Ryan E Toivola dissertation

1
Mechanochromic Fluorescent Probe Molecules for Damage Detection in Aerospace Polymers
and Composites
Ryan E Toivola
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
University of Washington
2013
Reading Committee:
Brian Flinn, Chair
Alex Jen
Christine Luscombe
Program Authorized to Offer Degree:
Materials Science & Engineering

2
University of Washington
Abstract
Mechanochromic Fluorescent Probe Molecules for Damage Detection in Aerospace Polymers
and Composites
Ryan E Toivola
Chair of the Supervisory Committee:
Dr. Brian Flinn
Materials Science & Engineering
The detection of damage in aerospace composites can be improved by incorporation of
mechanochromic fluorescent probe molecules into the polymers used in composite parts. This
study focuses on a novel series of mechanochromic probes, AJNDE15 and AJNDE17, which are
incorporated in structural epoxy resin DGEBA-DETA.
Chapter 1 details the characterization of the DGEBA-DETA epoxy system used in this study.
The important characteristics of DGEBA-DETA’s response to mechanical loading will be
discussed within the larger field of glassy amorphous polymer deformation. The mechanical,

3
thermal, and chemical properties of DGEBA-DETA relevant to this work will be measured using
standardized techniques and instrumentation.
Chapters 2 and 3 focus on the mechanochromic probes AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 in the DGEBA-
DETA system. Chapter 2 presents research designed to identify the mechanism through which
the probes display mechanochromism. The possible mechanochromic mechanisms are
introduced in a literature review. Research on these probes in DGEBA-DETA will be presented
and discussed with respect to the possible mechanisms, and the mechanism that best fits the
results will be identified as a mechanochemical reaction.
Chapter 3 continues the analysis of the mechanochromism of the probes in DGEBA-DETA. The
kinetics of the mechanochromic reaction will be studied and compared with the current
understanding of glassy polymer deformation. Possible models for the molecular interactions
responsible for mechanochromism in this system will be put forward. Research will be
presented to evaluate the mechanochromism kinetics and for comparison with the behavior
predicted by the models.

4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
1. Barely Visible Impact Damage in polymer composites ....................................................... 12
1.1 Ultrasonic NDE methods ............................................................................................... 13
1.2 Project motivation and organization .............................................................................. 14
2. Fluorescence, mechanochromism and ratiometry................................................................. 16
2.1 Fluorescence................................................................................................................... 16
2.2 Fluorescent ratiometric probes....................................................................................... 17
2.3 Fluorescent mechanochromic probes............................................................................. 22
3. Research plan........................................................................................................................ 22
3.1 Document organization .................................................................................................. 23
CHAPTER 1 - CHARACTERIZATION OF EPOXY POLYMER SYSTEM
1. Introduction........................................................................................................................... 24
1.1 Epoxy and curing agent.................................................................................................. 24
1.1.1 Epoxy - DGEBA..................................................................................................... 24
1.1.2 Curing agent - DETA.............................................................................................. 25
1.2 Curing of DGEBA-DETA.............................................................................................. 26
1.3 Room temperature cured DGEBA-DETA ..................................................................... 28

5
1.4 Mechanical deformation of epoxy polymers.................................................................. 29
1.4.1 Elastic deformation................................................................................................. 30
1.4.2 Yielding and post-yield behavior............................................................................ 31
1.4.3 Unloading and recovery......................................................................................... 34
1.4.4 Yielding, post-yielding, and energy considerations................................................ 37
1.4.5 Strain hardening...................................................................................................... 40
1.4.6 Comparison of epoxy to general amorphous glassy polymers ............................... 41
1.5 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 42
2. Characterization methods...................................................................................................... 43
2.1 Characterization of cure ................................................................................................. 43
2.1.1 Differential Scanning Calorimetry.......................................................................... 44
2.1.2 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy .............................................................. 45
2.1.3 Absorbance ............................................................................................................. 46
2.2 Characterization of solid epoxy polymer ....................................................................... 46
2.2.1 Glass transition temperature ................................................................................... 46
2.2.2 Mechanical properties............................................................................................. 47
2.2.3 Optical properties.................................................................................................... 49
3. DGEBA-DETA during cure ................................................................................................. 52
3.1 DSC cure characterization.............................................................................................. 53
3.1.1 Effect of stoichiometry ........................................................................................... 53

6
3.1.2 FTIR cure characterization ..................................................................................... 54
3.1.3 Absorbance during cure.......................................................................................... 56
3.2 Summary of cure characterization.................................................................................. 57
4. Solid DGEBA-DETA Characterization................................................................................ 57
4.1 Glass Transition.............................................................................................................. 58
4.2 Mechanical Properties.................................................................................................... 58
4.2.1 Elastic modulus, yield strength and strain .............................................................. 59
4.2.2 Strain recovery........................................................................................................ 60
4.2.3 DSC of deformed samples ...................................................................................... 61
4.3 Optical properties........................................................................................................... 62
4.3.1 Excitation and emission spectra.............................................................................. 62
4.3.2 Absorbance ............................................................................................................. 63
4.3.3 In situ emission ....................................................................................................... 66
4.4 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 70
CHAPTER 2 - MECHANOCHROMISM IN EPOXY POLYMER
1. Introduction........................................................................................................................... 72
1.1 Approach # 1 - Aggregation-based mechanisms............................................................ 72
1.1.1 Aggregation-based mechanochromism................................................................... 74
1.2 Approach #2 – Intramolecular isomer mechanism ........................................................ 77
1.2.1 Free volume in polymers ........................................................................................ 79

7
1.2.2 Epoxy free volume.................................................................................................. 80
1.2.3 Intramolecular isomer probes - mechanochromism................................................ 80
1.3 Approach #3 – Mechanochemical reaction mechanism................................................. 82
1.3.1 Mechanochemical reaction - mechanochromism.................................................... 83
1.4 Approach #4 – Scission based mechanism .................................................................... 85
1.4.1 Scission-based mechanism - mechanochromism.................................................... 85
1.5 Proposed mechanism – Conjugation pathway interference ........................................... 87
1.6 Summary of mechanochromic mechanisms................................................................... 89
2. Mechanochromic characterization methods ......................................................................... 90
2.1 Materials and sample preparation .................................................................................. 90
2.1.1 AJNDE15................................................................................................................ 90
2.1.2 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA - Mixing and curing................................................ 91
2.1.3 AJNDE17................................................................................................................ 91
2.1.4 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA - Mixing and curing................................................ 92
2.2 Characterization methods............................................................................................... 93
2.2.1 Cure characterization .............................................................................................. 93
2.2.2 Characterization of solid polymer........................................................................... 94
3. Characterization of AJNDE15 mechanochromism............................................................... 96
3.1 Characterization of cure ................................................................................................. 97
3.2 Absorbance..................................................................................................................... 97

8
3.3 Characterization of solid polymer.................................................................................. 99
3.3.1 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA – Excitation and emission..................................... 100
3.3.2 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA – Uniaxial compression........................................ 102
3.3.3 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA - Stoichiometry..................................................... 105
3.3.4 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA - Elevated temperature.......................................... 106
3.3.5 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA - Time stability after deformation ........................ 110
4. Characterization of AJNDE17 mechanochromism............................................................. 111
4.1.1 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA - Mixing and curing.............................................. 112
4.1.2 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA – Uniaxial compression........................................ 112
4.1.3 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA – Hydrostatic pressure.......................................... 115
4.1.4 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA - Stoichiometry..................................................... 116
4.1.5 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA - Elevated temperature.......................................... 117
4.1.6 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA - Time stability after deformation ........................ 118
5. Evaluation of mechanochromic mechanisms...................................................................... 119
5.1 Aggregation-based approach........................................................................................ 120
5.1.1 Curing ................................................................................................................... 120
5.1.2 Mechanical deformation & hydrostatic pressure.................................................. 120
5.1.3 Stoichiometry........................................................................................................ 121
5.1.4 Elevated temperature ............................................................................................ 121
5.1.5 Time stability ........................................................................................................ 122

9
5.1.6 Summary of aggregation approach....................................................................... 123
5.2 Intramolecular approach............................................................................................... 123
5.2.1 Curing ................................................................................................................... 124
5.2.3 Stoichiometry........................................................................................................ 125
5.2.5 Time stability ........................................................................................................ 128
5.2.6 Summary of intramolecular isomer approach....................................................... 128
5.3 Mechanochemical reaction approach........................................................................... 129
5.3.1 Curing ................................................................................................................... 129
5.3.3 Stoichiometry........................................................................................................ 130
5.3.5 Time stability ........................................................................................................ 131
5.3.6 Summary of mechanochemical approach ............................................................. 132
5.4 Chain scission approach............................................................................................... 133
5.5 Proposed mechanism – Conjugation pathway interference ......................................... 134
5.5.1 Curing ................................................................................................................... 135
5.5.2 Uniaxial compression & hydrostatic pressure ...................................................... 135
5.5.3 Stoichiometry........................................................................................................ 136

10
5.5.5 Time stability ........................................................................................................ 137
5.5.6 Summary of mechanochromic mechanisms ......................................................... 137
5.6 Summary of mechanochromic mechanism evaluation................................................. 138
CHAPTER 3 - MODELING AND KINETICS OF MECHANOCHROMISM
1. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 140
2. Model framework for probe behavior................................................................................. 140
2.1 Zhurkov model............................................................................................................. 141
2.1.1 Hypothesis and experiment................................................................................... 142
2.2 Kinetic analysis methods.............................................................................................. 143
2.2.1 Assumptions required for kinetic analysis............................................................ 145
2.2.2 Order of reaction................................................................................................... 147
2.2.3 Activation energy calculation ............................................................................... 148
3. Kinetic analysis measurement techniques .......................................................................... 149
3.1 Kinetic analysis during cure......................................................................................... 150
3.2 Kinetics of cured samples ............................................................................................ 150
3.2.1 Kinetics of heat exposure...................................................................................... 150
3.3 Kinetics of heat-deformation combined exposure ....................................................... 151
4. Kinetic analysis of mechanochromism ............................................................................... 152
4.1 Kinetics during cure ..................................................................................................... 152

11
4.2 Kinetics in solid polymer ............................................................................................. 153
4.2.1 Heat exposure via water bath................................................................................ 153
4.2.2 Heat exposure after strain – water bath method.................................................... 155
4.2.3 Water bath method – kinetic analysis................................................................... 156
4.2.4 Kinetics of heat exposure – in-situ method........................................................... 159
5. Discussion of Experimental results..................................................................................... 160
5.1 Kinetics during cure ..................................................................................................... 161
5.2 Kinetics in solid DGEBA-DETA................................................................................. 161
5.3 Comparison with Zhurkov model ................................................................................ 163
5.3.1 Kinetics during cure and stoichometric dependence ............................................ 164
5.3.2 Mechanical deformation and hydrostatic stress.................................................... 164
5.3.3 Activation energy.................................................................................................. 165
5.4 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 165
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Works cited................................................................................................................................. 169

12
INTRODUCTION
In this section, the motivation for the current study is introduced – detection of barely visible
impact damage in aerospace polymers and composites using mechanochromic fluorescent
probes. Impact damage in polymers and composites will be introduced, fluorescence imaging
and sensing techniques in polymers and polymer composites will be presented, and a short
review of relevant fluorescence mechanics will be shown. The research approach presented in
this study will be outlined as well.
1. BARELY VISIBLE IMPACT DAMAGE IN POLYMER COMPOSITES
Composite materials have found widespread use in the aerospace and commercial aircraft
industry because of their many advantages in stiffness, strength, and weight when compared to
metals. One area in which composite parts do not perform as well as monolithic metal
structures, however, is in impact damage resistance and detection. Low-energy or low-velocity
impact events in metal parts are generally considered not serious because any impact that causes
significant damage will form a dent on the part surface, and will be easily detected in visual
inspection. In composite parts, however, impact events can cause sub-surface damage and
delaminations, which can reduce part performance, especially compressive strength (1; 2; 3).
The damaged sub-surface areas are often much larger than the impacted surface area. To further
complicate matters, impact events - especially low-velocity impacts such as collisions with
ground vehicles or runway debris on takeoff or landing - do not always leave an easily visible
mark on the surface of a composite part. Such impact events and the damage they cause are
termed Barely Visible Impact Damage (BVID) (2; 4). Because BVID is so difficult to detect in
composites, current industry practice allows BVID to exist on in-service parts and accounts for

13
its mechanical property degradation in safety factor calculations. As a result, many structural
parts are heavier than strictly required, making them less fuel-efficient. A method for rapidly
finding, assessing, and repairing BVID would reduce the required margins of safety and
correspondingly save weight and fuel.
1.1 Ultrasonic NDE methods
Of the currently available NDE methods, those using ultrasonics have enjoyed the most success
in analyzing composite structures (5). These test methods involve propagating mechanical
waves through the part to be tested. The waves displace particles of the material as they travel
through the medium, with typical wave characteristics like amplitude, frequency, and
propagation velocity. Polymer composites as a wave propagating medium are highly complex,
being generally heterogeneous, anisotropic, and found in thin-plate geometries. The most useful
practice for composite has been to restrict wave frequencies to the point where the material can
be treated as homogeneous.
To explore polymer composite material properties a standard technique is to use a transducer to
send an ultrasonic wave pulse through the thickness of the composite part. Test methods are
defined by how the signal is detected – if a transducer opposite the sending transducer on the
opposite side of the part is used, this is called through-thickness transmission or “pitch-catch.” If
the first transducer also receives the signal, this is called the “pulse-echo” method (5; 6).
These techniques have had success measuring part thickness (6), void content (7), various
anisotropic moduli (8), and in the identification of delaminations and disbonding in polymer
composite structures (6; 9; 10). The most successful technique is called C-scanning, which plots
the amplitude of returning pulses against position in the part. Signal scattering is very high in

14
regions of damage, resulting in a high contrast in pulse amplitude. Figure 1 shows an example
of ultrasonic C-scanning detecting a simulated delamination (1; 10).
Ultrasonic C-scanning can detect delaminations and disbonds quite effectively, but it has some
serious drawbacks. The test is time consuming and not suitable for routine inspections of very
large parts. In addition, ultrasonic scanning detects density changes and therefore has difficulty
finding microcracks in the resin and ‘kiss-bonds’ (where two bonded surfaces are in intimate
contact but for some reason the bond between them is weaker than expected). Another drawback
of ultrasonic C-scanning is its lack of in-service part inspection capability. Investigation of used
or damaged parts usually requires removal of the part from the structure. Part removal
incorporates more significant downtime losses into any structure, and may not even be feasible
as more complex part geometries and bonding strategies are developed.
1.2 Project motivation and organization
The motivation for this research project is to contribute to the development of a complementary
technique to the accurate but time-consuming ultrasonic C-scan technique - a method for fast,
accurate BVID detection that can be performed during routine aircraft service. Such a method
Figure 1: Ultrasonic C-scan of delamination damage. From (10).

15
could both quickly establish whether a more extensive inspection is necessary, and guide such
inspection efforts when they do occur. The ability to consistently, accurately, and in a timely
fashion detect and diagnose BVID could mean that part designers would not have to account for
its presence, leading to significant weight savings in future designs.
The approach to this problem is to functionalize the coatings, topcoats, and resins that are
already applied to the surface of the aircraft. Composite aircraft parts have a structural reinforced
epoxy matrix, which is then sprayed with a compatible primer, painted with the airline logo, and
sprayed with a protective topcoat. Coatings, primers, and resins that can change in some
optically detectable manner due to the stress or deformation caused by BVID would be very
useful. Currently, fluorescent molecules have been discovered or designed whose fluorescent
behaviors change in response to external stimuli such as stress or deformation; we have chosen
to attempt to incorporate these dyes into existing aircraft polymers to create a fluorescent sensor
or “witness” coating or resin for BVID detection.
This report discusses research conducted as part of a project funded by the Boeing Company
#BL8DL, which is a collaborative effort between the Boeing Company, the Flinn research group
in the Materials Science & Engineering Department at the University of Washington, and the Jen
research group in the Materials Science & Engineering and Chemistry Departments at the
University of Washington. The Jen group is responsible for design, synthesis, and
characterization of probe molecules. The Flinn group is responsible for incorporation of probe
molecules into aerospace polymers, fabrication and testing of test specimens, and
characterization of probe responses to various external conditions.

16
2. FLUORESCENCE, MECHANOCHROMISM AND RATIOMETRY
In this section a brief introduction to fluorescent probe molecules and their use as sensors in solid
polymeric materials will be outlined. Specific attention will be paid to a specific type of probe
sensor system called ratiometry and the probe features necessary for its use, and to
mechanochromic probes, which are sensitive to mechanical force, deformation, or damage.
2.1 Fluorescence
Fluorescence is an energy transfer mechanism in which a molecule absorbs a photon of some
energy level and, after some internal energy conversions, emits a photon of lower energy. The
wavelengths at which absorption and emission occur, and the efficiency of the absorption and
emission events, are determined by the molecule’s energy gap and charge transfer characteristics.
Both of these are in turn affected by the molecule’s local environment.
When a photon of energy is incident upon a molecule in its ground energy state S0, if the
molecule has an appropriate energy distribution, the molecule can absorb the photon and be
promoted to a higher energy state S2. This state is energetically unstable, and a number of
energy releasing transitions take place rapidly. The molecule often decays via thermal or
electronic rearrangements to some intermediate energy state S1, from which the molecule can
emit a photon of (typically) lower energy than the one it absorbed, a process summarized in Eqn.
1 (11).
→ → → 1

17
This emission is called photoluminescence. There are several types of photoluminescence – the
one this work will focus on is fluorescence. A Jablonski energy diagram showing these
transitions is presented in Figure 2 (12).
While in the excited state S1 the molecule can also interact with other molecules in various ways.
Two well-documented mechanisms are Forster and Dexter energy transfer methods (13). In
Forster energy transfer, the absorbing molecule develops a dipole moment which can induce an
opposite dipole in a nearby molecule. This transition can take place when the distance between
molecules is up to 10nm. Dexter energy transfer occurs when the excited molecule collides with
another molecule. The overlapping molecular orbitals allow transfer of energy between the two.
This method requires a much closer distance between the two molecules – one nanometer or less.
2.2 Fluorescent ratiometric probes
The concept of using fluorescent molecules as sensors is quite widespread, having applications in
biology and environmental science among many other fields. It is relevant to this study that
fluorescent probe molecules have been used quite often in the last 20 years to investigate a
Figure 2: Jablonski Diagram of Photon Absorption and
Fluorescent Emission. From (12).

18
variety of properties of solid polymers. Researchers have identified or designed molecules
whose fluorescent behavior is sensitive to temperature (14), pressure (15), and pH level (16) in
solid polymers. Reference (17) is an excellent review of this work before 1990, while reference
(18) is an updated review from 2010. The fundamental technique involves a fluorescent probe
molecule which emits differently under different local conditions within the solid polymer
matrix.
Simple fluorescent sensors are quite useful for detecting the presence or absence of a quenching
environmental condition by turning ‘ON’ or ‘OFF’, but it is often not possible to gather
quantitative information from this type of sensor. Fluorescence intensity measurements can
depend on factors like local probe concentration, testing geometry, and excitation light source
strength as well as the environmental condition of interest. These other factors often make probe
fluorescence intensity an unreliable quantitative measurement for the environmental condition,
as the change cannot be made a monotonic, one-to-one function of the environmental condition
alone. To combat these problems, fluorescent sensors called ratiometric probes have been
developed which can quantitatively measure the change in an environmental condition. The shift
in a probe’s maximum fluorescent emission wavelength or change in emission intensity due to an
environmental condition can be compared with some other feature which is independent of the
environmental condition of interest. If both emission features vary identically with changes in
concentration or testing procedure, then the ratio is independent of these variables and can often
produce a monotonic, one-to-one curve with the changes in theenvironmental condition of
interest.

19
Ratiometric probes have been used for many years to sense pH and the presence or absence of
various quenching species. One such probe, Indo-1, has become widely used in flow cytometry
as an indicator of the presence of calcium (19). In an environment free of calcium, Indo-1’s
emission spectrum has a maximum at ~485nm. A calcium ion can bind to an Indo-1 molecule,
changing the maximum fluorescence emission of that molecule to ~400nm. Increasing calcium
concentration causes more molecules to be bound and increased emission at 400nm. Figure 3
shows the changing emission spectrum of Indo-1 fluorescent emission due to 338nm excitation
as calcium concentration increases (20).
The ratio of 485nm emission to 400nm emission can be used to develop calibration curves which
allow extremely accurate quantification of the concentration of calcium in a liquid solution.
A more specific subset of ratiometric probe molecules is the dual-emission ratiometric probe. In
these probes, two emitting species are present, one or both of which are sensitive to the quantity
Figure 3: Spectra of Indo-1 calcium indicator probe
molecule in solutions with varying calcium concentration.
From (20).

20
to be sensed. Sensors of this type have been developed to determine pH and detect the
concentration of tryptophan and DNA proteins. These sensors generally display one of two
mechanisms – either a reaction takes place where one fluorescent species changes to another
fluorescent species due to the presence of the sensing quantity (Indo-1 is an example), or one
species’ fluorescence is increasingly quenched by the presence of the sensing quantity while
another species’ fluorescence is unchanged. In these probes, the ratio of the emission intensities
of the two fluorescent species is widely used as the sensing variable for the desired quantity.
An example of the reaction type dual emission ratiometric probe is PYMPON, a pH probe
developed to detect the pH of a solution. A protonation reaction at a pyridine ring on the
molecule causes a shift from a species emitting at 550nm to one at 430nm as pH increases. The
ratio of 550nm to 430nm emission changes monotonically and one-to-one with pH, making
PYMPON a useful pH sensor. Figure 4a shows the spectral change of PYMPON as pH
increases, while Figure 4b shows the change in the ratios of the two peaks as pH increases (21).
Figure 4: Ratiometric pH probe PYMPON behavior with increasing pH - a) emission spectra and b) ratio of
emission peaks. From (21).

21
An example of the quenching-type dual-emission ratiometric probe has been developed by Zhu
et.al. which combines graphene oxide with CdTe quantum dots to produce a ratiometric probe
sensitive to iron concentrations. The presense of iron has little effect on the fluorescence of
graphene oxide, but is a strong quencher for CdTe quantum dot fluorescence. The combination
of these two effects creates a very sensitive ratiometric system which uses the ratio of the
fluorescent emission of the two species as a measurement of Fe2+
/Fe3+
concentration. Figure 5
shows the change in emission spectra of the hybrid probe, with the ratio of the probe emission
intensities in the inset (22).
In dual emission ratiometric probes, a measurement of the quantity to be sensed is often
calibrated using the ratio of the two emission peak intensities. A plot of this intensity ratio, as in
Figure 4b and the inset of Figure 5, is called a modified Stern-Volmer plot. The quantity plotted
Figure 5: Graphene oxide-quantum dot hybrid dual emission ratiometric probe
emission with increasing Fe concentration. inset - ratio of emission intensities. From
(22).

22
is often the ratio of the peak intensities normalized by the ratio when no quencher is present.
With quantities gathered into a simple arrangement, the modified Stern Volmer relationship is
[ ]
2
Where I0s are the initial intensities of fluorescent species a and b, Is are the intensities at a
given quencher concentration, kq is the Stern-Volmer quenching coefficient, τ0 is the fluorescent
lifetime, and [Q] is the concentration of quenching species (23).
2.3 Fluorescent mechanochromic probes
Mechanochromism is a term that defines a color change in a material due to mechanical
grinding, crushing, milling, pressure, or sonification (24). In this study the term will be used to
describe a change in fluorescent behavior of a probe molecule – that is, a change in the
absorbance, excitation or emission of light by a probe in response to mechanical stimulus.
Mechanochromism in polymers is a phenomenon that has been identified and studied only
relatively recently; the first papers discussing mechanochromism in poly(diacetylene) and
poly(3-alkylthiophene) began appearing in the late 1980s (25; 26). Current research has
identified polymer systems with intrinsic mechanochromic behavior as well as polymers with
mechanochromic probe molecules incorporated in a variety of ways. Chapter 2 will present a
more in-depth review of mechanochromic polymer systems.
3. RESEARCH PLAN
The overall project’s goals are to develop a system of aerospace resins and coatings suitable for
detecting mechanical and thermal damage to aerospace composite parts.

23
The project has recently developed a series of probe molecules that show mechanochromic
response to deformation in a solid epoxy polymer system. Two of these probes, labeled
AJNDE15 and AJNDE17, will be studied extensively in this research study. The goal of this
particular research is to understand fully the behavior of these probe molecules in the epoxy
system. Specifically, this dissertation will present efforts to identify the activation mechanism
for the probe mechanochromic response; quantify the kinetics of the mechanochromism; and put
forward a model for the molecular interactions that govern the probes’ mechanochromic
response.
3.1 Document organization
The preceding sections have introduced the project motivation – improving the detection
capability of damage in aerospace composites; the approach – functionalize aerospace polymers
with mechanochromic fluorescent probe molecules; and the goals of this dissertation – to
understand the mechanochromic response of probe molecules AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 in
epoxy.
The rest of the document will be organized into 3 chapters. Chapter 1 will present the epoxy
system in which mechanochromism will be studied, and show relevant research describing the
characterization of this system. Chapter 2 will discuss the mechanisms by which
mechanochromism could occur, and present research that attempts to identify the mechanism by
which AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 display mechanochromism. Chapter 3 will present research into
the kinetics of the mechanochromic response, and discuss possible models to explain the
molecular interactions responsible for the mechanochromism.

