Sample manuscript (1) http://www.cheapassignmenthelp.com/

SAMPLE MANUSCRIPT
in APA format (5th
ed.)
According to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th
ed.), the
pages of a manuscript should be arranged as follows:
A. Title Page – page 1 [See Sections 1.06, 5.15]
B. Abstract – page 2 [See Sections 1.07, 5.16]
C. Text – begin on page 3 [See Section 5.17]
1. Introduction [See Section 1.08]
2. Method [See Section 1.09]
a. Participants
b. Apparatus (or Materials)
c. Procedure
3. Results [See Section 1.10]
4. Discussion [See Section 1.11]
D. References – start on separate page
[See Sections 1.13, 3.94-3.103, Ch. 4]
E. Appendices – start each on separate page
[See Sections 1.14, 3.90-3.93, 5.19]
F. Author note – start on separate page
[See sections 1.15, 3.89, 5.20]
G. Footnotes – list together, starting on separate page
[See Sections 3.87, 5.20]
H. Tables – start each on separate page
[See Sections 3.62-3.74, 5.21]
I. Figure Captions – list together, starting on separate page
[See Sections 3.84, 5.22]
J. Figures – place each on separate page
[See sections 3.75-3.86, 5.22]

The first page of every manuscript is the title page (see pp. 10-12 of the APA Publication Manual). The title page is
removed if the author does not want reviewers to know who wrote the article: a “blind” review.
Typing Instructions
• Double space the entire manuscript.
• Use 1 inch (2.54 cm) margins on all four sides.
Effects of Defendant 1
Running head: SENTENCE LENGTH INFLUENCED BY JURY DISCUSSION
Effects of Defendant Attractiveness
and Jury Discussion on Length of Sentence
Susan B. Crosby
State University of New York College at Oswego
Title Page
Page headers
Purpose: To identify manuscript without
author’s name.
• Appears on every page.
• First two or three words of title.
Page number
• The title page is 1.
• Only the number is written.
Running head
Purpose: To provide an abbreviated
version of the title. It appears on the top of the
right-hand journal pages to remind the reader
which article they are reading.
• Include the words “Running Head”
followed by a colon.
• Maximum 50 letters, spaces, and
punctuation, excluding the words
“Running head”.
• Avoid use of commas.
• Use all capital letters.
• Place near the top of the page.
• Flush left.
Title
Purpose: To review the main idea of the paper.
• Give names of independent and dependent
variables.
• 10-12 words.
• First letter of each main word is
capitalized.
• Center each line of the title.
Author’s name
• Use your name.
• Center.
Author’s affiliation
• Give the name of your school.
• Center.

NEW PAGE – The second page of every manuscript contains the abstract (see pp. 12-15 of the APA Publication Manual).
• Make sure the reader knows “WHAT YOU DID” and “WHAT YOU GOT.”
• Empirical study: 100-120 words
• Review/theoretical article: 75-100 words NEW PAGE – The introduction is begun on the third page of every manuscript
(see pp. 11-12 of the APA Publication Manual).
Abstract
Ten groups of six participant-jurors each viewed a videotape of a trial in
which either an attractive or unattractive female defendant was convicted
of vehicular manslaughter. Before any group discussion about the case,
each participant-juror recommended a sentence for the defendant (from 1
to 25 years). After group discussion, each participant-juror again
recommended a sentence. Prior to group discussion, the unattractive
defendant received a longer sentence than the attractive defendant, but
after group discussion, attractive and unattractive defendants were sentenced
equally. These results support problem-solving theory, but contradicted
information-integration theory.
Abstract
• The abstract is always the second page.
• Center the word “Abstract”.
• Only the first letter is capitalized.
• Do NOT italicize or underline the word
“Abstract”.
• Do NOT indent first word of the
abstract.
• Use one paragraph only.
• No more than 120 words.
Purpose:
1. Review problem under
investigation with a single sentence
(may be omitted if abstract is long).
2. Review methodology (participants,
apparatus/materials, procedures).
3. Review results, conclusions, and
implications.
4. Write concisely.

