniest of
incisions. The da Vinci and Zeus system each use “arms” to operate. In order for these arms to
get inside the body and operate, they only need a few centimeters for an incision. In fact The San
Matteo Hospital in Pavia, Italy performed a Cardiac Bypass surgery that included three incisions,
each about one centimeter in length. Typically in that type of surgery the incision is about 30
centimeters in length. The smallness of the incisions also causes many other advantages that
make Robotic Surgery worth the risk. Due to the small and precise cuttings, the patient’s
hospital stay is greatly reduced. A person needs far less recovery time when they have 3-
centimeter scars than when they have a scar almost 10 times as large. Also, the risk of infection
or complications decreases as the incision size does. The patient mentioned earlier with the
Closed Heart Bypass surgery is a terrific example. After his surgery, he was cleared by his
surgeon Dr. Mauro Rinaldi and released from the hospital after only 12 hours of recovery. The
next week he was actually able to join his family on a vacation. In today's operating rooms, you'll
find two or three surgeons, an anesthesiologist and several nurses, all needed for even the
simplest of surgeries. Most surgeries require nearly a dozen people in the room. As with all
automation, surgical robots will eventually eliminate the need for some personnel. Taking a
glimpse into the future, surgery may require only one surgeon, an anesthesiologist and one or
two nurses. In this nearly empty operating room, the doctor sits at a computer console, either in
or outside the operating room, using the surgical robot to accomplish what it once took a crowd
of people to perform.

19
The use of a computer console to perform operations from a distance opens up the idea of
telesurgery, which would involve a doctor performing delicate surgery miles away from the
patient. The doctor doesn't have to stand over the patient to perform the surgery, and can control
the robotic arms from a computer station just a few feet away from the patient. Having fewer
personnel in the operating room and allowing doctors the ability to operate on a patient long-
distance could lower the cost of health care in the long term. Besides the obvious rewards to the
patient, Robotic Surgery is also very advantageous to the surgeon and hospital. In the ZEUS
Surgical System, an “arm” on the machine is dedicated to the Automated Endoscopic System for
Optimal Positioning (AESOP). AESOP is a 3D camera used in robotic surgery. It can be zoomed
in by either voice activation or pedals located at the surgeons foot. Doctors who have used this
actually argue that AESOP gives a better image than in real life. This is particularly true with
surgeons that have poor vision or in microscopic surgeries that deal with nerves. Also, by using
the hand controls the surgeons can reach places in the body that are normally unreachable by the
human hand. Finally, the clearest advantage to using robots in surgery is in long operations,
particularly ones that deal with nerve or tissue reconstruction. Surgeons often tire easily after
performing microscopic surgery’s that last hours. However, by having the ability to be seated

20
and have less strain on the eyes, doctors can control their natural flinching or nerves more
efficiently
Post-Surgery
• Less scarring
• Faster recovery time
• Tiny incisions
• 0% Transfusion rate
• Shorter catheter time 5 vs. 14 days
• Immediate urinary control
• Significantly shorter return to normal activities ( 1-2 weeks )
• Equal Cancer Cure Rate
• Less post operative pain
In-Surgery
• Surgeons have enhanced view
• Easier to attach nerve endings
• Surgeons tire less easily
• Fewer doctors required in operating rooms
• In turn, cheaper for hospitals.
• Smaller risk of infection
• Less anesthesia required
• Less loss of blood
9. LIMITATIONS:
9.1 The Question of Safety:
In comparison to robots used in the industrial sector, medical robots present designers
with much more complicated safety problems. Some of the most important factors which lead to
such complexity are described below:
 Human presence: In an industrial situation, there are no humans present in the
application environment. Should that be necessary, safety regulations specify that the

21
robot be de-activated while humans are in the vicinity. This greatly simplifies the
safety requirements and their satisfaction. In the medical sector, however, robots are
required to assist rather than to replace humans. In that respect, they must be able to
work in close proximity to humans and perform well in a chaotic, time-varying
environment. This requires medical robots to have rich sensory and reasoning
capabilities concerning their environment, something that both pushes the current
technology to the limits and presents robot designers with insurmountable obstacles.
 Fault consequences: This is closely related not only to the presence of humans near
the robot, but also to the nature of the task of the robot, which typically involves a
human patient. In the industrial sector, a fault can mean at most some loss of physical
equipment. In the medical sector, where lives are at stake, the implications are of
profound importance.
 Non-generic task: In the industrial sector, the robot is required to perform a series of
movements in some pre-defined order. The object it is operating on, be it as simple as
a metal pipe or as complex as a car, is not distinguished in any way, that is, the robot
is not required to take account of differences on an object-by-object basis, but treats
them all as being equal. When dealing with patients, however, this is not possible.
Each patient has their own distinguishing characteristics, making a uniform approach
inappropriate. In safety terms, this requires testing, or at least reasoning about
infinitely many scenarios.
Possible reasons that can lead to unsafe operation of a medical unit include flawed design,
malfunction of hardware and software components, misinterpretation and incorrect or inadequate
specification. As in many other applications, improving some of these parameters results in a
degraded performance in other areas, while an overall increased level of safety is accompanied
by an increase in cost, complexity, or both. The idea of total safety is a fallacy. Instead, different
safety strategies offer different advantages (and, or course, disadvantages). The overall
probability of error must be always kept at very low levels. Perhaps even more important than
the probability of a fault is the ability to detect that a fault has indeed occurred and prevent
hazards resulting from it, that is, allow the robot to "fail safely". This usually involves shutting
the robot down and removing it from the patient, and having the operation manually completed
by a surgeon.