24
CHAPTER 1
CHARACTERIZATION OF EPOXY POLYMER SYSTEM
1. INTRODUCTION
In this section the epoxy and curing agent used to produce the structural matrix in this research
will be identified and discussed. The relevant mechanical, optical, and thermal properties will be
presented, as well as the responses these properties display in relation to the variables most
important to this study.
1.1 Epoxy and curing agent
1.1.1 Epoxy - DGEBA
The epoxy used for this study is Di-Glycidyl Ether of Bisphenol-A (DGEBA), a basic epoxide
that is often used as a model epoxy system. DGEBA has 2 reactive epoxide sites and few
opportunities for competing reactions available along its main chain. The main chain’s benzene
rings add stiffness to the network structure, improving its mechanical properties. Figure 6 has a
Figure 6: a) DGEBA molecule, ideal structure. b) DGEBA commercial structure.
a)
b
)

25
chemical diagram of the DGEBA structure, while Table 1 gives its relevant properties.
For this study, the DGEBA used comes from two sources - Epon 828 (Shell Chemical Co., local
distributor Miller-Stephenson) and DER 330 (Dow Chemical Co.). In commercial form,
DGEBA has some impurities that are shown as repeat units in Figure 6b.
Table 1: DGEBA Properties.
Molecular weight, ideal (g/mol) 340
EEW*, ideal (g/mol) 170
Molecular weight, commercial (g/mol) 354-384
EEW*, commercial (g/mol) 177-192
Viscosity, cps (25 deg C) 11000 – 15000
Density, g/c.c. ** 1.2-1.3
* = epoxide equivalent weight. **=approx. amine-cured properties.
1.1.2 Curing agent - DETA
Diethylene Triamine (DETA) is a commonly used curing agent for epoxides. It has 5 amino
hydrogens, 4 primary and 1 secondary, available to form bonds with epoxide groups. DETA’s
chemical structure is shown in Figure 7, with relevant properties given in Table 2.
Figure 7: DETA chemical structure.

26
For this study, the DETA used is Epikure 3223 (Shell Chemical Co., local dist. Miller-
Stephenson). It is used as received.
Table 2: DETA properties.
Molecular weight (g/mol) 103.5
Wt. per amino H (g/mol) 20.7
Viscosity, cps (20 deg C) 10
Density, g/cc 0.95
1.2 Curing of DGEBA-DETA
There are four main curing reactions for epoxide-amine polymerization. The first is a ring-
opening reaction in which the epoxide reacts with a primary amino hydrogen to form a partially
crosslinked site with a secondary amine still available for bonding, and an –OH group. The
epoxide can also react with a secondary amino hydrogen to form a fully crosslinked site with two
hydroxyl groups remaining. A third reaction is the etherification reaction of epoxide and –OH
groups. This reaction is less desirable because the crosslink site is not as rigid with only two
bonds; etherification generally occurs only at high temperature and can be avoided with careful
cure control. The fourth reaction, epoxide homopolymerization, is also undesirable because it
produces a less than ideal crosslink site. Homopolymerization also requires high temperatures
and an excess of epoxides, and can be avoided with care. Figure 8 summarizes these reactions.

27
The cure reaction of epoxy is highly exothermic and forms a 3-dimensional network of crosslink
sites. The reaction proceeds rapidly until a gelation point when the network becomes rigid
enough that unreacted epoxides and amino hydrogens can no longer easily reach one another. At
this point, the glass transition temperature of the bulk sample is set. Curing after this point is
controlled by diffusion and is much slower than the rapid autocatalytic reaction before the
c)
Figure 8: Reactions involved in curing of epoxy with amines. a)primary amine with epoxide. b) secondary
amine with epoxide. c) etherification. d) homopolymerization.
a)
b)
d)

28
gelation point. Samples may or may not be fully cured when this Tg is developed; in fact, Tg is
very often lower than Tg∞, the ultimate glass transition temperature reached when an epoxy
network is completely cured.
1.3 Room temperature cured DGEBA-DETA
DGEBA-DETA can be cured at a wide range of temperatures, with corresponding variation in
network structure and cure extent. For this study we have cured DGEBA-DETA at room
temperature to avoid potential temperature related complications with mechanochromic probe
molecules. The cure takes 24 hours. At room temperature DGEBA-DETA does not reach its
full cure extent; that is, every epoxide molecule is not reacted with an available amino hydrogen
site. Because of this, the glass transition of RT DGEBA-DETA is much lower than the ultimate
glass transition. There is also a significant percentage of crosslinks that are not completely
fulfilled. This has ramifications which will be discussed as they become relevant.
In an effort to learn more about the behavior of the mechanochromic probes in DGEBA-DETA
this project initially studies the change in response of the probes to changes in the bulk epoxy.
The most important of these for the overall project goal is the probe response to mechanical
deformation. We will use fluorescent measurements to evaluate our probe molecules. To
properly attribute changes in the fluorescent spectra we measure to probe behavior, we must first
understand the mechanical behavior of DGEBA-DETA itself. This will be reviewed in section
1.4. The optical properties of DGEBA-DETA, and any changes due to mechanical deformation,
will be quantified to help us properly attribute changes in fluorescence to probe behavior.
To understand the fundamental mechanism by which our probes activate, however, more
information must be gathered. Two other conditions that are easily applied that can contribute a

29
great deal of information are the temperature exposure after curing and the stoichiometry of the
pre-cured mixture. The amine-to-epoxide ratio χ is a simple variable to change that can cause a
wide range of different thermal properties in the bulk polymer. Temperature exposure can cause
increased curing and can enhance molecular chain motion, as well as any reaction kinetics that
are temperature-dependent. More details on these will be presented as they become relevant.
1.4 Mechanical deformation of epoxy polymers
In this section a review of the mechanical properties of epoxy that are relevant to this study will
be presented. Discussion will focus on the stress-strain behavior of epoxy in the glassy state,
which is the most important temperature region for the application.
Researchers have studied the response of epoxy polymers to mechanical deformation in great
detail since the 1950s. Their mechanical behavior is best understood by first dividing the
behavior by temperature – the response is much different when above the glass transition
temperature (Tg) than it is when below. In this study, mechanical deformations are performed at
room temperature, which is below the Tg of room-temperature cured DGEBA-DETA (see
section 2.2.1). Under these conditions, epoxy exhibits behavior similar to glassy amorphous
polymers with only small differences (27; 28; 29). This discussion will present the response of
glassy amorphous polymers to mechanical loading, and point out areas where epoxy differs from
these responses.
The stress-strain curve is a good starting point for discussion of the response of glassy
amorphous polymers below Tg. A generic stress-strain curve for glassy amorphous polymers in
mechanical deformation is given in Figure 9.

30
This curve is consistently displayed by samples in both tension and compression, and for various
strain states, with small differences that will be discussed. The predominant features are
identified in the plot – the elastic region (A), the yield strength (B), the post-yield or strain
softening region (C), and the strain hardening region (D). The responses in these regions at the
molecular and polymer chain level are of interest to this study, and the current understanding of
these phenomena is discussed below.
1.4.1 Elastic deformation
The initial response of a glassy amorphous polymer to a mechanical load is linear elastic, like
many materials. The elastic modulus E characterizes this response. Most glassy amorphous
polymers have modulus values of 2-4 GPa when tested at temperatures well below Tg. This value
is independent of the rigidity of the polymer repeat unit, degree of crosslinking, or entanglement
frequency, and is two orders of magnitude below the observed resistance to stretching of a
covalent C-C bond. The modulus of a glassy amorphous polymer has been shown to depend
strongly on the density of the polymer, however (30; 31). These observations have led
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4
TrueStress(MPa)
True Strain
Figure 9: Example stress-strain plot of glassy polymer in compression.
A
C D
B

31
researchers to the conclusion that the resistance to deformation in the elastic region comes
primarily from secondary intermolecular interactions between chains such as Van der Waals
interactions, and not from stretching of primary bonds (30; 31).
The elastic deformation ends at the yield point (εyield, σyield) of the glassy amorphous polymer.
For most glassy polymers σyield can reach a maximum of appromimately 150MPa, and varies
with the testing temperature’s proximity respect to Tg. Comparison of σyield with the theoretical
fracture strength of a C-C bond within the polymer chain shows that glassy polymers yield at
stresses much lower than required to break a C-C bond. Again, this is evidence that the elastic
deformation of glassy polymers is ‘dominated by the deformation of secondary bonds’ (30).
1.4.2 Yielding and post-yield behavior
After the polymer has been loaded with a stress above σyield, inelastic deformation begins. The
strain produced after εyield persists after the load is removed, while the elastic strains are
instantaneously recovered. We shall refer to the strain after the yield point as deformation strain,
εdef. These strains can occur at constant volume, or can be accompanied by small increases in
volume, depending on the mechanism by which they develop. The two most important processes
responsible for polymer inelastic deformation are yielding and craze formation. The type of
process involved depends heavily on the structure of the polymer at the molecular level. Figure
10 shows a plot of the process involved in plastic deformation of crosslinked polystyrene –
crazing or yielding - for various levels of crosslinking (ν, the x-axis) (32).

32
Samples deform exclusively via crazing at low crosslinking, and exclusively via yielding at high
crosslinking. In epoxies, the crosslink density is generally so high that it must be reduced in
some way to allow yielding to occur before fracture (32; 33). Crazing processes therefore will
not be considered further in this work.
In metals and crystalline materials, yielding occurs via nucleation, growth, and motion of
dislocations. The dislocation framework was not attractive to resarchers attempting to model
polymer yielding at first; the prevailing theory for many years was that coiled structures within
the chains were straightening in response to load (34; 35). However, many experiments have
shown that in glassy polymers below Tg, chain uncoiling is the dominant process only at the very
last stages of deformation, during strain hardening. The current understanding of plastic
deformation shows that εdef is produced by the nucleation and motion of short-scale shear
Figure 10: Determination of inelastic deformation process in crosslinked/entangled polystyrene. From
(32).

33
defects, referred to variously as ‘local shears’ (34), plastic shear defects (PSDs) (36),
deformation zones (DZs) (33), or shear transformations (STs) (34).
Imaging of shear defects in polymers has not been as successful as dislocation imaging in metals;
however, theoretical studies and computer simulations of disordered structures have produced an
accurate picture of their development and motion under stress. Figure 11 has an image of the
rearrangement of polymer chains in shear. The ‘permanent’ nature of the shape change
associated with plastic deformation suggests that some secondary bonding which was present in
the initial conformation has re-formed in the post yielding conformation.
A visualization of shear defect motion in loading is in the inset of Figure 12 (34). Localized
regions of high shear can both expand during loading, and change position relative to the bulk
polymer. Both processes are based in movement of chains relative to one another, called
intermolecular motion in this work.
Force
Figure 11: Sketch of shear deformation in adjacent polymer chains. From (27).

34
1.4.3 Unloading and recovery
It is well-known that after yielding, if the load on a sample is removed, the sample returns to a
state of no stress via a path with the same slope as the elastic modulus, but to a point of non-zero
strain εdef. Figure 13 has an example of the loading and unloading of polystyrene tested in
uniaxial compression, with arrows pointing out the value of εdef after unloading.
Figure 12: Shear Transformations (STs) motion under loading. From (34).
Figure 13: Loading and unloading stress-strain curves
of polystyrene in uniaxial compression. From (36).
εdef

35
The strain remaining after unloading, εdef, is a more complicated quantity in glassy polymers than
it is in metallic or other crystalline materials. In metals, careful heating of a deformed sample
can return it to its original ductility by annihilation of dislocations (37). But the dimension
change is permanent below the melting point of the metal. In polymers, however, samples can
conditionally recover some or all of the change in dimension they have experienced as well
depending on the amount of deformation and the temperature and duration of the heat treatment
after deformation. The quantity εdef in polymers consists of the sum of two types of strain, called
anelastic strain (εan) and plastic strain (εpl), as in Eqn. 3.
3
Current understanding of plastic deformation in glassy polymers holds that εan results from the
nucleation and growth of shear defects. After some deformation, εpl begins to occur when a
sufficient concentration of shear defects has been produced. The shear defects coalesce and
annihilate, allowing secondary bonds to form between chains at their new positions. The
Figure 14: strain recovery curves for glassy amine cured epoxy. curve 1) εdef =.04. curve
2) εdef = .11. curve 3) εdef = .09. curve 4) εdef = .12 curve 5) εdef = .045. From (36).

36
recovery behavior of glassy polymers illustrates this more clearly. Figure 14 shows the strain
recovery of samples of amine-cured epoxy during a temperature scan after varying levels of εdef.
Samples clearly shows two different recovery events – one that occurs below Tg, and one that
occurs above Tg (140°C for the system in Figure 14). The low temperature recovery is the
recovery of εan, which can occur at times as low as 1hr when thermal exposure is within (Tg -
20°C). Recovery of εpl, due to the formation of new secondary bonds, is not possible until
samples are heated above Tg, analogous with the re-melting of deformed metals.
Based on the magnitudes of recovery events, the progress of εan and εpl have been tracked in the
glassy amorphous polymer PMMA (38). Figure 15 shows the quantities of elastic strain (εel), εan,
and εpl as the total strain εdef increases. The stress strain curve is also plotted in the figure for
Figure 15: Components of εdef during deformation of PMMA. Open circles – εel. Closed
squares – εan. Closed circles – εpl. From (38).

37
comparison.
The components of strain show differing behavior as loading progresses. The anelastic strain εan
begins growing almost simultaneously with loading, and grows during elastic deformation,
yielding, and post-yielding; it reaches a maximum at approximately the onset of strain hardening.
The plastic strain εpl, however, does not begin to appear until just after εyield and then grows
linearly through post yield deformation and strain hardening, presumably continuing to increase
until failure.
1.4.4 Yielding, post-yielding, and energy considerations
The stress-strain curve in Figure 13 demonstrates that the dimension change of a glassy polymer
sample deformed past εyield is ‘permanent.’ This means that work has been done on the sample,
Figure 16: DSC curves of polystyrene - 1) undeformed. 2) ε= .10 3)
ε= .20 4) hydrostatic pressure 10kbar. From (36).

38
and a consideration of the yield behavior in terms of energy naturally follows. Studies of
samples before and after deformation using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and
deformation calorimetry have produced very informative results (27; 29; 34; 36).
Figure 16 shows a DSC scan of samples of undeformed atactic polystyrene (a-PS), a-PS after
deformation in uniaxial tension, and a-PS after exposure to hydrostatic pressure of 10kbar (36).
The increasing strain in the samples causes an increase in the exotherm given off by the sample
when heated. This indicates a buildup of energy within the sample through some mechanism.
The exotherm increases with increasing strain, and the energy is given off at temperatures
approaching but below Tg (~90°C for a-PS). Hydrostatic pressure causes no increase in the
exotherm.
Figure 17: Curves of energy associated with glassy polymer deformation.
1) Mechanical work of deformation. 2) Heat of deformation 3) Internal
energy stored by sample. From (36).

39
Figure 17 shows a plot of the various kinds of energy involved in the deformation of a glassy
amorphous polymer, with the stress-strain curve plotted in the inset for reference.
Curve 1 shows the mechanical work of deformation Adef (curve 1), determined by the area under
the stress strain curve
∫ 4
Curve 2 is the heat of deformation, measured by deformation calorimetry. Curve 3 in Figure 17
shows the amount of energy stored by the sample, ΔUdef, the difference between Adef and Qdef
5
This quantity agrees very well with exothermic measurements like those in Figure 16. The
amount of energy stored in inelastically deformed polymers begins increasing immediately, and
reaches a maximum at strains of εdef =.15-.25 after which it remains constant. The behavior of
ΔUdef as εdef increases compares very well with the behavior of εan (see Figure 15), as does the
observation that liberation of ΔUdef appears in DSC measurements at temperatures approaching
but below Tg. Many researchers now consider the buildup of ΔUdef and the increase in εan to be
indicators of the nucleation and growth of the local shear defects responsible for plastic
deformation. The increased disorder immediately surrounding the defect accounts for ΔUdef in a
manner roughly analogous to strain energy buildup around dislocations in metals (37).
Hydrostatic pressure, which applies only dilatational stress components with no shear terms,
causes no increase in ΔUdef, further supporting the shear defect- ΔUdef connection. This
hypothesis also suggests that the coalescence of shear defects that occurs at large εdef, which is
responsible for producing εpl, does not cause increased internal energy storage. The

40
concentration of shear defects has reached the point where coalescence occurs at the same rate as
nucleation, making increases in εpl energy-neutral.
A plot of ΔUdef for various materials is shown in Figure 18 (36). Curve 1 in this plot shows the
internal energy stored by an amine cured epoxy during deformation. The onset of energy storage
does not begin immediately but at some non-zero value εdef ~.05-.10. Epoxy stores the largest
amount of energy of the tested glassy polymers, reaching a plateau of ~15 J/kg at the highest εdef
shown. The internal energy also does not reach a perfect plateau in epoxy, continuing to increase
but more slowly as εdef increases above .30.
1.4.5 Strain hardening
The earlier model of plastic deformation involved the uncoiling of coiled macromolecular
chains. This model is now considered to be inaccurate in the early stages of post yield
Figure 18: internal stored energy for various polymers. 1) amine-
cured epoxy. 2) a-PS. 3) PC. 4) PMMA. 5) a-PET. From (36).

41
deformation, where εdef largely consists of εan and is associated with nucleation and growth of
shear defects between chains rather than chain extension. It is only after significant deformation
has already taken place that chains begin to extend and align, bringing the stronger C-C bonds
into play in resisting deformation. The coalescence of shear defects and re-formation of
secondary bonding between chains also contribute to the increased stiffness.
Experimental data and theoretical studies using a variety of chain-based models have established
that the amount of strain hardening experienced in a glassy amorphous polymer increases as the
density of crosslinks increases (39; 40; 41). The strain hardening phenomenon is also dependent
on the strain state of the sample, with strain hardening occurring at lower strains when samples
are loaded in plane strain compression than when loaded in uniaxial compression (42).
1.4.6 Comparison of epoxy to general amorphous glassy polymers
As noted previously, epoxy mechanical deformation is qualitatively very similar to most other
glassy amorphous polymers (27; 28; 29). The highly crosslinked network structure plays little
role in elastic deformation and yielding, which are dominated by effects from interchain
secondary bonding. The large crosslink density of epoxies has one large effect - it increases Tg
to very high temperatures for fully cured materials, allowing their mechanical response to remain
glassy at higher temperatures than most other glassy amorphous polymers. As discussed in
Chapter 1 section 1.4.2, crosslinking determines the plastic deformation process, with highly
crosslinked epoxies displaying yielding deformation predominantly. Other subtle effects of
crosslinking are to increase εyield slightly compared to non-crosslinked polymers (33), and to
increase the magnitude of strain hardening experienced at high strains (27) (43).

42
1.5 Summary
When solid epoxy is loaded at a temperature well below its Tg, it responds in a manner very
similar to other glassy amorphous polymers. The stress strain curve of epoxy deformation shows
four predominant features – the elastic region, the yield point, the post-yield/strain softening
region, and the strain hardening region. The elastic region has been associated with the
deformation of secondary, Van der Waals-type bonding between polymer chains. Yielding
occurs when these secondary bonds begin to break. The post-yield region is characterized by
large deformation strains in the sample εdef through yielding, which is currently understood to
take place via nucleation and growth of shear defects and motion of chains relative to one
another rather than chain alignment or uncoiling. These processes are accompanied by an
increase in the anelastic strain εan beginning at initial loading and reaching a plateau around εdef
=.20. After sufficient shear defects have formed, they can coalesce and re-form secondary
interchain bonds, which correspond with the plastic strain εpl beginning after yielding and
increasing until failure. DSC scans have measured an increase in stored internal energy ΔUdef
during yielding, roughly corresponding with shear defect formation and εan. Recovery of εan can
occur in hours if samples are heated to (Tg -20°C), while temperatures above Tg are required to
recover εpl. The strain hardening region is characterized by major stiffening of the sample
response to load, and has been associated with stretching or uncoiling of polymer chains. In
many glassy polymers this process does not add ΔUdef, however in epoxy it appears to continue
increasing slightly as εdef increases into the strain hardening region.

43
2. CHARACTERIZATION METHODS
In this section the methods used to characterize the DGEBA-DETA system will be presented.
The procedure used to cure DGEBA-DETA and the instruments used to characterize the cure
process will be introduced. After cure, the methods used to characterize the mechanical, thermal,
and optical properties will be presented.
2.1 Characterization of cure
The DGEBA-DETA system is a useful one for this study for many reasons, one of which is that
it can be cured at room temperature. This eliminates several problems associated with high-
temperature cured systems.
DGEBA and DETA at room temperature are medium- and low-viscosity liquids. To produce
samples for continued study, the liquids are mixed at the appropriate stoichiometric ratio until no
phase separation is visible. To remove any bubbles introduced during mixing, the liquid mixture
is held under vacuum for ~5 minutes, after which the liquid is poured into 63mm aluminum
sample weighing dishes for curing. The cure reaction at room temperature is exothermic, but
with χ=1 and at the batch sizes involved in this study the reaction causes negligible temperature
increase.
Samples were characterized during cure using standard techniques including Differential
Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), UV-Visible absorbance spectroscopy, and Fourier Transform
Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR).

44
2.1.1 Differential Scanning Calorimetry
The standard technique for DSC cure characterization of epoxy is based on the heat of reaction
evolved during cure, ΔHrxn. A dynamic DSC scan measures the heat evolved or absorbed by a
sample as temperature increases at a controlled rate. After scanning to a temperature sufficient
to complete all curing reactions, the DSC’s signal can be integrated to measure ΔHrxn
∫ 6
This is taken as a baseline value, to which samples of variable cure states can be compared. A
dynamic DSC measurement identical to the one used to determine ΔHrxn can be performed on
partially cured samples to measure the residual heat of reaction, ΔHres. The final degree of cure,
αfinal, is then that portion of the heat of reaction that is not accounted for in the residual heat of
reaction:
7
The glass transition temperature Tg can also be determined from a dynamic DSC scan. The
temperature at which molecular chain motion begins to be thermally allowed is characterized by
an inflection point in the heat evolution signal. After partial or full curing, Tg is easily detected
by analysis software (44).
To establish ΔHrxn, immediately after mixing, small amounts (5-15mg) of uncured epoxy-amine
liquid were weighed and placed in aluminum DSC pans (Netzsch Instruments 6.239.2 – 64.50X).
Samples were loaded into a Netzsch DSC-200 with a Netzsch TASC 414/3 controller (Netzsch
Instruments, Burlington, MA). Samples were heated in dynamic DSC measurements to 250o
C at

45
a heating rate of 5°C/min under inert gas atmospheres. After the measurement, the samples were
cooled with forced air. A second identical DSC measurement was performed to establish Tg∞
and ensure no residual cure was present.
Evaluation of samples cured in bulk was performed by sectioning the bulk sample and punching
a small disk out of a thin sheet. The disk was placed in a DSC pan and heated, cooled, and
heated again as above. The ∆Hres was measured by integration as in eqn. 6.
Dynamic DSC data was analyzed using Proteus Thermal Analaysis software (Netzsch
Instruments, Burlington, MA).
2.1.2 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
To investigate the chemical changes occurring during cure, Fourier Transform Infrared
spectroscopy (FTIR) was used. Measurements of DGEBA-DETA during cure were measured
with a Bruker Vector 70 FTIR, using a GladiATR diamond ATR accessory (Pike Technologies,
Madison, WI). Uncured DGEBA-DETA mixtures were placed on the ATR with a dropper and
allowed to cure for 24hr. The FTIR spectrum was collected every 30 min during the cure
process. To analyze the spectra, the area under the epoxide’s characteristic absorbance peak at
917cm-1
, A917(t), was used as a measure of the epoxide groups remaining at a time t. The
integrated value was normalized by the initial value of the absorbance integral, which can be
related to the degree of cure α(t) in equation 8:
∫
∫
8
The rate of cure for different samples can be compared by observing the slope of the α(t)
curve before the onset of diffusion control. The final degree of cure of a sample, αfinal, can be

46
determined from the maximum value of α(t) reached during cure. The method has been used
successfully to monitor cure reactions and explore the effects of variables such as cure
temperature, stoichiometry, and curing agent molecular structure in other works (45; 46; 47).
2.1.3 Absorbance
Absorbance measurements on solid samples were performed on a ThermoScientific Evolution
300 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). For liquid samples, plastic
cuvettes containing uncured DGEBA-DETA-probe mixture were placed in the UV-Vis
absorbance beam path and allowed to cure. Absorbance spectra were collected at appropriate
time intervals (every 30 minutes for most mixtures) for the duration of the cure process (24hr for
most mixtures). Baseline absorbance was taken on an identical plastic cuvette filled with
unmixed DGEBA.
2.2 Characterization of solid epoxy polymer
This section details the characterization of the DGEBA-DETA after curing. The glass transition
temperature and relevant mechanical and optical properties will be characterized using DSC,
DMA, UV-Vis absorbance, and mechanical deformation techniques. Baseline values for these
properties are established for as cured samples with χ=1. The changes in these properties due to
variations in thermal exposure , χ, and εdef will be presented.
2.2.1 Glass transition temperature
The glass transition temperature is an extremely important property of a polymer that defines the
temperatures where glassy response to loading occurs, along with associated behaviors such as

47
recovery. The dynamic DSC measurements described in section 2.1.1 give one measurement of
Tg, but another measurement method is Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA).
DMA is a widely accepted method for determining the glass transition temperature Tg of
polymers and polymer composites. The glass transition temperature of a sample was determined
using method 1 described in ASTM E1640 (48) – the intersection of tangent lines to the storage
modulus E’ curve taken above and below the onset of the transition. Tg data can also be
measured at the peaks of the loss modulus E’’or tan δ curves; Tg from E’ data is typically lower
than Tg reported from E’’ or tan  data.
Rectangular samples were tested in 3-point bend configuration in a PerkinElmer DMA 7e
instrument (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Inc., Waltham, MA). An initial force of
500 mN was applied; force oscillation of 400mN was then conducted at a rate of 1Hz.
Temperature was increased at a rate of 5°C/min, and oscillation amplitude was measured. Data
was collected and analyzed in Pyris v.6.0.0.33 software.
2.2.2 Mechanical properties
Understanding the mechanical response of DGEBA-DETA to loading is vital to understanding
the mechanochromic behavior of probe molecules. Certain defining properties and regions must
be established for DGEBA-DETA using uniaxial compression and hydrostatic pressure testing.
After deformation, the recovery response of DGEBA-DETA is also tested.
2.2.2.1 Sample preparation
After curing, samples were machined on a low speed saw (Pace Technologies PICO150, Tuscon,
AZ) with a wafering blade of low-concentration poly-crystalline diamond, cooled by a water

48
bath. Samples were machined to form flat square specimens with dimensions approx. 5mm x
5mm x 1mm.
2.2.2.2 Uniaxial Compression Testing
Samples were deformed in compression in an Instron 5500R test frame (Instron, Norwood, MA)
at a rate of .1mm/min. For modulus measurements, samples were loaded to slightly past the
yield point of the stress strain curve, and then unloaded at .1mm/min. Modulus calculations were
performed on the unloading curve to avoid sample alignment variation and the elastic toe region
of the stress-strain curve. Yield strength was calculated using the maximum stress level of the
stress-strain curve.
For varying εdef testing, samples were loaded to a single value of εdef at .1mm/min before being
unloaded rapidly. A single sample was loaded only to one εdef value before subsequent testing,
and was not loaded again.
2.2.2.3 Recovery Testing
To evaluate post-yield recovery behavior, a series of samples were tested to varying levels of
εdef, approximately every .05 εdef, after which samples were unloaded and their dimensions
measured to determine εan and εpl. Samples were then placed in a drying oven at 70°C (~Tg +
10°C) to allow recovery processes to occur on a time scale convenient for observation. Sample
dimensions were measured at 1hr, 3hr, and 24hr after initial temperature exposure. No additional
recovery was observed beyond 1hr of exposure.