NEW PAGE – The introduction is begun on the third page of every manuscript (see pp. 15-17 of the APA Publication Manual).
Effects of Defendant Attractiveness
and Jury Discussion on Length of Sentence
Forensic Psychology deals with the application of psychology to legal
issues and court cases (Deitz, 2000). One area in forensic psychology is the
investigation of factors other than the evidence and testimony presented
during a trial that can influence jury decisions. These “extra legal” factors
include the defendant’s race, gender, and socioeconomic status (Saks &
Hastie, 1978). Another one of these factors is the attractiveness of the
defendant: more attractive defendants generally receive more lenient
sentence recommendations. Landy and Aronson (1969) had subject-jurors
read a case of an alcohol-related driving accident prior to their recommending
a sentence length for the defendant (from 1 to 25 years). The attractive
defendant was presented as an insurance assessor with a stable employment
record. He was known as a good worker with no criminal record and was a
widower intending to spend Christmas Eve with his daughter and son-in-law.
The unattractive defendant was a recently hired janitor with a criminal record.
He was not known by his fellow employees, he was a divorcee with three
children, and he intended to spend Christmas Eve with his girlfriend. Even
though the same evidence was presented to convict both defendants, the
subject-jurors recommended a shorter sentence for the more attractive
defendant.
Introduction
• Repeat the title.
• Center the title.
• Do NOT repeat the author’s name or
affiliation.
• The introduction is NOT labeled.
• Indent the first word of every
paragraph ½”.
Purpose 1:
Introduction of the problem
• Begin by identifying the research
issue.
Purpose 2:
Development of the background
• Review the pertinent literature
• For each article you review, be sure that the
reader knows:
1. What variables were manipulated
2. What variables were measured.
3. The results and conclusions.
• The review should be concise, but
sometime it is necessary to give a
more complete review (the sample
provided gives a fair amount of
detail).
• Use the author-date method of
citation (author’s or authors’ last
name(s) and date of publication for
citation).
• There is no need to repeat the year if you are
referring to the same
publication in the same paragraph.

In another study of an auto-accident case, jurors recommended a shorter
sentence for the more attractive defendant than for the less attractive one
(Kaplan & Kemerick, 1974). Moreover, in studies in which attractiveness
is defined in terms of physical characteristics alone, results have been
similar. For example, Efran (1974) attached a photograph of a physically
attractive or unattractive male or female college student to a booklet
describing a case of student cheating. Participant-juror ratings of the
defendant on a 6-point scale indicated a desire to punish the unattractive
defendant more severely than the attractive defendant.
Gerbasi, Zuckerman, and Hess (1977) pointed out that these, as well as
other participant-juror studies (e.g., Nemeth & Sosis, 1973; Sigall & Ostrove,
1975), are lacking in one critical respect: participant-jurors were presented
with a case and were asked to render sentence without discussing the case
with fellow jurors, which is always the case following a real trial. The purpose
of the present experiment was to determine if attractiveness of the defendant
influences the length of sentence recommendations when group discussion
precedes a sentencing decision. It was hypothesized that before group
discussion participant-jurors would recommend a more lenient sentence for an
attractive defendant than for an unattractive defendant, but that after group
discussion the attractive and unattractive defendants would receive equally
harsh sentence recommendations. This prediction was based on research that
• The ampersand (&) is used when the
reference appears within parentheses.
• If there are three to five authors, mention all
authors the first time. After that use the first
author and et al., as in “Gerbasi et al. (1977)
pointed out …”
• If there are six or more authors, use the first
author and et al. the first and subsequent
times.
Purpose 3:
Statement of purpose and rationale
• Be very explicit:
“The purpose of …”
“It was hypothesized that …”
• The literature reviewed is the basis for the
predictions.
• Researchers frequently base their
predictions on theories.
• Limit the use of “I” or “we” in all sections
of the manuscript (APA style rules just
recently began to allow the use of the first
person).
• There is no formal limit to the length of the
introduction, but the typical range is
between two and five type-written double-
spaced pages.