22
As the task which the robot undertakes becomes more and more complicated, there is an
increasing need for more complex hardware and software components (faster response, better
accuracy, more degrees of freedom). This increases the probability of error exponentially.
Software is notoriously difficult to reason about, while hardware reliability never ceases to be of
prime importance. A final consideration concerning safety is, perhaps surprisingly, size. Both
patients and doctors feel uncomfortable working next to medical robots which tower above the
surgeon at over 7 feet and weigh in at several tens of kilograms. There is some logic behind that,
however. A larger robot can usually exert more force than a smaller one, resulting in an
increased amount of damage in case of a fault.
9.2 The Cost:
The Robots that perform the surgeries cost around $750,000 to over $1 million. This is
because they use extremely sensitive and experimental equipment that costs a lot of money. In
addition to the cost of the machines the training that is needed for surgeons to learn how to use
the systems is also very expensive. Because of the extreme cost of the machines at this point in
time the procedures are slightly more expensive than a regular operation, but it does have its
advantages. Many people in the medical field however believe that these surgeries will soon
become more common and less expensive
10. THE FUTURE:
Robotic surgery is in its infancy. Many obstacles and disadvantages will be resolved in
time and no doubt many other questions will arise. Many questions have yet to be asked;
questions such as malpractice liability, credentialing, training requirements, and interstate
licensing for tele-surgeons, to name just a few. Many of current advantages in robotic assisted
surgery ensure its continued development and expansion. For example, the sophistication of the
controls and the multiple degrees of freedom afforded by the Zeus and da Vinci systems allow
increased mobility and no tremor without comprising the visual field to make micro anastomosis
possible. Many have made the observation that robotic systems are information systems and as
such they have the ability to interface and integrate many of the technologies being developed
for and currently used in the operating room. One exciting possibility is expanding the use of
preoperative (computed tomography or magnetic resonance) and intraoperative video image
fusion to better guide the surgeon in dissection and identifying pathology. These data may also

23
be used to rehearse complex procedures before they are undertaken. The nature of robotic
systems also makes the possibility of long-distance intraoperative consultation or guidance
possible and it may provide new opportunities for teaching and assessment of new surgeons
through mentoring and simulation. Computer Motion, the makers of the Zeus robotic surgical
system, is already marketing a device called SOCRATES that allows surgeons at remote sites to
connect to an operating room and share video and audio, to use a “telestrator” to highlight
anatomy, and to control the AESOP endoscopic camera.
Technically, many remains to be done before robotic surgery’s full potential can be
realized. Although these systems have greatly improved dexterity, they have yet to develop the
full potential in instrumentation or to incorporate the full range of sensory input. More standard
mechanical tools and more energy directed tools need to be developed. Some authors also
believe that robotic surgery can be extended into the realm of advanced diagnostic testing with
the development and use of ultrasonography, near infrared, and confocal microscopy equipment.
Much like the robots in popular culture, the future of robotics in surgery is limited only by
imagination. Many future “advancements” are already being researched. Some laboratories,
including the authors’ laboratory, are currently working on systems to relay touch sensation from
robotic instruments back to the surgeon. Other laboratories are working on improving current
methods and developing new devices for suture-less anastomoses. When most people think about
robotics, they think about automation. The possibility of automating some tasks is both exciting
and controversial. Future systems might include the ability for a surgeon to program the surgery
and merely supervise as the robot performs most of the tasks. The possibilities for improvement
and advancement are only limited by imagination and cost.
11. CONCLUSION:
Although still in its infancy, robotic surgery has already proven itself to be of great value,
particularly in areas inaccessible to conventional laparoscopic procedures. It remains to be seen,
however, if robotic systems will replace conventional laparoscopic instruments in less
technically demanding procedures. In any case, robotic technology is set to revolutionize surgery
by improving and expanding laparoscopic procedures, advancing surgical technology, and
bringing surgery into the digital age. Furthermore, it has the potential to expand surgical
treatment modalities beyond the limits of human ability. Whether or not the benefit of its usage

24
overcomes the cost to implement it remains to be seen and much remains to be worked out.
Although feasibility has largely been shown, more prospective randomized trials evaluating
efficacy and safety must be undertaken. Further research must evaluate cost effectiveness or a
true benefit over conventional therapy for robotic surgery to take full root.
12. REFERENCES:
1. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robotic_surgery
2. http://www.library.thinkquest.org
3. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov
4. http://www.howstuffworks.com/robotic-surgery
5. http://www.google.com/robotic_surgery

ROBOTIC CATA.doc

More Related Content

Similar to ROBOTIC CATA.doc (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

ROBOTIC CATA.doc