49
2.2.2.4 Hydrostatic Pressure Testing
For hydrostatic pressure testing, samples were machined into prisms approximately
5mmx5mmx7mm. Samples were then loaded with hydrostatic pressure in a cold isostatic press
(MTI Corp. CIP-15, Richmond, CA) to varying pressures. Samples were loosely enclosed in
aluminum foil and submerged directly in the hydraulic fluid, after which pressure was applied.
Three samples were loaded to 77 MPa, 232 MPa, and 349 MPa. After loading samples were
removed from the pressure chamber, hydraulic fluid was cleaned from the samples and
subsequent testing was carried out.
2.2.3 Optical properties
The mechanochromic response of probe molecules will be measured optically using absorbance,
excitation, and fluorescent emission spectroscopy. It is therefore important to measure the
behavior of DGEBA-DETA using these techniques to establish responses that are due to the
epoxy itself rather than the probe molecule. The techniques and instruments used to perform
these characterizing experiments will be presented in this section.
2.2.3.1 Absorbance
For solid samples, absorbance characterization was performed in a similar manner to liquid
samples (see Chapter 1 section 2.1.3). Samples were machined just as for mechanical testing and
were placed free standing in the beam path. Spectra were compared to baseline spectra taken
with no sample in the beam path. Absorbance spectra were often corrected for varying sample
thicknesses by offsetting the absorbance at 850nm to 0 A.

50
2.2.3.2 Excitation and emission
The excitation and emission spectra of solid DGEBA-DETA samples were collected in a Perkin
Elmer LS-50B Fluorimeter (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). Fluorescence from solid samples
was obtained by sectioning samples ~1.0mm thick with appropriate dimensions to fit into 10mm
quartz cuvettes at an angle of ~45° to the beam path. Samples were loaded into the cuvette in
such a manner that any reflection of the excitation light would occur away from the detector
path. Figure 19 has a schematic of the sample alignment.
Excitation and emission spectra were collected iteratively by collecting an initial emission
spectrum, then collecting an excitation spectrum corresponding to the peak emission wavelength,
then collecting a subsequent emission spectrum corresponding to the peak excitation wavelength.
Spectra will be normalized at the peak excitation and emission wavelengths in comparison plots
such as the one in Figure 30.
Figure 19: Schematic of solid sample excitation-emission
measurements.

51
2.2.3.3 In situ emission
Fluorescent emission spectra of samples during in-situ testing and for sample geometries not
convenient for fluorimeter testing were collected with a Stellarnet Blue-WAVE UVN miniature
spectrometer and Y-type ‘7-around-1’ fiber optic probe (Stellarnet US, Inc., Tampa, FL).
Excitation light was carried by 7 exterior optical fibers from an LED single-wavelength source
(SL1-LED, Stellarnet US, Inc.) to the illumination site. Emission spectra were collected by a
single 600µm optical fiber, within the bundle of exterior fibers. The probe configuration ensures
that excitation and emission occur from the same small sample location. The probe tip was held
at a 45°angle to the sample surface to minimize excitation light backscatter being detected by the
emission probe. A schematic of the setup is shown in Figure 20a, with an image in Figure 20b.
The probe tip and sample area were enclosed in a double layer of thick black cloth to remove
ambient light, and spectra were compared to a baseline of the sample with no illumination from
the source.
Excitation light
Fluorescent Emission
LED
sourc
e
sample
probe
Detector
Figure 20: a) spectrometer schematic. b) Image of spectrometer probe tip and sample configuration.
a) b)

52
2.2.3.4 Fluorescent Imaging
To display visually the changes in fluorescent response, images of the samples were taken.
Images were taken with a Canon PowerShot Elph 100HS camera mounted on a small tripod.
Brightfield images were taken against a white background. Fluorescent images were taken in a
darkroom against a dark background, using a 15sec shutter exposure. The samples were
illuminated by hand with the long wave setting of a UVSL-14P UV Lamp (UVP, Upland, CA).
3. DGEBA-DETA DURING CURE
This section will present the results of characterization of DGEBA-DETA during cure using the
techniques presented in Chapter 1 section 2.1. The changes in cure caused by changing the
amine-to-epoxide ratio χ will also be presented in this section.
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
40 90 140 190 240
DSC(mW/mg)
Temperature (degC)
curing
after RT cure
after RT cure and
DSC
Figure 21: DGEBA-DETA curing exotherm (blue), exotherm after RT cure (red), and after
complete cure (green).
Tg∞Tg

53
3.1 DSC cure characterization
Figure 21 shows the dynamic DSC analysis curves of DGEBA-DETA with χ=1 during heating to
250C, with the curing reaction in blue, the residual reaction after the 24hr RT cure cycle in red,
and the curve after the RT cure and DSC heating to 250ºC in green.
The DSC measurement after RT cure shows that this cure cycle does not complete the cure
reaction, and the glass transition temperature at 62.6 ± .75ºC is clearly visible. After the first
DSC measurement, a second DSC measurement shows no exothermic behavior, and Tg∞ of the
material is visible at 132ºC. DSC analysis of the areas under the curve allows an approximate
estimate of the degree of cure of DGEBA-DETA at αfinal ~.67 from equation 7.
3.1.1 Effect of stoichiometry
The stoichiometry is one of the most fundamental determining factors in DGEBA-DETA’s
thermal characteristics. The network structure is highly affected by the amine-to- epoxide ratio
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
0.5 1 1.5 2
DegreeofCure
Amine to epoxide ratio, χ
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0.5 1 1.5 2
Temperature(degC)
Tg after RT cure
Tg ultimate
Figure 22: a) Degree of cure for DGEBA-DETA cured at RT with varying χ value. b) Tg and ultimate Tg
of RT cured DGEBA-DETA with χ values.
a) b)

54
χ, with excess epoxides leaving unreacted or partially reacted epoxide monomers either unbound
or partially bound to the network, and excess amines resulting in less-than-optimum crosslinking
sites and primary or secondary amines unfulfilled. The effects that changing χ have on DGEBA-
DETA are described by Figure 22a and b, which show the αfinal after RT cure and Tg and Tg∞.
Figure 22a shows that room temperature curing of DGEBA-DETA does not result in complete
conversion of epoxides at χ≤1.1. As amine content increases above χ=1.1, the αfinal approaches
the maximum conversion of 92-97% based on the relative sizes and steric hindrances of DGEBA
and DETA (44).
The glass transition data in Figure 22b shows that after room temperature cure, χ<1 samples have
a low glass transition which is consistent with the degree of cure they exhibit. After curing is
completed by means of a DSC cycle to 250ºC, the ultimate glass transition is exhibited. This is at
its highest for samples near the stoichiometric ratio, and decreases for samples with either excess
epoxide or excess amine. The large gap between Tg after RT cure and Tg∞ for χ=1 suggests a
great deal of difference between the RT cure and a completely cured stoichiometric network.
This difference can be reasonably attributed to both partially cured epoxide monomers and
unfulfilled crosslinks at amino hydrogen reactive sites.
3.1.2 FTIR cure characterization
Figure 23 shows the α(t) curve for DGEBA-DETA with χ=1 during a RT cure. The degree of
cure shows behavior typical of autocatalytic reactions, increasing rapidly until gelation sets in
and the reaction becomes diffusion controlled.

55
The degree of cure ultimately reached by this sample is αfinal =.576, slightly smaller than the DSC
measurement of .67. The DSC sample was cured in bulk, where temperatures can be slightly
higher due to buildup of heat released from the exotherm; this probably accounts for the
increased αfinal measured by DSC. Both measurements agree that a significant portion of the
epoxide and amine functional groups remain unreacted in RT-cured DGEBA-DETA, and must
be considered when discussing deformation processes.
Figure 24a shows α(t) curves for various stoichiometries of DGEBA-DETA. Figure 24b shows
the final degree of cure reached by samples with varying χ values. The stoichiometries of the
systems are listed in the legend of Figure 24a.
It is clear that increasing χ causes two main effects – an increase in and a higher value of αfinal.
These trends are in general agreement with the DSC results presented in Chapter 1 sec. 0. The
importance of these results will be discussed more thoroughly as they become relevant.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 5 10 15 20 25
DegreeofCure
Time (hr)
Figure 23: Degree of cure measured by FTIR over time for the curing of DGEBA-
DETA with χ=1 at room temperature. The maximum reached is α=.576.

56
3.1.3 Absorbance during cure
The absorbance of DGEBA-DETA changes very little during the cure process. Figure 25a shows
the absorbance spectra at t = 0hr, 10hr, and 20hr into cure. Figure 25b shows the values of the
absorbance at 447nm over the course of the cure.
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.5 1 1.5 2
degreofcure
amine-to-epoxide ratio, χ
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 5 10 15
degreeofcure
Time (hr)
0.75
1
1.1
1.2
1.5
1.75
Figure 24: FTIR studies of degree of cure for varying stoichiometries - a) α vs time and b) αfinal vs χ.
a) b)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
350 450 550 650 750
Absorbance(A)
Wavelength (nm)
0hr
10hr
20hr
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0 5 10 15 20 25
A447nm
Time (hr)
Figure 25: Absorbance of DGEBA-DETA during cure - a) absorbance spectra b) absorbance at 447nm vs time.
a) b)

57
The absorbance spectra show low-magnitude, featureless absorbance that is higher in UV
wavelengths than in visible. At 447nm, the spectra shows small decrease and increase behavior
during the initial stages of cure but remains constant after ~t=5hr. No new absorba nce features
are developed during curing. The variation of χ did not produce remarkably different behavior.
3.2 Summary of cure characterization
When DGEBA-DETA is cured at RT it does not reach complete cure at values of χ<1.1. The
measured final degree of cure, αfinal, was calculated to be 0.67 via DSC measurement, and .576
via FTIR measurement for samples with χ=1. DSC analysis showed that that Tg after cure was
63.9°C for χ=1. An increase in αfinal and Tg was observed when χ was increased, with Tg
subsequently decreasing after χ=1.1. FTIR analysis showed that increasing χ produced an
increase in αfinal and increased the rate of reaction before the onset of diffusion control.
Absorbance measurements during cure showed no development of absorbance features, and a
general decrease in absorbance from the initial state until t~3hr after which no changes were
observed.
4. SOLID DGEBA-DETA CHARACTERIZATION
The characteristics of DGEBA-DETA after curing into a solid are presented in this section. The
glass transition temperature as measured by DMA as well as the mechanical and optical
properties of DGEBA-DETA will be shown first, followed by the effects of changing
stoichiometric ratio and exposure to heat and deformation on the optical properties.

58
4.1 Glass transition
Figure 26a shows a typical storage modulus curve measured for DGEBA-DETA cured at room
temperature. The DMA measurements determined the glass transition of RT cured DGEBA-
DETA to occur at 56.9 deg C. This is in good agreement with the measurements of DSC in
presented in Chapter 1 section 3.1. The variation of Tg with χ was also measured with DMA.
Figure 26b has a plot of the Tg values measured.
This data also agrees well with the behavior observed in DSC measurements for variation of Tg
with χ. As in DSC, the Tg remains low for samples with χ<1.1, increases to the maximum
observed Tg at χ=1.1, and decreases as χ increases thereafter.
4.2 Mechanical properties
The mechanical properties of DGEBA-DETA were evaluated in uniaxial compression. Elastic
modulus and yield strength were characterized, and deformation behavior after yielding was
studied with relaxation measurements.
30 50 70 90 110 130
StorageModulus,E'
Temperature (deg C)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2
Temperature(degC)
Amine/epoxide ratio
Tg
Figure 26: a) typical plot of E’ vs T with Tg marked. b) variation of Tg with χ as measured by DMA.
a) b)

59
4.2.1 Elastic modulus, yield strength and strain
Figure 27 shows a typical loading and unloading stress strain curve used for measuring the
elastic modulus and yield point of RT cured DGEBA-DETA, with the fitline to the unloading
curve displayed, and an arrow highlighting the yield strength.
Based on an average of 5 samples, the elastic modulus E of RT cured DGEBA-DETA was
calculated as 1.619 ± .17 GPa. The yield strength was calculated as 126.7 ± 1.2 MPa, and
yielding began at a strain of .115 ± .012. Error is the standard deviation of the data set.
The values of E and σyield are typical of glassy polymers and agree with theoretical studies
suggesting that Van der Waals interactions between chains, not stretching of bonds within a
chain, are responsible primarily for the resistance to deformation in the elastic region of the
stress strain curve. The measured εyield is slightly higher than most glassy polymers which is an
expected variation attributed to crosslinking.
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
Stress(MPa)
Strain
(εyield, σyield)
Figure 27: Loading and unloading stress strain curve for RT cured DGEBA-DETA
in compression, with line used for calculating elastic modulus and arrow denoting
yield strength marked.

60
4.2.2 Strain recovery
Figure 28 shows the data collected during strain recovery study of RT cured DGEBA-DET A
deformed to varying true strains. The x-axis shows the εdef of each sample. The y axis displays
the amount of εpl remaining after relaxation, and the amount of εan that was recovered after
heating to Tg +10°C. The error bars are determined from the accuracy of sample dimension
measurement, propagated through the true strain calculation.
As suggested by the study in (38) the anelastic strain reaches a maximum at εdef ~.15 and does
not increase further with increasing deformation. The measured deformation is mostly anelastic
until plastic deformation begins at εdef ~ .05-.10. Plastic strain increases approximately linearly
as deformation increases after εdef ~.10-.15.
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
TrueStrain
True Strain
plastic strain
anelastic strain
Figure 28: Measured values of εan and εpl for varying amounts of εdef in RT cured DGEBA-
DETA deformed in uniaxial compression.

61
4.2.3 DSC of deformed samples
The DSC curve of an undeformed sample of DGEBA-DETA and the curves of samples of
varying levels of deformation are shown in Figure 29. These measurements are similar to the
ones in Figure 16 (34).
Samples show increasingly exothermic behavior at temperatures immediately below and above
Tg as the level of true strain increases. This result agrees with other DSC and deformation
calorimetry studies of glassy polymers and of epoxy in particular (34). This behavior has been
taken as an indication that deformation increases the internal energy of the epoxy sample in a
significant quantity. The exothermic change in samples with deformation is noticeable at
temperatures ~ 40°C (Tg - 20°C = 36.9-42.6°C), which is consistent with the temperatures at
which εan recovery becomes significant on a timescale consistent with laboratory work.
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
DSC(exo-->)
Temperature (deg C)
no deformation 0.252
0.344 0.483
0.56
Figure 29: DSC curve near Tg of undeformed and deformed samples of RT cured DGEBA-DETA.
εdef
Tg

62
4.3 Optical properties
The optical properties including the fluorescent excitation/emission, absorbance, and in-situ
fluorescent emission of solid DGEBA-DETA are very important to the study of the
mechanochromic behavior of probe molecules in DGEBA. This section presents the results of
studies of these properties on solid DGEBA-DETA. In addition, the changes that heat exposure
and mechanical deformation can cause in DGEBA-DETA optical behavior are important since
these stimuli will be used to evaluate the mechanochromic response in future work.
4.3.1 Excitation and emission spectra
The excitation and emission spectra were collected using the method described in sec. 2.2.3.2.
Figure 30 shows the excitation and emission spectra of DGEBA-DETA.
The excitation spectrum shows a featureless excitation in the UV wavelengths. Excitation at
260nm causes emission with several peaks in the region between 400 and 500nm (418, 438, 451,
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
200 300 400 500 600 700
Intensity(normalized)
Wavelength (nm)
emission 260mm
excitation 527nm
Figure 30: excitation and emission spectra from DGEBA-DETA. Legend has the excitation
and emission wavelengths.

63
479, 517nm), with very little emission above 550nm. These results will be used as references for
the in-situ fluorescent emission studies presented below.
4.3.2 Absorbance
Figure 31 shows the absorbance curve of a DGEBA-DETA sample. The solid DGEBA-DETA
absorbance is essentially unchanged from the absorbance during cure, a featureless curve that
increases at lower wavelengths (see Figure 25).
4.3.2.1 Effect of stoichiometry on absorbance
The effect of varying the stoichiometry of DGEBA-DETA on the absorbance is shown in Figure
32 below. The absorbance spectra show an increase in absorbance at ~375nm as χ increases,
which is partially obscured by the overall absorbance increase of epoxy at low wavelengths
compared to high. This increase is monotonic with increasing amine content.
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
300 400 500 600 700 800
Absorbance
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 31: Absorbance of DGEBA-DETA with x=1.

64
4.3.2.2 Effect of heat on absorbance
The effect of heat on DGEBA-DETA absorbance is dependent on the amine-to-epoxide ratio as
well. Samples with χ>1, which show the absorbance peak at 375nm, show an increase in
absorbance after heat exposure to 100°C for 24hr. Figure 33a shows this effect.
Because the peak is overlapping an area where both the bulk sample’s absorbance and rate of
change of absorbance is changing, quantitative analysis of this change requires some possibly
suspect interpretations. Our technique is to fit a line between the upper and lower wavelengths
of the absorbance peak, ~436nm and 350nm, and integrate from that line up to the absorbance
peak. Figure 33b shows these values before and after heating to 100°C. Negative values show
the sigmoidal shape of the curve extending below the linear approximation, while positive values
show the peak growing to extend above the line. Samples with χ>1 show an increase in the peak
while samples with χ<1 do not show any activity or a decrease in the peak.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
300 400 500 600 700 800
Absorbance
Wavelength (nm)
1-0.75 ratio
1-1 ratio
1-1.25 ratio
1-1.5 ratio
1-1.75 ratio
1-2.0 ratio
Figure 32: Absorbance of DGEBA-DETA for varying χ.

65
4.3.2.3 Effect of uniaxial compression on absorbance
The effect of uniaxial compression to varying levels of εdef on DGEBA-DETA absorbance is
shown in Figure 34. The absorbance of DGEBA-DETA is reduced in the UV and visible ranges
as compressive strain increases. A possible increase in absorbance can be seen at ~700nm;
however this could also simply be the lack of a decrease at this wavelength since the spectra
above 700nm track closely with the unstrained spectrum.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
300 400 500 600 700 800
Absorbance
Wavelength (nm)
1-1.5 ratio
1-1.5 ratio after 100C
24h
-10
-5
0
5
10
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Absorbance,375nmpeakint.
after 100C
24hr
before
Figure 33: Absorbance change due to heat a) sample with x=1.5. b) integrated absorbance for 377nm peak for
varying χ.
a) b)

66
While the absorbance of all strained samples is less than the unstrained sample, the trend is not
monotonic with increasing strain. The largest decrease occurs for the sample with εdef~.159,
which is very near the beginning of εpl formation. After this the absorbance values increase
again. This could be an artifact of the decreasing thickness of samples, which reduces
absorbance according to the Beer-Lambert Law. The absorbance changes could also be due to
the morphological changes associated with increased ∆Udef or shear defect nucleation, though no
reason is apparent.
4.3.3 In situ emission
Emission data was collected using the method in Chapter 1section 2.2.3.3 using a390nm LED
illumination. The emission of DGEBA-DETA with χ=1 is shown in Figure 35. One emission
peak is observed, with a maximum emission wavelength of 505nm due to 390nm illumination.
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Absorbance
Wavelength (nm)
before 0
0.007 0.03
0.068 0.159
0.238 0.267
0.272
Figure 34: Absorbance spectra of DGEBA-DETA samples compressed to varying εdef.

67
Using the spectrometer with probe tip instead of the fluorimeter setup (compare spectra with
Figure 30), the measured emission shows less defined peak structure. The emission covers
roughly the same wavelength range.
4.3.3.1 Effect of stoichiometry on emission
The emission behavior shows a great deal of change with changes in χ, as seen in Figure 36. The
emission increases as χ increases, and the peak structure resolves into a dominant peak at
~505nm and a smaller peak at ~437nm. This is consistent with illumination in the higher
wavelengths of the excitation spectrum, which would logically excite the lower-energy emission
peaks more strongly.
4.3.3.2 Effect of heat on emission
The effect of heat on the emission of DGEBA-DETA when illuminated by 390nm excitation
light is shown in Figure 37a, which shows the change in emission due to 100°C exposure, and
Figure 37b, which shows the peak emission intensity change due to heat for different χ values.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
Intensity(counts)
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 35: Fluorescent emission of DGEBA-DETA X=1.

68
The change in emission is a uniform increase in peak intensity at the ~505nm peak. The increase
becomes stronger as χ increases.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
Intensity(counts)
Wavelength (nm)
1-0.75 ratio
1-1 ratio
1-1.25 ratio
1-1.5 ratio
1-1.75 ratio
1-2.0 ratio
Figure 36: Fluorescent emission of DGEBA-DETA with varying χ.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
400 500 600 700 800
Intensity(counts)
Wavelength (nm)
1-1.5 ratio
1-1.5 ratio after
24h 100C
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Peakemissionintensity(counts)
Amine to Epoxide ratio, χ
RT cure
100C 24hr
Figure 37: Change in emission due to heating at 100C for 24hr. a) Emission spectra change for X=1.5. b) Peak
emission intensity change for varying χ.

69
4.3.3.3 Effect of uniaxial compression on emission
The change in emission with respect to increasing εdef is shown in Figure 38 for DGEBA-DETA
with χ=1. The emission intensity and peak wavelength changes are negligible, within
experimental error, due to increasing εdef. No peak resolution in the emission spectra are
observed. While absorbance changes were observed, emission was unchanged with εdef.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
450 550 650 750
Intensity(counts)
Wavelength (nm)
0
0.007
0.03
0.068
0.159
0.238
0.267
0.272
Figure 38: Fluorescent emission of DGEBA-DETA with varying levels of εdef.