has shown that group discussion leads to problem solutions that are superior
to the solutions of individual participant’s (e.g., Shaw, 1932). So, if the
extralegal variable of defendant attractiveness does indeed result in jurors’
making inappropriate sentence recommendations when they act as individuals,
group discussion should result in rejection of attractiveness (a superior solution)
as a sentencing criterion. In other words, attractiveness of the defendant should
be less likely to influence the length of a juror’s sentence recommendation if the
recommendation follows group discussion.
Method
Participants
A total of 60 students (30 male and 30 female) who were enrolled in an
introductory psychology course at a northeastern university participated in this
experiment for course credit. They were ethnically diverse freshman or
sophomores who ranged in age from 18 to 24 years (M = 19.70, SD = 1.90).
Materials
The questionnaire, a two-page typed booklet, contained a cover page with
the title of the case, and a second page labeled “Years of Sentence” on which
were listed numbers 1 to 25. A rectangular table with six chairs and a large
screen (1 x 1 m) were set up in the experimental room for viewing the videotape
of the trial. The two videotaped versions of the trial (each 12-min long) were
Method
• The method section follows the introduction
– on the same page if space permits.
Heading levels
The rules for headings change when the
article reports more than one experiment
(see APA Publication Manual, pp. 113-114,
289-290).
• The word Method is centered and is NOT
underlined or italicized.
• The Participants, Materials, and Procedure
headings are NOT centered or indented, but
are italicized. the text begins on the next
line and is indented ½”.
Participants
• Who participated.
• How many participated.
• How they were selected.
• Identify important participant characteristics
(e.g., gender, age, ethnicity).
Materials
• Provide a complete description of the
materials you used.
• Psychologists use the metric system.
Therefore, all measurements are given in m,
mm, or cm, NOT in inches or feet.
Abbreviations for metric units are given in
the APA Publication Manual (pp. 106-108).
Purpose (Method section):
To provide in great detail the characteristics of the participants, the apparatus and/or materials used, and the procedure (what
experiences the participants had from the beginning to the end of the study). There should be enough detail in the method section to
permit someone else to replicate the study. (See pp. 17-20 of the APA Publication Manual.)

identical except for the high versus low attractiveness of the defendant. The
attractive and unattractive defendants were both acted by the same 25-year old
professional actress and model. In the highly attractive condition, she was
physically appealing, well-groomed, and neatly dressed. In the unattractive
condition, she was unkempt and sloppily attired. She was also made to look
physically unappealing (stained teeth, poor complexion, etc.) through the
assistance of the theatrical make-up staff. The defendant was charged with
vehicular manslaughter because, while intoxicated, she ran a red light and
killed a man who was crossing the street. For a complete description of the
case, see Landy and Aronson (1969).
Procedure
Six participants were randomly assigned to each jury group, with the
restriction that there be three males and three females in each. Of the 10
jury groups included in the experiment, five were randomly assigned to see
the videotape depicting the high attractive defendant (Group HI-A), and five
were randomly assigned to see the low attractive defendant (Group LO-A).
The groups were run on 10 consecutive days at 9:00 a.m.
Upon entering the experimental room, the female experimenter asked
the six participants to seat themselves at a table. She informed them that
after watching a videotape of a trial, they would be asked to recommend a
Apparatus
• Either the apparatus OR materials
heading is used. The apparatus heading is
used if you are primarily describing
equipment. The materials heading is used if
you are describing word lists, reading
material, etc.
• Manufacturer’s name and the model
number of any apparatus commercially
available must be reported.
• Report all physical characteristics ( e.g.,
measurements, color, intensity of lights or
tones) of self-made apparatus. The details
provided must permit the reader to duplicate
the apparatus.
Procedure
• Review what was done to the participants
from the beginning to end of the study.
• Instructions are included verbatim only if
they are an experimental manipulation.
Otherwise, they are paraphrased.
• The design of the experiment and how
participants were assigned to each group are
mentioned in this section.
Group abbreviations: It is easier for readers
if meaningful initials or numerals are
used for group names rather than
meaningless letters or numbers.

after watching a videotape of a trial, they would be asked to recommend a
sentence for the defendant. The experimenter then played the appropriate
videotape. One-half of the participants were shown the tape with the
attractive defendant, whereas the other half were shown the tape with the
unattractive defendant. Immediately after the presentation, the questionnaire
booklet was given to each participant. The experimenter instructed them to
circle a number (from 1 to 25) on the second page of the booklet to indicate
the sentence length they thought was appropriate for the defendant.
Participants were given as much time as they needed, but were instructed
not say anything to the other participants. The booklets were then collected,
and the experimenter asked the six participants to discuss the case freely as
if they were a real jury. They were told to notify the experimenter (who was
waiting in the next room) when, as a group, they felt they had fully discussed
the case. Once the experimenter was notified, she re-entered the room and
handed all participant-jurors another copy of the questionnaire. She again
asked them to fill it out individually, after considering all aspects of the case
brought out in the group discussion. The experimenter specifically told
participants not to feel bound by the response they gave to the questionnaire
prior to the opportunity for group discussion.
• Avoid sexist language: use
“they” rather than “he” or
“she”, except when a male or
female is explicitly referred to.
Rules for Using Numbers
(See APA Publication Manual, pp. 122-130.)
• General Rule: Numbers 10 or above are
expressed as numerals. Nine or below are
written as words.
• The rules for when to write a number as a
word or as a numeral are probably the
hardest to learn because there are many
exceptions to this rule. It is wise to always
refer back to the APA Publication Manual.
• Some exceptions to the general rule:
1. Measurements are always numerals.
2. Statistical functions are always
numerals.
3. Groups of numbers with one value
above 10 are always numerals.
4. Numbers that indicate a specific
place in a series: Figure 1, Group 4,
Trial 6 are numerals.
5. If a sentence begins with a number,
it is always a word.

