![designated to document practicum activity. You are required to
use this template for all journal entry submissions.
Document: Midterm Exam Study Guide (Word document)
Document: Final Exam Study Guide (Word document)
Document: NP Student Clinical Orientation (PowerPoint file)
Document: Practicum Manual (PDF). Retrieved from
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ld.php?content_id=7356923
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2016). Introduction to
psychotherapy with individuals [Video file]. Baltimore, MD:
Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 2 minutes.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/rubricdetailselectgridvieworlistviewtochangetheru-221018140204-0ff316de/85/Rubric-Detail-Select-Grid-View-or-List-View-to-change-the-ru-docx-10-320.jpg)
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the ru.docx
- 1. Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout. Content Name: NURS_6640_Week1_Discussion_Rubric · Grid View · List View Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Points Range: 44 (44%) - 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. supported by at least 3 current, credible sources Points Range: 40 (40%) - 43 (43%) Responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
- 2. supported by at least 3 credible references Points Range: 35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Responds to most of the discussion question(s) is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references Points Range: 31 (31%) - 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s) one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references Points Range: 0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. contains only 1 or no credible references Main Posting:
- 3. Writing Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely Contains no grammatical or spelling errors Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Written clearly and concisely May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Written concisely May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Written somewhat concisely May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors Contains some APA formatting errors Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Not written clearly or concisely Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style Main Posting: Timely and full participation Points Range: 10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation
- 4. posts main discussion by due date Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation First Response: Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. Points Range: 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth First Response: Writing Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
- 5. Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing
- 6. No credible sources are cited First Response: Timely and full participation Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts by due date Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation Second Response: Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. Points Range: 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth Second Response:
- 7. Writing Points Range: 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited
- 8. Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited Second Response: Timely and full participation Points Range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation Posts by due date Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation Total Points: 100 Required Readings American Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiatric-mental health nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. · Standard 1 “Assessment” (pages 44 & 45) Note: Throughout the program you will be reading excerpts from the ANA’s Scope & Standards of Practice for Psychiatric- Mental Health Nursing. It is essential to your success on the ANCC board certification exam for Psychiatric/Mental Health Nurse Practitioners that you know the scope of practice of the
- 9. advanced practice psychiatric/mental health nurse. You should also be able to differentiate between the generalist RN role in psychiatric/mental health nursing and the advanced practice nurse role. Wheeler, K. (Eds.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. · Chapter 1, “The Nurse Psychotherapist and a Framework for Practice” (pp. 3–52) Fournier, J. C., & Price, R. B. (2014). Psychotherapy and neuroimaging. Psychotherapy: New Evidence and New Approaches, 12(3), 290–298. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4207360/ Holttum, S. (2014). When bad things happen our brains change but psychotherapy and support can help the recovery of our brains and our lives. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 18(2), 52–58. doi:10.1108/MHSI-02-2014-0006 Petiprin, A. (2016). Psychiatric and mental health nursing. Nursing Theory. Retrieved from http://www.nursing- theory.org/theories-and-models/psychiatric-and-mental-health- nursing.php Fisher, M. A. (2016). Introduction. In Confidentiality limits in psychotherapy: Ethics checklists for mental health professionals (pp. 3–12). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14860-001 Document: Practicum Journal Template (Word document) Note: This template is provided by the School of Nursing and is
- 10. designated to document practicum activity. You are required to use this template for all journal entry submissions. Document: Midterm Exam Study Guide (Word document) Document: Final Exam Study Guide (Word document) Document: NP Student Clinical Orientation (PowerPoint file) Document: Practicum Manual (PDF). Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ld.php?content_id=7356923 Required Media Laureate Education (Producer). (2016). Introduction to psychotherapy with individuals [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 2 minutes.