70
4.4 Summary
Table 3 has a summary of the properties characterized in the research presented in this section.
Table 3: Relevant Properties of RT cured DGEBA-DETA, χ=1.
Elastic Modulus, E (GPa) 1.619 ± .17
Yield Strength, σyield (MPa) 126.7 ± 1.2
Yield Strain, εyield .115 ± .012
Degree of Cure, α [DSC], [FTIR] 0.67, 0.576
Glass Transition, Tg (°C) [DSC] [DMA] 62.6 ± .754 , 56.9 ± .689
Peak Absorbance, nm 375 (χ>1.1)
Peak Emission, nm (390nm excitation) 505
The measured E, εyield and σyield are consistent with literature reports of the properties of glassy
amorphous polymers and with experiments that suggest the elastic region of the stress-strain
curve is determined primarily by stretching of secondary Van der Waals type bonds between
chains.
The low values of αfinal measured by DSC and FTIR suggest that a relatively low crosslink
density is to be expected from RT cured DGEBA-DETA compared with other epoxies. When
compared with Figure 10 and the surrounding discussion, this confirms that DGEBA-DETA
should develop εdef via yielding processes rather than crazing processes.
The values of Tg measured with DSC and DMA suggest that relaxation events should be
expected at temperatures of ~40°C and above. DSC measurements of deformed samples

71
indicated an increase in the exothermic energy release beginning at temperatures ~40°C, and
were not observed in samples strained below εdef ~.15. These results are consistent with current
theories about epoxy deformation, shear defect formation, and internal energy storage.
Measurements of the recovery of samples heated to 70°C showed the onset of εan at strains of εdef
~.15.
The absorbance and emission spectra of DGEBA-DETA with χ=1 were collected, and the
changes due to variation in χ, heat exposure, and εdef were determined. Table 4 summarizes the
changes in absorbance and emission due to these conditions.
Table 4: Summary of changes to absorbance and emission of DGEBA-DETA.
Property Increase in χ Heat exposure Increase in εdef
Absorbance Increase, 375nm peak develops (χ>1.1) Increase (χ>1.1) Decrease
Emission Increase, peaks resolve Increase No Change
This data will help to explore the behavior of the probe molecules AJNDE15 and AJNDE17,
which will be explored in Chapter 2.

72
CHAPTER 2
MECHANOCHROMIC PROBES IN EPOXY
1. INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, mechanochromism in solid polymers will be introduced. The mechanisms
reported in literature to date for mechanochromism in solid polymers will be discussed.
A new mechanism for mechanochromism developed by this research project and designed
specifically for use in DGEBA-DETA structural epoxy will be presented, and will be compared
with the established mechanisms reported thus far.
1.1 Approach # 1 - Aggregation-based mechanisms
If two probe molecules are in very close proximity to one another they may share the energy of
an absorbed photon between them in a manner similar to Dexter energy transfer (see Introduction
section 2.1) by merging their electron density to form an excimer complex (when two identical
molecules are involved, the excimer is commonly called a dimer). The dimer complex absorbs
the photon and is promoted to a higher energy state, which then decays as in single molecule
fluorescence. The dimer complex usually emits photons of lower energy than the single
molecule, called in this context a monomer. This phenomenon is also termed aggregation.
The fluorescence behavior of most dye molecules is quenched by aggregation – the dimer
formation is much more likely to return to the ground energy state via a non-radiative energy
transition than by emitting a photon (49). However, fluorescent emission from aggregate states
is exhibited strongly in molecules with an intrinsic dipole moment and highly populated π orbital

73
structures such as benzene rings and conjugated chains. An illustrative case is pyrene, a molecule
with a planar structure of several benzene rings and highly active π structure above and below
the molecular plane. Figure 39a shows the absorption spectrum of pyrene as a monomer and as a
dimer, with Figure 39b showing the energy levels of pyrene monomer and excimer absorption as
a function of distance between molecules. When the distance becomes close enough it is
energetically favorable for the dimer state to absorb photons and emit at the longer wavelengths
shown in Figure 39a (50; 51).
Dimers can only form when two molecules are in very close proximity (1-5 ), so their formation
is especially dependent on their local environment. In non-polar liquid solutions which do not
interact with the dye molecules, aggregation is strictly a function of concentration, with dimer
activity increasing as concentration increases. The lifetime of the excited state is on the order of
10-7
s, which dictates that the concentrations in liquid must be on the order of 10-4
– 10-3
mol/L to
achieve the necessary proximity (50). The overall aggregation state can be determined for the
Figure 39: left: emission of pyrene monomer (solid) and excimer (dashed). right: Energy levels of
ground to excited state transition of monomer P* and excimer (P-P)* vs intermolecular separation.
From (50; 51).
a) b)

74
solution by comparing the magnitude of activity (whether absorbance or emission) of the
monomer state to that of the dimer state, with the dimer state more active when aggregation is
highly prevalent.
For probe molecules in solid polymers the overall aggregation state depends on many factors.
One of these factors is obviously concentration, but the surrounding polymer network
characteristics also play a large part. Most importantly for our research, the aggregation state of
some molecules can be influenced by mechanical deformation of the surrounding bulk polymer.
1.1.1 Aggregation-based mechanochromism
Research has demonstrated several molecule types that show deformation induced fluorescence
changes in solid polymers based on aggregation. One early example explored copolymers of
poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and 1-naphthyl methyl methacrylate (NMMA) (52).
Naphthalene is a molecule with known sensitivity to aggregation; incorporating it into PMMA
chains enabled excimer formation between naphthyl units on adjacent chains. When the bulk
polymer was elongated, initial excimers were pulled apart during the deformation, while new
excimers formed at sites newly in close proximity. Figure 40a has a schematic of the excimer
Figure 40: a) Schematic of excimer interaction before and after PMMA elongation. b) a-monomer emission
c-excimer emission of naphthalene in PMMA chain. From (52).

75
interaction before and after elongation, while Figure 40b shows the excimer emission spectrum
of naphthalene compared to the monomer spectrum.
PMMA-NMMA copolymer films were uniaxially deformed in tension while fluorescent
emission spectra were collected under UV illumination. Figure 41a shows a schematic of the test
setup, while Figure 41b shows the collected spectra at several levels of strain. To analyze the
excimer to monomer ratio, Yang and co-authors noted that the ratio of the emission intensity of
the monomer Im (for naphthalene Yang et.al. chose 337nm) to the intensity of excimer Ie (447nm)
should reflect their relative concentrations. A plot of these ratios for films of two concentrations
of NMMA is in Figure 41c. At an appropriate concentration, shown in the data at the top of
Figure 41c, this ratio changes with strain, showing increased monomer activity as strain
increases.
Of particular note is work done by the Weder group using as fluorescent molecules cyano-
modified oligophenyline-vinylidene (cyano-OPVs). The emission wavelengths of cyano-OPVs
in the monomer and dimer states are dramatically different, making them very well suited for
Figure 41: a) Schematic of test setup for elongation of PMMA-naphthalene films. b) emission spectra vs.
strain for N-PMMA films. c) Intensity ratio for N-PMMA films. From (52).

76
optical aggregation studies. These molecules were incorporated into ductile solid polymers via
melt processing, with control of the concentration and processing to promote formation of nano-
scale aggregate states. As the bulk polymer network deforms, molecular shear mixing as the
polymer chains pass by one another breaks up the probe aggregates, causing the overall
aggregation state to display more monomeric character (53). Similar results were obtained when
probe molecules were bound onto polymer chains, then bulk polymers were deformed in tension.
Chain motion moved the bound probes away from one another as tensile strain increased,
reducing excimer formation and increasing monomer character.
Figure 42a shows an example of a cyano-OPV molecule in a linear low-density polyethylene
(LLDPE) tensile specimen under UV excitation, while Figure 42b shows the emission spectra of
the necking region of the tensile as stress increases (54). In this case, the cyano-OPV has dimer
emission in the red wavelengths and monomer emission in the green. A dramatic shift in
emission spectra between the monomer and dimer complexes resulted in red fluorescence from
the dimer emission in unstressed areas of the tensile bar, and green emission (monomer
fluorescence) in the highly deformed areas. Other research has observed aggregation induced
Figure 42: a) tensile LLDPE specimens with cyano-OPVs. b) Emission spectra with arrows showing changes
as deformation increases. From (54; 53).

77
quenching or increased emission due to local probe proximity changes as the sample with probes
incorporated is deformed (53).
This research was conducted using linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), a semicrystalline
thermoplastic polymer of low modulus and high free volume at room temperature. LLDPE is
capable of very high elongation in tension, and in this case changes in cyano-OPV fluorescence
were reported for values of strain in excess of 300-500%. The aggregation based approach to
deformation sensing polymer probes will be dependent on the degree of deformation that a
sample has achieved. All indications point to a high degree of deformation required to
physically change the aggregation state of a probe molecule.
1.2 Approach #2 – Intramolecular isomer mechanism
The mechanism in this approach is based on the conformational transitions of chemical bonds in
response to mechanical force. A diagram of one such transition is in Figure 43. The bond in this
figure is a cis-trans rotation around a double bond. The dashed lines outline the volume required
for such a transition. Probes based on this type of molecule are often referred to as ‘molecular
rotor’ type probes. Other mechanochromic probes take advantage of twisted intramolecular
charge transfer (TICT) as a rearrangement method between conformations. To be useful as a
mechanochromic probe, the molecule must have different fluorescence characteristics in the two
Figure 43: Cis trans transition of a 'molecular rotor' type probe. From (55).

78
transition states, and the transition between them must be dependent on the mechanical force or
deformation. Free volume in solid polymers is changed by mechanical deformation and
therefore a probe sensitive to free volume can be mechanochromic in nature.
Probes using the intramolecular isomer approach have been used to monitor the free volume
within epoxy polymers during curing. One such probe is DASPI ((4-dimethylaminostyryl)-2-
ethyl-pyridinium oxide), shown in Figure 44a. This probe has excited TICT states which twist
around the single and double bonds between the ring structures. When mixed into epoxy before
curing, the transition from one isomer to the other is initially rapid, due to the high free volume
in the liquid. As the epoxy cures, free volume is reduced and the transition speed becomes
slower. A plot of the transition rate constant vs. degree of conversion of the surrounding
network is shown in Figure 44b, showing the transition time slowing as free volume reduced
during cure. This measurement of cure behavior correlates very well with other methods such as
sol-gel and dynamic mechanical analysis (55).
The characteristic most polymer free volume probes, including DASPI, use is the fluorescence
lifetime, or rate of fluorescence decay. This transition occurs faster in polymers of larger free
Figure 44: a) Molecular structure of DASPI free volume probe. b) DASPI Fluorescence lifetime vs. degree of
cure of epoxy matrix. From (55).

79
volume. A version of this probe for the application of mechanical damage would have two
configurations, OFF and ON, which have easily identifiable differences in fluorescent emission.
The probe molecule would preferentially form the OFF or ON state based on the free volume of
its surroundings, and would therefore respond to bulk mechanical deformation due to the
deformation’s effect on the polymer free volume.
1.2.1 Free volume in polymers
The free volume Vf is defined as the volume in a bulk polymer sample that is not permanently
occupied by molecules (56; 57; 58). The free volume can be used to understand many important
polymer properties such as freezing - a polymer has large free volume in liquid state and as it
cools, free volume decreases until it is small enough to inhibit chain motion, at which point the
polymer solidifies. The relationships between free volume and important polymer properties
such as chain mobility (Vf increases as chain mobility increases), molecular weight (Vf decreases
as molecular weight increases), and crystallinity (Vf decreases as crystallinity increases) are all
intuitive and have been studied extensively (56; 57; 58). Other relationships are less intuitive,
however, and those that are important to this research will be discussed more thoroughly when
necessary.
The free volume concept has several drawbacks. Free volume is difficult to measure directly,
with only positron annihilation loss spectroscopy (PALS) claiming to be a direct measurement
technique. In this technique, ortho-positronium atoms from a radioactive source are passed
through the solid polymer. The positrons exist preferentially in vacuum, and so in a polymer will
congregate in the free volume. The positron lifetime is a measure of the size of the free volume
hole in which the positron decays, while the intensity of positrons passing through the sample is

80
a measure of the number of free volume holes. In this manner a profile of the free volume in a
solid polymer can be developed, which can be summarized by the average hole radius and the
size distribution of the holes. It is difficult to quantify changes across variations in polymer
systems because of the mismatch between geometric free volume and the free volume for
molecular movement for different molecules. Nonetheless, free volume is a unifying way to
discuss the interactions between a fluorescent probe molecule and the solid network polymer
around it.
1.2.2 Epoxy free volume
Epoxy free volume has been studied by a variety of methods, but the most direct method is by
positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS). The average radius of holes in cured epoxy
are generally on the order of 1-5 , with maximum hole volumes reaching as high as 150
according to some measurements. Free volume also varies as a number of bulk properties of the
polymer are changed including plastic deformation and temperature.
1.2.3 Intramolecular isomer probes - mechanochromism
The behavior of an intramolecular isomeric probe in a solid polymer is highly dependent on the
polymer’s free volume characteristics, as has been demonstrated in many works (55; 59).
Mechanical deformation has been shown to cause changes in the free volume characteristics of
many solid polymers, which would cause an intramolecular isomer to display mechanochromic
behavior changes.

81
Deviatoric stress on a glassy polymer can cause changes in both the size and density of free
volume holes (60). Plastic deformation is thought to occur in glassy polymers through localized
shear transformations in areas with high free volume. These transformations increase the free
volume hole size as they occur. The effect of uniaxial compressive loading in particular has
been shown to cause an increase in hole volume size. Results of free volume hole sizes collected
after plastic deformation of epoxy samples are shown in Figure 45 (60; 61). The effect of
hydrostatic compressive pressure cause both a decrease in free volume hole size and a decrease
in the number of free volume holes (62).
In this mechanism, the intramolecular isomer’s would be affected by the change in free volume
hole size brought about by mechanical damage and would therefore display mechanochromic
character.
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
Averageholevolume(A^3)
Strain
Figure 45: Average free volume hole volume for varying compressive strains in
epoxy. From (60; 61).

82
1.3 Approach #3 – Mechanochemical reaction mechanism
Mechanochemical reactions are a type of reaction where mechanical force or stress promotes
reactions that would otherwise not readily occur. There are examples of mechanochemical
reactions in many fields including biology and metallurgy (63). Two important examples of
mechanochemistry in solid polymers are stress-induced homolytic chain scission and
photodegradation of polymer films (63; 64). Polymer chains under large amounts of mechanical
stress will undergo chain scission, preferentially at the middle bond of the polymer where
internal friction stresses are highest. In photooxidation of polymer films, the rate of the
photooxidation reaction is greatly increased by mechanical strain on the polymer. Experimental
results suggest that the strain on the polymer chains reduces the recombination of radical chain
ends after hemolysis of a chain due to UV light exposure (65).
Figure 46: Spiropyran to Merocyanine transition. From (66).

83
1.3.1 Mechanochemical reaction - mechanochromism
Mechanochemical reactions can cause mechanochromic changes within probe molecules in solid
polymers as well. One example of a probe molecule type that has this type of behavior is
spiropyran. Mechanical stress can cause the transition around carbons 3 and 4, which changes
the molecule into a merocyanine as shown in Figure 46. Spiropyran has yellow color and little
fluorescent emission, while merocyanine has purple color and high fluorescent emission (66).
Researchers have covalently bound a spiropyran molecule at both ends within chains of poly
(methyl acrylate) (PMA) and poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Solid dogbone specimens of
the polymer were then loaded in tension in a creep-like deformation. As polymer chains
extended, the molecule transformed from spiropyran to merocyanine form. Figure 47a has a
schematic of the approach, while Figure 47b shows images of the spiropyran to merocyanine
transition visible as the bulk PMA specimen is deformed. The transition was quantified
spectrally by measuring intensity of green-emitting wavelengths – these were observed to
decrease as the spiropyran-merocyanine transition advanced in a PMMA specimen. Figure 47c
has the stress-strain curves at the top, with the spectral changes shown at the bottom.
Figure 47: a) Schematic of spiropyran-merocyanine transition in solid polymer tensile specimen. b) Images of
tensile specimen under stress showing yellow to red transition. c) Data showing decrease in green intensity
for PMMA spheres with probe molecules. From (66).

84
Mechanochromic reactions such as spiropyran-merocyanine are influenced by mechanical force.
But the reaction must still be favorable from a thermodynamic standpoint to proceed. A recent
review described the situation succinctly –
‘In general, mechanical force will lower the barrier for a particular reaction…the final transition
over the barrier, however, will in general be thermally activated (63).’
Zhurkov described the rate of a mechanochemical reaction with a modified Arrhenius equation
9
where K is the reaction rate, K0 the reaction rate constant, EA the activation energy for the
reaction, σ the mechanical stress, α a constant such that the product ασ has units of energy, R the
gas constant and T temperature (67). The energy imparted to the molecule by mechanical stress
lowers the activation energy for reaction, which will proceed at a rate determined by
temperature.
Zhurkov’s work described the mechochemical rupture of atomic bonds in polymers, but the
mechanochemical equation has been applied to strain-enhanced photodegradation (64), milling-
enhanced metal synthesis (68), and grain boundary growth in metal powders (69).
This mechanism would show increasing fluorescent activity in polymers with mechanical force,
but would also be activated by elevated temperatures, which would allow the reaction to
overcome the activation energy barrier and convert from OFF to ON.

85
1.4 Approach #4 – Scission based mechanism
In this approach the fracture of a solid polymer is used to cause chain scission within a polymer
chain. The bonds that are broken in this scission cause a probe molecule’s fluorescence to
activate, making the molecule an effective sensor for microcracking and fracture events.
1.4.1 Scission-based mechanism - mechanochromism
Researchers have developed probe molecules which in the aggregated state are not fluorescent
active, but are bound together by weak covalent bonds that can be broken by mechanically-
driven chain scission. An example of this is in research by the Chung group, which used
anthracene - and tricinnamate – based molecules (70; 71).
Figure 48a and b have schematic diagrams of the concept of crack-activated fluorescence in
anthracene- and tricinnamate-based molecules.
Figure 48: Fluorescent crack sensors based on a) anthracene and b) tricinnamate
molecules. From (70; 71).
a) b)

86
The molecules initially are in a non-fluorescent state, bound together by cycloaddition into
cyclo-octane type dimers. The bond strength of the cyclobutane carbon-carbon bond has been
shown to be significantly lower than other C-C or C-O bonds due to the high ring strain.
Because of this the cyclobutane bond can be expected to be among the most prevalent bonds
broken as a crack propagates through a bulk polymer (71; 72; 73).
To incorporate the molecules into solid polymers for use as crack sensors, the anthracene dimers
(AA) were used as crosslinking agents in the polymerization of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) (70).
The tricinnamate molecules were photocrosslinked into a polymer, 1,1,1 –
tris(cinnamoyloxymethyl)ethane (TCE) (71). Cracks were introduced to the bulk polymers both
by grinding (forming many fracture surfaces among the small particles) and by flexing solvent-
cast thin films (to produce cracked and uncracked regions for comparison). Fluorescent spectra
a) c)
d
)
b
)
Figure 49: TCE crack sensing polymer a) emission spectra c) thin film crack images. b) PVA-AA
emission spectra and d) thin film crack images. From (70; 71).

87
and thin-film cracked images of TCE are in Figure 49a and c, and of PVA-AA in Figure 49b and
d. The images were taken with a fluorescence microscope using UV illumination.
This mechanism would show sensitivity to mechanical deformation only in that it would produce
microcracks that cause scission within a molecule or between two molecules, turning the probe
from OFF to ON.
1.5 Proposed mechanism – Conjugation pathway interference
This research project has developed what is thought to be a novel mechanochromic mechanism,
designed specifically for use in amine-cured epoxies. Probe molecules have been designed with
conjugation pathways between an electron donating group and an electron accepting group,
allowing for π electron transfer and high fluorescent activity. When in contact with a primary
amine group, however, a reaction between the amine and the probe along the conjugation bridge
breaks the pathway, inhibits electron transfer, and quenches the fluorescence activity. A
schematic of the reaction between probes and amine is shown in Figure 50. These two states are
termed the ON (highly fluorescent) and OFF (quenched) states of the probe molecule.
The proposed mechanochromic response of these probes occurs from the OFF state to the ON
state. The application of mechanical force to the OFF molecule while it is in a polymer matrix
can dissociate the C-N bond that is interrupting the conjugation pathway. The pathway’s
Figure 50: Proposed ONOFF reaction of probe with amine group.
ON OFF

88
reconnection allows the molecule to fluoresce again. The schematic of this reaction is shown in
Figure 51.
The mechanochromic mechanism of the probes depends on the dissociation of the C-N bond
preferentially when compared to the other bonds nearby. A preliminary comparison of bond
dissociation energies shows that C-N bonds (70 kcal/mol) are weaker than C-C (83 kcal/mol) or
C=C (146 kcal/mol) bonds, and would logically be the first bond (apart from the donor and
acceptor groups) to dissociate within the molecule (74).
The proposed mechanism of probe molecules suggests a mechanochemical interpretation, where
force imparts energy that makes a thermally-activated chemical transition more likely. However,
there is also the possibility that AJNDE15 displays some aggregation character since the
molecule in the ON state has an intrinsic dipole moment and could form aggregates. The
proposed mechanism is not isomeric in nature, but it is still conceivable that this reaction
requires free volume to occur and would therefore display similar sensitivity to free volume in
the polymer. Finally, the chain scission approach could be appropriate because of the lower
dissociation energy of C-N bonds – a crack propagating through a solid polymer would
dissociate the C-N bond before the other bonds in the area.
Figure 51: Proposed mechanochromic OFFON transition.
OFF ON

89
1.6 Summary of mechanochromic mechanisms
The four mechanisms outlined in this review describe how fluorescent probe behavior changes in
response to mechanical damage or deformation. A novel mechanism was also proposed, and
compared to these four established mechanisms.
In the aggregation approach, mechanical deformation forces the probe molecules closer or
farther apart, which promotes or deactivates the aggregation characteristics of the molecules. It
is a multimolecular mechanism and as such will be dependent on the probe concentration as well
as the degree of mechanical deformation.
In the intramolecular isomer approach, a molecular probe activates when mechanical
deformation in the bulk polymer increases the free volume available for isomerization to occur.
Transitions that require a larger amount of free volume will occur more often when the free
volume increases, and less often when it decreases.
In the mechanochemical reaction approach, a molecular probe is activated when mechanical
stress in the bulk polymer causes a chemical reaction in the molecule to occur. This probe type
will display sensitivity to mechanical damage when the energy imparted by the damage reduces
the reaction’s activation energy to the point where it proceeds spontaneously at the
environmental temperature.
In the scission-based approach, a molecular probe’s fluorescence activates when cracks caused
by mechanical deformation break bonds that create an active fluorescent molecule out of an
inactive fluorescent molecule. Mechanisms based on the breaking of cyclobutane bonds have
been demonstrated in the literature.

90
In the course of this research project a series of molecules have been developed that display
mechanochromic behavior via a proposed novel mechanism involving a reaction between the
probe and the amine functional groups in the curing agent of epoxy. Mechanical force promotes
the dissociation of this bond, which connects a conjugation pathway within the molecule and
activates fluorescence.
The goal of this chapter is to evaluate the proposed mechanism and the the four established
mechanisms by comparison with and analysis of experimental results.
2. MECHANOCHROMIC CHARACTERIZATION METHODS
In this section the characterization methods necessary to evaluate the mechanochromic behavior
of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 will be described. In most cases, these will be simple modifications
of the methods described in Chapter 1 section 2. Representative spectra will be presented to
allow for discussion of the variable R, which is based on characteristics of the fluorescent
emission of the probe-epoxy system.
2.1 Materials and sample preparation
In this section the preparation of samples for testing will be described, with differences in the
procedures taken for DGEBA-DETA alone highlighted. The two probe molecules AJNDE15
and AJNDE17 will also be described.
2.1.1 AJNDE15
The probe molecule labeled AJNDE15 has the general structure shown in Figure 52. It is
Figure 52: AJNDE15 schematic. X, Y are functional groups.

91
initially in the ON state. In theory, AJNDE15 will turn OFF during the mixing and curing
process by reaction with an unconsumed amine functional group (see Figure 50). After curing,
the molecule will be in the OFF state and will be prepared to turn ON when it experiences
mechanical deformation or damage (see Figure 51).
2.1.2 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA - Mixing and curing
Probe AJNDE15 was received in powder form. The powder dissolved well in both DGEBA and
DETA at room temperatures. Figure 53 shows DGEBA and DETA with AJNDE15 dissolved.
In DGEBA, AJNDE15 is strongly purple in color, while in DETA it shows no color. This is
evidence that the probe has turned OFF while in DETA solution via the reaction with DETA
amine groups.
2.1.3 AJNDE17
Probe AJNDE17 is designed with a similar structure to AJNDE15, but to begin in the OFF state,
where AJNDE15 began in the ON state. A schematic of AJNDE17 is shown in Figure 54.
Figure 53: AJNDE15 dissolved in DGEBA
(left) and DETA (right).

92
With AJNDE17 beginning in the OFF state, the need for an amine to react with in order to turn
the probe OFF is removed. In theory, this should result in a more consistently OFF state after
curing, which would allow a more extensive OFFON transition due to mechanical
deformation.
AJNDE17 is received as a liquid in 50wt% solution with DETA. The solution is diluted with
DETA to the proper concentration, mixed with DGEBA, and cured as in 2.1.2. The liquid
DETA has a yellow color as seen in Figure 55.
Figure 54: AJNDE17 schematic.
Figure 55: AJNDE17 dissolved in DETA.