At the end of the experiment participants were thanked for their
participation and were instructed not to discuss the case with anyone else.
They were also informed that within two weeks they could contact the
experimenter to receive a detailed explanation of the research project. An
additional group of six participants was excused partway through the
experiment due to a malfunction of the videotape monitor.
Results
A preliminary analysis comparing sentences given by male (M = 7.40,
SD = 1.30) versus female (M = 7.05, SD = 1.15) participant-jurors indicated
no significant difference, t(58) = 1.73, p > .10. Therefore, the gender variable
was not included in the main analysis. Results of a 2 x 2 mixed design
analysis of variance (high versus low attractive defendant x no discussion
versus discussion) showed a significant main effect for attractiveness,
F(1, 58) = 10.88, p < .01. Sentence recommendations for the low-attractive
defendant (M = 9.35, SD = 1.27) were longer than for the high-attractive
defendant (M = 5.05, SD = 1.35). Results also indicated a main effect for
group discussion versus no group discussion, such that sentence length prior
to group discussion (M = 8.40, SD = 1.56) was higher than sentence length
after group discussion (M = 6.00, SD = 1.32), F(1, 58) = 12.22, p < .001.
• Document any variations in procedures.
Results
• Center heading.
Purpose: To summarize the results and the
statistical analyses (see APA Publication Manual,
pp. 20-26).
• Results can be summarized through figures,
tables, or in the text, but can only be
presented once.
Statistical Results
Purpose: To present all results – even non-
signifcant ones.
• When reporting means, always include
associated measures of variability (e.g., SD,
variance).
• The letter that represents the type of test
used is italicized only if it is not a Greek
letter. Note, the symbol for chi square, χ2,
is NOT italicized.
• Put spaces between numbers and symbols as
you would words.
• The number in the parentheses represents
the degrees of freedom (df value). Do NOT
type the letters “df”.
• When reporting the results of an analysis of
variance there are two df values.
• The p is always italicized.
• Do not confuse the < and > sign.
• Give a verbal description of the results, end
the statement with a comma, and follow the
statement with statistical evidence. (The
phrase before the comma is a complete
sentence.)

These main effects were qualified by a significant interaction effect,
F(1, 58) = 7.46, p < .01; therefore, tests of simple main effects were done.
As shown in Figure 1, sentence recommendations for the low-attractive
defendant were longer than for the high-attractive defendant only when they
were made prior to group discussion, F(1, 58) = 17.54, p < .001. After
group discussion, however, defendant attractiveness had no effect on
sentence-length recommendations, F < 1.
Discussion
The finding that, before group discussion, participant-jurors sentenced
the unattractive defendant more harshly than the attractive defendant
replicates the findings of earlier research (e.g., Efran, 1974; Kaplan &
Kemerick, 1974; Landy & Aronson, 1969; Sigall & Ostrove, 1975). After
group discussion, however, high versus low defendant attractiveness no
longer influenced the length of the participant-jurors’ sentence decisions.
These results support the experimental hypothesis that group discussion of
the case would tend to eliminate the influence of defendant attractiveness
on individual sentence decisions. Since no data were collected that reflect
the content of the group discussions, future research should either monitor
group discussion to determine attractiveness was discussed, or should
assess the impact of directing deliberations toward or away from a
discussion of defendant attractiveness.
• Do NOT interpret the results in the Results
section.
• Refer to specific tables and figures in the
text (e.g., “Figure 1 indicates …”), so the
reader will know when to refer to them.
• The figures are placed at the end of the
manuscript, but will be inserted in the text
when printed.
• When a specific figure and its number are
referred to, “Figure” is capitalized, and a
numeral is used.
• If the results are summarized in a table, the
words “Table 1” must be mentioned in the
text, so the reader will know to look for the
table.
• Provide a brief description of the results
seen on the figure.
• If the F value is less than 1, simply report
F < 1 and omit the df and p values.
Discussion
Purpose: To review whether the results
supported or did not support your hypotheses,
whether they are consistent with the published
literature, and the conclusions and implications
of the results. (See APA Publication Manual,
pp. 26-27.)
• Center heading.
• Tie in the results of the present experiment
with those reported in the literature.
• Discussion sections frequently begin with a
review of the major results.
• The results are tied in with the hypotheses
stated in the introduction.