93
The curing of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE15 and DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 was accompanied by a
color change in the developing solid. Images of the samples before curing and after curing for
AJNDE15 are presented in Figure 56.
2.2 Characterization methods
In this section the methods for characterization of the mechanochromism of AJNDE15 and
AJNDE17 will be presented, and the differences between these methods and the ones described
in Chapter 1 section 2 will be highlighted.
2.2.1 Cure characterization
The cure of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 were characterized using absorbance
techniques. Samples with varying χ values were allowed to cure in plastic cuvettes as in Chapter
1section 2.1.3.
The cure of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 was also measured with DSC and FTIR, with no
measureable differences at the concentrations studied.
Figure 56: before (left) and after curing (right) images of DGEBA-
DETA-AJNDE15 system.

94
2.2.2 Characterization of solid polymer
The characterization techniques for solid DGEBA-DETA are outlined in this section. Some
properties are not changed by the incorporation of probe molecules, and these are mentioned.
2.2.2.1 Glass transition
The glass transition behavior of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE15 was tested using DMA, and was not
found to be measurably different due to the presence of the probe molecules.
2.2.2.2 Mechanical properties
Uniaxial compression tests for modulus and yield strength were conducted as in Chapter 1
section 2.2.2, with no measurable differences in properties due to the presence of the probe
molecules.
Tests of probe response to varying εdef were accomplished by first measuring the optical
properties of undeformed samples and then conducting the deformation. After deformation,
sample optical properties were re-measured as soon as possible after testing. The delay in
measurement after deformation was usually on the order of minutes.
2.2.2.3 Optical properties
The absorbance spectra of samples before and after exposure to some stimulus were measured as
in Chapter 1 section 2.2.3.1. The samples often had different dimensions before and after
testing, which caused absorbance differences that were corrected for by offsetting spectra to 0A
at 850nm.
The fluorescent emission and excitation of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 was collected as in
Chapter 1 section 2.2.3.2 . The probe was turned ON via exposure to 70°C for 1 minute.

95
The fluorescent emission of samples was also collected via the spectrometer probe tip setup as in
Chapter 1 section 2.2.3.3. Sample spectra were collected before and after some stimulus,
whether heat exposure, mechanical deformation, or hydrostatic pressure. Typical spectra
collected from the OFF and ON states of the sample are shown in Figure 57.
The OFF emission dispays fluorescent emission with a single peak at 505nm which has been
identified as the fluorescence peak of DGEBA-DETA (see Chapter 1 section 2.2.3.2). The ON
state emission has this epoxy fluorescence as well as a strong fluorescence at 630nm, which we
associate with the ON state of the probe molecule.
Direct analysis of the intensities of many of the spectra collected in this work, and comparisons
between samples of different sizes or that have undergone physical changes, is not feasible due
to the potential for changes in alignment of the portable probe illumination/detection tip of the
spectrometer apparatus. To account for this, emission spectra were analyzed by referencing
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
450 550 650 750
Wavelength (nm)
ON
OFF
Figure 57: Typical OFF and ON spectra collected via spectrometer probe tip method.

96
intensity values to other values within the same spectrum, similar to the ratiometric techniques
discussed in the Introduction section 2.2. A method of quantifying the OFFON transition of
probe molecules has been developed by normalizing the data with respect to the value of the
505nm peak emission which is present in both OFF and ON states. The ratio of the peaks in the
OFF state can be compared to the ratio of the peaks in the ON state before and after the transition
via the following relation
⁄ ⁄
⁄
10
where R is defined as the change in OFFON ratio in percent, and are the emission
intensities of the ON and OFF peaks AJNDE15 before the transition, and and are the
emission intensities of the peaks after the transition. Using this relation the magnitude of the
OFFON transition can be compared for various external stimuli. This procedure is similar to
the one used to quantify changes in the monomer-dimer ratio of naphthalene in PMMA films
deformed in tension (52). It is also very closely similar to the modified Stern Volmer relation
used to characterize the response of ratiometric probe systems (Eqn.2 Introduction section 2.2).
3. CHARACTERIZATION OF AJNDE15 MECHANOCHROMISM
In this section the results of the characterization of the mechanochromic probe molecule
AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA will be presented. The results will be discussed in context of the
four mechanisms reviewed in section 1 and a mechanism best fitting the observed behavior will
be identified.

97
3.1 Characterization of cure
The cure behavior of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE15 system was measured using absorbance. An
example of the data obtained is shown in Figure 58 for a concentration of .05wt% AJNDE15
with χ=1. Also plotted is data for DGEBA-DETA cured over 24 hours.
3.2 Absorbance
It is plain that two absorbance peaks due to AJNDE15 absorbance develop over time – one at
447nm and one at 564nm. Plots of the absorbance values with respect to time for each of these
peaks are shown in Figure 59, with absorbance of DGEBA-DETA at 447nm as well (see Figure
25). There is an initial decrease in absorbance which can be attributed to a change in the
DGEBA-DETA system since it also occurs in samples with no AJNDE15. The peak at 447nm
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
Absorbance(A)
Wavelength (nm)
0hr
3hr
6hr
9hr
12hr
15hr
18hr
18hr
21hr
epoxy only 0hr
epoxy only 10hr
epoxy only 20hr
Figure 58: Absorbance of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA during curing. Dashed lines - DGEBA-DETA
alone.

98
grows very quickly and reaches a maximum value after which it remains essentially constant
throughout the curing process, while the peak at 564nm grows steadily as the curing progresses.
There are several phenomena that could cause this absorbance behavior including a change in the
polarity of the mixture as functional groups are consumed (75), a change in the free volume as
liquid epoxy turns to solid (57), or a change in viscosity (59). Based on the proposed
mechanism, however, this would suggest that after being turned OFF by reaction with an
unbound amine, AJNDE15 is turned ON via a reaction that removes the amine.
The absorbance behavior of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA is highly dependent on the
stoichiometry of the initial mixture. While the general behavior of the absorbance peaks of
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0 5 10 15 20 25
Absorbance(A)
Time (hr)
AJNDE15 447nm
AJNDE15 564nm
DGEBA-DETA 447nm
Figure 59: Absorbance values for AJNDE15 peaks in DGEBA-DETA during cure. Blue points
are DGEBA-DETA with no AJNDE15.

99
AJNDE15 over time is similar for each mixture, the absorbance values reached after 24 hours of
curing show a definite correlation with χ. Figure 60a has a plot of the final absorbance values
with respect to χ, while Figure 60b has an image of the final cured cuvettes.
It is important to note that changes in DGEBA-DETA itself do not occur in this wavelength
region during curing – peak increases in DGEBA-DETA occur due to stoichiometric or
temperature changes at 375nm. These absorbance peaks are strictly due to AJNDE15.
It is clear that the final absorbance values of the cured samples changes as χ increases. The
447nm absorbance is still present at the highest χ values, giving the solid bulk polymer a slightly
yellow-orange color, but the 564nm peak has all but vanished.
3.3 Characterization of solid polymer
In this section the properties of the DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE15 after curing will be presented.
The properties will be compared with DGEBA-DETA with no probe molecules incorporated.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Absorbance
447nm
564nm
Figure 60: a)Absorbance of peaks at 447 and 564nm of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA after cure
for varying stoichiometries. b) Images of cuvettes after cure – left to right: χ=1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.5,
2.0.
a) b)

100
3.3.1 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA – Excitation and emission
The excitation and emission spectra of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE15 showed no differences from
DGEBA-DETA when the probe is in the OFF state. After activation via heat, though, the spectra
showed strong emission in the range 600-630nm. The excitation and emission spectra for this
particular behavior is shown in Figure 61.
The excitation spectrum associated with AJNDE15 emission begins at ~450nm and grows to a
peak at ~610nm. The emission caused by excitation at 505nm shows narrow emission beginning
at approximately 600nm, with peak emission at ~630nm.
The combined emission of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE15 is caused by a single 390nm excitation
source during in-situ measurements from the spectrometer probe. The emission and excitation
spectra for DGEBA-DETA and the AJNDE15 emission in activated DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE15
are shown in Figure 62, with the combined emission spectrum due to 390nm excitation offset
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
Wavelength (nm)
excitation 640nm
emission 505nm
Figure 61: Excitation and emission spectra of AJNDE15 emission peak in DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE15.

101
above the spectra. Based on the excitation spectrum shown in Figure 61, it seems unlikely that
390nm excitation can stimulate the 630nm emission observed. However, there is a significant
overlap between DGEBA-DETA emission and AJNDE15 excitation, shown in the triangular
region in Figure 61. A theory for the excitation of the combined spectra above-offset in Figure
61 is that 390nm excitation stimulates epoxy emission, which in turn excites the AJNDE15
emission at 630nm. Comparing the combined emission spectrum with the DGEBA-DETA
emission spectrum supports this conclusion – the emission is significantly decreased in the ~475-
525nm wavelengths, where AJNDE15 excitation would take place.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
200 300 400 500 600 700
Wavelength (nm)
epoxy emission
epoxy excitation
15 excitation
15 emission
15/epoxy emission 390nm
Figure 62: Excitation and emission spectra of epoxy and AJNDE15. Offset above - emission of DGEBA-
DETA-AJNDE15 due to excitation at 390nm.

102
3.3.2 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA – Uniaxial compression
Samples of .05wt% AJNDE15 in cured DGEBA-DETA with χ=1.5 were machined into 8
rectangular plates measuring ~10mmx10mmx1.5mm. Images of the plates were taken under
ambient light and in a darkroom under long-wave UV illumination, and spectra were collected
using 390nm UV illumination. The plates were then mechanically deformed in compression in
load control mode to varying final loads. A typical set of true stress-true strain curves for these
measurements is shown in Figure 63.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
TrueStress(MPa)
True Strain
sample 8 sample 7
sample 6 sample 5
sample 4 sample 2
sample 1
Figure 63: True stress-true strain curves for DGEBA-DETA compression samples.

103
After deformation, images and spectra were again collected. The before and after images are
shown in Figure 64, while the before and after spectra are shown in Figure 65. The dashed black
line is DGEBA-DETA fluorescence for reference. The true strain in samples was calculated by
measuring sample dimensions after removal from the testing apparatus. Any elastic deformation
will have relaxed immediately after the load is removed; this measurement therefore represents
the amount of εdef experienced by the samples.
The samples after mechanical deformation show a dramatic color change from clear pink to dark
red-purple. The fluorescent emission also changes dramatically from blue-white to red.
The spectra show that initially, AJNDE15 has fluorescent emission with two peaks at ~505nm
and ~630nm. After deformation, the emission at 505nm decreases in a general but not
monotonic way with increasing strain. The emission of DGEBA-DETA fluorescence does not
change greatly due to εdef (see Chapter 1section 4.3.3.3), so changes in this region are attributed
to AJNDE15. Based on the excitation and emission spectra results in Figure 61, this is attributed
Figure 64: AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA compression samples. a) Brightfield, before compression. b) UV
illuminated, before compression. c) Brightfield, after compression. d) UV illuminated, after compression.
left to right: sample 1 – sample 8, increasing εdef 0 to .36. See Figure 63 for stress strain curves.

104
to AJNDE15’s ON state absorbing a fraction of the fluorescence emitted by DGEBA-DETA.
The emission at 630nm increases dramatically as εdef increases, which is consistent with the
proposed OFF  ON transition with increasing strain.
Figure 66a shows the emission spectra normalized to the peak at 505nm, while Figure 66b shows
the R values for increasing εdef. The ratio of intensities at these wavelengths in DGEBA-DETA
with no AJNDE15 are also plotted for comparison, showing that very little change in this ratio
occurs in DGEBA-DETA as a result of increasing εdef. The increase in R with true strain is,
monotonic and one to one, suggesting that this approach is promising as a ratiometric probe for
quantitative measures of εdef.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
450 550 650 750
Intensity(counts)
Wavelength (nm)
s.1
s. 2
s. 3
s. 4
s. 5
s. 6
s. 7
s. 8
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
450 550 650 750
Intensity(counts)
Wavelength (nm)
0.007
0.103
0.139
0.156
0.257
0.26
0.332
0.359
a)
b)
Figure 65: Emission spectra of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA. a) before compression. b) after compression.
Legend in b) shows final true strain values.
a) b)

105
3.3.3 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA - Stoichiometry
Samples of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA with varying stoichiometry were made in the same
manner as described in Chapter 1 section 1.2. Absorbance spectra for various χ values were
collected via the method in section Chapter 1 section 2.2.3.1. The final absorbance spectra are
shown in Figure 67a, with the absorbance of the 564nm peak normalized to the absorbance of the
447nm peak in Figure 67b. The emission spectra collected via the spectrometer probe tip
method are shown in Figure 67c, with the absorbance of the 630nm peak normalized to the
absorbance of the 505nm peak in Figure 67d.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
450 550 650 750
Wavelength (nm)
0.007
0.103
0.139
0.156
0.257
0.261
0.331
0.359
R² = 0.9431
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
R
True Strain
AJNDE15
DGEBA-DETA
Figure 66: a) Normalized emission of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA χ=1.5 for increasing strains. b) R value for
AJNDE15 for increasing strains, with DGEBA-DETA for comparision.

106
The emission characteristics with respect to stoichiometry are consistent with the absorption
spectra. The relative intensity of the peak at 630nm decreases rapidly as χ increases, just as the
relative magnitude of the absorbance peak at 564nm decreases for increasing χ values. These
results suggest that the OFFON transition occurs during cure, and that increasing χ reduces the
extent of the transition.
3.3.4 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA - Elevated temperature
It was observed that AJNDE15 samples after room temperature cure in DGEBA-DETA
displayed dramatic changes in color and fluorescent emission when exposed to heat. To quantify
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
450 550 650 750
Wavelength (nm)
1
1.1
1.2
1.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1 1.5 2
A564/A447
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
375 475 575 675
Absorbance(normalized)
Wavelength (nm)
1
1.1
1.2
1.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
1 1.5 2
I630/I505
a) b)
Figure 67: a) Absorbance spectra for AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA. b) Ratio of 564nm absorbance
to 447nm absorbance for varying χ values. c) Emission spectra for AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA.
d) ratio of 630nm emission to 505nm emission for varying χ values.
d)c)

107
this, samples having varying χ values and .05wt% AJNDE15 were placed in a drying oven at
70ºC for 24 hours. Images of the samples were taken before and after exposure in ambient light
and in a darkroom under long-wave UV illumination. Spectra were collected with 390nm UV
illumination before and after exposure. The spectra of samples after exposure are shown in
Figure 68, and before and after images are displayed in Figure 69.
The color of samples clearly changes as a result of the heating from pink or clear to dark red-
purple in almost all cases. Fluorescent emission also changes, from mild red or blue emission to
strong red emission. The exception is for samples with χ=2.0. These samples change from clear
Figure 69: Samples of varying stoichiometry before and after heating. a) brightfield, before
heating. b) UV illuminated, before heating. c) Brightfield, after heating. d) UV illuminated,
after heating. All images left to right: χ=1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 2.0.
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
Intensity
Wavelength (nm)
AJNDE15 1.0
AJNDE15 1.1
AJNDE15 1.2
AJDNE15 1.5
AJNDE15 2.0
Figure 68: Emission spectra of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA after heating.

108
in color, and blue-white emission, to orange color and strong yellow emission. The spectra
quantify this observation. The emission spectra of all samples except that of χ=2.0 show a
dramatic increase in the emission of the peak at ~630nm. The sample of χ=2.0 shows a very
strong emission at ~530nm, which is not attributable to either of the observed AJNDE15
emission peaks, or the epoxy autofluorescence emission. A plot of R as a result of 24h exposure
at 70ºC for various stoichiometric ratios is shown in Figure 70. From this analysis it is clear that
samples of χ=1.5 shows the greatest magnitude of OFFON change as a result of heat at 70°C
as the external stimulus.
To begin probing the kinetics of the heat-based OFFON transition, a study of AJNDE15 at
χ=1.5 for various temperatures and time exposures was conducted. Temperatures from 40°C to
70°C and times from 1 to 10hr were chosen. The samples were imaged in brightfield and
fluorescence after exposure, and their spectra were measured before and after exposure. Figure
71a has the images after exposure, while Figure 71b has the R values for the samples for the
temperatures and times studied.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1 1.1 1.2 1.5
R
χ
Figure 70: R value for AJNDE15 OFF>ON transition
caused by heating.

109
There are three important observations that can be made from these measurements. The most
important point is that the OFFON transition due to temperature progresses further with
increasing temperature and increasing exposure times. The second is that temperature values as
low as 40ºC cause the transition to occur. And third is that the highest temperature exposures
cause initially high R values which are attenuated as exposure increases.
0
100
200
300
400
500
1hr 2hr 5hr 10hr
Temp
R
Exposure Time
40C
50C
60C
70C
40
C
50
C
40
C
60
C
70
C
50
C
60
C
70
C
1hr 2hr 5hr 10hr
Figure 71: a) top-brightfield images and bottom-fluorescence images of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA χ=1.5
after thermal exposure. b) R values of thermally exposed AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA χ=1.5.
a) b)

110
3.3.5 AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA - Time stability after deformation
It is important for the ultimate application of AJNDE15 as a mechanochromic probe molecule to
understand the stability of the OFFON transition after deformation. To explore this, a
rectangular plate specimen was deformed to strain of ~.40 and spectra were collected from 5
places on the plate. These tests were repeated every 24 hours for 300hr, and again at 500hr. The
resulting R values from the spectra are displayed against time in Figure 72.
From Figure 72 it is clear that the OFFON transition in AJNDE15 is not permanent – R
values decrease dramatically as time increases. A logarithmic model seems to fit the data rather
well; an explanation of this trend has yet to be established. Possible explanations include gradual
separation of aggregated dye molecules; progression of a degradation or ONOFF reaction; or
relaxation of strain-induced changes in free volume over long time periods.
R² = 0.9459
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
R
Time (hr)
Figure 72: Magnitude of OFF-->ON transition R of AJNDE15 vs. time after deformation.

111
4. CHARACTERIZATION OF AJNDE17 MECHANOCHROMISM
In this section results gathered from the testing of mechanochromic probe AJNDE17 will be
discussed. The general methods are very similar to the discussion of AJNDE15 and so the
results will be discussed by comparison with results from AJNDE15.
The probe AJNDE15 is designed to initially start in the ON state, then to react with a primary
amine to form the OFF state. This reaction occurred immediately upon mixing into DGEBA-
DETA, but during the cure process AJNDE15 returned to the ON state for samples with χ≤1.5.
Samples with χ=1.5 stoichiometry were unstable in the ON state after mechanical deformation.
As an attempt to stabilize the OFF state in cured DGEBA-DETA at balanced stoichiometries and
improve the stability of the ON state after deformation, the probe AJNDE17 was designed.
Probe AJNDE17 is designed with a similar structure to AJNDE15, but to begin in the OFF state,
where AJNDE15 began in the ON state. A schematic of AJNDE17 is shown in Figure 73.
With AJNDE17 beginning in the OFF state, the need for an amine to react with in order to turn
the probe OFF is removed. In theory, this should result in a more consistently OFF state after
curing, which would allow a more extensive OFFON transition due to mechanical
deformation.
Figure 73: AJNDE17 schematic.

112
AJNDE17 is received as a liquid in 50wt% solution with DETA. The solution is diluted with
DETA to the proper concentration, mixed with DGEBA, and cured as in 2.1.2. The change in
absorbance as cure progresses was very similar to AJNDE15 (see Figure 58), with a peak at
447nm that appears very rapidly and a peak at 564nm that develops more slowly. The major
difference between AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 in these measurements is the final ratio of peaks.
In AJNDE17, the 564nm peak has much lower absorbance after curing at χ=1, 1.1, and 1.2. This
suggests that the OFFON transition does not progress as far as in AJNDE15 for these
stoichiometries. Discussion of this result in more detail will follow in section 4.1.4.
4.1.2 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA – Uniaxial compression
Samples of .05wt% AJNDE17 were mixed with DGEBA-DETA of χ=1. Samples were then
cured, machined into plates and tested just as described for AJNDE15. For AJNDE17 however,
absorbance spectra were also collected after deformation. The absorbance and emission spectra
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
450 550 650 750
Wavelength (nm)
0.02
0.048
0.132
0.234
0.31
0.391
0.417
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
400 500 600 700 800
Absorbance
Wavelength (nm)
A .02
A .048
A .132
A .234
A .31
A .391
A .417
before
Figure 74: a) Absorbance of .05wt% AJNDE17 after compression. b) Fluorescent Emission of AJNDE17
(390nm illumination).
b)a)

113
are shown in Figure 74. Absorbance spectra have been offset to align the background
absorbance at 850nm; emission spectra have been normalized to the emission intensity at 505nm.
In Figure 74a, the absorbance peak at 564nm clearly grows stronger as εdef increases. There
appears to be an isosbestic point in the visible region of the absorbance spectra, at ~490nm,
indicating that a reaction may be occurring between absorbing species in this energy region such
as the OFFON reaction. The emission spectra in Figure 74b, just as in AJNDE15, show a
clear increase in the ratio of emission intensities R (see Eqn. 10) as εdef increases. While the
maximum R experienced is not as high as in AJNDE15 χ=1.5, the requirement of balanced
stoichiometry has been satisfied. Figure 75a has a plot of the change in absorbance value at
565nm, while Figure 75b has a plot of the R ratio change of AJNDE17in DGEBA-DETA χ=1
emission as compared to AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA χ=1.5 and DGEBA-DETA χ=1 emission.
R² = 0.958
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.1
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Absorbance
True Strain
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
R
True Strain
AJNDE15 1-1.5
AJNDE17 1-1
DGEBA-DETA
Figure 75: a) absorbance change at 565nm of AJNDE17 .05wt% for changing true strain. b) R value of
AJNDE17 χ=1 for increasing true strain compared to AJNDE15 χ=1.5 and DGEBA-DETA χ=1.
a) b)

114
The response of both absorbance and emission change with respect to sample true strain is highly
linear.
4.1.2.1 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA – Extended study in uniaxial compression
Over the course of the research into AJNDE17, many samples were deformed in uniaxial
compression. The simple linear relationship suggested by plots in Figure 72 and Figure 75 may
not sufficiently explain the response of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 to εdef.
The data shows a general increase in R (see Eqn. 10) for increasing εdef. A simple linear
trendline shows limited correlation with the data. It appears that the fit is too high in the middle
range of εdef and too low in the highest range of εdef. An alternative linear fit, dividing the data at
εdef = .15, appears to fit the data more closely. Figure 76b shows this alternative fit.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
R
Deformation Strain
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
R
Deformation Strain
Figure 76: R vs deformation strain for samples of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 - a) simple linar fit. b) two-step
linear fit divided at εdef ~ .15.

115
This result shows the viability of the DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 system as a ratiometric
fluorescent probe system for deformation. The divided plot in Figure 76b suggests a change in
behavior at εdef ~.15, which is consistent with changes in behavior of εan, εpl, and ΔUdef.
4.1.3 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA – Hydrostatic pressure
The spectra of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 samples loaded in hydrostatic pressure are presented
in Figure 77a below. The addition of hydrostatic stress does not activate the OFFON reaction,
even at stresses well above the σyield displayed by DGEBA-DETA. Figure 77b shows the R
value plotted against the hydrostatic stress experienced by the samples. Uniaxial compression to
stresses well below 100MPa causes R values of 100 or more (see Figure 72); hydrostatic
pressure causes no activation. From literature studies, it has been determined that hydrostatic
pressure produces no εdef, causes no intermolecular shear motion, and adds no ΔUdef to the
internal energy of a glassy polymer (29) (36).
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 100 200 300 400
R
Pressure (MPa)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
400 500 600 700
Intensity(raw)
Wavelength (nm)
as cast
77MPa
232 MPa
348 MPa
Figure 77: DGEBA -DETA-AJNDE17 response to hydrostatic pressure - a) emission spectra b)R vs pressure.
a) b)

116
4.1.4 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA - Stoichiometry
An aspect of AJNDE15 that was unsatisfactory for the ultimate application was the requirement
that excess amine stoichiometries were required to prevent the probe from turning ON during
cure (see Figure 67). The probe AJNDE17 was developed to begin in the OFF state, removing
the deactivation step from the AJNDE15 process. In theory, AJNDE17 will remain in the OFF
state during and after cure more than AJNDE15.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0.5 1 1.5 2
A564/A442
AJNDE15
AJNDE17
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
375 475 575 675
Absorbance(normalized)
Wavelength (nm)
1
1.1
1.2
1.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0.5 1 1.5 2
I630/I505
AJNDE15
AJNDE17
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
450 550 650 750
Wavelength (nm)
AJNDE17 1.0
AJNDE17 1.1
AJNDE17 1.2
AJNDE17 1.5
Figure 78: AJNDE17 stoichiometry variation. a) Absorbance after curing. b) ratio of absorbance peaks at 447 and
564nm for AJNDE15 and AJNDE17. c) Emission after curing. d) ratio of emission intensity for peaks at 630 and
505nm for AJNDE17 and AJNDE15.
c) d)
a)
b)

117
Figure 78a shows the absorbance data after 24 hours of curing for AJNDE17. Figure 78b shows
the ratio of the 564nm peak absorbance to the 447nm peak absorbance for AJNDE17 and
AJNDE15 for comparison. Figure 78c shows the emission data for AJNDE17, and Figure 78d
shows the ratio of the emission intensity at 630nm compared to the intensity at 505nm for
AJNDE17 and AJNDE15 for comparison.
It is clear that AJNDE17 after curing has much lower ON character than AJNDE15 at all χ
values, demonstrating the improvement in sensitivity to stoichiometry over AJNDE15. It is
especially important to note the large reduction in ON character at χ=1, which is the preferred
stoichiometry for aerospace applications.
4.1.5 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA - Elevated temperature
In Figure 68 (Chapter 2, section 3.3.3), the emission spectra of AJNDE15 were presented for
temperature exposures of 70°C. A sample of .05wt% AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA with χ=1
was exposed to 70°C for 2 hours, and its absorbance and emission spectra were collected before
and after exposure. These are shown in Figure 79a and b, with absorbance spectra offset to 0A at
850nm and emission spectra normalized to the 505nm peak intensity. It is clear that AJNDE17
at χ=1 shows some sensitivity to temperature despite the modifications made to improve the
temperature stability.

118
After 70ºC exposure for 2hr, the R value for the OFFON transition is 539, which is
comparable to R for AJNDE15 at similar exposures (R=461, see Figure 71).
4.1.6 AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA - Time stability after deformation
AJNDE17 was designed to be more stable in the ON state after mechanical deformation. For
evaluation, a sample was prepared and tested just as in the AJNDE15 case. The results of
AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 R ratio changes with respect to time after deformation are shown in
Figure 80. Again, while initial performance of AJNDE15 1-1.5 is much higher, AJNDE17
shows more consistent temporal stability. A line fits the data well instead of a logarithmic
decay; as well, after 200hr the AJNDE17 R value is significantly higher than AJNDE15’s.
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
400 500 600 700 800
Absorbance(A)
Wavelength (nm)
before
70C 2hr
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
400 500 600 700 800
Wavelength (nm)
before
70C 2hr
Figure 79: AJNDE17 response to 70°C exposure. a) Absorbance spectra. b) emission spectra.
a) b)b)

119
5. EVALUATION OF MECHANOCHROMIC MECHANISMS
In this section the mechanochromic behavior of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 will be discussed in
the context of the four established mechanisms outlined in Chapter 2 section 1.1, along with the
proposed mechanism specific to these probes. The results obtained so far will be analyzed to
determine whether they support an interpretation of probe behavior based on the mechanisms
above. Where necessary, concepts will be reviewed or introduced. Future experiments to
provide more evidence in support of each mechanism and the results expected if that mechanism
is the governing one will be described.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
R
Time (hr)
AJNDE15 1-1.5
AJNDE17 1-1
Figure 80: AJNDE15 χ=1.5 and AJNDE17 χ=1 R value vs. time after deformation.

120
5.1 Aggregation-based approach
If AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 are mechanochromic through the aggregation-based mechanism,
their response is based on molecules’ proximity to one another. Deformation of the samples
would change this proximity, which would change the fluorescence response by promoting or
demoting aggregates.
5.1.1 Curing
Excimer forming molecules can be highly sensitive to the conditions around them, whether
liquid or solid. The polarity of the solvent has a large effect on the formation of excimers (76;
77). The viscosity of the surrounding medium can also affect the ability of excimers to form
(59). In the case of AJNDE15, the aggregation hypothesis asserts that the dimer species absorbs
at 564nm and emits at 630nm. During DGEBA-DETA curing, the dielectric constant decreases
(78; 79), while the viscosity initially decreases and then greatly increases (59). Both of these
could account for the observed increase in dimer absorbance under the aggregation-based probe
hypothesis.
5.1.2 Mechanical deformation & hydrostatic pressure
Aggregation is a process that usually results in emission of lower energy fluorescence from
dimers than from monomers. In our case, the emission of AJNDE15 and 17 shows two distinct
peaks at 505nm and 630nm. Uniaxial compression causes a decrease of the higher energy
emission at 505nm, and an increase of the lower energy emission at 630nm. This is consistent
with an aggregation based probe, where compression would force molecules closer together and
thus promote dimer formation and emission of the highest-wavelength species. The observation
that the OFFON transition when quantified by the R value is linear with εdef is also consistent

121
with aggregation based behavior. An aggregation based probe would be insensitive to the
different phases of deformation (elastic, strain-softening, or strain-hardening) and would be
expected to respond linearly to permanent deformation εdef. Hydrostatic pressure would cause no
εdef and therefore cause no activation of an aggregation-based probe.
5.1.3 Stoichiometry
Based on the mechanical deformation response, the interpretation under consideration is that
AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 are aggregation based, and that 630nm emission from the ON state is
characteristic of dimer emission. The changing responses of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA of
varying stoichiometry suggest that increasing the amine content either inhibits dimer formation
or promotes monomer formation. The polymer network in its glassy state becomes denser with
increasing χ (see Chapter 2 section 1.2.2) but this would seem to promote dimer formation if it
would affect aggregation at all.
An interpretation that may explain this behavior and fit the aggregation hypothesis is the polarity
of the network. Aggregation is a phenomenon that is highly affected by polarity, which changes
as the DGEBA-DETA network cures (75). It is logical that increasing χ would change the
polarity as well.
5.1.4 Elevated temperature
The aggregation-based probe hypothesis is not supported by AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 behavior
when exposed to elevated temperature. Exposure to 70ºC is above the glass transition
temperature for some stoichiometric ratios of DGEBA-DETA (see Figure 22) and not for others,
but the activation of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 appears to occur strongly for samples
independently of Tg. If Tg<70ºC, temperature exposure above Tg could cause cure to progress

122
further, which according to the absorbance measurements taken during cure might cause more
absorbance of dimer characteristics. But this would not agree with the result of section 3.3.3,
where increasing χ inhibits dimer formation, because increasing χ also causes the cure reaction to
progress further (see Figure 22 and Figure 24).
Other researchers using aggregation based mechanochromic probes in solid polymers have
noticed that temperature exposure promoted aggregation (80; 81). They have attributed this to
the probe molecules being kinetically trapped in the thermodynamically unstable monomer state
when samples were quenched from liquid melts to solids. After annealing above Tg, when
molecular chain motion becomes allowed, the molecules were able to approach one another
again and form nanoscale aggregates. This behavior was observed to follow Johnson-Mehl-
Avrami-Kolmogorov transformation kinetics, and was described by equation 11
⁄ 12
where Im and Ie are the intensities of monomer and dimer emission, Im∞ and Ie∞ are the intensities
at equilibrium, A is a reaction rate constant, and τ the exponential time constant (80). The
exponential time rate constant τ was shown to follow the temperature above Tg (T-Tg), however,
and annealing below the glass transition caused no change in aggregation (80). This is in
contrast with our observations that temperature exposure below Tg causes activation of probes
AJNDE15 and AJNDE17.
5.1.5 Time stability
The time stability after deformation of AJNDE15 suggests that in the aggregation hypothesis,
molecules that formed dimers when compressed eventually formed monomers over a long time

123
scale. The formation of dimers is caused by mechanical deformation, which on a macroscopic
scale is permanent. The relaxation of anelastic strain εan could provide the molecular motion
possible to break up dimer formation. But based on the OFFON transition observed during
cure, molecular motion should move the reaction toward the ON state, not OFF state. Based on
the hypothesis that aggregation is caused solely by plastic deformation, the decay of AJNDE15
fluorescence after initial deformation cannot be explained adequately. These results are
inconsistent with the aggregation based theory.
5.1.6 Summary of aggregation approach
The aggregation based approach is not sufficient to completely explain the response of
AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 to all of the conditions the probes have experienced in this study. The
changes observed during cure are consistent with the hypothesis, as changing polarity and
viscosity could change an aggregation probe’s response. The probes’ responses to mechanical
deformation and hydrostatic pressure are consistent with an aggregation mechanism. Varying
the stoichiometry of DGEBA-DETA causes changes in probe behavior that are not explained by
aggregation alone, but could be due to changes in polarity affecting the aggregation state. But
the probes’ temperature exposure response is not consistent with an aggregation-based probe
mechanism. The time stability of AJNDE15 over time is also inconsistent with an aggregation
based approach.
5.2 Intramolecular approach
If AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 are mechanochromic through an intramolecular mechanism, then
their mechanochromic response will be sensitive to the free volume of the polymer and any
changes to it. The hypothesis of this interpretation that the OFFON transition of AJNDE15

124
and AJNDE17 is based on a permanent isomerization or TICT transition which requires some
finite level of free volume in which to occur. If this is indeed the case, increasing free volume
hole sizes will allow more of the probes to transition to the ON state, or for the rate of transition
to increase. A discussion of the preliminary results and comparison to previous work
characterizing the response of epoxy free volume to various external stimuli will be presented,
outlining the results and their support for this hypothesis.
5.2.1 Curing
As a mixture of DGEBA and DETA monomers cures, the free volume decreases from extremely
high values to the small volume hole sizes described in literature. Other studies using
fluorescent probe molecules using the intramolecular isomer approach have observed this quite
extensively in amine-cured epoxies (55; 82). In our results, AJNDE15 turns ON during the cure
of DGEBA-DETA. This is inconsistent with the interpretation of our hypothesis based on the
mechanical deformation results, which asserted that increasing free volume hole size promoted
AJNDE15’s ON state.
Mechanical deformation of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA by uniaxial compression caused the
transition from OFF to ON state. Hydrostatic pressure caused no activation. Based on these
results, AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 as intramolecular, free-volume sensitive probes, would be
expected to turn ON when free volume hole size increases.
Mechanical deformation at different stages of the stress-strain curve and its effect on the free
volume has been studies in glassy polymer systems, but not in epoxy to our knowledge. A work
that studied PTFE and PE glassy polymers showed an increase in free volume hole size in the

125
elastic and strain-softening stages, but a slightly decreasing or constant hole size in the strain
hardening region (83). Studies in PMMA showed also that hole size linearly increased until the
onset of strain hardening, after which hole size remained constant (84). A study in
polycarbonate actually reported a decrease in free volume hole size due to compression, but an
increase due to tension (85). Hydrostatic pressure caused a decrease in free volume hole size and
in the number of free volume holes in epoxy (62).
The results of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA in hydrostatic pressure testing are
consistent with a free volume interpretation. But in uniaxial compression, samples show a
response to increasing εdef that can increases well into the strain hardening region. This is not
consistent with free volume measurements in other polymer systems.
5.2.3 Stoichiometry
Several works have shown that free volume in cured epoxy samples varies as the stoichiometric
ratio is changed (86; 87). In what may be counterintuitive, the samples with the highest
measured overall free volume in the glassy state are samples with balanced stoichiometry (χ=1).
This has been attributed to the highest degree of crosslinking and least number of dangling chain
ends allowing the least amount of rotation and movement of chain segments between crosslinks
(86). However, research directly measuring hole volumes suggests that while samples with the
highest crosslink density have the highest overall free volume, they also have the lowest free
volume hole size. In work from reference (87), which took Tg as a measurement of degree of
cure and equated degree of cure with crosslink density, samples with the lowest crosslinks had
the highest free volume hole sizes. A plot of the average free volume hole radius for varying
degrees of conversion is shown in Figure 81, showing a decrease in hole size up to a point after
which the hole size remains constant. Samples with increasing χ values showed increasing

126
degree of cure in DSC measurements (see Chapter 2 sec. 1.2), so would have decreasing hole
size. However, increasing χ above 1 will also decrease the crosslink density, which will increase
the hole size (86). It is unclear which would be the dominant trend in our system.
The results of AJNDE15 probe behavior in DGEBA-DETA with varying stoichiometric ratios
suggests that increasing the amine content drives the probes toward the OFF state. The literature
on free volume hole size suggests that increasing degree of cure causes a decrease in hole size,
but that decreasing crosslink density causes an increase in hole size. Since increasing amine
content causes both increasing degree of cure and decreasing crosslink density, more
observations are necessary to evaluate the response of AJNDE15 in samples of varying
stoichiometry.
Figure 81: Free volume hole radius in epoxy for varying degree
of conversion (see discussion for details). From (86).

127
The free volume changes with respect to temperature are more complex and are very dependent
on whether the sample is in the glassy or rubbery state. If the epoxy is below Tg, increases in
temperature causes a small increase in hole radius. If the epoxy is above Tg, the average hole
radius increases at a much higher rate, with a broadening of the hole volume distribution towards
the highest hole volumes. Figure 82a has the average hole radius plotted against the sample
temperature with respect to Tg, showing the two trends above and below the glass transition (data
from (88), trendlines added). Figure 82b has the hole volume distribution functions as
temperature increases, showing the distributions broadening to higher hole volumes.
In Chapter 2 section 3.3.4, heating samples cured at room temperature to 70ºC caused a
transition from AJNDE15’s OFF state to ON state. Free volume measurements of epoxy showed
that above Tg, average hole size increases, which is consistent with our interpretation of
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3
3.1
-60 -10 40 90 140
Meanholeradius(A)
T-Tg
above Tg
below Tg
a) b)
Figure 82: a) Free volume hole radius vs. (T-Tg) in epoxy. b) Free volume hole volume distribution
for varying temperatures (Tg=62ºC). Data from (88) – trendlines in a)added by current author.

128
AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 as turning ON with increasing free volume hole size. The kinetic
study of AJNDE15 is also consistent with the free volume hole size dependence interpretation,
with free volume hole size increasing even below the Tg of the epoxy.
Studies have shown that hydrostatic pressure causes a decrease in free volume hole size. When
the pressure was removed, holes expanded again to nearly their original sizes over a period of 10
days (62). The increase in hole size due to plastic deformation and its stability over time have to
our knowledge not been studied in epoxy. This could serve to explain the decrease in ON state
activity over time, if the free volume is also decreasing over time.
At room temperature, the relaxation of εan over time may help to explain the transition of
AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 to the OFF state.
5.2.6 Summary of intramolecular isomer approach
The mechanical deformation of DGEBA-DETA in uniaxial compression causes free volume
holes to increase in size according to other researchers’ work using PALS. With this in mind, if
AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 are isomeric probes, and mechanical deformation has activated them,
they are preferentially activated by an increase in the free volume hole size. This interpretation
is inconsistent with the observations made during the cure of DGEBA-DETA, which turns
AJNDE15 ON while dramatically decreasing the free volume. The hypothesis is consistent with
the temperature results, because free volume hole size in epoxy increases with temperature both
below and above Tg. It is unclear whether the probes’ behavior in DGEBA-DETA of different
stoichiometries is consistent or inconsistent with this theory -the convolution of hole size

129
increase due to increased conversion and hole size decrease due to decreased crosslink density
makes drawing a strong conclusion difficult.
5.3 Mechanochemical reaction approach
In this hypothesis, fluorescence in the probes is activated by a chemical reaction which is caused
or aided by mechanical energy imparted to the system. The mechanical energy lowers the
activation energy barrier required for the reaction to proceed.
5.3.1 Curing
Our hypothesis that AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 are mechanochemical reaction probes suggests
that the OFFON transition is caused by a reaction similar to spiropyran-merocyanine.
Unreacted amines present in DGEBA-DETA during curing could be preventing the reaction
from occurring in an effect similar to solvatochromism in the spiropyran-merocyanine reaction,
which in liquids is highly sensitive to the polarity of the solvent environment (89; 90). This is
supported by our findings that AJNDE15 dissolved in DETA liquid displays no purple color,
while in DGEBA it shows strong color. In blends of solvents, in which a solvatochromic
molecule is highly active in one and inactive in the other, the fluorescent activity varies with the
concentration of solvents (91). This is also consistent with the results gathered for AJNDE15
during curing.
The activation of AJNDE15 and AJND17 in DGEBA-DETA under uniaxial compression
suggests the hypothesis that the energy from compressive deformation to this degree is sufficient
to reduce the activation energy to the point that the system has enough thermal energy to activate

130
at room temperature. This is consistent with the mechanochemical reaction hypothesis. The
measurements of hydrostatic pressure are also consistent - hydrostatic pressure has been shown
to impart no internal energy to glassy polymer samples and would therefore produce no
OFFON transition.
The R ratio’s linear relationship with εdef suggests that energy is imparted to the system in a
monotonic manner with increasing εdef. The ∆Udef as measured in DSC is decidedly non-linear
with εdef (34). The probe molecule environment may not correspond well with the measurable
quantities εdef or ∆Udef, however.
5.3.3 Stoichiometry
The results gathered from stoichiometric variation of the DGEBA-DETA matrix surrounding
AJNDE15 are consistent with the mechanochemical reaction hypothesis. Increasing amine
content causes AJNDE15 to express more OFF character; in this hypothesis this means that the
energy barrier to the ON state is changing as amine content increases. This could be explained
by a solvatochromic interaction. The samples of AJNDE15 in DGEBA-DETA with χ>1 have
unreacted amines, which could change the overall polarity of the bulk polymer. This could
inhibit the OFFON reaction, accounting for the decrease in color and fluorescence in cured
samples with χ>1.5.
When the samples are exposed to heat, the energy barrier is overcome by the added thermal
energy and the reaction is allowed to proceed to completion in this hypothesis. This is consistent
with the results we have gathered for thermal exposure of AJNDE15 in different stoichiometries
of DGEBA-DETA.

131
The results gathered from exposure to temperature for AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 are consistent
with the mechanochemical reaction theory. Exposure to elevated temperatures increases the rate
of the OFFON reaction, regardless of the glass transition of the material surrounding the probe
molecules. The results of the kinetic study of AJNDE15 are also consistent with the
mechanochemical reaction theory. Higher temperatures and longer times cause increasing
OFFON activity, suggesting a reaction rate which obeys Arrhenius laws. Exposure to low
temperatures such as 40ºC causes the OFFON transition, which suggests that the activation
energy barrier is small. This is consistent with the uniaxial compression results, which suggest
that the energy imparted by εdef is sufficient to lower the energy barrier to a point where room
temperature can activate the reaction.
The mechanochemical hypothesis suggests that the OFFON transition is caused by a reaction,
which mechanical energy makes easier. The time stability of AJNDE15 after the OFFON
transition suggests that this reaction is not permanent – that over long periods of time there is a
reversal of the reaction back to the OFF state, or a further reaction to some non-fluorescent state.
The kinetic study of AJNDE15 at the highest temperatures and exposure times shows a decrease
in R values from the initial activation. In addition, evidence of a degradation reaction to some
product that emits at 530nm for the highest amine content samples was observed for temperature
exposures of AJNDE15. Whether the time study is evidence of an ONOFF transition, or of a
degradation of the ON state to the yellow-emitting product is not clear, but both would account
for the decreasing R values as time increases. These measurements suggest at the least that the
OFFON transition is not permanent, which would make the decay of the R value with time

132
certainly possible under this hypothesis. Further characterization is required, but the current
observations are consistent with the mechanochemical hypothesis.
5.3.6 Summary of mechanochemical approach
The hypothesis that a mechanochemical reaction is causing the OFFON transition of
AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 is consistent with all of the currently observed measurements.
The mechanical deformation of DGEBA-DETA around the probe molecules reduces the
activation energy barrier for the OFFON reaction, which allows the reaction to proceed at
room temperatures. The linearity of the response with εdef is not clearly explained, but the
transfer of bulk mechanical strain energy to the probe molecule is also not fully understood .
The behavior of AJNDE15 in the liquid components DGEBA and DETA support the
mechanochemical interpretation, as does the observations during curing of the absorbance
changes of AJNDE15. The changing polarity of DGEBA-DETA during cure (75; 78) could have
a solvatochromic effect, which has been observed for other mechanochemical reactions (89).
The exposure of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 to elevated temperatures increases the rate at which
the OFFON reaction proceeds. A kinetic study of AJNDE15 supported this interpretation-
increasing temperatures and exposure times causing an increase in the extent of the OFFON
transition, consistent with Arrhenius-type reaction rate behavior.
Variation of the stoichiometry of DGEBA-DETA around AJNDE15 showed a decrease in ON
state character as amine content increased. This is consistent with the mechanochemical reaction
theory if the reaction has solvatochromic characteristics, which other mechanochemical reactions
like spiropyran-merocyanine have shown (89).

133
The time stability of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 after activation is consistent with the
mechanochemical hypothesis on the condition that the reaction is either reversible or that another
reaction to a degraded state is possible. Evidence for one or both of these possibilities is seen in
the kinetic study of AJNDE15, where the highest temperature exposures showed an initial high
increase, then a decrease in the R value of the transition as exposure time increased. Evidence
for the degradation of AJNDE15’s ON state is also seen by the formation of a yellow-emitting
product during elevated temperature exposure of AJNDE15 at the highest amine-containing
stoichiometry.
5.4 Chain scission approach
In this approach, fluorescence is activated in molecules by chain scission, which is caused by a
crack preferentially propagating through a bond that when broken cause the OFFON
transition. A method in the literature was demonstrated where the broken bond separated two
aggregated probes into their fluorescent monomer configuration. If a similar mechanism is
causing AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 mechanochromism, crack formation should demonstrably
change the fluorescence behavior.
Microcrack formation is observed in DGEBA-DETA samples under compression, so this
mechanism is theoretically possible. A detailed investigation of crack formation and its relation
to AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 has not been performed, however.
Curing of DGEBA-DETA would not be expected to cause microcracking of the solid polymer.
But the mechanism for scission-based mechanochromism has been based on aggregation in other
work (70; 71). Aggregation based probes can be highly sensitive to polarity and viscosity, which
change dramatically during cure (see Chapter 2 section 5.1.1). So a mechanism dependent on

134
crack propagation separating excimers into monomers could certainly display the observed
behavior of AJNDE15 during cure.
It is conceivable that an elevated temperature exposure could introduce enough thermal energy
into the AJNDE15-DGEBA-DETA system to break the bonds that would activate fluorescence
in the probe molecule. This scenario would have the same result as the mechanochemical
reaction, where elevated temperature causes the OFFON transition of AJNDE15.
More research is required to determine what, if any, effect the stoichiometry of a solid polymer
might have on the bond strength or scission behavior of a specific bond. Aggregation dependent
scission based mechanisms might show sensitivity to stoichiometry based on the polarity of the
samples with high χ values.
5.5 Proposed mechanism – Conjugation pathway interference
The proposed mechanism for AJNDE15 and ANDE17mechanochromism is based on a reaction
between the probe molecule and an amine functional group. Mechanical force promotes the
dissociation of a C-N bond, which when removed connects a conjugation pathway between a
donor and acceptor group and activates fluorescence. To review this mechanism, the figures of
the OFFON and ONOFF reactions are displayed again in Figure 83.
Figure 83: top: proposed OFF-->ON transition for AJNDE15 and AJNDE17. bottom: proposed OFF-->On
transition for AJNDE15 and AJNDE17.

135
5.5.1 Curing
The response of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 during DGEBA-DETA cure is consistent with the
conjugation pathway approach. After mixing, AJNDE15 shows low absorbance from the ON
species, indicating that it has been turned OFF during mixing with liquid DGEBA-DETA by the
reaction with the primary amine groups of DETA. As curing progresses, these amine groups are
consumed by reaction with DGEBA, which is competitive with the ONOFF reaction.
Eventually DGEBA begins to remove the amine groups from AJNDE15, turning it ON. The
relative ratio of ON to OFF absorbance and emission after cure shows that AJNDE15 remains
OFF in the presence of excess amines, which is consistent with the proposed mechanism.
AJNDE17 shows similar behavior during cure as AJNDE15, with ON absorbance increasing as
cure progresses. (see Figure 59). However, the amount of ON character after cure is much
lower than AJNDE15 due to the molecule starting in the OFF state instead of the ON state (see
Figure 78).
5.5.2 Uniaxial compression & hydrostatic pressure
The response of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 to uniaxial compression is consistent with the
proposed mechanism, where mechanical force encourages the dissociation of the C-N bond that
is inhibiting fluorescence. Increasing εdef causes more ON activity in both AJNDE15 and
AJNDE17. The bond dissociation process described in the mechanochemical reaction
mechanism appears to be appropriate in this situation as well, with the amine-probe bond
dissociation being promoted by the addition of mechanical energy, but ultimately being activated
by thermal energy. If this is true, mechanical energy added to the bulk polymer must be applied

136
to the probe molecule efficiently enough to reduce the activation temperature of the C-N
dissociation below room temperature. This is conceivable based on the elevated temperature
kinetics study of AJNDE15, which shows significant OFFON activity at as low as 40°C (see
Figure 71).
5.5.3 Stoichiometry
The effect of varying stoichiometries on AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 is consistent with the
proposed mechanism. The OFF state of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 requires the presence of an
unreacted amine group, which suggests that increasing amine content would produce more of the
OFF state after curing. This is consistent with the results gathered for absorbance and emission
of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 (see Figure 67 and Figure 78).
An alternative interpretation is based on the time that the OFFON reaction is allowed to
proceed during cure. Increasing χ increases (see Figure 24), reducing the time before the
onset of gelation and diffusion control. If the reaction is only allowed to proceed during times
when some molecular motion is possible, the reduced time before gelation would allow less ON
state to form.
The response of AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 to elevated temperatures is also consistent with the
proposed conjugation pathway mechanism. Increasing temperatures would impart energy to the
system which could be used to dissociate bonds. The C-N bond would be the first to dissociate
based on its low bond energy, turning the probe molecules ON. The dissociation process appears
to follow Arrhenius-type rate law behavior in AJNDE15 kinetics studies at low temperatures,
with longer exposures and higher temperatures causing increased OFFON transition (see

137
Figure 71). The kinetics study suggests that at the highest temperatures studied, the OFFON
transition magnitude decreases as time exposure increases. This study was performed in
DGEBA-DETA with χ=1.5, so there are excess amines available which could react with
AJNDE15’s ON state to turn it back OFF. The high temperatures and excess amines available
could promote this transition in this case.
The observations of decreasing OFF state over long time periods of AJNDE15 after deformation,
and the less prevalent decrease of AJNDE17, are consistent with the proposed mechanism of
conjugation pathway interference. After deformation, the probes are in the ON state.
Observations from the kinetic temperature study of AJNDE15 suggest the possibility of the ON
state reacting with excess unreacted amine to form the OFF state in solid DGEBA-DETA. In
these measurements, AJNDE15 samples had χ =1.5, while AJNDE17 had χ=1. After sufficiently
long time, it is conceivable that the AJNDE15 ON state turned OFF by reacting with the excess
amine, while AJNDE17 samples had much less unreacted amines available for the reaction.
5.5.6 Summary of mechanochromic mechanisms
The mechanochemical reaction mechanism is consistent with all of the observations made at this
point. In this mechanism AJNDE15 and AJNDE17’s OFFON transition is caused by a
reaction, which mechanical deformation promotes by lowering the activation energy barrier. The
effect of temperature is consistent, along with the effect of amine ratio if some solvatochromic
character is postulated for the probes or if the reaction cannot proceed without the freedom for
molecular motion.