One prediction was not completely verified: that after group discussion
the attractive defendant would receive a sentence as harsh as that received by
the unattractive defendant. The results show that sentence values assigned
to the attractive and unattractive defendant were equally lenient after group
discussion. Apparently, the unattractive defendant had received unduly
harsh sentence recommendations when there was no group discussion.
The effect group discussion had on the sentencing of attractive and
unattractive defendants may not generalize to other types of defendant
characterizations. For example, Myers and Kaplan (1976) found that for
defendants involved in a high- versus low-guilt case, group discussion
increased rather than decreased the length of the sentence decisions. Perhaps
group discussion influences the effect the high- versus low-guilt variable
had on sentencing differently from the way it influences the effects of the
high- versus low-attraction variable. Alternatively, procedural differences
may have caused the difference in results. Myers and Kaplan had
participants read booklets containing the summary of the case, whereas in
the present experiment participants saw a videotape of the trial. Research
reported by Williams, Farmer, Lee, Cundick, Howel, and Rooker (1975),
however, indicates that mode of trial presentation may not be an important
variable. Williams et al. found no difference in punishment (dollar amounts
• Authors frequently indicate if they believe
the results can be generalized.
• Reminder: Use et al if the citation has been
previously given and there are three or more
authors.

assigned in a land condemnation case) among groups seeing the trial live
versus in color video, black and white video, audio only, or transcript
only. Another procedural difference was that participant-jurors in the
Myers and Kaplan study read both high- and low-guilt cases (a within-
subject design), whereas in the present experiment participant-jurors saw
either the high- or low-attractive defendant tape (a between-subject design).
Additional research must be conducted to determine if the type of design
used can account for the opposite effects group discussion had in the two
sentencing experiments.
The opposite effects of group discussion obtained in the present study
and Myers and Kaplan’s (1976) study also raised an interesting theoretical
question. Myers and Kaplan explained their results in terms of Anderson’s
(1974) information-integration theory, which predicts that group discussion
should increase the difference in the length of the sentence between high-
and low-guilt cases as compared with the sentence length prior to group
discussion. Since information-integration theory does not differentiate
between the guilt and attractiveness variables, it makes predictions opposite
to the results obtained in the present experiment. It may be that this theory
needs to be modified.
• Discuss problems you encountered when
carrying out the research and suggestions
for improving the research effort.
• Elaborate on contradictory results.

The practical implication of the results of the present experiment is that
those who were concerned that attraction of the defendant may influence
jury decisions should question the validity of the conclusions of earlier
research. The current study supports the idea that defendant attractiveness
only has an effect on juror sentence recommendations in the absence of jury
discussions of the case. Because real juries always discuss cases presented
to them, the extralegal attractiveness variable may not influence jury
decisions about a defendant. Future investigations of the effects of
attractiveness on jury decisions should allow for case discussions.
Otherwise the research setting will not be representative of the real legal
environment.
• Discussion sections frequently end with a
review of the implications of the results.

NEW PAGE – The reference section always begins on a new page.
The exact format used varies among periodicals, books, chapters in books, etc., and you should look up the style in the APA
Publication Manual (4.16). There are many “picky” rules for citing references
References
Anderson, N. J. (1974). Cognitive algebra: Integration theory applied
to social attribution. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental
social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Deitz, S. (2000, April 18 – last update). Lawpsych: Forensic psychology
and psychiatry WebRing [Online]. Available: http://www.lawpsych.com
[August 1, 2000].
Efran, M. G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment
of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment
in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45-54.
Gerbasi, K. C., Zuckerman, M., & Reis, H. T. (1977). Justice needs a
new blind-fold: A review of mock jury research. Psychological Bulletin,
84, 323-345.
Izzett, R. R., & Leginski, W. (1974). Group discussion and the influence
of defendant characteristics in a simulated-jury setting. Journal of Social
Psychology, 93, 271-279.
Kaplan, M. G., & Kemerick, G. D. (1974). Juror judgment as
informational integration: Combining evidential and nonevidential
information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 493-499.
References
Purpose: To provide the complete reference
for every citation mentioned in the
manuscript.
• Center heading.
• References are NOT numbered.
• All references are in alphabetical order.
Rules for journal articles:
• The last name appears first, followed by
the initials.
• The first line of each reference is flush
left and the subsequent lines are
indented ½ inch.
• The ampersand (&) is used if there is
more than one author.
• There is a comma before the &.
• The year appears in parentheses and is
followed by a period.
• The first letter of the first word is the
only one capitalized in the title, and the
title is followed by a period.
• The name of the journal article is NOT
abbreviated.
• The journal title is italicized and the
first letter of each main word is
capitalized.
• The volume number and pages follow
the journal title.
• All numbers are separated by commas.
• Do NOT use the words “volume” or
“pages”.
• Only the volume number is italicized.
• End with a period.