138
The aggregation based mechanism is consistent with the observations made for mechanical
deformation and for stoichiometric variation. However, temperature should only promote dimer
formation at temperatures above Tg, which is inconsistent with the temperature observations
made thus far. The time stability of AJNDE15 is also inconsistent with this theory.
The intramolecular isomer approach is consistent with the observation that mechanical
deformation increases free volume hole size, which would increase probe fluorescence activity.
However, some dependence should be observed on the section of the stress-strain curve in which
the deformation takes place. This is either not present or not clearly observable in the data
collected thus far. This mechanism is consistent with the temperature measurements – elevated
temperatures expand free volume holes both below and above Tg. It is unclear if the
stoichiometric variation measurements support or contradict this mechanism. More study is
needed to explain the time stability results with respect to this model.
The scission-based approach has not been fully evaluated in this study. Preliminary
investigations showed the appearance of microcracking at high εdef but these studies have not
been advanced further.
The proposed mechanism of conjugation pathway interference is consistent with all the
measurements made thus far. The mechanism has many similarities to the mechanochemical
reaction mechanism.
5.6 Summary of mechanochromic mechanism evaluation
A series of fluorescent probe molecules has been synthesized which displays mechanochromic
properties in a structural amine-cured epoxy, DGEBA-DETA. To our knowledge,
mechanochromism has not before been demonstrated in a structural polymer such as amine-

139
cured epoxy. This chapter is an attempt to characterize the mechanism by which the probe
molecules AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 display mechanochromism. A comprehensive analysis of
DGEBA-DETA was performed to separate its response to mechanical deformation, elevated
temperature, and stoichiometry variation from the probes’ responses. Analysis techniques were
developed to quantify the OFFON response of the probes due to external stimulus. Four
previously reported mechanochromic mechanisms and the proposed mechanism for these probes
are evaluated based on their compatibility with the observed probe responses to mechanical
deformation, curing, elevated temperature exposure, and time stability of probe fluorescence
after deformation. The proposed mechanism and the mechanochemical reaction-based
mechanism are identified as being consistent with all of the observations thus far. The results of
these discussions have been summarized in Table 5.
Table 5: Summary of Mechanochromic Mechanisms for AJNDE15 and AJNDE17.
The combination of conjugation interference and mechanochemical reaction will be the reaction
model that is evaluated in Chapter 3.
Compression Hydrostatic Curing Stoichiometry Temperature Time
Aggregation consistent consistent consistent indeterminate inconsistent inconsistent
Intramolecular
Isomer
consistent/indet. consistent inconsistent inconsistent consistent indeterminate
Mechanochemical consistent consistent consistent consistent consistent consistent
Scission Based consistent consistent indeterminate indeterminate indeterminate indeterminate
Conjugation Int. consistent consistent consistent consistent consistent consistent

140
CHAPTER 3
MODELING AND KINETICS OF MECHANOCHROMISM
1. INTRODUCTION
In this chapter three models relating the OFFON reaction of AJNDE17 to the mechanical
behavior of DGEBA-DETA described in Chapter 1 will be presented. In addition, the kinetics
evaluation techniques used to evaluate the mechanochromic reaction of AJNDE17 will be
discussed. The relevant equations and assumptions will be discussed, and theoretical models of
the expected behaviors will be presented. The merits of these models will be compared with
experimental results in subsequent sections.
To analyze the kinetics of the ONOFF reaction of probe molecule AJNDE17 in DGEBA-
DETA in response to heat and deformation, some assumptions will be required. The validity of
these assumptions is of varying degree. After presenting these assumptions, the reaction order
equations used to determine various kinetic constants will be discussed.
2. MODEL FRAMEWORK FOR PROBE BEHAVIOR
The discussion of the behavior of probe molecule AJNDE17 in solid DGEBA-DETA must have
a grounding in some physical trend, and a model that is able to encapsulate that trend should be
applicable. This research will focus on the applicability of one such model - the Zhurkov model
for mechanochemical reactions. The model’s agreement with observations will be discussed in
Chapter 3 section 5.

141
2.1 Zhurkov model
This section presents a model for probe behavior based on the work of S.N. Zhurkov, who
investigated the mechanochemical properties of chain scission in polymers (92). Using
techniques such as FTIR and electron spin resonance, he analyzed the byproducts of polymer
fracture and their interaction with overall stress on the solid. His work developed a model of
bond scission that has been applied to many fracture scenarios in solids, especially
mechanochemical processes like stress-activated photochemical degradation in polymer coatings
(93; 94). The most important concept in the Zhurkov model is that bond scission is a thermally
activated event, with an associated activation energy barrier (95). This activation barrier can be
lowered when mechanical work is done on the bond being studied, making the scission of the
bond more likely to occur. The Zhurkov equation encapsulates this relationship with a modified
Arrhenius rate law:
13
Here K is the rate of bond scission, K0 is a rate constant, EA is the activation energy for bond
scission, α is a constant sometimes called the activation volume, and σ is the applied stress, R is
the gas constant, and T the temperature. The term ασ in the exponential is a measure of the
mechanical work done on the bond due to the applied stress, and serves to reduce the effective
activation energy Ea.
This model may be applicable to our probe behavior by determining conditions for the scission
of the C-N bond linking AJNDE17 to the epoxy network, which inhibits the conjugation of the
probe and keeps it in the OFF state. The mechanochemical bond scission model was proposed in
Chapter 1 of this document as a mechanism for probe activation, and determined to fit all
experimental data gathered thus far. The model of thermally activated scission of the C-N bond

142
creating the ON state agrees with the experimental data of heat exposure-induced activation
presented in Chapter 2 section 5.1.4, as well as providing an explanation for the deformation-
induced activation of the probe. The increased stress on the bulk polymer is translated to an
increased stress on the C-N bond, which lowers the activation energy for scission of the bond to
a level where room temperatures provide enough energy to activate bond scission in a significant
fraction of the bonds and create a large ON state population.
2.1.1 Hypothesis and experiment
In the Zhurkov model, the exponential term (EA – ασ) is the most interesting aspect for this
study. The activation energy EA for scission of the C-N bond should be reduced by increasing
stresses in the bond. This should make scission of the bond more likely, and the OFFON
reaction should happen at a faster rate. A comparison of the OFFON reaction at similar
temperatures for samples with varying amounts of bond stress should show reaction rates that
increase as stress increases. A full Arrhenius activation energy measurement should show
decreasing activation energies for the OFFON reaction with increasing stresses.
A problem in this model is that the experimental methodology in this study does not
simultaneously apply stress and heat. The samples are deformed then heated, or heated then
deformed. This study assumes that the measured deformation εdef corresponds to an increase in
the bond stress in the C-N bond of AJNDE17, which is by no means assured. The discussion of
epoxy deformation in Chapter 1section 1.4 suggests that εdef results in shear defect formation and
intermolecular shear motion. The stretching of main-chain bonds is not thought to occur until
the strain hardening region at very high εdef, but AJNDE17 is bound to the network via side-
chain polymerization rather than main-chain, so intermolecular shear motion may affect the C-N
bond more strongly than other bonds.

143
2.2 Kinetic analysis methods
To evaluate the kinetics of the OFFON reaction, a measurement of the change in concentration
of the relative species, [OFF] and [ON], with respect to time is necessary. Accepted practices
which use the direct measurement of the OFF and ON species via NMR or FTIR are extremely
difficult in DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 systems because of the low probe concentrations used, the
general similarity of the OFF and ON states, and the overwhelming number of C-N bonds
involved in the DGEBA-DETA network. Another accepted technique is absorbance, applicable
when the species present have distinct absorbance spectra.
During cure, absorbance measurements can be used as a measure of [ON]. The absorbance peak
at 564nm was assigned to the activity of the probe molecule AJNDE17 based on the excitation
spectra (see Figure 61). Kinetics analysis was performed by using the value of the absorbance at
564nm, A564, as an indicator of [ON]. This technique is widely used to monitor the kinetics of
chemical reactions (96). The shape of the curve A564(t) should be a strong indicator of the
reaction order of the OFFON reaction.
The absorvance technique is impractical for solid samples because it relies on samples having the
same absorbance path length throughout testing– this is simple to assure using cuvettes for liquid
samples. But solid samples are deforming and relaxing during testing, making the path length
for which absorbance can occur shorter or longer. Attempts were made to adjust for this change
by normalizing to the new sample dimensions, but did not produce satisfactory data for use in
kinetic studies.
Measurements of fluorescence show a very strong and distinct spectral difference between the
OFF state and the ON state, suggesting that fluorescent emission may be used to monitor the
reaction. This technique has been applied by Carpick et.al. to evaluate the thermochromic

144
fluorescence of poly(diacetylene) (PDA) thin films, which transform between a non-fluorescent
blue state and a highly fluorescent red state when exposed to appropriate heating conditions (97).
In this work, the integral of the fluorescence curve associated with PDA’s red state was assumed
to be proportional to the concentration of the red state. This assumption is less appropriate for
DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 because of the overlap between epoxy emission and probe emission.
For this reason, the intensity of the peak emission of the probe, at ~630nm, will be assumed
proportional to the concentration of the ON state. The peak emission intensity of the ON state
still varies when the intensity of the entire spectrum changes as in sample realignment between
measurements or sample shape change, however, so we must normalize in some way to account
for whole-spectrum intensity changes. We can use an approach similar to the ratiometric probe
analysis techniques in discussed earlier (see Introduction section 2.2), and assume that the epoxy
and ON fluorescences are always proportional in the absence of an OFFON transition, to
normalize each spectrum and define a quantity I’
14
that is proportional to the concentration of the ON state
[ ] 15
With these assumptions, a measurement of [ON] can be taken from a single fluorescent
spectrum. For this approach to be valid, several assumptions must be made. These are presented
and discussed in the next section.

145
2.2.1 Assumptions required for kinetic analysis
The first assumption that is required for kinetic analysis of AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA is that
the fluorescent spectrum observed is due only to the epoxy, the OFF state of AJNDE17, or the
ON state of AJNDE17 – that is, no other fluorescent species are contributing to the emission.
We can further modify this assumption by observing from the excitation and emission data (see
Figure 62 that the OFF state is non-fluorescent so that the fluorescence observed comes only
from DGEBA-DETA or the ON state:
16
Some attributes of the OFFON reaction are assumed as well. The reaction is assumed to occur
in one step, with no byproducts, so that the total concentration of OFF and ON molecules is
constant. This is normalized to the initial concentration so that
[ ] [ ] 17
Where [OFF] is the relative concentration of OFF molecules and [ON] is the relative
concentration of ON molecules.
Another assumption about the OFFON reaction is that the back reaction ONOFF does not
occur quickly at room temperature. The results in section Chapter 2 section 3.3.5 show that the
back-reaction is possible over long time periods and in the presence of excess amine molecules,
but we assume that testing in this analysis is completed quickly enough after deformation or
heating that the back-reaction can be disregarded. Efforts were made to minimize the time
between heat exposure or deformation and subsequent spectra collection; the delay was on the
order of minutes in most cases.

146
The most important assumption requires that the ratio of epoxy fluorescence to ON state
fluorescence is unchanging if the OFFON reaction is not occurring:
⌋ [ ] 18
This assumption may not be perfectly valid for a number of reasons. The first reason is the
changes in shape of the epoxy due to deformation and heat-induced recovery of deformation.
The excitation LED source is not a perfect single-wavelength source, and some of the excitation
source is always reflected back to the detector even in perfect 45° alignment. Any overlap
between the excitation source bell curve distribution and the epoxy fluorescence will be
magnified when the sample is moved closer to the probe tip, as is the case when samples expand.
The opposite effect is expected when samples are deformed. The epoxy fluorescence signal will
therefore be increased when samples are expanding, and decreased when samples are
contracting. The overlap between excitation and fluorescence is relevant only for the epoxy
fluorescence, which occurs at wavelengths adjacent to the excitation.
Another reason why Eqn. 18 may not be valid is the effects quantified in Chapter 1 and
summarized in Table 4 – the changes in DGEBA-DETA fluorescence due to varying
environmental conditions. The fluorescence of DGEBA-DETA does not change significantly
with εdef. But it does increase with elevated temperature exposure, which is crucial to our
kinetics analysis procedure. The effect of elevated temperature on the DGEBA-DETA
fluorescence is a small increase in intensity at 505nm for samples with χ=1. This will cause I’
values to be smaller than a true measurement of [ON] would report.
Another problem with Eqn. 18 is that the fluorescence of DGEBA-DETA occurs at wavelengths
which overlap with the excitation spectrum of AJNDE17. If AJNDE17 absorbs any of the

147
fluorescence emission from DGEBA-DETA, the decrease in I505nm will cause I’ to be larger than
a true measurement of [ON] would report.
These assumptions must be considered when evaluating the validity of Eqn. 18. It is hoped that
the reduction in I’ due to increased DGEBA-DETA fluorescence due to elevated temperature
exposure, and the increase in I’ due to DGEBA-DETA fluorescence being absorbed by
AJNDE17’s ON state, will combine to leave I’ an adequate measure of [ON].
2.2.2 Order of reaction
No attempt has been made to study the kinetics of the OFFON reaction before this work, so
the order of the reaction is not known. Based on the proposed mechanism for the conversion
from OFF to ON, the reaction is most likely either 0th
or 1st
order. For a 0th
order reaction, the
change in concentration of a reactant [OFF] is independent of the concentration. Written in
terms of the concentration of the product [ON] in combination with Eqn. 17, this change is
expressed as
[ ] 19
Or, integrated,
[ ] 20
Where k is the reaction rate constant.
If the reaction is 1st
order, the change in concentration of the reactant [OFF] is proportional to the
remaining quantity of OFF molecules. Written in terms of the product [ON] in combination with
equation x, this is expressed as

148
[ ]
[ ] [ ]) 21
Or, integrated,
[ ] 22
Figure 84 shows a simplified plot of the behavior that the concentration of [ON] molecules
should exhibit over time if the reaction is of 0th
order or 1st
order. One of the major goals of this
work is to identify the order of reaction of the OFFON reaction in DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17.
2.2.3 Activation energy calculation
Using the models described in section 2.2, a reaction rate constant k can be extracted from plots
of I’ vs. time. The reaction rate constant varies with temperature according to the Arrhenius
reaction rate law
[ON]
Time
1st order
Oth order
Figure 84: simplified plot of [ON] vs. time theoretical behavior if
reaction is 0th order or 1st order.

149
23
Where k is the reaction rate, A is the pre-exponential factor, Ea is the reaction’s activation
energy, R is the gas constant and T the temperature. Gathering reaction rates at several
temperatures, an Arrhenius plot of ln k vs. (1/RT) can be constructed, the slope of which is the
activation energy of the reaction. Figure 85 has a sample Arrhenius plot.
3. KINETIC ANALYSIS MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
In this section the measurement techniques used to perform the kinetic analysis of DGEBA-
DETA-AJNDE17 will be presented. In Chapter 2, large OFFON reactions were observed
under 3 conditions – during cure, during elevated temperature exposure, and after uniaxial
compression. These three conditions can contribute to our understanding of the OFFON
reaction and provide data that can allow the kinetic analysis described in Chapter 3 section 2.2.
Ea
lnk
1/RT
Figure 85: Example Arrhenius plot.

150
3.1 Kinetic analysis during cure
Plastic cuvettes containing uncured DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 mixture were placed in the UV-
Vis absorbance beam path and allowed to cure. Absorbance spectra were collected at
appropriate time intervals (every 30 minutes for most mixtures) for the duration of the cure
process (24hr for most mixtures). Baseline absorbance was taken on an identical plastic cuvette
filled with unmixed DGEBA.
3.2 Kinetics of cured samples
The kinetics of cured samples were evaluated using combinations of elevated temperature and
mechanical deformation. It was not possible to develop an in-situ measurement technique for the
OFFON reaction during uniaxial compression, but the effects of εdef can be measured
indirectly by observing how εdef affects the OFFON response to heat.
3.2.1 Kinetics of heat exposure
Two methods of quantifiably measuring the OFFON reaction response of DGEBA-DETA-
AJNDE17 samples to elevated temperatures were used. The first is an incremental annealing
method, where samples were tested after successive cycles of exposure to heat in a water bath,
then quenching in ice water to return the sample rapidly to room temperature. Background
spectra were taken before each measurement to account for changes in signal intensity due to any
sample shape change. Water bath temperatures were 35, 40, 45, and 50°C. Annealing
increments were 15 seconds for each exposure except for 35°C measurements where the
exposures were in 30 second increments.
The second method is an in-situ heating method, where samples are placed on a digitally
controlled heated stage (part of a GladiATR FTIR fixture, Pike Technologies, Madison, WI)

151
while aligned with the spectrometer probe tip as in Figure 20. The stage was brought to the
exposure temperature, and a thin layer of heat transfer paste (Uniweld CoolBLUE) was used to
ensure good thermal contact between the sample and the stage. After quickly attaching the
sample to the stage using the heat transfer paste, spectra were collected continuously every 10
seconds beginning immediately after sample mounting. Temperatures were again 35, 40, 45, and
50ºC.
The two measurements are designed to measure the same phenomenon, the OFFON reaction
of the probe molecule in the solid epoxy at different temperatures. In the incremental method,
data collection is time consuming and difficult, samples must be re-aligned in the spectrometer
after heating, and error in sample exposure temperature and time are more of a factor. But the
ability to re-take background spectra between each spectra collection means that measurements
are corrected for any changes in spectra associated with shape change of the sample during heat
exposure. Spectra taken in the in-situ method are not corrected for sample shape change, and so
care must be taken in interpreting the spectral results to avoid times when large sample changes
are taking place due to recovery of εan.
3.3 Kinetics of heat-deformation combined exposure
In Chapter 2, fluorescence changes due to the OFFON reaction in DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17
were observed in samples in response to both heat and deformation. In order to explore the
interplay of these two effects, experiments combining temperature exposure and εdef were
designed. The temperature exposures were carried out via the methods described in Chapter 3
section Error! Reference source not found., with the same temperatures and exposure times.
our samples were deformed to the same εdef increment, approximately every .05 εdef up to .40,

152
and exposed to the four temperatures. Another set of four samples was loaded in the elastic
region of the stress-strain curve and unloaded, then tested for heat exposure changes.
4. KINETIC ANALYSIS OF MECHANOCHROMISM
This section presents the data gathered using the methods described in Chapter 3 section 3. The
kinetic analysis techniques discussed in Chapter 3 section 2.2 are applied, and the results are
presented.
4.1 Kinetics during cure
Figure 86 is a plot of the absorbance of AJNDE17 at 564nm, A564, as cure time increases in a RT
cure of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17. The red line shows the fitting curve developed from eqns. 21
and 22, the 1st
order reaction models. The fit is extremely accurate up to times ~1000min, with
R2
=.9977. After this time the absorbance values increase away from the first order prediction.
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
A564
Time (min)
A564nm
fit
Figure 86: Absorbance of AJDNE17 during DGEBA-DETA cure and fit line based on 1st order
model.

153
This result is strong evidence that before curing, AJNDE17’s OFFON reaction is of 1st
order.
The reaction deviates from 1st
order behavior after 1000min (16.6hr), which by comparison with
the α(t) plot in Figure 23 is well past the time when chain motion would be prevented by the
vitrification of DGEBA-DETA. The combined conclusion is that the OFFON reaction
displays 1st
order kinetics when intermolecular chain motion is not prevented.
4.2 Kinetics in solid polymer
The kinetics of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 were explored first as a function of heat alone, to
establish baseline levels of activity for the OFFON reaction. Both the water bath method and
the in-situ method were used. Results will first be presented for the water bath method, after
which the in-situ method’s results will be discussed.
4.2.1 Heat exposure via water bath
Figure 87 shows the raw emission spectra collected from a sample of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17
after several heat exposure-quench cycles. The spectra here are collected using the spectrometer
setup described in Chapter 1 section 2.2.3.3, and the water bath heat exposure method described
in Chapter 3 section 3.2.1.

154
The spectra show that the emission peak at 505nm gradually decreases as heat exposure
increases, while the emission peak at 630nm dramatically increases. This is consistent with the
theory proposed in Chapter 2 section 3.3.1 where emission from DGEBA-DETA excites
AJNDE17 emission. This behavior was typical of all temperatures tested and all methods used,
whether in-situ heating or water bath heat-quench cycles were the source of heat.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
Intensity(raw)
Wavelength (nm)
as cast
15 sec
30 sec
45 sec
60 sec
75 sec
90 sec
Figure 87: Emission spectra of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 after successive heat exposures
in 45C water bath. Arrows indicate spectral intensity changes with increasing heat
exposure.

155
Figure 88 shows a plot of I’(t) for the four temperatures used, collected from the water bath-
quench method. It is clear that increasing temperature exposures cause an increase in both the
magnitude of the maximum value of I’(t), I’max, and the rate of change . These observations
are consistent with Arrhenius type reactions. Samples below 40°C (~Tg - 20°C) show little
activation.
4.2.2 Heat exposure after strain – water bath method
Figure 89 shows the change in I’ with time for samples initially strained to various εdef and
subsequently heated at 50°C via water bath method. Note the initial change in I’ with no elapsed
time due to strain.
0.4
0.9
1.4
1.9
2.4
2.9
0 100 200 300 400 500
I'
Time (sec)
55C
50C
45C
40C
35C
Figure 88: I' vs time for DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 samples experiencing different
heat exposure temperatures.

156
The rate of change in I’ appears generally to increase as εdef increases. There also appears to be
a change in the shape of the curve, from a linear increase with time for low εdef to a curve that
appears exponential at high εdef. It is possible that is exponential for all εdef, but with such low
exponential terms that the behavior appears linear.
4.2.3 Water bath method – kinetic analysis
The representative data shown in Figure 89 for 50ºC exposure in the water bath method, when
compared with the theoretical data for 0th
order and 1st
order reaction, does not allow a strong
conclusion to be reached about the OFFON reaction order. The reaction appears to be linear at
low εdef, suggesting 0th
order, but exponential at high εdef, suggesting 1st
order. For this reason,
data was analyzed considering the reaction as both 0th
order and 1st
order.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 50 100 150 200
I'
Time (sec)
unstrained
.04 strain
.09 strain
.42 strain
strain-induced
Figure 89: I' vs time for 50°C heat exposures of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 after varying εdef, listed in
legend. Note strain induced change at t=0.

157
A representative data set showing the models’ respective fitting curves for a sample of DGEBA-
DETA-AJNDE17 having εdef=.12 is shown in Figure 90. As expected, the 0th
order fitting is not
appropriate for samples of high εdef, but the analysis was carried out for comparison.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 50 100 150 200
I'
Time (sec)
.12 strain
.12 0th order
.12 1st order
Figure 90: comparison of models for sample of εdef =.12 heated at 50ºC with water
bath method.
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
1.58 1.6 1.62 1.64 1.66 1.68 1.7 1.72
lnk
1/RT
unstrained 0.029
0.084 0.129
0.174 0.235
0.288 0.336
0.394 0.42
Figure 91: Arrhenius plot for 0th order fit of OFF-->ON reaction data
collected using water bath method.

158
The Arrhenius activation energy calculations were carried out using the reaction rate constants
calculated for 0th
order and 1st
order fits of I’(t) curves, using the procedure described in Chapter
3 section 2.2.3. The Arrhenius plot of the 0th
order fit is displayed in Figure 91. The lines of
best fit drawn through the four data points represent the activation energy of the OFFON
reaction at the εdef of the samples, listed in the legend.
Plots of Ea measured for varying levels of εdef are displayed in Figure 92a for 0th
order and Figure
92b for 1st
order. The error bars in the x-direction represent the standard deviation of the εdef of
the four samples used to calculate Ea. the error bars in the y-direction are a measure of the
coefficient of linearity of the best fit line through the four values in the Arrhenius plot (see
Figure 91). The activation energy results show a significant decrease in magnitude as εdef
increases from 0 to ~.15, after which Ea remains nearly constant until after εdef~.30. The reaction
order models differ in their evaluation of activation energy change at high εdef – the 0th
order
model has Ea remaining essentially constant at the decreased values, while the 1st
order model
has Ea rising to pre-deformation values and above after εdef ~.30.
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Ea(kcal/mol)
Deformation Strain
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Ea(kcal/mol)
Deformation Strain
a) b)
Figure 92: Activation energies for OFF-->ON reaction calculated using a) 0th order and b) 1st order kinetics
models.

159
The results differ in magnitude as well (Ea = 61.9 kcal/mol for 0th
order, unstrained vs 17.3
kcal/mol for 1st
order, unstrained). The 1st
order result is more closely matched to literature
values for thermally activated fluorescence reactions in literature (97).
4.2.4 Kinetics of heat exposure – in-situ method
Figure 93 shows representative data gathered from the in-situ method at 50°C for samples of
various εdef. This plot has been corrected to allow for comparison between unstrained and
strained samples by offsetting the curves to begin at (t=0, I’=0). It is clear from this data that
samples with higher strains show an elevated reaction rate compared to unstrained samples, and
that 1st
order kinetics is a more appropriate model for evaluating the reaction kinetics.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0 100 200 300 400 500
I'
Time (sec)
unstrained
elastic
.15 strain
.2 strain
.300 strain
.35 strain
Figure 93: I' vs time data for samples heated at 50C after varying εdef, collected by in situ heating
method.

160
Figure 94 shows the results of Ea calculations for the OFFON reaction based on 1st
order
kinetics fitting of the I’(t) curves collected from DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17 samples using the
in-situ method.
The results agree generally with data collected from the water bath method – Ea decreases with
increasing εdef until approx. εdef=.15, after which it remains nearly constant for increasing εdef.
The magnitude of Ea calculated with this method also agree well with the 1st
order kinetics
measurements done via water bath, and with literature values for thermally activated reactions
measured by fluorescence (97).
5. DISCUSSION OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
In this section, the results gathered from kinetic studies of the OFFON reaction of DGEBA-
DETA-AJNDE17 during cure and during exposure to heat will be discussed.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Ea
Deformation Strain
Figure 94: Activation energy of OFF-->ON reaction for varying deformation trains -
1st order fit of in-situ heating method

161
5.1 Kinetics during cure
The results in Figure 86 strongly support the conclustion that the OFFON reaction of
AJNDE17 during cure of DGEBA-DETA obeys 1st
order kinetics. This kinetic model predicts
the slowing of the reaction as time increases. However, it cannot fully explain the variation in
magnitude of A564 at the end of cure with χ (see Figure 78). One possible explanation may lie in
the changing rate of cure . As χ increases, increases, so the sample reaches the gelation
point more quickly. The OFFON reaction would not progress as far if the 1st
order reaction
was limited to activity below the gel point.
5.2 Kinetics in solid DGEBA-DETA
A comparison of the change in Ea with the quantities ΔUdef, εan and εpl can help identify the most
important aspects of the epoxy molecular environment that influence the OFFON reaction of
AJNDE17. The data from the in-situ heat/strain testing method will be compared in detail with
these quantities, and the other kinetic methods’ results will be compared with these results.

162
Figure 95a shows the quantity ΔUdef for amine-cured epoxy for increasing εdef (curve 1, ref. (36))
side-by-side with Figure 95b, the values of εan and εpl for increasing εdef (38). Figure 95c shows
the change in Ea measured by the in-situ heating method with 1st
order fit, while Figure 95d
shows the change in R with increasing εdef.
The ΔUdef curve for epoxy shows little or no increase until ~εdef ~.10, after which a strong rise is
observed followed by a slower rise or plateau-type region above εdef ~.25. The measured change
in Ea for the OFFON reaction of AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA approximately mirrors this
trend. Based strictly on the on the magnitudes of energy involved that the ΔUdef cannot be
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Ea(kcal/mol)
Deformation Strain
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
R
Deformation Strain
Figure 95: comparison of stored internal energy of epoxy with reduction in activation energy for OFF--
>ON reaction of DGEBA-DETA-AJNDE17. A) curve 1 b) in situ heating method. Figures from (36)
and (38).
a)
d)
b)
c)

163
directly responsible for the reduction in Ea of the reaction – the highest measured ΔUdef is only
.00121 kcal/mol of DGEBA, far below the ~12 kcal/mol change recorded in this study.
However, it is the molecular changes associated with the increase in ΔUdef that are interesting.
Comparing Figure 95b with Figure 95c shows a similar correlation between the change in Ea and
the change in εan, with increasing values at lower εdef and a plateau region above εdef~.25. There
is ambiguity in the measured Ea data about where the onset of Ea reduction begins, but the plateau
region is clear.
The increase-plateau behavior in ΔUdef and εan with respect to εdef has been associated with the
nucleation and growth of shear defects and intermolecular shear motion. The activation energy
decrease for heat-induced activation of the OFFON reaction of AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA
also shows increase-plateau behavior with respect to εdef, which is suggests an important
correlation between shear defects and intermolecular shear motion and the OFFON reaction.
Figure 95d shows the activation of the OFFON reaction induced only by mechanical
deformation, plotted against εdef. When compared with Figure 95a and b, this behavior correlates
more closely with the behavior of εpl than with εan and ΔUdef – it grows slowly before εdef ~ .15,
then more rapidly for higher values of εdef.
5.3 Comparison with Zhurkov model
The Zhurkov model’s modified Arrhenius equation (Eqn. 13) predicts a reduction in Ea for the
breaking of a bond as the stress on the bond σ is increased. The OFFON reaction of
AJNDE17 involves the breaking of the C-N bond that attaches AJNDE17 to the DGEBA-DETA
network, so the model has some physical relevance. The relevant results gathered in Chapter 2
and Chapter 3 will be discussed here in relation to the Zhurkov model.

164
5.3.1 Kinetics during cure and stoichometric dependence
The observed OFFON reaction kinetics of AJNDE17 during cure, and the dependence of the
reaction progress on χ, suggest that the molecule AJNDE17 is being turned ON during the period
before gelation. The source of the stress on the C-N bond during this period is difficult to
quantify, but may come from competing reactions for the amine from epoxide groups, or from
intermolecular shear mixing motions that are possible while DGEBA-DETA is still a liquid. In
any case, if the reaction is allowed to proceed during the time before gelation, the OFFON
reaction’s varying progress with respect to χ can be explained by the increased rate of cure
lowering the time allowed for the reaction.
5.3.2 Mechanical deformation and hydrostatic stress
The C-N bond cannot be part of the DGEBA-DETA network, since it has only one reactive site,
and so AJNDE17 must be a side-chain addition to the network. A main-chain bond would begin
to be stressed only during strain hardening after chains begin to align and stretch (see Chapter 1
section 1.4.5). But a side chain bond would more logically be stressed during intermolecular
shear motion.
The activation of the OFFON reaction due to εdef, measured by the variable R and plotted in
Figure 76, shows a two-step increase – a slow region below εdef ~.15, and a more rapid region
above εdef ~.15. The correlation between the change in R with εdef and the plateau in εan should
be noted. Below this plateau, the nucleation and growth of shear defects and the intermolecular
shear motion associated with their appearance is low but increasing, just as the slope of R is
increasing. At this plateau intermolecular shear motion reaches its maximum, so the stress on
the C-N bond should reach its maximum as well. The value of R continues to increase beyond

165
this plateau, constantly and at its fastest rate. The time spent under load in uniaxial compression
increases during this time, allowing the OFFON reaction to continue to progress while
intermolecular motion is allowed, leading to increased R values.
Hydrostatic pressure causes no εdef, therefore no intermolecular shear motion is produced and no
stress on the proposed C-N side chain bond is produced. The OFFON reaction does not occur
at room temperature, therefore, because the energy barrier is prohibitive.
5.3.3 Activation energy
A side chain bond would more logically be stressed during intermolecular shear motions such as
those associated with εan and ∆Udef. These properties show a plateau around εdef~.15, just as the
decrease in Ea plateaus. This result is consistent with the Zhurkov model.
5.4 Summary
If the assumption is made that the side-chain bond attaching AJNDE17 to DGEBA-DETA is
stressed predominantly during intermolecular shear motion, the data observed during cure,
during heat exposures, and after εdef strongly supports the Zhurkov model. This work does not
evaluate the fitness of that assumption, but it is logical based on the molecular structure and
design of AJNDE17 in DGEBA-DETA.

166
CONCLUSIONS
 Fluorescent probe molecules AJNDE15 and AJNDE17 were characterized in DGEBA-
DETA, and found to be mechanochromic.
 Techniques similar to those used in ratiometric fluorescent sensors were applied to
evaluate the mechanochromic response, using the ratio of DGEBA-DETA fluorescent
emission to probe molecule emission. The response of the probes was found to be
monotonic and one-to-one with the deformation strain εdef.
 The mechanism by which the probe molecules display mechanochromism was evaluated
by comparison with mechanochromic mechanisms reported in the literature. A
mechanochemical reaction which interrupts the conjugation of the probe molecules was
consistent with observed probe responses during cure, and responses after cure to
uniaxial compression, hydrostatic pressure, elevated temperature exposure, and variation
in stoichiometry.
 The kinetic behavior of AJNDE17’s OFF reaction was investigated. The probe was
determined to turn ON via 1st
order kinetics under conditions where intermolecular shear
motion occurs, such as during cure; during uniaxial compressive deformation beyond the
yield point; and at temperatures within 20°C of Tg.
 The activation energy of AJNDE17’s activation reaction was compared with the amount
of deformation strain using 3 methods of combined heat-strain testing. The activation
energy decreases then plateaus in a manner consistent with the nucleation, growth, and
motion of shear defects and intermolecular shear motion.

167
 If the side-chain bond attaching AJNDE17 to the DGEBA-DETA network is assumed to
be stressed by intermolecular shear motion but not by hydrostatic pressure or main-chain
alignment, the Zhurkov model is consistent with the observations made in this study.

168
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This project was funded by the Boeing Company’s University Research Program, under project
#BL8DL (Witness Surface Coatings Project).
The author would like to thank PhD Advisor and project Principal Investigator Dr. Brian Flinn;
project co-Principal Investigator Dr. Alex Jen, project co-workers Dr. Sei-Hum Jang, Dr.
Zhengwei Shi, Tucker Howie; project contributors Aaron Capps, Natalie Larson, Nathan
Lowman, A.J. Singh, Jeffrey Yang; Flinn Group co-workers especially Gary Weber, Ashley
Tracey, Curtis Hickmott, Dana Rosenbladt; Jen Group co-workers Dr. Cody Youngbull; PhD
Committee members Dr. Christine Luscombe, Dr. Santosh Devasia, Dr. Gary Georgeson.
The author would like to thank personally his family and friends for their continued support and
patience.

169
WORKS CITED
1. Liber, T., Daniel, I.M., Schraum, S.W. ASTM STP 696 - Ultrasonic Techniques for
Inspecting Flat and Cylindrical Composite Parts. Conshocken, PA : ASTM International, 1979.
2. Cantwell, W.J., Curtis, P.T., Morton, J. 1986, Comp. Sci. & Tech., Vol. 25, pp. 133-48.
3. Kumar, P., Rai, B. 1993, Comp. Struct., Vol. 23, pp. 313-18.
4. Morton, J., Godwin, E.W. 1989, Comp. Struct., Vol. 13, pp. 1-19.
5. Messner, D. Presentation at ASM Non Destructive Testing Tutorial. Seattle, WA : s.n., 2004.
6. Henneke, E. Non Destructive Testing of Fiber Reinforced Plastics Composites. [ed.] J.
Summerscales. New York : Elsevier Applied Science, 1990. Vol. II.
7. Stone, D.E.W, Clarke, B. 1975, Non-Destr. Test., Vol. 8, pp. 137-145.
8. Dean, G.D., Lockett, F.J. ASTM STP 521: High Modulus Fibers and Composites.
Conshocken : ASTM International, 1973. pp. 326-46.
9. Prakash, R. October 1980, Composites, pp. 217-224.
10. Scott, I.G., Scala, C.M. April 1982, NDT Int'l, pp. 75-85.
11. Durr, Heinz and Bouas-Laurent, Henri, [ed.]. Photochromism: Molecules and Systems.
New York : Elsevier, 1990. pp. 15-25.
12. Victoria, University of. epi-fluorescence techniques. [Online]
http://web.uvic.ca/ail/techniques/epi-fluorescence.html.

170
13. Valeur, B and Berberan-Santos, M. Molecular Fluorescence - Principles and Applications.
New York : Wiley-VCH, 2002.
14. Van Keuren, E., Littlejohn, D. and Schrof, W. 2004, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., Vol. 37, pp.
2938-43.
15. Drickamer, H G and et al. 2001, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 40, pp. 3038-41.
16. Woo, H Y and et al. 2005, J. Am. Chem. Soc. , Vol. 127, pp. 14721-14729.
17. Itakagi, H, Horie, K and Mita, I. 1990, Prog. Polym. Sci., Vol. 15, pp. 361-424.
18. Hu, J and Liu, S. 2010, Macromolecules, Vol. 43, pp. 8315-30.
19. Grynkiewicz, G, Peonie, M and Tsien, R Y. 6, 1985, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol.
260, p. 3440.
20. Life Technologies. Indo-1 Calcium Indicator. www.invitrogen.com. [Online] [Cited: 3 6,
2013.] http://www.invitrogen.com/site/us/en/home/Products-and-Services/Applications/Drug-
Discovery/Target-and-Lead-Identification-and-Validation/g-protein_coupled_html/cell-based-
second-messenger-assays/indo-1-calcium-indicator.html.
21. Charier, Sandrine, et al., et al. 2004, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 43,
pp. 4785-4788.
22. Zhu, Houjuan, et al., et al. 2012, Nanotechnology, Vol. 23, p. 315502.
23. Kostov, Yordan, et al., et al. 6, 2000, Applied Spectroscopy, Vol. 54, p. 864.

171
24. Bamfield, Peter and Hutchings, Michael G. Chromic Phenomena: The technological
applications of colour chemistry. Cambridge, UK : Royal Society of Chemistry, 2010. pp. 104-5.
25. Beckham, H W and Rubner, Michael F. 5, 1989, Macromolecules, Vol. 22, p. 2130.
26. Yoshino, Katsumi, Sawada, Keiji and Onoda, Mitsuyoshi. 1989, Japanese Journal of
Applied Physics, Vol. 28, p. L1029.
27. Crist, B. Yield Processes in Glassy Polymers - Ch. 4. [ed.] R N Haward and R J Young. The
Physics of Glassy Polymers. 2nd. New York : Chapman & Hall, 1997.
28. Yamini, S and Young, R J. 1980, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 15, pp. 1814-22.
29. Oleinik, E F. 1986, Advances in Polymer Science, Vol. 80, pp. 49-99.
30. Haward, R N and Young, R J. Introduction - Chapter 1. The Physics of Glassy Polymers.
2nd. New York : Chapman & Hall, 1997, pp. 1-30.
31. Rackley, F A, et al., et al. 1974, Journal of Polymer Science, Polymer Physics Edition, Vol.
12, p. 1355.
32. Berger, Larry L and Kramer, Edward J. 1988, Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 23, pp.
3536-3543.
33. Donald, A M. Crazing, Ch. 6. [ed.] R N Haward and R J Young. The Physics of Glassy
Polymers. 2nd. New York : Chapman & Hall, 1997, p. 296.
34. Oleinik, E F, Rudnev, S N and Salamatina, O B. 12, 2007, Polymer Science A, Vol. 49,
pp. 1302-1327.

172
35. Kargin, V A and Slonimskii, G L. Short Essays on Physical Chemistry of Polymers.
Moscow : Khimiya, 1967.
36. Oleynik, E. 1989, Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science, Vol. 80, pp. 140-150.
37. Callister, William D. Materials Science and Engineering - An Introduction. 6th. New York :
John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
38. Quinson, R, et al., et al. 1996, Journal of Materials Science , Vol. 31, pp. 4387-4394.
39. Boyce, M C and Haward, R N. The post-yield deformation of glassy polymers - Ch. 5. [ed.]
R N Haward and R J Young . The Physics of Glassy Polymers. New York : Chapman & Hall,
1997, p. 213.
40. Treloar, L R. The Physics of Rubber Plasticity. 3rd. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1975.
41. Arruda, E M and Boyce, M C. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, Vol. 41, p. 389.
42. Arruda, E M and Boyce, M C. International Journal of Plasticity, Vol. 9, p. 697.
43. Lohse, F, et al., et al. 1969, British Polymer Journal, Vol. 1, pp. 110-14.
44. Prime, R B. Characterization of Thermoset Resins. [ed.] Edith A Turi. Thermal
Characterization of Polymeric Materials. San Diego : Academic Press, 1997.
45. Ye, Q, et al., et al. 2, 2007, Journal of Biomedical Research, Vol. 80, pp. 440-6.
46. Vatanprast, R and Lemmetyinen, H. 2000, Polymer, Vol. 41, pp. 5571-6.
47. George, G A, Cash, G A and Rintroul, L. 1996, Polymer International, Vol. 41, pp. 169-
182.

173
48. International, ASTM. ASTM E1640. West Conshocken, PA : ASTM International , 1997.
49. Birks, J B. 1975, Rep. Prog. Phys. , Vol. 38, pp. 903-974.
50. Zlatkevich, Lev, [ed.]. Luminescence Techniques in Solid State Polymer Research. New
York : Marcel Dekker, 1989.
51. Barltrop, J A and Coyle, J D. Principles of Photochemistry. London : John Wiley and Sons,
1978.
52. Yang, J, et al., et al. 2000, J. Appl. Polym Sci., Vol. 82, pp. 2347-2351.
53. Crenshaw, B R and Weder, C. 2003, Chem Mater, Vol. 15, pp. 4717-4724.
54. Lowe, C and Weder, C. 22, 2002, Adv. Mater., Vol. 14, p. 1625.
55. Strehmel, B, Strehmel, V and Younes, M. 13, 1999, J. Polym. Sci. B, Vol. 37, pp. 1367-86.
56. Treloar, L R. G. The Physics of Rubber Elasticity. New York : Oxford University Press,
1975.
57. Godovsky, Yuli K. Thermophysical Properties of Polymers. New York : Springer-Verlag,
1992.
58. Nielsen, L E and Landel, R F. Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites. 2nd.
New York : Marcel Dekker, Inc, 1994.
59. Polymer. Wang, Francis W, Lowry, Robert E and Fanconi, Bruno M. 1986, Vol. 27, pp.
1529-32.
60. —. Goyanes, S, et al., et al. 2005, Vol. 46, pp. 9081-7.

174
61. —. Goyanes, S, et al., et al. 2003, Vol. 44, pp. 3193-9.
62. Deng, Q and Jean, W C. 1993, Macromolecules, Vol. 26, pp. 30-34.
63. Chemical Reviews. Beyer, Martin K and Clausen-Schaumann, Hauke. 8, 2005, Vol. 105,
pp. 2921-44.
64. Benachour, Djafer and Rogers, C E. Strain-Enhanced Photodegradataion of Polyethylene.
[ed.] S Peter Pappas and F H Winslow. Photodegradation and Photostabilizaton of Coatings:
ACS Symposium Series 151. s.l. : American Chemical Society, 1981, pp. 263-274.
65. Journal of Macromolecular Science C: Polymer Reviews. Tyler, David R. 4, 2004, Vol. 44,
pp. 351-388.
66. Davis, D A. 2009, Nature, Vol. 459, pp. 68-72.
67. Journal of Polymer Science B: Polymer Physics. Zhurkov, S N and Korsukov, V E. 2,
1974, Vol. 12, pp. 385-98.
68. Physics of the Solid State. Butyagin, P Yu and Streletskii, A N. 5, 2005, Vol. 47, pp. 830-
836.
69. Treatment of Dispersed Materials and Media. Borunova, A B, Zhernovenkova, Yu V and
Streletskii, A N. Odessa : s.n., 1999, Vol. 9, p. 158.
70. Journal of Materials Chemistry. Song, Young-Soo, et al., et al. 2012, Vol. 22, pp. 1380-
1386.
71. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. Cho, Sung-Youl, Kim, Joong-Gon and Chung, Chan-
Moon. Vol. 134, pp. 822-25.

175
72. Smith, M B and March, J. March's Advanced Organic Chemistry, Reactions, Mechanisms,
and Structures. 5th. New York : John Wiley and Sons, 2001.
73. Journal of the American Chemical Society. Cremer, J and Gauss, J. 1986, Vol. 108, pp.
7467-7477.
74. Brown, Theodore L, LeMay, H Eugene and Bursten, Bruce E. Chemistry: The Central
Science. 8th. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, 2000.
75. Polymer. Lin, King-Fu and Wang, Francis W. 4, 1994, Vol. 35, pp. 687-91.
76. Accounts of Chemical Research. Lewis, Frederick D. 4, 1979, Vol. 12, pp. 152-8.
77. Journal of Chemical Physics. Masuhara, H, Hino, T and Mataga, N. 1975, Vol. 79, p. 994.
78. Polymer Engineering Science. Nass, K A and Seferis, J C. 5, 1989, Vol. 29, p. 315.
79. Bulletins of the Korean Chemical Society. Kim, Hongkyeong and Char, Kookheon. 11,
1999, Vol. 20, p. 1329.
80. Chemical Materials. Kinami, Maki, Crenshaw, Brent R and Weder, Christoph. Vol. 18,
pp. 946-955.
81. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. Kunzelmann, Jill, et al., et al. Vol. 227, pp. 1981-
7.
82. Law, K Y and Loutfy, R O. 1981, Macromolecules, Vol. 14, p. 587.
83. Journal de Physique IV. Wang, S J, Wang, C L and Wang, B. Colloque C4, 1993, Vol. 3,
pp. 275-9.

176
84. Journal of Polymer Science B: Polymer Physics. Hasan, O A, et al., et al. 1993, Vol. 31, pp.
198-197.
85. —. Xie, L, et al., et al. 1995, Vol. 33, pp. 77-84.
86. Polymer. Gupta, V B and Brahatheeswaran, C. 10, 1991, Vol. 32, pp. 1875-84.
87. Venditti, R A, et al., et al. 1995, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., Vol. 56, pp. 1207-20.
88. Deng, Q, Zandiehnadem, F and Jean, W C. 1992, Macromolecules, Vol. 25, pp. 1090-
1095.
89. Journal of Physical Chemistry A. Wojtyk, J T C, et al., et al. 39, 2000, Vol. 104, pp. 9046-
55.
90. —. Chibisov, A K and Gorner, H. 24, 1997, Vol. 101, pp. 4305-4312.
91. Pure and Applied Chemistry. Wetzler, Diana E, et al., et al. 3, 2001, Vol. 73, pp. 405-9.
92. Physics of the Solid State Editorial Board. 5, 2005, Physics of the Solid State, Vol. 47, pp.
771-6.
93. Beyer, Martin K and Clausen-Schaumann, Hauke. 8, 2005, Chemical Reviews, Vol. 105,
p. 2921.
94. Tyler, David R. 4, 2004, Journal of Macromolecular Science Part C - Polymer Reviews,
Vol. 44, p. 351.
95. Zhurkov, S N and Korsukov, V E. 2, 1974, Journal of Polymer Science - Polymer Physics
Edition, Vol. 12, p. 385.

177
96. Treinin, A and Hayon, E. 20, 1970, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 92, p.
5821.
97. Carpick, R W, et al., et al. 2000, Langmuir, Vol. 16, pp. 4639-4647.
98. Schultz, J M. Polymer Materials Science. s.l. : Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1974. pp. 500-1.
99. Treloar, L R. The Physics of Rubber Plasticity. 3rd. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1975.
100. Poon, C. et. al. 1990, Theor. & Appl. Fract. Mech., Vol. 13, pp. 81-97.
101. Wu, W-C. et.al. 2010, Adv. Funct. Mater., Vol. 20, pp. 1413-23.
102. Luo, J. 2001, Chem. Commun., pp. 1740-1.
103. Bokobza, L. 1981, Polymer, Vol. 22, pp. 1309-1311.
104. Younes, M, Wartewig, S and Lelliger, D. 1994, Polymer, Vol. 35, pp. 5269-78.
105. Rettig, W, Fritz, W and Springer, J. Photochemical Processes in Organized Molecular
Systems. [ed.] K Honda. Amsterdam : Elsevier Science, 1991. p. 61.
106. Strehmel, B, et al., et al. 1992, Eur. Polym. J., Vol. 25, p. 325.
107. Royal, J S, Victor, J G and Torkelson, J M. 1992, Macromolecules, Vol. 25, pp. 729-34.
108. Royal, J S and Torkelson, J M. 1992, Macromolecules, Vol. 25, pp. 4792-4796.
109. Loutfy, R O and Arnold, B A. 1982, J. Phys. Chem., Vol. 86, pp. 4205-4211.
110. Technologies, Agilent. Basics of Measuring the Dielectric Properties of Materials. s.l. :
Agilent Technologies, 2006.

178
111. Journal of Physical Chemistry. Abdel-Halim, Shakir T, Abdel-Kader, Mahmoud H and
Steiner, Ulrich E. 1988, Vol. 15, pp. 4324-8.

Ryan E Toivola dissertation

More Related Content

Similar to Ryan E Toivola dissertation (20)

Ryan E Toivola dissertation