Landy, D., & Aronson, E. (1969). The influence of the character of
the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal
of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 141-152.
Myers, D. G., & Kaplan, M. F. (1976). Group-induced polarization
in simulated juries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 63-66.
Nemeth, C., & Sosis, R. H. (1973). A simulated jury study:
Characteristics of the defendant and the jurors. Journal of Social
Psychology, 90, 221-229.
Saks, M. J., & Hastie, R. (1978). Social psychology in court.
New York: VanNostrand Reinhold.
Shaw, J. I. (1972). Reactions to victims and defendants in varying
degrees of attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 27, 329-330.
Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: Effects
of offender attractiveness and the nature of the crime on juridic
judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 410-414.
Williams, G. R., Farmer, L. C., Lee, R. E., Cundick, B. P., Howell,
R. J., & Rooker, K. (1975). Juror perceptions of trial testimony as a
function of the method of presentation: A comparison of live, color video,
black-and-white video, audio, and transcript presentations. Brigham
Young University Law Review, 2, 375-421.
Titles of books are italicized. Only the first
word and proper nouns in the title are
capitalized.
The first word following a colon in the title
of an article is capitalized.

Author Note
This sample manuscript reported data published by Izzett and
Leginski (1974).
The Author Note follows Appendices, if
present, or the References (see APA
Publication Manual pp. 29, 203-205, 300).

Table 1
Mean Sentence in Years for Low and High-attractive Defendant With and
Without Discussion
_____________________________________________________
Attractiveness
Low High
No Discussion 11.52 5.34
Discussion 7.23 4.81
Tables
(See APA Publication Manual, pp. 147-176.)
• Each table is placed on a separate page.
• Place the page header and page number on
the top of each table.
• Table number and title are placed on the top
of the table.
• “Table 1” is NOT italicized.
• “Table 1” is NOT indented or centered.
• The first letter of each main word in the
table title is capitalized.
• The table title is italicized.
This table is not part of the sample manuscript. It is provided only to show how tables are presented. Remember, results can be
summarized through figures, tables, or in the text, but may only be presented once.

Figure Caption
Figure 1. Mean sentence in years as a function of defendant’s attractiveness
(low vs. high) and amount of discussion (“no discussion” denoted by
the filled bar; “with discussion” denoted by the open bar).
Figure Captions
• The page is titled “Figure Caption” and
the title is centered.
• “Figure 1” is italicized.
• Nothing is indented on the figure
caption page.
• All figure captions are placed on the
same page, with figures clearly
numbered.
REMNDERS:
1. Write clearly and concisely.
2. All pages of a manuscript are double-spaced. NEVER SINGLE SPACE.
3. Check the APA Publication Manual for additional rules.
4. Plan on writing many drafts before the final one.
5. Proofread your final version and correct spelling, typing, and grammatical errors (this is very simple if you have typed the
the paper on a word processor).
6. Make sure you have not missed a section.
7. Be sure that the sections are in the correct order.

0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Low High
Attractiveness
MeanSentence(yrs)
No Discussion
Discussion
Figures
(See APA Publication Manual, pp. 176-
201.)
• Each figure is drawn on a separate page
and is placed after the Figure Caption
page.
• Page is not titled or numbered.
• The vertical axis should be about two-
thirds the length of the horizontal axis.
• If either axis does not begin at zero, a
double slash mark must be made to
indicate the discontinuity.
• All axes must be labeled.
• The legend that identifies the group
names appears within the axes on the
figure.
• Do NOT put the figure caption (same as
figure title) on the figure. It is placed
on a separate page at the end of the
report.
• Figures are drawn in black (NO colors
are allowed).

Sample manuscript (1) http://www.cheapassignmenthelp.com/

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (8)

Similar to Sample manuscript (1) http://www.cheapassignmenthelp.com/ (20)

More from Assignment Help (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Sample manuscript (1) http://www.cheapassignmenthelp.com/